Next Article in Journal
A Review on Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3 over Mn–Based Catalysts at Low Temperatures: Catalysts, Mechanisms, Kinetics and DFT Calculations
Next Article in Special Issue
Newly Designed Ternary Metallic PtPdBi Hollow Catalyst with High Performance for Methanol and Ethanol Oxidation
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Effects of CeO2 Nanorods and CeO2 Nanoflakes on Ni–S Alloys in Hydrogen Evolution Reactions in Alkaline Solutions

Catalysts 2017, 7(7), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7070198

Article
Ordered PtSn/C Electrocatalyst: A High Performance Material for the Borohydride Electrooxidation Reaction
Electrocatalysis’ Laboratory, Chemistry Department, UNESP, Bauru 17033-360, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Luísa Margarida Martins
Received: 13 March 2017 / Accepted: 4 June 2017 / Published: 29 June 2017

Abstract

:
This work used a rotating disc electrode and quasi-steady state polarization curves to investigate the sodium borohydride electrooxidation of ordered intermetallic PtSn/C in alkaline solution. Under similar experimental conditions, PtSn/C proved to be a better electrocatalyst than Pt in an overall process that involved eight electrons. Assays performed in the presence of thiourea and S2− species evidenced that a chemical hydrolysis step took place, followed by electrochemical oxidation of the generated H2. The results presented herein suggest that PtSn/C constitutes a promising electrode material for application in alkaline borohydride fuel cell.
Keywords:
borohydride; hydrogen; PtSn/C; electrooxidation; kinect; mechanism

1. Introduction

It is undeniable that the biggest constraint for the wide use of hydrogen as a powerful and environmentally friendly fuel is the difficulty of its transport and storage. In this perspective, any effort to improve the transport and storage of the fuel becomes a great step forward to the use of the hydrogen fuel.
Alkaline fuel cells fed with hydrogen constitute one of the most environmentally friendly electrochemical devices for energy production developed to date. However, for these cells to become a viable alternative in fuel production, it is necessary to develop storage and transport in these cells even further, so that they meet practical and economic demands. Hydrogen production from water electrolysis at the purity levels required to feed fuel cells is still expensive [1], not to mention that CO originating from the biomass reforming process causes electrode passivation [2]. To overcome these limitations, one reasonable approach would be to generate hydrogen in a plant that produces electricity at low cost; i.e., a hydroelectric plant, and then transform it into a compound that is easier to transport and use in the PEM fuel cell located at the desired site. Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) fits such a purpose well—it originates from the reaction between NaH and B(CH3O)3, the so-called Brown- Schlesinger reaction [3].
4NaH + B(OCH3)3 → NaBH4 + 3NaOCH3
NaBH4 is a very stable white solid that melts at 400 °C at ordinary room pressure. It serves as a useful hydrogen vector with the additional bigger advantage of easy and safe transport and storage in comparison to the hydrogen gas. Once it reaches the site of electricity generation, NaBH4 acts as a hydrogen source that feeds the fuel cell. Electrochemical NaBH4 oxidation involves a series of chemical and electrochemical steps [4], as follows:
BH4 + H2O ↔ BH3HO + H2
H2 + 2HO → 2H+ + 2e
or
BH4 + H2O ↔ BH3HO + H2
BH3HO + 3HO → BO2 + 3/2H2 + 2H2O + 3e
H2 + 2HO → 2H+ + 2e
These processes involve a slightly more complex mechanism than direct hydrogen gas electrooxidation. In both cases, H2 originates from preceding chemical steps followed by direct fuel electrooxidation (Steps (2) or (5)) or another electrochemical intermediate step that also produces H2 (Step (4)). Even so, these pathways are thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable than the electrooxidation of any organic compound. Despite these advantages, investigations into active electrode materials for electrochemical borohydride oxidation are not conclusive, and the development of more efficient, stable, and inexpensive electrocatalysts remains a matter of extreme urgency.
Several papers have reported on the use of borohydride in fuel cells. Studies have focused on the performance of Pt, other noble metals, and a few other metallic materials toward borohydride [5,6,7,8,9]. Only a few papers have attempted to clarify the process of borohydride electrooxidation (BOR) on different electrode materials.
The last decade saw the publication of some interesting works.
Gyenge [10] used cyclic voltammetry, potentiometry, amperometry, coulometry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to study BOR on Pt and Au in NaOH solution. This author observed that catalytic borohydride hydrolysis, which produces H2, as well as direct ion oxidation at more positive potentials, influenced the voltammetric behavior of borohydride on Pt. The author also found that thiourea inhibited hydrolysis effectively, and that only the direct pathway occurred in the presence of this compound. To develop electrode materials for borohydride-fed fuel cells, Liu et al. [11] studied BOR on several electrocatalysts (Ni, Ni Raney, Pd, Pt, Cu, and Au). The open circuit potential depended on borohydride concentration and catalyst nature. The authors stated that BOR comprised a multi-step reaction with distinct pathways, and that the pathways depended on reaction conditions and catalyst nature. Martins et al. [12] employed cyclic voltammetry to evaluate BOR on Pt in the presence and absence of thiourea. These authors confirmed that thiourea suppressed hydrolysis and found that the optimum thiourea/NaBH4 concentration ratio was 0.6. Hydrolysis inhibition increased the coulombic efficiency of the fuel cell and drove eight electrons to the oxidation process. Concha and Chatenet [13] investigated BOR on Pt, Ag, and Pt-Ag (alloy) nanoparticles by cyclic voltammetry in NaOH solution. To compare different electrocatalysts, these authors measured the kinetic parameters and estimated the number of electrons exchanged by the borohydride anion (faradaic efficiency), to find that BOR was faster on Pt/C than on Ag/C even though both materials afforded similar Tafel slope values. The authors suggested that Pt/C promoted borohydride hydrolysis followed by direct hydrogen oxidation or direct BOR. As for Ag/C, the authors suggested that direct but incomplete BOR occurred on this electrode material. BOR on Pt-Ag alloys provided non-consistent data. Simões, Baranton, and Countanceau [14] verified how Pd, Au, and bimetallic Pd-Au nanoparticles supported on carbon, in different compositions and in alkaline medium, performed during BOR. Compared with Pt and Au, PdxAu1−x/C catalysts presented lower open circuit potential. By means of voltammetric measurements using a rotating disc electrode and hydrogen evolution estimates, these authors proposed that BOR on Pd-based nanocatalysts took place via two pathways: at negative potentials, the process involved a BH3OH intermediate that produced H2, whereas direct BOR involving a six electron pathway occurred at higher overpotentials. Finkelstein et al. [4] conducted a detailed electrochemical study of the BOR mechanism on Au and Pt surfaces by employing cyclic voltammetry using rotating disc and ring-disc electrode. These authors concluded that the electrode material determined the characteristics of the process; i.e., number of transferred electrons, heterogeneous charge transfer constant (kb), and presence of coupling reactions and adsorbed intermediates. Au sped up the hydrolysis step and generated H2 at the electrode surface. On the other hand, two main processes took place on Pt: at low potentials, a seven-electron process produced hydride on the Pt surface, and BH3OH adsorption poisoned the electrode; at higher overpotentials, a five- or six-electron process occurred on partially oxidized Pt surface with adsorbed HO and BH3OH. Liu, Yang, and Li [15] evaluated BOR on Au and Ag electrodes supported on carbon. Reaction efficiency depended on the [HO]/[BH4] ratio in the solution. A reaction involving nearly eight electrons took place for [HO]/[BH4] ≥ 5. Otherwise, H2 gas evolved and the fuel efficiency decreased. The authors suggested that the BH3OH ion originating from the chemical step diminished process efficiency. Supported by DFT calculations and using quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM). Lam et al. [16] investigated BOR on Pt under different experimental conditions, in the presence and absence of thiourea. The authors proposed that thiourea affected the electrode process, and that stable intermediates probably participated in the reaction. Santos et al. [17] compared the performances of Pt-rare Earth binary alloys with Pt as anode towards the BOR, by employing cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry techniques in the range of temperature of 25–55 °C. The calculated transfer coefficient ranged from 0.75 to 0.81 for Pt, Pt-Ho < Pt-Sm, and Pt-Ce materials. The number of transferred electrons were from 1.4 to 2.0 for the Pt-RE (rare earth) materials while for Pt it was increased to the range 2.5–3.1. The kinetics parameters showed the best performance for the Pt-Ho alloy. The authors concluded that the Pt-RE alloys do not presented better performance than pure Pt for the BOR. Hou and co-workers [18] published a paper that dealt with the performance of commercially available Pt3Sn/C (40 wt %, E-TEK) as anode for borohydride electrooxidation reaction in alkaline medium. The authors compared the results of Pt3Sn and Pt (30 wt %, De Nora) under the same experimental conditions and concluded on the crucial role of OH species in the electrode process. Even though they did not succeed determining ik for the processes occurring at both surfaces due to uncommon Koutecky–Levich relationship, it was proposed a mechanism based on the experimental findings like as number of transferred electrons and dependence on the OH species concentration. Merino-Jimenez et al. [19] evaluated the Pd-Ir (1:1) alloy covered by carbon microfibers and supported on a titanium plate as anode for the BOR. The authors calculated the number of transferred electrons in different concentration NaOH solutions and electrode potentials. The authors concluded that the Ir presented a beneficial effect enhancing the Pd catalytic activity towards the BOR. This enhancement was attributed to improvement of the BOR instead the hydrogen evolution reaction. Sljukic et al. [20] reported the results obtained from the Pt-Dy alloys for the BOR. According the results, the number of transferred electrons was found to be about 2.5. Cyclic voltammetry essays presented higher values for the current densities for Pt0.4Dy0.6 electrode in comparison to the Pt0.5Dy0.5, for the whole range of temperatures studied (25–55 °C). The alloys showed performances comparable to the pure Pt at room temperature and higher coulombic efficiency at higher temperatures. Direct Boroydride Fuel Cell tests presented promising results for the material Pt0.4Dy0.6 employed as anode, where the power density at 25 °C was 298 mW cm−1 and the current density was 595 mA cm−2 at 0.5 V potential.
An interesting study was reported by Sljukic et al. [21]. The authors presented the results obtained from the use of Pt/C and PtM/C (Pt0.75M0.25, M = Ni or Co) as anode for the BOR by using cyclic voltammetry and linear sweep with rotating disc electrode techniques. The results pointed to higher current density registered for the bimetallic Pt0.75Co0.25/C while Pt/C presented the poorer activity. The number of the transferred electrons calculated were 3.5; 6.6 and 4.5 for Pt/C; Pt0.75Ni0.25/C and Pt0.75Co0.25/C, respectively. The number of transferred electrons decreased with the increase of the NaBH4 concentration, same effect observed for the temperature change. The authors concluded that the better activity of the bimetallic alloys was credited to alteration of the electronic condition of the Pt sites. In a rare study concerning to the BOR on intermetallic materials, Yi et al. [22] synthesized and evaluated PtZn bimetallic catalysts supported on carbon and obtained the electrochemical characteristics for the reaction by employing cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry techniques. The authors studied three different compositions of the PtZn system and affirmed that the performances were better than Pt/C under the same experimental conditions towards the BH4 oxidation reaction. Moreover, the authors pointed out the outstanding performance of the catalyst Pt67Zn33/C due to the Zn synergetic effect in the alloy. Briega-Martos et al. [23] published the results obtained from the study of the BOR at Pt single crystal surfaces in NaOH solution by using stationary and rotating conditions. The results showed that the activity towards the BOR is structure sensitive. The (110) face presented the highest current densities at low potentials. At the limit of low potentials the accumulation of hydrolysis products of the borohydride was responsible to the increase of the current under stationary conditions since the products were not adsorbed on the surface and were easily removed under non-stationary diffusion condition. Recently, Grimer et al. [24] performed a very complete study of the borohydride oxidation reaction at Pd/C by using cyclic voltammetry, rotating disc electrode, chronoamperometry coupled to NMR, and FTIR in situ techniques. According to the analysis of the RDE technique, the number of transferred electrons was 4 at 0.4 V vs. RHE, while at 0.8 V the number of transferred electrons increased to 8 at 0.8 V the reaction is considered complete and at 0.4 V 2 different pathways are possible: one consisting of the total oxidation to BO2 and the production of two hydrogen molecules and through the second pathway occurred a four electron electrooxidation path resulting in BH2 species. The authors proposed that at low potentials surface sites are blocked by Pd-BH2OH species and for higher potentials this intermediate is completely oxidized via an eight electron process.
Electrocatalysis’ research group has published a series of papers on ordered intermetallic PtSn nanoparticles where it was found an outstanding performance of this material towards the hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR). In this perspective, the aim of the present work was to investigate the kinetic and mechanism of the BOR on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C in alkaline medium by means of the rotating disc electrode and quasi steady-state techniques.
Despite the numerous works investigating BOR on noble metals, the state-of-the-art information presented above shows that the development of new electrocatalysts for this reaction is still incipient. However, a great deal of work is still demanded to improve and make feasible the use of borohydride as a safe energy vector and source of hydrogen for electrochemical devices. So, the present study aims to provide an alternative and highly efficient anode material for BOR in alkaline media.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the RDE polarization curves obtained for BOR on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C electrodes in alkaline medium. BOR on PtSn/C generated a plateau-like profile that persisted all over the same rotation speed range. The shape of the polarization curve recorded for BOR on PtSn/C suggested that the adsorption and subsequent chemical and electrochemical steps improved along BOR on PtSn/C. Our previous paper had already discussed that adsorption site properties of the ordered intermetallic PtSn/C influenced the kinetics of hydrogen oxidation (HOR) positively [25]. According to that study, in the intermetallic structure Sn atom exerts a pronounced electronic donor effect to Pt adsorption site that improves in a great deal its adsorption characteristics. Such as improvement is even responsible to the lower CO poisoning susceptibility of the ordered intermetallic PtSn surface in comparison to the Pt.
The kinetics parameters were calculated according to the Koutecky–Levich equation
1 i = 1 i d + 1 i k = 1 i k + 1 B · c o   ω 1 2
where ik is the kinetic current density, id is the diffusion-limited density, B = 0.620nFD2/3υ−1/6, and co is the BH4 concentration.
The data extracted from the curves displayed in Figure 1 helped to build the Koutecky–Levich plots reproduced in Figure 2 and to determine the kinetic data listed in Table 1.
The PtSn/C material displayed remarkable kinetic performance. Considering the electrode surface geometric area, the ik value for the BOR taking place on PtSn/C was 0.08 A cm−2, which was significantly higher than the 0.06 A cm−2 value reported by Concha and Chatenet [13] for the reaction occurring on the surface of Pt/C nanoparticles under similar experimental conditions.
Figure 3 illustrates the steady state Tafel plots built from the data obtained for BOR on the assayed electrode material. Table 2 summarizes the corresponding b Tafel parameter (Tafel slope) and the calculated number of transferred electrons.
The surprisingly high b values obtained for PtSn/C were noteworthy and may have stemmed from the active layer effect [13], in which the hydrogen gas produced during the chemical (Reactions (1) and (3)) or electrochemical (reaction 4) steps may have been trapped in the porous surface of the electrode for further oxidation. Such a phenomenon could give rise to twice, three times, or even four times higher b values than the ones predicted for bulk materials (usually 0.059 or 0.12 V dec−1, depending on the rds) [7]. The same effect may also have accounted for the number of transferred electrons. The values calculated for the reaction on the materials studied in this work and the values determined for Pt electrodes in the literature agreed well. Therefore, BOR on the ordered intermetallic nanostructured PtSn/C materials and on Pt/C nanoparticles most probably followed the same mechanism, and any improvement in BOR may have resulted from influence of the material properties. On the basis of this viewpoint and as already mentioned for HOR [25], the enhanced adsorption properties of the Pt sites in PtSn/C may have stemmed from the electronic donor effect of Sn atoms [26,27]—this effect may also have greatly contributed to the electrocatalytic activity of PtSn/C toward BOR.
The number of electrons transferred in the reaction was determined by means of the equation [13]
id = 0.620.n.F.D2/3.C*.υ−1/61/2
where id is the diffusional limited current, n is the number of transferred electrons, C* is the BH4 concentration in mol L−1, ω is the electrode rotation speed, D is the BH4 diffusion coefficient (3.5 × 10−5 cm2 s−1 [13]), and υ is the kinematic viscosity (1.01 × 10−2 cm2 s−1 [13]). Hou et al. [18], in similar experiment on Pt3Sn/C (E-TEK) found also 8 as the number of transferred electrons. Unfortunately, the authors did not succeed determining the kinetic current jk.
According to various reports, the presence of thiourea enhances BOR on Pt surfaces because thiourea inhibits borohydride ion hydrolysis and improves hydrogen production and oxidation via faradaic processes [10,12,16]. Hence, in this work, we performed BOR in the presence of thiourea as well as S−2 to observe the role that these surface site blocking/modifier agents play in BOR kinetics. Is must be pointed out that while it is a rather solution effective agent, S−2 ion usually acts as surface modifier [28], so two different effects should be observed as an action of these agents. Figure 4 displays the RDE curves obtained for BOR on the PtSn/C material in the presence of thiourea and on S2−-surface-modified PtSn/C. Figure 4 also brings the curve recorded for BOR on a clean surface, for comparison purposes.
Thiourea acted intensely on BOR, to inhibit the electrode reaction, as corroborated by the ~0.65 V displacement in the onset potential toward more positive values and by the clearly inhibited electrode process. Although BOR on PtSn/C containing surface-adsorbed S2− did not experience such intense inhibition, the onset potential shifted toward slightly more positive potentials. The profile of the RDE curve also changed, suggesting that the reaction slowed down. The calculated kinetic parameters and the number of transferred electrons obtained from this study were jk = 39.7 mA mgPt−1 and n = 0.6 for the reaction that proceeded in the presence of thiourea, and jk = 2075 mA mgPt−1 and n = 6.4 for the reaction conducted on PtSn/C surface covered with adsorbed S2−. Together, the results reported herein demonstrated that the addition of thiourea or S2− did not enhance BOR on PtSn/C in alkaline medium. It is noteworthy that the addition of thiourea (hydrolysis step inhibitor) exerted a far more intense effect than the surface deposition of S2− (surface site modifier).
Considering the mechanisms earlier mentioned [4] it is easily realized regarding Step (3) that differences both mechanisms involves an intermediate produced from the hydrolysis step, in solution, that gives rise to the electrochemically generated hydrogen molecule, which, on its turn, is electrooxidized at the electrode surface. Our experimental results showed an almost complete inhibition of the BOR when the reaction was carried out in the presence of thiourea that implies that the main reactant responsible for the H2 production is being affect by the adsorption of thiourea molecules at the electrode surface. It should be pointed out that S−2 ion is a surface modifier agent that does not inhibit the hydrogen reaction at the electrode surface [28]. According to the exposed, it is reasonable to propose that the inhibition of the BOR was caused by the inhibition of Step (4), due to the inhibition of the adsorption of the BH3HO specie that was, on its turn, competitively blocked by the adsorption of the thiourea molecules.
In this perspective, it is possible to propose that the BOR occurs on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C particles in alkaline solution through the mechanism represented by Steps 3–5 as earlier cited in this paper.
Moreover, the proposed mechanism agrees very well to the number of electrons transferred (n = 8.0) displayed in Table 2.
This outstanding performance of the PtSn/C material may be attributed to the unique electronic condition of the Pt adsorption surface site caused by the electron donor effect provided by the Sn atoms in the hexagonal geometric structure [29].

3. Materials and Methods

Ordered intermetallic PtSn nanoparticles supported on carbon (Vulcan XC-72, Cabot) were synthesized via the polyol route proposed by Cable and Schaak [30]. To this end, proper amounts of H2Cl6Pt·6H2O (Merck, Hohenbrunn, Germany) and SnCl2 (Merck, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) were dissolved in tetraethylene glycol (Merck, Hohenbrunn, Germany) in the presence of carbon (CABOT, Billericay, MA, USA) previously treated in N2 (White Martins, Bauru, Brazil) atmosphere at 400 °C for 4 h. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) served as dispersing agent and stabilizer. Sodium borohydride (NaBH4, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was employed as an auxiliary reducing agent. The material was deposited on a polished glassy carbon surface as a thin film obtained from a dispersion consisting of the supported nanoparticles, isopropyl alcohol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), Nafion 117® (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and deionized water. The as-prepared surface was submitted to electrochemical studies. Characterization of the electrode material was performed by X-ray Diffraction, Electron Dispersive Spectroscopy, and Transmission Electron Microscopy (Figures S1, S2 and Table S1) [29].
The borohydride electrooxidation reaction (BOR) was studied by adding sodium borohydride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to a solution of KOH (Merck, Darmstadt, HE, Germany) at 0.2 mol L−1, which afforded a solution of BH4 at 1 mmol L−1. The as-prepared solution was deaerated by means of N2 (White Martins, Bauru, SP, Brazil) bubbling for 15 min before each set of electrochemical measurements. A large surface Pt wire and Reversible Hydrogen Electrode (RHE) worked as the counter-electrode and reference electrode, respectively. Thiourea (Q.M., F. Maia Prod. Quim., Charqueada, Brazil) solution was used in a concentration of 1 mmol L−1 and S−2 was deposited on the PtSn/C particles by immersion in a 10 mmol L−1 Na2S.9H2O (VETEC, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) as previously described in details in our paper [28]. During all sets of experiments, N2 was passed over the solution. BOR was studied by the Rotating Disc Electrode (RDE) technique using the Linear Sweep Voltammetry (20 mV s−1) setup. Several rotation speeds (between 100 and 3500 rpm) were investigated for each electrode potential ranging from 0.05 to 1.1 V.
Quasi steady-state data were also collected for BOR on the electrode material with the aid of Linear Sweep Voltammetry at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1. The selected rotation speed was 1500 rpm for all the steady-state measurements. Different rotation speeds were assayed, but no differences were observed.
The same experimental methodology depicted above was also employed for experiments conducted with addition of thiourea at 1 mmol L−1 to the solution or after deposition of S2− on the electrode. As often mentioned in the literature, thiourea inhibits BH4 hydrolysis [10,12,16], whereas S2− blocks or modifies the electrode surface. Both play an important role in the hydrogen reaction mechanism [28].

4. Conclusions

This study investigated BOR on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C surface in a solution of KOH at 0.2 mol L−1. In similar experimental conditions, the reaction kinetics was faster on PtSn/C material as compared with Pt/C. An eight-electron process took place, and the proposed mechanism consisted of chemical hydrolysis of the BH4 ion, to produce H2 and BH3HO ion, which in turn also produces H2 underwent direct electrooxidation at the electrode surface. The PtSn/C electrode proved to be a promising material to oxidize borohydride anions in alkaline fuel cells and becomes a real contributor to the wide use of hydrogen as efficient and environmentally friendly energy vector.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/7/7/198/s1, Figure S1: X-ray diffractogram of the ordered intermetallic PtSn/C. The black profile refers to the recorded curve; the blue lines correspond to data for the standard materials compiled in the Database Crystmet, Figure S2: TEM and histogram for the average particle diameter of ordered intermetallic PtSn/C, Table S1: Mean atomic ratio medium of the elements in the synthesized materials ordered intermetallic PtSn/C.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for the financial support of this work (#2013/05634-8). F. Bortoloti thanks FAPESP for the undergraduate fellowship (#2010/07798-0).

Author Contributions

F.B. conceived and designed the experiments, performed experiments and analyzed the data. A.C.D.A. supervised the research, conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vielstich, W.; Lamm, A.; Gasteiger, H.A. Handbook of Fuel Cells: Fundamentals Technology and Applications; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2003; Volume 3, Part 1; pp. 79–120. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gasteiger, H.A.; Markovic, N.M.; Ross, P.N., Jr. H2 and CO Electrooxidation on Well-Characterized Pt, Ru, and Pt-Ru. 1. Rotating Disk Electrode Studies of the Pure Gases Including Temperature Effects. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 8290–8301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Santos, D.M.F.; Sequeira, C.A.C. Sodium borohydride as a fuel for the future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 3980–4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Finkeltein, D.A.; Da Mota, N.; Cohen, J.L.; Abruña, H.D. Rotating Disk Electrode (RDE) Investigation of BH4 and BH3OH Electro-oxidation at Pt and Au: Implications for BH4 Fuel Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 19700–19712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.S.; Kang, Y.M.; Song, M.S.; Rajendran, S.; Han, S.C.; Jung, D.H.; Lee, J.Y. Carbon-Supported and Unsupported Pt Anodes for Direct Borohydride Liquid Fuel Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A1039–A1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Atwan, M.H.; Macdonald, C.L.B.; Northwood, D.O.; Gyenge, E.L. Colloidal Au and Au-alloy catalysts for direct borohydride fuel cells: Electrocatalysis and fuel cell performance. J. Power Sources 2006, 158, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gyenge, E.; Atwan, M.; Northwood, D. Electrocatalysis of Borohydride Oxidation on Colloidal Pt and Pt-Alloys (Pt-Ir, Pt-Ni, and Pt-Au) and Application for Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell Anodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, A150–A158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kiran, V.; Ravikumar, T.; Kalyanasundaram, N.T.; Krishnamurty, S.; Shukla, A.K.; Sampath, S. Electro-Oxidation of Borohydride on Rhodium, Iridium, and Rhodium–Iridium Bimetallic Nanoparticles with Implications to Direct Borohydride Fuel Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, B1201–B1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yi, L.; Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Yi, W.; Wang, X. Carbon supported Pt–Sn nanoparticles as anode catalyst for direct borohydride–hydrogen peroxide fuel cell: Electrocatalysis and fuel cell performance. J. Power Sources 2013, 224, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gyenge, E. Electrooxidation of borohydride on platinum and gold electrodes: Implications for direct borohydride fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 49, 965–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, B.H.; Li, Z.P.; Suda, S. Electrocatalysts for the anodic oxidation of borohydrides. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 49, 3097–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martins, J.I.; Nunes, M.C.; Koch, R.; Martins, L.; Bazzaoui, M. Electrochemical oxidation of borohydride on platinum electrodes: The influence of thiourea in direct fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 6443–6449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Concha, B.M.; Chatenet, M. Direct oxidation of sodium borohydride on Pt, Ag and alloyed Pt–Ag electrodes in basic media: Part II. Carbon-supported nanoparticles. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 6130–6139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Simões, M.; Baranton, S.; Coutanceau, C. Electrooxidation of Sodium Borohydride at Pd, Au, and PdxAu1−x Carbon-Supported Nanocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 13369–13376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, B.H.; Yang, J.Q.; Li, Z.P. Concentration ratio of [OH]/[BH4]: A controlling factor for the fuel efficiency of borohydride electro-oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 9436–9443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lam, V.W.S.; Kannangara, D.C.W.; Alfantazi, A.; Gyenge, E.L. Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance Study of Borohydride Electro-Oxidation on Pt: The Effect of Borohydride Concentration and Thiourea Adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 2727–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Santos, D.M.F.; Saturnino, P.G.; Maccio, D.; Saccone, A.; Sequeira, C.A.C. Platinum-rare earth intermetallic alloys as anode electrocatalysts for borohydride oxidation. Catal. Today 2011, 170, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hou, J.; Yang, M.; Ellis, M.W.; Moore, R.B. Direct Borohydride Oxidation at Carbon Supported Pt-Sn Binary Catalyst. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, F412–F418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Merino-Jimenez, I.; Janik, M.J.; Ponce de Leon, C.; Walsh, F.C. Pd-Ir alloy as an anode material for borohydride oxidation. J. Power Sources 2014, 269, 498–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sljukic, B.; Milikic, J.; Santos, D.M.F.; Sequeira, C.A.C.; Maccio, D.; Saccone, A. Electrocatalytic performance of Pt-Dy alloys for direct borohydridefuel cells. J. Power Sources 2014, 272, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sljukic, B.; Milikic, J.; Santos, D.M.F.; Sequeira, C.A.C. Carbon-supported Pt0.75M0.25 (M = Ni or Co) electrocatalysts for borohydride oxidation. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 107, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yi, L.; Wei, W.; Zhao, C.; Yang, C.; Tian, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, X. Electrochemical oxidation of sodium borohydride on carbon supported Pt-Zn nanoparticle bimetallic catalyst and its implications to direct borohydride-hydrogen peroxide fuel cell. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 158, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Briega-Martos, V.; Herrero, E.; Feliu, J.M. Borohydride electro-oxidation on Pt single crystal electrodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 51, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grimmer, C.; Grandi, M.; Zacharias, R.; Cermenek, B.; Weber, H.; Morais, C.; Napporn, T.W.; Weinberger, S.; Schenck, A.; Hacker, V. The electrooxidation of borohydride: A mechanistic study on palladium (Pd/C) applying RRDE, 11B-NMR and FTIR. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 180, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Santos, E.; Pinto, L.M.C.; Soldano, G.; Innocente, A.F.; Angelo, A.C.D.; Schmickler, W. Hydrogen oxidation on ordered intermetallic phases of platinum and tin—A combined experimental and theoretical study. Catal. Today 2013, 202, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mukerjee, S.; McBreen, J. An In Situ X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Investigation of the Effect of Sn Additions to Carbon-Supported Pt Electrocatalysts: Part I. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, 146, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shukla, A.K.; Arico, A.S.; El-Khatib, K.M.; Kim, H.; Antonucci, P.L.; Antonucci, V. An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study on the effect of Ru and Sn additions to platinised carbons. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1999, 137, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Angelo, A.C.D. Electrocatalysis of hydrogen evolution reaction on Pt electrode surface-modified by S−2 chemisorption. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bortoloti, F.; Garcia, A.C.; Angelo, A.C.D. Electronic effect in intermetallic electrocatalysts with low susceptibility to CO poisoning during hydrogen oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 10816–10824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cable, R.E.; Schaak, R.E. Low-Temperature Solution Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Binary Intermetallic Compounds Using the Polyol Process. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6835–6841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. RDE profiles for BOR at 1 mmol L−1 on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C in 0.2 mol L−1 KOH solution, at room temperature. Scan rate: 20 mV s−1.
Figure 1. RDE profiles for BOR at 1 mmol L−1 on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C in 0.2 mol L−1 KOH solution, at room temperature. Scan rate: 20 mV s−1.
Catalysts 07 00198 g001
Figure 2. Koutecky–Levich plot for BOR on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C surface in a 0.2 mol L−1 KOH +1 mmol L−1 NaBH4 solution at room temperature. Data obtained at 0.6 V.
Figure 2. Koutecky–Levich plot for BOR on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C surface in a 0.2 mol L−1 KOH +1 mmol L−1 NaBH4 solution at room temperature. Data obtained at 0.6 V.
Catalysts 07 00198 g002
Figure 3. Tafel plot for BOR on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C nanoparticles in a 0.2 mol L−1 KOH + 1 mmol L−1 NaBH4 solution at room temperature.
Figure 3. Tafel plot for BOR on ordered intermetallic PtSn/C nanoparticles in a 0.2 mol L−1 KOH + 1 mmol L−1 NaBH4 solution at room temperature.
Catalysts 07 00198 g003
Figure 4. RDE curves for BOR on PtSn/C in a solution of KOH at 0.2 mol L−1 after addition of thiourea at 1 mmol L−1 or in the presence of surface-deposited S2−. Scan rate: 20 mV s−1.
Figure 4. RDE curves for BOR on PtSn/C in a solution of KOH at 0.2 mol L−1 after addition of thiourea at 1 mmol L−1 or in the presence of surface-deposited S2−. Scan rate: 20 mV s−1.
Catalysts 07 00198 g004aCatalysts 07 00198 g004b
Table 1. Kinetic parameters determined for BOR on ordered intermetallic nanostructured PtSn/C in alkaline medium.
Table 1. Kinetic parameters determined for BOR on ordered intermetallic nanostructured PtSn/C in alkaline medium.
Materialjk (mA mgPt−1) *Maximum jd (mA mgPt−1) *co.B (mA mgPt−1 (rad s−1)−1/2)
PtSn/C2738.5616.743.3
* jk and jd are respectively ik/Pt mass and id/Pt mass.
Table 2. Mechanistic and kinetic parameters for BOR on ordered intermetallic and PtSn/C nanoparticles in alkaline medium.
Table 2. Mechanistic and kinetic parameters for BOR on ordered intermetallic and PtSn/C nanoparticles in alkaline medium.
Materialb (V dec−1)jk (mA cm−2)n
PtSn/C0.20848.0
Pt/C *0.20608.1
* Results obtained from reference [13].

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Back to TopTop