1. Introduction
Hydroformylation allows atom-efficient and direct formation of aldehydes from olefins and synthesis gas, and has become a powerful synthetic route for the preparation of some key organic intermediates [
1]. Recently, hydroformylation of functionalized olefins has received considerable attention [
2], especially in the aspect of some special olefins, cycloolefins [
3], vinyl acetate [
4,
5,
6], dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) [
7,
8] and 1,3-Butadiene [
9]. Because their aldehyde products, especially linear products, can be used to prepare of a variety of biologically active compounds and fine chemicals, such as chiral alcohols, acids, amines, diols, and amino alcohols [
10,
11]. At present, hydroformylation is the largest application of homogeneous catalysis on an industrial scale with a capacity of more than 10 million tons per year, and is almost exclusively targeted to the production of the linear aldehydes [
12]. However, for hydroformylation of vinyl acetate, the selectivity of linear aldehyde (3-acetoxy propanal) is mostly less than 5% among the existing reports [
4,
5,
6].
Owing to lower reaction temperature and pressure, nano-Rh-based catalysts have been widely used in hydroformylation reactions [
13,
14]. In particular, supported Rh catalysts have emerged as very active catalysts for hydroformylation of olefins [
15,
16]. It is generally known that several factors can limit the development of gas phase ethanol oxidation with supported Rh catalysts. In particular, the reaction generally requires a high temperature, which tends to cause sintering of the Rh nanoparticles and hence low selectivity. For some oxide-supported Rh catalysts TNTs [
17,
18], ZrO
2 [
19], ZnO [
20], MgO [
21], mesoporous MCM-41 and SBA-15 [
22], molecular sieve [
23], porous organic polymers [
24], Rh nanoparticles are prone to sintering caused by Ostwald ripening, coalescence, or particle migration due to the weak metal-support interactions. Therefore, it is welcome to improve the thermal stability of Rh nanoparticles on supports. We have recently reported that Rh/TiO
2 showed low temperature vinyl acetate conversion (~100%) at ~100 °C, but relatively low acetaldehyde selectivity (~0%) [
25]. Therefore, identifying a robust catalyst with a unique combination of excellent catalytic activity, selectivity, and good resistance to sintering is highly desirable from both an academic and industrial standpoint.
Magnesium silicate nanotubes (MgSNTs) have high specific surface area (SSA) and one-dimensional tubular structure, strong adsorption capacity, larger pore size and outstanding thermal stability. Therefore, MgSNTs are suitable as carriers of catalysts. They can effectively disperse and immobilize metal active components, improve catalytic activity and stability, and overcome the disadvantages of hard separation catalysts and production in homogeneous catalytic systems. Chen [
26] repeated MgSNTs supported Au catalyst to catalyze selective oxidation of ethanol to acetaldehyde, and obtained good results. Not long ago, we reported nanotubular MgSNTs-supported amorphous Co–B catalysts and their catalytic performances for Hydroformylation of cyclohexene [
27], which proved that MgSNTs are indeed good supporters for hydroformylation.
In this study, we report the design and synthesis of Rh-catalysts supported on MgSNTs via the calcination method under N
2, which has been reported rarely by literatures. The Rh/MgSNTs exhibited a considerable impact on the hydroformylation of vinyl acetate and provided excellent regioselectivity (9%) to linear aldehyde (3-acetoxy propanal), which is much higher than recent reports [
4,
28] and this should be due to the confinement effect of nanotubes. Moreover, the catalyst exhibits good recyclability.
2. Materials and Methods
All chemicals were purchased commercially and used without further purification. Magnesium nitrate (Mg(NO3)2·6H2O, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), sodium silicate (Na2SiO3·5H2O, Perimed, Beijing, China), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, Tianjin Chemical Reagent Supply and Distribution Ltd., ≥96.0%, Tianjin, China), ethanol absolute (CH3CH2OH, Tianjin Chemical Reagent Supply and Distribution Ltd., ≥99.7, Tianjin, China), RhCl3·nH2O (ShanxiKaida Chemical Engineering Co. Ltd. and purity ≥39.6%, Shanxi, China). The gases N2, CO and H2 used in the experiments were all of 99.99% purity. Deionized water was used in the experiments.
2.1. Preparation of MgSNTs Supported Rh-nanoparticle Catalysts
The synthesis of magnesium silicate nanotubes (MgSNTs) was developed from the literature [
26]. The specific steps are shown in
Scheme 1: 1.5 g of magnesium nitrate was dissolved in ethanol-water solution, and 10 mL sodium silicate solution (0.5 M) was added drop by drop under stirring conditions, then 2 g sodium hydroxide solid was added, stirring for 24 h. The above reaction solution was transferred to a 100 mL Teflon™ (Heze Development Zone Shengao Experimental Instrument Co., Ltd., Shandong, China) thermo reaction kettle, and the muffle furnace was heated at 200 °C for 48 h. After being centrifuged, washed and dried, the MgSNTs were obtained. MgSNTs-300 was obtained by calcining MgSNTs at 300 °C in a muffle furnace for 2 h.
The Rh/MgSNTs-300 was prepared via high temperature reduction under N
2 atmosphere. The synthesis of Rh/MgSNTs-300 was performed as follows: 1.0 g MgSNTs-300 was dispersed in 20 mL of aqueous RhCl
3 solutions (0.35 wt%, 0.5 wt%, 1.0 wt%) and vigorously agitated for 1 h. After low-energy sonication for 1h, the mixture was centrifuged and dried at 80 °C for 4 h. Then the obtained material was transferred to a tube furnace for calcination at 300 °C for 2 h under N
2. The formation of Rh
0 in the heating procedure can be illustrated as equation (1). According to earlier data, bulk rhodium chloride decomposes to turn into Rh
0 at 300 °C, and the lower decomposition temperature of supported rhodium chloride may be due to its small particle size [
29]. The products were marked as Rh/MgSNTs-300(a
1), Rh/MgSNTs-300(a
2), Rh/MgSNTs-300(a
3). The Rh/MgSNTs-300(b
1), Rh/MgSNTs-300(b
2), Rh/MgSNTs-300(b
3) was obtained by keeping rhodium content as 0.5 wt%, changing the calcination temperature to 200 °C, 400 °C and 500 °C.
2.2. Evaluation of Catalytic Performance of Catalysts for Hydroformylation
The catalytic activities of the catalysts for hydroformylation of vinyl acetate were measured. In a typical experiment, 0.4 g of catalyst and the required amount of substrate and solvent were placed in a 250 mL stainless steel autoclave reactor. The reactor was placed in a temperature-controlled electrical furnace and then purged with H2 three times. The reactant mixture composed of CO, H2 (CO/H2 = 1:1) = 6.0 MPa was fed to the reactor. After this, one heated the reaction temperature to the desired pressure while stirring. When the reaction was over, the stirring was stopped.
The reactor was then cooled to room temperature and the pressure was released gradually. The product was analyzed by GC7890B-5977A MS (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or GC (GC-2014 gas chromatograph equipped with a 30 m × 0.53 mm SE-30 capillary column and a FID, Shimadzu, Japan). Recycling uses of catalysts were carried out here simply by separating the used catalyst from the mother solution of the first reaction via centrifugation and directly used for the next run under fixed conditions.
2.3. Characterization
The crystal phase and structure of catalysts were detected by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Rigaku D/Max-2500, (Rigaku, Japan), which was performed with Cu–Ka radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) at 2θ from 10° to 80°. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were recorded using a Tecnai G2 F20 instrument (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS, Kratos Axis Ultra DLD multi-technique X-ray photoelectron spectra, Kratos Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK) was used to test the chemical states of Rh in catalysts, and all binding energies were calibrated using C1s (Eb = 284.6 eV) for the reference. What needs to be noted in particular is that the XPS test was using a double anode magnesium target. The content of Rh was determined by ICP-AES (ICP-9000, USA Thermo Jarrell-Ash Corp, Franklin, MA, USA). N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms were collected on an Autosorb-1-MP 1530VP (Quantachrome, Florida, FL, USA) automatic surface area and porosity analyzer. The sample was degassed at 473 K for 5 h and then analyzed at 77 K. The relative pressure (P/P0) range used for the calculation of the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area was from 0.05 to 0.30.