Next Article in Journal
Evaluation on the Methane Production Potential of Wood Waste Pretreated with NaOH and Co-Digested with Pig Manure
Next Article in Special Issue
(±)-trans-1,2-Cyclohexanediamine-Based Bis(NHC) Ligand for Cu-Catalyzed Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
Valorization of Olive By-Products as Substrates for the Cultivation of Ganoderma lucidum and Pleurotus ostreatus Mushrooms with Enhanced Functional and Prebiotic Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tetracopper(II) Cores Driven by an Unexplored Trifunctional Aminoalcohol Sulfonic Acid for Mild Catalytic C–H Functionalization of Alkanes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/catal9060538
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heterogeneous Bimetallic Cu–Ni Nanoparticle-Supported Catalysts in the Selective Oxidation of Benzyl Alcohol to Benzaldehyde

by
Lili Liu
*,
Xiaojing Zhou
,
Li Liu
,
Shuai Jiang
,
Yingjie Li
,
Luxia Guo
,
Shijuan Yan
and
Xishi Tai
*
School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering and Environmental Engineering, Weifang University, Weifang 261061, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2019, 9(6), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060538
Submission received: 10 May 2019 / Revised: 1 June 2019 / Accepted: 12 June 2019 / Published: 17 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transition Metal Complexes as Catalysts in Organic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Three bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticle-supported catalysts were synthesized by co-immobilization followed by H2 reduction. A chromium(III) terephthalate metal organic framework (MIL-101), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and carbon (C) with different properties (acidity and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area) were selected as supports for studying the effect of the support nature on the catalytic activity and selectivity in the oxidation of benzyl alcohol. The physicochemical properties of the Cu–Ni-supported catalysts were characterized by XRD, NH3-TPD, nitrogen adsorption/desorption, TEM, EDS, XPS, and ICP-OES. Bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticles were highly dispersed on the support. The catalytic activities of CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C were tested in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde in the presence of molecular oxygen under mild reaction conditions. The highest benzaldehyde yields were achieved with CuNi/TiO2, CuNi/MIL-101, and CuNi/C catalysts at 100 °C within 4 h under 5, 3, and 3 bar of O2, respectively. The bimetallic Cu–Ni-supported catalysts possessed two types of catalytic active sites: acid sites and bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticles. The CuNi/MIL-101 catalyst possessed a high number of acid sites and exhibited high yield during selective benzyl alcohol oxidation to benzaldehyde. Importantly, the catalysts exhibited a high functional group (electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups) tolerance. Cu–Ni-supported catalysts with an Cu:Ni mole ratio of 1:1 exhibited the highest yield of 47% for the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde. Reusability and leaching experiment results exhibited that CuNi/MIL-101 showed better stability than CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C catalysts due to the large porous cavities of MIL-101 support; these cavities can be used to trap bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticles and inhibit nanoparticle leaching.

1. Introduction

Benzaldehyde is a valuable precursor for the production of perfumes, pharmaceuticals, dyestuffs, and agrochemicals [1]. Conventionally, benzaldehyde is synthesized by the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol in the presence of inorganic oxidants such as KMnO4, CrO3, MnO2, and Br2 [2]. However, these reagents may produce high amounts of waste and hazardous/toxic compounds during selective oxidation, which may result in intensive environmental problems [3]. Therefore, developing green catalytic processes under mild conditions is necessary to produce clean benzaldehyde by benzyl alcohol oxidation.
Recently, supported noble metals, such as Au, Pd, Ru, Au–Pd, Au–Ag, and Au–Ni, have been reported to exhibit high catalytic activities in selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde under mild conditions [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, these noble metals, as limited resources, are expensive. On the other hand, non-noble metal-supported catalysts may be an alternative to noble metals for the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol [12]. Cruz et al. [12] reported that copper and copper oxide nanoparticles supported on SBA-15 showed good catalytic activity and selectivity in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde. Fu et al. [13] revealed that Ni–Co bimetallic oxide nanoparticles supported on N-doped FDU-15 featured high benzyl alcohol conversion (93.4%) and excellent benzaldehyde selectivity (97.8%) when air was used as the oxidant at 110 °C. Bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticles supported on activated carbon also showed good catalytic performance with a 46.8% conversion for benzyl alcohol oxidation to benzaldehyde using hydrogen peroxide as the oxidizing agent at 80 °C within 2 h in toluene [14]. Thus, the development of selective oxidation catalytic processes using inexpensive metals such as Cu, Cu–Ni, and Ni–Co, is vital for achieving economic efficiency.
Metal–organic frameworks (Cu(II)-MOF,-101 ZIF-8, and MIL-101), metal oxides (TiO2, Al2O3, MgO, and MnO2), and carbon (C) are widely used as the support for the selective oxidation of alcohols [4,9,10,11,14,15,16,17]. To optimize the performance of catalysts, it is essential to understand the effect of the support on the catalytic activity for the selective oxidation reaction [18]. However, the effect of the acidity and surface properties of the support on the catalytic performance has not investigated in detail. Thus in this work, bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticles supported on a representative chromium(III) terephthalate metal organic framework MIL-101, TiO2, and C were synthesized by co-immobilization followed by H2 reduction. The catalytic activities of CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C were studied for the oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde using molecular oxygen (O2) as the green oxidant. The reaction conditions such as type of solvent, reaction time, reaction pressure, and reaction temperature were optimized in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol in the presence of bimetallic Cu–Ni supported-catalysts. Furthermore, we attempted to establish the relationship between the catalytic performance and properties of the supports. The scope of substances and stability of catalysts in selective oxidation were also investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalyst Synthesis and Characterization

We selected a chromium(III) terephthalate metal organic framework MIL-101, TiO2, and C as supports to study the effect of support nature on the catalytic activity and selectivity in benzyl alcohol oxidation. MIL-101 was synthesized by a hydrothermal method at 220 °C for 18 h by using chromium(III) nitrate nonahydrate (Cr(NO3)3·9H2O), terephthalic acid, and deionized water without the addition of toxic and corrosive hydrofluoric acid [19]. The as-synthesized MIL-101 was further purified using hot ethanol at 90 °C to remove the remaining unreacted terephthalic acid trapped in the pores and dried subsequently in a vacuum oven at 150 °C for 12 h to remove the terminal water molecules. The purchased TiO2 and C were used as received without any further modification. The physicochemical properties of the supports and Cu–Ni-supported catalysts were determined and are summarized in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the adsorption–desorption isotherms of nitrogen for the supports and Cu–Ni-supported catalysts. All samples exhibited a typical type IV isotherm. The MIL-101 and C samples presented a hysteretic loop due to capillary condensation, which is representative of porous materials [20]. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of MIL-101, TiO2, and C were measured as 1186.0, 15.2, and 94.9 m2/g, respectively. The trend of BET surface areas for the supports follows the order MIL-101 > C > TiO2. The BET surface areas of CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C were determined to be 1119.2, 8.5 and 55.6 m2/g, respectively. Notably, the surface area of the Cu–Ni-supported catalysts decreased significantly when compared with that of MIL-101, TiO2, and C due to the immobilization of the Cu–Ni nanoparticles inside the pores. Similar results have been observed in other samples after the immobilization of metal nanoparticles [10,19]. The total pore volume calculated by the Barrett Joyer Halenda model from the nitrogen desorption isotherm reached 0.49, 0.45, 0.014, 0.0078, 0.11, and 0.079 cm3/g for MIL-101, CuNi/MIL-101, TiO2, CuNi/TiO2, C, and CuNi/C, respectively. The corresponding mean pore diameters were 2.8, 2.5, 4.3, 4.7, 4.6, and 5.2 nm for MIL-101, CuNi/MIL-101, TiO2, CuNi/TiO2, C, and CuNi/C, respectively. Ammonia temperature programmed desorption (NH3-TPD) was used to measure the acidic properties of the MIL-101, TiO2, and C supports, and the results are shown in Figure 2. Three peaks were observed on the spectra of MIL-101 in the range of 40 °C–600 °C, whereas one broad peak was observed on the spectra of TiO2 and C. The low-temperature desorption peak centered at approximately 270 °C was attributed to adsorbed NH3 on Lewis acid sites, whereas the high-temperature desorption peak at approximately 340 °C was assigned to Brønsted acid sites [21,22,23,24,25]. TiO2 contained only Brønsted acid sites, C mainly possessed Lewis acid sites, and MIL-101 preliminarily included Lewis and Brønsted acid sites. For MIL-101, the peak at 443.8 °C was attributed to its structural decomposition. MIL-101 contained more adsorption sites for NH3 than TiO2 and C. The numbers of Lewis and Brønsted acid centers located at 264. 6 °C and 361.7 °C for MIL-101 reached 0.705 and 3.308 mmol/g, respectively. However, extremely low peaks at 336.1 °C and 275.6 °C were noted in the NH3-TPD curves of TiO2 and C, with the amounts of acid sites reaching 0.062 and 0.039 mmol/g, respectively. CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C catalysts were prepared by a co-immobilization method, followed by treatment with a stream of H2 (12 mL/min) for 2 h at 50 °C. Figure 3 shows the x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of MIL-101, CuNi/MIL-101, TiO2, CuNi/TiO2, C, and CuNi/C. MIL-101 and CuNi/MIL-101 presented similar XRD patterns (Figure 3a), thereby proving the preservation of the crystal structures of MIL-101 after loading of the Cu–Ni nanoparticles [26,27]. Based on the XRD patterns, only the rutile phase was observed in TiO2 (Figure 3b) [28,29]. The main diffraction peak of TiO2 was revealed at 2θ = 27.7°, which represents the rutile (110) phase [28]. The XRD patterns of TiO2 showed no peak corresponding to the anatase (101) phase at 2θ = 25.3° [29]. As shown in the XRD patterns of TiO2, other diffraction peaks appeared at 2θ = 36.4°, 39.5°, 41.6°, 44.4°, 54.7°, 57.0°, 63.1°, 64.3°, 69.2°, 70.1°, and 76.9°, which were consistent with the rutile phase of TiO2. By comparing the XRD pattern of CuNi/TiO2 with that of TiO2, the CuO and NiO nanoparticle loading introduced no significant changes in the TiO2 structure (Figure 3b). The lattice plane of graphite (JCPDS, File No. 74-2330) was noted in Figure 3c. The characteristic peak at 2θ = 24.8° in the XRD patterns was associated with the (002) of carbon support (Figure 3c) [30,31,32]. Furthermore, characteristic CuO and NiO peaks were absent in the XRD patterns of CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C due to the low amounts of Cu and Ni in the catalysts [33,34].
We conducted XPS measurements to investigate the chemical state of Cu and Ni in the CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C catalysts. Figure 4 shows the Cu 2p and Ni 2p XPS spectra of the as-prepared CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C catalysts. For all of the catalysts, two peaks at 932.5 and 952.5 eV were attributed to Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2, respectively, thereby suggesting the presence of Cu2+ in the catalysts [35]. Furthermore, two satellite peaks of Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2 were detected, thereby further confirming the existence of Cu2+ [36,37]. The oxidized Ni of Ni2+ 2p3/2 and Ni2+ 2p1/2 were detected at the binding energies of 856.6 and 874.0 eV, respectively, in the Ni 2p spectra of CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C possibly due to oxidation of the catalysts exposed to air [11,38]. The peaks at 861.8 and 880.2 eV were assigned to satellites in all the catalysts [39].
The morphology of the as-synthesized CuNi/MIL-101 catalyst obtained via co-immobilization followed by H2 reduction was determined by transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Figure 5a–c). Line scanning analysis of CuNi/MIL-101 was also determined via energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS), as observed in Figure 5d. The CuNi/MIL-101 catalyst exhibited a micro sized but well-defined cuboidal morphology. EDS line scanning profiles revealed that Cu and Ni were homogeneously distributed throughout the entire MIL-101, thereby indicating the formation of a CuNi alloy structure. The morphology of the CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C catalysts was characterized by TEM. Figure 6 displays the TEM images of CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C. Figure 6 indicates that the CuNi/TiO2 particles aggregated, but exhibited remarkable rutile structures and grain interfaces. The TEM image of CuNi/C showed that the catalyst exhibited the morphology of spherical particles with a mean diameter size of 10–30 nm (Figure 6).

2.2. Benzyl Alcohol Oxidation Using Cu–Ni Bimetallic Catalysts

The catalytic activities of the as-prepared Cu–Ni-supported catalysts for benzyl alcohol oxidation were determined with molecular oxygen as a green oxidant. To avoid producing benzoic acid and benzyl benzoate, we conducted a series of reactions to obtain the optimal reaction conditions to produce benzaldehyde. First, the effects of reaction time on benzyl alcohol conversion, benzaldehyde selectivity, and yield of the CuNi/TiO2, CuNi/MIL-101, and CuNi/C catalysts were studied. The oxidation reaction was kept at 100 °C under 5 bar of O2, and the results are presented in Figure 7. For all of the catalysts, the conversion of benzyl alcohol increased with the prolonged reaction time. However, the selectivity of benzaldehyde decreased at a reaction time above 2 h. The yields of benzaldehyde did show an increase after the reaction time reached up to 4 h for the CuNi/TiO2, CuNi/MIL-101, and CuNi/C catalysts, therefore, the optical reaction time was set at 4 h for all of the catalysts. Maximum yields of 32.7%, 41.5%, and 34.8% were obtained within 4 h for CuNi/TiO2, CuNi/MIL-101, and CuNi/C, respectively. CuNi/MIL-101 presented a higher benzaldehyde yield than CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C. The acidity of the support substantially influenced the product selectivity. According to the NH3-TPD measurement, the values of the acid sites for MIL-101, TiO2, and C reached 4.013, 0.062, and 0.039 mmol/g, respectively. The highest yield was observed in CuNi/MIL-101, which contained more acid sites in benzyl alcohol oxidation to benzaldehyde, in accordance with previously reported results [11,14]. Benzaldehyde selectivity was lower in the base N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) than in the THF and 1,4-dioxane solvents over the AuNi/MIL-101-1 catalyst [11]. The acid sites of the supports also played a crucial role in benzyl alcohol oxidation. A blank experiment showed that benzyl alcohol conversions reached 25.8%, 13.6%, and 12.9% at 100 °C under 5 bar of O2 within 4 h over the MIL-101, TiO2, and C supports, respectively (Table 1, entries 1–3). MIL-101 with more acid sites showed higher catalytic activity than TiO2 and C. Notably, the conversions of benzyl alcohol amounted to 54.9%, 62.8%, and 64.3% at 100 °C under 5 bar of O2 within 4 h for CuNi/TiO2, CuNi/MIL-101, and CuNi/C, respectively. Higher benzyl alcohol conversions were observed for Cu–Ni supported catalysts than the supports (MIL-101, TiO2, and C) without Cu–Ni particle loading. These results confirm that bimetallic Cu–Ni-supported catalysts possess two types of catalytic active sites: Lewis/Brønsted acid sites and bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticles.
Second, conditions such as the type of solvent, reaction pressure, and temperature were optimized in the oxidation of benzyl alcohol in the presence of Cu–Ni bimetallic catalysts under magnetic stirring (500 rpm). Table 1 summarizes the results. Selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol in organic solvents such as dioxane, DMF, acetonitrile, and THF were investigated by CuNi/TiO2, CuNi/MIL-101, and CuNi/C at 100 °C for 4 h under 5 bar, 3 bar, and 5 bar of O2. The best catalytic performance was observed in THF (Table 2, entries 4–7, 13–16, and 22–25). Moreover, in the optimization of the reaction temperature of the CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C catalysts for the oxidation of benzyl alcohol, benzyl alcohol conversion continuously increased with increasing reaction temperature from 80 °C to 120 °C, along with a decreased benzaldehyde selectivity as oxidation is usually endothermic; thus, deep oxidation of benzaldehyde to benzoic acid easily occurred at high reaction temperatures (Table 2, entries 7–9, 16–18, and 26–28) [40]. The highest yield was obtained at 100 °C for all catalysts (Table 2, entries 7–9, 16–18, and 26–28). Oxidation of benzyl alcohol was conducted with different reaction pressures (1–7 bar) to determine the proper reaction pressure for Cu–Ni bimetallic catalysts (Table 2, entries 7, 10–12, 16, 19–20, 25, and 28–30). Increasing the reaction pressure can increase the conversion of benzyl alcohol. However, the selectivity to benzaldehyde decreased due to the appearance of over-oxidized products [41,42]. The highest yields of benzaldehyde were achieved in the CuNi/TiO2, CuNi/MIL-101, and CuNi/C catalysts at 100 °C under 5, 3, and 3 bar of O2, respectively. Further increasing the reaction pressure to 7 bar of O2 caused no substantial increase in benzyl alcohol conversion, but significantly decreased the selectivity to benzaldehyde for the CuNi/MIL-101 and CuNi/C catalysts (Table 2, entries 12, 21, and 30).
To examine the scope of the selective oxidation reaction, we extended the catalytic protocol to other alcohols including 4-methylbenzyl alcohol, 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol, and n-butanol, the results of which are listed in Table 3. Aromatic alcohols including those bearing functional groups such as alkoxy, alkyl, and chloro were converted to the corresponding aldehydes, and afforded good catalytic activity in the selective oxidation reaction (Table 3, entries 1–3). Conversions of 4-methylbenzyl alcohol, 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, and 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol were 73.8%, 87.9%, and 87.3% at 100 °C under 5 bar of O2 within 4 h, respectively (Table 3, entries 1–3). The selectivities of the aldehydes reached 24.4%, 28.3%, and 25.2% when 4-methylbenzyl alcohol, 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, and 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol were used, respectively (Table 3, entries 1–3). The experimental data showed that the functional groups including electron-donating (alkoxy and alkyl) and electron-withdrawing (chloro) groups on the phenyl ring resulted in negligible effects on the conversions and selectivities (Table 3, entries 1–3). n-Butanol as the linear alcohol was also successfully oxidized to the corresponding compounds. The conversion and selectivity of n-butyl aldehyde reached 74.9% and 26.2%, respectively (Table 3, entry 4).
The catalytic activity of Cu–Ni-supported catalysts with different Cu:Ni mole ratios for the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol were also investigated at 100 °C within 4 h under 3 bar of O2 in THF (Table 4). The results showed that the benzyl alcohol conversion, benzaldehyde selectivity, and yield depended strongly on the mole ratio of Cu:Ni for the oxidation of benzyl alcohol. The yields of benzaldehyde amounted to 33.6%, 42.6%, 47.0%, 36.0%, and 30.3% at 100 °C under 3 bar of O2 within 4 h for Cu(3)Ni/MIL-101, Cu(2)Ni/MIL-101, CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi(2)/MIL-101, and CuNi(3)/MIL-101, respectively. The highest yield was shown by the CuNi/MIL-101 catalyst, suggesting that Cu–Ni-supported catalysts with a Cu:Ni mole ratio of 1:1 presented its optimal proportion on MIL-101.
The reusability of catalysts in the oxidation reaction of benzyl alcohol was tested at 100 °C under 5 bar of O2 (Figure 8). A slight decrease in catalytic activity occurred after the fourth run, thereby demonstrating the good stability of CuNi/MIL-101 under the reaction conditions (Figure 8a). However, the catalytic activity was considerably affected by the reuse of the CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C catalysts (Figure 8b,c). Benzyl alcohol conversion decreased from 54.9% to 23.7% in four consecutive runs over the CuNi/TiO2 catalyst, whereas the selectivity toward benzaldehyde approximated 99% in the second, third, and fourth cycles (Figure 8b). A significant decrease was also observed in the conversion of benzyl alcohol from 64.3% to 12.2% for CuNi/C after four reaction cycles. The BET surface areas measured 1186.0, 15.2, and 94.9 m2/g for MIL-101, TiO2, and C, respectively. Total pore volume reached 0.49, 0.014, and 0.11 cm3/g for MIL-101, TiO2, and C, respectively. The large porous cavities of MIL-101 can be used to trap bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticles and inhibit nanoparticle leaching. CuNi/MIL-101 displayed better stability than the CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C catalysts. The decline in the catalytic activity was possibly due to the leaching of metals (Cu and Ni) under experimental conditions (Figure 8b,c).
The stability of the Cu–Ni-supported catalysts was studied. The XRD patterns of fresh and recycled CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C are shown in Figure 9. The characteristic peak intensity of the recycled CuNi/MIL-101 decreased severely, suggesting that the structure of the recycled CuNi/MIL-101 was slightly destroyed during the oxidation of benzyl alcohol under present reaction conditions (Figure 9a). The XRD patterns of CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C after four runs were similar to those of the as-prepared CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C (Figure 9b,c). Such a similarity illustrates that recycled CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C retained their structure integrity after four runs under the present reaction condition [43]. Figure 10 shows the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for recycled CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C. All of the recycled catalysts displayed a type IV isotherm. The BET surface areas of the recycled CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C were 632.0, 7.2, 21.3 m2/g, respectively. The BET surface area decreased significantly for the recycled Cu–Ni-supported catalysts when compared with that of the as-prepared. The decrease in the BET surface area could be due to the collapse of the structure or/and the substrate/solvents blocking the pores of the support [10].
The leaching of the CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C catalysts was tested to further investigate the stability of the catalysts. This process was conducted by stopping the benzyl alcohol oxidation reaction after 2 h at 100 °C under 5 bar of O2 using THF as the solvent and by separating the reaction mixture from the catalyst via centrifugation. Benzyl alcohol conversions reached 22.9%, 32.8%, and 31.9% at 100 °C under 5 bar of O2 within 2 h over CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C, respectively. Furthermore, the reaction solution was reused and the entire reaction was continued for another 2 h under the same reaction conditions. Benzyl alcohol conversion increased by 4.8%, 14.6%, and 8.9% after reacting for another 2 h for CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C, respectively, thereby implying the leaching of active species after the removal of the solid catalyst. The Cu and Ni contents in the reaction solutions after removal of CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C were 0.00014 and 0.0024, 0.11 and 0.10, and 0.010 and 0.060 wt%, respectively, as determined by ICP-OES, which were consistent with the leaching results.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

TiO2 (rutile, 99.99%) was purchased from Macklin and used without further purification. C (99.5%, 30 nm), nickel nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, 99.99%), n-butanol (99.9%), 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol (98%), and 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol were supplied by Aladdin Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Copper nitrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, 99%) and 4-methyl benzyl alcohol (99%) were obtained from Adamas-Beta Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Benzyl alcohol, THF, and ethanol were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China).

3.2. Preparation of Catalysts

MIL-101 was prepared following a method described in the literature [23]. Cu–Ni bimetallic catalysts were prepared by co-immobilization followed by H2 reduction. A typical procedure for the preparation of the CuNi/MIL-101 catalyst is described as follows. First, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (0.4 mmol, 96.6 mg) and Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.4 mmol, 116.3 mg) were dissolved in 2 mL ethanol. Subsequently, the solution was dropwise added to MIL-101 (0.5 g) and sonicated for 1 h in an ultrasonic cleaner. Finally, the mixture was left to stand for 12 h at room temperature, dried under vacuum for 8 h at 50 °C, and reduced at 50 °C in H2 flow (12 mL/min) for 2 h. The obtained catalyst was labeled CuNi/MIL-101. CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C catalysts were prepared using the same procedure, but differed due to changing the MIL-101 support to TiO2 and C. The actual Cu and Ni contents in the CuNi/MIL-101, CuNi/TiO2, and CuNi/C catalysts were 3.15 and 2.80, 3.53 and 3.46, and 2.62 and 2.33 wt%, respectively, as determined by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) optical emission spectroscopy. Four different bimetallic Cu:Ni catalysts supported on MIL-101 were also prepared by co-immobilization followed by H2 reduction, with a total metal loading of ca. 6%. The as-synthesized catalysts were labelled as Cu(3)Ni/MIL-101, Cu(2)Ni/MIL-101, CuNi(2)/MIL-101, and CuNi(3)/MIL-101 on the basis of the mole ratio of Cu and Ni.

3.3. Catalyst Characterization

The details of the characterizations with XRD, XPS, nitrogen adsorption/desorption, and ICP atomic emission spectroscopy analysis are the same as those in our previous work [10]. TEM images were recorded with a Jeol JEM-1210 transmission electron microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) with a high-angle annular dark-field detector. EDS line-scanning profile analysis was performed on an Oxford X-MaxN 80T IE250 spectroscopy instrument (Oxford, UK). NH3-TPD analyses of MIL-101, TiO2, and C supports were conducted on a MicrotracBEL AutoChem BELCAT II Chemisorption Analyzer (Bel, Osaka, Japan).

3.4. Selective Oxidation of Benzyl Alcohol

Selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol with molecular oxygen was conducted in a stainless-steel high-pressure reactor equipped with magnetic stirring and a temperature controller under mild conditions. In a typical experiment, 0.2 mmol benzyl alcohol, 40 mg catalyst, and 1.5 mL solvent were mixed in a 10 mL stainless-steel high-pressure reactor. The system was pumped five times with pure O2 to remove air prior to the reaction. Subsequently, the reactor was immersed in a methylsilicon oil bath at 100 °C under 5 bar of O2 to initiate the reaction. After the reaction, the mixture was centrifuged to remove the catalyst particles completely. The remaining solution was analyzed with a gas chromatograph (GC-6890, Purkinje General instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) equipped with a SE-54 capillary column and flame ionization detector. Reaction products were identified by comparison with known standard samples, and an external standard method was used for the qualitative analysis of the amounts of the reactants consumed (conversion) and products generated (selectivity). In the recycling experiment, the catalysts were separated from the mixture by centrifugation after each run, and washed with ethanol twice. Finally, the catalysts were dried at 50 °C for 4 h in a vacuum at 0.1 MPa for the next reaction.

4. Conclusions

A series of bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticles supported on MIL-101, TiO2, and C was successfully prepared using co-immobilization followed by H2 reduction for the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde using molecular oxygen as the oxidizing agent. The acidity of the supports and Cu:Ni mole ratios substantially influenced the catalytic performance of the oxidation of benzyl alcohol into benzaldehyde. The CuNi/MIL-101 catalyst possessing more acid sites showed the highest yield for the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to the corresponding aldehyde at 100 °C. Additionally, the CuNi/MIL-101 catalyst exhibited a high functional group (electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups) tolerance. The CuNi/MIL-101 catalyst also displayed better stability than the CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C catalysts due to the large porous cavities of the MIL-101 support. These findings emphasize the potential of developing new heterogeneous catalytic systems for the oxidation of benzyl alcohol under mild conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology and Writing—original draft preparation, L.L. (Lili Liu) and X.T.; Investigation—experiments and analyses, S.J., Y.L., L.G., and S.Y.; Writing—review and editing, X.Z. and L.L. (Li Liu).

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 21802104) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (grant number ZR2017MB056).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gong, X.; Liu, B.; Zhang, G.; Xu, G.; Zhao, T.; Shi, D.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, J. A mild and environmentally benign strategy towards hierarchical CeO2/Au nanoparticle assemblies with crystal facet-enhanced catalytic effects for benzyl alcohol aerobic oxidation. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 5110–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Harada, T.; Ikeda, S.; Hashimoto, F.; Sakata, T.; Ikeue, K.; Torimoto, T.; Matsumura, M. Catalytic activity and regeneration property of a Pd nanoparticle encapsulated in a hollow porous carbon sphere for aerobic alcohol oxidation. Langmuir 2010, 26, 17720–17725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Možina, Š.; Stavber, S.; Iskra, J. Dual catalysis for the aerobic oxidation of benzyl alcohols-nitric acid and fluorinated alcohol. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 3, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sun, J.Y.; Han, Y.X.; Fu, H.Y.; Qu, X.L.; Xu, Z.Y.; Zheng, S.R. Au@Pd/TiO2 with atomically dispersed Pd as highly active catalyst for solvent-free aerobic oxidation of benzyl alcohol. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 313, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tian, J.; Li, J.; Wei, N.; Xu, X.; Cui, H.; Liu, H. Ru nanoparticles decorated TiO2 nanobelts: A heterostructure towards enhanced photocatalytic activity and gas-phase selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 1611–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meng, Y.Y.; An, Q.D.; Xiao, Z.Y.; Zhai, S.R.; Shi, Z. Pd NPs supported on N-doped carbon layer coated ZrSBA-15 for efficient heterogeneous catalysis reactions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 266, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, J.Y.; Tong, X.L.; Liu, Z.H.; Liao, S.Y.; Zhang, X.L.; Xue, S. Gold-catalyzed selectivity-switchable oxidation of benzyl alcohol in the presence of molecular oxygen. Catal. Commun. 2016, 85, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, L.J.; Yan, J.Q.; Tong, Z.X.; Yu, S.Y.; Tang, J.T.; Ou, B.L.; Yue, L.J.; Tian, L. Nanofiber-like mesoporous alumina supported palladium nanoparticles as a highly active catalyst for base-free oxidation of benzyl alcohol. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 266, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alshammari, H.; Alhumaimess, M.; Alotaibi, M.H.; Alshammari, A.S. Catalytic activity of bimetallic AuPd alloys supported MgO and MnO2 nanostructures and their role in selective aerobic oxidation of alcohols. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2017, 29, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, L.L.; Zhou, X.J.; Yan, Y.M.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, W.P.; Tai, X.S. Bimetallic Gold-Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 as Highly Active Heterogenous Catalysts for Selective Oxidation of Benzyl Alcohol into Benzaldehyde. Polymers 2018, 10, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, L.L.; Tai, X.S.; Zhou, X.J.; Hou, J.X.; Zhang, Z.H. Bimetallic AueNi alloy nanoparticles in a metaleorganic framework (MIL-101) as efficient heterogeneous catalysts for selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol into benzaldehyde. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 790, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cruz, P.; Pérez, Y.; Hierro, I.D.; Fajardo, M. Copper, copper oxide nanoparticles and copper complexes supported on mesoporous SBA-15 as catalysts in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol in aqueous phase. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 220, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fu, X.; Wu, S.; Li, Z.; Yang, X.; Wang, X.; Peng, L.; Hu, J.; Huo, Q.; Guan, J.; Kan, Q. Highly efficient Ni–Co oxide nanoparticles on nitrogen-doped FDU-15 for aerobic benzyl alcohol oxidation. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 57507–57513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kimi, M.; Jaidie, M.M.H.; Pang, S.C. Bimetallic Cu–Ni nanoparticles supported on activated carbon for catalytic oxidation of benzyl alcohol. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2018, 112, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, G.J.; Wang, J.S.; Jin, F.Z.; Liu, M.Y.; Zhao, C.W.; Li, Y.A.; Dong, Y.B. Pd@Cu(II)-MOF-catalyzed aerobic oxidation of benzylic alcohols in air with high conversion and selectivity. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 3058–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, A.; Gautam, R.K.; Belwal, M. Synthesis and characterization of Au/γ-Al2O3 nanocatalysts for vapor-phase selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol under aerobic condition. Curr. Catal. 2018, 7, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tareq, S.S.; Saiman, M.I.; Hin, T.Y.Y.; Abdullah, A.H.; Rashid, U. The impact of hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant for solvent-free liquid phase oxidation of benzyl alcohol using Au-Pd supported carbon and titanium catalysts. Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal. 2018, 13, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cordoba, M.; Miranda, C.; Lederhos, C.; Coloma-Pascual, F.; Ardila, A.; Fuentes, G.A.; Pouilloux, Y.; Ramírez, A. Catalytic performance of Co3O4 on different activated carbon supports in the benzyl alcohol oxidation. Catalysts 2017, 7, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, L.L.; Tai, X.S.; Zhou, X.J. Au3+/Au0 supported on chromium(III) terephthalate metal organic framework (MIL-101) as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for three-component coupling synthesis of propargylamines. Materials 2017, 10, 89. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gil, S.; Garcia-Vargas, J.M.; Liotta, L.F.; Pantaleo, G.; Ousmane, M.; Retailleau, L.; Giroir-Fendler, A. Catalytic oxidation of propene over Pd catalysts supported on CeO2, TiO2, Al2O3 and M/Al2O3 oxides (M = Ce, Ti, Fe, Mn). Catalysts 2015, 5, 671–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Watanabe, M.; Aizawa, Y.; Iida, T.; Nishimura, R.; Inomata, H. Catalytic glucose and fructose conversions with TiO2 and ZrO2 in water at 473 K: Relationship between reactivity and acid–base property determined by TPD measurement. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2005, 295, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, L.; Tai, X.; Liu, J.; Li, D.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, L.; Wei, X. Preparation of propargylamines catalyzed by heterogeneous catalysts with double catalytic sites. Chem. J. Chin. Univ.-Chin. 2018, 39, 482–490. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun, Y.; Zhang, G.; Liu, J.; Zhao, P.; Hou, P.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, R. Effect of different activated carbon support on CH4–CO2 reforming over Co-based catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 1497–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Harisekhar, M.; Pavan Kumar, V.; Shanthi Priya, S.; Chary, K.V.R. Vapour phase hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propanediols over Cu/SBA-15 catalysts. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, 1906–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, M. MOF-74 as an efficient catalyst for the low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 26817–26826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qiu, J.H.; Zhang, X.G.; Xie, K.L.; Zhang, X.F.; Feng, Y.; Jia, M.M.; Yao, J.F. Noble metal nanoparticle-functionalized Zr-metal organic frameworks with excellent photocatalytic performance. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 538, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, D.; Yang, D.; Dougherty, C.A.; Lu, W.; Wu, H.; He, X.; Cai, T.; Van Dort, M.E.; Ross, B.D.; Hong, H. In vivo targeting and positron emission tomography imaging of tumor with intrinsically radioactive metal-organic frameworks nanomaterials. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4315–4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Akel, S.; Dillert, R.; Balayeva, N.O.; Boughaled, R.; Koch, J.; Azzouzi, M.E.; Bahnemann, D.W. Ag/Ag2O as a Co-catalyst in TiO2 photocatalysis: Effect of the Co-catalyst/photocatalyst mass ratio. Catalysts 2018, 8, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salmasi, M.; Fatemi, S.; Mortazavi, Y. Fabrication of promoted TiO2 nanotubes with superior catalytic activity against TiO2 nanoparticles as the catalyst of oxi-desulfurization process. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 39, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhong, J.; Wang, G.; Wang, R. Enhanced formic acid electro-oxidation reaction on ternary Pd-Ir-Cu/C catalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 357, 994–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kang, W.D.; Wei, Y.C.; Liu, C.W.; Wang, K.W. Enhancement of electrochemical properties on Pd–Cu/C electrocatalysts toward ethanol oxidation by atmosphere induced surface and structural alteration. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nam, K.M.; Park, H.K.; Lee, C. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of carbon nanofibers and SiO2/carbon nanofiber composite on Ni–Cu/C-fiber textiles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 8989–8995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Karaca, H.; Safonova, O.V.; Chambrey, S.; Fongarland, P.; Roussel, P.; Constant, A.G.; Lacroix, M.; Khodakov, A.Y. Structure and catalytic performance of Pt-promoted alumina-supported cobalt catalysts under realistic conditions of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. J. Catal. 2011, 277, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pieta, I.S.; Rathi, A.; Pieta, P.; Nowakowski, R.; Hołdynski, M.; Pisarek, M.; Kaminska, A.; Gawande, M.B.; Zboril, R. Electrocatalytic methanol oxidation over Cu, Ni and bimetallic Cu-Ni nanoparticles supported on graphitic carbon nitride. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 244, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Duan, H.; Li, Y.; Lv, X.; Chen, D.; Long, M.; Wen, L. CuO–ZnO anchored on APS modified activated carbon as an enhanced catalyst for methanol synthesis-the role of ZnO. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, B.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, H.; Zhao, X.S. Degradation of organic dyes over fenton-like Cu2O–Cu/C catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 14011–14021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Godoi, F.C.; Rodriguez-Castellon, E.; Guibal, E.; Beppu, M.M. An XPS study of chromate and vanadate sorption mechanism by chitosan membrane containing copper nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 234, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, L.J.; Lou, H.; Chen, M. Selective hydrogenation of furfural to tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol over Ni/CNTs and bimetallic CuNi/CNTs catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 14721–14731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, G.Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, C.J.; Xiong, Q.Z.; Gong, W.B.; Wang, G.Z.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zhan, H.M.; Zhao, H.J. Electrocatalytic oxidation of benzyl alcohol for simultaneously promoting H2 evolution by a Co0.83Ni0.17/activated carbon electro-catalyst. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 6381–6388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, M.; Fan, G.; Yu, J.; Yang, L.; Li, F. Defect-rich Ni–Ti layered double hydroxide as a highly efficient support for Au nanoparticles in base-free and solvent-free selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 5226–5235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cui, W.; Xiao, Q.; Sarina, S.; Ao, W.; Xie, M.; Zhu, H.; Bao, Z. Au–Pd alloy nanoparticle catalyzed selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol and tandem synthesis of imines at ambient conditions. Catal. Today 2014, 235, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gao, F.; Goodman, D.W. Pd-Au bimetallic catalysts: Understanding alloy effects from planar models and (supported) nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 8009–8020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, L.L.; Tai, X.S.; Zhang, N.N.; Meng, Q.G.; Xin, C.L. Supported Au/MIL-53(Al): A reusable green solid catalyst for the three-component coupling reaction of aldehyde, alkyne, and amine. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2016, 119, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 09 00538 g001 550
Figure 1. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of the samples measured at 77 K: (a) The nitrogen–adsorption of MIL-101 and CuNi/MIL-101; (b) The nitrogen–adsorption of TiO2, CuNi/TiO2, C, and CuNi/C.
Figure 1. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of the samples measured at 77 K: (a) The nitrogen–adsorption of MIL-101 and CuNi/MIL-101; (b) The nitrogen–adsorption of TiO2, CuNi/TiO2, C, and CuNi/C.
Catalysts 09 00538 g001
Catalysts 09 00538 g002 550
Figure 2. The NH3-TPD curves of MIL-101 (a); TiO2 (b); and C (c).
Figure 2. The NH3-TPD curves of MIL-101 (a); TiO2 (b); and C (c).
Catalysts 09 00538 g002
Catalysts 09 00538 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of MIL-101 (A) and CuNi/MIL-101 (B); (b) XRD patterns of TiO2 (C) and CuNi/TiO2 (D); (c) XRD patterns of C (E) and CuNi/C (F).
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of MIL-101 (A) and CuNi/MIL-101 (B); (b) XRD patterns of TiO2 (C) and CuNi/TiO2 (D); (c) XRD patterns of C (E) and CuNi/C (F).
Catalysts 09 00538 g003
Catalysts 09 00538 g004 550
Figure 4. XPS spectra of CuNi/MIL-101 (a,b), CuNi/TiO2 (c,d), and CuNi/C (e,f).
Figure 4. XPS spectra of CuNi/MIL-101 (a,b), CuNi/TiO2 (c,d), and CuNi/C (e,f).
Catalysts 09 00538 g004
Catalysts 09 00538 g005 550
Figure 5. TEM images (a–c) and EDS line-scanning profile analysis of typical nanoparticles indicated by the white line in (c) for CuNi/MIL-101 (d).
Figure 5. TEM images (a–c) and EDS line-scanning profile analysis of typical nanoparticles indicated by the white line in (c) for CuNi/MIL-101 (d).
Catalysts 09 00538 g005
Catalysts 09 00538 g006 550
Figure 6. TEM images of CuNi/TiO2 (a) and CuNi/C (b).
Figure 6. TEM images of CuNi/TiO2 (a) and CuNi/C (b).
Catalysts 09 00538 g006
Catalysts 09 00538 g007 550
Figure 7. The oxidation of benzyl alcohol with the reaction time of the catalysts: (a) CuNi/TiO2; (b) CuNi/MIL-101; (c) CuNi/C (reaction condition: benzyl alcohol (0.2 mmol), THF (1.5 mL), catalyst (40 mg), 100 °C, 5 bar).
Figure 7. The oxidation of benzyl alcohol with the reaction time of the catalysts: (a) CuNi/TiO2; (b) CuNi/MIL-101; (c) CuNi/C (reaction condition: benzyl alcohol (0.2 mmol), THF (1.5 mL), catalyst (40 mg), 100 °C, 5 bar).
Catalysts 09 00538 g007
Catalysts 09 00538 g008a 550Catalysts 09 00538 g008b 550
Figure 8. Recycling results of CuNi/MIL-101 (a), CuNi/TiO2 (b), and CuNi/C (c) catalysts in the oxidation reaction of benzyl alcohol (reaction condition: 0.2 mmol of benzyl alcohol, 1.5 mL of THF, 0.04 g of catalyst, 100 °C, 5 bar, 4 h).
Figure 8. Recycling results of CuNi/MIL-101 (a), CuNi/TiO2 (b), and CuNi/C (c) catalysts in the oxidation reaction of benzyl alcohol (reaction condition: 0.2 mmol of benzyl alcohol, 1.5 mL of THF, 0.04 g of catalyst, 100 °C, 5 bar, 4 h).
Catalysts 09 00538 g008aCatalysts 09 00538 g008b
Catalysts 09 00538 g009a 550Catalysts 09 00538 g009b 550
Figure 9. (a) XRD patterns of fresh (A) and recycled (B) CuNi/MIL-101; (b) XRD patterns of fresh (C) and recycled (D) CuNi/TiO2; (c) XRD patterns of fresh (E) and recycled (F) CuNi/MIL-101.
Figure 9. (a) XRD patterns of fresh (A) and recycled (B) CuNi/MIL-101; (b) XRD patterns of fresh (C) and recycled (D) CuNi/TiO2; (c) XRD patterns of fresh (E) and recycled (F) CuNi/MIL-101.
Catalysts 09 00538 g009aCatalysts 09 00538 g009b
Catalysts 09 00538 g010 550
Figure 10. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of the samples measured at 77 K: (a) recycled CuNi/MIL-101; (b) CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C.
Figure 10. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of the samples measured at 77 K: (a) recycled CuNi/MIL-101; (b) CuNi/TiO2 and CuNi/C.
Catalysts 09 00538 g010
Table
Table 1. The physicochemical properties of supports and the as-prepared Cu-Ni-supported catalysts.
Table 1. The physicochemical properties of supports and the as-prepared Cu-Ni-supported catalysts.
EntrySamplesBET Surface Area (m2/g)Pore Volume (cm3/g)Pore Diameter (nm)
1MIL-1011186.00.492.8
2CuNi/MIL-1011119.20.452.5
3TiO215.20.0144.3
4CuNi/TiO28.50.00784.7
5C94.90.114.6
6CuNi/C55.60.0795.2
Table
Table 2. The catalytic activity of the catalyst in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde 1.
Table 2. The catalytic activity of the catalyst in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde 1.
EntryCatalystSolventT (°C)Pressure (bar)Con. (%) 2Sel. (%) 2Yield (%)
1MIL-101THF100525.894.224.3
2TiO2THF100513.683.311.3
3CTHF100512.998.012.6
4CuNi/TiO2dioxane10054.698.44.5
5CuNi/TiO2DMF10052.998.12.8
6CuNi/TiO2acetonitrile10053.798.33.6
7CuNi/TiO2THF100554.959.532.7
8CuNi/TiO2THF8055.099.05.0
9CuNi/TiO2THF120586.215.313.2
10CuNi/TiO2THF100142.873.731.5
11CuNi/TiO2THF100347.563.930.4
12CuNi/TiO2THF100778.120.916.3
13CuNi/MIL-101dioxane100324.695.023.4
14CuNi/MIL-101DMF10032.099.02.0
15CuNi/MIL-101acetonitrile100310.198.29.9
16CuNi/MIL-101THF100355.484.847.0
17CuNi/MIL-101THF80342.098.041.2
18CuNi/MIL-101THF120369.364.844.9
19CuNi/MIL-101THF100134.199.033.8
20CuNi/MIL-101THF100562.866.141.5
21CuNi/MIL-101THF100768.643.733.4
22CuNi/Cdioxane100530.994.329.1
23CuNi/CDMF10056.897.46.6
24CuNi/Cacetonitrile100528.495.327.1
25CuNi/CTHF100564.354.134.8
26CuNi/CTHF80334.588.430.5
27CuNi/CTHF100357.668.539.5
28CuNi/CTHF120363.545.228.7
29CuNi/CTHF100127.498.026.9
30CuNi/CTHF100764.443.528.0
1 Reaction conditions: benzyl alcohol (0.2 mmol), solvent (1.5 mL), catalyst (40 mg), 4 h. 2 Determined by GC.
Table
Table 3. Catalytic activities of CuNi/MIL-101 for the oxidation of various alcohols 1.
Table 3. Catalytic activities of CuNi/MIL-101 for the oxidation of various alcohols 1.
EntrySubstratesProductsConv. (%)S (%)
1Catalysts 09 00538 i001Catalysts 09 00538 i00273.824.4
2Catalysts 09 00538 i003Catalysts 09 00538 i00487.928.3
3Catalysts 09 00538 i005Catalysts 09 00538 i00687.325.2
4Catalysts 09 00538 i007Catalysts 09 00538 i00874.926.2
1 Reaction conditions: alcohol (0.2 mmol), THF (1.5 mL), CuNi/MIL-101 (0.04 g), 100 °C, 5 bar, 4 h.
Table
Table 4. The catalytic activity of Cu–Ni-supported catalysts in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde 1.
Table 4. The catalytic activity of Cu–Ni-supported catalysts in the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde 1.
EntryCatalystwCu (%)wNi (%)Cu:Ni Mole RatioConv. (%)S (%)Yield (%)
1Cu(3)Ni/MIL-1014.451.433:177.643.333.6
2Cu(2)Ni/MIL-1013.961.872:165.465.142.6
3CuNi/MIL-1013.152.801:155.484.847.0
4CuNi(2)/MIL-1012.203.771:272.649.636.0
5CuNi(3)/MIL-1011.624.401:378.238.830.3
1 Reaction conditions: benzyl alcohol (0.2 mmol), THF (1.5 mL), catalyst (0.04 g), 100 °C, 3 bar, 4 h.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, L.; Zhou, X.; Liu, L.; Jiang, S.; Li, Y.; Guo, L.; Yan, S.; Tai, X. Heterogeneous Bimetallic Cu–Ni Nanoparticle-Supported Catalysts in the Selective Oxidation of Benzyl Alcohol to Benzaldehyde. Catalysts 2019, 9, 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060538

AMA Style

Liu L, Zhou X, Liu L, Jiang S, Li Y, Guo L, Yan S, Tai X. Heterogeneous Bimetallic Cu–Ni Nanoparticle-Supported Catalysts in the Selective Oxidation of Benzyl Alcohol to Benzaldehyde. Catalysts. 2019; 9(6):538. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Lili, Xiaojing Zhou, Li Liu, Shuai Jiang, Yingjie Li, Luxia Guo, Shijuan Yan, and Xishi Tai. 2019. "Heterogeneous Bimetallic Cu–Ni Nanoparticle-Supported Catalysts in the Selective Oxidation of Benzyl Alcohol to Benzaldehyde" Catalysts 9, no. 6: 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop