Next Article in Journal
Degradation of Bisphenols by Air Micro-Nano Bubbles Activated Persulfate
Previous Article in Journal
Engineered Covalent Organic Frameworks with Green Future for Environmentally Sustainable Production of Hydrogen Peroxide: A Critical Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ultrasound/Peracetic Acid Degradation of Sunset Yellow FCF: Scavenger-Mapped Radical Pathways and the Impact of Salts and Environmental Water Matrices

by
Abdulmajeed Baker
,
Oualid Hamdaoui
*,
Lahssen El Blidi
,
Mohamed K. Hadj-Kali
and
Abdulaziz Alghyamah
Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2025, 15(11), 1044; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111044
Submission received: 1 October 2025 / Revised: 28 October 2025 / Accepted: 30 October 2025 / Published: 3 November 2025

Abstract

The ability of ultrasound/peracetic acid (US/PAA) to degrade the azo dye Sunset Yellow FCF (SSY) was evaluated considering the impacts of power, pH, inorganic carbon, common salts, radical scavengers, and real water matrices. Pseudo-first-order rate constants revealed synergy indices of 2.90, 3.28, 2.22, and 2.03 at electrical powers of 40, 60, 80, and 100 W, respectively. Selective scavenger assays revealed a mixed radical regime. OH radical involvement was confirmed by inhibition with alcohols (tert-butanol, 2-propanol), benzoic acid, nitrobenzene, sodium azide, and phenol, while suppression by TEMPO highlighted the key role of PAA-derived acyl and peroxyl radicals. Nitrobenzene caused pronounced inhibition at elevated doses, while nitrite acted as a decisive quencher by converting OH and other oxidants into less reactive species. Carbonate alkalinity exerted dual effects: at acidic pH (3.7–4.4) it diverted OH radicals to carbonate radicals and reduced cavitation through dissolved CO2, whereas at near-neutral pH it buffered conditions toward the optimum (pH 9) and enhanced degradation. Common anions (chloride, sulfate, nitrate) at ≤10 mM produced minor effects. Tests in environmental waters revealed the following reactivity order: seawater > ultrapure water > tap water ≈ Zamzam water > tertiary effluent. Enhanced performance in seawater was attributed to halide-mediated formation of reactive chlorine and bromine species, while inhibition in effluent was linked to organic matter scavenging. Overall, US/PAA emerges as a robust and adaptable advanced oxidation process for azo dye abatement across diverse water matrices.

1. Introduction

Azo dyes are a major class of synthetic colorants in aquatic systems because they are highly visible, structurally diverse, and resistant to conventional treatment. Sunset Yellow FCF (SSY) (Figure 1) is one of the most widely used azo dyes in food, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products. Its persistence and transformation chemistry require robust physicochemical treatment strategies [1]. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are attractive because they generate short-lived oxidants such as OH radicals, reactive halogen species, and carbon-centered radicals that can degrade azo chromophores and auxiliary groups with limited residuals [2].
Ultrasound (US)-driven AOPs rely on acoustic cavitation. Bubble collapse produces localized hot spots that generate OH radicals and secondary oxidants. The yield depends on frequency, gas content, ionic strength, and interfacial chemistry [3]. High-frequency ultrasound favors chemical effects and enhances interfacial radical fluxes. Peracetic acid (PAA, pKa 8.2) is a versatile oxidant that decomposes to benign products and can be activated by light, heat, transition metals, carbon materials, or ultrasound [4,5]. PAA activation produces OH and organic acyl or peroxyl radicals that complement each other across a wide pH and matrix range [4,5,6].
Matrix composition strongly influences AOP performance. In halide-rich waters, OH radicals are converted into reactive chlorine and bromine species that oxidize azo bonds [7,8]. Carbonate alkalinity diverts OH radicals to carbonate radicals (CO3•−) with different selectivity [9,10]. Dissolved organic matter competes for oxidants and reduces process rates [11]. Ionic strength and salts can alter cavitation and radical formation [12]. These interactions highlight the need to clarify oxidant pathways and matrix sensitivities in ultrasound-activated PAA systems.
This study investigates the degradation of SSY via US/PAA at 425 kHz. Selective scavengers are used to identify oxidant species. SSY degradation was then mapped across a range of pH values, and the combined effects of bicarbonate and carbonate were quantified, including the influence of pH drift. The impact of common salts (Cl, NO3, and SO42−) was assessed, with particular attention to nitrite as a potent OH quencher. Finally, the performance of the US/PAA system was compared across various environmental water matrices, i.e., seawater, tap water, Zamzam water, and tertiary effluent. The aim is to map radical pathways and quantify matrix sensitivity for SSY abatement under standardized conditions.
This work provides the first systematic mechanistic assessment of US/PAA under high-frequency conditions, demonstrating the coexistence of hydroxyl and PAA-derived organic radicals, the dual role of carbonate alkalinity, and the process robustness across diverse water matrices.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synergistic US/PAA Process

Figure 2a illustrates the degradation of SSY through the use of PAA alone, ultrasonication alone, or the US/PAA process at various power levels. The experiments were conducted with 5 mg/L of SSY, 5 mM of PAA, and pH 3.3. The profiles show three distinct regimes. PAA alone leaves SSY essentially unchanged for 270 min, which is consistent with its limited direct reactivity toward many dyes. Ultrasonication alone yields power-dependent decay; faster losses occur at 60–100 W than at 40 W, reflecting greater cavitation activity and OH production as acoustic energy increases. Combining ultrasonication with PAA accelerates the decolorization process beyond what is achieved with ultrasonication alone at the same power level. The 100 W US/PAA run achieves complete decolorization, suggesting a synergistic radical budget. High-frequency ultrasound generates OH (and other short-lived oxidants) at the bubble–liquid interface. Meanwhile, cavitation and radical attack fragment PAA into acyl/acetyl- (per)oxyl species (CH3C(O)O and CH3C(O)OO). Together, these processes expand the oxidant pool and sustain rapid SSY oxidation. After 90 min, the US/PAA treatment achieved SSY removal percentages of 54.9%, 76.5%, 79.7%, and 88.2% at powers of 40, 60, 80, and 100 W, respectively. These percentages are higher than the 4.5% achieved with PAA alone and the 33.6%, 44.0%, 54.7%, and 66.0% achieved with ultrasonication alone at the same powers.
The concentration-time profiles (Figure 2a) were well described by pseudo-first-order kinetics (ln(C/C0) = −k·t). The corresponding rate constants (Figure 2b) yielded synergy indices of 2.90, 3.28, 2.22, and 2.03 at electrical powers of 40, 60, 80, and 100 W, respectively. These values demonstrate pronounced but power-dependent synergy, with the highest enhancement observed at intermediate power levels.

2.2. Scavenger-Probed Radical Pathways

Eight pathway-selective scavengers were applied to identify the dominant oxidant species within the US/PAA system: ascorbic acid (AA), tert-butanol (t-BuOH), 2-propanol (2-PrOH), nitrobenzene (NB), benzoic acid (BA), sodium azide (NaN3), phenol (Ph), and 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO).
In all quenching tests, t-BuOH and 2-PrOH are used as OH scavengers (near-diffusion-controlled with OH). NB and BA also react rapidly with OH and serve as diagnostic OH probes. Ph quenches OH. NaN3 is used as a physical quencher of singlet oxygen (1O2) and also as a fast OH scavenger. AA acts as a broad one-electron reductant, rapidly reducing OH and reacting with peroxyl radicals. TEMPO selectively traps carbon-centered, alkoxyl (RO), and peroxyl (ROO) radicals formed during PAA activation under ultrasonication.
Figure 3a illustrates the impact of AA on the degradation of SSY via the US/PAA process at 425 kHz and 100 W (pH 3.3). The time courses demonstrate strong, dose-dependent inhibition of SSY removal when AA is added to the US/PAA system. Without AA, SSY decays rapidly. Adding 1 mM AA markedly slows the decay, and adding 10 mM AA nearly suppresses it over the full reaction window. This behavior suggests that the process is governed by short-lived radicals that AA efficiently intercepts, rather than by direct, two-electron oxidation by intact PAA. In control tests with 5 mM PAA at pH 3.3, SSY removal was negligible with an initial dye concentration of 5 mg/L (Figure 2a). These results suggest that inactivated PAA is an ineffective two-electron oxidant for this dye and must be activated to be effective. At high ultrasonic frequency (425 kHz), the cavitation chemical pathway is maximized. Bubble collapse generates OH/H2O2 from water sonolysis, creating a hot interfacial zone where solutes react. At the same time, PAA undergoes homolysis/pyrolysis in or near the bubbles, yielding acyloxy (CH3C(O)O) and acetylperoxyl (CH3C(O)OO) radicals, as well as some OH. This provides a mixed radical field that explains the rapid baseline removal without a scavenger.
AA is a broad-spectrum radical scavenger. It reacts with the hydroxyl radical at the diffusion limit (k ≈ 1 × 1010 M−1·s−1 [13]) and rapidly converts oxidants into the resonance-stabilized ascorbyl radical. AA also reduces alkyl and acetyl peroxyl radicals in water, with k-values ranging from 105 to 106 M−1·s−1 [14]. Thus, mM AA effectively competes with SSY for both OH and peroxyl-type species, accounting for the progressive flattening of the SSY decay as AA concentration increases. At pH 3.3, PAA (pKa = 8.2) is largely undissociated, favoring its uptake into or near cavitation bubbles and the production of radicals during collapse. Meanwhile, AA (pKa1 ≈ 4.1–4.2) is predominantly in its protonated form. However, it still scavenges OH as quickly as its anion. Together, these speciation effects explain the strong sensitivity to AA observed here.
Overall, Figure 3a clearly shows that SSY abatement in US/PAA at 425 kHz and pH 3.3 predominantly occurs via radical pathways. The strong quenching by AA, which reacts with OH at k ≈ 1 × 1010 M−1·s−1 [13] and with peroxyl-type radicals at k ≈ 105–106 M−1·s−1 [14] in a concentration-dependent manner, coupled with the high radical productivity of high-frequency cavitation and the homolysis of PAA into acyl/peroxyl species coherently explains the observed kinetics.
Figure 3b shows how t-BuOH affects the degradation of SSY via the US/PAA process under conditions identical to those for AA. Adding t-BuOH slows SSY decay in a concentration-dependent manner. The 1 mM trace exhibits a notable reduction in degradation rate, while the 10 mM trace further decreases the rate, achieving substantial conversion within 270 min. Since t-BuOH reacts rapidly with hydroxyl radicals (k = 108–109 M−1·s−1 [13]) and slowly with other radicals, the graded inhibition is consistent with a system in which OH significantly contributes to pollutant loss yet is not the sole oxidant. The persistence of degradation at high concentrations of t-BuOH indicates an additional oxidant pool that t-BuOH does not efficiently quench. Under 425 kHz ultrasonication, PAA undergoes homolysis/pyrolysis to form acyloxy and acetyl-peroxyl species. Therefore, SSY’s resilience in the presence of t-BuOH is consistent with a mixed-radical regime involving OH and PAA-derived organic radicals, which is characteristic of US-activated PAA. An additional nuance is that t-BuOH is not an inert sink. When the hydroxyl radical is scavenged, the tert-butyl radical is formed. This radical quickly combines with oxygen (O2) to form the tert-butyl peroxyl radical (t-BuOO) [15]. This secondary peroxyl radical is far less reactive than the hydroxyl radical. However, it is longer-lived and can engage in redox chemistry. This helps explain why suppression is incomplete, even at 10 mM t-BuOH. Taken together, these findings suggest that SSY degradation in US/PAA occurs through two parallel pathways: one dominated by t-BuOH-sensitive OH chemistry and one dominated by PAA-derived acyl/peroxyl radicals. The monotonic decrease in destruction rate with t-BuOH supports the contribution of OH. Meanwhile, the non-zero rates at 10 mM imply that organic radicals carry a significant share of the oxidation under 425 kHz ultrasonication.
Figure 4a illustrates that adding 2-PrOH suppresses SSY degradation in the US/PAA system in a dose-dependent manner. Compared to the scavenger-free run, 1 mM of 2-PrOH decreases the degradation rate, and 10 mM produces a significant additional slowdown. However, removal is not abolished over 270 min. This kinetic profile is consistent with competition for OH radicals at near-diffusion-controlled rates (k•OH+2-PrOH = 2–3 × 109 M−1·s−1 [13]). The chemistry of the 2-PrOH probe further substantiates the OH pathway. The reaction of OH with 2-PrOH predominantly occurs via hydrogen abstraction from the α-C–H bond, yielding the α-hydroxyisopropyl radical. In aerated aqueous media, this radical readily converts to acetone. Yet complete quenching is not observed at 10 mM, reinforcing the presence of non-OH oxidants. Within the US/PAA matrix, those oxidants are plausibly PAA-derived acyl/peroxyl species formed at cavitation interfaces, which are less susceptible to interception by simple alcohols than OH.
Figure 4b shows that the addition of NB inhibits the abatement of SSY by the US/PAA system in a clear, concentration-dependent way. 0.1 mM NB significantly decreases the destruction rate, and 1 mM NB further decreases the removal rate though it does not stop it entirely over 270 min. NB is a well-established OH probe because it reacts with OH at k•OH+NB = 3.9 × 109 M−1·s−1 [13] to form hydroxycyclohexadienyl adducts that rapidly add O2. The comparatively stronger inhibition of NB, evident at concentrations as low as 0.1 mM, can be explained by spatial effects in sonochemistry. Due to its low solubility and moderate hydrophobicity (log Kow = 1.85–1.9, with a solubility of 1.9 g/L at 20 °C), NB accumulates at the bubble-liquid interface. This interface is the primary zone of radical formation at high frequency. Together with NB’s high k•OH+NB value, this interfacial enrichment explains why relatively low NB concentration captures a large fraction of the radical flux. Importantly, even at 1 mM, NB does not abolish SSY degradation, implying that oxidants other than OH significantly contribute to US/PAA degradation. This residual activity is consistent with growing evidence that PAA activation yields organic acyl/peroxyl species that NB intercepts less efficiently than classic OH scavengers/reductants. However, these species remain reactive toward many aromatics via hydrogen-atom transfer or addition.
Adding BA to the US/PAA system impedes SSY removal in a clear, dose-dependent fashion (Figure 5a). 1 mM of BA substantially reduces the degradation rate, and 10 mM of BA depresses the rate further. However, degradation persists for over 270 min. BA is a canonical OH probe because OH adds to the aromatic ring at near-diffusion-controlled rates (k•OH+BA = 1.8 × 109 M−1·s−1 [13]) to yield hydroxybenzoic acids. The graded inhibition in Figure 5a indicates a significant contribution of OH to SSY abatement under these conditions. At pH 3.3, BA (pKa = 4.20) is predominantly protonated (90%), and the neutral form exhibits moderate hydrophobicity (log Kow = 1.9). These features favor enrichment at the bubble–liquid interface, increasing the likelihood that BA will intercept interfacial OH before it can diffuse into the bulk solution. Even so, SSY degradation does not vanish at 10 mM BA, signaling BA-resistant oxidants, again consistent with acyl/peroxyl radicals from PAA activation under ultrasonication.
As shown in Figure 5b, the presence of NaN3 impedes the ability of the US/PAA system to remove SSY. Compared to the scavenger-free run, 0.1 mM azide slightly reduces the decay rate, while 1 mM azide significantly slows it down. Nevertheless, SSY substantially decays over the full reaction window. Azide is a potent physical quencher of singlet oxygen (1O2) with k1O2+N3− ≈ 108–109 M−1 s−1 [16] and reacts extremely rapidly with hydroxyl radicals, converting OH to the azidyl radical (N3) with k•OH+N3− = 1010 M−1·s−1 [13]. Thus, the observed suppression incorporates contributions from both 1O2 quenching and OH scavenging. Two mechanistic factors explain the incomplete quenching. First, PAA-derived organic radicals, such as CH3C(O)O and CH3C(O)OO. However, azide does not efficiently intercept these radicals. Consequently, these radicals continue to oxidize SSY when OH/1O2 are partially suppressed. Second, the azidyl radical (N3), a one-electron oxidant that can oxidize aromatic substrates. The formation of N3 provides a compensatory pathway that sustains a slower yet non-zero SSY conversion rate in azide runs. At pH 3.3, azide mainly exists as the neutral hydrazoic acid (HN3) (pKa = 4.65). HN3 more readily partitions into hydrophobic interfacial regions of cavitation bubbles. This favors the efficient interception of short-lived species and helps explain the inhibition at 1 mM.
Ph (0.1–1 mM) markedly slows SSY decay via US/PAA technique (Figure 6a). This is expected because OH adds electrophilically to Ph at near-diffusion-controlled rates (k•OH+Ph = 109 M−1·s−1 [13]), forming dihydroxycyclohexadienyl intermediates. At pH 3.3, Ph (pKa = 9.95) exists almost entirely as the neutral molecule and exhibits moderate hydrophobicity (log Kow = 1.5), so it preferentially resides at the bubble–liquid interface and efficiently intercepts interfacial OH under 425 kHz ultrasonication. The non-zero removal at 1 mM again indicates an additional, Ph-resistant oxidant pool consistent with PAA-derived acyl/peroxyl radicals under ultrasonication activation.
Adding the persistent nitroxide TEMPO suppressed SSY decay in a concentration-responsive behavior (Figure 6b). Complete decolorization was observed in the absence of TEMPO. Meanwhile, 0.1 mM of TEMPO substantially slowed the process, and 1 mM limited the decline to a modest decrease over 270 min. This behavior is expected because TEMPO efficiently scavenges organic radicals, particularly carbon-centered and peroxyl/alkoxyl species. This forms stable oxoammonium or oxoalkoxyamine products [17]. Alkyl radicals are scavenged by TEMPO at diffusion-limited rates, with rate constants around 1–3 × 1010 M−1·s−1 [17]. This diverts the mixed-radical flux that drives US/PAA. The pronounced suppression observed in the presence of TEMPO provides independent evidence that ultrasonic activation of PAA yields organic acyl and peroxyl radicals (e.g., CH3C(O)O, CH3C(O)OO) in addition to OH. Thus, the pronounced sensitivity to TEMPO, which far exceeds that expected from OH quenching alone, suggests that PAA-derived organic radicals substantially contribute to the system. Two ancillary interactions further rationalize the trends. First, TEMPO reacts rapidly with oxygen-centered radicals, including OH, RO, and ROO. Thus, part of the kinetic penalty reflects the increased demand for OH beyond what is measured with alcohol probes. Second, peracids, such as PAA, can oxidize TEMPO to its oxoammonium form, forming the basis of Anelli/TEMPO and related oxidations. This side reaction consumes oxidant and competes with radical pathways. This is consistent with stronger inhibition at 1 mM TEMPO. Together, these mechanisms explain the steep, monotonic decrease in degradation rate as TEMPO concentration increases.
The slowdowns and incomplete quenching observed across all probes are dose-dependent and converge on a mixed-radical regime in US/PAA at 425 kHz. This regime features a prominent interfacial OH pathway, as revealed by AA, t-BuOH, 2-PrOH, BA, NB, and Ph. This pathway operates alongside a PAA-derived acyl/peroxyl pathway. The acyl/peroxyl pathway remains active in the presence of classic hydroxyl traps as confirmed by TEMPO. High-frequency cavitation provides interfacial hot zones and OH radicals. At pH 3.3, PAA remains largely undissociated and migrates to these zones, where it breaks down into acyloxy and acetyl-peroxyl radicals.

2.3. Humic Acid Impact

Figure 7 shows that adding humic acid (HA, 5–15 mg/L) to the US/PAA system progressively decreases SSY removal. The destruction rate decreases monotonically with HA concentration. However, degradation is not abolished within 270 min. This dose-dependent inhibition is the expected kinetic behavior of natural organic matter (NOM) competing with the target for short-lived oxidants. In AOPs, NOM acts as a potent sink for reactive oxygen species, particularly the OH radical. This diverts the radical flux away from contaminant and lowers the observed rates. Humic and fulvic substances react rapidly with OH through addition to aromatic moieties and abstraction of hydrogen from aliphatic sites. Consequently, even a few mg/L of HA can capture a substantial fraction of the OH produced in advanced oxidation, depressing pollutant decay rates as observed. In addition to OH radical, NOM interacts with non-hydroxyl oxidants (CH3C(O)OO and CH3C(O)O). These species are competent oxidants for many micropollutants. NOM can be scavenged and transformed by these species, altering process selectivity. Therefore, the attenuation observed with HA is consistent with competition for a mixed radical field (OH plus PAA-derived organic radicals). HA contains hydrophobic and amphiphilic domains, causing it to accumulate at bubble–liquid interfaces and behave like a natural surfactant. This interfacial enrichment increases the probability that HA will intercept freshly formed radicals, which can modify bubble dynamics such as coalescence and interfacial film stability. This reduces the effective radical availability further. These physicochemical features explain the strong baseline reactivity and its suppression when HA is added. HA/NOM often inhibits ultrasonic solute degradation by scavenging radicals and, in some cases, by altering cavitation behavior.
Even at the highest HA level, SSY continues to decay, implying that oxidants not efficiently quenched by HA remain operative. This emphasizes the importance of carbon-centered and peroxyl radicals. These species are generally less affected by classic OH scavengers than OH itself. This explains the non-zero rates observed at elevated HA levels. Figure 7 shows that a mixed-radical regime exists in US/PAA at 425 kHz. In this regime, NOM strongly competes for OH, and PAA-derived organic radicals facilitate slower but significant oxidation under NOM-rich conditions.
Since surface water and wastewater usually contain 2–10 mg/L of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the form of NOM, the extent of inhibition observed with 5–15 mg/L of HA is operationally significant. Mechanistic guidance documents for AOPs recommend quantifying matrix scavenging when transitioning from clean water to real matrices. The HA experiment results from this study calibrate US/PAA and underscore the importance of tailoring energy and oxidant inputs or pre-reducing NOM to maintain performance.

2.4. Salts Impact

Figure 8a–c show how incorporating Na2SO4, NaCl, and KNO3 affects SSY degradation using the US/PAA treatment. Across all three panels, adding 1–10 mM of each salt had minimal effects on SSY removal rates. The decay curves largely overlapped with the salt-free control, showing only a slight slowdown at early times with 10 mM sulfate. These results suggest that the physical and chemical effects of salts do not significantly reduce the oxidant flux that governs SSY reduction at these ionic strengths. Ultrasonication at 425 kHz produces abundant OH radicals at the bubble–liquid interface. PAA fragmentation also supplies acyl/acetyl-peroxyl radicals. Together, these sources appear robust in the presence of 1–10 mM background ions.
Chloride can intercept OH to form reactive chlorine species (RCS) via the well-established reaction OH + Cl → ClOH•− (k•OH+Cl− = 4 × 109 M−1 s−1 [13]). This reaction is followed by conversion to Cl2•− in the presence of excess Cl. Nevertheless, Cl2•− remains a competent oxidant toward many organics (typical k = 107–109 M−1 s−1). Therefore, diverting part of the OH flux into RCSs does not significantly reduce the decay of pollutants at low chloride concentrations. This is consistent with the nearly identical NaCl traces. Additionally, US/PAA generates organic radicals from PAA that chloride does not efficiently quench, further stabilizing performance.
Nitrate is a much weaker OH sink than chloride (k•OH+NO3− = 107 M−1 s−1 [13]), and it does not readily form highly reactive secondary radicals under these conditions. At 1–10 mM, its competition with organics for OH is modest. This explains why the kinetics with KNO3 remain practically unchanged.
Sulfate/bisulfate reacts with OH at a rate of 107–108 M−1·s−1 to yield SO4•− [13], a selective one-electron oxidant. However, two countervailing effects likely minimize the net impact. First, at these concentrations, the scavenging by SO42−/HSO4 only modestly competes with the sinks of pollutants. Second, the formed SO4•− still oxidizes organics, partially compensating for any loss of OH. The slightly larger slowdown with Na2SO4 (10 mM) compared to NaCl/KNO3 is reasonable because Na2SO4 increases ionic strength by about threefold (I = 0.03 M at 10 mM), which can alter cavitation dynamics and interfacial chemistry subtly at 425 kHz.
Electrolytes can influence sonochemistry by salting out (enhancing the interfacial concentrations of hydrophobes) and by altering cavitation (e.g., gas solubility, surface tension, and bubble stability). Nevertheless, low-to-moderate concentration levels generally produce minor, pollutant-dependent effects. Enhancements or inhibitions mainly emerge at much higher salinities or when specific ions introduce new reactive pathways. The small differences among the three salts align with this broader picture.
The near-insensitivity of US/PAA to 1–10 mM sulfate, chloride, or nitrate suggests a mixed-radical regime dominated by interfacial OH from high-frequency cavitation and PAA-derived organic radicals (acetyl/peroxyl) that are comparatively resistant to anion scavenging.
Figure 9 illustrates the effect of NaNO2 on SSY removal via the US/PAA process. The nitrite exhibits strong, concentration-dependent inhibition of SSY degradation. In the additive-free control, C/C0 rapidly approaches zero by the end of ultrasonication. However, adding 1 mM NaNO2 markedly slows the decay, and adding 10 mM NaNO2 nearly stops it entirely. After 270 min, C/C0 reaches ≥0.75. This behavior is consistent with nitrite being an exceptionally fast OH radical scavenger, with a rate constant of k•OH+NO2− = 1.0 × 1010 M−1·s−1 [13]. The pH of 3.3 is close to the pKa of nitrous acid (HNO2). Therefore, NO2 and HNO2 coexist and efficiently intercept OH to produce NO2. NO2 is a much less reactive and more selective oxidant than OH. Together, these kinetic and speciation factors explain the pronounced inhibition at higher nitrite concentrations. PAA generates additional acetylperoxyl radicals (CH3CO3) through ultrasonication. Thus, the strong nitrite effect suggests that SSY decay predominantly occurs through an OH-mediated route in US/PAA. Once OH is scavenged, the remaining PAA-derived radicals are insufficient to sustain rapid removal.
Figure 10a shows that introducing NaHCO3 slows the degradation of SSY in proportion to the dosage. Note that the experiment with 1 mM NaHCO3 starts at pH 3.8 and ends at pH 3.2, while the experiment with 10 mM NaHCO3 starts at pH 5.7 and ends at pH 5.2. Under these acidic conditions, the speciation of the carbonate system is dominated by dissolved CO2(aq)/H2CO3 (pKa1 = 6.35; pKa2 = 10.33). A simple calculation shows that the effective HCO3 concentration available to scavenge radicals is only ~0.3–0.07% of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) for the 1 mM case (2.8–0.7 mM). However, this value is much larger, ranging from 18% to 6.6% for the 10 mM case (1.8 to 0.66 µM). CO32− is negligible at pH 5–6. Consequently, the dominant inhibition pathway is the interception of OH by HCO3 to form the CO3•− radical. The rate constant for this reaction is k•OH+HCO3− = 8.5 × 106 M−1·s−1 [13]. The resulting CO3•− is an oxidant, albeit weaker and more selective (E° = 1.6–1.8 V vs. NHE). Thus, channeling flux through CO3•− lowers the SSY decay rate. The stronger, sustained inhibition at 10 mM NaHCO3 aligns with this speciation-kinetics picture. Additionally, even small sinks measurably reduce steady-state levels of OH in sonochemical microenvironments where it is locally generated and has a short lifespan. At low pH, added DIC shifts towards dissolved CO2, and CO2-rich bubble atmospheres lower the collapse temperature/pressure, thereby reducing radical production. This explains the modest but consistent slowdown, even at 1 mM NaHCO3.
SSY removal exhibits a pronounced optimum around pH 9 (Figure 10b). This is consistent with PAA speciation (pKa = 8.2). Near and slightly above this pH level, significant amounts of the peracetate anion (CH3C(O)OO) are present, making them more easily activated into acetyl/peracetyl radicals with energy input, while cavitation supplies OH. Together, these pathways maximize the mixed-radical flux. At pH 11, removal remains rapid, though slower than at pH 9, which is consistent with base-catalyzed PAA decomposition shortening the oxidant’s lifetime at higher pH. At the acidic end, both pH 1 and 3.3 demonstrate fast kinetics (much faster than at pH 5–7). Two effects rationalize this phenomenon. First, greater PAA stability at low pH levels sustains its availability for ultrasound activation. Second, the protonation of azo dyes at strongly acidic pH levels increases the azo/auxochromic system’s susceptibility to one-electron oxidation and subsequent bond cleavage. This synergizes with cavitation, OH, and PAA-derived radicals. In contrast, pH 5 is the slowest condition because the solution is well below the PAA pKa, as expected. Thus, peracetate-driven activation is minimal and slower than at pH 9 and 7. However, it is not acidic enough to benefit from azo-group protonation or PAA’s higher intrinsic stability. This yields the lowest effective radical budget. At pH 7, the rate improves relative to pH 5 as peracetate begins to contribute. Nevertheless, it lags behind the pH 9 optimum. The overall ordering reflects the competition between PAA speciation/activation, pH-dependent PAA stability, and the effects of substrate (SSY) protonation under high-frequency ultrasound. The ordering is as follows: pH 9 > 1 > 11 > 3.3 > 7 > 5.
Both bicarbonate series were modestly acidified (1 mM pH 3.8–3.2 and 10 mM pH 5.7–5.2). This is consistent with PAA hydrolysis/decomposition yielding acetic acid (and H2O2/O2), which gradually lowers the pH of open, dilute systems. This slow acidification shifts the carbonate equilibrium further toward CO2/H2CO3 during the run. This decreases HCO3 concentration and partially mitigates scavenging, most notably in the 10 mM case, where HCO3 drops from 1.8 to 0.66 mM. In short, carbonate alkalinity diverts OH to CO3•−, and at higher DIC, it damps cavitation.
Figure 10c illustrates how Na2CO3 affects SSY removal via US/PAA system. Note that the 1 mM Na2CO3 test begins at pH 4.4 and ends at pH 4.2. Under these acidic conditions, the carbonate system consists primarily of CO2(aq)/H2CO3, with only trace amounts of HCO3 and negligible amounts of CO32− (pKa1 = 6.35; pKa2 = 10.33). Therefore, direct OH scavenging by bicarbonate is limited. However, the rate is reduced by two factors: operating far from the identified pH optimum, and the gas effect of dissolved CO2, which reduces cavitation intensity and lowers radical yields. The observed slowdown relative to pH-matched controls (Figure 10b) is consistent with established sonochemical behavior.
When using 10 mM Na2CO3, the run begins at pH 7.2 and ends at pH 7.8. In this case, the solution is buffered near a neutral to mildly alkaline pH. This shifts the system toward the zone of the highest intrinsic US/PAA activity on the pH scale (Figure 10b). The slight increase in pH to 7.8 over 270 min is consistent with CO2 stripping during ultrasonication. This shifts the carbonate equilibrium and raises the pH. Despite the fact that carbonate is a classical OH scavenger (OH + HCO3, k = 8.5 × 106 M−1·s−1 [13]; OH + CO32−, k = 3.9 × 108 M−1·s−1 [13]), the net kinetics improve for two reasons. First, proximity to the optimum pH (i.e., 9) strengthens the generation of radicals from PAA and cavitation. Second, the carbonate-centered radical (CO3•−), formed by OH capture, remains an oxidant that can react efficiently, albeit more selectively, with azo/aromatic sites in SSY (E° = 1.6–1.8 V vs. NHE). The data trend, rapid decay at 10 mM Na2CO3 approaching the pH 9 control, accords with this balance between pH promotion and selective radical channeling.
In the US/PAA system, cavitation provides OH and PAA produces organic radicals, which are maximized at pH 9. Carbonate alters both the radical budget and the pH. At low dose in acidic media (1 mM Na2CO3 or NaHCO3), CO2-rich bubbles suppresses cavitation, so the system remains far from its pH optimum. This results in slower removal. With a higher dose (10 mM Na2CO3), the solution buffers into the favorable pH range and gradually becomes more alkaline via CO2 degassing. This more than compensates for the diversion of OH to CO3•−, which provides a parallel, more selective oxidant pathway. These carbonate trends align overall with PAA speciation and stability, carbonate equilibria, gas-dependent cavitation, and the well-characterized kinetics and redox properties of OH, HCO3, CO32−, and CO3•−.
In summary, the US/PAA process for SSY removal is highly resilient to common background electrolytes at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 mM. Na2SO4, NaCl, and KNO3 only cause minor kinetic changes, consistent with a mixed-radical regime. In this regime, interfacial OH radicals and PAA-derived acyl/acetyl peroxyl radicals sustain the oxidant flux, even when OH are partially diverted (e.g., to RCS or SO4•−). Conversely, nitrite exerts strong, concentration-dependent inhibition, reflecting its near-diffusion-controlled scavenging of OH to the less reactive NO2, sharply depressing the steady-state radical level. Carbonate alkalinity shows dual, pH-coupled effects. First, it redirects OH to CO3•−, yielding a more selective oxidant that slows apparent SSY decay. Second, at acidic pH (as when PAA addition lowers pH into 3.7–5.7), added DIC shifts to dissolved CO2, and CO2-rich bubble atmospheres dampen cavitation, suppressing OH yields; this explains performance losses at low DIC and low pH. However, when carbonate buffers toward mildly alkaline pH (8–9), the intrinsic US/PAA optimum governed by PAA speciation, the pH promotion outweighs OH diversion, so net performance improves despite CO3•− formation.
Overall, these outcomes suggest that the US/PAA process maintains high reactivity in the presence of modest chloride, nitrate, or sulfate concentrations. However, the process is sensitive to nitrite and inorganic carbon speciation. These findings provide clear guidance for treatment in real waters.

2.5. Water Matrices Impact

In benchmark tests of the US/PAA process in environmental water matrices, SSY dissolved in several real waters, including Zamzam water, tap water, seawater, and tertiary effluent from a municipal wastewater treatment plant (TEMWWTP) prior to chlorination, and compared with run carried out using ultrapure water. The results are shown in Figure 11. The physicochemical parameters of the water samples are summarized in Table 1.
Zamzam water was included in the study because of its unique composition, which is characterized by high alkalinity, elevated total dissolved solids, and a distinctive ionic profile. These features provided a natural matrix with strong buffering capacity and high mineral content, which allowed the process sensitivity to carbonate alkalinity and ionic strength to be probed under conditions different from those of conventional tap water. The inclusion of Zamzam water was intended as a mechanistic probe rather than as a direct application case, complementing the more representative matrices of seawater, tap water, and tertiary municipal effluent.
Note that the addition of 5 mM PAA to the various water matrices decreased the pH to the range of 3.7–4.4. SSY decay exhibits a distinct matrix hierarchy: seawater > ultrapure water > tap water ≈ Zamzam water > TEMWWTP (Figure 11). Since the pH was nearly similar across the matrices, the differences can be attributed to three factors: production and partitioning of radicals by abundant inorganic ions (especially halides and carbonate species), cavitation physics in high-ionic-strength media, and scavenging of radicals and oxidants by organic matter in the tertiary effluent.
The high concentrations of Cl and Br in seawater (24.09 g/L and 83 mg/L, respectively) enable the rapid capture of OH formed at cavitation interfaces. This generates reactive chlorine/bromine species (RCS/RBS) via sequences such as OH + Cl (+ H+) → Cl → Cl2•− and OH + Br → BrOH•− → Br/Br2•−. These halogen radicals are potent, selective oxidants that react quickly with aromatic and azo moieties. This provides parallel oxidative pathways to OH and explains why seawater outperforms ultrapure water. Ultrasonication is also known to favor RCS formation in chloride media. High salinity can alter cavitation, producing smaller, more stable bubbles and reducing coalescence. This often enhances net sonochemical yields.
In ultrapure water, there are no strong inorganic or organic scavengers; therefore, dye oxidation primarily proceeds through cavitation-generated OH together with PAA-derived organic radicals. Owing to the acid–base behavior of PAA (pKa = 8.2), differences in speciation among matrices are negligible once PAA sets the pH. The modestly slower kinetics observed in ultrapure water, corresponding to 61.2% and 88.2% removal at 30 and 90 min, respectively, compared with 72.1% and 96.5% in seawater, are therefore more consistent with the absence of halogen-radical channels than with a pH-related effect.
Both tap water and Zamzam water contain moderate amounts of halides and are highly alkaline. Their HCO3 concentrations are 98 and 172 mg/L, respectively. They are also both hard, with high concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+. Under acidic conditions imposed by PAA, most inorganic carbon is present as dissolved CO2/H2CO3. This limits direct OH → CO3•− conversion. However, CO2 in solution and in cavitation bubbles can reduce hotspot temperatures and suppress OH yields. Due to its higher alkalinity, Zamzam introduces more CO2 into the cavitation field at the experimental pH level. This directly suppresses the generation of OH. Its higher TDS contributes to increased ultrasound attenuation and unfavorable bubble dynamics. These inhibitory effects readily explain the modest yet consistent difference between Zamzam and tap waters under otherwise identical US/PAA conditions, corresponding to 39.0% and 70.9% removal at 30 and 90 min, respectively, in Zamzam water, and 43.8% and 74.2% in tap water.
Despite having a comparable inorganic profile (bicarbonate, chloride, and hardness) to other freshwaters, the effluent from the MWWTP shows the weakest SSY removal. At 30 and 90 min, the removal efficiencies were 29.5% and 59.0%, respectively, in the MWWTP effluent, compared with 39.0–43.8% and 70.9–74.2% in Zamzam and tap waters. Even at low COD/BOD ratios, the dissolved organic matter in the effluent efficiently scavenges both OH and halogen radicals. This lowers their steady-state levels and competes with the target compound. The dissolved organic matter in the effluent often dominates as the OH sink, strongly attenuating removal kinetics.
In practice, US/PAA is highly effective in saline and coastal environments, where halogen-radical pathways are prevalent. Despite some inhibition, results indicate that US/PAA remains viable in various water matrices.
Although this work focused on mechanistic and kinetic aspects, the economic feasibility of US/PAA is an essential consideration for future application. The main cost drivers are ultrasonication energy input, PAA dosage, and water matrix composition. For example, higher ultrasonication power improves removal efficiency but increases energy demand, while elevated alkalinity or organic matter content reduces efficiency and thus raises the effective treatment cost. A full techno-economic analysis, including energy consumption per unit volume treated and oxidant cost per unit pollutant removed, is needed to benchmark US/PAA against established AOPs.

2.6. Mechanistic Pathways of SSY Oxidation via US/PAA

Figure 12 shows the proposed radical pathways for SSY degradation via US/PAA. Cavitation collapse generates a hot gas core approaching 5000 K and a surrounding liquid shell near 2000 K. Under these conditions, water undergoes homolysis to yield hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals, while subsequent recombination produces hydrogen peroxide together with hydroperoxyl or superoxide species in the liquid phase. In the acidic environment imposed by PAA, hydroperoxyl radicals are favored over superoxide. PAA is activated both thermally at the bubble–liquid interface and by hydroxyl radicals, producing oxygen-centered species. The dominant organic radicals are the acyloxyl radical (CH3COO) and the acetylperoxyl radical (CH3C(O)OO, also written CH3CO3). The acyloxyl radical rapidly decarboxylates to release carbon dioxide, forming a methyl radical that subsequently reacts with oxygen to yield the methylperoxyl radical. In ion-free water, the principal direct oxidant toward SSY is the hydroxyl radical, while the organic radicals act as complementary oxidants with lower intrinsic reactivity but higher selectivity. The initial attack on the dye proceeds either through hydroxyl radical addition to the azo linkage or via one-electron transfer leading to the formation of an azo radical cation. Cleavage of the –N=N– bond yields 4-aminobenzenesulfonate and 1-amino-2-naphthol-6-sulfonate, which are established degradation fragments of SSY and related sulfonated azo dyes [18,19]. Subsequent oxidation of these intermediates produces quinone-type species on the naphthalene ring, followed by further degradation into low-molecular-weight carboxylic acids such as oxalic, acetic, and formic acids [18,19].

3. Materials and Methods

PAA (32% w/w in dilute acetic acid; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as received. Other chemicals were also analytical grade unless specified. SSY (Sunset Yellow FCF; 90% purity; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as the substrate. Solutions were made with Milli-Q ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm).
Stock solutions of PAA (100 mM) and SSY (100 mg/L) were prepared and stored at 4 °C in the dark.
A cylindrical glass reactor with an internal diameter of 6 cm and a piezoelectric transducer measuring 4 cm at its base was operated at 425 kHz with variable electrical power (40–100 W). The bulk temperature was controlled via jacket recirculation and monitored with an in situ thermocouple. Acoustic power was quantified calorimetrically by monitoring the temperature rise in the sonicated liquid over time and applying the energy balance equation.
SSY was quantified by UV–visible spectrophotometry (UV7, Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA) at λmax = 482 nm. After each reading, the aliquot was returned to the sonoreactor within 30 s to maintain a constant ultrasonic power density.
Control experiments using 5 mM PAA at pH 3.3 revealed minimal SSY removal. These results suggest that intact PAA is not an effective two-electron oxidant for this dye and that activation is necessary.
To exclude base-promoted loss of dye at higher pH, particularly at pH 9, two controls were conducted in the absence of PAA. A silent control at pH 9 without ultrasonication showed no measurable decolorization over 270 min. Ultrasound-only experiments exhibited slower degradation kinetics at pH 9 compared with other conditions across the studied pH range of 1–11. These controls confirm that the enhanced removal observed at pH 9 under US/PAA is not attributable to alkaline instability of the dye.
The initial SSY concentration of 5 mg/L reflects values used in mechanistic studies and matches the lower band of concentrations reported for colored effluents after dilution or mixing [20]. SSY removal studies frequently apply 5 mg/L to enable reliable kinetics and product identification [21]. Reviews of real dye wastewaters report typical dye levels from about 10 to 50 mg/L with higher values at specific stages, which frames 5 mg/L as an environmentally relevant and conservative case [20]. The PAA dose of 5 mM lies within the mM range commonly used in PAA-based AOP and is comparable to doses that have produced measurable oxidant formation and contaminant removal [5]. The ultrasonication frequency was fixed at 425 kHz in the medium frequency region where strong sonochemical activity and high oxidant yields, and recent work reports optimal degradation near 400–500 kHz with an electrical power input close to 100 W [22,23,24]. The electrical power of 100 W therefore targets a regime that sustains stable cavitation and efficient oxidant generation in bench reactors.
All experiments were run in triplicate; unless stated otherwise, values are reported as the mean of three independent runs. Statistical differences were evaluated using two-tailed Student’s t-tests, with p < 0.03 taken as significant.

4. Conclusions

US/PAA at 425 kHz rapidly eliminates SSY through a mixed-radical mechanism. In this process, OH radicals generated by cavitation act in concert with PAA-derived acyl and peroxyl species at the interface. After 90 min, the US/PAA process achieved 54.9%, 76.5%, 79.7%, and 88.2% removal at 40, 60, 80, and 100 W, respectively, compared with 33.6%, 44.0%, 54.7%, and 66.0% for ultrasound alone at the same powers, and 4.5% for PAA alone. The corresponding synergy indices were 2.90, 3.28, 2.22, and 2.03. Pathway apportionment with selective scavengers confirms the mixed-radical chemistry. AA and alcohols traps strongly and dose-dependently reduce SSY decay. This is consistent with the capture of OH being nearly diffusion-controlled and the rapid reduction in peroxyl-type radicals. Meanwhile, nitrite emerges as a decisive inhibitor by converting OH to the less reactive NO2. At 10 mM, 75.8% of the initial dye concentration remained after 270 min, in contrast to complete decay at 210 min in the additive-free run. Scavenger diagnostics collectively demonstrate a mixed-radical regime. Although OH is necessary, organic acyl/peroxyl radicals from PAA activation are essential for high US/PAA reactivity due to their sensitivity to TEMPO. The process was highly robust to common electrolytes over 1–10 mM. Minor kinetic changes were produced by NaCl, KNO3, and Na2SO4, consistent with compensating pathways in which converted OH yields reactive secondary oxidants (e.g., RCS or SO4•−), while PAA-derived radicals sustain flux. Nitrate shows little impact within the tested range. The pH data indicate that the practical optimum pH for US/PAA is around 9. Losses occur at pH levels of 11 and 5 due to base-promoted PAA decay and an insufficient peracetate fraction, respectively. These results align with the acid-base properties of PAA (pKa = 8.2) and sonochemical radical generation. Carbonate alkalinity exerted a dual influence. At low concentration (1 mM) and acidic pH, it slowed removal by converting OH to the more selective CO3•− and by damping cavitation with CO2. However, at higher carbonate levels (10 mM), mild buffering toward the intrinsic pH optimum (approximately 8–9) outweighed OH conversion and accelerated degradation. Together, these results explain the pronounced pH-rate relationship observed for US/PAA and provide clear guidance on inorganic-matrix sensitivities. Tests in real water matrices revealed the following reactivity order: seawater > ultrapure water > tap water ≈ Zamzam water > tertiary effluent. Seawater benefits from abundant halides that rapidly convert OH to reactive chlorine and bromine species, providing parallel oxidation channels under ultrasonication. In contrast, tertiary treated municipal wastewater effluent underperforms because its organic matter competitively scavenges radicals. The subtle Zamzam water < tap water difference is best explained by Zamzam’s higher alkalinity and TDS. These increase dissolved CO2 at the experimental pH, adding acoustic attenuation. Both of these factors are unfavorable for cavitation-OH production.
From an application standpoint, US/PAA is a promising hybrid AOP for saline and many fresh waters. Overall, this study establishes US/PAA as a chemically versatile and matrix-resilient technology. It pinpoints specific interferents, such as nitrite and high DIC/dissolved effluent organic matter, and delineates operating windows for efficiently abating dyes in real waters.
This study focused on the degradation and decolorization of SSY via US/PAA treatment. Although significant removal was achieved, the extent of mineralization was not assessed, and no claim of complete mineralization is made. Future work should include identification of degradation intermediates and TOC/COD measurements to confirm the absence of potentially toxic byproducts and to quantitatively evaluate mineralization.

Author Contributions

Investigation, validation, data curation, visualization, A.B.; Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, O.H.; Conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, resources, visualization, supervision, L.E.B.; Resources, validation, visualization, funding acquisition, M.K.H.-K.; Validation, visualization, supervision, A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ongoing Research Funding Program, (ORFFT-2025-086-3), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Barciela, P.; Perez-Vazquez, A.; Prieto, M.A. Azo Dyes in the Food Industry: Features, Classification, Toxicity, Alternatives, and Regulation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2023, 178, 113935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jacox, M.E. Electronic Energy Levels of Small Polyatomic Transient Molecules. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 269–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  3. Hamdaoui, O.; Kerboua, K. Energy Aspects of Acoustic Cavitation and Sonochemistry: Fundamentals and Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; ISBN 9780323919371. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kiejza, D.; Kotowska, U.; Polińska, W.; Karpińska, J. Peracids—New Oxidants in Advanced Oxidation Processes: The Use of Peracetic Acid, Peroxymonosulfate, and Persulfate Salts in the Removal of Organic Micropollutants of Emerging Concern—A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 790, 148195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ao, X.W.; Eloranta, J.; Huang, C.H.; Santoro, D.; Sun, W.J.; Lu, Z.D.; Li, C. Peracetic Acid-Based Advanced Oxidation Processes for Decontamination and Disinfection of Water: A Review. Water Res. 2021, 188, 116479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tong, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Sun, C. Reactive Species in Peracetic Acid-Based AOPs: A Critical Review of Their Formation Mechanisms, Identification Methods and Oxidation Performances. Water Res. 2025, 272, 122917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lei, Y.; Cheng, S.; Luo, N.; Yang, X.; An, T. Rate Constants and Mechanisms of the Reactions of Cl and Cl2•− with Trace Organic Contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 11170–11182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hamdaoui, O.; Merouani, S.; Benmahmoud, H.C.; Ait Idir, M.; Ferkous, H.; Alghyamah, A. Ultrasound/Chlorine: A Novel Synergistic Sono-Hybrid Process for Allura Red AC Degradation. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Merouani, S.; Hamdaoui, O.; Saoudi, F.; Chiha, M.; Pétrier, C. Influence of Bicarbonate and Carbonate Ions on Sonochemical Degradation of Rhodamine B in Aqueous Phase. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Crean, C.; Uvaydov, Y.; Geacintov, N.E.; Shafirovich, V. Oxidation of Single-Stranded Oligonucleotides by Carbonate Radical Anions: Generating Intrastrand Cross-Links between Guanine and Thymine Bases Separated by Cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 742–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Newhart, K.B.; Goldman-Torres, J.E.; Freedman, D.E.; Wisdom, K.B.; Hering, A.S.; Cath, T.Y. Prediction of Peracetic Acid Disinfection Performance for Secondary Municipal Wastewater Treatment Using Artificial Neural Networks. ACS ES&T Water 2020, 1, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pflieger, R.; Nikitenko, S.I.; Ashokkumar, M. Effect of NaCl Salt on Sonochemistry and Sonoluminescence in Aqueous Solutions. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 59, 104753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Buxton, G.V.; Greenstock, C.L.; Helman, W.P.; Ross, A.B. Critical Review of Rate Constants for Reactions of Hydrated Electrons, Hydrogen Atoms and Hydroxyl Radicals (OH/O•−) in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Neta, P.; Huie, R.E.; Ross, A.B. Rate Constants for Reactions of Peroxyl Radicals in Fluid Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1990, 19, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tauber, A.; Mark, G.; Schuchmann, H.-P.; von Sonntag, C. Sonolysis of Tert-Butyl Alcohol in Aqueous Solution. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 2, 1129–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, M.Y.; Cline, C.S.; Koker, E.B.; Carmichael, H.H.; Chignell, C.F.; Bilski, P. Quenching of Singlet Molecular Oxygen (1O2) by Azide Anion in Solvent Mixtures. Photochem. Photobiol. 2001, 74, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sadowska-Bartosz, I.; Bartosz, G. The Cellular and Organismal Effects of Nitroxides and Nitroxide-Containing Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gosetti, F.; Gianotti, V.; Polati, S.; Gennaro, M.C. HPLC-MS Degradation Study of E110 Sunset Yellow FCF in a Commercial Beverage. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1090, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moreira, F.C.; Garcia-Segura, S.; Vilar, V.J.P.; Boaventura, R.A.R.; Brillas, E. Decolorization and Mineralization of Sunset Yellow FCF Azo Dye by Anodic Oxidation, Electro-Fenton, UVA Photoelectro-Fenton and Solar Photoelectro-Fenton Processes. Appl. Catal. B 2013, 142–143, 877–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yaseen, D.A.; Scholz, M. Textile Dye Wastewater Characteristics and Constituents of Synthetic Effluents: A Critical Review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 1193–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumari, R.; Sircar, A.; Dey, S.; Qaiyum, M.A.; Bist, N.; Yadav, K. Sequestration of a Food Dye (Sunset Yellow) from Wastewater Using Natural Adsorbent: A Kinetic, Isotherm and Interference Study. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2024, 26, 1716–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Pan, X.; Liu, L.X.; Bussemaker, M.J. Correlation of Sonochemical Activities Measured via Dosimetry and an Area-Selective Analysis of Sono(Chemi)Luminescence. RSC Mechanochemistry 2025, 2, 399–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, S.Y.; Kim, I.Y.; Park, S.H.; Hwangbo, M.; Hwangbo, S. Novel Ultrasonic Technology for Advanced Oxidation Processes of Water Treatment. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 11939–11948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Manickam, S.; Camilla Boffito, D.; Flores, E.M.M.; Leveque, J.M.; Pflieger, R.; Pollet, B.G.; Ashokkumar, M. Ultrasonics and Sonochemistry: Editors’ Perspective. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2023, 99, 106540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of azo dye Sunset Yellow FCF disodium salt.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of azo dye Sunset Yellow FCF disodium salt.
Catalysts 15 01044 g001
Figure 2. (a) SSY degradation kinetics via PAA alone, US alone and US/PAA at various powers and (b) corresponding pseudo-first order rate constants (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 40–100 W).
Figure 2. (a) SSY degradation kinetics via PAA alone, US alone and US/PAA at various powers and (b) corresponding pseudo-first order rate constants (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 40–100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g002
Figure 3. Impact of (a) AA and (b) t-BuOH on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Figure 3. Impact of (a) AA and (b) t-BuOH on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g003
Figure 4. Impact of (a) 2-PrOH and (b) NB on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Figure 4. Impact of (a) 2-PrOH and (b) NB on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g004
Figure 5. Impact of (a) BA and (b) NaN3 on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Figure 5. Impact of (a) BA and (b) NaN3 on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g005
Figure 6. Impact of (a) Ph and (b) TEMPO on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Figure 6. Impact of (a) Ph and (b) TEMPO on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g006
Figure 7. Impact of HA on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Figure 7. Impact of HA on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g007
Figure 8. Impact of (a) sulfate, (b) chloride and (c) nitrate on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Figure 8. Impact of (a) sulfate, (b) chloride and (c) nitrate on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g008
Figure 9. Impact of nitrite on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Figure 9. Impact of nitrite on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, pH 3.3, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g009
Figure 10. Impact of (a) bicarbonate, (b) pH and (c) carbonate on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Figure 10. Impact of (a) bicarbonate, (b) pH and (c) carbonate on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g010
Figure 11. Impact of various water environment matrices on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Figure 11. Impact of various water environment matrices on SSY degradation kinetics via US/PAA process (5 mg/L SSY, 5 mM PAA, 200 mL, 425 kHz, 100 W).
Catalysts 15 01044 g011
Figure 12. Proposed radical pathways for SSY degradation via US/PAA.
Figure 12. Proposed radical pathways for SSY degradation via US/PAA.
Catalysts 15 01044 g012
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters of the tested water matrices.
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters of the tested water matrices.
ParameterZamzam WaterTap WaterSeawaterTertiary Effluent
Calcium (mg/L)925050896
Magnesium (mg/L)1815161828
Sodium (mg/L)129.59013,440-
Potassium (mg/L)44.55483-
Bicarbonate (mg/L)17298130185
Chloride (mg/L)164.512024,090196
Sulfate (mg/L)123.6703384-
Nitrate (mg/L)132.35--
Fluoride (mg/L)0.590.61-
Bromide (mg/L)--83-
pH7.57.68.18.2
TDS (mg/L)81035043,8001231
COD * (mg/L)---7
BOD5 ** (mg/L)---2.7
* Chemical Oxygen Demand, ** 5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baker, A.; Hamdaoui, O.; El Blidi, L.; Hadj-Kali, M.K.; Alghyamah, A. Ultrasound/Peracetic Acid Degradation of Sunset Yellow FCF: Scavenger-Mapped Radical Pathways and the Impact of Salts and Environmental Water Matrices. Catalysts 2025, 15, 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111044

AMA Style

Baker A, Hamdaoui O, El Blidi L, Hadj-Kali MK, Alghyamah A. Ultrasound/Peracetic Acid Degradation of Sunset Yellow FCF: Scavenger-Mapped Radical Pathways and the Impact of Salts and Environmental Water Matrices. Catalysts. 2025; 15(11):1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baker, Abdulmajeed, Oualid Hamdaoui, Lahssen El Blidi, Mohamed K. Hadj-Kali, and Abdulaziz Alghyamah. 2025. "Ultrasound/Peracetic Acid Degradation of Sunset Yellow FCF: Scavenger-Mapped Radical Pathways and the Impact of Salts and Environmental Water Matrices" Catalysts 15, no. 11: 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111044

APA Style

Baker, A., Hamdaoui, O., El Blidi, L., Hadj-Kali, M. K., & Alghyamah, A. (2025). Ultrasound/Peracetic Acid Degradation of Sunset Yellow FCF: Scavenger-Mapped Radical Pathways and the Impact of Salts and Environmental Water Matrices. Catalysts, 15(11), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111044

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop