Hydrogen Production from Steam Reforming of Acetic Acid as a Model Compound of the Aqueous Fraction of Microalgae HTL Using Co-M/SBA-15 (M: Cu, Ag, Ce, Cr) Catalysts
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Catalysts Characterization
2.2. Catalytic Tests
3. Experimental Section
3.1. Catalysts Synthesis
3.2. Catalysts Characterization
3.3. Catalytic Tests
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dobosz, J.; Małecka, M.; Zawadzki, M. Hydrogen generation via ethanol steam reforming over Co/HAp catalysts. J. Energy Inst. 2018, 91, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vizcaíno, A.J.; Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A. Hydrogen Production from Bioethanol; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Agency, I.E. Hydrogen Production and Storage: R&D Priorities and Gaps; IEA Publications: Paris, France, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Ruocco, C.; Palma, V.; Ricca, A. Kinetics of Oxidative Steam Reforming of Ethanol Over Bimetallic Catalysts Supported on CeO2–SiO2: A Comparative Study. Top. Catal. 2019, 62, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, L.; Parra, J.M.S.; Blekkan, E.A.; Chen, D. Towards efficient hydrogen production from glycerol by sorption enhanced steam reforming. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1046–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Chen, M.; Tang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Hu, J.; Zhang, H. Hydrogen production from steam reforming ethanol over Ni/attapulgite catalysts - Part I: Effect of nickel content. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 192, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrero, A.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; Calles, J.A.; García-Moreno, L. Hydrogen production through glycerol steam reforming using Co catalysts supported on SBA-15 doped with Zr, Ce and La. J. Energy Chem. 2017, 26, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shayan, E.; Zare, V.; Mirzaee, I. Hydrogen production from biomass gasification; a theoretical comparison of using different gasification agents. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 159, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, J.; Sverdrup, G.; Mann, M.K.; Maness, P.C.; Kroposki, B.; Ghirardi, M.; Blake, D. Renewable hydrogen production. Int. J. Energy Res. 2008, 32, 379–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, J.-L.; Zhu, Y.-H.; Zhu, M.-Q.; Kang, K.; Sun, R.-C. A review of gasification of bio-oil for gas production. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2019, 3, 1600–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López Barreiro, D.; Prins, W.; Ronsse, F.; Brilman, W. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of microalgae for biofuel production: State of the art review and future prospects. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 53, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.-H.; Lin, B.-J.; Huang, M.-Y.; Chang, J.-S. Thermochemical conversion of microalgal biomass into biofuels: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 184, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiaramonti, D.; Prussi, M.; Buffi, M.; Rizzo, A.M.; Pari, L. Review and experimental study on pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae for biofuel production. Appl. Energy 2017, 185, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Yeh, T.; Song, W.; Xu, D.; Wang, S. A review of bio-oil production from hydrothermal liquefaction of algae. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 48, 776–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, K.; Maheria, K.C.; Kumar Dalai, A. Bio-oil valorization: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 23, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Remón, J.; Broust, F.; Volle, G.; García, L.; Arauzo, J. Hydrogen production from pine and poplar bio-oils by catalytic steam reforming. Influence of the bio-oil composition on the process. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 5593–5608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Fu, H.; Chen, J. Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Macroalgae Enteromorpha prolifera to Bio-oil. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 4054–4061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Jia, L.; Chen, C.; Liu, G.; Fang, W. Bio-oil from hydro-liquefaction of Dunaliella salina over Ni/REHY catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 4580–4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jena, U.; Das, K.C. Comparative Evaluation of Thermochemical Liquefaction and Pyrolysis for Bio-Oil Production from Microalgae. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 5472–5482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maddi, B.; Panisko, E.; Wietsma, T.; Lemmon, T.; Swita, M.; Albrecht, K.; Howe, D. Quantitative characterization of the aqueous fraction from hydrothermal liquefaction of algae. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 93, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, J.M.; Soria, M.A.; Madeira, L.M. Challenges and strategies for optimization of glycerol steam reforming process. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 1187–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Lu, G. Comparative study of alumina-supported transition metal catalysts for hydrogen generation by steam reforming of acetic acid. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 99, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banach, B.; Machocki, A.; Rybak, P.; Denis, A.; Grzegorczyk, W.; Gac, W. Selective production of hydrogen by steam reforming of bio-ethanol. Catal. Today 2011, 176, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishihara, A.; Andou, A.; Hashimoto, T.; Nasu, H. Steam reforming of ethanol using novel carbon-oxide composite-supported Ni, Co and Fe catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 2020, 197, 106203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khodakov, A.Y.; Chu, W.; Fongarland, P. Advances in the Development of Novel Cobalt Fischer−Tropsch Catalysts for Synthesis of Long-Chain Hydrocarbons and Clean Fuels. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1692–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Llorca, J.; Dalmon, J.-A.; Ramírez de la Piscina, P.; Homs, N.S. In situ magnetic characterisation of supported cobalt catalysts under steam-reforming of ethanol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2003, 243, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsoncheva, T.; Ivanova, L.; Minchev, C.; Fröba, M. Cobalt-modified mesoporous MgO, ZrO2, and CeO2 oxides as catalysts for methanol decomposition. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 333, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calles, J.A.; Carrero, A.; Vizcaíno, A.J. Ce and La modification of mesoporous Cu–Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for hydrogen production through ethanol steam reforming. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 119, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, E.B.; Homs, N.; Martí, S.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Ramírez de la Piscina, P. Oxidative steam-reforming of ethanol over Co/SiO2, Co–Rh/SiO2 and Co–Ru/SiO2 catalysts: Catalytic behavior and deactivation/regeneration processes. J. Catal. 2008, 257, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Tao, J.; Liu, C.; Yan, B.; Li, W.; Li, X. Hydrogen production via acetic acid steam reforming: A critical review on catalysts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 79, 1091–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Chen, M.; Yang, Z.; Liang, T.; Liu, S.; Zhou, Z.; Li, X. Bimetallic Ni-M (M = Co, Cu and Zn) supported on attapulgite as catalysts for hydrogen production from glycerol steam reforming. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2018, 550, 214–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eschemann, T.O.; Oenema, J.; de Jong, K.P. Effects of noble metal promotion for Co/TiO2 Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Catal. Today 2016, 261, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jermwongratanachai, T.; Jacobs, G.; Ma, W.; Shafer, W.D.; Gnanamani, M.K.; Gao, P.; Kitiyanan, B.; Davis, B.H.; Klettlinger, J.L.S.; Yen, C.H.; et al. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: Comparisons between Pt and Ag promoted Co/Al2O3 catalysts for reducibility, local atomic structure, catalytic activity, and oxidation–reduction (OR) cycles. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 464–465, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harun, N.; Abidin, S.Z.; Osazuwa, O.U.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.; Azizan, M.T. Hydrogen production from glycerol dry reforming over Ag-promoted Ni/Al2O3. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konsolakis, M.; Sgourakis, M.; Carabineiro, S.A.C. Surface and redox properties of cobalt–ceria binary oxides: On the effect of Co content and pretreatment conditions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 341, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trimm, D.L. Coke formation and minimisation during steam reforming reactions. Catal. Today 1997, 37, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerdá-Moreno, C.; Da Costa-Serra, J.F.; Chica, A. Co and La supported on Zn-Hydrotalcite-derived material as efficient catalyst for ethanol steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 12685–12692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calles, J.A.; Carrero, A.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; García-Moreno, L.; Megía, P.J. Steam Reforming of Model Bio-Oil Aqueous Fraction Using Ni-(Cu, Co, Cr)/SBA-15 Catalysts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Casanovas, A.; Roig, M.; de Leitenburg, C.; Trovarelli, A.; Llorca, J. Ethanol steam reforming and water gas shift over Co/ZnO catalytic honeycombs doped with Fe, Ni, Cu, Cr and Na. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 7690–7698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casanovas, A.; de Leitenburg, C.; Trovarelli, A.; Llorca, J. Catalytic monoliths for ethanol steam reforming. Catal. Today 2008, 138, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Si, M.; Li, X.; Lv, J. Effects of titanium silicalite and TiO2 nanocomposites on supported Co-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Yang, M.; Dong, W.; Tan, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, P.; Peng, C.; Wang, G. Temperature difference effect induced self-assembly method for Ag/SBA-15 nanostructures and their catalytic properties for epoxidation of styrene. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 215, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A.; García-Moreno, L.; Vizcaíno, A.J. Production of Renewable Hydrogen from Glycerol Steam Reforming over Bimetallic Ni-(Cu,Co,Cr) Catalysts Supported on SBA-15 Silica. Catalysts 2017, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vizcaíno, A.J.; Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A. Hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming over Cu–Ni supported catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2007, 32, 1450–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Sun, L.; Wang, J.; Yan, Y.; Wang, M.; Xu, R. Confination of Ag nanostructures within SBA-15 by a “two solvents” reduction technique. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 57, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, A.; López, C.; Márquez, F.; Díaz, I. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons over mesoporous Co/SBA-15 catalysts: The influence of metal loading, cobalt precursor, and promoters. J. Catal. 2003, 220, 486–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fierro, G.; Lo Jacono, M.; Inversi, M.; Dragone, R.; Porta, P. TPR and XPS study of cobalt–copper mixed oxide catalysts: Evidence of a strong Co–Cu interaction. Top. Catal. 2000, 10, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aspromonte, S.G.; Miró, E.E.; Boix, A.V. FTIR studies of butane, toluene and nitric oxide adsorption on Ag exchanged NaMordenite. Adsorption 2012, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, S.S.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Ha, S.Y. Metallic phases of cobalt-based catalysts in ethanol steam reforming: The effect of cerium oxide. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2009, 355, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, D.; Baek, J.; Choi, Y.; Kim, W.; Jong Lee, H.; Yi, J. Promotional Effect of Ni on a CrOx Catalyst Supported on Silica in the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane with CO2. ChemCatChem 2012, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Zhang, X.; Arandiyan, H.; Peng, Y.; Chang, H.; Li, J. Low temperature complete combustion of methane over cobalt chromium oxides catalysts. Catal. Today 2013, 201, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoican Loebick, C.; Lee, S.; Derrouiche, S.; Schwab, M.; Chen, Y.; Haller, G.L.; Pfefferle, L. A novel synthesis route for bimetallic CoCr–MCM-41 catalysts with higher metal loadings. Their application in the high yield, selective synthesis of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. J. Catal. 2010, 271, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheffe, J.R.; Steinfeld, A. Thermodynamic Analysis of Cerium-Based Oxides for Solar Thermochemical Fuel Production. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 1928–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, N.A.S.; Tan, E.F.; Manan, Z.A. SCR of NOx by C3H6: Comparison between Cu/Cr/CeO2 and Cu/Ag/CeO2 catalysts. J. Catal. 2004, 222, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, W.-H.; Chen, I.; Liou, J.-S.; Lin, S.-S. Supported Cu Catalysts with Yttria-Doped Ceria for Steam Reforming of Methanol. Top. Catal. 2003, 22, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Ma, L.; Wainwright, M.S. The influence of Cr, Zn and Co additives on the performance of skeletal copper catalysts for methanol synthesis and related reactions. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2004, 257, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Xi, J.; Wang, W.; Lu, G. Selective production of hydrogen by partial oxidation of methanol over Cu/Cr catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2003, 191, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.; Duan, L.E.; Tang, M.; Liu, P.; Ma, X.; Zhang, Y.; Harris, H.G.; Fan, M. Catalytic CO2 reforming of CH4 over Cr-promoted Ni/char for H2 production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 10141–10153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, A.L.M.; den Breejen, J.P.; Mattos, L.V.; Bitter, J.H.; de Jong, K.P.; Noronha, F.B. Cobalt particle size effects on catalytic performance for ethanol steam reforming—Smaller is better. J. Catal. 