Next Article in Journal
Current Strategies to Improve the Properties of Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Effective and Scalable Wastewater Pollutant Removal: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Journal
Optimized Tandem Affinity Purification Strategy Enables High-Yield Isolation and Functional Characterization of Native COMPASS in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Correlation of the Microstructural, Chemical, Luminescent, and Photocatalytic Properties of SrGd2O4 Doped with Rare Earth Ions

Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11351 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2025, 15(6), 522; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15060522
Submission received: 15 April 2025 / Revised: 7 May 2025 / Accepted: 20 May 2025 / Published: 26 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Photocatalysis for Environmental Applications)

Abstract

:
This study evaluated the relationship between the microstructure, photoluminescence, and photocatalytic properties of newly synthesized nanostructured phosphor materials. The combustion method was used to create samples of down-converting SrGd2O4 doped with Dy3+ ions (1, and 7 at%) and up-converting SrGd2O4 co-doped with varying quantities of Yb3+ ions (2, and 6 at%) and a constant quantity of Ho3+ ions (1 at%). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed the existence of porous agglomerated round-shaped particles, with the size around 150 nm, arranged in network-like structures. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) confirmed the presence of all structural elements and their homogeneous distribution throughout the particles. The presence of specific emission peaks associated with Dy3+ or Ho3+ dopant ions was demonstrated by luminescent measurement. The degradation processes of specific organic dyes (methylene blue for up-converters and rhodamine B for down-converters) under simulated sun irradiation were used to investigate photocatalytic activity. A reduction in dye concentration in aqueous solutions was measured using UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy. The results showed a successful dye breakdown rate after 4 h, and aliquots of the working solutions were obtained at precise intervals. Additionally, the results indicated that samples with the highest luminescence intensity exhibited superior photocatalytic activity, suggesting a significant promise for usage as multifunctional materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Concerns about environmental contamination, water scarcity, and climate change have grown significantly over the recent several decades of rapid industrial activity. People, animals, and plants can all be impacted by the different kinds of dangerous chemicals that are growing in water supplies. A significant volume of industrial wastewater is discharged into the untreated environment. This untreated wastewater often contains contaminants such as pesticides, colors, personal care products, and pharmaceuticals. These contaminants pose a serious risk to the environment and human health, either directly or indirectly [1,2,3].
Photocatalytic degradation provides a workable method of decomposing organic pollutants and reducing the levels of residual contaminants in water bodies using sustainable solar energy. This cost-effective, environmentally responsible, and efficient degradation approach is an excellent strategy to deal with environmental problems. Without the need for additional oxidants or reductants, this mechanism can break down popular antibiotics, pesticides, and colors, thereby halting the spread of pollutant resistance. However, for traditional photocatalytic devices, the band and surface structures of the catalyst are essential. Issues, including delayed electron-hole pair separation and a lack of active surface sites, lead to its poor performance [4,5]. There is a constant search for appropriate photocatalysts because of their low efficiency, poor biodegradability, and expensive industrial application, which make them uninteresting for large-scale production. To date, a wide range of materials have been used as photocatalysts, but oxides have certainly been the most researched [6,7,8,9]. Only UV light, which takes up only 4% of the solar spectrum, can activate them due to their wide band gaps, which is the limiting factor for light exploitation [10]. Higher photocatalytic efficiency can be achieved by materials using the visible part of the solar spectrum by adjusting the energy gap with convenient methods. Doping is a straightforward process that can be carried out by connecting with other semiconductors, using rare earth (RE) ions, transition metals or other metallic nanoparticles, or using dyes [11,12].
Rare earth (RE) elements are particularly useful for the photocatalytic degradation of different pollutants. Their existence in the material suggests a higher rate of e+/h pair formation and a slower recombination rate, owing to the increased number of energy levels coming from RE ions to which photogenerated e can be transferred [13,14,15,16].
In the visible, infrared, and ultraviolet (UV) regions of the electromagnetic spectrum, RE metals from the lanthanide class of elements exhibit exceptional luminescence properties due to their rich energy level structure. Consequently, they have a wide range of applications, such as solid-state lighting, optical amplifiers, bio-imaging, solar cells, photocatalysis, sensing, therapy, and diagnostics [17,18,19,20,21]. Because of their 4f–5d transitions, RE elements, which act as the luminescent centers that produce light with carefully controlled color, are commonly doped into the host matrix of luminescent materials. Among the RE trivalent ions (Er3+, Tm3+, Ho3+, Pr3+, and Nd3+), Ho3+ emits visible green light efficiently when combined with Yb3+, which absorbs near-infrared (NIR) light and transfers it to holmium, producing up-conversion luminescent material. Ho3+ has multiple long-lived metastable levels that, upon activation, could cause radiative relaxation, leading to the appearance of UV/Vis emission [22,23,24]. On the other hand, because of their multiple energy levels and the wide range of colors they emit, the down-conversion elements (e.g., Dy3+, Eu3+, Sm3+) are particularly relevant for various phosphor applications [25].
Apart from traditional oxides, mixed oxides are also successfully used as a matrix for photocatalytic applications. Strontium gadolinium oxide (SrGd2O4) is an ecologically safe material with favorable features, including good thermal and charge stability, a refractive index (n~2), high density (7.3 g/cm3), and high chemical strength. The main advantage of this host is its low photon energy (about 475 cm−1) compared to the most used oxide host, Y2O3 (~600 cm−1). Furthermore, if we compare our host matrix to sulfide-based phosphors, Y2O2S, for example, the volatility of sulfur diminishes luminescent efficiency and limits their use in field emission displays. Fluoride-based hosts (like NaYF4, CsY2F7, and RbY2F7) are preferred for some phosphor applications because they also have relatively low phonon energies, meaning that non-radiative transitions (energy losses due to lattice vibrations) are less likely to occur, resulting in more efficient luminescence. But on the other hand, major concerns about excessive fluoride intake and related toxicity were raised worldwide, leading several countries to ban the use of fluorides. With all this in mind, it is critical to produce environmentally friendly phosphors capable of withstanding the high temperatures generated by LEDs and FEDs. Furthermore, thermal stability has a significant impact on the lifetime and brightness of display devices. As a result, it can be used as a platform for generating novel multifunctional phosphors [26,27].
The claim that materials with strong luminescent qualities cannot be good photocatalysts and vice versa is supported by the findings of several authors [28,29,30,31,32]. When an electron returns from the excited state to its ground state, it emits photons, a process known as luminescence, which is actually a recombination. Consequently, a material with a stronger luminescent emission should exhibit a lower level of photocatalytic activity (because of more frequent recombination). In other words, photoluminescence and photocatalysis are two processes that compete with one another. However, while talking about this subject, there are additional things to consider, including different matrix defects, the presence of impurities or dopants, oxygen vacancies, OH groups on the material’s surface, etc. Furthermore, photocatalytic effectiveness may also be affected by the influence of the reaction’s medium, particularly the involvement of water molecules [33,34].
The literature contains findings that suggest materials with excellent luminescent qualities may also have good photocatalytic efficiency [33,35,36,37]. Investigating down-conversion SrGd2O4:Dy3+ and up-conversion SrGd2O4:Yb3+, Ho3+ luminescent materials as photocatalysts is the primary focus of this publication, with an emphasis on the correlation between luminescent and photocatalytic properties.

2. Results

Thorough microstructural analysis of as-synthesized samples was performed by combining conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with high-resolution TEM and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) methods. Low-magnification TEM images for two samples are presented in Figure 1a−d. Detailed examination demonstrated no significant dissimilarities in the microstructure between the samples; thus, only images of the selected samples were presented. Figure 1a,b reveals a structure in the form of large agglomerates composed of smaller irregularly shaped particles. It can be observed that the structure is porous, which is the anticipated effect of the selected combustion synthesis. The size of the particles can vary from 100 nm to a few hundred nm. Particles that are smaller than 150 nm can also be observed, and some of them are presented in Figure 1c,d.
To perform a thorough inspection of the crystalline structure, HR-TEM micrographs were recorded at high magnification, and FFT analysis was performed. The appropriate HR-TEM images of the magnified sections of two distinct particles are presented in Figure 2a,b with corresponding FFT images as insets. The existence of clearly visible crystallographic planes indicates the crystalline structure of the samples. Established lattice planes are (201) and (301), with calculated d-spacing values of 0.460 and 0.323 nm for SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%) and SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%), respectively. These findings are in agreement with the JCPDS Card No. 01-072-6387 for the pure SrGd2O4. Furthermore, the exact same highly ordered lattice stripes can also be distinguished by the FFT analysis, endorsing previously described discoveries.
The results of the SAED investigation are demonstrated in Figure 3a,b revealing diffraction patterns for SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%) and SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%), respectively. The polycrystalline structure of the samples is verified by the diffraction patterns visible as many bright spots (Figure 3a) and/or few thick diffraction rings (Figure 3b). Figure 3a reveals highly ordered bright spots, implying that particular grains exist as typical monocrystals. Nonetheless, distances between the diffraction center and bright spots were measured, exposing planes with Miller indexes (210), (114), (416), and (513), with d-spacing values of 0.283, 0.220, 0.143, and 0.160 nm, respectively. Calculated d-spacing values somewhat differ from the reference values for the planes (210) and (114), which can be ascribed to the adjustment of the unit cell parameters due to the ion swapping. Dy3+ ions are smaller than Gd3+ ions; hence, decreased interplanar spacing values after inserting Dy3+ instead of Gd3+ in the crystal lattice are anticipated. As for the sample doped with Ho/Yb, Figure 3b displays a diffraction pattern in the form of three thick diffraction rings, along with some bright spots. The appearance of diffraction rings suggests the polycrystalline structure of the sample. Since SrGd2O4 occurs as an orthorhombic lattice, which is verified by numerous diffraction peaks (JCPDS Card No. 01-072-6387), thick rings in the SAED image may refer to a few distinct but narrowly located diffraction rings merged altogether to form one thick ring. Having that in mind, it can be measured that the inner circle corresponds to the planes from (111) to (211), with d-spacing values from 0.316 to 0.278 nm, respectively. The middle and also the thickest diffraction circle indicate the presence of interplanar spacing distances from (114) to (117), with d-spacing values from 0.222 to 0.152 nm, respectively, while the outer circle corresponds to plane orientations with Miller indexes from (810) to (816), having d-spacing values from 0.118 to 0.102 nm, respectively. All presented results agree with the JCPDS Card No. 01-072-6387 assigned to SrGd2O4.
Acquired micrographs in the STEM mode, joined with EDS mapping, delivered significant understanding regarding the elemental composition of the as-synthesized samples. This investigation also provided valuable information on the dispersal of elements throughout the particles. STEM-HAADF micrographs with elemental mapping for the sample doped with Dy3+ are displayed in Figure 4, while the results of the same analysis for the sample doped with Ho3+ and Yb3+ are presented in Figure 5. Each chemical element is colored differently, showing the efficacious integration of dopants into the SrGd2O4 host lattice, as well as even distribution of all elements through the grains.
Figure 6a displays the emission spectra of SrGd2O4 doped with varying Dy3+ concentrations (1 and 7 at%) that were recorded at an excitation wavelength of 315 nm. The two dominant emissions at 490 nm and 581 nm are associated with the 4F9/26H15/2 and 4F9/26H13/2 transitions, respectively. The peak intensity decreases as the Dy3+ concentration rises, while the sample with the lowest dopant concentration has the maximum intensity.
Figure 6b depicts the concentration-dependent emission spectra of SrGd2O4 doped with varying Yb3+ (2 and 6 at%) and Ho3+ (1 at%) measured at the 976 nm excitation wavelength. The sample with the highest Yb3+ concentration had the most intense luminescence intensity. The main peaks correspond to two green emissions (centered at 540 and 550 nm), which are caused by electron transitions between the closely packed 5F4 and 5S2 levels and the 5I8 ground level. The weaker emission is due to the red emission (centered at 671 nm) caused by the 5F55I8 transition. The emission with the lowest intensity is NIR at 758 nm, produced from the 5F4,5S25I7 transition.
Based on the results of the photoluminescent study, we selected samples with the highest photoluminescence intensity for the demonstration of the results acquired from the UV-VIS measurements.
Optical measurements obtained by UV-VIS spectrophotometry can provide information on the material’s band gap energy, demonstrating its potential to be used as a photocatalyst. Diffuse reflectance spectra for selected samples doped with Dy3+ and Ho3+/Yb3+ are shown in Figure 7a,b respectively, along with derivative Kubelka-Munk functions as insets. Both DRS spectra showed maximums that can be assigned to Dy3+ and Gd3+ or Ho3+ and Gd3+ transitions, marked in each graph. Introducing various dopants clearly incites modifications in DRS spectra, noticeable in the region above 320 nm. Discovered peaks are a direct verification of the effective incorporation of dopants into the host lattice. Moreover, revealed peaks in the visible region are another indicator for a potentially good luminescent emission, which was previously demonstrated in the PL spectra shown in Figure 6.
The Kubelka-Munk function was completed in the form of a direct allowed transition, where R is the diffuse reflectance of the examined material, and according to the equation:
F R = ( 1 - R ) 2 2 R
Eg values were estimated by linear extrapolation from the absorption edge down to the energy axis [38,39]. The obtained results were around 4.3 eV for each sample, regardless of the used dopant ions. Furthermore, it can clearly be noticed from the K-M graphs that the experimental signal is not the same for each system. Accompanying levels appear in the energy band gap, implying that dopant incorporation introduces defects in the matrix. However, these levels are positioned at various energies, meaning that each dopant has a different influence on the material’s optical properties. Moreover, these extra levels can have a positive impact on the photocatalytic properties of the prepared materials by enhancing the degradation rate of the chosen pollutant. This is the consequence of forming oxygen vacancies or some other defects inside the crystal lattice or on the surface, which can reduce the recombination rate or act as scavengers for photogenerated electrons and therefore promote photocatalytic degradation [40,41].
The photocatalytic activity of as-synthesized powders was examined in the degradation reactions of organic dyes rhodamine B and methylene blue as model pollutants. The results are presented as comparative kinetic curves in Figure 8, where Figure 8a refers to the reaction of the photocatalytic degradation of RB using down-convertor nanopowder, while Figure 8b shows the degradation rate for MB over the up-convertor photocatalyst. The absorbance ratio A/A0 was measured at 554 nm or 664 nm for RB or MB, respectively.
In the beginning, the photolysis of 3 ppm RB or MB aqueous solution was conducted to investigate the stability of the color under the light source, but without a photocatalyst (black line). Dye degradation was minimal, so the experiments of the photocatalytic degradation in the presence of down- or up-converting nanoparticles were conducted under the same conditions. Before the illumination, the dye solution with the photocatalyst was mixed in the dark to obtain adsorption-desorption equilibrium, which took one hour to complete. Dye adsorption onto the photocatalyst surface was proven to be sufficient to enable photocatalytic reaction. Next, the photocatalytic experiment continued for four hours under simulated sunlight. At the end of the photocatalytic experiment, the degradation rate for RB revealed that the initial dye concentration was reduced by 46% with SrGd2O4 doped with 7 at% Dy3+ and by 54% after using SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Dy3+, as illustrated in Figure 8a. As for the MB mineralization, the degradation rate showed a decrease in the starting concentration of 45% when SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Ho3+ and 2 at% Yb3+ was used and of 56% with the sample doped with 1 at% Ho3+ and 6 at% Yb3+, as depicted in Figure 8b.
To evaluate the kinetics of the photocatalytic degradation reaction of RB, it was hypothesized that this reaction follows pseudo-first-order kinetics, since the dye is sufficiently diluted. Figure 9a depicts the results obtained for the photocatalytic degradation of the dye in the presence of the synthesized catalyst SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% of Dy3+. This is confirmed by a line that passes through the origin with a coefficient of adjustment equal to 0.99559, demonstrating that the hypothesis is correct. Thus, under these conditions, the specific reaction rate, k, is 0.00332 min−1. The same assumption is made for the catalyst SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Ho3+ and 6 at% Yb3+ to evaluate its kinetics. The findings of the dye’s photocatalytic degradation are shown in Figure 9b. A coefficient of adjustment is equal to 0.99031, while the specific rate of reaction, k, is 0.00279 min−1.
Two different mechanisms for the photocatalytic degradation of RB and MB exist [42,43]. The first one implies a breaking of the conjugated structure in the dye molecule by OH, reaching a complete mineralization. In this case, the intensity of the main peak drops down simultaneously, as does the smaller peak at lower wavelengths. The second degradation mechanism involves the de-ethylation process, recognizable by the uneven decrease of the previously mentioned peaks, either by the rise of the peak at lower wavelengths or by shifting the main peak to lower wavelengths, depending on the chosen color. As can be clearly seen from both Figure 10a,b, the intensity of RB and MB peaks is reduced simultaneously during reaction, implying direct degradation, which would ultimately cause total dye mineralization, forming non-toxic products such as H2O, CO2, and others.
In the up-conversion process, Yb3+ ions absorb low-energy photons at 976 nm from simulated sunlight and transmit them to Ho3+ ions. Following the excitation of Ho3+ ions, many relaxation processes occur, resulting in two green, red, and NIR emissions. Down-conversion recorded at an excitation wavelength of 315 nm shows blue and green emissions. The extra levels in the band gap (acquired following the addition of Yb3+/Ho3+ and Dy3+ ions) that permit absorption of light at 590 nm and lower allow SrGd2O4 to absorb the up- and down-conversion emission. The production of reactive species OH and O2−• is subsequently encouraged by the creation of a new bundle of e/h+ pairs, which significantly improves photocatalytic degradation of certain pollutants.
When discussing the photocatalytic process with down-converting nanoparticles, it can be concluded that material with lower dopant concentration exhibits better photocatalytic efficiency. On the other hand, in the case with the up-convertor, better photocatalytic activity was revealed with materials that contain higher dopant concentration. Nevertheless, both experiments have one thing in common, and that is the fact that in both cases material that demonstrated higher luminescence intensity also exhibited better photocatalytic properties. This means that as-synthesized powders evinced multifunctionality, demonstrating suitable characteristics to be used in applications as a light source, but also in the environmental fields for photocatalytic degradation of various pollutants. Reasons for this behavior of as-synthesized materials are yet to be studied, since many factors can incite revealed effects. Surface groups, oxygen vacancies, or some other defects inside the material can be created by incorporating diverse dopant ions in various concentrations into the host [40,41]. Since some data in the literature state that a good photocatalyst cannot be good luminescent material, this study undeniably represents the opposite claim and a valuable discovery, leaving the resolving of the obtained results to be a challenging task for future analysis.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Preparation

For the sample preparation and the photocatalytic experiments, strontium nitrate (Puratonic, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, 99.9%), gadolinium nitrate hexahydrate (Acros Organics, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, 99.9%), holmium nitrate hexahydrate (Acros Organics, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, 99.9%), ytterbium nitrate pentahydrate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA, 99.9%), dysprosium nitrate pentahydrate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA, 99.9%), citric acid (Kemika, Zagreb, Croatia, 99%), glycine (Kemika, Zagreb, Croatia, 99.5%), methylene blue (MB, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and rhodamine B (RhB, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, 99.8%) were used without further purification.
Up-conversion SrGd2O4 doped with Yb3+ (2 and 6 at%) and Ho3+ (1 at%) ions and down-conversion SrGd2O4 doped with Dy3+ (1 and 7 at%) samples were prepared via sol-gel combustion synthesis. Citric acid was utilized as a chelator and glycine as fuel. Our earlier papers provided a detailed explanation of this preparation technique [38,39]. To summarize, deionized water was used in a different beaker to dissolve strontium nitrate and rare-earth nitrates. Each solution was then mixed with citric acid and left to dissolve for half an hour at 70 °C on a magnetic stirrer. Glycine was then added after the solutions had been combined and heated to 120 °C. The mixing proceeded until a gel formed, which was then burned for 1.5 h at 500 °C, followed by 2.5 h of calcination at 1000 °C. A schematic presentation of the synthesis is presented in Figure 11.

3.2. Characterization Methods

A FEI Talos F200X microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an X-FEG source and a maximum accelerating voltage of 200 kV was used for microstructural examination utilizing transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Investigations were conducted using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and conventional and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM and HR-TEM). A tiny quantity of powder was dissolved in ethanol to prepare the sample for TEM analysis. A drop of the mixture was then placed onto a copper grid coated with carbon and allowed to dry in the open air. ImageJ software, version 1.54g, was used for image analysis and interplanar distance computations.
A Spex Fluorolog (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) spectrofluorometer was utilized to measure the luminescence spectra of the Dy3+ doped samples, while a TE-Cooled CCD fluorescence spectrometer (Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ, USA) and a 976 nm laser diode (Thorlabs) were utilized for photoluminescence emission measurements at room temperature for the Yb3+/Ho3+ doped samples.
A Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) UV-2600I spectrophotometer with an integrated sphere attachment was used for detecting UV–VIS. After recording the 200–1200 nm spectral region using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), the band gap value was estimated using the Kubelka–Munk algorithm.

3.3. Photocatalytic Performance Test

The photocatalytic degradation of MB was performed in 3 ppm aqueous solution using 20 mg up-conversion SrGd2O4:Yb, Ho samples under light illumination (Osram Vitalux lamp, 300 W, 270 V, sunlight simulation; white light: UVB radiated power from 280 to 315 nm, 3.0 W; UVA radiated power 315–400 nm, 13.6 W; the rest of the spectrum corresponds to visible and IR light, positioned 30 cm over the reaction solution). Under the same conditions, the degradation of RB was carried out using SrGd2O4: Dy samples as photocatalysts. To reach the adsorption-desorption equilibrium, the reaction solution was placed in the dark for one hour before illumination. To keep the reaction solution from heating up and evaporating, the system was frequently iced. Throughout the photocatalysis, a constant flow of O2 was bubbled through either MB or RB aqueous solutions. After centrifuging 2 cm3 aliquots for 30 min, the supernatant’s absorption spectra were recorded. The first aliquot was obtained just before the start of the procedure, and the second one was obtained one hour after adsorption in the absence of light. Following a 30-min break, the third and fourth aliquots were taken during light irradiation. The final three aliquots were drowned out one at a time, after one hour, for the next three hours. To ensure that the catalyst particles were evenly distributed throughout the experiment, MB or RB aqueous solutions were maintained on the magnetic stirrer.

4. Conclusions

The aim of this study was to investigate the parallel between selected properties for down-converting SrGd2O4 doped with Dy3+ ions (1 and 7 at%) and up-converting SrGd2O4 co-doped with variable amounts of Yb3+ ions (2 and 6 at%) and a constant amount of Ho3+ ions (1 at%). A parallel between the microstructural characteristics, photoluminescence intensity, and photocatalytic activity was studied. TEM investigation revealed the existence of porous agglomerated round-shaped nanostructures, independent of the dopant ions or their concentration in the matrix. EDS analysis established the presence and even distribution of all constituting elements. Luminescence emission was confirmed by the Dy3+ or Ho3+ peaks in the PL spectra, suggesting the material could be used as an efficient light source. The photocatalytic degradation of selected dyes demonstrated a significant reduction in dye concentration after only 4 h. The presented results undoubtedly point out that samples with higher luminescence intensity showed better photocatalytic activity, leading to the conclusion that new multifunctional materials were prepared with promising characteristics to be used in many different fields.

Author Contributions

T.S. Methodology, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization; V.L. Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia on the research program Grant No. 451-03-0136/2025-03/200017 (“Vinca” Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade).

Data Availability Statement

The research data will be available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lidija Mančić, Ivana Dinić and Marko Nikolić for PL measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hai, O.; Pei, M.; Yang, E.; Ren, Q.; Wu, X.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Du, L. Exploration of long afterglow luminescence materials work as round-the-clock photocatalysts. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 866, 158752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ren, G.; Han, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhao, J.; Meng, X.; Li, Z. Recent Advances of Photocatalytic Application in Water Treatment: A Review. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yuan, S.; Dai, L.; Xie, M.; Liu, J.; Peng, H. Modification optimization and application of graphitic carbon nitride in photocatalysis: Current progress and future prospects. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2024, 296, 120245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Emeline, A.V.; Kuznetsov, V.N.; Ryabchuk, V.K.; Serpone, N. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: Basic Approaches and Terminology. Photocatalysis 2013, 3, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ibhadon, A.O.; Fitzpatrick, P. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: Recent Advances and Applications. Catalysts 2013, 3, 189–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Divya, J.; Shivaramu, N.; Coetsee, E.; Kroon, R.; Purcell, W.; Swart, H. Enhanced luminescence and photocatalytic activity of Bi2O3:Ho3+ needles. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 842, 155641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kang, F.; Sun, G.; Boutinaud, P.; Wu, H.; Ma, F.-X.; Lu, J.; Gan, J.; Bian, H.; Gao, F.; Xiao, S. Recent advances and prospects of persistent luminescent materials as inner secondary self-luminous light source for photocatalytic applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 126099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Tao, Y.; Shen, L.; Xu, Z.; Bian, Z.; Li, H. Challenges of photocatalysis and their coping strategies. Chem. Catal. 2022, 2, 1315–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahmad, I. Inexpensive and quick photocatalytic activity of rare earth (Er, Yb) co-doped ZnO nanoparticles for degradation of methyl orange dye. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 227, 115726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, C.; Ran, W.; Du, P.; Li, W.; Luo, L.; Wang, D. Enhanced Visible Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activities and Photoluminescence Characteristics of BiOF Nanoparticles Determined via Doping Engineering. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 11801–11813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pickering, J.W.; Bhethanabotla, V.R.; Kuhn, J.N. Assessment of mechanisms for enhanced performance of TiO2/YAG:Yb+3,Er+3 composite photocatalysts for organic degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 202, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yao, X.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, D.; Lu, S.; Wang, M.; Pan, S.; Pu, X.; Liu, J.; Cai, P. Achieving improved full-spectrum responsive 0D/3D CuWO4/BiOBr:Yb3+,Er3+ photocatalyst with synergetic effects of up-conversion, photothermal effect and direct Z-scheme heterojunction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 644, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S.; Sayyar, Z. Rare-Earth-Based Materials for Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. Concepts Semicond. Photcatal. 2019, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reszczyńska, J.; Grzyb, T.; Wei, Z.; Klein, M.; Kowalska, E.; Ohtani, B.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Photocatalytic activity and luminescence properties of RE3+–TiO2 nanocrystals prepared by sol–gel and hydrothermal methods. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 181, 825–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Weber, A.S.; Grady, A.M.; Koodali, R.T. Lanthanide modified semiconductor photocatalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bünzli, J.C.G.; Eliseeva, S.V. Basics of Lanthanide Photophysics. In Lanthanide Luminescence. Springer Series on Fluorescence (Methods and Applications); Hänninen, P., Härmä, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Blasse, G.; Grabmaier, B.C. Luminescent Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wen, S.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, K.; Bednarkiewicz, A.; Liu, X.; Jin, D. Advances in highly doped upconversion nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, Y.; Shao, Q.; Deng, X.; Song, D.; Han, S.; Dong, Y.; Jiang, J. Thermally induced multicolor emissions of upconversion hybrids with large color shifts for anticounterfeiting applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 11770–11775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vetrone, F.; Naccache, R.; Zamarrón, A.; de la Fuente, A.J.; Sanz-Rodríguez, F.; Maestro, L.M.; Rodriguez, E.M.; Jaque, D.; Solé, J.G.; Capobianco, J.A. Temperature Sensing Using Fluorescent Nanothermometers. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3254–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gu, Z.; Yan, L.; Tian, G.; Li, S.; Chai, Z.; Zhao, Y. Recent Advances in Design and Fabrication of Upconversion Nanoparticles and Their Safe Theranostic Applications. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3758–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lojpur, V.; Nikolić, M.; Mančić, L.; Milošević, O.; Dramićanin, M. Up-conversion luminescence in Ho3+ and Tm3+ co-doped Y2O3:Yb3+ fine powders obtained through aerosol decomposition. Opt. Mater. 2012, 35, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Peng, L.; Liu, B.; Han, T. Preparation and upconversion luminescence of monodisperse Gd2O3:Ho3+,Yb3+ nanocrystals. J. Rare Earths 2013, 31, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, P.; Zhong, Z.; Jia, H.; Zhou, J.; Han, J.; Liu, X.; Qiu, J. Magnetic field enhanced upconversion luminescence and magnetic–optical hysteresis behaviors in NaYF4: Yb, Ho nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 7391–7395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Culubrk, S.; Lojpur, V.; Djordjevic, V. Dramicanin Annealing and doping concentration effects on Y2O3: Sm3+ nanopowder obtained by self-propagation room temperature reaction. Sci. Sinter. 2013, 45, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, J.; Manam, J. Effect of Y3+ on structural environment and luminescence characteristics of novel SrGd1.94-2x Eu0.06Y2xO4 phosphors for display and dosimetric applications. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 88, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Harini, G.; Balasurya, S.; Khan, S.S. Recent advances on gadolinium-based nano-photocatalysts for environmental remediation and clean energy production: Properties, fabrication, defect engineering and toxicity. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 345, 131139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ghorpade, S.P.; Kottam, N.; Melavanki, R.; Patil, N.R. Photoluminescence, TGA/DSC and photocatalytic activity studies of Dy3+ doped SrY2O4 nanophosphors. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 21049–21056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chang, M.; Song, Y.; Sheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Guan, H.; Shi, Z.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, K.; Zou, H. Photoluminescence and Photocatalysis Properties of Dual-Functional Eu3+-Doped Anatase Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 2369–2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumar, A.N.; Jnaneshwara, D.; Nagabhushana, H.; Pratapkumar, C.; Ravikumar, C.; Kumar, M.A.; Shekhar, T.S.; Prashantha, S. Photoluminescence, photocatalytic and electrochemical performance of La10Si6O27:Sm3+ nanophosphor: It’s applications in display, photocatalytic and electrochemical sensor. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021, 4, 100070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Akshhayya, C.; Okla, M.K.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Abdel-Maksoud, M.A.; AbdElgawad, H.; Das, A.; Khan, S.S. Construction of S-scheme heterojunction CuFe2O4/α-MnO2 with tuned bandgap for enhanced white light harvesting: Insights of photoluminescence, Raman scattering and photocatalysis. Surfaces Interfaces 2021, 27, 101523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, Y.; Qin, J.; Fan, Z.; Wei, D.; Seo, H.J. Photoenergy Conversion Behaviors of Photoluminescence and Photocatalysis in Silver-Coated LiBaPO4:Eu2+. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 13161–13169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wojcieszak, D.; Kaczmarek, D.; Domaradzki, J.; Mazur, M. Correlation of Photocatalysis and Photoluminescence Effect in Relation to the Surface Properties of TiO2:Tb Thin Films. Int. J. Photoenergy 2013, 2013, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Arppe, R.; Hyppänen, I.; Perälä, N.; Peltomaa, R.; Kaiser, M.; Würth, C.; Christ, S.; Resch-Genger, U.; Schäferling, M.; Soukka, T. Quenching of the upconversion luminescence of NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+and NaYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+nanophosphors by water: The role of the sensitizer Yb3+in non-radiative relaxation. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 11746–11757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Peng, Y.; Xu, L.; Peng, J.; Wang, T.; Wang, Q.; Li, Y.; Yin, Z.; Han, J.; Qiu, J.; Yang, Z.; et al. Enhanced upconversion luminescence in layered Bi2GdO4Cl:Yb3+/Er3+ by reducing OVs and its application in photocatalysis. J. Lumin 2022, 252, 119269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Basavaraju, N.; Prashantha, S.; Nagabhushana, H.; Pratapkumar, C.; Ravikumar, C.; Kumar, M.A.; Surendra, B.; Shekhar, T.S.; Premkumar, H.; Nagaswarupa, H. MgNb2O6:Dy3+ nanophosphor: A facile preparation, down conversion photoluminescence and UV driven photocatalytic properties. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 10370–10380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wei, D.; Fan, Z.; Huang, Y.; Seo, H.J. Particularly developed transition from the 5D1 level of Eu3+ and its significant contribution to the improved photocatalysis of (Bi3Li)O4Cl2via prolonging the decay time of the excited state. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 15717–15727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stamenković, T.; Radmilović, N.; Đorđević, M.P.; Rabasović, M.; Dinić, I.; Tomić, M.; Lojpur, V.; Mančić, L. Quantum yield and energy transfer in up-conversion SrGd2O4:Yb, Er nanoparticles obtained via sol-gel assisted combustion. J. Lumin 2022, 253, 119491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stamenković, T.; Dinić, I.; Tomić, M.; Mančić, L.; Lojpur, V. Quantum yield and thermal sensitivity of SrGd2O4:Yb, Tm up-conversion nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2024, 51, 16878–16886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Irtiqa, S.; Rahman, A. Photocatalytic and Photoluminescence Studies of La, Ce, and Dy Co-doped ZnO Nanoflowers. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. E 2022, 103, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reszczyńska, J.; Grzyb, T.; Sobczak, J.W.; Lisowski, W.; Gazda, M.; Ohtani, B.; Zaleska, A. Visible light activity of rare earth metal doped (Er3+, Yb3+ or Er3+/Yb3+) titania photocatalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 163, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yu, K.; Yang, S.; He, H.; Sun, C.; Gu, C.; Ju, Y. Visible Light-Driven Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B over NaBiO3: Pathways and Mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 10024–10032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Umrao, S.; Sharma, P.; Bansal, A.; Sinha, R.; Singh, R.K.; Srivastava, A. Multi-layered graphene quantum dots derived photodegradation mechanism of methylene blue. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 51790–51798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Low-magnification TEM micrographs of (a,c) SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%) and (b,d) SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%) taken at different magnifications.
Figure 1. Low-magnification TEM micrographs of (a,c) SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%) and (b,d) SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%) taken at different magnifications.
Catalysts 15 00522 g001
Figure 2. HR-TEM micrographs at high magnification with fitting FFT images as insights for (a) SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%) and (b) SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%).
Figure 2. HR-TEM micrographs at high magnification with fitting FFT images as insights for (a) SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%) and (b) SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%).
Catalysts 15 00522 g002
Figure 3. SAED patterns for (a) SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%) and (b) SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%).
Figure 3. SAED patterns for (a) SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%) and (b) SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%).
Catalysts 15 00522 g003
Figure 4. STEM-HAADF micrograph with EDS elemental mapping of all constituents of the SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%).
Figure 4. STEM-HAADF micrograph with EDS elemental mapping of all constituents of the SrGd2O4: Dy3+ (1 at%).
Catalysts 15 00522 g004
Figure 5. STEM-HAADF micrograph with EDS elemental mapping of all constituents of the SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%).
Figure 5. STEM-HAADF micrograph with EDS elemental mapping of all constituents of the SrGd2O4: Ho3+ (1 at%), Yb3+ (6 at%).
Catalysts 15 00522 g005
Figure 6. Emission spectra of (a) down-conversion Dy3+ (1 and 7 at%)-doped SrGd2O4 and (b) up-conversion Yb3+ (2 and 6 at%), Ho3+ (1 at%)-doped SrGd2O4.
Figure 6. Emission spectra of (a) down-conversion Dy3+ (1 and 7 at%)-doped SrGd2O4 and (b) up-conversion Yb3+ (2 and 6 at%), Ho3+ (1 at%)-doped SrGd2O4.
Catalysts 15 00522 g006
Figure 7. DRS spectra and Kubelka-Munk plots as insets for (a) SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Dy3+ and (b) SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Ho3+ and 6 at% Yb3+.
Figure 7. DRS spectra and Kubelka-Munk plots as insets for (a) SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Dy3+ and (b) SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Ho3+ and 6 at% Yb3+.
Catalysts 15 00522 g007
Figure 8. Comparative kinetic curves of photocatalytic degradation of (a) RB and (b) MB.
Figure 8. Comparative kinetic curves of photocatalytic degradation of (a) RB and (b) MB.
Catalysts 15 00522 g008
Figure 9. Pseudo-first-order kinetics for photocatalytic degradation of the dyes (a) RB for the sample SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% of Dy3+ and (b) MB for the sample SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Ho3+ and 6 at% Yb3+.
Figure 9. Pseudo-first-order kinetics for photocatalytic degradation of the dyes (a) RB for the sample SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% of Dy3+ and (b) MB for the sample SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Ho3+ and 6 at% Yb3+.
Catalysts 15 00522 g009
Figure 10. Changes in the UV-VIS spectra for the photocatalytic degradation of (a) 3 ppm RB with 20 mg SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Dy3+ and (b) 3 ppm MB with 20 mg SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Ho3+ and 6 at% Yb3+.
Figure 10. Changes in the UV-VIS spectra for the photocatalytic degradation of (a) 3 ppm RB with 20 mg SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Dy3+ and (b) 3 ppm MB with 20 mg SrGd2O4 doped with 1 at% Ho3+ and 6 at% Yb3+.
Catalysts 15 00522 g010
Figure 11. Schematic presentation of the sol-gel combustion synthesis for the preparation of down- and up-conversion luminescent materials.
Figure 11. Schematic presentation of the sol-gel combustion synthesis for the preparation of down- and up-conversion luminescent materials.
Catalysts 15 00522 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stamenković, T.; Lojpur, V. Correlation of the Microstructural, Chemical, Luminescent, and Photocatalytic Properties of SrGd2O4 Doped with Rare Earth Ions. Catalysts 2025, 15, 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15060522

AMA Style

Stamenković T, Lojpur V. Correlation of the Microstructural, Chemical, Luminescent, and Photocatalytic Properties of SrGd2O4 Doped with Rare Earth Ions. Catalysts. 2025; 15(6):522. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15060522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stamenković, Tijana, and Vesna Lojpur. 2025. "Correlation of the Microstructural, Chemical, Luminescent, and Photocatalytic Properties of SrGd2O4 Doped with Rare Earth Ions" Catalysts 15, no. 6: 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15060522

APA Style

Stamenković, T., & Lojpur, V. (2025). Correlation of the Microstructural, Chemical, Luminescent, and Photocatalytic Properties of SrGd2O4 Doped with Rare Earth Ions. Catalysts, 15(6), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15060522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop