Next Article in Journal
Formation and Electrochemical Evaluation of Polyaniline and Polypyrrole Nanocomposites Based on Glucose Oxidase and Gold Nanostructures
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical and Dynamic Behavior of an Elastic Rubber Layer with Recycled Styrene-Butadiene Rubber Granules
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Monitoring of Peroxide in Gamma Irradiated EVA Multilayer Film Using Methionine Probe

Polymers 2020, 12(12), 3024; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12123024
by Nina Girard-Perier 1,2,3, Magalie Claeys-Bruno 2,*, Sylvain R. A. Marque 3,*, Nathalie Dupuy 2,*, Fanny Gaston 1 and Samuel Dorey 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2020, 12(12), 3024; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12123024
Submission received: 28 October 2020 / Revised: 4 December 2020 / Accepted: 14 December 2020 / Published: 17 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Chemistry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In addition to the scientific, this manuscript has a practical significance as well, because it develops methods for defining the storage conditions in single-use bags (dry and with the contents). The experiments are well designed, the results are clearly presented and the following few things should be changed:

  1. Lines 152 and 153. "Figure 3. Plot of storage time vs concentration of methionine oxide generated to exemplify the three responses used in the experimental design." The figure shows the methionine sulfoxide. The names given at the figure and figure signature must to be harmonized.
  2. In the Table 2 is given "Oxidized methionine concentration". The unit for the concentration of oxidized methionine is not shown here. This need to be supplemented.
  3. Lines 125 and 126. "Scheme 2. Formation of methionine sulfoxide." The scheme does not show the formula of methionine and its oxidation. Scheme with the exact formula of methionine need to be written.

Author Response

In addition to the scientific, this manuscript has a practical significance as well, because it develops methods for defining the storage conditions in single-use bags (dry and with the contents). The experiments are well designed, the results are clearly presented, and the following few things should be changed:

  1. Lines 152 and 153. "Figure 3. Plot of storage time vs concentration of methionine oxide generated to exemplify the three responses used in the experimental design." The figure shows the methionine sulfoxide. The names given at the figure and figure signature must be harmonized.

We changed the name: Figure 3. Plot of storage time vs methionine sulfoxide concentration generated to exemplify the three responses used in the experimental design.

  1. In the Table 2 is given "Oxidized methionine concentration". The unit for the concentration of oxidized methionine is not shown here. This need to be supplemented.

We added the unit: µM.

  1. Lines 125 and 126. "Scheme 2. Formation of methionine sulfoxide." The scheme does not show the formula of methionine and its oxidation. Scheme with the exact formula of methionine need to be written.

We modified the scheme of the methionine in the article.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a very nice work. The experiments are well planned and the results are very well presented.

   I suggest that the authors present a comparison between methionine and homocysteine.

I want the authors to check whether the same result, i.e., sulfoxide formation is observed in homocysteine.

This will illustrate the role of the methyl group bound to sulfur in these results.

I want to review the revised manuscript.

Author Response

In article[1], Du et al. showed that the cysteine is readily oxidized in several compounds. Detection and titration of cysteine oxidation products is not straightforward; therefore, homocysteine is expected to react in the same way as cysteine.

For us, the role of methyl in methionine is to control the oxidation process (i.e. formation of methionine sulfoxide and methionine sulfone readily detected by HPLC), in sharp contrast to oxidation of cysteine (see Figure 1).

Thus, as literature describes the reaction of cysteine with peracetic acid (same reactivity is expected for homocysteine as for any linear alkyl thiols) and as the benefit of such experiment is not obvious for the article, the experiments suggested are not performed. Nevertheless, if the Editor think that such experiments are crucial for the article, we will comply.

Figure 1: Proposed reaction pathways for cysteine oxidation by peracetic acid.

[1]        P. Du, W. Liu, H. Cao, H. Zhao, C.-H. Huang, Oxidation of amino acids by peracetic acid: Reaction kinetics, pathways and theoretical calculations, Water Research X. 1 (2018) 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2018.09.002.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Accept in the present form

Back to TopTop