Tunable Catalytic Platforms: Metal–Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction Toward Value-Added Chemicals
Abstract
1. Introduction
- (1)
- (2)
- (3)
- (4)
- (1)
- Product selectivity: The similar reduction potentials for many CO2RR products, combined with the competing hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), make it difficult to achieve high selectivity toward a single desired product. This is particularly challenging for deep reduction products requiring multiple electron transfers.
- (2)
- Activity and overpotential: The high thermodynamic barrier for initial CO2 activation (forming CO2− at −1.9 V vs. SHE) necessitates substantial overpotentials, reducing energy efficiency. Even state-of-the-art catalysts often require 300–500 mV overpotential to achieve appreciable current densities.
- (3)
- Catalyst stability: Many catalysts undergo structural degradation under reducing conditions, leading to performance decay over time. This includes metal leaching, ligand decomposition, and active site agglomeration.
- (4)
- Mass transport limitations: At high current densities, CO2 supply to the catalyst surface becomes rate-limiting due to its limited solubility in aqueous electrolytes, necessitating advanced electrode designs such as gas diffusion electrodes. To address this, high-pressure CO2RR (conducted usually above 1 atm) is an effective strategy to bridge the gap between lab-scale CO2 electrolysis and industrial applications, as elevating the pressure significantly increases the solubility and surface concentration of CO2, boosting reaction kinetics, current density, and selectivity toward multi-carbon products (C2+) [28,29].
- (5)
- Electrolyte effects: The choice of electrolyte (pH, cation identity, buffer capacity) profoundly affects reaction kinetics and selectivity, adding another layer of complexity to system optimization [30,31,32]. Therefore, the development of electrocatalysts that simultaneously offer high activity, selectivity, and stability is paramount for achieving efficient and sustainable CO2 conversion.
2. CO2RR Reaction Mechanisms and Pathways
3. Design Strategies for MOF-Based Electrocatalysts
3.1. Molecular-Scale Active Site Engineering
3.1.1. Metal Node Engineering: From Single Atoms to Bimetallic Synergy
3.1.2. Ligand Engineering: Electronic Tuning and Microenvironment Design
3.2. Optimization of Electronic Structure and Charge Transport Enhancement
3.2.1. Molecular Design of Intrinsic Charge Transport Paths
3.2.2. Charge Transport Engineering in Heterogeneous Composite Interfaces
3.3. Crystal-Scale Morphology and Structure Modulation
3.3.1. Morphology and Dimensionality Engineering
3.3.2. Crystal Facet Engineering
3.3.3. Defect Engineering
3.4. Interfacial Synergistic Effects: From Functional Composites to Electronic Coupling
3.4.1. Tandem Catalysis and Interfacial Electronic Modulation
3.4.2. Inspiration from Band Engineering in Heterojunctions

4. Product-Oriented Catalysis of CO2RR Using MOFs
4.1. Carbon Monoxide (CO)
4.2. Methane (CH4)
4.3. Methanol (CH3OH)
4.4. Formic Acid (HCOOH)
4.5. Urea
4.6. Ethylene (C2H4)
4.7. Ethanol (C2H5OH)
4.8. Multi-Carbon (C2+) Products
5. Prospects and Outlook
- (1)
- Rational design integrated with dynamic mechanistic understanding.
- (2)
- Electrode and device engineering for industrial-level performance.
- (3)
- Precise pathway control through multifunctional integration.
- (4)
- Long-term operational stability enhancement.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liang, H.; Zhao, C.; Wang, R.; Fang, B.; Li, M.; Mo, R. Progress in reaction mechanisms and catalyst development of carbon dioxide methanation. J. CO2 Util. 2024, 84, 102845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kan, F.; Xu, H.; Tang, S.; Peñuelas, J.; Lian, X.; Roebroek, C.T.J.; Anniwaer, N.; Wang, K.; Piao, S. Diminished biophysical cooling benefits of global forestation under rising atmospheric CO2. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Gao, D.; Ge, Q.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shindell, D.; et al. Air quality improvement masks global cooling from CO2 reductions under China’s carbon neutrality policies for half a century. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boubaker, S.; Liu, Z.; Mu, Y.; Zhan, Y. Carbon dioxide emissions and environmental risks: Long term and short term. Risk Anal. 2025, 45, 523–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, S.; Montgomery, H. The need for radical climate interventions: Six years to secure humanity’s ‘liveable future’. Anaesthesia 2024, 79, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edelenbosch, O.Y.; Hof, A.F.; van den Berg, M.; de Boer, H.S.; Chen, H.-H.; Daioglou, V.; Dekker, M.M.; Doelman, J.C.; den Elzen, M.G.J.; Harmsen, M.; et al. Reducing sectoral hard-to-abate emissions to limit reliance on carbon dioxide removal. Nat. Clim. Change 2024, 14, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Wen, X.; Wang, X.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Low carbon optimal operation of integrated energy system based on carbon capture technology, LCA carbon emissions and ladder-type carbon trading. Appl. Energy 2022, 311, 118664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Chuang, E.; Huang, K.; Feng, G.; Li, X.; Cui, Y. Research on solar-air source heat pump coupled heating system based on heat network in severe cold regions of China. Energy Built Environ. 2024, 7, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Tanaka, K.; Ciais, P.; Penuelas, J.; Balkanski, Y.; Sardans, J.; Hauglustaine, D.; Liu, W.; Xing, X.; et al. Accelerating the energy transition towards photovoltaic and wind in China. Nature 2023, 619, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, J.; Li, P.; Lin, Y.; Du, H.; Liu, H.; Zhu, W.; Ren, H. Fight for carbon neutrality with state-of-the-art negative carbon emission technologies. Eco-Environ. Health 2022, 1, 259–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wei, X.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, H.; Dong, K.; Rui, Z.; Xu, H.; Yang, L.; et al. Carbon capture utilization and storage promotes poverty alleviation and sustainable development in China. Commun. Earth Environ. 2025, 6, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okatenko, V.; Elgazzar, A.; Loiudice, A.; Buonsanti, R.; Wang, H. Energy-efficient indirect (bi)carbonate electroreduction in a porous solid electrolyte reactor. Nat. Sustain. 2026, 9, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.-M.; Mun, J.; Yun, G.-N.; You, Y.-W.; Park, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; So, J.; Shin, H.; Kwon, J.; Kim, S.; et al. Rational synthesis of dual-atom catalysts for optimized thermochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 11617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duan, D.; Wu, D.; Shou, H.; Hu, C.; Hu, C.; Zhou, M.; Long, R.; Bi, Y.; Xiong, Y. Thermal Management Approach to Stabilization of Disordered Active Sites for Sabatier Reaction. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, 2409048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Li, Q.; Chen, X.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y.-F.; Zhang, T.-S.; Shen, H.-M.; Wang, Q.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Porous organic polymers with shiftable active Co(II) sites for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to C2H4. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2025, 362, 124765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Yuan, H.; Jia, Y.; Guo, L.; Wang, H.; Dai, W. Highly efficient photoreduction of CO2 to CO: Synergistic optimisation of progressive electron transfer via Fe2+ and oxygen vacancies. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 353, 128392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Ma, B.; Kuang, Y.; Rabiee, H.; Dorosti, F.; Nanjundan, A.K.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, H.; Ge, L. Flow-Through Hollow Fiber Gas Diffusion Electrodes with Morphology-Controlled In Situ Galvanic Grown Silver Catalysts for Enhanced CO Selectivity in CO2 Electroreduction. Energy Environ. Mater. 2026, e70205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Li, X.; Yan, S.; Wang, D.; Long, C.; Ying, Y.; An, P.; Guo, Z.; Li, Q.; Yang, C.; et al. Strain-optimized copper dual-atom sites for selective electroreduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eads0609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhao, S.; Guo, F.; Zhang, W.; Chen, M.; den Haan, R.; Xin, F.; Jiang, Y.; Jiang, M. Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Enzymatic Carbon Dioxide Conversion In Vitro. ACS Synth. Biol. 2025, 14, 4285–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wichmann, P.; Cox-Fermandois, A.; Küffner, A.; Linne, U.; Erb, T.; Nattermann, M. Engineering a Formic Acid Reductase. ACS Catal. 2025, 15, 20485–20495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.; Dong, Z.; Tan, Z.; Cai, Y.; Xie, S. Roles of carbon dioxide in the conversion of biomass or waste plastics. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 955, 176882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, J.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, D.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X. Recent progress in metal–organic framework-based materials for electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2025, 13, 21268–21291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J.; Zeng, S.; Feng, J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, X. CO2 Electroreduction in Ionic Liquids: A Review. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 961–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moriuchi, T.; Sakuramoto, T.; Matsutani, T.; Kawai, R.; Donaka, Y.; Tobisu, M.; Hirao, T. Oxovanadium(v)-catalyzed amination of carbon dioxide under ambient pressure for the synthesis of ureas. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 27121–27125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, R.; Wu, Q.; Luo, J.; Zu, X.; Zhu, S.; Sun, Y. Defective ultrathin two-dimensional materials for photo-/electrocatalytic CO2 reduction: Fundamentals and perspectives. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2025, 41, 100019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Dai, X.; He, M.; Song, Y.; Yang, J. A review of recent advances in carbon nitride photocatalysts for CO2 reduction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2026, 554, 217613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S.; Hussain, M.S.; Khan, M.K.; Kim, J. Innovations in catalysis towards efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2 to C1 chemicals. J. Energy Chem. 2025, 107, 622–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vos, R.E.; Sun, P.; Schauermann, D.; Javed, H.; Hanselman, S.R.; Fu, G.; Koper, M.T.M. CO2 electroreduction on Cu operates via an alternative chain growth mechanism to form C–C bonds at elevated temperature and pressure. Nat. Catal. 2025, 8, 1338–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Kuang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hung, W.-H.; Chiang, C.-Y.; Zhu, G.; Chen, G.; Wang, F.; Liang, P.; Dai, H. Electrochemical acetate production from high-pressure gaseous and liquid CO2. Nat. Catal. 2023, 6, 1151–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Wang, H.; Ji, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Zheng, T.; Xia, C. Electrifying the future: The advances and opportunities of electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction in acid. Sci. China Chem. 2023, 66, 3426–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khairurrozi, M.; Alharissa, E.Z.; Kadja, G.T.M. MXenes-based electrocatalysts for promoting CO2RR against HER. Fuel 2026, 414, 138398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mamaghani, A.H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, R.; Wu, Y.; Li, H.; Feng, M.; Chen, Z. Promises of MOF-Based and MOF-Derived Materials for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024, 14, 2402278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S.; Khan, M.K.; Kim, J. Revolutionary advancements in carbon dioxide valorization via metal-organic framework-based strategies. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2025, 15, 100405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wuttke, S. Toward the Nobel Prize: Dissecting Fundamental Principles and Applications of MOF and COF Materials. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, e71859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Li, W.; Tu, M. The evolution of metal—Organic frameworks for electronic devices and chemical sensors. Device 2026, 4, 101043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.-Y.; Wang, X.; Liang, Y.-Z.; Ma, Y.; Cai, B.-Z.; Zhou, Y.-B.; Han, Z.-G.; Zhao, X.-J. Regulation of the D-Band Center Through Ligand Engineering in Silver Cluster-Based MOFs Enhances Acidic CO2 Electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2026, 65, e18779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, W.; Qiao, T.; Zhou, K.; Peng, L.; Peng, Y.; Kuang, J.; Yang, X.; Cui, L.; Wu, B.; Xue, T.; et al. Precise ligand engineering in Cu8 nanoclusters promotes electrochemical CO2 reduction to C2+ products. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2026, 384, 126154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, L.; Seow, J.Y.R.; Skinner, W.S.; Wang, Z.U.; Jiang, H.-L. Metal–organic frameworks: Structures and functional applications. Mater. Today 2019, 27, 43–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, Y.; Wang, C.; Cai, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, T.; Ibragimov, A.B.; Gao, J. Hierarchically structured MOF aerogels with tandem pores for high-performance CO2 capture and separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 515, 163538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Husile, A.; Wang, Z.; Guan, J. Bimetallic effects in carbon dioxide electroreduction. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16, 5413–5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junaid, M.; Alomar, T.S.; Nadeem, M.; AlMasoud, N.; Al-wallan, A.A.; El-Bahy, Z.M.; Asif, H.M. Al-Based Porphyrin Metal-Organic Framework for the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formic Acid. ChemistrySelect 2025, 10, e00408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Sun, W.-Y. Rational design of organic ligands for metal–organic frameworks as electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. Chem. Commun. 2024, 60, 8824–8839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dang, S.; Zhu, Q.-L.; Xu, Q. Nanomaterials derived from metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 3, 17075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.-F.; Chen, L.; Pang, H.; Kaskel, S.; Xu, Q. MOF-derived electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction, oxygen evolution and hydrogen evolution reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 1414–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elhenawy, S.E.; Khraisheh, M.; AlMomani, F.; Walker, G. Metal-Organic Frameworks as a Platform for CO2 Capture and Chemical Processes: Adsorption, Membrane Separation, Catalytic-Conversion, and Electrochemical Reduction of CO2. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, L.; Li, R.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, K.; Pan, J. MOF-derived Carbon-Based Materials for Energy-Related Applications. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2413658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Bai, X.; Xu, X.; Bai, X.; Husile, A.; Zhang, S.; Qi, L.; Guan, J. Advances and challenges in the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Chem. Sci. 2024, 15, 7870–7907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Z.; Zhang, M.; Long, Y.; Lei, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.-P.; Zhang, W.; Apfel, U.-P.; Cao, R. Improving Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction over Iron Tetraphenylporphyrin with Triethanolamine as a CO2 Shuttle. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202500154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.; Liang, X.; Liu, L.; Hu, F.; Liu, Y.; Jin, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, T.; Wang, P.; Ding, J.; et al. Integrative Ni1–Px Catalytic Pairs for Low-Concentration CO2 Electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202518003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, L.; Qi, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, H.; Liu, R.; Zhang, B. Rational design of copper alloy electrocatalysts for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Energy Chem. 2025, 110, 88–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Ahmadi, Y.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, K.-H. Advances in morphological and interfacial tuning of metal oxides for electrochemical CO2 conversion. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2026, 155, 101522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Xiang, X.; Zhou, L.; Fan, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, C.; Fan, W.; Han, M.; Pu, Z.; et al. Catalyst design strategies for highly efficient CO2 electroreduction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2025, 536, 216650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Yang, S.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Dong, F.; Lei, H.; Yang, Y.; Chen, N.; Omanovic, S.; Regier, T.; et al. Steering CO2 Electroreduction Pathway via Tuning Microenvironment of Cobalt Center in Molecular Catalysts. ACS Nano 2025, 19, 32507–32517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yin, Y.; Sun, Z.; Wang, M.; Liao, B.; Cao, S.; Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Wei, S.; Wei, B.; et al. Rational Design of MXene-Supported Single-Atom Catalysts for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction with Tunable Activity and Product Selectivity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2026, 14, 1732–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Ji, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Chen, Z.; Tang, J.; Hong, Y.; Li, X.; Zheng, T.; Jiang, Q.; et al. Applications of Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Derivatives in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 15, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewis, D.; Arsalan, M.; Khaled, M.; Pant, D.; Ba-Abbad, M.M.; Amhamed, A.; El-Naas, M.H. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 into formate/formic acid: A review of cell design and operation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 316, 123811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitopi, S.; Bertheussen, E.; Scott, S.B.; Liu, X.; Engstfeld, A.K.; Horch, S.; Seger, B.; Stephens, I.E.L.; Chan, K.; Hahn, C.; et al. Progress and Perspectives of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on Copper in Aqueous Electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 7610–7672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Wang, T.; Liang, J.; Li, Q.; Sun, S. Cu-based nanocatalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Nano Today 2018, 21, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, J.; Yu, J.; Chen, Q.; Peng, L. Recent Progress on Copper-Based Bimetallic Heterojunction Catalysts for CO2 Electrocatalysis: Unlocking the Mystery of Product Selectivity. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2309865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, W.; Zhang, J.; Wu, J. Recent Advances in Reactions Involving Carbon Dioxide Radical Anion. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 15991–16011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.; Zhao, R.; Li, L.; Cui, C. Hydrated Electrons Bypass the −1.9 V Activation Barrier in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 48087–48094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kortlever, R.; Shen, J.; Schouten, K.J.P.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; Koper, M.T.M. Catalysts and Reaction Pathways for the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4073–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, Y.; Xu, S.; Bu, H.; Yan, W.; Zheng, Z.; Ren, D.; Ma, M. Unraveling the Impact of Common-Ion Effect on Acidic CO2 Electroreduction via Exploring Local pH Variation. ACS Catal. 2025, 15, 12114–12122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, K.-K.; Wu, J.-D.; Wu, T.-R.; Zheng, A.-N.; Fang, J.-H.; Zhou, J.-Z.; Sun, L.; Wu, D.-Y.; Mao, B.-W.; Yan, J.-W. Mechanistic Insights into the Roles of Electrolyte Additives in Enhancing CO2 Electroreduction Efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026, 148, 2139–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Peng, X.; Li, Z.; Yang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, J.; Lei, L.; Hou, Y. Rational Modulation of Interface Microenvironment and Design of the Flow Electrolyzer for COx Electroreduction to Alcohol. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2409106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chernyshova, I.V.; Somasundaran, P.; Ponnurangam, S. On the origin of the elusive first intermediate of CO2 electroreduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E9261–E9270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, S.-Q.; Gao, S.-T.; Shi, J.-L.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, L.-B. Developing micro-kinetic model for electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide on copper electrode. J. Catal. 2021, 393, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dey, S.; Masero, F.; Brack, E.; Fontecave, M.; Mougel, V. Electrocatalytic metal hydride generation using CPET mediators. Nature 2022, 607, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, D.-J.; Xiang, S.-Q.; Gao, S.-T.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, L.-B.; Tian, Z.-Q. Kinetic Understanding of Catalytic Selectivity and Product Distribution of Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction Reaction. JACS Au 2023, 3, 905–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Rabiee, H.; Li, M.; Ma, B.; Kuang, Y.; Dorosti, F.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, H.; Ge, L. Engineering Flow-Through Hollow Fiber Gas-Diffusion Electrodes for Unlocking High-Rate Gas-Phase Electrochemical Conversion. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2420391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Xiao, T.; Zhu, K.; Zhang, W.; Yin, Z.; Dong, A.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, D.; Li, W. Industry-Level Electrocatalytic CO2 to CO Enabled by 2D Mesoporous Ni Single Atom Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202416629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, W.; Han, J.; Dong, T.; Jin, G.; Li, H.; Lv, Q.; Kutchin, A.V.; Lai, J.; et al. Small PdCx interstitial compound for efficient acidic CO2 electroreduction to formic acid. Nat. Commun. 2025, 17, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, H.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Park, S.; Lee, Y.; Lee, G.; Jeon, H.S.; Han, M.H.; Jin, S.; Lee, H.-W.; et al. Selective Electrosynthesis of Methanol from CO2 Over Cu/Cu2P2O7 Via the Formate Pathway. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2501021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, M.; Huang, Z.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Feng, X.; Ma, J.; Dai, L.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, L. Thousand-hour salt precipitation-free CO2-to-ethylene electrosynthesis at high current densities. Nat. Commun. 2025, 17, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Zhang, G.; Luo, R.; Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhang, M.; Chang, X.; Zhao, Z.-J.; Wang, T.; Gong, J. Selective CO2 reduction to acetate via controlled sp2/sp3 carbon hybridization. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 10506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.; Xu, J.; Wu, M.; Yang, R.; Duan, J.; Yang, S.; Liu, Y.; Gao, J.; Pang, Y.; Li, H.; et al. Pre-Protonation Reaction Pathway for CO2 Electrolysis to n-Propanol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026, 148, 1901–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.; Sun, C.; Han, G.; Qian, Z.; Gu, Y.; Ye, N.; Lin, Z.; Huang, Q.; Liu, F.; Wei, C.; et al. Neutral Electrosynthesis of Methane from Diluted CO2 on Dense Cu Sites Embedded Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026, 148, 3327–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, K.; Nie, X.; Wang, H.; Chen, S.; Quan, X.; Yu, H.; Choi, W.; Zhang, G.; Kim, B.; Chen, J.G. Selective electroreduction of CO2 to acetone by single copper atoms anchored on N-doped porous carbon. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vafaie, M.; Dorakhan, R.; Morteza Najarian, A.; Teimouri, Z.; Pofelski, A.; Barati, N.; Chou, C.-H.; Chang, Y.-C.; Hung, S.-F.; Sun, Q.; et al. Direct Electrosynthesis of C3+ Hydrocarbons from CO2 via Size-Controlled Nickel Nanoislands on a Carbon Support. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 40454–40465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Hu, S.; Liu, B. Steering electroreduction of carbon dioxide to valuable C3+ products. Sci. China Mater. 2024, 67, 1780–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Li, X.; Sun, Y.; Xie, Y. Rational design of electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction for a zero-carbon network. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 1234–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, D.; Mao, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Y. Modulating microenvironments to enhance CO2 electroreduction performance. eScience 2023, 3, 100119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Z.; Wang, T.; Liu, H.; Jia, X.; Zhang, D.; Wei, L.; Xu, J.; Li, H. Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on SnO: Insights into C1 Product Dynamic Distribution and Reaction Mechanisms. ACS Catal. 2025, 15, 3173–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Cai, Y.; Xie, J.; Hou, D.; Yu, L.; Deng, D. Selectivity control in CO2 hydrogenation to one-carbon products. Chem 2024, 10, 1084–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, W.; He, X.; Wang, W.; Xie, S.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 and CO to multi-carbon compounds over Cu-based catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 12897–12914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, C.; Dattila, F.; Rettenmaier, C.; Bergmann, A.; Kühl, S.; García-Muelas, R.; López, N.; Cuenya, B.R. Revealing the CO Coverage-Driven C-C Coupling Mechanism for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on Cu2O Nanocubes via Operando Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 7694–7701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Fan, W.; Li, P.; Wang, C.; Li, M.; Han, Z.; Chen, Q.; Jiao, X. Spatial confinement boosts C–C coupling in brushed Cu/Ag@CuO NWs for CO2 electroreduction into C2H4. Chem. Commun. 2025, 61, 11653–11656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Zhao, J.; Ye, J.; Zhou, D.; Di, T.; Zhang, J. Modulating the d-band center of NNU-55(Fe) for enhanced CO2 adsorption and photocatalytic activity. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2025, 41, 100074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Shen, J.; Gu, T.; Yang, Y.; Ji, S.; Zhu, M.; Liu, J. Raising the Redox Potential in a Quinone-Based Positive Organic Cathode via Space Charge Modulation. ACS Energy Lett. 2025, 10, 1107–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikdar, N.; Junqueira, J.R.C.; Dieckhöfer, S.; Quast, T.; Braun, M.; Song, Y.; Aiyappa, H.B.; Seisel, S.; Weidner, J.; Öhl, D.; et al. A Metal–Organic Framework derived CuxOyCz Catalyst for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction and Impact of Local pH Change. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 23427–23434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, J.; Li, W.; Li, J.; Zhu, Z.; Dong, A.; Lv, H.; Li, P.; Wang, B. A Triptycene-Based 2D MOF with Vertically Extended Structure for Improving the Electrocatalytic Performance of CO2 to Methane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, H.-L.; Liao, P.-Q.; Chen, X.-M. Precise Engineering of Multimetal Sites in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Efficient and Selective Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to C2 and Urea Products. Acc. Chem. Res. 2025, 58, 3530–3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, L.; Liu, Z.; Gao, G.; Chen, C.; Xue, Y.; Zhao, J.; Lei, Q.; Jin, M.; Zhu, C.; Han, Y.; et al. Enhanced CO2 Electroreduction Selectivity toward Ethylene on Pyrazolate-Stabilized Asymmetric Ni–Cu Hybrid Sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 26444–26451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, S.; Xiong, Y.-Y.; Chen, C.-X.; Dai, Q.-H.; Chen, Y.-X.; Geng, W.; Liang, Z.-Y.; Ruan, W.-L.; Wei, Z.-W.; Barboiu, M.; et al. Achieving Diverse CO2 Conversions through On-Demand Installation of Multivariate Catalytic Sites into One Prototypical Metal–Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 19996–20007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, S.-C.; Li, Y.-P.; Wang, J.-W.; Xing, C.-C.; Liu, Z.-Y.; Yuan, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhai, Q.-G. Local-Global Synergistic Pore Space Partition in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Boosting CO2 Capture and Conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 39379–39390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kornienko, N.; Zhao, Y.; Kley, C.S.; Zhu, C.; Kim, D.; Lin, S.; Chang, C.J.; Yaghi, O.M.; Yang, P. Metal–Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14129–14135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, J.-D.; Si, D.-H.; Xie, R.; Yin, Q.; Zhang, M.-D.; Wu, Q.; Chai, G.-L.; Huang, Y.-B.; Cao, R. Conductive Two-Dimensional Phthalocyanine-based Metal–Organic Framework Nanosheets for Efficient Electroreduction of CO2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 17108–17114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, G.; Ren, B.; Wang, X.; Luo, D.; Dou, H.; Zheng, Y.; Gao, R.; Gostick, J.; Yu, A.; Chen, Z. Continuous CO2 electrolysis using a CO2 exsolution-induced flow cell. Nat. Energy 2022, 7, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Shen, K.; Yuan, Z.; Chen, Y.; Lan, Y.-Q. Implanting Polypyrrole in Metal-Porphyrin MOFs: Enhanced Electrocatalytic Performance for CO2RR. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 54959–54966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Jiang, D.; Fu, Y.; Zheng Chen, G.; Bi, S.; Ding, X.; He, J.; Han, B.-H.; Xu, Q.; Zeng, G. Modulating Skeletons of Covalent Organic Framework for High-Efficiency Gold Recovery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202317015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xu, H.; Li, H.; Jiao, J.; Wen, X.; Meng, Q.; Lan, X. Tuning charge-carrier transport in isostructural covalent organic frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Green Chem. 2025, 27, 7631–7641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, D.-H.; Bushuyev, O.S.; Li, J.; De Luna, P.; Seifitokaldani, A.; Dinh, C.-T.; García de Arquer, F.P.; Wang, Y.; Liang, Z.; Proppe, A.H.; et al. Metal–Organic Frameworks Mediate Cu Coordination for Selective CO2 Electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11378–11386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shekhawat, A.; Das, D.; Zerdoumi, R.; Mahbub, M.A.A.; Eid, B.; Chandra, S.; Seisel, S.; Schuhmann, W. Defect-Induced Selectivity Modulation Using Copper Triazole Molecular Frameworks for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2506172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Fei, M.; Xie, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhao, P.; Fei, J. Modulation of metal centers of MOF in-situ grown on lignin-derived carbon to enhance adsorption capacity and electrochemical sensing performance for bisphenol A. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 499, 156279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.; Wang, J.; Yang, G.; Chen, J.; Li, R.; Fan, X.; Li, Z. Tailoring Lithium-Ion Coordination in Metal–Organic Frameworks via d-Orbital Control for Fast Ion Conduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026, 148, 2481–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, Z.; Luo, J.; Li, W.; Mirica, K.A. Hierarchical Tuning of the Performance of Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction Using Conductive Two-Dimensional Metallophthalocyanine Based Metal–Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 21656–21669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Zheng, Q.; Sun, T.; Zhang, X. Analysis of heat conducting enhancement measures on the composite for hydrogen storage by incorporation of activated carbon with MOFs. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 3994–4005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, F.; Fu, L.; Wu, Q.; Ding, C.; Yu, L.; Zhou, W.; Cao, F.; Liu, H.; Xu, J. Single-ion conductor covalently grafted onto MOFs to realize solid polymer electrolyte tripartite conducting channels in lithium metal batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 525, 170705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.-H.; Wu, X.-Y.; Lu, J.-F.; Xu, H.; Hou, S.-L.; Zhao, J.; Liu, S.-J.; Wen, H.-R. MXene-Regulated Indium-Based Metal–Organic Framework Material for Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 into Pure Formic Acid Aqueous Solution. Inorg. Chem. 2025, 64, 8261–8269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, J.H.; Ma, J.; Lee, C.; Lim, J.W.; Kim, Y.; Jang, H.Y.; Kim, J.; Seo, M.-G.; Choi, Y.; Jang, Y.J.; et al. Crystallographically vacancy-induced MOF nanosheet as rational single-atom support for accelerating CO2 electroreduction to CO. Carbon Energy 2024, 6, e510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koley, P.; Shit, S.C.; Yoshida, T.; Jampaiah, D.; Ariga-Miwa, H.; Uruga, T.; Kaishyop, J.; Hosseinnejad, T.; Periasamy, S.; Gudi, R.D.; et al. Metal organic framework derived In2O3/ZrO2 heterojunctions with interfacial oxygen vacancies for highly selective CO2-to-methanol hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 8903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, T.; Liu, H.; Han, X.; Biset-Peiró, M.; Yang, Y.; Imaz, I.; Maspoch, D.; Yang, B.; Morante, J.R.; Arbiol, J. Improvement of carbon dioxide electroreduction by crystal surface modification of ZIF-8. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 5234–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Song, Y.; Geng, S.; Peng, Z.; Yu, J.; Liu, F.; Wang, Y.; Xi, S.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Simultaneous Defect and Size Control of Metal–Organic Framework Nanostructures for Highly Efficient Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction to Multicarbon Products. ACS Mater. Lett. 2023, 5, 2121–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, F.-Y.; Meng, Y.-Z.; Sun, H.; Jiao, P.; Hou, M.-C.; Duan, L.-H.; Fang, Z.; Wang, L.-Q.; Li, L.-Y.; Yang, Z.-W.; et al. Nanoparticle-Single-Atom Tandem Catalyst within a Metal–Organic Framework for Efficient Ethylene Electrosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026, 148, 7312–7321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabir, M.; Sayed, M.; Riaz, I.; Qiu, G.; Tahir, M.; Alibrahim, K.A.; Wang, W. Ni-MOF/g-C3N4 S-Scheme Heterojunction for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Materials 2025, 18, 3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, B.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Gu, J.; Zhang, C. Alternating Magnetic Field Induced Ultra-Active Cu Sites in Trimetal-Organic Frameworks for Low-Overpotential CO2 Electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202514255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, H.; Ghorbani-Asl, M.; Ly, K.H.; Zhang, J.; Ge, J.; Wang, M.; Liao, Z.; Makarov, D.; Zschech, E.; Brunner, E.; et al. Synergistic electroreduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide on bimetallic layered conjugated metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, P.; Ai, J.; Hao, J.; Shaowei, Y.; Shen, H.; Zhang, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, H. Cu–Mg Dual Single-Atom Catalysts with CO Spillover for Efficient CO2 Electroreduction to CH4. Angew. Chem. 2025, 137, e202516184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, S.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, X.; Xue, C.; Dong, M.; Deng, T.; Cheng, H.; Yao, T.; Jiao, J.; Xia, Z.; et al. Copper–Carbon Bond Metal–Organic Frameworks for Highly Efficient and Stable CO2 Electrochemical Methanation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 22580–22588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Z.; Han, G.; Tan, Y.; Ye, N.; Wang, S.; Lin, Z.; Huang, Q.; Gu, Y.; Guo, H.; Liu, F.; et al. σ-π dative bond stabilizing copper active site drives CO2 electrocatalysis to hydrocarbon. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 11265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Cheng, J.; Yang, X.; Xu, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhou, J. MOF-derived Cu@Cu2O heterogeneous electrocatalyst with moderate intermediates adsorption for highly selective reduction of CO2 to methanol. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 134171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghatak, A.; Shanker, G.S.; Pearlmutter, Y.; Fryder, A.; Shimoni, R.; Hod, I. Dual Molecular Catalyst-Based Tandem That Enables Electrocatalytic CO2−Formaldehyde−Methanol Cascade Conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 20329–20337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Feng, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y. Trinuclear Cu(I) Metal–Organic Framework Inspires the Activation of *CO2 Via Electrostatic Tension to Boost the Electrochemical Conversion of CO2-to-Methanol. Small 2025, 21, e05892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.-Y.; Huang, J.-R.; Zhao, Z.-H.; Zhu, H.-L.; Liao, P.-Q.; Chen, X.-M. Low-Coordination Indium Single-Atom Sites Anchored on a Metal-Organic Framework Single-Layer Boosts Electroreduction of CO2 Into Formic Acid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202511132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamagni, P.; Miola, M.; Catalano, J.; Hvid, M.S.; Mamakhel, M.A.H.; Christensen, M.; Madsen, M.R.; Jeppesen, H.S.; Hu, X.-M.; Daasbjerg, K.; et al. Restructuring Metal–Organic Frameworks to Nanoscale Bismuth Electrocatalysts for Highly Active and Selective CO2 Reduction to Formate. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1910408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, X.-F.; Huang, J.-R.; Yu, C.; Chen, X.-M.; Liao, P.-Q. Highly Efficient Electrosynthesis of Urea from CO2 and Nitrate by a Metal–Organic Framework with Dual Active Sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202410625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.; Chen, X.; Yuan, J.; Sheng, G.; Deng, W.-Q.; Wu, H. Concentration-Adaptive Electrocatalytic Urea Synthesis from CO2 and Nitrate via Porphyrin and Metalloporphyrin MOFs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202513441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, M.; Huang, L.; Zhang, F.; Li, J.; Kou, J.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, P.; Dong, Z.; Zhang, Z. Copper-Silver Bimetallic Metal-Covalent Organic Frameworks with Unique Intermediate Interlayer Transfer Effects for Enhanced Electrocatalytic CO2 to Ethylene Conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2026, 65, e20496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, T.; Wang, P.; Sun, W.-Y. Single-Site Metal–Organic Framework and Copper Foil Tandem Catalyst for Highly Selective CO2 Electroreduction to C2H4. Small 2023, 19, 2206070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, D.-H.; Shekhah, O.; Ozden, A.; McCallum, C.; Li, F.; Wang, X.; Lum, Y.; Lee, T.; Li, J.; Wicks, J.; et al. High-Rate and Selective CO2 Electrolysis to Ethylene via Metal–Organic-Framework-Augmented CO2 Availability. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2207088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.-H.; Huang, J.-R.; Liao, P.-Q.; Chen, X.-M. Highly Efficient Electroreduction of CO2 to Ethanol via Asymmetric C–C Coupling by a Metal–Organic Framework with Heterodimetal Dual Sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 26783–26790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, B.; Huang, D.; Huang, R.-K.; He, X.-L.; Luo, Y.; Xiang, Y.-L.; Jiang, L.-B.; Dong, M.; Li, S.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Metal–Organic Framework Supported Low-Nuclearity Cluster Catalysts for Highly Selective Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction to Ethanol. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202409270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, J.; Delmo, E.P.; Chen, W.; Sun, Z.; Wan, D.H.C.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, T.; Huang, H.; et al. Metal-Organic Framework-Derived Partially Oxidized Cu Electrocatalysts for Efficient CO2 Reduction Reaction Toward C2+ Products. Carbon Energy 2025, 7, e70019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Wang, M.; Ye, J.; Liu, L.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Huang, X. Highly Selective CO2 Electroreduction to C2+ Products over Cu2O-Decorated 2D Metal–Organic Frameworks with Rich Heterogeneous Interfaces. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 1474–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Reaction | E0 vs. SHE(V) |
|---|---|
| Half-electrochemical thermodynamic reactions | Electrode potentials (V vs. SHE) under standard conditions |
| CO2 (g) + e− → CO2− (aq) | −1.900 |
| CO2 (g) +2 H+ + 2 e− → HCOOH (l) | −0.250 |
| 2CO2 (g) + 2 H+ + 2 e− → H2C2O4 (aq) | −0.500 |
| CO2 (g) +2 H2O (l) + 2 e− → HCOO-(aq) + OH− | −1.078 |
| 2 CO2 (g) + 2 e− → C2O42− (aq) | −0.590 |
| CO2 (g) + 2 H+ + 2 e− → CO (g) + H2O (l) | −0.106 |
| CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (l) + 2 e− → CO (g) + 2 OH− | −0.934 |
| CO2 (g) + 4 H + + 4 e− → C (s) + 2 H2O (l) | 0.210 |
| CO2 (g) + 2 H2O (l) + 4 e− → C (s) + 4 OH− | −0.627 |
| CO2 (g) + 3 H2O (l) + 4 e− → CH2O (l) + 4 OH− | −0.898 |
| CO2 (g) + 6 H + + 6 e− → CH3OH (l) + H2O (l) | 0.016 |
| CO2 (g) + 5 H2O (l) + 6 e− → CH3OH (l) + 6 OH− | −0.812 |
| CO2 (g) + 8 H+ + 8 e− → CH4 (g) + 2 H2O (l) | 0.169 |
| CO2 (g) + 6 H2O (l) + 8 e− → CH4 (g) + 8 OH− | −0.659 |
| 2 CO2 (g) + 12 H+ + 12 e− → CH2CH2 (g) + 4 H2O (l) | 0.064 |
| 2 CO2 (g) + 12 H+ + 12 e− → CH3CH2OH (l) + 3 H2O (l) | 0.084 |
| 2 CO2 (g) + 9 H2O (l) + 12 e− → CH3CH2OH (l) + 12 OH− | −0.744 |
| Representative Catalyst | Core Design Strategy | Key Performance (Faradaic Efficiency, FE) | Target Product | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-ZnMg MOF | Magnetic field coupling and trimetallic synergy; magnetic dilution to lower overpotential | ~95% FE @ −0.2 V vs. RHE | CO | [116] |
| PcCu-O8-Zn | Bimetallic site division of labor (ZnO4 for CO2 reduction, CuN4 for proton transfer); tunable syngas ratio | 88% FE | CO/H2 | [117] |
| NiPc-NiO4 | Constructing intrinsically conductive 2D π-conjugated framework; optimizing charge transfer and *COOH formation barrier | 98.4% FE @ −0.85 V vs. RHE | CO | [97] |
| CuN2-MgN2 | Dual-site tandem catalysis; CO generation on Mg sites and spillover to Cu sites for hydrogenation | 78.3% FE @ −1.1 V vs. RHE | CH4 | [118] |
| Cu-TEPT | Ligand engineering; strong σ-bond from alkynyl groups stabilizes Cu+ active sites | 83.6% FE @ −1.5 V vs. RHE | CH4 | [119] |
| OMe-PhCu MOP | σ-π dative bonding stabilizes Cuδ+ sites; suitable for acidic environments | 68.8% FE (pH = 3) | CH4 | [120] |
| Cu@Cu2O/NC | MOF-derived core–shell heterojunction; abundant Cu0/Cu+ interfaces with moderate *CO adsorption | 45% FE @ −0.7 V vs. RHE | CH3OH | [121] |
| CoPc/Hemin@Zr-BTB | Dual-molecular tandem catalysis; non-CO pathway (CO2 → formaldehyde → methanol) | 18% FE (flow cell) | CH3OH | [122] |
| CuTz-1-300 | Ionic framework creates an electrostatic tension field to enhance CO2 adsorption; low-temperature activation preserves Cu+ sites and conductivity | 56.4% FE @ −0.97 V vs. RHE | CH3OH | [123] |
| Zr-BTB-In(monolayer) | Low-coordination In single atom enables dual *HCOO intermediate synergistic pathway | 95.7% FE @ −1.8 V vs. RHE (pH = 1.67) | HCOOH | [124] |
| Bi(btb)-derived | MOF precatalyst in situ reconstructs into highly dispersed Bi nanoparticles/carbon composite | 95% FE @ −0.97 V vs. RHE | HCOO− | [125] |
| PcNi–Fe–O 2D c-MOF | Dual active sites (FeO4 reduces NO3−, NiPc activates CO2 and couples); synergy lowers C–N bond formation barrier | 54.1% FE @ −0.6 V vs. RHE | Urea | [126] |
| PMOF/Cu-PMOF | Concentration-adaptive design; porphyrin/metalloporphyrin centers match coupling mechanisms at different NO3− concentrations | Up to 52.7% FE | Urea | [127] |
| Ag0.5Cu0.5-CTC-TAPT | Alternating heterometallic layers enable directional CO migration from Ag to Cu sites, enriching *CO for dimerization | 51.5% FE @ −1.774 V vs. RHE | C2H4 | [128] |
| Cu-MOF-CF | MOF layer acts as CO generator; modulates Cu foil facets and completely suppresses CH4 | 48.6% FE @ −1.11 V vs. RHE | C2H4 | [129] |
| MOF/GDE (HKUST-1) | MOF functional layer enriches local CO2 concentration at the electrode, overcoming mass-transfer limitations | 49% FE @ 1 A cm−2 (flow cell) | C2H4 | [130] |
| CuSn-HAB | Sn···Cu heterobimetallic sites guide asymmetric C–C coupling (CO + OCH2), preserving the C–O bond | 56% FE @ −0.57 V vs. RHE | C2H5OH | [131] |
| Cu-MOF-20 (LNCCs) | Electrochemical reconstruction of MOF precursor yields confined Cu low-nuclearity clusters (2–10 atoms), enhancing C–C coupling | 82.5% FE @ −1.0 V vs. RHE | C2H5OH | [132] |
| Cux-Act (Cu-BDC derived) | Combined thermal annealing and electrochemical activation stabilizes partially oxidized Cuδ+ species, promoting *CO dimerization | 78% total C2+ FE @ −1.06 V vs. RHE | C2+ | [133] |
| Cu2O@Cu-BDC | Rich heterointerfaces between MOF nanosheets and Cu2O nanoparticles synergistically stabilize intermediates and active sites | 72.1% total C2+ FE @ −1.19 V vs. RHE (H-cell) | C2+ | [134] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Fu, H.; Li, H.; Li, M.; Yin, S.; Liu, B.; Duan, Y. Tunable Catalytic Platforms: Metal–Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction Toward Value-Added Chemicals. Catalysts 2026, 16, 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16040303
Fu H, Li H, Li M, Yin S, Liu B, Duan Y. Tunable Catalytic Platforms: Metal–Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction Toward Value-Added Chemicals. Catalysts. 2026; 16(4):303. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16040303
Chicago/Turabian StyleFu, Haifeng, Huaqiang Li, Ming Li, Shupeng Yin, Bin Liu, and Youchun Duan. 2026. "Tunable Catalytic Platforms: Metal–Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction Toward Value-Added Chemicals" Catalysts 16, no. 4: 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16040303
APA StyleFu, H., Li, H., Li, M., Yin, S., Liu, B., & Duan, Y. (2026). Tunable Catalytic Platforms: Metal–Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction Toward Value-Added Chemicals. Catalysts, 16(4), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16040303

