Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Three Interfacial Conductive Networks Formed in Carbon Black-Filled PA6/PBT Blends
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Physicochemical Properties of Modified Corn Starch–Chitosan Biodegradable Films
Previous Article in Journal
Capsule Independent Antimicrobial Activity Induced by Nanochitosan against Streptococcus pneumoniae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physicochemical, Bacteriostatic, and Biological Properties of Starch/Chitosan Polymer Composites Modified by Graphene Oxide, Designed as New Bionanomaterials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biodegradable Binary and Ternary Complexes from Renewable Raw Materials

by
Agnieszka Folentarska
1,
Jakub Łagiewka
1,
Magdalena Krystyjan
2 and
Wojciech Ciesielski
1,*
1
Faculty of Exact, Natural and Technical Sciences, Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa, 13/15 Armii Krajowej Ave., 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland
2
Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 122 Balicka Street, 30-149 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(17), 2925; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13172925
Submission received: 21 June 2021 / Revised: 26 August 2021 / Accepted: 26 August 2021 / Published: 30 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodegradable and Natural Polymers)

Abstract

:
The aim of this paper is to investigate the interactions between polysaccharides with different electrical charges (anionic and neutral starches) and proteins and fats in food ingredients. Another objective is to understand the mechanisms of these systems and the interdependence between their properties and intermolecular interactions. At present, there are not many studies on ternary blends composed of natural food polymers: polysaccharides of different electrical charge (anionic and neutral starches), proteins and lipids. Additionally, there are no reports concerning what type of interactions between polysaccharide, proteins and lipids exist simultaneously when the components are mixed in different orders. This paper intends to fill this gap. It also presents the application of natural biopolymers in the food and non-food industries.

1. Introduction

In terms of political (e.g., raw material dictates), economic and ecological (e.g., environmental pollution, particularly during chemical coal processing) factors, and considering the depletion of petrochemical and carbochemical raw materials, increasing attention has been paid to natural renewable raw materials, e.g., polysaccharides, proteins and lipids. Biodegradable materials, such as wood, animal skin and intestines, have been utilised since ancient times. Reed and straw, wool and cotton and, in the very earliest times, papyrus, parchment and paper, were all in common use. The natural rubber (which has been known of since the late Middle Ages) boom began after the development of sulphur treatment by Goodyear (vulcanization). Goodyear developed rubber that was appropriate for, among other things, tires and inner tubes. Rubber, heavily treated with sulphur, was known as ebonite. However, the biodegradability of these products was low. At the turn of the century, Henry Ford boasted of manufacturing a suit made of fibre obtained via formaldehyde treatment of a protein. In terms of biodegradable plastics, galalith (obtained from acid casein) [1] and other products of weakly nitrated cellulose—cellophane and celluloid—became widely popular.
The usability of biodegradable plastics is determined from their physical properties such as mechanical and thermal resistance, barrier properties, their adequate decomposition time in the environment and resulting decomposition products. None of the above listed plastics were characterized by properties that would be satisfactory from this point of view, and their viability does not even take their production costs into account.
In the 1980s, attempts were made to introduce single-use products, such as starch mouldings and extrudates, which were used for the production of, for instance, crockery, moulds and packaging [2,3,4,5,6,7]. However, their mechanical resistance and durability were too low; therefore, a proportion of natural fibres [8] and synthetic polymers [9] were added to the starch. The combination of starch with synthetic, though biodegradable, polymers, such as polyesters, resulted in slowly decomposing type Mater-Bi polymers [10,11]. Considerable popularity was gained by biodegradable polymers obtained without the use of starch. These included poly[lactic] acid and polylactides [12,13,14,15,16,17] and other poly[hydroxyalcanoic acids] [18,19], as well as their copolymers with low and high molecular molecules [20,21,22,23]. Biodegradable synthetic plastics include polyester (poly[caprolactone]) [24,25] and polyamide (poly[caprolactame]), also known as nylon 6 [26].
At the same time, so-called green plastics were starting to be used, such as complexes produced from starch (up to 40%) moulded into vinyl polymers, for instance, polyethylene. However, such plastics were better geared to the requirements of aesthetics rather than ecology. Starch decomposes into CO2 and water reasonably quickly, leaving in the environment a synthetic polymer that is undecomposed, yet dispersed and invisible to the naked eye [27,28].
Synthetic plastics that decompose entirely to CO2 and H2O and are made of polymerized vinyl monomers, containing appropriate catalysers (d2w plastics) are known, but, due to their origin, they do not fulfil the EU directive on the use of renewable materials. Moreover, their production requires the use of an excessive amount of energy [29]. However, such requirements can be met by complexes produced from polysaccharides, proteins and lipids.
Macronutrients are chemical compounds responsible for providing the human body with energy; macronutrients are grouped as saccharides, lipids and proteins. These compounds are consumed in large amounts in comparison to vitamins or minerals, and also occur together in many food systems. Food processing may modify the properties and interactions of macronutrients, for instance, in terms of flavour, taste, texture, shelf life or nutritional value [30,31]. The interactions are very complex, especially for binary and ternary systems; understanding their occurrence during food processing may be useful in optimized the production and development of new food products with designed microstructures and functionality [32,33].
Polysaccharides: starch, carboxymethylcellulose, pectins, synthetic phosphorylated starch, carrageenans, hyaluronic acid, xanthan gum.
Lipids: esters of stearic, oleic acid.
Proteins: albumin, lysozyme.
The binary systems from natural biopolymers (polysaccharides, lipids or proteins) have been extensively studied, and the binary interaction effects of their properties have been characterized. The formation of starch-lipid complexes exhibits the reduced swelling and solubility of starch, as well as there being retarded gelatinization and retrogradation, and the enzymic digestion rate is slowed down [34,35,36,37]. There are differing possibilities for the formation of binary and ternary complexes due to changes in the mixing order of compounds [32].
Binary complexes have been the subject of intensive research for 50 years; however, the ternary complexes between starch-lipid-proteins have become a new field of investigation with an increasing number of discoveries and applications. This review introduces information concerning ternary complexes, interactions, preparation methods, analytical techniques and applications in the food industry.

2. Starch-Lipid Interactions

Polysaccharides form helical complexes with lipids [38] (Figure 1). Formation of a helix is possible thanks to the suitable orientation of the polysaccharide chain in relation to the hydrophobic lipid thread. Due to this, the external portion of the complex becomes hydrophilic. Such ordering of the structure is most commonly used for the implementation of the appropriate texture and thixotropic properties of foodstuffs (doughs, creams, sauces) and cosmetics.
The main driving force to form a complex between starch and lipids is by inclusion complexation naturally in native starch or during heating-cooling protocols. Inclusion complexation involves a series of non-covalent interaction: hydrogens bonds, hydrophobic attractions, van der Waals forces [39,40].
The outer surface contains the hydrophilic hydroxyl groups of α-1,4 glucan helices; additionally, methylene groups and glycosidic bonds line the inner core and form a hydrophobic cavity with an ability to accommodate proper ligands. The glucan sites with the presence of lipids are composed of six glucosyl residues per turn; however, there are seven or eight glucosyl units per turn that have other ligand types. The amylose-lipid complexes can form partially ordered structure known as a V-type crystalline form, which can be grouped as anhydrous Va and hydrated Vh forms [34,41,42]. Structural research has indicated the insertion of lipids into the cavity of the amylose helix. The carboxyl group of fatty acids (FAs) or the glyceride moiety are influenced by steric hindrance and electrostatic repulsions; thus, the hydrophylic group is directed to the outside of the helix. Further self-assembling forms crystalline lamelae for the lipid containing helices, where the helices are oriented perpendicularly to the plane of the lamelle. There is a theory concerning micron-sized spherulites, which are formed by the crystalline lamelle and the interspacing amorphous regions. On the other hand, the lipids have weaker binding with highly branched amylopectin in comparison to amylose. Furthermore, several studies exist that evidence the interaction of amylopectin-lipids, but few studies indicate an ability to order crystalline complexes [43,44].

3. Starch-Protein Interactions

In the literature, one can find articles [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66] on the synthesis of binary polysaccharide-protein complexes. The polysaccharide-protein complexes were obtained either via electrosynthesis or precipitation at the isoelectric point. Some of these complexes are characterized by the resistance of styrene-butadiene copolymers (Figure 2).
Starch–protein interactions involve forces such as hydrogen bonds and electrostatic and van der Waals forces. The hydrogen bond’s ability is due to a high level of donor and acceptor-like hydroxyl groups in starch and nitrogen and oxygen atoms in protein. Electrostatic interactions are formed between oxygen/hydroxyl groups and mostly ionized carboxylate, the ammonia groups of side chains and amide bonds [67,68]. Due to weak ionization of oxygen in starch, the electrostatic force is not always the main driving force.
For instance, potato starch contains additional phosphate groups which interact strongly with wheat protein positive charges and adsorb wheat protein and convert it to starch. The additional protein in starchy products with different pH allows them to modulate the water binding capacity and reduce the viscosity of products. The binary complex increases gel strength due to increased protein density [69]. For starch–gluten systems, a surface interaction between granuls and the gluten molecules can be observed. An increase of storage modulus during the addition of gluten to wheat and rye starches indicates the possibility to facilitate the granule–granule contact and to enhance formation of a transient network [70]. Other studies relating to starch–sodium caseinate have shown behaviour as a power-law fluid with shear thinning and increased viscosity. The increased viscosity may have an influence on the swelling volume; furthermore, swollen granules collapse due to pasting and diffusion of starch from the gelatinized granule to the bulk solution. This means the system may be limited by the protein continuous phase; thus, the net effect is responsible for increasing the volume by limiting disintegration [71]. The starchy products have different gel properties with different media pH. The water binding capacity increases with increased pH for lower protein solubility, which is the same as its relation with viscosity. However, an inverted relation is present for starch–albumin gels with media pH. The gel microstructure is depended on the pH, but the microstructure differences does not provide hardness changes [72,73].

4. Lipid-Protein Interactions

Lipid-protein complexes (lipoproteins) are interesting, primarily because of their physiological importance (Figure 3). Research has focused on the interaction of cellular membrane proteins with lipids [74,75,76,77,78], which is linked to the functioning of these membranes, as well as intracellular and extracellular lipid behaviour. Such types of interaction create opportunities to recreate cell membranes [79]. Due to their elevated affinity to lipids, lipoproteins are responsible for the transport of lipid and lipid-like substances within organisms [80]. The structure of cell membranes has been used for the construction of osmotic and dialysis membranes [81].
Lipid-protein binary complexes are formed via the hydrophobic affinity of long-chain FAs to the binding pockets, which contain mostly alkyl and aromatic aminoacids. The binding pockets are obtained from the folding of protein chains due to secondary, tertiary and quaternary structural factors. The conformational factors are driven by van der Waals forces, which favour aggregation, but the carboxylic group as a polar moiety is found to be on the outer part of biomolecules. The carboxylic group is always found around the non-anionic group due to conflicts of electrostatic interactions; the polar group may freely interact with water molecules [82,83].
There appears to be protection of the long aliphatic chain of FA via its hydrophobic affinity inside macromolecules. The protein can complex FAs in different stoichiometries, such as human α-lactalbumin (α-LA). The FA-α-LA complex is characterized by a slight reduction of secondary structure and total loss of tertiary structure due to a fluctuating structure with strongly reduced stability [84]. Another example of conformational changes is for the FA-human serum albumin, which loses tertiary structure in the same manner as the previous system. The conformational changes were only observed in the crystal structure, but there is no evidence for identical conformation in solution [85].

5. Starch-Lipid-Protein Interactions

The standard procedure of the ternary complex leads to inclusion of lipids into starch and then the adherence of protein onto the starch surface. The lipid forms inclusion with the alkyl chain, and then the carboxyl group of FA and hydroxyl of starch interact with protein [34]. For instance, β-lactoglobulin and whey protein possess an isoelectric point under a pH value of 6; these proteins can be used as model biomolecules in ternary complexes. Under the isoelectric point of protein, carboxyl groups of FA and positively charged proteins show electrostatic interaction. The main problem is with the pH of starchy foods, which have almost neutral pH and may form anion–anion interactions with proteins and FA [86]. Another protein, type-A gelatin, is acidly-hydrolyzed from collagen, and the isoelectric point value found is 8.0–9.0. Thus, A-type gelatin should be positively charged at a neutral medium, and anion–anion interactions do not collide [87]. On the other hand, shorter alkyl chains and a lower degree of unsaturation favour ternary complexes, but are less thermally stable [88]. Ternary complexes may exhibit a V-type XRD pattern, which is present in starch–FA complexes. Ternary systems are characterized by a greater amount of long- and short-range structural order compared to the binary systems [89].

6. Preparation Methods of Binary and Ternary Complexes

There are several different methods for obtaining ternary complexes of starch-lipid-protein, which may differ with stoichiometry, order of added compound or type of ingredients [34,90]. Despite a lack of enzymatic methods, there are some known standard procedures:
  • Classical method. The starch solution is heated in a boiling water bath and is then cooled overnight at room temperature. A water solution of protein and FA are added to the aqueous starch solution, which is then heated in a boiling water bath, kept overnight at room temperature and is finally centrifuged. The supernatant consists of starch–lipid–protein complexes. The method is based on a standard protocol based mostly on the preparation of binary complexes [91].
  • Thermomechanical method. The ternary complex is produced in a Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA) by adding starch, protein, lipids and water. The obtained complex is then frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried and then ground. The obtained powders consist of starch–lipid–protein complexes [92] (Figure 4).
  • Enzymatical method. Ternary complex may be obtained via two strategies. The first method is fully enzymatic and focuses on polymerization of the primer to branched biopolymers. The second method is based on enzymatic hydrolysis of the branched biopolymer into smaller parts, which can then interact with other biopolymers. It can then be formed into binary complexes [91,92].

7. Edible Biodegradable Films

A ternary complex can be formed from biopolymers, which are natural polymers with biodegradability. Furthermore, the biopolymers can be the edible compounds of food. Nowadays, biopolymers are used to form films for food coating, but there is still a necessity for edible types. The edible films are mostly formed from one or two compounds; nevertheless, three-component systems have become promising film systems. Based on structure, compounds and preparation, the ternary complexes exhibit different bioproperties [93,94].
Most typical biopolymers and properties in food coating (Figure 5):
  • Edible films from starch are formed mostly by high-amylose starches (containing at least 70% amylose). The starch films are characterized by good elasticity and oxygen impermeability, as well as oil/fat resistance or solubility in hot/cold water. Moreover, the starch packaging exhibits an ability to bind water molecules from products and then decrease the activity of water in food with the reduced development of pathogenic microorganisms. Thus, the starch films make good coatings for bakery products and can increase the freshness of meats or other foods such as fruits and vegetables after freezing [95,96,97,98].
  • The most popular type of proteins applied in food coatings are collagen, gelatin, casein, soy protein, gluten or albumin protein. Collagen coatings are mostly used in meat packaging and are characterized by insolubility and reduced loss of meat juice during heating, and they also blend well with meat. The next protein, gelatin, is mostly applied in the microencapsulation of food flavours. Furthermore, the gelatin’s coating allows the limitation of water evaporation from meat and the development of bacterial microflora, and can migrate fatty substances. Casein, as a dairy protein, is characterized by good mechanical properties, good solubility in water and the improved nutritional value of food. Dairy proteins’ films are used to cover fruits, vegetables, dairy products and even meat products [98,99,100,101,102].
  • Films made only from lipids are extra brittle and thicker due to hydrophobicity. On the other hand, films based on the addition of lipids are one of the most mechanically stable, and they have barrier residences and prevent moisture migration. Thus, the binary or ternary complexes with lipids are the best solutions, rather than simple lipid films. From lipid binary or ternary blends, there are found a wide range of products such as essential oils, waxes, paraffin, acetyloglycerides and shellac. Those coatings are preferable for covering meats and sometimes citrus vegetables [103,104,105].

8. Applications of Renewable Raw Materials

8.1. Food Industry

Over 40% of the total demand for plastics comes from the food industry. Although conventional packaging has many advantages, one disadvantage—the lack of biodegradability—means that they pose a high risk to the natural environment and, consequently, to human health [106]. One alternative to plastics are natural, biodegradable polymer complexes, which are successfully used in the food industry, mainly as an element of packaging—a tool that allows one to maintain high quality and the safety of food products. La Mantia et al. proved that biodegradable systems can successfully compete with traditional, non-biodegradable polyethylene-based blends [107]. The results showed that PLA/PBAT (poly(butylene-adipate-co-terephthalate) and poly(lactic acid)), as well as MaterBi, i.e., an extrusion grade with proprietary composition, based on biodegradable aliphatic andaliphatic/aromatic polyesters, showed good potential as a biodegradable polymer systems for agricultural product packaging, especially for the production of nets for the packaging of fruits and vegetables.

8.1.1. Nanomaterials

The common packaging polymers used in the food industry are starch, chitosan, cellulose and alginates [108,109]. Starch films show poor mechanical and low barrier properties; hence, starch has been complexed with other polymers, thereby improving the physical and mechanical properties of such films. For example, Krystyjan et al. reinforced starch-based films with psyllium mucilage in order to obtain natural, edible and biodegradable films with improved mechanical and functional properties [110]. Kasmuri and Zait used eggshell and chitosan as fillers in potato starch to overcome the inherent drawbacks of bio-plastic [111]. Unfortunately, despite this, natural polymers still have many shortcomings. Low thermal stability, high moisture absorption and poor mechanical strength are all particularly problematic [106]. Introducing an added component in the form of a nanomaterial can strengthen the structure of the entire complex and thus allow new, still biodegradable materials with greater efficiency to be obtaining. Nanocomposites consist of a polymer matrix as a continuous phase and nanomaterials as a discontinuous phase, with dimensions in the range of 1–100 nm [112]. Lee et al. proposed active nanocomposite films with antimicrobial activity. They incorporated silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) into pectin/pullulan complexes. According to obtained data, silver nanoparticles improved the mechanical properties of pullulan/AgNPs and pullulan/AgNPs/pectin composites and showed high antimicrobial activity against food borne pathogens: Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes. One of the most commonly used nanomaterials are carbon-based materials. Graphene and other graphene family nanomaterials play one of the leading roles in the development of nanotechnology due to their unique properties [113]. Krystyjan et al. describes a green synthesis preparation of bionanocomposites consisting of starch/chitosan/graphene oxide (GO). The authors claimed that the tensile strength of composites with GO nanoparticles were comparable with commodity plastic films such as HDPE (High Density Polyethylene) and LDPE (Low Density Polyethylene). Additionally, cell-based analyses showed no toxic effect of the composites on HaCat keratinocytes and HepG2 hepatoma cells [110]. Jamróz et al. developed films based on furcellaran (FUR) and nanofillers (graphene oxide (GO), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)) via a solution casting method. Nanocomposite films with AgNPs showed antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria and fungi (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus) [114].

8.1.2. Antimicrobial Materials

As a result of changes in the food preferences of consumers and trends in industrial production, new food packaging technologies are developing. These extend the shelf life, maintain the safety and control the quality of food [115]. One of the many ways to extend the shelf life of food is to use packaging polymers with biological properties, e.g., antibacterial and antifungal activity. Antimicrobial properties of packaging result from the type of polymer material, which contain bound or leaching antimicrobials. They may also exhibit varied mechanisms: passive or active action [116]. Examples of polymers with such an effect are chitosan [110], lysozyme [117] and bacteriocins [118]. Additionally, the antimicrobial properties of the polymer complexes are enhanced by introducing metals, e.g., silver [119], essential oils [120] or organic acids with a preservative effect [121] into their structure. Wu et al. developed a green process of anchoring nisin onto oxidized cellulose through a simple Schiff-based reaction [118]. As a result, antimicrobial active food packaging with an oxygen barrier property, water resistance and transmittance was obtained. Seydim et al. showed that whey protein foils enriched with oregano oil can be successfully used in the fight against E. coli [122]. Moreover, whey protein films with the addition of nisin and natamycin have been confirmed to exhibit high inhibition rates for the yeast and mould occurring naturally in Kasar cheese. In turn, bergamot and lemon oils were effective against S. aureus and E. coli [120].

8.1.3. Active and Intelligent Packaging

Natural polymers used in packaging can perform various functions, depending on their physical and chemical properties. New generations of active and intelligent packaging are the future of the food packaging industry [123]. An important function of active packaging is to absorb moisture, which is the main cause of food spoilage. There are many compounds on the market that exhibit hygroscopic properties that include natural polymers such as sorbitol, xylitol, fructose and polyvinyl alcohol [124]. Cellulose and its derivatives also show good hygroscopic properties, which has been confirmed in many scientific studies [125]. In turn, Farooq et al., by utilizing a variety of different lignin morphologies, obtained cellulose nanofibril nanocomposite [126]. The obtained film exhibited complementary UV shielding and radical scavenging capability. Indumathi et al. proved that the combination of chitosan/cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP), incorporated with ZnO nanoparticles, allows one to obtain a structurally stable food packaging film appropriate for extending the shelf life of fresh black grapes in comparison with a commercial polyethylene cover. The water vapour transmission rate and oxygen transmission rate of such films were significantly lower in comparison with commercial polymeric films [127].

8.1.4. Biosensors

Natural polymers are widely used as biosensors, substances that respond to an impulse from the external environment, in the form of a chemical or physical stimulus that causes a specific change in the properties of the material [128]. The way biosensors work is manifold due to their broad properties [129]. Used in food packaging, they monitor the food quality along the food chain, such as composition, storage conditions and bacterial growth [130]. An example would be anthocyanins extracted from natural fruits and vegetables as the source of pH-sensitive dyes. They produce different colour changes under acid and alkali environment so are largely used as colorimetric indicators in many foods’ intelligent packaging [118].

8.2. Non-Food Industry

Natural polymers such as rubbers and sluices are increasingly replacing synthetic materials due to their biocompatibility, low production cost, availability and non-toxicity. Due to their properties, they are products that are considered as alternative sources of raw materials for industrial applications [131].
In the face of restrictions on food production imposed on Poland by the European Union, the use of arable crops for environmental engineering may be beneficial for domestic agriculture and industries cooperating with agriculture. The current state-of-the-art and known technologies make it possible to obtain, from plants and plant materials, saccharides and a series of polysaccharides as basic materials for the chemical industry [132] (Figure 6). The diagram shows the possibilities of non-food use of polysaccharides, where a valuable raw material can also be found, e.g., cellulose and hemicellulose.
Domestic polysaccharide resources can be used without deep processing, adapting them to different purposes through physical, physicochemical, chemical and enzymatic modification. Examples of such applications may be adhesives; microcapsules; absorbents; and additives for the production of pulp, paper, biodegradable materials and plasticizers, which are important in the new generation of ceramics [133,134,135,136,137].
Starches, irrespective of their botanical origin and their constituents, i.e., amylose and amylopectin, readily form Werner-type complexes when their gels are mixed with aqueous solutions of transition metal salts. This gives the possibility of its use as sorbents in the separation of metal ions and wastewater treatment [138].
Studies on the thermal degradation of starch grains and grains coordinated with metal ions have shown that the coordination of polysaccharides contained therein with the metal can control the yield of the resulting char and volatile products. Carbonizates are potential starting materials for the production of second-generation biofuels [139]. It was also found that thermal decomposition at a temperature much lower than that of a polysaccharide not coordinated with metal ions is possible [140,141,142,143].
Research is being conducted on the use of starch of various botanical origins (potato, corn, waxy maize, tapioca and amaranth) and cereals (barley, oats, wheat, triticale and rye) as soil stabilizers, drilling muds, metal ion collectors and a source of biofuels through degradation to synthetic gas and char [132].
Activated carbons derived from grains and cereal straw are widely used in environmental fields such as groundwater [144], volatile organic compound (VOC) control [145] and wastewater treatment [146]. Zhen Li et al. described many industrial residues and agricultural and forestry products, as well as other cheap resources that can be used to prepare char/carbon [147,148].
Farm straw is also a promising raw material for active carbon production, mainly due to its ability to avoid environmental pollution through combustion. Activated carbons based on rice [149], wheat [150], sesame [151] and maize straw [152] were obtained.
Coal from different sources shows different adsorption properties. This allows for versatile applications. The content of lignin, cellulose and inorganic substances are all raw materials from which active carbon is produced. The choice of pyrolysis temperature, carbonization temperature and the addition of chemicals affect the formation of pores [153,154] and properties such as polarization, hydrophobicity, acidity and the adsorption capacity of active carbon [135,136,155].
The method of obtaining activated carbons has a large impact on the adsorption of heavy metals. Many authors have shown that activated carbons can be used to remove organic dyes and antibiotics from wastewater [156,157,158].
Native polysaccharides containing proteins and fats can also be used to obtain biochar from them. Produced from crops (straw and seeds), biochar is an excellent system for the sorption of, not only metal ions, but also for the sorption of pharmaceuticals (beta-blockers, anti-inflammatory drugs, sulfonamides, caffeine). The tested crop-derived biochar has great potential for soil improvement and wastewater treatment. The biochar derived from cereals is a useful material for application in environmental protection purposes [135,136].
An important factor for consumers in determining the quality of a product is colour, which is one of the most important factors influencing the appearance of a product. New ways to use natural dyes as replacements for these synthetic dyes are being explored. Some of them are very sensitive. A good method of increasing the use of sensitive natural dyes is to encapsulate these dyes in colloidal particles by natural polymers, which may be carbohydrates, lipids or proteins. In recent years, encapsulation has been increasingly used for various purposes, including in non-food products. This technique improves the stability of sensitive natural dyes and offers the possibility of entrapping water-insoluble dyes for better application in an aqueous system [159].
The systems presented in this study can be directly applicable, not only as starting materials for the production of biofuels, but also in various fields of engineering and environmental protection. Systems have properties that enable the capture of relatively large volumes of water, creating a “clathrates”. These properties allow them to be used, inter alia, as collector metal ion binding substances, able to separate heavy metals from soil, as stabilizing substances (organic fertilizer) on embankments and on the waterfront of rivers, and as components of drilling fluids, causing, in addition to the lifting of excavated material, the improvement of lubrication holes and drill levelling disorders [137,138].
Biopolymer materials are gaining more and more significance in medicine and biotechnology. Due to the increase in the number of microorganisms resistant to antibiotics and other antimicrobial agents, new and cost-effective solutions are sought to overcome drug resistance. Khachatryan et al., through the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using hyaluronan as a stabilizing matrix, obtained composites with bacteriostatic activity against E. coli, Staphylococcus spp. and Bacillus spp. [160]. Souza et al. also discussed polysaccharide-based materials resulting from physical processes and their biomedical use. These structures are created by combining charged polyelectrolytes in aqueous solutions without the use of toxic chemicals (cross-linkers). They examined main polysaccharides (glycosaminoglycans, marine polysaccharides and derivatives) containing ionizing groups in their structure as well as cellulose (neutral polysaccharide). They reviewed strategies including coacervation, ionotropic gelling, electrospinning, layer-by-layer coating, gelling of polymer mixtures, solvent evaporation and freeze-thaw methods. They focused on materials used to deliver growth factor (GF), scaffolds, antimicrobial coatings and wound dressings [161,162].

8.3. Future Prospective

The use of biodegradable natural polymers in the food and non-food industry is wide, and it is impossible to list all examples of their application here. The detailed knowledge of their properties broadens the possibilities of their use, which makes them more and more competitive in relation to plastics. It is undeniable that the subject of biodegradable materials obtained from renewable sources with specific properties is intensively researched. The research conducted in this area will have a huge impact on our future life. Their main goal is to reduce environmental pollution and stop the degradation of soil, air and water, consequently, improving the quality and safety of human life.

9. Conclusions

The gathered experience clearly demonstrates that the polysaccharide component of ternary complexes must possess an anionic character.
Ternary complexes create the foundations for a new generation of biodegradable engineering plastics (e.g., disposable tableware, packaging) and food (edible casings and packaging, microcapsules) plastics. Due to good mechanical properties, these novel plastics may fulfil many requirements of humanity as stable materials for everyday use. The composition of complexes and novel compounds may determine more ecological solutions. Other applications may be found, such as safe and edible toys for small children. The edible toys may be a solution, and prevent the swallowing of non-edible plastics by children. In addition, is important for future generations to replace many non-degradable plastics with ternary complexes from biopolymers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Ł., A.F.; Validation, W.C., M.K.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.F., J.Ł.; Writing—Review & Editing, M.K., W.C.; Visualization, J.Ł., A.F.; Supervision, M.K., W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hassa, R.; Mrzigod, J.; Nowakowski, J. Podręczny Słownik Chemiczny; Videograf II: Katowice, Poland, 2004; ISBN 83-71-83-240-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. Griffin, G.J.L. Chemistry and Technology of Biodegradable Polymers; Chapman and Hall: Glasgow, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lourdin, D.; Coignard, L.; Bizot, H.; Colonna, P. Influence of equilibrium relative humidity and plasticizer concentration on the water content and glass transition of starch materials. Polymer 1997, 38, 5401–5406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hulleman, S.H.; Janssen, F.H.; Feil, H. The role of water during plasticization of native starches. Polymer 1998, 39, 2043–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Park, H.M.; Lee, S.R.; Chowdhury, S.R.; Kang, T.K.; Kim, H.K.; Park, S.H.; Ha, C.S. Tensile properties, morphology, and biodegradability of blends of starch with various thermoplastics. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 86, 2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Graaf, R.A.; Karman, A.P.; Janssen, L.P.B.M. Material Properties and Glass Transition Temperatures of Different Thermoplastic Starches After Extrusion Processing. Starch/Stearke 2003, 55, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mościcki, L.; Janssen, L.P.B.M.; Oniszczuk, T.; Juśko, S. Baro-thermal techniques in processing of thermoplastic starch. Acta Agrophys. 2007, 9, 431–442. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wollerdorfer, M.; Bader, H. Influence of natural fibres on the mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers. Ind. Crop. Prod. 1998, 8, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Serghat-Derradji, H.; Copinet, A.; Bureau, G.; Couturier, Y. Aerobic Biodegradation of Extruded Polymer Blends with Native Starch as Major Component. Starch 1999, 51, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malinowski, R.; Kom, T. Polimery biodegradowalne. In Commission Of Mechanical, Electrical And Civil Engineering; Publishing House of the University of Life Sciences in Lublin: Lublin, Poland, 2008; ISSN 1730-9131. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gołębiewski, J.; Gibas, E.; Malinowski, R. Wybrane polimery biodegradowalne – otrzymywanie, właściwości, zastosowanie. Polimery 2008, 53, 11–12. [Google Scholar]
  12. Murariu, M.; Da Silva Ferreira, A.; Duquesne, E.; Bonnaud, L.; Dubois, P. Polylactide (PLA) and Highly Filled PLA - Calcium Sulfate Composites with Improved Impact Properties. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fay, F.; Linossier, I.; Legendre, G.; Vallee-Rehel, K. Micro-encapsulation and antifouling coatings: Development of poly(lactic acid) microspheres containing bioactive molecules. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tomaszewski, W.; Szadkowski, M.; Libiszowski, J.; Ciechańska, D. Poly(l-lactide) Nano- and Micro-fibers by Electrospinning: Influence of Poly(l-lactide) Molecular Weight. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sarasua, J.-R.; Zuza, E.; Imaz, N.; Meaurio, E. Crystallinity and Crystalline Confinement of the Amorphous Phase in Polylactides. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Badia, J.D.; Moriana, R.; Santonja-Blasco, L.; Ribes-Greus, A. A Thermogravimetric Approach to Study the Influence of a Biodegradation in Soil Test to a Poly(lactic acid). Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sedlarik, V.; Saha, N.; Sedlarikova, J.; Saha, P. Biodegradation of Blown Films Based on Poly(lactic acid) under Natural Conditions. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kawalec, M.; Janeczek, H.; Kurcok, P.; Kowalczuk, M.; Scandola, M. The Study of Kinetics of Poly[(R,S)-3-hydroxybutyrate) Degradation Induced by Carboxylate. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Koller, M.; Atlicc, A.; Gonazalez-Garcia, Y.; Kutschera, C.; Braunegg, G. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Biosynthesis from Whey Lactose. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Velthoen, I.W.; Tijsma, E.J.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Feijen, J. Thermo-Responsive Hydrogels Based on Branched Poly(L-lactide)-poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymers. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vidivic, E.; Klee, D.; Hoecker, H. Degradation Behavior of the Hydrogel Poly(vinyl alcohol)-graft-Poly[(rac-lactide)-co-Glycolide)] under Different Conditions. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chaudhuri, J.B.; Davidson, M.G.; Ellis, M.J.; Jones, M.D.; Wu, X. Fabrication of Honeycomb-Structured Poly(DL-lactide) and Poly[(DL-lactide)-co-glycolide)] Films and their Use as Scaffolds for Osteoblast-Like Cell Culture. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Poljansek, I.; Gricar, M.; Zagar, E.; Zigon, M. Molar Mass and Structural Characteristics of Poly[(lactide-co-(aspartic acid)] Block Copolymers. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 272, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Labet, M.; Thielemans, W. Synthesis of polycaprolactone: A review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3484–3504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sinha, V.R.; Bansal, K.; Kaushik, R.; Kumria, R.; Trehan, A. Poly-epsilon-caprolactone microspheres and nanospheres: An overview. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 278, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  26. Reimschuessel, H.K. Nylon 6. J. Polym. Sci. Macromol. Rev. 1977, 12, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stevens, E.S. Green Plastics: An Introduction to the New Science of Biodegradable Plastics; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NY, USA, 2001; ISBN 9780691049670. [Google Scholar]
  28. Available online: http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/ (accessed on 20 June 2021).
  29. Available online: http://www.degradable.net/what-is-d2w/what-is-d2w/ (accessed on 19 June 2021).
  30. Parada, J.L.; Santos, J.L. Interactions between starch, lipids, and proteins in foods: Microstructure control for glycemic response modulation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 2362–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, S.; Copeland, L. Molecular disassembly of starch granules during gelatinization and its effect on starch digestibility: A review. Food Funct. 2013, 4, 1564–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.; Zheng, M.; Chao, C. Interactions Between Starch, Proteins and Lipids and the Formation of Ternary Complexes with Distinct Properties. Encycl. Food Chem. 2019, 2, 487–493. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, S.; Chao, C.; Cai, J.; Niu, B.; Copeland, L.; Wang, S. Starch–lipid and starch–lipid–protein complexes: A comprehensive review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Copeland, L.; Blazek, J.; Salman, H.; Tang, M.C. Form and functionality of starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 1527–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Putseys, J.A.; Lamberts, L.; Delcour, J.A. Amylose-inclusion complexes: Formation, identity and physico-chemical properties. J. Cereal Sci. 2010, 51, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Panyoo, A.E.; Emmambux, M.N. Amylose-lipid complex production and potential health benefits: A mini-review. Starch 2017, 69, 1600203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ioffe, V.M.; Gorbenko, G.P.; Deligeorgiev, T.; Gadjev, N.; Vasilev, A. Fluorescence study of protein-lipid complexes with a new symmetric squarylium probe. Biophys. Chem. 2007, 128, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tomasik, P.; Schilling, C.H. Starch polysaccharide hydrocolloid gels. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1998, 53, 345. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nimz, O.; Gessler, K.; Usón, I.; Sheldrick, G.M.; Saenger, W. Inclusion complexes of V-amylose with undecanoic acid and dodecanol at atomic resolution: X-ray structures with cycloamylose containing 26 D-glucoses (cyclohexaicosaose) as host. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 1427–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nomura, S.; Kyutoku, T.; Shimomura, N.; Kaneko, Y.; Kadokawa, J. Preparation of inclusion complexes composed of amylose and biodegradable poly(glycolic acid-co-ε-caprolactone) by vine-twining polymerization and their lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis behawior. Pol. J. 2011, 43, 971–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bhatnagar, S.; Hanna, M.A. Amylose-lipid complex formation during single-screw extrusion of various corn starches. Cereal Chem. 1994, 71, 582–586. [Google Scholar]
  42. Godet, M.C.; Bizot, H.; Buléon, A. Crystallization of amylose-fatty acid complexes prepared with different amylose chain lengths. Carbohydr. Polym. 1995, 27, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bhosale, R.G.; Ziegler, G.R. Preparation of spherulites from amylose–palmitic acid complexes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marinopoulou, A.; Papastergiadis, E.; Raphaelides, S.N.; Kontominas, M.G. Morphological characteristics, oxidative stability and enzymic hydrolysis of amylose-fatty acid complexes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 141, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dejewska, A.; Mazurkiewicz, J.; Tomasik, P.; Zaleska, H. Electrochemical Synthesis of Polysaccharide-Protein Complexes. Part 1: Preliminary Studies on Apple Pectin-Albumin Complexes. Starch/Stearke 1995, 47, 219–233. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zaleska, H.; Mazurkiewicz, J.; Tomasik, P.; Bączkowicz, M. Electrochemical synthesis of polysaccharide-protein complexes. Part 2. Apple pectin-casein complexes. Nahrung 1999, 43, 278. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zaleska, H.; Tomasik, P.; Ring, S. Electrosynthesis of potato starch–whey protein isolate complexes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2001, 45, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zaleska, H.; Ring, S.; Tomasik, P. Apple pectin complexes with whey protein isolate. Food Hydrocoll. 2000, 14, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zaleska, H.; Ring, S.; Tomasik, P. Electrosynthesis of potato starch-casein complexes. Int. J. Food Chem. Technol. 2001, 36, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lii, C.Y.; Tomasik, P.; Zaleska, H.; Liaw, S.C.; Lai, M.F. Carboxymethyl cellulose–gelatin complexes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2002, 50, 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  51. Grega, T.; Najgebauer, D.; Sady, M.; Tomasik, P.; Faryna, M. Biodegradable Complex Polymers from Casein and Potato Starch. J. Polym. Environ. 2003, 11, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zaleska, H.; Tomasik, P.; Lii, C.Y. Formation of carboxymethyl cellulose-casein complexes by electrosynthesis. Food Hydrocoll. 2002, 16, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zaleska, H.; Tomasik, P.; Lii, C.Y. Electrosynthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose – ovoalbumin complexes. J. Food Eng. 2002, 53, 249–257. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lii, C.Y.; Liaw, S.C.; Lai, V.M.F.; Tomasik, P. Xanthan gum–gelatin complexes. Eur. Polym. J. 2002, 38, 1377–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lii, C.Y.; Liaw, S.C.; Tomasik, P. Xanthan gum-ovalbumin complexes from electrosynthesis and coacervation. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2003, 53, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lii, C.Y.; Chan, H.H.; Tomasik, P.; Lu, S. Electrosynthesis of κ-Carrageenan Complexes with Gelatin. J. Polym. Environ. 2003, 11, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lii, C.Y.; Tomasik, P.; Hung, W.L.; Lai, V.M.F. Granular starches as dietary fiber and natural microcapsules. Int. J. Food Chem. Technol. 2003, 38, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sikora, M.; Tomasik, P.; Schilling, C.H.; Sady, M. Time-dependent characteristics of Herschel–Bulkley fluids from edible powders. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Schilling, C.H.; Tomasik, P.; Karpovich, D.S.; Shepardson, S.; Garcha, J. Preliminary Studies on Converting Agricultural Waste into Biodegradable Plastics, Part I: Corn Distillers’ Dry Grain. J. Polym. Environ. 2004, 12, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schilling, C.H.; Tomasik, P.; Karpovich, D.S.; Hart, B.; Boettcher, P.T. Preliminary Studies on Converting Agricultural Waste into Biodegradable Plastics. Part II: Corncobs. J. Polym. Environ. 2005, 13, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Schilling, C.H.; Tomasik, P.; Karpovich, D.S.; Hart, B.; Boettcher, P.T. Plastic shaping of aqueous alumina suspensions with sucrose and maltodextrin additives. J. Environ. Pol. Degr. 1995, 3, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lambert, S.; Sinclair, C.J.; Boxall, A. Occurrence, Degradation, and Effect of Polymer-Based Materials in the Environment. J. Polym. Environ. 2014, 227, 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  63. Najgebauer, D.; Grega, T.; Sady, M.; Tomasik, P. Polymeric complexes from casein and starch phosphate: Characteristics and enzyme susceptibility. J. Polym. Environ. 2003, 12, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  64. Najgebauer, D.; Grega, T.; Sady, M.; Tomasik, P. Polymeric Complexes of Cornstarch and Waxy Cornstarch Phosphates with Milk Casein and Their Performance as Biodegradable Materials. Molecules 2004, 9, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Lii, C.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Lu, S.; Tomasik, P. Electrosynthesis of κ-carrageenan–ovalbumin complexes. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 38, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Schilling, C.H.; Karpovich, D.S.; Tomasik, P. Biodegradable Plastics from Soy Protein and Polysaccharide Carboxylates. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenerg. 2009, 3, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. De Kruif, C.G.; Tuinier, R. Polysaccharide protein interactions. J. Cereal Sci. Food Hydrocoll. 2001, 15, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Martinez, K.D.; Baeza, R.I.; Millan, F.; Pilosof, A.M.R. Effect of limited hydrolysis of sunflower protein on the interactions with polysaccharides in foams. J. Cereal Sci. Food Hydrocoll. 2005, 19, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Eliasson, A.-C.; Tjerneld, E. Adsorption of Wheat Proteins on Wheat Starch Granules. Cereal Chem. 1990, 67, 366–372. [Google Scholar]
  70. Lindahl, L.; Eliasson, A.C. Effects of wheat proteins on the viscoelastic properties of starch gels. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1986, 37, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lelievre, J.; Husbands, J. Effect of sodium caseinate on the rheological properties of starch pastes. Starch/Starke 1989, 41, 236–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jamilah, B.; Mohamed, A.; Abbas, K.A.; Abdul Rahman, R.; Karim, R.; Hashim, D.M. Protein-starch interaction and their effect on thermal and rheological characteristics of a food system: A review. J. Cereal Sci. Food Agric. Environ. 2009, 7, 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  73. Bravo-Núñez, Á.; Garzón, R.; Rosell, C.M.; Gómez, M. Evaluation of Starch–Protein Interactions as a Function of pH. Foods 2019, 8, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Gennis, R.B. Biomembranes, Molecular Structure and Function; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  75. Scott, H.L., Jr.; Coe, T.J. A theoretical study of lipid-protein interactions in bilayers. Biophys. J. 1983, 42, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Mashagh, A.; Swann, M.J.; Popplewell, J.; Textor, M.; Reimhult, E. Optical anisotropy of supported lipid structures probed by waveguide spectroscopy and its application to study of supported lipid bilayer formation kinetics. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 3666–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lee, T.H.; Heng, C.; Gehman, J.D.; Aguilar, M.-I. Real-time quantitative analysis of lipid disordering by aurein 1.2 during membrane adsorption, destabilisation and lysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2010, 1798, 1977–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Sanghera, N.; Marcus JSwann, M.J.; Gerry Ronan, G.; Teresa JTPinheiro, T.J.T. Insight into early events in the aggregation of the prion protein on lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1788, 2245–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Darszon, A.; Vanderberg, C.A.; Schoenfeld, M.; Elisman, M.H.; Spitzer, N.C.; Montal, M. Reassembly of protein-lipid complexes into large bilayer vesicles: Perspectives for membrane reconstitution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Jakubke, H.D.; Jeschkeit, H. Aminokwasy, Peptydy, Białka; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1982; ISBN 83-01-08814-1. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wódzki, R. Membrany, Teoria I Praktyka; Wyd. UMK: Toruń, Poland, 2009; ISBN 83-231-1973-2. [Google Scholar]
  82. Hamilton, J.A. How fatty acids bind to proteins: The inside story from protein structures. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat.-Acid. 2002, 67, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hanhoff, T.; Lücke, C.; Spener, F. Insights into binding of fatty acids by fatty acid binding proteins. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2002, 239, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Brinkmann, C.R.; Thiel, S.; Otzen, D.E. Protein–fatty acid complexes: Biochemistry, biophysics and function. FEBS J. 2013, 280, 1733–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hamilton, J.A. Fatty acid interactions with proteins: What X-ray crystal and NMR solution structures tell us. Prog. Lipid Res. 2004, 43, 177–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Niu, B.; Chao, C.; Cai, J.; Yu, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, S. Effects of cooling rate and complexing temperature on the formation of starch-lauric acid-β-lactoglobulin complexes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 253, 117301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lin, L.; Yang, H.; Chi, C.; Ma, X. Effect of protein types on structure and digestibility of starch-protein-lipids complexes. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 134, 110175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zheng, M.; Chao, C.; Yu, J.; Copeland, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, S. Effects of chain length and degree of unsaturation of fatty acids on structure and in vitro digestibility of starch-protein-fatty acid complexes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 1872–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, S.; Zheng, M.; Yu, J.; Wang, S.; Copeland, L. Insights into the Formation and Structures of Starch-1 Protein-Lipid Complexes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 1960–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ciesielski, W.; Krystyjan, M.; Folentarska, A.; Żarska, S. A Method of Producing Three-Component Biodegradable Structures Based on Renewable Raw Materials. Polish Patent 236529, 31 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
  91. Liu, J.; Fei, L.; Maladen, M.; Hamaker, B.R.; Zhang, G. Iodine binding property of a ternary complex consisting of starch, protein, and free fatty acids. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 75, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Feng, T.; Zhuang, H.; Chen, F.; Campanella, O.; Bhopatkar, D.; Carignano, M.A.; Park, S.H. Starch-Lipid and Starch-Protein Complexes and Their Application. Funct. Starch Appl. Food 2018, 177–226. [Google Scholar]
  93. Hassan BChatha SA, S.; Hussain, A.J.; Zia, K.M.; Akhtar, N. Recent advances on polysaccharides, lipids and protein based edible films and coatings: A review. Int. J. Cereal Sci. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1095–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Mohamed SA, A.; El-Sakhawy MEl-Sakhawy, M.A.-M. Polysaccharides, Protein and Lipid -Based Natural Edible Films in Food Packaging: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ryu, S.Y.; Rhim, J.W.; Roh, H.J.; Kim, S.S. Preparation and physical properties of zein-coated highamylose corn starch film. Lebensm.-Wiss. Technol. 2002, 35, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Javanmard, M.; Ahangari, R.; Tavakkolipour, H. Effects of wheat starch edible films on rancidity and moisture uptake of pistachio kernels as a new package. J. Food Process Eng. 2011, 34, 1156–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ribeiro, C.; Vicente, A.A.; Teixeira, J.A.; Miranda, C. Optimization of edible coating composition to retard strawberry fruit senescence. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2007, 44, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Ruban, S.W. Biobased packaging-application in meat industry. Vet World 2009, 2, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gennadios, A.; Hanna, M.A.; Kurth, L.B. Application of edible coatings on meats, poultry and seafoods: A review. Lebensm.-Wiss. Technol. 1997, 30, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pająk, P. Polimery naturalne w produkcji biodegradowalnych opakowań. Laboratorium 2011, 5, 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  101. Regalado, C.; Pérez- Pérez, C.; Lara-Cortés, E.; García-Almendarez, B. Whey Protein Based Edible Food Packaging Films and Coatings; Research Signpost: Thiruvananthapuram, India, 2006; pp. 237–262. [Google Scholar]
  102. Vu, K.D.; Hollingsworth, R.G.; Salmieri, S.; Takala, P.N.; Lacroix, M. Development of bioactive coatings based on γ-irradiated proteins to preserve strawberries. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 1211–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Debeaufort, F.; Voilley, A. Edible Films and Coatings to Improve Food Quality; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 135–168. [Google Scholar]
  104. Valencia-Chamorro, S.A.; Palou, L.; Del Río María, M.A.; Pérez-Gago, B. Antimicrobial Edible Films and Coatings for Fresh and Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 872–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bravin, B.; Peressini, D.; Sensidoni, A. Influence of Emulsifier Type and Content on Functional Properties of Polysaccharide Lipid-Based Edible Films. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6448–6455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Andini, R.; Sulaiman, M.I.; Martunis, A.; Umam, A.H.; Olivia, M.; Endres, H.J. Biopolymer nanocomposites: Their mechanical, thermal, and gas barrier properties for food packaging. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 667, 012067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. la Mantia, F.P.; Ceraulo, M.; Testa, P.; Morreale, M. Biodegradable Polymers for the Production of Nets for Agricultural Product Packaging. Materials 2021, 14, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Luo, B.; Chi, M.; Zhang, Q.; Li, M.; Chen, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Min, D. Fabrication of Lignin-Based Nano Carbon Film-Copper Foil Composite with Enhanced Thermal Conductivity. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Nechita, P.; Roman, M. Review on Polysaccharides Used in Coatings for Food Packaging Papers. Coatings 2020, 10, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Krystyjan, M.; Khachatryan, G.; Grabacka, M.; Krzan, M.; Witczak, M.; Grzyb, J.; Woszczak, L. Physicochemical, Bacteriostatic, and Biological Properties of Starch/Chitosan Polymer Composites Modified by Graphene Oxide, Designed as New Bionanomaterials. Polymers 2021, 13, 2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Kasmuri, N.; Zait, S.M.A. Enhancement of Bio-plastic using Eggshells and Chitosan on Potato Starch Based. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2018, 7, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kanmani, P.; Rhim, J. Physical, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of gelatin based active nanocomposite films containing AgNPs and nanoclay. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lee, J.H.; Jeong, D.; Kanmani, P. Study on physical and mechanical properties of the biopolymer/silver based active nanocomposite films with antimicrobial activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 224, 115159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jamróz, E.; Khachatryan, G.; Kopel, P.; Juszczak, L.; Kawecka, A.; Kucharek, M.K.; Bębenek, Z.; Zimowska, M. Furcellaran nanocomposite films: The effect of nanofillers on the structural, thermal, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of biopolymer films. Carb. Polym. 2020, 240, 116244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kalpana, S.; Priyadarshini, S.; Leena, M.; Moses, J.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Intelligent packaging: Trends and applications in food systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 93, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Huang, K.-S.; Yang, C.-H.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lu, Y.-L.; Lin, Y.L. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Polymers: A Mini-Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Qiu, Y.T.; Wang, B.J.; Weng, Y.M. Preparation and characterization of genipin cross-linked and lysozyme incorporated antimicrobial sodium caseinate edible films. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wu, D.; Zhang, M.; Chen, H.; Bhandari, B. Freshness monitoring technology of fish products in intelligent packaging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 61, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Nowak, N.; Grzebieniarz, W.; Khachatryan, G.; Khachatryan, K.; Konieczna-Molenda, A.; Krzan, M.; Grzyb, J. Synthesis of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles in Sodium Alginate Matrix Enriched with Graphene Oxide and Investigation of Properties of the Obtained Thin Films. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Çakmak, K.; Özselek, Y.; Turan, O.Y.; Fıratlıgil, E.; Karbancioğlu-Güler, F. Whey protein isolate edible films incorporated with essential oils: Antimicrobial activity and barrier properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2020, 179, 109285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Chevalier, E.; Chaabani, A.; Assezat, G.; Prochazka, F.; Oulahal, N. Casein/wax blend extrusion for production of edible films as carriers of potassium sorbate—A comparative study of waxes and potassium sorbate effect. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 16, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Seydim, A.C.; Sarikus-Tutal, G.; Sogut, E. Effect of whey protein edible films containing plant essential oils on microbial inactivation of sliced Kasar cheese. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Balbinot-Alfaro, E.; Craveiro, D.; Lima, K.; Costa, H.; Lopes, D.; Prentice, C. Intelligent Packaging with pH Indicator Potential. Food Eng. Rev. 2019, 11, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Gaikwad, K.; Singh, S.; Ajji, A. Moisture absorbers for food packaging applications. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 17, 609–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Pinming, C.; Sukgorn, N.; Suhatcho, T.; Saetang, B.; Kerdkhong, P.; Maboonchuay, T.; Siraleartmukul, K. Humidity sensor using carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel membrane. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 28 June–1 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  126. Farooq, M.; Zou, T.; Riviere, G.; Sipponen, M.H.; Osterberg, M.; Strong, M. Ductile, and Waterproof Cellulose Nanofibril Composite Films with Colloidal Lignin Particles. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Indumathi, M.P.; Sarojini, K.S.; Rajarajeswari, G.R. Antimicrobial and biodegradable chitosan/cellulose acetate phthalate/ZnO nano composite films with optimal oxygen permeability and hydrophobicity for extending the shelf life of black grape fruits. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 1112–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Cichosz, S.; Masek, A.; Zaborski, M. Polymer-based sensors: A review. Polym. Test. 2018, 67, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Adhikari, B.; Majumdar, S. Polymers in sensor applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 699–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Yam, K.L.; Takhistov, P.T.; Miltz, J. Intelligent packaging: Concepts and applications. J. Food Sci. 2005, 70, R1–R10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Albuquerque, P.; Coelho, L.; Teixeira, J.A.; Carneiro-da-Cunha, M.G. Approaches in biotechnological applications of natural polymers. Aims Mol. Sci. 2016, 3, 386–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Ruck, H. Starch: From Starch Containing Sources to Isolation of Starches and Their Applications; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  133. Frasca, S.; Norol, F.; le Visage, C.; Collombet, J.M.; Letourneur, D.; Holy, X.; Ali, E.S. Calcium-phosphate ceramics and polysaccharide-based hydrogel scaffolds combined with mesenchymal stem cell differently support bone repair in rats. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2017, 28, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Wahab, I.F.; Izwan, S.; Razak, A. Polysaccharides as Composite Biomaterials. In Composites from Renewable and Sustainable Materials; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  135. Stepnowski, P.; Ciesielski, W.; Kumirska, J.; Męczykowska, H.; Folentarska, A.; Kobylis, P.; Caban, M. The valuable polar moieties on cereals-derived biochars. Coll. Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 561, 275–282. [Google Scholar]
  136. Caban, M.; Folentarska, A.; Lis, H.; Kobylis, P.; Bielicka-Giełdoń, A.; Kumirska, J.; Ciesielski, W.; Stepnowski, P. Critical study of crop-derived biochars for soil amendment and pharmaceutical ecotoxicity reduction. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 125976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Staroszczyk, H.; Ciesielski, W.; Tomasik, P. Starch—Metal complexes and metal compounds. Starch 2018, 98, 2845–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ciesielski, W.; Krystyjan, M. Starch—Metal complexes and their rheology. e-Polymers 2009, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Naik, S.N.; Goud, V.; Rout, P.; Dalai, A.K. Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 578–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ciesielski, W.; Koziol, J.; Tomasik, P. Effect of mineral salts on thermal homolytic decomposition of starch. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2001, 10, 37. [Google Scholar]
  141. Ciesielski, W.; Tomasik, P. Coordination of cassava starch to metal ions and thermolysis of resulting complexes. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiopia 2003, 17, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ciesielski, W.; Koziol, J.; Tomasik, P. Complexes of amaranthus starch with selected metal salts and their thermolysis. Thermochim. Acta 2003, 403, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ciesielski, W.; Tomasik, P.; Lii, C.Y.; Yen, M.T. Interactions of starch with salts of metals from the transition groups. Carbohydr. Polym. 2003, 51, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Nham, N.T.; Tahtamouni, T.M.A.; Nguyen, T.D.; Huong, P.T.; Jitae, K.; Viet, N.M.; Noi, N.V.; Phuong, N.M.; Ahn, N.T.H. Synthesis of iron modified rice straw biochar toward arsenic from groundwater. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 115528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Mao, H.; Zhou, D.; Hashisho, Z.; Wang, S.; Chen, H.; Wang, H. Prediction of VOCs Adsorptive Isotherms in Wheat Straw Activated Carbon Based on Dubinin-Radushkevich Model. Bull. Sci. Technol. 2014, 30, 229–231. [Google Scholar]
  146. Zhang, S.C.; Abdalla, M.A.S.; Luo, Z.J.; Xia, S.B. The wheat straw biochar research on the adsorption/desorption behaviour of mercury in wastewater. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 112, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhu, J. Straw-Based Activated Carbon: Optimization of the Preparation Procedure and Performance of Volatile Organic Compounds Adsorption. Materials 2021, 14, 3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Maheshwari, U.; Gupta, S. Performance evaluation of activated neem bark for the removal of Zn (II) and Cu (II) along with other metal ions from aqueous solution and synthetic pulp & paper industry effluent using fixed-bed reactor. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2016, 102, 547–557. [Google Scholar]
  149. Balarak, D.; Bazrafshan, E.; Mahdavi, Y.; Lee, S. Kinetic, isotherms and thermodynamic studies in the removal of 2-chlorophenol from aqueous solution using modified rice straw. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 63, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Naeem, M.A.; Imran, M.; Amjad, M.; Abbas, G.; Tahir, M.; Murtaza, B.; Zakir, A.; Shahid, M.; Bulgariu, L.; Ahmad, I. Batch and Column Scale Removal of Cadmium from Water Using Raw and Acid Activated Wheat Straw Biochar. Water 2019, 11, 1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Park, J.H.; Ok, Y.S.; Kim, S.H.; Cho, J.S.; Heo, J.S.; Delaune, R.D.; Seo, D.C. Competitive adsorption of heavy metals onto sesame straw biochar in aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 2016, 142, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Vassileva, P.S.; Radoykova, T.H.; Detcheva, A.K.; Avramova, I.A.; Aleksieva, K.I.; Nenkova, S.K.; Valchev, I.V.; Mehandjiev, D.R. Adsorption of Ag+ ions on hydrolyzed lignocellulosic materials based on willow, paulownia, wheat straw and maize stalks. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 1319–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Daud, W.M.A.W.; Ali, W.S.W.; Sulaiman, M.Z. The effects of carbonization temperature on pore development in palm-shell-based activated carbon. Carbon 2000, 38, 1925–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Pui, W.K.; Yusoff, R.; Aroua, M.K. A review on activated carbon adsorption for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Rev. Chem. Eng. 2019, 35, 649–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Vivo-Vilches, J.F.; Bailón-García, E.; Pérez-Cadenas, A.F.; Carrasco-Marín, F.; Maldonado-Hódar, F.J. Tailoring the surface chemistry and porosity of activated carbons: Evidence of reorganization and mobility of oxygenated surface groups. Carbon 2014, 68, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Yang, Q.L.; Wu, P.X.; Liu, J.; Rehman, S.; Ahmed, Z.; Ruan, B.; Zhu, N.W. Batch interaction of emerging tetracycline contaminant with novel phosphoric acid activated corn straw porous carbon: Adsorption rate and nature of mechanism. Environ. Res. 2020, 181, 108899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yin, Y.Y.; Guo, X.Y.; Peng, D. Iron and manganese oxides modified maize straw to remove tylosin from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 2018, 205, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Guo, X.T.; Yin, Y.Y.; Yang, C.; Dang, Z. Maize straw decorated with sulfide for tylosin removal from the water. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 152, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. De Boer, F.Y.; Imhof, A.; Krassimir, P.V.; Velikov, P. Encapsulation of colorants by natural polymers for food application. Color. Technol. 2019, 135, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Khachatryan, K.; Khachatryan, L.; Krzan, M.; Krystyjan, M.; Fiedorowicz, L.K.; Lenart-Boron, A.; Koronowicz, A.; Drozdowska, M.; Khachatryan, G. Formation and Investigation of Physicochemical, Biological and Bacteriostatic Properties of Nanocomposite Foils Containing Silver Nanoparticles and Graphene Oxide in Hyaluronic Acid Matrix. Materials 2021, 14, 3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Souza, P.R.; De Oliveira, C.C.; Vilsinski, H.B.; Kipper, M.J.; Martins, A.F. Polysaccharide-Based Materials Created by Physical Processes: From Preparation to Biomedical Applications. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Chen, X.; He, X.-W.; Fu, B.Z.X.; Jane, J.-l.; Huang, Q. Effects of Adding Corn Oil and Soy Protein to Corn Starch on the Physicochemical and Digestive Properties of the Starch. Int. J. Cereal Sci. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Proposed structure of saccharide-stearic acid.
Figure 1. Proposed structure of saccharide-stearic acid.
Polymers 13 02925 g001
Figure 2. Proposed structure of saccharide-protein.
Figure 2. Proposed structure of saccharide-protein.
Polymers 13 02925 g002
Figure 3. Proposed structure of stearic acid-protein.
Figure 3. Proposed structure of stearic acid-protein.
Polymers 13 02925 g003
Figure 4. Thermomechanical method for preparation of ternary complex in a Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA).
Figure 4. Thermomechanical method for preparation of ternary complex in a Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA).
Polymers 13 02925 g004
Figure 5. Most popular biopolymers in food coating.
Figure 5. Most popular biopolymers in food coating.
Polymers 13 02925 g005
Figure 6. Fabrication of polysaccharides for non-food industry.
Figure 6. Fabrication of polysaccharides for non-food industry.
Polymers 13 02925 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Folentarska, A.; Łagiewka, J.; Krystyjan, M.; Ciesielski, W. Biodegradable Binary and Ternary Complexes from Renewable Raw Materials. Polymers 2021, 13, 2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13172925

AMA Style

Folentarska A, Łagiewka J, Krystyjan M, Ciesielski W. Biodegradable Binary and Ternary Complexes from Renewable Raw Materials. Polymers. 2021; 13(17):2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13172925

Chicago/Turabian Style

Folentarska, Agnieszka, Jakub Łagiewka, Magdalena Krystyjan, and Wojciech Ciesielski. 2021. "Biodegradable Binary and Ternary Complexes from Renewable Raw Materials" Polymers 13, no. 17: 2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13172925

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop