Next Article in Journal
Preparation of a Flower-Like Immobilized D-Psicose 3-Epimerase with Enhanced Catalytic Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
Support Effect on the Performance of Ni2P Catalysts in the Hydrodeoxygenation of Methyl Palmitate
Previous Article in Journal
Comparing Photocatalytic Degradation of Gaseous Ethylbenzene Using N-doped and Pure TiO2 Nano-Catalysts Coated on Glass Beads under Both UV and Visible Light Irradiation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magnetic Combined Cross-Linked Enzyme Aggregates of Ketoreductase and Alcohol Dehydrogenase: An Efficient and Stable Biocatalyst for Asymmetric Synthesis of (R)-3-Quinuclidinol with Regeneration of Coenzymes In Situ
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selective Dehydration of Glucose into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural by Ionic Liquid-ZrOCl2 in Isopropanol

1
School of Chemical Engineering, Chongqing Chemical Industry Vocational College, Chongqing 401220, China
2
Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
3
Department of chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830001, China
4
Xinjiang Quality of Products Supervision & Inspection Institute of Technology, Urumqi 830001, China
5
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Transportation System, School of Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2018, 8(10), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8100467
Submission received: 29 August 2018 / Revised: 25 September 2018 / Accepted: 25 September 2018 / Published: 18 October 2018

Abstract

:
In this work, a heterogeneous catalytic system consisting of [HO2CMMIm]Cl and ZrOCl2 in isopropanol is demonstrated to be effective for 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) synthesis with glucose as the feedstock. Various reaction conditions for HMF synthesis by glucose dehydration were investigated systematically. Under optimized reaction conditions, as high as 43 mol% HMF yield could be achieved. Increasing the water content to a level below 3.17% led to the production of HMF with a higher yield, while a lower HMF yield was observed when the water content was increased above 3.17%. In addition, the data also showed that ZrOCl2 could not only effectively convert glucose into intermediate species (which were not fructose, in contrast to the literature) but also catalyze the intermediate species’ in situ dehydration into HMF. [HO2CMMIm]Cl was used to catalyze the intermediate species’ in situ conversion to HMF. The kinetics data showed that a temperature increase accelerated the intermediate species’ dehydration reaction rate. The reaction of glucose dehydration was a strong endothermal reaction.

1. Introduction

Carbohydrates, as a renewable and abundant biomass feedstock, represent a promising carbon source. Therefore, an efficient and economical process that can convert carbohydrates into useful chemicals is highly desirable. Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) with carbohydrates as the feedstock is one of the hot points in the process of material resources’ comprehensive utilization. HMF has been proposed by the US Department of Energy to be one of the top 12 platform chemicals, having the potential to be a building block in the synthesis of furanic-based polyamides, polyesters, and polyurethanes analogous to petroleum-based terephthalic acid [1,2,3,4,5,6].
HMF can be produced from glucose and fructose through acid catalysts [7]. In the past decade, HMF synthesis from fructose has been studied widely, and as high as 90% HMF yields have been readily achieved [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Glucose is the most abundant and cheap C6 sugar, so the syntheses of HMF from glucose is more attractive. A variety of solvents have been investigated for converting glucose into HMF, such as water [23,24], organic solvents (e.g., DMSO) [2], organic/aqueous binary mixtures [25,26,27,28,29], and ionic liquids [17,30,31,32,33,34]. Many more catalyst systems have also been developed for glucose dehydration, such as Lewis acid catalysts [35], tantalum compounds [36], boric acid [37], ionic liquids (ILs) [38], ion exchange resins [39], zeolites [40,41], chromium(0) nanoparticles [42], Sn–Mont catalyst [4], bifunctional SO42−/ZrO2 catalysts [43], mesoporous tantalum phosphate [44], and so on.
Recently, HMF synthesis by sugar dehydration with ionic liquids (ILs) as solvents or using acidic ionic liquids [45,46,47] as catalysts has grown rapidly because of its unique and tunable properties. In fact, a 70% HMF yield with 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([EMIM]Cl) as the reaction solvent can be obtained over a chromium (II) chloride catalyst [17]; a 83.4% HMF yield can be obtained over a chromium (II) chloride catalyst in 1,8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0]undec-7-ene-based ionic liquids [32]; a 48.4% HMF yield was observed over a germanium (IV) chloride catalyst in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([BMIM]Cl) with glucose as the feedstock [34]; a 58.3% HMF yield can be obtained over a tin phosphate catalyst with the ionic liquid EMIMBr as the solvent [48]; a 67.3% HMF yield was reported over a 1-hydroxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ionic liquid catalyst in DMSO [38]. Only a 50.6% HMF yield with glucose as the feedstock was achieved in DMSO over the 1-carboxypropyl-3-methyl imidazoliumchloride ([CMIm]Cl) and ZrOCl2 catalyst system by Hu et al., although a 95.7% HMF yield can be obtained with fructose as the feedstock over a [CMIm]Cl catalyst [16].
It is well known that the isomerization of glucose into fructose is a key step in the synthesis of HMF from glucose (Scheme 1). Recently, it was reported that the isomerization of glucopyranose to fructofuranose could be effectively catalyzed by ZrOCl2 [49]. Hu et al. also reported that the isomerization of glucose into fructose could be obtained with ZrOCl2 as the catalyst [16].
Recovery of ionic liquid is usually done by extraction with diethyl ether (Et2O) [50]. However, diethyl ether is easily volatized, so developing a new method of recovery of the ionic liquid without an organic solvent is highly desirable. In our previous work, [HO2CMMIm]Cl could be recovered by centrifugation. A 91.2% HMF yield for fructose dehydration could be obtained with [HO2CMMIm]Cl as the catalyst in isopropanol [51], but only a 6.7% HMF yield could be obtained for glucose dehydration. Thus, a catalytic system with ZrOCl2 and [HO2CMMIm]Cl was developed in this study to catalyze glucose conversion to HMF.
In this work, a [HO2CMMIm]Cl–ZrOCl2–isopropanol system was reported to catalyze glucose conversion into HMF, as shown in Scheme 2. Interestingly, no fructose was found in the reactions, and more than 90% glucose conversion with less than 3% HMF yield was observed in a few minutes. ZrOCl2 was used not only for glucose conversion but also for production of HMF; [HO2CMMIm]Cl was used for production of HMF. These data suggest that glucose was first converted into intermediate species, but the intermediate species were not fructose; therefore, the possible reaction route was not in agreement with the route reported in the literature [16,52]. Increasing the water content (below 3.17%) led to a higher HMF yield, but only a 4.9% HMF yield was obtained with 60% water content. Furthermore, the catalyst system could be recovered by centrifugation without an organic solvent.

2. Results & Discussion

2.1. Effect of IL [HO2CMMIm]Cl Loading on the Catalytic Performance

In our previously works, a 91.2% HMF yield for fructose dehydration could be obtained with [HO2CMMIm]Cl as the catalyst in isopropanol [51]. Therefore, a reaction of glucose dehydration was carried out, but only a 6.7% HMF yield with 92% glucose conversion was observed. Based on the literature [16], ZrOCl2 was introduced into the catalytic system. A 25% HMF yield with 95.8% glucose conversion was achieved in a 3 h reaction at 150 °C, with 0.15 g ZrOCl2 and 0.1 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl as the catalyst. Therefore, we studied the effect of IL [HO2CMMIm]Cl loading on the catalytic performance, and the results are listed in Figure 1. It can be seen that the selectivity of HMF increased gradually with the increase of the amounts of [HO2CMMIm]Cl; HMF yield first increased with [HO2CMMIm]Cl loading increase, reached a maximum of 29.3% at 50 mg [HO2CMMIm]Cl, then decreased with further increases of [HO2CMMIm]Cl loading. This suggested that [HO2CMMIm]Cl could increase HMF selectivity, and that ZrOCl2 not only was favorable to the conversion of glucose, but also could increase the yield of HMF.

2.2. Effect of ZrOCl2 Loading on the Catalytic Performance

In the above section, ZrOCl2 was not only favoring the conversion of glucose, but also increasing HMF yield. So, the effects of ZrOCl2 loading on the catalytic performance were examined with 50 mg [HO2CMMIm]Cl as the catalyst, and the results are summarized in Figure 2. it can be seen that the yield of HMF increased dramatically with ZrOCl2 loading at the beginning, with up to 30% HMF yield achieved at 200 mg ZrOCl2 loading when the reaction was conducted at 150 °C. While the yield of HMF decreased as ZrOCl2 loading increased to 250 mg, the selectivity of HMF first increased, then decreased.

2.3. Influence of the Reaction Time on the Catalytic Performance

The influence of the reaction time on glucose conversion, HMF yield, and selectivity was also investigated, and the data are summarized in Figure 3. It can be seen that the conversion of glucose increased sharply to 93% in the first 5 min, then increased gradually from 93% to 98% in the following 3 h, while the yield of HMF was only 1% in the first 5 min and then gradually increased to 29.3% in the following 3 h; HMF selectivity gradually decreased from 90% to 66% in 3 h. These data suggested that glucose could be converted into intermediate species within a short time. The intermediate species were not fructose according to the results from HPLC, and a longer reaction time was necessary for HMF production from the intermediate species by the [HO2CMMIm]Cl–ZrOCl2–isopropanol system.

2.4. Effect of the Reaction Temperature on the Catalytic Performance

The effect of the reaction temperature on glucose dehydration in isopropanol over the [HO2CMMIm]Cl–ZrOCl2 catalyst system (reaction time of 3 h) was also examined, and the data are listed in Figure 4. The conversion of glucose gradually increased from 80% to 95.8% when increasing the temperature from 120 °C to 160 °C, while the yield of HMF increased to 29.3% from 6.7% with a reaction temperature increase from 120 °C to 150 °C and remained unchanged as the reaction temperature further increased to 160 °C. The change in the selectivity of HMF was very limited, ranging from 68% to 66% under the studied reaction temperature.

2.5. Effect of Substrate Loading on HMF synthesis

The effect of the glucose loading on glucose dehydration was also examined under the conditions of 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 150 °C reaction temperature, and 3 h reaction time, and the data are listed in Figure 5. HMF yield decreased from 43% to 27% with the increase of glucose loading from 30 mg to 120 mg. This could arise from increased glucose concentration in isopropanol, which likely favored side reactions such as polymerization and rehydration, producing humins as the main by-product. The selectivity of HMF showed a similar trend. The conversion of glucose decreased gradually.

2.6. Effect of Water Content on the Catalytic Performance

Figure 6 shows the influence of water on glucose dehydration in isopropanol at 150 °C. In isopropanol, glucose was firstly converted into the intermediate species, and the intermediate species were subsequently converted to HMF. A 29.3% HMF yield was achieved after a 3 h reaction. The conversion of the intermediate species to HMF was dramatically enhanced by the addition of 3.17 wt % water. The yield of HMF increased to 35.2% with the addition of 3.17 wt % water to the isopropanol. The intermediate species convertion to HMF was inhibited in the presence of more than 10 wt % water. Only a 4.9% HMF yield was observed in the presence of 60 wt % water. These data suggested that the catalytic reaction could be accelerated, and the concentration of the catalytic active species could be decreased by increasing the water content to a certain range.

2.7. Kinetics Studies

We considered that, in our work, glucose dehydration consisted of two processes, the first of which was glucose convertion into the intermediate species, and the second was the intermediate species convertion into HMF, which could be assumed to be the rate-determining step. As shown elsewhere, in this case, the overall rate can be written in terms of a product of equilibrium constants for the steps that are not rate-determining, multiplied by the equilibrium constant for the formation of the transition state for the rate-determining step [53,54]. Accordingly, the overall rate can be expressed in terms of a single equilibrium constant (k, which is a product of the individual equilibrium constants, for example, for HMF) for the formation of the rate-determining transition state from the reactant R [55].
Therefore, in our work, the kinetics of glucose dehydration was analyzed according to the HMF yield. The first few intermediate species (IS) [IS]t data points were used to construct liner ln([IS]t/[IS]0) versus t plots (Equation (1)), and the first-order rate constants, k, were obtained from the slope (the glucose dehydration reaction was established to occur as follows: glucose was first converted into fructose, then fructose was converted into HMF; the rate constant of fructose conversion to HMF was described as first-order in the literature; therefore, a first-order rate constant was assumed for glucose dehydration in this work):
ln [ IS ] t [ IS ] 0 = kt
where [IS]t = IS concentration at time t, [IS]0 = initial IS concentration, k = observed rate constant, and t = time in minutes.
As summarized in Table 1, the value of k increased with the reaction temperature increase, indicating that the dehydration reaction of the intermediate species would be accelerated by a higher reaction temperature:
lnk = E RT + lnA
where k is the observed rate constant, E is the activation energy, T is the temperature in kelvin, R is the ideal gas constant, A is the pre-exponential factor.
An Arrhenius plot was obtained, as shown in Figure 7. Based on these data, the kinetic parameters for [HO2CMMIm]Cl–ZrOCl2-catalyzed glucose dehydration could be calculated. An apparent activation energy of 48.01 KJ/mol was calculated.
Jack M. Carraher [56] reported that ΔH = Ea − RT. On the basis of this equation, ΔH at different temperatures could be obtained, and the results are listed in Table 2. Obviously, all values of ΔH were higher than 47 kJ mol−1, suggesting that the reaction of glucose dehydration was a strong endothermal reaction, and thus a high reaction temperature was favorable to obtaining the intermediate species conversion.

2.8. Recycling of the Catalysts

Tests were carried out for the recycling of the catalyst, and the results are summarized in Table 3. It can be seen that there was only a slight decrease of the catalytic performance of the catalyst, suggesting that the catalyst could be recycled and reused. A possible reason for the decreased yield of HMF may be that a certain amount of catalyst was not recycled by centrifugation.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

The IL [HO2CMMIm]Cl) was supplied by Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. All the other materials, such as glucose, fructose, ZrOCl2, isopropanol, were analytic-grade, purchased from Alfa Aesar and used as received without further purification.

3.2. Reaction Testing

Glucose dehydration was carried out in a 10 mL thick-walled glass reactor made by Alltech. An oil bath with an Isotemp digital stirring hot plate was used to heat the reactor rapidly to the desired reaction temperature. In addition, a triangular stir bar was placed in the bottle of the reactor before adding the reactants, so as to give an adequate agitation. A typical experiment was as followed: 0.1 g glucose, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.15 g ZrOCl2, and 3.0 g isopropanol were introduced into the reactor. Then the reactor was sealed and immersed in the oil bath at 150 °C and stirred at 400 rpm. After 120 min, the reactor was removed from the oil bath and then cooled rapidly to room temperature with water. Other reactions were carried out by changing the reaction temperature, reaction time, glucose loading, [HO2CMMIm]Cl and ZrOCl2 amounts. For all the reactions, some amounts of brownish humins formed. Humin formation precluded a closed carbon balance analysis, and thus the only product analyzed was HMF. Each reaction was repeated at least three times, and the average yield was reported.

3.3. Sample Analysis

All the liquid samples were precipitated by centrifugation. The upper liquid was analyzed with a Shimadzu LC-20A liquid chromatography. HMF was measured with a SPD-20A UV detector at 280 nm and an InterSustain C18 column at 313 K, with a methanol/5 mM H2SO4 (8:2 v/v) binary solvent as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The amount of glucose was analyzed by introducing 2 mL of water into the upper liquid and then measured with a refractive index (RI-20A) detector, under the conditions of 333 K, with 5 mM H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1 as the mobile phase, with an Aminex HPX-87H Column.
In this manuscript, conversion and selectivity are defined as follows: conversion of glucose is defined as the amount of reacted glucose divided by the moles of initial glucose added; selectivity of HMF is defined as the moles of HMF produced divided by the amount of reacted glucose. The yield of HMF is defined as converted glucose multiplied by HMF selectivity.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a combination of the [HO2CMMIm]ClZrOCl2 catalyst system and isopropanol for HMF synthesis with glucose as the feedstock was developed. A series of experiments was examined over a broad range of conditions (reaction temperature, reaction time, water content, and catalyst and substrate loadings) to explore the rate and selectivity of glucose dehydration. Up to 43% HMF yield could be obtained with 0.03 g glucose, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.15 g ZrOCl2 in 3 mL isopropanol, at 150 °C reaction temperature and in 3 h reaction time.
It was demonstrated that [HO2CMMIm]Cl could increase HMF selectivity and that ZrOCl2 not only was favorable to glucose conversion but also increased HMF yield under the examined reaction conditions. ZrOCl2 affected the reaction in two opposite ways, and these opposite factors resulted in the highest yield corresponding to twice the mass loading of ZrOCl2. Glucose could be converted to intermediate species within a short time (about 5 min), and the intermediate species were not fructose according to the HPLC results; a longer reaction time (3 h or longer) were needed for HMF production from the intermediate species over the [HO2CMMIm]Cl-ZrOCl2 catalyst. The conversion of the intermediate species to HMF was dramatically increased by the addition of 3.17 wt % water. The performance of the catalytically active species could be enhanced by increasing the water content, and the concentration of the catalytically active species could be decreased by increasing the water content to a certain range. The kinetics data showed that a higher temperature accelerated the intermediate species dehydration reaction rate [51]. The glucose dehydration reaction was a strong endothermal reaction, thus a high reaction temperature was favorable to glucose and intermediate species conversion.

Author Contributions

Y.M., L.W., and R.Z. performed the experiments; H.L. and T.W. conceived the idea. All the authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21506246, U1703128, 21808192), and Chinese Government “Thousand Talent” Program (Y42H291501).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Antal, M.J., Jr.; Leesomboon, T.; Mok, W.S.; Richards, G.N. Mechanism of formation of 2-furaldehyde from D-xylose. Carbohydr. Res. Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 217, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, J.; Xu, W.; Ren, J.; Liu, X.; Lu, G.; Wang, Y. Efficient catalytic conversion of fructose into hydroxymethylfurfural by a novel carbon-based solid acid. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2678–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moreau, C.; Durand, R.; Razigade, S.; Duhamet, J.; Faugeras, P.; Rivalier, P.; Ros, P.; Avignon, G. Dehydration of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural over H-mordenites. Appl. Catal. A Gener. 1996, 145, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, J.; Ren, J.; Liu, X.; Xi, J.; Xia, Q.; Zu, Y.; Lu, G.; Wang, Y. Direct conversion of carbohydrates to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural using Sn-Mont catalyst. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2506–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Ren, J.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Xia, Y.; Lu, G.; Wang, Y. Mesoporous niobium phosphate: An excellent solid acid for the dehydration of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in water. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 2485–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amarasekara, A.S.; Williams, L.D.; Ebede, C.C. Mechanism of the dehydration of d-fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in dimethyl sulfoxide at 150 C: An NMR study. Carbohydrate research. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 3021–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, T.; Nolte, M.W.; Shanks, B.H. Catalytic dehydration of C6 carbohydrates for the production of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a versatile platform chemical. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 548–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moreau, C.; Finiels, A.; Vanoye, L. Dehydration of fructose and sucrose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in the presence of 1-H-3-methyl imidazolium chloride acting both as solvent and catalyst. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2006, 253, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hansen, T.S.; Mielby, J.; Riisager, A. Synergy of boric acid and added salts in the catalytic dehydration of hexoses to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in water. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Crisci, A.J.; Tucker, M.H.; Lee, M.-Y.; Jang, S.G.; Dumesic, J.A.; Scott, S.L. Acid-Functionalized SBA-15-Type Silica Catalysts for Carbohydrate Dehydration. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, H.; Zhao, Z.K.; Wang, Q. Catalytic Conversion of Inulin and Fructose into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural by Lignosulfonic Acid in Ionic Liquids. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 901–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Song, J.; Zhang, B.; Shi, J.; Ma, J.; Yang, G.; Han, B. Dehydration of Carbohydrates to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural in Ionic Liquids Catalyzed by Hexachlorotriphosphazene. Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 2079–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, R.; Chen, J.; Huang, X.; Chen, L.; Ma, L.; Li, X. Conversion of fructose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and alkyl levulinates catalyzed by sulfonic acid-functionalized carbon materials. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 2895–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tong, X.; Li, Y. Efficient and Selective Dehydration of Fructose to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Catalyzed by Brønsted-Acidic Ionic Liquids. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tong, X.; Ma, Y.; Li, Y. An efficient catalytic dehydration of fructose and sucrose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural with protic ionic liquids. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 1698–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hu, Z.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, L. Conversion of carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by acidic ionic liquids in dimethyl sulfoxide. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 50, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, H.; Holladay, J.E.; Brown, H.; Zhang, Z.C. Metal Chlorides in Ionic Liquid Solvents Convert Sugars to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural. Science 2007, 316, 1597–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Choudhary, V.; Mushrif, S.H.; Ho, C.; Anderko, A.; Nikolakis, V.; Marinkovic, N.S.; Frenkel, A.I.; Sandler, S.I.; Vlachos, D.G. Insights into the Interplay of Lewis and Brønsted Acid Catalysts in Glucose and Fructose Conversion to 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural and Levulinic Acid in Aqueous Media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3997–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, R.H.; He, Z.C.; Wang, H.W.; You, F.; Li, K.N. Study on self-tuning tyre friction control for developing main-servo loop integrated chassis control system. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 6649–6660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, X.; Zhang, H.; Meng, W.; Zhang, R.; Li, K.; Peng, T. Primary resonance analysis and vibration suppression for the harmonically excited nonlinear suspension system using a pair of symmetric viscoelastic buffers. Nonlinear Dyn. 2018, 94, 1243–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, R.; Ma, Y.; You, F.; Peng, T.; He, Z.; Li, K. Exploring to direct the reaction pathway for hydrogenation of levulinic acid into γ-valerolactone for future Clean-Energy Vehicles over a magnetic Cu-Ni catalyst. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 25185–25194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, R. High selective production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose by sulfonic acid functionalized SBA-15 catalyst. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 156, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deng, T.; Cui, X.; Qi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hou, X.; Zhu, Y. Conversion of carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by ZnCl2 in water. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5494–5496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. De, S.; Dutta, S.; Saha, B. Microwave assisted conversion of carbohydrates and biopolymers to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural with aluminium chloride catalyst in water. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2859–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Román-Leshkov, Y.; Chheda, J.N.; Dumesic, J.A. Phase Modifiers Promote Efficient Production of Hydroxymethylfurfural from Fructose. Science 2006, 312, 1933–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, Z.; Du, B.; Zhang, L.-J.; Da, Y.-X.; Quan, Z.-J.; Yang, L.-J.; Wang, X.-C. Conversion of carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural using polymer bound sulfonic acids as efficient and recyclable catalysts. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 9201–9205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saha, B.; Abu-Omar, M.M. Advances in 5-hydroxymethylfurfural production from biomass in biphasic solvents. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, T.; Glasper, J.A.; Shanks, B.H. Kinetics of glucose dehydration catalyzed by homogeneous Lewis acidic metal salts in water. Appl. Catal. A Gener. 2015, 498, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiong, H.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, R. Energy Recovery Strategy Numerical Simulation for Dual Axle Drive Pure Electric Vehicle Based on Motor Loss Model and Big Data Calculation. Complexity 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shi, J.; Gao, H.; Xia, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, H.; Zheng, C. Efficient process for the direct transformation of cellulose and carbohydrates to 5-(hydroxymenthyl)furfural with dual-core sulfonic acid ionic liquids and co-catalysts. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 7782–7790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Song, J.; Zhou, Y.; Han, B. Efficient conversion of glucose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by a common Lewis acid SnCl4 in an ionic liquid. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1746–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, L.; Song, J.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, B.; Zhou, H.; Fan, H.; Yang, Y.; Han, B. Very efficient conversion of glucose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in DBU-based ionic liquids with benzenesulfonate anion. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3935–3941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, W.; Holladay, J. Catalytic conversion of sugar into hydroxymethylfurfural in ionic liquids. Catal. Today 2013, 200, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Xie, H.; Liu, W.; Zhao, Z. Catalytic Conversion of Carbohydrates into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural by Germanium(IV) Chloride in Ionic Liquids. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Binder, J.B.; Raines, R.T. Simple Chemical Transformation of Lignocellulosic Biomass into Furans for Fuels and Chemicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1979–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, F.; Liu, Q.; Yue, M.; Bai, X.; Du, Y. Tantalum compounds as heterogeneous catalysts for saccharide dehydration to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4469–4471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ståhlberg, T.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, S.; Fristrup, P.; Riisager, A. Metal-Free Dehydration of Glucose to 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural in Ionic Liquids with Boric Acid as a Promoter. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 1456–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Qu, Y.; Huang, C.; Song, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, B. Efficient dehydration of glucose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by the ionic liquid,1-hydroxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 121, 462–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Heguaburu, V.; Franco, J.; Reina, L.; Tabarez, C.; Moyna, G.; Moyna, P. Dehydration of carbohydrates to 2-furaldehydes in ionic liquids by catalysis with ion exchange resins. Catal. Commun. 2012, 27, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jiménez-Morales, I.; Santamaría-González, J.; Jiménez-López, A.; Maireles-Torres, P. Glucose dehydration to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on zirconium containing mesoporous MCM-41 silica catalysts. Fuel 2014, 118, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kruger, J.S.; Nikolakis, V.; Vlachos, D.G. Aqueous-phase fructose dehydration using Brønsted acid zeolites: Catalytic activity of dissolved aluminosilicate species. Appl. Catal. A Gener. 2014, 469, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, E.Y.X. Chromium(0) Nanoparticles as Effective Catalyst for the Conversion of Glucose into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Osatiashtiani, A.; Lee, A.F.; Brown, D.R.; Melero, J.A.; Morales, G.; Wilson, K. Bifunctional SO4/ZrO2 catalysts for 5-hydroxymethylfufural (5-HMF) production from glucose. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jiménez-Morales, I.; Teckchandani-Ortiz, A.; Santamaría-González, J.; Maireles-Torres, P.; Jiménez-López, A. Selective dehydration of glucose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on acidic mesoporous tantalum phosphate. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 144, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ramli, N.A.S.; Amin, N.A.S. Thermo-kinetic assessment of glucose decomposition to 5-hydroxymethyl furfural and levulinic acid over acidic functionalized ionic liquid. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alam, M.I.; De, S.; Khan, T.S.; Haider, M.A.; Saha, B. Acid functionalized ionic liquid catalyzed transformation of non-food biomass into platform chemical and fuel additive. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 123, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chinnappan, A.; Baskar, C.; Kim, H. Biomass into chemicals: Green chemical conversion of carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in ionic liquids. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 63991–64002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hou, Q.; Zhen, M.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y.; Huang, F.; Zhang, S.; Li, W.; Ju, M. Tin phosphate as a heterogeneous catalyst for efficient dehydration of glucose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in ionic liquid. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 224, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dutta, S.; De, S.; Alam, M.I.; Abu-Omar, M.M.; Saha, B. Direct conversion of cellulose and lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals and biofuel with metal chloride catalysts. J. Catal. 2012, 288, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zakrzewska, M.E.; Bogel-Łukasik, E.; Bogel-Łukasik, R. Ionic Liquid-Mediated Formation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural—A Promising Biomass-Derived Building Block. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 397–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ma, Y.; Qing, S.; Wang, L.; Islam, N.; Guan, S.; Gao, Z.; Mamat, X.; Li, H.; Eli, W.; Wang, T. Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose by a thermo-regulated and recyclable Bronsted acidic ionic liquid catalyst. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 47377–47383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gallo, J.M.R.; Alonso, D.M.; Mellmer, M.A.; Dumesic, J.A. Production and upgrading of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural using heterogeneous catalysts and biomass-derived solvents. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dumesic, J.A. Analyses of Reaction Schemes Using De Donder Relations. J. Catal. 1999, 185, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dumesic, J.A. Reply to Finding the Rate-Determining Step in a Mechanism: Comparing DeDonder Relations with the “Degree of Rate Control”. J. Catal. 2001, 204, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mellmer, M.A.; Sener, C.; Gallo, J.M.R.; Luterbacher, J.S.; Alonso, D.M.; Dumesic, J.A. Solvent Effects in Acid-Catalyzed Biomass Conversion Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11872–11875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Carraher, J.M.; Fleitman, C.N.; Tessonnier, J.-P. Kinetic and Mechanistic Study of Glucose Isomerization Using Homogeneous Organic Brønsted Base Catalysts in Water. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3162–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Dehydration of glucose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF).
Scheme 1. Dehydration of glucose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF).
Catalysts 08 00467 sch001
Scheme 2. Glucose dehydration by [HO2CMMIm]Cl ionic liquid (IL)–ZrOCl2 in isopropanol.
Scheme 2. Glucose dehydration by [HO2CMMIm]Cl ionic liquid (IL)–ZrOCl2 in isopropanol.
Catalysts 08 00467 sch002
Figure 1. Effect of IL [HO2CMMIm]Cl loading on glucose dehydration.Experimental conditions: 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.1 g glucose, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time, 150 °C reaction temperature.
Figure 1. Effect of IL [HO2CMMIm]Cl loading on glucose dehydration.Experimental conditions: 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.1 g glucose, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time, 150 °C reaction temperature.
Catalysts 08 00467 g001
Figure 2. Influence of ZrOCl2 loading on glucose conversion.Reaction conditions: 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.1 g glucose, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time, 150 °C reaction temperature.
Figure 2. Influence of ZrOCl2 loading on glucose conversion.Reaction conditions: 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.1 g glucose, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time, 150 °C reaction temperature.
Catalysts 08 00467 g002
Figure 3. Effect of reaction time on glucose dehydration Reaction conditions: 0.15 ZrOCl2, 0.15 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.1 g glucose, 3.0 g isopropanol, 150 °C reaction temperature.
Figure 3. Effect of reaction time on glucose dehydration Reaction conditions: 0.15 ZrOCl2, 0.15 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.1 g glucose, 3.0 g isopropanol, 150 °C reaction temperature.
Catalysts 08 00467 g003
Figure 4. Effect of the reaction temperature on HMF yield, during glucose conversion.Experimental conditions: 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.1 g glucose, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time.
Figure 4. Effect of the reaction temperature on HMF yield, during glucose conversion.Experimental conditions: 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.1 g glucose, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time.
Catalysts 08 00467 g004
Figure 5. Effect of Substrate loading on glucose conversion.Reaction conditions: 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time, 150 °C reaction temperature.
Figure 5. Effect of Substrate loading on glucose conversion.Reaction conditions: 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time, 150 °C reaction temperature.
Catalysts 08 00467 g005
Figure 6. Effect of water content% on glucose dehydration.Experimental conditions: 0.1 g glucose, 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time, and 150 °C reaction temperature.
Figure 6. Effect of water content% on glucose dehydration.Experimental conditions: 0.1 g glucose, 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time, and 150 °C reaction temperature.
Catalysts 08 00467 g006
Figure 7. Arrhenius plot for glucose dehydration in isopropanol over [HO2CMMIm]Cl–ZrOCl2.
Figure 7. Arrhenius plot for glucose dehydration in isopropanol over [HO2CMMIm]Cl–ZrOCl2.
Catalysts 08 00467 g007
Table 1. Reaction rate constants (k) of glucose dehydration at various reaction temperatures a.
Table 1. Reaction rate constants (k) of glucose dehydration at various reaction temperatures a.
EntryTemperature °Ck × 103 (min−1)Correlation Coefficient
114089.10.986
2150118.70.989
3160152.40.977
a Experimental conditions: 3 h reaction time, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.1 g glucose, and 3 g isopropanol.
Table 2. The values of ΔH at different reaction temperatures.
Table 2. The values of ΔH at different reaction temperatures.
EntryReaction TemperatureΔH/kJ mol−1
114047.976
215047.975
316047.974
Table 3. Recycling of the catalyst.
Table 3. Recycling of the catalyst.
RunGlucose Conversion %HMF Yield %
19943
29941
39940
49939
59938
Reaction conditions: 0.15 g ZrOCl2, 0.05 g [HO2CMMIm]Cl, glucose 0.03 g, 3.0 g isopropanol, 3 h reaction time, 150 °C reaction temperature.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, H.; Wang, T.; Zhang, R. Selective Dehydration of Glucose into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural by Ionic Liquid-ZrOCl2 in Isopropanol. Catalysts 2018, 8, 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8100467

AMA Style

Ma Y, Wang L, Li H, Wang T, Zhang R. Selective Dehydration of Glucose into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural by Ionic Liquid-ZrOCl2 in Isopropanol. Catalysts. 2018; 8(10):467. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8100467

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Yubo, Lei Wang, Hongyi Li, Tianfu Wang, and Ronghui Zhang. 2018. "Selective Dehydration of Glucose into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural by Ionic Liquid-ZrOCl2 in Isopropanol" Catalysts 8, no. 10: 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8100467

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop