Next Article in Journal
Advanced Electrolytic Water Catalysts: A Key Technology Empowering China’s “Dual Carbon” Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the Influence of Metal Oxide Catalyst Performance in Sulfur Compounds Removal from Natural Gas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intensification of Photo-Assisted Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water Treatment: A Critical Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Photoassisted and Photocatalytic Processes for Water Remediation

by
Jaime Carbajo
1,* and
Patricia García-Muñoz
2,*
1
Chemical and Materials Engineering Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Pl. de las Ciencias, 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2026, 16(5), 474; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16050474
Submission received: 28 April 2026 / Accepted: 18 May 2026 / Published: 20 May 2026
Since heterogeneous photocatalysis emerged as a promising approach able to harness light energy—ideally solar radiation—to drive oxidation and reduction as effective technologies for water remediation under mild conditions [1], research has increasingly focused on bridging the gap between laboratory-scale studies and real-world applications. This includes addressing the challenges posed by complex water matrices, developing visible-light-active and stable photocatalysts, and integrating photocatalytic processes with complementary technologies. In this context, this Special Issue entitled “Advances in Photoassisted and Photocatalytic Processes for Water Remediation” presents a collection of contributions that address key aspects such as emerging pollutant removal, real wastewater treatment, catalyst design, and the scale-up of photoassisted AOPs.
The presence of pharmaceuticals and other contaminants in real water matrices, such as greywater, represents a major challenge for photocatalytic processes, as background constituents can significantly affect treatment efficiency. Inorganic ions, natural organic matter, and surfactants may act as radical scavengers or interfere with light penetration, thereby limiting degradation performance. Understanding these matrix effects is therefore essential for advancing photocatalysis toward realistic and scalable applications [2,3].
In this context, (Contribution 1) evaluate the photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals—naproxen, metformin, and sulfamethoxazole—in membrane bioreactor-treated greywater, demonstrating that efficient removal can be achieved even in complex matrices. The study highlights the influence of background constituents on degradation kinetics and supports the feasibility of photocatalysis as a post-treatment step for water reuse. Complementarily, (Contribution 2) investigate photocatalytic treatment of greywater under realistic conditions, emphasizing the role of operational parameters and matrix composition on process performance. Together, these contributions provide valuable insight into the challenges and opportunities associated with real wastewater applications.
The study of (Contribution 3) demonstrates an effective and sustainable approach for naphthalene (NAP) removal from water using persulfate activated by Fe(III)–goethite and LED irradiation at natural pH. Optimal conditions were identified, achieving over 92% NAP removal while reducing toxicity. The use of a solid iron source, mild operating conditions, and energy-efficient LED light highlights the environmental sustainability of this treatment for water remediation as previously described by García-Muñoz et al. [4].
The scale-up of heterogeneous photocatalysis also remains a critical challenge, particularly due to issues related to catalyst recovery and reactor design. Immobilized photocatalytic systems have emerged as a promising alternative to slurry reactors, as they enable continuous operation and facilitate integration into treatment systems. However, their practical implementation depends on the development of scalable fabrication methods that ensure both activity and durability [5,6].
(Contribution 4) report the fabrication of titania–siloxane photocatalytic coatings using low-temperature UV and plasma curing methods, enabling deposition on temperature-sensitive substrates. The resulting films exhibit effective photocatalytic activity while maintaining structural integrity, and their compatibility with roll-to-roll manufacturing provides a clear pathway toward large-scale production. This work directly addresses key engineering challenges associated with the practical deployment of photocatalytic technologies.
One of the main limitations of conventional photocatalysts such as TiO2 is their restricted activity under UV irradiation. To overcome this limitation, band-gap engineering strategies, particularly anionic doping, have been widely explored to extend light absorption into the visible region, with nitrogen doping being the most studied anion to effectively modify the electronic structure and enhance photocatalytic activity [7,8].
Another key and extended strategy involves modifying titania to increase its activity and to avoid the recombination of photogenerated charges. In this sense, (Contribution 5) hydrothermally synthesized Sr-doped TiO2 for the electrocatalytic application of water splitting; 1% Sr-doped TiO2 nanoparticles showed photocatalytic activity, and 1% and 5% Sr-doped TiO2 depicted maximum current density for both HER and OER.
The contribution of (Contribution 6) showed the process to obtain a ZnIn2S4 photocatalyst with the aim of Cr(VI) photoreduction in water, another typical use of photocatalysis. The employed solvents in the synthesis protocol and the methods were critical for the removal yields of Cr(VI), not just because of the band-gap-associated changes but also because of the resulting surface morphology.
In another work, a zirconia-based photocatalyst was synthesized by (Contribution 7) via a simple thermal decomposition of UiO-66, with Ti(IV) and Hf(IV) cations used to tailor its photocatalytic performance. Among all samples, tetragonal ZrO2 showed the highest activity, achieving 89% methyl orange degradation under UV irradiation in 300 min, outperforming monoclinic and mixed oxides and comparable to commercial anatase TiO2.
Other strategies to overcome intrinsic limitations such as wide band gaps and rapid charge recombination include composite formation and the use of alternative semiconductors, which have been widely explored to enhance photocatalytic performance under visible light [3,9].
Another contribution to this Special Issue is a study carried out by (Contribution 8), who obtained Bi2O3/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites. The heterojunction was applied for the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange in the water phase. The Bi2O3/CoFe2O4 exhibited narrowed band gaps (1.58–1.62 eV) and enhanced activity compared to the individual oxides. An equimolar nanocomposite showed the best performance due to a synergistic type-II heterojunction effect.
In this context, (Contribution 9) investigate N-doped photocatalysts, demonstrating that nitrogen incorporation enhances light absorption and improves photocatalytic performance compared to undoped materials. The study highlights the relationship between electronic structure modification and degradation efficiency, reinforcing the importance of rational catalyst design for the development of visible-light-driven systems in water remediation. For their part, (Contribution 10) present a comprehensive review of photocatalytic systems for CEC removal, focusing on catalyst modification strategies and process intensification. The authors discuss alternative materials such as g-C3N4 and WO3, as well as the benefits of combining photocatalysis with ozonation to enhance degradation efficiency. This contribution provides a critical overview of current strategies to improve photocatalytic performance and supports the development of more efficient and scalable treatment systems.
Photocatalytic performance is fundamentally governed by material properties such as band-gap energy, band-edge positions, and charge carrier dynamics. These factors determine light absorption, redox capability, and recombination rates, and are therefore critical for both water splitting and pollutant degradation processes. Transition metal oxides remain among the most studied materials, although challenges related to efficiency and stability persist [3,10]. In this regard, (Contribution 11) provide a detailed analysis of photocatalytic water splitting based on transition metal oxides, focusing on the relationship between physicochemical properties and performance. The work identifies key limitations such as recombination losses and highlights design criteria for improving efficiency. These insights are directly relevant to the development of advanced photocatalysts for water remediation.
On the other hand, an increasing trend consists of modeling the newly developed processes to validate the technology. In this sense, (Contribution 12) developed a model for simulating the degradation of pollutants via a combined bio-chemical treatment with good fittings (R2 = 0.998).
Finally, the increasing complexity of wastewater treatment has driven the development of hybrid systems combining photocatalysis with complementary technologies. Such integrated approaches can overcome the limitations of individual processes and enhance overall efficiency, particularly in real water matrices [2,6]. In this framework, (Contribution 13) present a comprehensive review of photoassisted AOPs for micropollutant removal, with particular emphasis on their integration with other treatment technologies. The authors critically analyze combined systems, discussing their mechanisms, advantages, and limitations, and identify key factors for optimization and scale-up. This contribution provides a valuable overview of current trends and future directions in hybrid photocatalytic systems.
The contributions collected in this Special Issue highlight the rapid progress and increasing maturity of photoassisted and photocatalytic processes for water remediation. From fundamental material design to process integration and real wastewater applications, these works collectively address key challenges associated with efficiency, scalability, and practical implementation. In particular, the importance of understanding real matrix effects, developing visible-light-active materials, and integrating photocatalysis with complementary technologies emerges as a unifying theme. These advances contribute to paving the way toward sustainable and efficient water treatment solutions.

Funding

MAINSTREAM PROJECT (PCI2025-167062-2) funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and co-funded by the European Union.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Ojobe, B.; Zouzelka, R.; Satkova, B.; Vagnerova, M.; Nemeskalova, A.; Kuchar, M.; Bartacek, J.; Rathousky, J. Photocatalytic Removal of Pharmaceuticals from Greywater. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11091125.
  • Aslam, M.; Fazal, D.B.; Ahmad, F.; Fazal, A.B.; Abdullah, A.Z.; Ahmed, M.; Qamar, M.; Rafatullah, M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Recalcitrant Pollutants of Greywater. Catalysts 2022, 12, 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050557.
  • Sánchez-Yepes, A.; Lorenzo, D.; Sáez, P.; Romero, A.; Santos, A. Abatement of Naphthalene by Persulfate Activated by Goethite and Visible LED Light at Neutral pH: Effect of Common Ions and Organic Matter. Catalysts 2022, 12, 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12070732.
  • Svoboda, T.; Veselý, M.; Bartoš, R.; Homola, T.; Dzik, P. Low-Temperature Mineralisation of Titania-Siloxane Composite Layers. Catalysts 2021, 11, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010050.
  • Fazil, M.; Ahmad, T. Pristine TiO2 and Sr-Doped TiO2 Nanostructures for Enhanced Photocatalytic and Electrocatalytic Water Splitting Applications. Catalysts 2023, 13, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010093.
  • Song, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Huang, L.; Xie, J.; Han, L.; Zheng, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H. Study on Optimum Preparation Conditions of ZnIn2S4 to Effectively Reduce Cr(VI) under Visible Light Radiation. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111429.
  • Jannah, I.N.A.; Sekarsari, H.F.; Mulijani, S.; Wijaya, K.; Wibowo, A.C.; Patah, A. Facile Synthesis of Various ZrO2 Phases and ZrO2-MO2 (M = Ti, Hf) by Thermal Decomposition of a Single UiO-66 Precursor for Photodegradation of Methyl Orange. Catalysts 2022, 12, 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12060609.
  • Naveed, A.B.; Riaz, F.; Mahmood, A.; Shahid, A.; Aqeel, S. A Facile Synthesis of Bi2O3/CoFe2O4 Nanocomposite with Improved Synergistic Photocatalytic Potential for Dye Degradation. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11101180.
  • Jiang, Z.; Wickramasinghe, S.; Tsai, Y.H.; Samia, A.C.S.; Gurarie, D.; Yu, X. Modeling and Experimental Studies on Adsorption and Photocatalytic Performance of Nitrogen-Doped TiO2 Prepared via the Sol–Gel Method. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10121449.
  • Fernandes, E.; Gomes, J.; Martins, R.C. Semiconductors Application Forms and Doping Benefits to Wastewater Treatment: A Comparison of TiO2, WO3, and g-C3N4. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12101218.
  • Mikaeili, F.; Gilmore, T.; Gouma, P.-I. Photochemical Water Splitting via Transition Metal Oxides. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111303.
  • Makgato, S.; Nkhalambayausi-Chirwa, E. An Evaluation of the Kinetic Properties Controlling the Combined Chemical and Biological Treatment of Toxic Recalcitrant Organic Compounds from Aqueous Solution. Catalysts 2022, 12, 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12090965.
  • Rodríguez-Chueca, J.; Carbajo, J.; García-Muñoz, P. Intensification of Photo-Assisted Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water Treatment: A Critical Review. Catalysts 2023, 13, 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13020401.

References

  1. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ahmed, S.; Rasul, M.G.; Brown, R.; Hashib, M.A. Influence of parameters on the heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of pollutants in wastewater: A short review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104807. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, W.; Yu, H.; Quan, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, H. Recent advances in photocatalytic removal of emerging contaminants in water: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 131145. [Google Scholar]
  4. García-Muñoz, P.; Pliego, G.; Zazo, J.; Bahamonde, A.; Casas, J.A. Ilmenite (FeTiO3) as low cost catalyst for advanced oxidation processes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, X.; Mao, S.S. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6503–6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, A.; Khan, M.; He, J.; Lo, I.M.C. Recent developments and challenges in photocatalytic water treatment using advanced oxidation processes. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 51, 103368. [Google Scholar]
  7. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Ohwaki, T.; Aoki, K.; Taga, Y. Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 2001, 293, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Di Paola, A.; García-López, E.; Marcì, G.; Palmisano, L. A survey of photocatalytic materials for environmental remediation under visible light. Catalysts 2022, 12, 117. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ong, W.-J.; Tan, L.-L.; Ng, Y.H.; Yong, S.-T.; Chai, S.-P. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7159–7329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kudo, A.; Miseki, Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carbajo, J.; García-Muñoz, P. Advances in Photoassisted and Photocatalytic Processes for Water Remediation. Catalysts 2026, 16, 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16050474

AMA Style

Carbajo J, García-Muñoz P. Advances in Photoassisted and Photocatalytic Processes for Water Remediation. Catalysts. 2026; 16(5):474. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16050474

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carbajo, Jaime, and Patricia García-Muñoz. 2026. "Advances in Photoassisted and Photocatalytic Processes for Water Remediation" Catalysts 16, no. 5: 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16050474

APA Style

Carbajo, J., & García-Muñoz, P. (2026). Advances in Photoassisted and Photocatalytic Processes for Water Remediation. Catalysts, 16(5), 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16050474

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop