Next Article in Journal
Tailoring TiO2/TiN Bi-Layer Interfaces via Nitrogen Diffusion and Gold Functionalization for Advanced Photocatalysis
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Synthesis Methods of CdS/TiO2 Photocatalysts for Enhanced Hydrogen Production Under Visible Light
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Simple Fabrication of Tourmaline-Supported Ni-NiAl2O4 Nanocomposites for Enhanced Methane Dry Reforming Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanistic Behavior of Basicity of Bimetallic Ni/ZrO2 Mixed Oxides for Stable Oxythermal Reforming of CH4 with CO2

by
Hyuk Jong Bong
1,
Nagireddy Gari Subba Reddy
1,* and
A. Geetha Bhavani
2,*
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Engineering Research Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Chemistry, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Delhi-NCR Campus, Delhi-Meerut Road, Modinagar, Ghaziabad 201204, Uttar Pradesh, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2025, 15(8), 700; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15080700
Submission received: 30 May 2025 / Revised: 10 July 2025 / Accepted: 14 July 2025 / Published: 22 July 2025

Abstract

The mixed oxides of Ni/ZrO2, Ni-Ca/ZrO2, Ni-Ba/ZrO2, and Ni-Ba-Ca/ZrO2 were prepared using the co-precipitation method at a pH of precisely 8.3. The catalytic mixed oxides of Ni/ZrO2, Ni-Ca/ZrO2, Ni-Ba/ZrO2, and Ni-Ba-Ca/ZrO2 were characterized using x-ray diffraction XRD, Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and metal dispersion for the screening of phase purity, surface area, and morphology. The mixed oxides are subjected to CO2-TPD to quantify the basicity of every composition. The mixed oxide catalysts of Ni/ZrO2, Ni-Ca/ZrO2, Ni-Ba/ZrO2, and Ni-Ba-Ca/ZrO2 were screened for oxythermal reforming of CH4 with CO2 in a fixed bed tubular reactor at 800 °C. Among all catalysts, the Ba- and Ca- loaded Ni-Ba-Ca/ZrO2 showed high conversion by the decomposition of methane and CO2 disproportionation throughout the time on stream of 29 h. The high activity with stability led to less coke formation over Ni-Ba-Ca/ZrO2 over the surface. The stable syngas production with an active catalyst bed contributed to the improved bimetallic synergy. The high surface basicity of Ni-Ba-Ca/ZrO2 may keep actively gasifying the formed soot and allow for further stable reforming reactions.

1. Introduction

Environmental concerns like the effect of greenhouse gases have prompted a focus on plentiful naturally available resources like methane. Thus, green catalytic technologies capable of converting methane and carbon dioxide, two main greenhouse gas contributors, are crucial to avoid their significant release into the atmosphere. The targeted CO2 is used as one of the reactants (which may free resources from industrial flue gases), and another reactant CH4, which is naturally abundant, is used to perform the oxythermal reforming (OTR) reaction [1,2,3]. OTR is a significant industrial process that produces syngas (synthesis gas H2, CO) from a feedstock mixture (CO2 and CH4) with the dilution of nitrogen through a highly stable Ni-based mixed oxide catalyst [4,5]. Apart from the OTR reaction, highly crystalline mixed oxides over supported metallic materials have been well used for steam and dry reforming reactions. The significant use of syngas in various fine chemical and fuel cell industries is growing by 6 EJ produced globally each year, accounting for nearly 2% utilization [6,7,8,9]. The characteristics of syngas can impact combustion processes in internal combustion engines, with properties like the OTR process being blended with the two reactions of steam reforming and partial reforming in a single reactor. The reactor holds both endothermic and exothermic reactions; the produced energy will be utilized for consecutive reactions. Although this reaction has a significant industrial application, many stability issues need to be addressed to obtain the ideal syngas ratio.
Optimizing the catalyst parameters, like obtaining the highly crystalline, metal dispersion of mixed oxides with the optimization of the physical properties through one-pot synthesis is a challenging quest. Distribution, with the synergy of metallic particles over the surface, and the basicity of the surface are potential factors for stable syngas production. Research addresses the main challenge of soot formation on catalytic beds. Our article mainly focuses on catalyst synthesis through co-precipitation method to trigger soot formation and reactions leading to atomic economy. The basicity and high surface oxygen content help to oxidize the soot formation over the catalyst surface during a reforming reaction. A mixed oxide catalyst may be loaded with a rich oxygen element like a cerium oxide catalyst with reaction parameters resulting in an economical process [6,7,8,9]. The parameters of the catalyst must align with the composition of feed gases and the production H2/CO ratio. The methane decomposition part of the reaction will go over the metallic sites like copper, Fe, Co, Ni-based catalysts, and Pt-, Rh-, and Ru-doped catalysts, while the use of promoters like Ce, Ca, and K metal formulations such as Fe, Co, and Ni [10,11,12,13,14,15,16] as bifunctional catalysts is suitable. Another part of CO2 dissociation is processed through basic sites on the catalyst surface. More recently, mixed oxide catalysts with bifunctional properties that have emerged for partial oxidation (POX), dry reforming, and autothermal reforming (ATR) may facilitate the dehydrogenation and dissociation of methane and disproportionation of carbon oxide over metals like, e.g., CeO2, ZrO2, and Bi2O5 to provide selective oxidation functionality without deactivation, whereas optimizing the reaction and catalyst parameters is the quest.
This report is intended to showcase the effect of parameters like metal dispersion, basicity, crystallinity, and surface area on the screening results of the oxythermal reforming of CH4 with CO2 at 800 °C over metallic mixed oxide catalysts. The mono- and bimetallic catalysts, i.e., Ni/ZrO2, Ni–Ba/ZrO2, Ni–Ca/ZrO2 and Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 are prepared using the coprecipitation method to understand the effect of the promoter (Ba and/or Ca) on the optimized reforming reaction.

2. Result and Discussion

2.1. Catalyst Surface Properties

The mixed oxide catalysts physicochemical properties are listed in Table 1 and Table 2. In Table 1, the elemental analysis is found be close to the initial composition of the mixed oxide. The Ni, with and without metals (Ba, Ca), promoted by a ZrO2-supported catalyst, shows a significant difference in surface area, which may make a difference in chemisorption activities. The Ni-Ba/ZrO2 shows a surface area of 131.41 m2/g, whereas Ni–Ca/ZrO2 was found to be 145.18 m2/g, respectively.
The addition of both metals, Ba and Ca, over Ni/ZrO2 shows a remarkable improvement in surface area of 157.15 m2/g. Similarly, pore diameter and pore volume also increase in the order of Ni/ZrO2 ˂ Ni–Ba/ZrO2 ˂ Ni–Ca/ZrO2 ˂ Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2, respectively. The significant rise in surface area of the bimetallic catalyst (Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2) is clear evidence of the influence of the promoter in the solid matrix. The Ni/ZrO2 metal dispersion is 0.1%; Ni–Ba/ZrO2 was found to be 4.8%; whereas Ni–Ca/ZrO2 was found to be 5.2%, respectively. The addition of Ba and Ca showed a potential rise in metal dispersion of 7.4%. The crystallinity of the solid catalysts is analyzed by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) for phase purity. Figure 1, for Ni–Ba/ZrO2, Ni–Ca/ZrO2, and Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2, shows the typical cubic fluorite-type phase (PDF-ICDD 28-0271). The key ZrO2 support lines of (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) confirm that Ni, Ba, and Ca are incorporated in the lattice of the solid solution [16,17]. The sharper peak was found over 29° and, 30.97°, and the monoclinic phase was identified over 30.97°, 49.8°, and 58.6° angles. The peak intensity is sharper over Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 compared with Ni–Ba/ZrO2 and Ni–Ca/ZrO2.

2.2. Effect of Ba and Ca Metal Loading on Oxythermal Reforming

The present oxythermal reforming feedstock has a typical ratio of CH4:CO:O2 = 1:1:0.2, which is endothermic in nature. Partial oxidation of methane offers a substitute to reduce the operational budget, but it relies on oxygen, making oxygen production expenses approximately 50% of the total investment and posing a high explosion risk at elevated temperatures. Our earlier report confirms that the addition of second and third metals to Ni was found to be a very effective NiCoMn/ZrO2 trimetallic catalyst for the autothermal reforming reaction. The addition of the metal Ce and K was found to have a positive result, with the stability of methane and CO2 decomposition being 95.5% and 89.9%, respectively [18,19]. According to Figure 2, all the catalysts show comparable chemisorption over catalytic surfaces. Ni/ZrO2 catalyst CH4 conversion drops drastically from 43.2 wt.%, whereas CO2 conversion drops from 33.2 wt.%.
The coke samples were tested after the 29 h spent with the catalyst using TGA. The Ni/ZrO2 catalyst led to the highest coke formation of 19.46 wt.%, with the surface becoming inactive after 25 h of steam. The addition of Ba and Ca in the Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 catalyst had potentially stable activity, whereas the Ni–Ca/ZrO2 and Ni–Ba/ZrO2 showed a considerable decrease in conversion with coke formation of 1.68% and 3.57% at 800 °C. The better activity of Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 may be attributed to high crystallinity with surface area, which led to better metal dispersion. Takeguchi et al. [20] tested Ni/ZrO2 for partial oxidation, steam reforming, and autothermal reforming reactions at 550 °C and 650 °C by varying the feed compositions. The CH4 conversion was found higher in autothermal reforming and lower in partial oxidation over ZrO2-supported bimetallic catalyst with better stability over the time.
Figure 3. H2/CO ratio over bimetallic catalysts (■) Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2, (●) Ni–Ca/ZrO2, (▲) Ni–Ba/ZrO2, (▼) Ni/ZrO2 at 800 °C.
Figure 3. H2/CO ratio over bimetallic catalysts (■) Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2, (●) Ni–Ca/ZrO2, (▲) Ni–Ba/ZrO2, (▼) Ni/ZrO2 at 800 °C.
Catalysts 15 00700 g003
The production of the H2/CO ratio reached above 1:1 ratio throughout the oxythermal reforming of methane, which is the feedstock for oxygenate synthesis. The H2/CO ratio for Ni/ZrO2 was 0.7 and dropped significantly. Figure 3 shows the Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 reached 1:5 with considerable stability, whereas the H2/CO ratio of Ni–Ca/ZrO2 was 1:3 and lost stability after 14 h of time on stream. The Ni–Ca/ZrO2 chemisorption showed H2/CO ratio of 1:1 and a stability decrease with a time on stream of 7 h. Our previous report shows that the perovskite La1−xBaxMnO3 used for the reforming reaction of CO2 with CH4 over varying ratios of the metals Ba/Mn achieves a high porosity and surface area for stable conversion and H2/CO selectivity. We found that the optimum amount of Mn3+/Mn4+ to Mn2+ promoted oxygen availability to remove coke. The lattice oxygen is very effective for maintaining surface activity stability of [13]. The tri-reforming of methane was found to be cost effective due to the combination of steam and dry reforming with partial oxidation (CH4 + O2 + CO2 + H2O), which may be associated with the compensations and shortcomings of each process. Figure 4 shows the H2/CO ratio of our previous report. The Ni/AlCeZrOx catalyst showed much potential and was shown to be an outstanding candidate by the addition of a second metal, i.e., La, Mg, Co, and Fe.
With the addition of the second metal, cobalt, manganese with Ni shows a promising improvement in conversion with remarkable stability and negligible amounts of coke formation [20,21,22,23,24]. This report also observes the basicity of the surface is quite critical for CO2 dissociation. A well-known drawback of reforming reactions is rapid coke formation, which may lead to the deactivation of the catalyst surface, which may be attributed to coke deposition and catalyst sintering [25,26,27]. The tri-reforming of methane has the potential to significantly reduce carbon deposition. In addition, the presence of O2 in the feed enables in-situ energy generation through exothermal methane oxidation, enhancing the energy efficiency of the process. Furthermore, the ability to adjust reactant compositions allows for versatile gas composition synthesis, suitable for various synthesis gas applications.

2.3. Effect of Basicity on Conversion and Selectivity

Basicity is very significant in influencing the soot oxidation process and CO2 activation, which makes the catalyst surface active throughout the steam. The basic strength of catalyst was found for weak sites at temperatures of <200 °C, medium sites at temperatures of 200–350 °C, strong sites at temperatures of 350–600 °C, and very strong sites at temperatures of >600 °C [11]. For Ni/ZrO2, Ni-Ba/ZrO2, Ni-Ca/ZrO2, and Ni-Ba-Ca/ZrO2, Table 3 shows two prominent levels of basicity at weak and very strong sites.
At high temperatures, the response of Ni/ZrO2 was found to be 2.6 µmol/g; the response of Ni–Ba/ZrO2 was found to be 19.6 µmol/g; the response of Ni–Ca/ZrO2 was found to be 39.8 µmol/g; and the response of Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 found to be 51.8 µmol/g. The increase in basic sites clearly confirms the metal influence over the catalysts surface, which facilitates a significant improvement in reaction parameters [28,29,30]. The surface basicity may provide three different roles: (i) enhancement of CO2 adsorption and activation, (ii) coke removal via gasification, and (iii) promoting CH4 activation. The basicity of the catalyst is a potential characteristic for the activation and adsorption of CO2 and H2O, which are acidic in nature. The role of surface basicity is the enhancement of CO2 adsorption and activation. The basic sites (electron-rich oxides) strongly adsorb the weakly acidic molecule. These basic sites promote CO2 activation, enabling CO2 dissociation [31,32,33]. The oxythermal reforming results in coke forming over the catalyst surface due to the low basic sites of Ni/ZrO2. The high surface basic sites of Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 promote coke gasification by CO2 activation and maintain the catalytic activity.
C(S) + CO2 → 2 CO
The strong adsorption of carbon precursors by basicity sites decreases the Boudouard reaction and methane cracking, which results in a higher syngas yield over time on stream.
C(S) + H2O → 2 CO + H2
The perfect utilization of CO2 (reaction 1) leading to a favorable shift in the product ratio (reaction 2) provides the H2-rich syngas less atomic loss. Ni–Ca/ZrO2 was found to have better stability. Throughout the 29 h of time on stream (Figure 2), there was low deactivation compared to Ni-Ba/ZrO2. The basic sites may also synergize the metal sites dispersion as a dual function. Figure 5 shows the H2/CO ratio of Ca as a second metal, and Ni–Ca/ZrO2 was also found to be quite stable compared with monometallic Ni/ZrO2.
Jin et al. [9] experimented with Mg addition with different amounts of MgO doped over Ni/Al2O3 for the dry reforming reaction and found it to be quite effective. The optimal addition of MgO enhances catalyst basicity, which facilitates CO2 activation and adsorption [11]. The catalytic process leads to the gasification of coke precursors [34,35,36]. The basic strength of the catalyst may also neutralize the acid-based reaction, which affects the carbon economy. The H2/CO ratio is 1.5 over Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2, which seems to show that bimetallic synergy between the support and metal provides excellent physicochemical interactions by enhancing the basicity, and metal dispersion facilitates the reduction of carbon filament growth and leads to stable syngas production. The Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 catalyst shows negligible (0.98%) coke formation for 29 h on stream and is labeled as an efficacy catalyst due to the perfect combination of metallic sites and basicity of the catalyst surface leading to stability, selectivity, and longevity towards syngas (H2 + CO).

3. Experimental Methods

3.1. Synthesis of Mixed Oxide Catalytic Materials

The nitrate based precursors of nickel, barium, and calcium are immersed in distilled water to completely dissolve and become precipitated with an aqueous solution of NaOH at room temperature at a pH of 8.3. The supported zirconium oxychloride is dissolved separately to precipitate with an aqueous solution of NaOH at room temperature at a pH of 8.3. Both precipitates were mixed, and the pH was adjusted to 8.3 and aged. The precipitate was aged for 6 h under continuous stirring. The mature precipitates were vacuum filtered to wash off all nitrates in the mixture. The filtrate was air-dried for 28 h at 110 °C. The dried mixed oxides are powdered with agate mortar before the firing (calcination) in a furnace. The resulting powdered mixed oxide materials Ni/ZrO2, Ni-Ca/ZrO2 Ni-Ba/ZrO2, and Ni-Ba-Ca/ZrO2 (Table 1) were stored in desiccator for characterization and the screening of oxythermal reforming.

3.2. Characterization and Catalytic Activity

The mixed oxide materials were characterized for crystallinity, surface area, volume, and basicity using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET), and CO2-TPD using the procedure from our earlier reports [11]. The oxythermal reforming was carried out in a fixed-bed tubular reactor with a loading of 0.3 g of mixed oxides prior to reduction in the presence of H2 at 530 °C for 2 h. The oxythermal reforming reaction was carried out at 800 °C using a mixture of CH4:CO:O2 = 1:1:0.2 ratios with Gas Hourly Space Velocity (GHSV) was 21,000−1 with N2 (1 mole) with dilution. The catalyst test was performed in a fixed bed reactor with stable feed gas composition, temperature control (±1 °C), and consistent flow rates. All the reactor conditions are verified thoroughly before starting the reactions. The product H2 and CO (syngas) stream was evaluated by online gas chromatography Agilent Inc, India. The online gas chromatography is calibrated regularly with gas standards to ensure the accuracy of analysis composition. The CH4, CO conversions, and H2:CO ratios were analyzed after 1 h of steady state reaction, and conversion and selectivity calculations were provided in our earlier reports [11].

4. Summary

Oxythermal reforming is a well-known process for the production of syngas. The reforming catalyst is mainly composed of active metals like Ni, Ba, and Ca over a ZrO2 support. The bimetallic catalyst is prepared using the coprecipitation method at a pH of 8.3 and characterized for crystallinity by X-ray diffraction, crystal morphology, surface area, pore volume, and metal dispersion. Oxythermal reforming over Ni/ZrO2, Ni-Ba/ZrO2, Ni-Ca/ZrO2, and Ni-Ba-Ca/ZrO2 is screened at 800 °C. The screening results for Ni/ZrO2 show a drastic fall in conversion. The bimetallic Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 was found to be a stable catalyst that could withstand the time on steam. The Ni-Ba/ZrO2 and Ni–Ca/ZrO2 were found to have unstable catalytic activity with a lack of metal dispersion and crystallinity. The decomposition of CH4 over metallic sites is more effective over Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2 compared to Ni–Ba/ZrO2 and Ni–Ca/ZrO2. The disproportionation and effective activation of CO2 due to the basic sites of the surface establish the interaction and withstand coke gasification.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.B. and. H.J.B.; methodology, A.G.B. and N.G.S.R.; validation, N.G.S.R. and A.G.B.; and formal analysis, A.G.B.; investigation, H.J.B.; resources, A.G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing H.J.B., N.G.S.R. and A.G.B.; visualization, A.G.B.; supervision, A.G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received external funding by Ministry of Education of project reference No. RS-2023-00301974. This project is for learning & academic research institution for Master’s, PhD students, and Postdocs (LAMP) program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to CSIR-Central Institute of Mining and Research, Dhanbad, India for suggestion to carry out this research project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J.; Matteo, D.; Joshua, M. Quantifying the flexibility of hydrogen production systems to support large-scale renewable energy integration. J. Power Sources 2018, 399, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carapellucci, R.; Giordano, L. Modeling and optimization of an energy generation island based on renewable technologies and hydrogen storage systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 2081–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Avril, S.; Arnaud, S.; Florentin, G.; Vinard, A. Multi-objective optimization of batteries and hydrogen storage technologies for remote photovoltaic systems. Energy 2010, 35, 5300–5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meille, V. Review on methods to deposit catalysts on structured surfaces. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2006, 315, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sutthiumporn, K.; Kawi, S. Current advances in syngas (CO + H2) production through bi-reforming of methane using various catalysts: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 32809–32845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pereñguez, R.; González-DelaCruz, V.; Holgado, J.; Caballero, A. Modifying the Size of Nickel Metallic Particles H2/CO Treatment in Ni/ZrO2 Methane Dry Reforming Catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 2011, 1, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moradi, A.; Rahmanzadeh, G.R.; Sharifnia, M.S. Kinetic investigation of CO2 reforming of CH4 over La-Ni based perovskite. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162, 787–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alipour, Z.; Rezaei, M.; Meshkani, F. Effect of Ni Loadings on the Activity and Coke Formation of MgO-Modified Ni/Al2O3Nanocatalyst in Dry Reforming of Methane. J. Energy Chem. 2014, 23, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jin, B.; Li, S.; Liang, X. Enhanced activity and stability of MgO-promoted Ni/Al2O3 catalyst for dry reforming of methane: Role of MgO. Fuel 2020, 284, 119082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nahar, G. Hydrogen production from reforming of biogas: Review of technological advances and an Indian perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 1032–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bhavani, A.G.; Kim, W.Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, J.S. Improved activity and coke resistance by promoters of nanosized trimetallic catalysts for autothermal carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 450, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pal, D.B. Performance of water gas shift reaction catalysts: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 549–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Niu, J.; Wang, Y.; Liland, E.S.; Regli, K.S.; Yang, J.; Rout, K.R.; Luo, J.; Rønning, M.; Ran, J.; Chen, D. Unraveling Enhanced Activity, Selectivity, and Coke Resistance of Pt–Ni Bimetallic Clusters in Dry Reforming. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 2398–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, Q.; Wang, D.; Gu, Y.; Yang, S.; Tang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Q. Techno-economic evaluation of CO2-rich natural gas dry reforming for linear alpha olefins production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 205, 112348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tatsuya, T.; Shin-Nosuke, F.; Masashi, I.; Koichi, E. Autothermal reforming of methane over Ni catalysts supported over CaO–CeO2–ZrO2 solid solution. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2003, 240, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, J.; Xiao, Q.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, Y. NiO-MgO nanoparticles confined inside SiO2 frameworks to achieve highly catalytic performance for CO2 reforming of methane. Mole. Catal. 2017, 432, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barzegari, F.; Rezaei, M.; Kazemeini, M.; Farhadi, F.; Keshavarz, A. The Influence of Lanthanide on NiO-MgO-SiO2 Catalysts for Syngas Production via propane steam reforming. Mole. Catal. 2020, 499, 111281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yahia Ahmad, H.; Assem, T.; Mohamed, T.; Hany, A.; El-Sayed, A.K.; Al-Qaradawi, S.Y. Design of Ni/La2O3 catalysts for dry reforming of methane: Understanding the impact of synthesis methods. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 41294–41309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yasotha, K.; Warintorn, T.; Kesada, S.; Sibudjing, K. Inverse NiAl2O4 on LaAlO3–Al2O3: Unique Catalytic Structure for Stable CO2 Reforming of Methane. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 8120–8130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, R.; Kumar, K.; Pant, K.K.; Choudary, N.V. Tuning the Metal-Support Interaction of Methane Tri-Reforming Catalysts for Industrial Flue Gas Utilization. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 1911–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vogt, C.; Kranenborg, J.; Monai, M.; Weckhuysen, B.M. Structure Sensitivity in Steam and Dry Methane Reforming over Nickel: Activity and Carbon Formation. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 1428–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Min, J.-E.; Lee, Y.-J.; Park, H.-G.; Zhang, C.; Jun, K.-W. Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane on Ni–MgO–Al2O3 Catalysts Prepared by Sol–Gel Method: Effects of Mg/Al Ratios. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 26, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fei, J.; Hou, Z.; Zheng, X.; Yashima, T. Doped Ni Catalysts for Methane Reforming with CO2. Catal. Lett. 2004, 98, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Álvarez, M.A.; Bobadilla, L.F.; Garcilaso, V.; Centeno, M.A.; Odriozola, J.A. CO2 Reforming of Methane over Ni-Ru Supported Catalysts: On the Nature of Active Sites by Operando DRIFTS Study. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 24, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Katheria, S.; Kunzru, D.; Deo, G. Kinetics of Steam Reforming of Methane on Rh–Ni/MgAl2O4 Catalyst. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2020, 130, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Álvarez Moreno, A.; Ramirez-Reina, T.; Ivanova, S.; Roger, A.-C.; Centeno, M.Á.; Odriozola, J.A. Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 694976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Torimoto, M.; Sekine, Y. Effects of Alloying for Steam or Dry Reforming of Methane: A Review of Recent. Studies. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 3387–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Parsapur, R.K.; Chatterjee, S.; Huang, K.-W. The Insignificant Role of Dry Reforming of Methane in CO2 Emission Relief. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 2881–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Theofanidis, S.A.; Galvita, V.V.; Poelman, H.; Batchu, R.; Buelens, L.C.; Detavernier, C.; Marin, G.B. Mechanism of Carbon Deposits Removal from Supported Ni Catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 239, 502–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Titus, J.; Roussière, T.; Wasserschaff, G.; Schunk, S.; Milanov, A.; Schwab, E.; Wagner, G.; Oeckler, O.; Gläser, R. Dry Reforming of Methane with Carbon Dioxide over NiO–MgO–ZrO2. Catal. Today 2016, 270, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kwon, D.; Kang, J.Y.; An, S.; Yang, I.; Jung, J.C. Tuning the Base Properties of Mg–Al Hydrotalcite Catalysts Using Their Memory Effect. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 46, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Adamu, S.; Bawah, A.-R.; Muraza, O.; Malaibari, Z.; Hossain, M.M. Effects of Metal Support Interaction on Dry Reforming of Methane over Ni/Ce-Al2O3 Catalysts. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 98, 2425–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hong Phuong, P.; Cam Anh, H.; Tri, N.; Phung Anh, N.; Cam Loc, L. Effect of Support on Stability and Coke Resistance of Ni-Based Catalyst in Combined Steam and CO2 Reforming of CH4. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 20092–20103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Coster, V.; Srinath, N.V.; Theofanidis, S.A.; Pirro, L.; Van Alboom, A.; Poelman, H.; Sabbe, M.K.; Marin, G.B.; Galvita, V.V. Looking inside a Ni-Fe/MgAl2O4 Catalyst for Methane Dry Reforming via Mössbauer Spectroscopy and in Situ QXAS. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 300, 120720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Meloni, E.; Martino, M.; Palma, V. A Short Review on Ni Based Catalysts and Related Engineering Issues for Methane Steam Reforming. Catalysts 2020, 10, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xuan, T.N.; Filippo, B.; Claudio, E.; Vladimiro, D.S.; Vladimiro, D.S. Methane Reforming Processes: Advances on Mono- and Bimetallic Ni-Based Catalysts Supported on Mg-Al Mixed Oxides. Catalysts 2023, 13, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Results of X-ray diffraction and morphology of Ni–bimetallic/ZrO2 mixed oxide catalysts. (a) Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2, (b) Ni–Ca/ZrO2, (c) Ni–Ba/ZrO2.
Figure 1. Results of X-ray diffraction and morphology of Ni–bimetallic/ZrO2 mixed oxide catalysts. (a) Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2, (b) Ni–Ca/ZrO2, (c) Ni–Ba/ZrO2.
Catalysts 15 00700 g001
Figure 2. CH4 and CO2 conversion over bimetallic catalysts (■) Ni-Ba–Ca/ZrO2, (●) Ni–Ca/ZrO2, (▲) Ni–Ba/ZrO2, (▼) Ni/ZrO2 at 800 °C.
Figure 2. CH4 and CO2 conversion over bimetallic catalysts (■) Ni-Ba–Ca/ZrO2, (●) Ni–Ca/ZrO2, (▲) Ni–Ba/ZrO2, (▼) Ni/ZrO2 at 800 °C.
Catalysts 15 00700 g002
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the chemisorption of the oxythermal reforming process over a Ba- and Ca- loaded Ni/ZrO2 bimetallic catalyst.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the chemisorption of the oxythermal reforming process over a Ba- and Ca- loaded Ni/ZrO2 bimetallic catalyst.
Catalysts 15 00700 g004
Figure 5. Schematic representation of coke gasification over the basic sites of a Ba-, and Ca-loaded Ni/ZrO2 bimetallic catalyst.
Figure 5. Schematic representation of coke gasification over the basic sites of a Ba-, and Ca-loaded Ni/ZrO2 bimetallic catalyst.
Catalysts 15 00700 g005
Table 1. Synthesis composition and elemental analysis of Ni-bimetallic/ZrO2 mixed oxide catalyst materials.
Table 1. Synthesis composition and elemental analysis of Ni-bimetallic/ZrO2 mixed oxide catalyst materials.
Catalyst
Code a
Metal Content wt.%Elemental Analysis%
NiBaCaZrNiBaCaZr
Ni/ZrO220008019.970078.98
Ni–Ba/ZrO2201007019.919.89069.91
Ni–Ca/ZrO2200107019.9709.9169.89
Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO220557019.984.824.8169.87
a Prepared using the co-precipitation method.
Table 2. Chemisorption properties of Ni–bimetallic/ZrO2 mixed oxide catalysts.
Table 2. Chemisorption properties of Ni–bimetallic/ZrO2 mixed oxide catalysts.
Catalyst CodeSurface Area m2/g aPore Diameter
(nm) a
Pore Volume (cm3/g) aMetal Dispersion (%) bMetallic Surface Area m2/g bCoke Content wt.% c
Ni/ZrO258.712.090.020.10.0119.46
Ni–Ba/ZrO2131.417.10.574.82.13.57
Ni–Ca/ZrO2145.187.60.615.22.61.68
Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO2157.158.30.677.43.10.90
a Measured by N2 physisorption; b measured from the Auto Chem program in CO pulse chemisorption; c coke content is measured after 3000 min of methanation by TGA analysis.
Table 3. CO2–TPD analysis of Ni–bimetallic/ZrO2 mixed oxide catalysts.
Table 3. CO2–TPD analysis of Ni–bimetallic/ZrO2 mixed oxide catalysts.
Catalyst CodeBasic Sites µmol/g
Weak (<200 °C) Medium
(200–350 °C)
Strong
(350–600 °C)
Very Strong
(>600 °C)
Ni/ZrO212.415.10.312.6
Ni–Ba/ZrO25.390.10.4119.6
Ni–Ca/ZrO211.240.81.9739.8
Ni–Ba–Ca/ZrO215.911.32.751.8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bong, H.J.; Subba Reddy, N.G.; Bhavani, A.G. Mechanistic Behavior of Basicity of Bimetallic Ni/ZrO2 Mixed Oxides for Stable Oxythermal Reforming of CH4 with CO2. Catalysts 2025, 15, 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15080700

AMA Style

Bong HJ, Subba Reddy NG, Bhavani AG. Mechanistic Behavior of Basicity of Bimetallic Ni/ZrO2 Mixed Oxides for Stable Oxythermal Reforming of CH4 with CO2. Catalysts. 2025; 15(8):700. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15080700

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bong, Hyuk Jong, Nagireddy Gari Subba Reddy, and A. Geetha Bhavani. 2025. "Mechanistic Behavior of Basicity of Bimetallic Ni/ZrO2 Mixed Oxides for Stable Oxythermal Reforming of CH4 with CO2" Catalysts 15, no. 8: 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15080700

APA Style

Bong, H. J., Subba Reddy, N. G., & Bhavani, A. G. (2025). Mechanistic Behavior of Basicity of Bimetallic Ni/ZrO2 Mixed Oxides for Stable Oxythermal Reforming of CH4 with CO2. Catalysts, 15(8), 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15080700

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop