Experimental Study on the Influence of Metal Oxide Catalyst Performance in Sulfur Compounds Removal from Natural Gas
Abstract
1. Introduction
Metals Selection
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. The Analysis of Surface Morphology of the Prepared Catalyst
2.1.1. Analysis of the BET Data
2.1.2. XRD Analysis and Catalytic Implications of the Catalysts
2.1.3. FTIR Analysis of the Catalysts
2.1.4. EDS Analysis of the Catalysts
2.1.5. SEM Analysis of the Catalysts
2.1.6. XPS Analysis of the Catalysts
2.2. Catalyst Adsorption Performance in Removing Sulfur Compounds from Natural Gas
2.3. Performance Summary
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Materials
3.2. Catalyst Preparation
3.3. Catalyst Testing Process
4. Conclusions
- The study demonstrated that metal (transition metal) oxide on halloysite (support) catalysts significantly enhances sulfur uptake compared to pristine halloysite support, confirming that halloysite primarily functions as a structurally stable support and dispersion medium, while the deposited metal oxides provide the dominant adsorption-active and redox-active sites needed for desulfurization. However, the mesoporous tubular structure of the support contributes to physical adsorption and facilitates diffusion and accessibility of sulfur-containing molecules to the active metal oxide phases.
- The Mn catalyst exhibited the best performance among the single-metal catalysts. Under the applied operating conditions (36 mL/min, 200 psi, 25 °C, and 200 ppm ethyl mercaptan in methane), a breakthrough time of approximately 240 min and sulfur adsorption capacity of 8.76 mg S/g were achieved. This improved performance is likely attributed to the mixed Mn3+/Mn4+ redox states and oxygen mobility of MnOx. In contrast, NiO exhibited the lowest performance (90 min, 3.29 mg S/g), indicating that redox flexibility, oxygen mobility, and metal dispersion play a more critical role in sulfur removal.
- The multi-metal base catalyst (Zn-Cu-Mn-Ni) showed improved performance (300 min, 10.95 mg S/g) compared to single-metal systems, confirming that synergistic interactions between adsorption-active (CuO, NiO) and redox-active (MnOx) components enhance sulfur uptake and delay breakthrough. The improved performance was further supported by XRD, SEM, BET, and XPS analyses, which indicated improved dispersion, multiple accessible oxidation states, and stronger metal–support interactions within the multi-metal oxide system.
- The incorporation of palladium resulted in the highest catalytic performance (630 min, 23 mg S/g). The presence of Pd2+ species, as observed from XPS analysis, suggests that Pd likely modifies the electronic environment of the multi-metal oxide system and enhances electron transfer between the metal oxide components. The observed enhancement is consistent with a spillover-assisted chemisorption–redox mechanism, in which sulfur-containing molecules initially adsorb onto Cu2+ and Ni2+ sites, followed by activation and partial oxidation through Mn3+/Mn4+ redox couples and Pd-assisted electron transfer pathways [1,50]. Although post-reaction sulfur species were not directly characterized, the desulfurization process is believed to involve reactive chemisorption and oxidation-assisted adsorption rather than purely physical adsorption.
- The results further revealed that metal precursor loss during filtration-based synthesis reduced active site density, contributing to underperformance in the catalysts; thus, metal retention, dispersion, oxidation and electronic structure are identified as key factors governing sulfur adsorption and catalyst effectiveness. While the synthesis route produced highly functional catalysts, alternative preparation methods may further improve metal retention and catalyst adsorption efficiency.
- Catalysts containing metal oxides with relatively smaller bandgaps exhibited improved sulfur adsorption performance. Although direct bandgap measurements were not performed in the present study, the literature reports suggest that enhanced charge-transfer capability and surface electron mobility in certain transition metal oxides may contribute to stronger sulfur–surface interactions and improved adsorption behavior [4]. In the present system, the sulfur removal mechanism is proposed to involve a combined physical adsorption, reactive chemisorption, and oxidation-assisted pathway, where the halloysite support contributes to diffusion and physisorption, while the transition metal oxides facilitate sulfur activation and redox transformation.
- When compared with previously reported sulfur removal materials, the halloysite-supported mixed metal oxide catalysts developed in this study demonstrate competitive and practically relevant organo-sulfur adsorption performance under mild operating conditions [1,3,4,50]. The combination of structural simplicity, low-cost support material, and enhanced sulfur removal capability suggests strong potential for application in natural gas purification systems.
- Although the present study demonstrates promising initial performance for ethyl mercaptan removal using halloysite-supported mixed metal oxide catalysts, the work should be regarded as a fundamental proof-of-concept study focused on catalyst synthesis, characterization, and initial adsorption behavior under controlled conditions rather than fully optimized industrial technology. Additional investigations are still required to fully evaluate catalyst durability, regeneration behavior, sulfur poisoning resistance, metal retention, and long-term operational stability. In the present work, post-reaction and post-regeneration characterization were not performed; therefore, the possible formation of stable metal sulfide or sulfate species cannot be ruled out. Future studies will therefore focus on multi-cycle adsorption–regeneration testing, post-reaction SEM/XPS/XRD characterization to verify preservation of the halloysite nanotubular structure, evaluation of sulfur-induced surface transformations, and assessment of catalyst stability under extended operating conditions. Advanced analyses such as XPS S 2p, XRD, EDS, and ICP-OES will provide deeper insight into sulfur adsorption mechanisms, metal oxidation state evolution, possible sulfide formation pathways, and catalyst deactivation behavior. Nevertheless, the present findings establish a strong scientific foundation for the future development and optimization of halloysite-supported mixed metal oxide materials for organo-sulfur removal from natural gas.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Song, C.; Ma, X. New design approaches ultra-clean diesel fuels by deep desulfurization and deep dearomatization. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2003, 41, 207–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speight, J.G. An Introduction to Petroleum Technology, Economics, and Politics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Anglerot, D.; Coq, B.; Trens, P. Methyl mercaptan and carbonyl sulfide traces removal through adsorption and catalysis on zeolites and layered double hydroxides. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2011, 397, 218–224. [Google Scholar]
- Castro, P.S.; Zuniga, G.M.; Holmes, W.; Buchireddy, P.R.; Gang, D.D.; Revellame, E.; Zappi, M.; Hernandez, R. Review of the adsorbents/catalysts for the removal of sulfur compounds from natural gas. Gas Sci. Eng. 2023, 115, 205004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jie, H.E.; Zhao, J.B.; Lan, Y.X. Adsorption and photocatalytic oxidation of dimethyl sulfide and ethyl mercaptan over layered K1-2xMnxTiNbO5 and K1-2xNixTiNbO5. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2009, 37, 485–488. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, J.; Hu, L.; Wang, J.; He, J. Adsorption behavior and mechanism of ethyl mercaptan in natural gas on Cu-modified hexaniobate nanotubes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 648, 159050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Su, W.; Xing, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Jia, H.; Yue, T. Progress of catalytic oxidation of VOCs by manganese-based catalysts. Fuel 2024, 366, 131305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trovarelli, A.; Fornasiero, P. Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials; Imperial College: London, UK, 2013; pp. 1–888. [Google Scholar]
- Biesinger, M.C. Advanced analysis of copper X-ray photoelectron spectra. Surf. Interface Anal. 2017, 49, 1325–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busca, G. Heterogeneous Catalytic Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 297–343. [Google Scholar]
- Trovarelli, A.; Llorca, J. Ceria catalysts at nanoscale: How do crystal shapes shape catalysis? ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 4716–4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mars, P.; Van Krevelen, D.W. Oxidations carried out by means of vanadium oxide catalysts. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1954, 3, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, C.T. The energetics of supported metal nanoparticles: Relationships to sintering rates and catalytic activity. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1712–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Post, J.E. Manganese oxide minerals: Crystal structures and economic and environmental significance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 3447–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özgür, Ü.; Alivov, Y.I.; Liu, C.; Teke, A.; Reshchikov, M.A.; Doğan, S.; Avrutin, V.C.S.J.; Cho, S.J.; Morkoç, A.H. A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 041301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, Y.H.; Mohamed, A.T.; Al-Qaradawi, S.Y. Exploring halloysite nanotubes as catalyst support for methane combustion: Influence of support pretreatment. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 201, 105956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joussein, E.; Petit, S.; Churchman, J.; Theng, B.; Righi, D.; Delvaux, B.J.C.M. Halloysite clay minerals-a review. Clay Miner. 2005, 40, 383–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, P.; Tan, D.; Annabi-Bergaya, F. Properties and applications of halloysite nanotubes: Recent research advances and future prospects. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 112, 75–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Churchman, G.J.; Pasbakhsh, P.; Lowe, D.J.; Theng, B.K.G. Unique but diverse: Some observations on the formation, structure and morphology of halloysite. Clay Miner. 2016, 51, 395–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massaro, M.; Colletti, C.G.; Lazzara, G.; Milioto, S.; Noto, R.; Riela, S. Halloysite nanotubes as support for metal-based catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 13276–13293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wachs, I.E. Recent conceptual advances in the catalysis science of mixed metal oxide catalytic materials. Catal. Today 2005, 100, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regalbuto, J. (Ed.) Catalyst Preparation: Science and Engineering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, L.; Bi, F.; Liu, N.; Zhang, X. Degradation of volatile organic pollutants over manganese-based catalysts by defect engineering: A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 362, 131934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, C.T. Electronic perturbations. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 597–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, C.T.; Peden, C.H. Oxygen vacancies and catalysis on ceria surfaces. Science 2005, 309, 713–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, A.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, B.; Wang, H.; Li, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Tu, W.; House, S.D.; Liu, W.; et al. Structural chemistry of oxides: Oxygen vacancy dynamics. J. Energy Chem. 2025, 114, 32–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Yates, J.T., Jr. Band bending in semiconductors: Chemical and physical consequences at surfaces and interfaces. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5520–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ping, Y.; Sundararaman, R.; Goddard, W.A., III. Solvation effects on the band edge positions of photocatalysts from first principles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 30499–30509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henrich, V.E.; Cox, P.A. The Surface Science of Metal Oxides; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, S.; Wang, L.W. Thermodynamic oxidation and reduction potentials of photocatalytic semiconductors in aqueous solution. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 3659–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, E.A. Band edge positions as a key parameter to a systematic design of heterogeneous photocatalyst. Eur. J. Chem. 2019, 10, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz Puigdollers, A.; Schlexer, P.; Tosoni, S.; Pacchioni, G. Increasing oxide reducibility: The role of metal/oxide interfaces in the formation of oxygen vacancies. Acs Catal. 2017, 7, 6493–6513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regalbuto, J.R. A scientific method to prepare supported metal catalysts. In Surface and Nanomolecular Catalysis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 175–208. [Google Scholar]
- Lvov, Y.; Abdullayev, E. Functional polymer-clay nanotube composites with sustained release of chemical agents. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1690–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sing, K.S. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosvenor, A.P.; Kobe, B.A.; McIntyre, N.S. Studies of the oxidation of iron by water vapour using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and QUASES™. Surf. Sci. 2004, 572, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bond, G.C.; Louis, C.; Thompson, D. Catalysis by Gold; World Scientific: Singapore, 2006; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
- Rouquerol, J.; Rouquerol, F.; Llewellyn, P.; Maurin, G.; Sing, K. Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids: Principles, Methodology and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Du, M.; Guo, B.; Jia, D. Newly emerging applications of halloysite nanotubes: A review. Polym. Int. 2010, 59, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villarroel-Rocha, J.; Gil, A. Modeling the temperature-programmed reduction of metal oxide catalysts by considering the particle-size distribution effect. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, G.; Chen, Y.; Zhuang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Yu, J. Oxygen vacancies in metal oxides: Recent progress towards advanced catalyst design. Sci. China Mater. 2020, 63, 2089–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Twigg, M.V. Catalyst Handbook; Routledge: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Madejová, J. FTIR techniques in clay mineral studies. Vib. Spectrosc. 2003, 31, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Grosvenor, A.P.; Lau, L.W.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Zuniga, G.; Antwi, S.; Percival, S.C.; Olatunji, O.; Maksym, C.; Holmes, W.E.; Prashanth, B.; Gang, D.; Emmanuel, R.; Zappi, M.E.; et al. Correction: Martinez-Zuniga et al. Methyl Mercaptan Removal from Methane Using Metal-Oxides and Aluminosilicate Materials. Catalysts 2025, 15, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suslick, K.S. Sonochemistry. Science 1990, 247, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suslick, K.S.; Price, G.J. Applications of ultrasound to materials chemistry. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1999, 29, 295–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winston, D.; Ariaratnam, S.T. Navigating Federal and State HDD Guidelines for Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Crossings. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 2022, 13, 04022008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Shen, L.; Luo, Q.; Zhou, L.; Yang, F.; He, Z.; Yang, W. Standard methods and related techniques for on-line detection of the total sulfur content in natural gas. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2018, 5, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, H.; Wu, L.W. The catalytic incineration of ethyl mercaptan over a MnO/Fe2O3 catalyst. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 1998, 33, 1119–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sehon, A.H.; Darwent, B.d.B. The thermal decomposition of mercaptans. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 4806–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartholomew, C.H.; Farrauto, R.J. Fundamentals of Industrial Catalytic Processes, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]









| Catalyst | Surface Area (m2/g) | Pore Volume (cm3/g) | Pore Size (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Halloysite (support) | 51.180 | 0.217 | 163.980 |
| Manganese | 10.833 | 0.091 | 278.592 |
| Copper | 9.651 | 0.076 | 267.470 |
| Zinc | 38.769 | 0.213 | 187.902 |
| Nickel | 40.218 | 0.201 | 165.525 |
| Base | 21.783 | 0.096 | 172.030 |
| Base + Pd | 20.566 | 0.149 | 246.514 |
| Wavenumber (cm−1) | Assignment | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 3690–3620 | O-H stretching | Inner surface hydroxyl groups (halloysite) |
| 3400 | O-H stretching | Inner surface hydroxyl groups (halloysite) |
| 1630 | H-O-H bending | Water bending vibration |
| 1100–1000 | Si-O stretching | Siloxane framework vibration |
| 910 | Al-OH bending | Inner hydroxyl groups |
| 790–750 | Si-O | Quartz/silica-related vibrations |
| 1400–1500 | CO32−/residual groups | Carbonate species and possible acetate/nitrate-derived surface groups |
| 2300–2350 | CO2 (adsorbed) | Adsorbed CO2 and possible residual carbonaceous species |
| Element | Halloysite | Mn Catalyst | Cu Catalyst | Zn Catalyst | Ni Catalyst | Base Catalyst | Base + Pd | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight % | Atomic % | Weight % | Atomic % | Weight % | Atomic % | Weight % | Atomic % | Weight % | Atomic % | Weight % | Atomic % | Weight % | Atomic % | |
| Al | 18.6 | 22.38 | 9.96 | 6.27 | 7.47 | 5.01 | 29.05 | 20.62 | 14.9 | 9.85 | 13.42 | 9.53 | 4.03 | 2.99 |
| Si | 17.59 | 21.48 | 14.68 | 8.87 | 8.19 | 5.28 | 14.73 | 10.05 | 14.83 | 9.41 | 15.67 | 10.69 | 4.15 | 2.97 |
| Mn | - | - | 1.84 | 0.57 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2.64 | 0.92 | 4.58 | 1.67 |
| Cu | - | - | - | - | 16.05 | 4.57 | - | - | - | - | 3.97 | 1.2 | 7.43 | 2.35 |
| Zn | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.77 | 0.52 | - | - | 2.78 | 0.81 | 5.82 | 1.79 |
| Ni | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3.53 | 1.07 | 2.33 | 0.76 | 4.31 | 1.47 |
| Pd | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10.47 | 1.97 |
| C | - | - | 21.28 | 30.1 | 24.88 | 37.47 | 9.1 | 14.52 | 14.33 | 21.28 | 13.04 | 20.82 | 25.37 | 42.37 |
| O | 63.81 | 56.14 | 48.36 | 51.33 | 39.33 | 44.47 | 45.35 | 54.29 | 52.4 | 58.38 | 46.15 | 55.27 | 33.84 | 42.43 |
| Na | - | - | 3.88 | 2.86 | 4.08 | 3.21 | - | - | 0.01 | 0.01 | - | - | - | - |
| Catalyst | Testing Conditions | Breakthrough | Improvement | Sulphur Capacity (q) | Surface Area cm3/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowrate (mL/min) | Pressure (psi) | Temp (°C) | (mins) | (%) | mg S/g | ||
| Manganese | 36 | 200 | 25 | 240 | 700% | 8.76 | 10.833 |
| Copper | 36 | 200 | 25 | 210 | 600% | 7.67 | 9.651 |
| Zinc | 36 | 200 | 25 | 205 | 583% | 7.48 | 38.769 |
| Nickel | 36 | 200 | 25 | 90 | 200% | 3.29 | 40.218 |
| Base | 36 | 200 | 25 | 300 | 900% | 10.95 | 21.783 |
| Base + Pd | 36 | 200 | 25 | 630 | 2000% | 23.00 | 20.566 |
| Halloysite | 36 | 200 | 25 | 30 | 0% | 1.10 | 51.180 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Antwi, S.; Holmes, W.; Cao, D.; Fortela, D.; Karsili, T.; Revellame, E.; Gallo, A.; Zappi, M.; Hernandez, R. Experimental Study on the Influence of Metal Oxide Catalyst Performance in Sulfur Compounds Removal from Natural Gas. Catalysts 2026, 16, 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16050473
Antwi S, Holmes W, Cao D, Fortela D, Karsili T, Revellame E, Gallo A, Zappi M, Hernandez R. Experimental Study on the Influence of Metal Oxide Catalyst Performance in Sulfur Compounds Removal from Natural Gas. Catalysts. 2026; 16(5):473. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16050473
Chicago/Turabian StyleAntwi, Samuel, William Holmes, Dongmei Cao, Dhan Fortela, Tolga Karsili, Emmanuel Revellame, August Gallo, Mark Zappi, and Rafael Hernandez. 2026. "Experimental Study on the Influence of Metal Oxide Catalyst Performance in Sulfur Compounds Removal from Natural Gas" Catalysts 16, no. 5: 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16050473
APA StyleAntwi, S., Holmes, W., Cao, D., Fortela, D., Karsili, T., Revellame, E., Gallo, A., Zappi, M., & Hernandez, R. (2026). Experimental Study on the Influence of Metal Oxide Catalyst Performance in Sulfur Compounds Removal from Natural Gas. Catalysts, 16(5), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16050473