2014, 318, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, H.; Zeng, L.; Tian, H.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Gong, J. Efficient hydrogen production from ethanol steam reforming over La-modified ordered mesoporous Ni-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 181, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Dong, D.; Shao, X.; Zhang, L.; Lu, G. Steam reforming of acetic acid over cobalt catalysts: Effects of Zr, Mg and K addition. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 4793–4803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, P.; Kunzru, D. Steam reforming of ethanol on Ni–CeO2–ZrO2 catalysts: Effect of doping with copper, cobalt and calcium. Catal. Lett. 2007, 118, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thaicharoensutcharittham, S.; Meeyoo, V.; Kitiyanan, B.; Rangsunvigit, P.; Rirksomboon, T. Hydrogen production by steam reforming of acetic acid over Ni-based catalysts. Catal. Today 2011, 164, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Chen, M.; Liang, T.; Yang, Z.; Yang, J.; Liu, S. Hydrogen Generation from Catalytic Steam Reforming of Acetic Acid by Ni/Attapulgite Catalysts. Catalysts 2016, 6, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nogueira, F.G.E.; Assaf, P.G.M.; Carvalho, H.W.P.; Assaf, E.M. Catalytic steam reforming of acetic acid as a model compound of bio-oil. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 160–161, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valle, B.; Aramburu, B.; Benito, P.L.; Bilbao, J.; Gayubo, A.G. Biomass to hydrogen-rich gas via steam reforming of raw bio-oil over Ni/La2O3-αAl2O3 catalyst: Effect of space-time and steam-to-carbon ratio. Fuel 2018, 216, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Yang, X.; Li, Y. Investigation on the structure and the oxidation activity of the solid carbon produced from catalytic decomposition of methane. Fuel 2010, 89, 943–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagasawa, S.; Yudasaka, M.; Hirahara, K.; Ichihashi, T.; Iijima, S. Effect of oxidation on single-wall carbon nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 328, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choong, C.K.S.; Zhong, Z.; Huang, L.; Wang, Z.; Ang, T.P.; Borgna, A.; Lin, J.; Hong, L.; Chen, L. Effect of calcium addition on catalytic ethanol steam reforming of Ni/Al2O3: I. Catalytic stability, electronic properties and coking mechanism. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2011, 407, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galetti, A.E.; Gomez, M.F.; Arrúa, L.A.; Abello, M.C. Hydrogen production by ethanol reforming over NiZnAl catalysts: Influence of Ce addition on carbon deposition. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2008, 348, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natesakhawat, S.; Watson, R.B.; Wang, X.; Ozkan, U.S. Deactivation characteristics of lanthanide-promoted sol–gel Ni/Al2O3 catalysts in propane steam reforming. J. Catal. 2005, 234, 496–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, W.; Chen, S.; Wu, Y.; Xie, K. A chromium oxide coated nickel/yttria stabilized zirconia electrode with a heterojunction interface for use in electrochemical methane reforming. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 47599–47608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia, L.A.; French, R.; Czernik, S.; Chornet, E. Catalytic steam reforming of bio-oils for the production of hydrogen: Effects of catalyst composition. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2000, 201, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helveg, S.; Sehested, J.; Rostrup-Nielsen, J.R. Whisker carbon in perspective. Catal. Today 2011, 178, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natesakhawat, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Ozkan, U.S. Development of chromium-free iron-based catalysts for high-temperature water-gas shift reaction. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2006, 260, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra Gallego, G.; Mondragón, F.; Tatibouët, J.-M.; Barrault, J.; Batiot-Dupeyrat, C. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over La2NiO4 as catalyst precursor—Characterization of carbon deposition. Catal. Today 2008, 133–135, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A.; Vizcaíno, A.J. Effect of Mg and Ca addition on coke deposition over Cu–Ni/SiO2 catalysts for ethanol steam reforming. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 163, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montero, C.; Ochoa, A.; Castaño, P.; Bilbao, J.; Gayubo, A.G. Monitoring Ni0 and coke evolution during the deactivation of a Ni/La2O3–αAl2O3 catalyst in ethanol steam reforming in a fluidized bed. J. Catal. 2015, 331, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osorio-Vargas, P.; Flores-González, N.A.; Navarro, R.M.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Campos, C.H.; Reyes, P. Improved stability of Ni/Al2O3 catalysts by effect of promoters (La2O3, CeO2) for ethanol steam-reforming reaction. Catal. Today 2016, 259, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charisiou, N.D.; Siakavelas, G.; Papageridis, K.N.; Baklavaridis, A.; Tzounis, L.; Polychronopoulou, K.; Goula, M.A. Hydrogen production via the glycerol steam reforming reaction over nickel supported on alumina and lanthana-alumina catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 13039–13060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, K.C.; Corio, P.; Santos, J.J. Characterization of the chemical interaction between single-walled carbon nanotubes and titanium dioxide nanoparticles by thermogravimetric analyses and resonance Raman spectroscopy. Vib. Spectrosc. 2016, 86, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzounis, L.; Kirsten, M.; Simon, F.; Mäder, E.; Stamm, M. The interphase microstructure and electrical properties of glass fibers covalently and non-covalently bonded with multiwall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2014, 73, 310–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferencz, Z.; Varga, E.; Puskás, R.; Kónya, Z.; Baán, K.; Oszkó, A.; Erdőhelyi, A. Reforming of ethanol on Co/Al2O3 catalysts reduced at different temperatures. J. Catal. 2018, 358, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, D.; Feng, J.; Huo, Q.; Melosh, N.; Fredrickson, G.H.; Chmelka, B.F.; Stucky, G.D. Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores. Science 1998, 279, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Vizcaíno, A.J.; Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A. Ethanol steam reforming on Mg- and Ca-modified Cu–Ni/SBA-15 catalysts. Catal. Today 2009, 146, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A.; Vizcaíno, A.J. Hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming over Cu-Ni/SBA-15 supported catalysts prepared by direct synthesis and impregnation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2007, 327, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vizcaíno, A.J.; Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A. Comparison of ethanol steam reforming using Co and Ni catalysts supported on SBA-15 modified by Ca and Mg. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 146, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalyst | Coa (wt.%) | Ma (wt.%) | SBET (m2·g−1) | Dpore b (nm) | Vpore c (cm3·g−1) | DCo0d (nm) | Dispersion (%) e |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBA-15 | - | - | 550 ± 3 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | - | - |
Co/SBA-15 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | - | 503 ± 4 | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 9.5 ± 0.5 | 7.5 ± 0.2 |
Co-Cu/SBA-15 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 476 ± 4 | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 0.79 ± 0.03 | 9.7 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.1 |
Co-Ag/SBA-15 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 419 ± 4 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 12.3 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.6 |
Co-Ce/SBA-15 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 494 ± 1 | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 9.6 ± 0.2 | 6.5 ± 0.1 |
Co-Cr/SBA-15 | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 469 ± 1 | 7.1 ± 0.1 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 9.9 ± 0.3 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Megía, P.J.; Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A.; Vizcaíno, A.J. Hydrogen Production from Steam Reforming of Acetic Acid as a Model Compound of the Aqueous Fraction of Microalgae HTL Using Co-M/SBA-15 (M: Cu, Ag, Ce, Cr) Catalysts. Catalysts 2019, 9, 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9121013
Megía PJ, Carrero A, Calles JA, Vizcaíno AJ. Hydrogen Production from Steam Reforming of Acetic Acid as a Model Compound of the Aqueous Fraction of Microalgae HTL Using Co-M/SBA-15 (M: Cu, Ag, Ce, Cr) Catalysts. Catalysts. 2019; 9(12):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9121013
Chicago/Turabian StyleMegía, Pedro J., Alicia Carrero, José A. Calles, and Arturo J. Vizcaíno. 2019. "Hydrogen Production from Steam Reforming of Acetic Acid as a Model Compound of the Aqueous Fraction of Microalgae HTL Using Co-M/SBA-15 (M: Cu, Ag, Ce, Cr) Catalysts" Catalysts 9, no. 12: 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9121013