Next Article in Journal
Phenolic Acid Decarboxylase for Carbon Dioxide Fixation: Mining, Biochemical Characterization, and Regioselective Enzymatic β-carboxylation of para-hydroxystyrene Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of the Full Hydrolysis of Babassu Oil by Combi-Lipases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Engineering Amorphous CoNiRuOx Nanoparticles Grown on Nickel Foam for Boosted Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

1
Key Laboratory of Pico Electron Microscopy of Hainan Province, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Ni&Co Associated Minerals Resources Development and Comprehensive Utilization, Jinchang 737101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Catalysts 2025, 15(3), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030211
Submission received: 25 January 2025 / Revised: 17 February 2025 / Accepted: 20 February 2025 / Published: 22 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Electrocatalysis)

Abstract

:
Designing efficient and cost-effective electrocatalysts is crucial for the large-scale development of sustainable hydrogen energy. Amorphous catalysts hold great promise for application due to their structural flexibility and high exposure of active sites. We report a novel method for the in situ growth of amorphous CoNiRuOx nanoparticle structures (CoNiRuOx/NF) on a nickel foam substrate. In 1 m KOH, CoNiRuOx/NF achieves a current density of 10 mA/cm2 with a hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) overpotential of only 43 mV and remains stable for over 100 h at a current density of 100 mA/cm2. An alkaline electrolyzer assembled with CoNiRuOx/NF as the cathode delivers a current density 2.97 times higher than that of an IrO2||Pt/C electrode pair at the potential of 2 V and exhibits excellent long-term durability exceeding 100 h. Experimental results reveal that the combined replacement and corrosion reactions facilitate the formation of the amorphous CoNiRuOx structure. This work provides valuable insights for developing efficient and scalable amorphous catalysts.

1. Introduction

The gradual depletion of fossil fuels and negative environmental impact have driven the search for cleaner and more sustainable energy solutions [1,2,3]. Among various potential alternatives, hydrogen (H2) has garnered significant attention due to its high energy density and carbon-free emissions [4,5,6]. Water electrolysis is considered as one of the most promising hydrogen production pathways because of its environmental friendliness and compatibility with renewable energy [7,8,9,10]. However, the large-scale production and application of H2 face numerous challenges, including improving the energy conversion efficiency of water electrolysis and reducing system costs [11,12]. The core issue lies in developing cost-effective and efficient electrocatalysts to simultaneously optimize the reaction kinetics of the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) during water splitting [13,14,15]. Currently, noble metals such as Pt and IrO2/RuO2 are benchmarks in the field of electrocatalysis due to their outstanding performance in HER and OER [16,17,18,19], respectively. However, the scarcity and high cost of noble metals pose significant barriers to the large-scale application of water electrolysis technology [20,21,22,23]. Therefore, developing high-performance catalytic materials with low cost is one of the critical steps for advancing water electrolysis technology.
Among various research directions, amorphous catalysts have attracted widespread attention due to their unique structural advantages [24,25]. Amorphous catalysts have atomic arrangements with short-range order, rich in dangling bonds and unique coordination structures, which often exhibit superior catalytic performance compared to their crystalline analogues [26,27,28,29]. Currently, many studies on amorphous catalytic materials have been reported [30,31,32]. For example, Dai et al. addressed the limitations of the smooth and densely stacked layered structure of crystalline Co−MOF by controlling the degree of crystallization in the synthesized electrode materials through ball milling, exfoliation, and adjusting the Fe doping levels. This approach transformed the crystalline Co−MOF into a defect-rich amorphous Fe@Co−MOF [33]. This catalyst demonstrated an HER overpotential of 150 mV at a current density of 10 mA/cm² in an alkaline electrolyte. In addition, Zhao et al. utilized a wet chemical method to etch Zn@Ni−P nanowires (NWs) with axial screw dislocations in an alkaline solution [34]. This process removed the Zn core of the Zn@Ni−P NWs and partially converted Ni into amorphous Ni(OH)₂, forming amorphous Ni−P/Ni(OH)2 nanotubes (Ni−P/Ni(OH)2 NTs). The Ni−P/Ni(OH)2 NTs exhibited an HER overpotential of 54.7 mV at a current density of 10 mA/cm2 in 1 m KOH. Considering the advantages of amorphous structures as electrocatalytic materials, we were motivated to explore new methods for synthesizing amorphous structures and further construct amorphous structures with novel compositions.
Herein, we successfully synthesized an amorphous CoNiRuOx nanoparticle structure (CoNiRuOx/NF) via combining replacement reaction and corrosion engineering. The CoNiRuOx/NF exhibits superb HER performance, requiring an overpotential of only 43 mV to achieve a current density of 10 mA/cm2 and maintaining stability for over 100 h at 100 mA/cm2. Moreover, an alkaline electrolyzer assembled with CoNiRuOx/NF as the cathode achieves a current density of 100 mA/cm2 at a voltage of only 1.73 V, and its current density at 2 V is 2.97 times higher than that of the IrO2||Pt/C electrode pair. Based on experimental results, we reasonably propose a reaction mechanism in which the driving force of the replacement reaction (the transition of Ru3+ to its metallic state) and the driving force of the corrosion reaction (heterogeneous nucleation of Ni2+ and Co3+) work together to form the amorphous CoNiRuOx structure. This study not only expands the preparation methods for amorphous materials but also designs a novel amorphous structure composition, providing a new pathway for developing efficient and stable electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution.

2. Results and Discussion

The CoNiRuOx/NF is synthesized through a one-step impregnation method (The detailed process is provided in the Section 3). Figures S1 and S2 shows the optimized Ru concentration and reaction time. The optical micrograph in Figure S3 reveals that CoNiRuOx/NF retains the three-dimensional interconnected framework structure of the nickel foam (NF), which facilitates the rapid flow of electrolytes and efficient hydrogen release [35]. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images (Figure 1a) demonstrate that CoNiRuOx/NF exhibits a nanoparticle morphology, and the corresponding particle size distribution shows that the particle size of the nanoparticles is 15–20 nm (Figure 1a inset). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images further support this conclusion (Figure 1b). High–resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR−TEM) did not observe any lattice fringes (Figure 1c), indicating that the CoNiRuOx grown on the NF is likely to be an amorphous structure [27]. This feature is further confirmed by selected area electron diffraction (SAED) (Figure 1c inset), where weak diffraction rings are observed near the central bright spot [36,37]. Meanwhile, the corresponding energy-dispersive X–ray spectroscopy (EDS) confirms that the Co, Ni, Ru, and O elements are uniformly distributed on the CoNiRuOx/NF surface (Figure 1d), and the elemental contents of Co, Ni, Ru, and O are calculated to be 11.91%, 2.22%, 32.54%, and 53.33%, respectively. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP−OES) indicates that the metal Ru loading per unit area is approximately 2.64 mg/cm2.
To clarify the structural information of the CoNiRuOx/NF, two comparative samples were synthesized by directly immersing NF into solutions of CoCl2·6H2O and RuCl3·xH2O, respectively, with other conditions consistent with those for CoNiRuOx/NF (synthesis details are provided in the Section 3). The SEM results (Figure 2a,b) show that Co/NF exhibits a nanosheet array structure with a lateral size of approximately 200 nm, whereas Ru/NF displays a nanoparticle morphology with particle sizes around 20 nm. Raman spectroscopy results (Figure 2c) indicate that Co/NF exhibits characteristic peaks around 465 and 525 cm−1, which are attributed to the A1g symmetric stretching and bending vibration modes of NiCo hydroxide [38]. Considering that Co2+ cannot undergo a replacement reaction with NF, combined with TEM results, lattice spacings of 0.193 nm, 0.203 nm, and 0.238 nm can be attributed to the (018), (107), and (104) facets of CoNi−LDH (Figure S4) [39], respectively. Hence, the main component of Co/NF can be identified as CoNi−LDH. Additionally, both Ru/NF and CoNiRuOx/NF exhibit weak Raman peaks near 465 cm−1. Considering that Ru3+ can carry out a replacement reaction with NF to generate Ru0 and Ni2+, the Raman peak near 465 cm−1 in Ru/NF is attributed to Ni–O species, while the corresponding peak in CoNiRuOx/NF may arise from the bonding of Ni−O/Co−O [40].
Regarding the analysis of the valence states, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results (Figure 2d,e) reveal that the Co 2p spectrum of Co/NF shows the fitting peaks near 780.8 and 796.4 eV corresponding to the 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 of Co3+, and the fitting peaks located at 782.9 and 797.9 eV match the 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 of Co2+ [20], respectively. Additionally, the fitting peaks for the 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 of Ni2+ are identified at 855.6 and 873.3 eV in the Ni 2p spectrum [41], respectively. The above results indicate the coexistence of Co3+, Co2+, and Ni2+, which further supports the presence of the CoNi−LDH structure. For CoNiRuOx/NF, the oxidation states of Co are similar to those in Co/NF. However, CoNiRuOx/NF shows weaker fitting peak intensities for Co2+, Co3+, and Ni2+ compared to Co/NF, indicating that the introduction of Ru reduces the relative content of Co2+ and Ni2+. This is consistent with the trend of decreased intensity of the M−O peaks in the Raman spectrum, suggesting that the introduction of Ru alters the interaction between the metal and oxygen. From the Ru 3p spectrum (Figure 2f), the fitting peaks at 462.4 and 484.6 eV for Ru/NF correspond to the 3p1/2 and 3p3/2 of Ru0, while those at 466.3 and 488.6 eV are ascribed to the 3p1/2 and 3p3/2 of Rux⁺ [42]. Compared to Ru/NF, the fitting peaks in CoNiRuOx/NF (463.5 eV and 485.7 eV) shift toward higher binding energies, indicating a higher oxidation state of Ru in CoNiRuOx/NF. Additionally, the elemental ratio of Co to Ru is determined to be 1:2.84 based on XPS results, further clarifying the elemental composition of the amorphous CoNiRuOx.
Based on the above experimental results, the synthesis mechanism of CoNiRuOx/NF is further speculated. First, when the NF is immersed in a solution containing dissolved oxygen (O2), an oxygen corrosion reaction would occur on the NF, resulting in the generation of Ni2+ and OH [43]. This reaction process can be described by Equation (1). Additionally, the Co2+ in the solution can also be oxidized to Co3+ by dissolved oxygen, as described by Equation (2) [44]. For Co/NF, the generated Co3+ will combine with the Ni2+ released from the corrosion reaction, as well as with OH and CO32− in the solution to form [Ni2+1-xCo3+x(OH)2]x+[(CO32−)x/2·yH2O] (Equation (3)), which corresponds to the CoNi−LDH structure. For Ru/NF, due to the difference in standard electrode potentials between Ru3+ and Ni2+ (E0(Ru3+/Ru0) > E0(Ni2+/Ni0)), the replacement reaction can occur spontaneously [45]. The NF will reduce Ru3+ to metallic Ru while itself being oxidized to Ni2+, as shown in Equation (4). As for the CoNiRuOx/NF, considering that both the oxygen corrosion reaction and the replacement reaction may occur in the solution containing Ru3+ and Co2+, this suggests that Ru3+ near the NF tends to be reduced to its metallic state (driving force of the replacement reaction), and Ni2+, Co3+, and OH should simultaneously exist in the surrounding environment (driving force of the corrosion reaction). The source of Ni2+ is from both the substitution reaction and the corrosion reaction, while the presence of Cl in the system can accelerate the corrosion process [46]. Under the combination of these two reactions, we can infer that during the transformation of Ru3+ to its metallic state, a heterogeneous nucleation process of Ni2+ and Co3+ occurs simultaneously, ultimately leading to the formation of the thermodynamically stable CoNiRuOx catalytic structure on the NF.
2Ni + O2 + 2H2O → 2Ni2+ + 4OH
4Co2+ +O2 + 2H2O → 4Co3+ + 4OH
Ni2+ + Co3+ + OH + CO32− → [Ni2+1-xCo3+x (OH)2]x+[(CO32−)x/2·yH2O]
3Ni + 2Ru3+ → 3Ni2+ + 2Ru
The HER performance of CoNiRuOx/NF was evaluated via a standard three-electrode system in 1 m KOH. The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves in Figure 3a show that CoNiRuOx/NF achieves a current density of 10 mA/cm2 at a low overpotential of only 43 mV, which outperforms Ru/NF (82 mV), Co/NF (235 mV), and NF (274 mV) and is second only to Pt/C (27 mV). The Tafel slope was used to further investigate the reaction kinetics of the catalysts. As shown in Figure 3b, the Tafel slope of CoNiRuOx/NF is 49.2 mV dec−1, which is significantly lower than that of Ru/NF (72.6 mV dec−1), Co/NF (105.8 mV dec−1), and NF (131.5 mV dec−1) and is close to that of Pt/C (43.0 mV dec−1). This indicates that CoNiRuOx/NF possesses faster reaction kinetics and superior electron transfer efficiency. Additionally, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results in Figure S5 reveal that CoNiRuOx/NF has a smaller charge transfer resistance compared to the Ru/NF, Co/NF, and NF, further confirming its ultrafast electron transfer rate.
We further compared the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) and intrinsic activities of these materials. The ECSA of the catalyst was first evaluated through the double-layer capacitance (Cdl). Accordingly, the ECSA of CoNiRuOx/NF is approximately 3.1, 6.7, and 9.2 times that of Ru/NF, Co/NF, and NF, respectively (Figure S6). This reveals that the abundant atomic disorder of CoNiRuOx/NF facilitates the exposure of catalytic active sites, further confirming the superiority of the amorphous structure in enhancing catalytic performance. The comparison of intrinsic activities in Figure 3c shows that the intrinsic activity of CoNiRuOx/NF at an overpotential of 100 mV (η = 100 mV) is 0.25 mA/cm2, which is higher than that of Ru/NF (0.19 mA/cm2), Co/NF (0.04 mA/cm2), and NF (0.03 mA/cm2), demonstrating the excellent inherent catalytic activity of CoNiRuOx/NF. At a potential of 0.043 V (vs. RHE), the turnover frequency (TOF) of CoNiRuOx/NF was further determined to be 0.001 s⁻1. In addition, we compared CoNiRuOx/NF with many previously reported Ru-based catalysts (Figure 3d and Table S1), and CoNiRuOx/NF exhibits the best HER catalytic activity among them.
The stability of CoNiRuOx/NF was evaluated using a chronopotentiometry curve (V–t). As shown in Figure 3e, CoNiRuOx/NF operated continuously for over 100 h at a current density of 100 mA/cm² with negligible current decay, demonstrating its outstanding resistance to deactivation. Characterization of CoNiRuOx/NF after the stability test via SEM and XPS revealed that it retained its original nanoparticle morphology (Figure S7), and the valence states of the constituent elements Ru, Co, and Ni remained unchanged (Figure S8). However, based on the elemental ratio analysis from XPS, the Co:Ru ratio in the CoNiRuOx/NF after the stability test was found to be 1:1.03, indicating partial Ru leaching during the catalytic process. This may be due to the relatively weaker bonding in the amorphous structure compared to the crystalline phase. To further explore the industrial application potential of CoNiRuOx/NF, an alkaline flow electrolyzer was assembled using CoNiRuOx/NF as the cathode and an OER electrode prepared by our research group (NiFe−LDH) as the anode, and then the couple was designated as NiFe−LDH||CoNiRuOx/NF. For comparison, another electrode pair was assembled using Pt/C as the cathode and IrO2 as the anode (IrO2||Pt/C), and the activity tests were conducted under the same alkaline flow electrolyzer conditions. The LSV results (Figure S9) show that NiFe−LDH||CoNiRuOx/NF required a voltage of only 1.73 V to deliver a current density of 100 mA/cm2, which is lower than the voltage needed by IrO2||Pt/C to achieve the same current density (1.88 V). The V–t curve results (Figure S10) indicate that NiFe−LDH||CoNiRuOx/NF also demonstrated stable operation for over 100 h at 100 mA/cm2, further confirming its superb stability and broad application prospects for large–scale hydrogen production.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Ni foam (NF, thickness: 1 mm) was purchased from Kunshan Guangjiayuan new material Co., Ltd. (Kunshan, China). Ruthenium (III) chloride hydrate (RuCl3·xH2O, 99.99%), potassium hydroxide (KOH, 95%), and iridium dioxide (IrO2, 99.9%) were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Cobalt chloride hexahydrate (CoCl2·6H2O, AR) and Nafion 117 solution (5%) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Isopropyl alcohol (C3H8O, AR) and hydrochloric acid (HCl, AR) were purchased from Xilong Chemical Factory (Shantou, China). Deionized water (>18 MΩ cm resistivity) was produced by a Water Purification System of Heal Force (Shanghai, China).

3.2. Synthesis of CoNiRuOx/NF

CoNiRuOx/NF was synthesized via a simple impregnation process. First, a nickel foam (NF) substrate (3 cm × 3 cm) was ultrasonically cleaned for 5 min in 6 m HCl, ethanol, and deionized water to remove potential oxide layers on the surface. Subsequently, the cleaned NF was immersed in a solution containing 0.3 mg/mL RuCl3·xH2O and 3 mg/mL CoCl2·6H2O at room temperature (~25 °C) for 3 h to obtain the amorphous CoNiRuOx/NF structure. Additionally, we adjusted the concentration of RuCl3·xH2O (0.1 mg/mL, 0.2 mg/mL, 0.4 mg/mL) and the reaction time (1 h, 5 h) to obtain electrode materials, and the corresponding catalytic activities are provided in Figures S1 and S2.

3.3. Synthesis of Ru/NF

The preparation process of Ru/NF is similar to that of CoNiRuOx/NF, with the only difference being the absence of CoCl2·6H2O in the reaction solution.

3.4. Synthesis of Co/NF

The preparation process of Co/NF is similar to that of CoNiRuOx/NF, with the only difference being the absence of RuCl3·xH2O in the reaction solution.

3.5. Preparation of NiFe-LDH, Pt/C, and IrO2 Electrodes

NiFe–LDH was prepared based on a modified corrosion method [13]. First, a clean NF (3 cm × 4 cm) was immersed in a 0.1 m FeCl2·4H2O solution, acting as the cathode, while a stainless-steel mesh served as the anode. Under stirring conditions at 500 r/min, a constant current of 0.6 A was applied for 2 min to perform electrochemical deposition. The material was then removed and immersed in a 0.1 m NiSO4·6H2O solution, followed by heating in a water bath at 80 °C for 3 h to obtain the NiFe–LDH electrode.
Next, 4 mg of Pt/C catalyst was dispersed in a solution containing 760 μL of isopropanol and 40 μL of Nafion, then it was stirred for 30 min to obtain a homogeneous solution. Then, 200 μL of the solution was dropped onto a 1 cm × 1 cm NF substrate and air-dried at room temperature for 12 h to obtain a Pt/C catalyst with a loading of approximately 1.0 mg/cm2. The preparation of IrO2 follows a similar procedure, except that Pt/C was replaced by IrO2.

3.6. Characterization

The optical microscopy imaging was performed on an optical microscope (MA2001, Chongqing, China). The microscopic topographies of the samples were characterized via field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, HITACHI S–4800, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 F20, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The elemental valence states of the samples were obtained from X–ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo SCIENTIFIC Nexsa, Hillsboro, OR, USA). All the XPS spectra have been calibrated by the binding energy of C1s at 284.8 eV. The Raman spectra were collected via a laser Raman spectrometer (Renishaw Invia, London, UK) with an excitation source of a 514 nm laser. The element content of the samples was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP–OES, Agilent 5110, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

3.7. Electrochemical Measurements

All electrochemical measurements were carried out at a standard three-electrode system on the German Zahner electrochemical workstations. The as–prepared materials (1 cm × 1 cm), carbon rod, and Hg/HgO were used as the working electrodes, counter electrode, and reference electrode, respectively. All measured potentials versus Hg/HgO were calibrated to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) according to the Nernst equation (ERHE = EHg/HgO + 0.098 + 0.059 × pH). All polarization curves were conducted over linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) with a scan rate of 2 mV/s and dealt with 95% iR drop unless otherwise mentioned. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was collected at a frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz with an amplitude of 10 mV. The electrochemical double-layer capacitance (Cdl) was calculated via cyclic voltammetry (CV) within a potential range of −0.1 V to 0 V at a scan rate range of 20 to 100 mV/s, and the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) value was calculated according to the formula ECSA = Cdl/Cs, where Cs is 40 μF/cm2.
Turnover frequency (TOF) was calculated using the equation TOF = (J × A)/(2 × F × n), where the J, A, F, and n refer to the current density (10 mA/cm2) at a given overpotential (0.043 V), geometric surface area of the work electrode (1 cm2), Faradaic constant (96,485 C mol−1), and mole numbers of metal in the electrode (3.7 × 10−5 mol), respectively.
The alkaline flow electrolyzer uses NiFe-LDH as the anode and CoNiRuOx/NF as the cathode, and the membrane is ZF-500. The loading amount of IrO2 and Pt/C on nickel foam was set at 1 mg/cm², and the electrode working area was 1 cm2. The electrolyzer was carried on 1 m KOH at a flow rate of 17 mL/min at a temperature of 25 °C. LSV measurements were conducted on a potential range of 1–2 V with a scan rate of 5 mV/s without iR compensation. The stability of the alkaline flow electrolyzer was assessed by applying a constant current density of 50 mA/cm2 for 100 h without iR compensation.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a simple and easily scalable method is proposed to construct CoNiRuOx nanostructures in situ grown on NF with high disorder (CoNiRuOx/NF). The optimized CoNiRuOx/NF demonstrates excellent catalytic activity for HER in 1 m KOH, with an overpotential mere 43 mV at a current density of 10 mA/cm2 and maintains stability more than 100 h at 100 mA/cm2. Furthermore, the assembled NiFe–LDH||CoNiRuOx/NF alkaline electrolyzer can deliver a current density of 100 mA/cm2 at a voltage of only 1.73 V, and its current density is 2.97 times higher than that of the IrO2||Pt/C electrode pair at 2 V. Systematic experimental results indicate that the formation of the amorphous CoNiRuOx structure involves the combined effects of replacement and corrosion reaction. Specifically, the transition of Ru3+ to its metallic state (driving force of replacement reaction) and the heterogeneous nucleation of Ni2+ and Co3+ (driving force of corrosion reaction) occur simultaneously on the NF surface, resulting in the formation of the amorphous CoNiRuOx structure. This work not only expands the synthesis methods for amorphous materials but also constructs a new composition of amorphous structures, offering a new direction for the development of efficient and scalable electrocatalytic materials.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal15030211/s1, Figure S1: Polarization curves of CoNiRuOx/NF in different Ru3+ concentration with 95% iR-drop. Figure S2: Polarization curves of CoNiRuOx/NF in different reaction time with 95% iR-drop. Figure S3: Optical microscopy image of CoNiRuOx/NF. Figure S4: TEM image of Co/NF. Figure S5: Nyquist plots of NF, Ru/NF, CoNiRuOx/NF, and Pt/C, respectively. Figure S6: The double layer capacitance of NF, Co/NF, Ru/NF, and CoNiRuOx/NF, respectively. Figure S7: SEM images of CoNiRuOx/NF after 100 h stability test in 1 m KOH. Figure S8: (a) Co 2p, (b) Ni 2p, and (c) Ru 3p spectrum of CoNiRuOx/NF after 100 h stability test in 1 m KOH. Figure S9: Polarization curves of NiFe-LDH||CoNiRuOx/NF and IrO2||Pt/C couple in 1 m KOH. Figure S10: Chronopotentiometric curves of NiFe-LDH||CoNiRuOx/NF couple in 1 m KOH. Table S1: Comparison of HER performance among the CoNiRuOx/NF catalyst and other recently reported Ru-based HER electrocatalysts in 1 m KOH. Refs. [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57] is cited in Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Data curation: X.S. and Q.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, X.S., Q.Y. and Q.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.L., J.M. and S.L.; supervision, Y.L., J.M. and S.L.; project administration, S.L.; funding acquisition, Y.L., J.M. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22369003), Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 223QN185), Scientific Research Starting Foundation of Hainan University (Grant No. KYQD(ZR)-22022), and the Hainan Provincial Innovative Research Project of Postgraduates (No. Qhys2023-174, Qhyb2024-56, Qhyb2023-173).

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Zhang, X.; Tong, L.; Shi, X.; Li, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Lin, S. Tailoring atomically local electric field of NiFe layered double hydroxides with Ag dopants to boost oxygen evolution kinetics. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 668, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, J.; Duan, S.; Shi, H.; Wang, T.; Yang, X.; Huang, Y.; Wu, G.; Li, Q. Rationally Designing Efficient Electrocatalysts for Direct Seawater Splitting: Challenges, Achievements, and Promises. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202210753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tiwari, J.N.; Harzandi, A.M.; Ha, M.; Sultan, S.; Myung, C.W.; Park, H.J.; Kim, D.Y.; Thangavel, P.; Singh, A.N.; Sharma, P.; et al. High-Performance Hydrogen Evolution by Ru Single Atoms and Nitrided-Ru Nanoparticles Implanted on N-Doped Graphitic Sheet. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wei, X.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Dang, L.; Zhang, K.; Guo, Q.; Li, W.; Ai, T.; Wang, S. Bimetallic RuCo anchored CoFe2O4 nanosheets to realize in-depth electronic modulation for boosted structural reconstruction and efficient seawater electrolysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 503, 158346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qiang, S.; Li, Z.; He, S.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, X.; Yuan, A.; Zou, J.; Wu, J.; Qiao, Y. Modulating electronic structure of CoS2 nanorods by Fe doping for efficient electrocatalytic overall water splitting. Nano Energy 2025, 134, 110564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sarkar, B.; Barman, B.K.; Parui, A.; Singh, A.K.; Nanda, K.K. Combinatorial modulation to augment the all-round HER activity of a Ru–CrN catalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 8291–8301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, W.; Wei, W.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Dong, S.; Cui, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, R.; Ostrikov, K.; et al. Tunable Built-In Electric Field in Ru Nanoclusters-Based Electrocatalyst Boosts Water Splitting and Simulated Seawater Electrolysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2310690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Xing, L.; Liu, Y.; Lian, D.; Chen, M.; Zhang, W.; Wu, K.; Zhu, H.; Sun, Z.; Chen, W.; et al. Strain regulation of bond length in single Ru sites via curving support surface for enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2024, 353, 124088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dao, H.T.; Hoa, V.H.; Sidra, S.; Mai, M.; Zharnikov, M.; Kim, D.H. Dual efficiency enhancement in overall water splitting with defect-rich and Ru atom-doped NiFe LDH nanosheets on NiCo2O4 nanowires. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 485, 150054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rajan, H.; Anantharaj, S.; Kim, J.-K.; Ko, M.J.; Yi, S.C. Strategically designed trimetallic catalyst with minimal Ru addresses both water dissociation and hydride poisoning barriers in alkaline HER. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 16084–16092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jose, V.; Do, V.-H.; Prabhu, P.; Peng, C.-K.; Chen, S.-Y.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, Y.-G.; Lee, J.-M. Activating Amorphous Ru Metallenes Through Co Integration for Enhanced Water Electrolysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2301119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ramaprakash, M.; Nasrin Banu, G.; Neppolian, B.; Sengeni, A. An advanced Ru-based alkaline HER electrocatalyst benefiting from Volmer-step promoting 5d and 3d co-catalysts. Dalton Trans. 2024, 53, 7596–7604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Y.; Liang, X.; Gu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G.-D.; Zou, X.; Chen, J.-S. Corrosion engineering towards efficient oxygen evolution electrodes with stable catalytic activity for over 6000 hours. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, X.; Wu, T.; Li, N.; Zhang, S.; Chang, W.; Chi, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, L. Vertically Staggered Porous Ni2P/Fe2P Nanosheets with Trace Ru Doping as Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Alkaline Seawater Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2400734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mahmood, J.; Li, F.; Jung, S.-M.; Okyay, M.S.; Ahmad, I.; Kim, S.-J.; Park, N.; Jeong, H.Y.; Baek, J.-B. An efficient and pH-universal ruthenium-based catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, Y.; Fan, K.; Hsu, C.-S.; Chen, G.; Chen, C.; Liu, T.; Lin, Z.; She, S.; Li, L.; Zhou, H.; et al. Supported Ruthenium Single-Atom and Clustered Catalysts Outperform Benchmark Pt for Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2301133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tian, W.; Xie, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Ding, J.; Liu, Y.; Lu, S. Synergistic Interfacial Effect of Ru/Co3O4 Heterojunctions for Boosting Overall Water Splitting. Small 2024, 20, 2309633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maiti, A.; Srivastava, S.K. Ru-Doped CuO/MoS2 Nanostructures as Bifunctional Water-Splitting Electrocatalysts in Alkaline Media. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 7675–7685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cherevko, S.; Geiger, S.; Kasian, O.; Kulyk, N.; Grote, J.-P.; Savan, A.; Shrestha, B.R.; Merzlikin, S.; Breitbach, B.; Ludwig, A.; et al. Oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions on Ru, RuO2, Ir, and IrO2 thin film electrodes in acidic and alkaline electrolytes: A comparative study on activity and stability. Catal. Today 2016, 262, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shi, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, B.; Lv, S.; Wang, T.; Liu, X. Tuning electronic structure of CoNi LDHs via surface Fe doping for achieving effective oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 565, 150506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wen, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Xing, C.; Lyu, X.; Cai, W.; Wang, W.; Li, Y. Cr-Dopant Induced Breaking of Scaling Relations in CoFe Layered Double Hydroxides for Improvement of Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Small 2019, 15, 1902373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, Q.; Jin, H.; Xia, F.; Xu, H.; Zhu, J.; Qin, R.; Bai, H.; Shuai, B.; Huang, W.; Chen, D.; et al. Ultralow Ru-assisted and vanadium-doped flower-like CoP/Ni2P heterostructure for efficient water splitting in alkali and seawater. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 26852–26860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Creus, J.; Drouet, S.; Suriñach, S.; Lecante, P.; Collière, V.; Poteau, R.; Philippot, K.; García-Antón, J.; Sala, X. Ligand-Capped Ru Nanoparticles as Efficient Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11094–11102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kang, J.; Yang, X.; Hu, Q.; Cai, Z.; Liu, L.-M.; Guo, L. Recent Progress of Amorphous Nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 8859–8941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singh, M.; Cha, D.C.; Singh, T.I.; Maibam, A.; Paudel, D.R.; Nam, D.H.; Kim, T.H.; Yoo, S.; Lee, S. A critical review on amorphous–crystalline heterostructured electrocatalysts for efficient water splitting. Mater. Chem. Front. 2023, 7, 6254–6280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jia, B.; Liu, G.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, J.; Yin, K.; Lin, J.; Han, C.; Fan, X.; Xu, M.; Ye, L. General Modification Strategy on Amorphous Materials to Boost Catalytic Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2405867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, D.; Chen, D.; Zhu, J.; Mu, S. Ultralow Ru Incorporated Amorphous Cobalt-Based Oxides for High-Current-Density Overall Water Splitting in Alkaline and Seawater Media. Small 2021, 17, 2102777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Anantharaj, S.; Noda, S. Amorphous Catalysts and Electrochemical Water Splitting: An Untold Story of Harmony. Small 2020, 16, 1905779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dhandapani, H.N.; Madhu, R.; De, A.; Salem, M.A.; Ramesh Babu, B.; Kundu, S. Tuning the Surface Electronic Structure of Amorphous NiWO4 by Doping Fe as an Electrocatalyst for OER. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 11817–11828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lyu, C.; Dai, C.; Tan, Y. Amorphous hybrid tungsten oxide–nickel hydroxide nanosheets used as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Res. 2024, 17, 2499–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, G.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, H.M.; Hu, Z.; Hung, S.-F.; Ma, N.; Dai, J.; Lin, H.-J.; Chen, C.-T.; Zhou, W.; et al. An Amorphous Nickel–Iron-Based Electrocatalyst with Unusual Local Structures for Ultrafast Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1900883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yi, L.; Zhang, Y.; Nie, K.; Li, B.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Huang, W. Recent advances in the engineering and electrochemical applications of amorphous-based nanomaterials: A comprehensive review. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 501, 215569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dai, S.; Liu, Y.; Mei, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, K.; Li, Y.; Jin, N.; Wang, X.; Luo, H.; Li, W. Iron-doped novel Co-based metal–organic frameworks for preparation of bifunctional catalysts with an amorphous structure for OER/HER in alkaline solution. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 15446–15457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhao, F.; Liu, H.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, L.; Li, W.; Chen, H. Amorphous/amorphous Ni–P/Ni(OH)2 heterostructure nanotubes for an efficient alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 10169–10179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chaudhari, N.K.; Jin, H.; Kim, B.; Lee, K. Nanostructured materials on 3D nickel foam as electrocatalysts for water splitting. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 12231–12247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; Si, R.; Li, G.-D.; Li, W.; Liu, D.-P.; Wang, D.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, X. Coupling Sub-Nanometric Copper Clusters with Quasi-Amorphous Cobalt Sulfide Yields Efficient and Robust Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, N.; Cheng, H.; Liu, X.; Yun, Q.; Chen, Y.; Li, B.; Chen, B.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, X.; Lu, Q.; et al. Amorphous/Crystalline Hetero-Phase Pd Nanosheets: One-Pot Synthesis and Highly Selective Hydrogenation Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1803234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gao, M.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wu, S.; Cai, K. Nickel-cobalt (oxy)hydroxide battery-type supercapacitor electrode with high mass loading. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, S.; Chen, J.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, Z.; He, H.; Luo, S.; Xie, A. High catalytic performance of nano-flowered Mg-doped NiCo layered double hydroxides for the oxygen evolution reaction. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 19491–19500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, W.; Dun, C.; Yu, C.; Song, X.; Yang, F.; Kuang, W.; Xie, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Yu, J.; et al. Mismatching integration-enabled strains and defects engineering in LDH microstructure for high-rate and long-life charge storage. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.S.; Kang, J.F.; Chen, B.; Gao, B.; Liu, L.F.; Liu, X.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wu, L.; Yu, H.Y.; Wang, J.Y.; et al. Microscopic mechanism for unipolar resistive switching behaviour of nickel oxides. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2012, 45, 065303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cui, X.; Shyshkanov, S.; Nguyen, T.N.; Chidambaram, A.; Fei, Z.; Stylianou, K.C.; Dyson, P.J. CO2 Methanation via Amino Alcohol Relay Molecules Employing a Ruthenium Nanoparticle/Metal Organic Framework Catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 16371–16375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhao, W.; Xu, H.; Luan, H.; Chen, N.; Gong, P.; Yao, K.; Shen, Y.; Shao, Y. NiFe Layered Double Hydroxides Grown on a Corrosion-Cell Cathode for Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2102372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, Z.-H.; Yu, Z.-R.; Zhang, Y.; Barras, A.; Addad, A.; Roussel, P.; Tang, L.-C.; Naushad, M.; Szunerits, S.; Boukherroub, R. Construction of desert rose flower-shaped NiFe LDH-Ni3S2 heterostructures via seawater corrosion engineering for efficient water-urea splitting and seawater utilization. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 19578–19590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xiao, X.; Wang, X.; Jiang, X.; Song, S.; Huang, D.; Yu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, M.; Shen, Y.; et al. In Situ Growth of Ru Nanoparticles on (Fe,Ni)(OH)2 to Boost Hydrogen Evolution Activity at High Current Density in Alkaline Media. Small Methods 2020, 4, 1900796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Yang, G.; Dong, C.; He, M. Unraveling the Dynamic Reconstruction of Active Co(IV)-O Sites on Ultrathin Amorphous Cobalt-Iron Hydroxide Nanosheets for Efficient Oxygen-Evolving. Small 2024, 20, 2404205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Eaimsumang, S.; Wongkasemjit, S.; Pongstabodee, S.; Smith, S.M.; Ratanawilai, S.; Chollacoop, N.; Luengnaruemitchai, A. Effect of synthesis time on morphology of CeO2 nanoparticles and Au/CeO2 and their activity in oxidative steam reforming of methanol. J. Rare Earths 2019, 37, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, J.; Fang, W.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Dang, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, B.; Zhao, H.; Li, Z. Single atom Ru doping 2H-MoS2 as highly efficient hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalyst in a wide pH range. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 298, 120490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Song, H.; Wu, M.; Tang, Z.; Tse, J.S.; Yang, B.; Lu, S. Single Atom Ruthenium-Doped CoP/CDs Nanosheets via Splicing of Carbon-Dots for Robust Hydrogen Production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7234–7244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. He, Q.; Tian, D.; Jiang, H.; Cao, D.; Wei, S.; Liu, D.; Song, P.; Lin, Y.; Song, L. Achieving Efficient Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution Reaction over a Ni5P4 Catalyst Incorporating Single-Atomic Ru Sites. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1906972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xing, L.; Gao, H.; Hai, G.; Tao, Z.; Zhao, J.; Jia, D.; Chen, X.; Han, M.; Hong, S.; Zheng, L.; et al. Atomically dispersed ruthenium sites on whisker-like secondary microstructure of porous carbon host toward highly efficient hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 3203–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pu, Z.; Amiinu, I.S.; Kou, Z.; Li, W.; Mu, S. RuP(2) -Based Catalysts with Platinum-like Activity and Higher Durability for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction at All pH Values. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11559–11564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xue, Y.; Yan, Q.; Bai, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhu, K.; Ye, K.; Yan, J.; Cao, D.; et al. Ruthenium-nickel-cobalt alloy nanoparticles embedded in hollow carbon microtubes as a bifunctional mosaic catalyst for overall water splitting. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 612, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, K.; Zhou, J.; Sun, M.; Lin, F.; Huang, B.; Lv, F.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, Q.; Gu, L.; Luo, M.; et al. Cu-Doped Heterointerfaced Ru/RuSe2 Nanosheets with Optimized H and H2O Adsorption Boost Hydrogen Evolution Catalysis. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2300980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. He, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Shou, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, P.; Xu, W.; Qiao, S.; Wu, C.; Liu, H.; Liu, D.; et al. Synergic Reaction Kinetics over Adjacent Ruthenium Sites for Superb Hydrogen Generation in Alkaline Media. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2110604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, Y.; Xu, S.; Zheng, X.; Lu, Y.; Li, D.; Jiang, D. Ru-doping modulated cobalt phosphide nanoarrays as efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution rection. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 625, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qu, M.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, M.; Liu, S.; Guo, Q.; Shen, W.; Li, M.; He, R. Regulating electron density of NiFe-P nanosheets electrocatalysts by a trifle of Ru for high-efficient overall water splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 263, 118324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) SEM images of CoNiRuOx/NF. Inset: The particle size distribution of CoNiRuOx/NF. (b) TEM and (c) HRTEM images of CoNiRuOx/NF. Inset: The SAED pattern of CoNiRuOx/NF. (d) HAADF-STEM and corresponding EDS mapping images of CoNiRuOx/NF.
Figure 1. (a) SEM images of CoNiRuOx/NF. Inset: The particle size distribution of CoNiRuOx/NF. (b) TEM and (c) HRTEM images of CoNiRuOx/NF. Inset: The SAED pattern of CoNiRuOx/NF. (d) HAADF-STEM and corresponding EDS mapping images of CoNiRuOx/NF.
Catalysts 15 00211 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Co/NF and (b) Ru/NF. (c) Raman spectra of Co/NF, Ru/NF, and CoNiRuOx/NF. (d) Co 2p and (e) Ni 2p spectra of Co/NF and CoNiRuOx/NF. (f) Ru 3p spectra of Ru/NF and CoNiRuOx/NF.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Co/NF and (b) Ru/NF. (c) Raman spectra of Co/NF, Ru/NF, and CoNiRuOx/NF. (d) Co 2p and (e) Ni 2p spectra of Co/NF and CoNiRuOx/NF. (f) Ru 3p spectra of Ru/NF and CoNiRuOx/NF.
Catalysts 15 00211 g002
Figure 3. (a) Polarization curves with 95% iR correction, (b) corresponding Tafel plots, and (c) comparison of ECSA–normalized specific activities. (d) Performance comparison of CoNiRuOx/NF with reported catalysts at 10 mA/cm2 current density in 1 m KOH. (e) Chronopotentiometric curve of CoNiRuOx/NF.
Figure 3. (a) Polarization curves with 95% iR correction, (b) corresponding Tafel plots, and (c) comparison of ECSA–normalized specific activities. (d) Performance comparison of CoNiRuOx/NF with reported catalysts at 10 mA/cm2 current density in 1 m KOH. (e) Chronopotentiometric curve of CoNiRuOx/NF.
Catalysts 15 00211 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, X.; Ye, Q.; Huang, Q.; Ma, J.; Liu, Y.; Lin, S. Engineering Amorphous CoNiRuOx Nanoparticles Grown on Nickel Foam for Boosted Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Catalysts 2025, 15, 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030211

AMA Style

Shi X, Ye Q, Huang Q, Ma J, Liu Y, Lin S. Engineering Amorphous CoNiRuOx Nanoparticles Grown on Nickel Foam for Boosted Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Catalysts. 2025; 15(3):211. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Xiahui, Qitong Ye, Quanbin Huang, Junhu Ma, Yipu Liu, and Shiwei Lin. 2025. "Engineering Amorphous CoNiRuOx Nanoparticles Grown on Nickel Foam for Boosted Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution" Catalysts 15, no. 3: 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030211

APA Style

Shi, X., Ye, Q., Huang, Q., Ma, J., Liu, Y., & Lin, S. (2025). Engineering Amorphous CoNiRuOx Nanoparticles Grown on Nickel Foam for Boosted Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Catalysts, 15(3), 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030211

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop