Next Article in Journal
Bayesian Optimization for an ATP-Regenerating In Vitro Enzyme Cascade
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficient Conversion of Monosaccharides into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Using Acidic Deep Eutectic Solvents
Previous Article in Journal
Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Nitrophenols via Ag Nanoparticles Supported on Citric-Acid-Modified Polyaniline
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rapid and Simple Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Benzoxazoles Catalyzed by [CholineCl][Oxalic Acid]
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Efficient Strategy for Chemoenzymatic Conversion of Corn Stover to Furfuryl Alcohol in Deep Eutectic Solvent ChCl:PEG10000−Water Medium

1
National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biomass Refining and High-Quality Utilization, School of Pharmacy, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, School of Biochemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Catalysts 2023, 13(3), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13030467
Submission received: 1 January 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 15 February 2023 / Published: 22 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalysts in Neoteric Solvents II)

Abstract

:
As a versatile and valuable intermediate, furfuryl alcohol (FOL) is widely utilized in manufacturing vitamin C, perfume, fruit acid, lubricant, lysine, plasticizer, dispersing agent, resin, fuel additive, and biofuel. This study aimed at the establishment of a cascade catalysis of biomass to FOL via a hybrid approach in a deep eutectic solvent medium. The catalysis of corn stover (75 g/L) with solid acid AT-Sn-WLS (1.2 wt%) produced 110.5 mM FAL in a ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) system at 170 °C for 30 min, and then the formed FAL was biologically transformed into FOL with recombinant E. coli SF harboring aldehyde reductase at pH 7.0 and 35 °C. This established hybrid strategy could efficiently valorize corn stover into FOL, with the productivity of 0.41 g FOL per g xylan in corn stover. Consequently, one combination of chemocatalytic and biocatalytic reactions leading to a one-pot catalytic process was shown as an attractive approach in the valorization of lignocellulose into valuable biobased chemicals.

1. Introduction

The swift depletion of traditional fossil energy and the excessive emission of greenhouse gases have attracted much attention to alleviate the heavy reliance on non-renewable sources [1]. Great efforts have been made worldwide to develop various sustainable and eco-friendly processes for manufacturing valuable biobased compounds and biofuel molecules from available, abundant, inexpensive, and renewable biomacromolecules [2,3]. Generally speaking, lignocellulosic biomass is composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin [4], and other components (e.g., proteins, ash, extractives, and pectin). As one of the value-added bio-based platform molecules, furfuryl alcohol (FOL), which can be obtained via the selective hydrogenation of furfural (FAL) [5,6], is widely utilized as an important platform molecule for the synthesis of furan-based chemicals [7,8], and it can also be used in the production of resins, vitamin C, perfume, lysine, polymer, plasticizer, lubricant, dispersing agent, and biofuels [9,10,11,12]. Approximately 62% of furfural (FAL) is utilized for the production of FOL [13]. Industrially, the liquid- or gas-phase hydrogenation of FAL is utilized to manufacture FOL [14,15]. To avoid the high temperature/pressure and noble metal catalysts, significant efforts have been made to develop efficient and sustainable processing technology under mild performance conditions [16,17]. Biocatalytic synthesis is now an attractive and eco-friendly alternative to the traditional chemical processes [18,19]. In addition, the use of whole cells or enzymes as catalysts can thus provide suitable and efficient methodologies for developing sustainable catalytic processes [20]. To efficiently synthesize FOL under mild conditions, biological reduction can be used to transform FAL using some bacteria-harboring reductases [21,22,23].
To efficiently transform biomacromolecules into FOL, a chemoenzymatic cascade process has been developed by combining the chemical catalysis of biomass into FAL and the biological reduction of FAL into FOL [22,23]. It is of importance to establish an efficient process for transforming lignocellulose to FAL in a high yield and obtain a high load of FAL. Generally, FAL can be manufactured from biomacromolecules and D-xylose by acidic catalysts [4]. FAL can be used to prepare a series of furan-based compounds [24,25]. It is widely used in the production of plastics, fuels, perfumes, resins, polymers, oil refining, pharmaceuticals, and agrochemicals [26,27,28]. In industry, FAL is mainly prepared from lignocellulose biomass using homogeneous mineral acid catalysts and heterogeneous solid acid catalysts [29,30,31]. Furfural (FAL) is a widely used versatile building block that can be derived from lignocellulosic biomass via acid hydrolysis/dehydration [32]. It is a versatile starting material for numerous intermediate chemicals, monomers, and biofuel molecules [14]. Homogeneous catalysts (HCl, HCOOH, H2SO4, etc.) [32,33,34] and heterogeneous catalysts (Amberlyst, modified coal fly ash, sulfonated zeolite, microporous acids, zeolite, Nafion, lignin, etc.) have been prepared and utilized to manufacture FAL. Distinct from the homogeneous catalysts, heterogeneous catalysts have the advantages of good thermostability, low corrosivity, excellent catalytic activity, and repeated use and can be easily separated [35,36,37]. The extraction of FAL from the catalytic system employing effective chemocatalysts or extraction solvents has been used for enhancing the productivity of FAL. Recently, deep eutectic solvent (DES) has become known as an eco-friendly solvent. It can be obtained by blending a hydrogen-bond acceptor (HBA) and a hydrogen-bond donor (HBD) that is capable of self-association via hydrogen-bonding interactions to generate a eutectic [38,39]. DESs possess the advantages of low toxicity, low cost, ease of syntheses, biodegradability, and negligible volatility. In addition, DESs can be utilized to fractionate and pretreat lignocellulose, as well as to catalyze the conversion of carbohydrates [40]. Choline chloride (ChCl) is one of the most widespread quaternary ammonium salts used for the formation of DES because ChCl is cheap and can be easily extracted from biomass. ChCl-based DESs have attracted considerable attention for FAL production [41].
The seafood-processing industries generate approximately 6–8 million tons of crustacean waste (e.g., crab waste, shrimp shell, and lobster shell) globally every year [42,43]. In processing lobster, ~70% of the body weight is discarded as waste. As one kind of biomass resource, waste lobster shell (WLS) containing chitin was attempted as biobased carrier to prepare heterogeneous catalyst (AT-Sn-WLS). Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a water-soluble neutral polyether and a PEG-based DES (ChCl:PEG10000). To efficiently transform biomass into value-added furans, it is necessary to establish an appropriate catalytic process [30,37,44,45]. Herein, the objective of this work is to develop a chemoenzymatic process for the hybrid conversion of corn stover (CS) to FOL in a tandem reaction with AT-Sn-WLS catalysis and biocatalysis in a PEG-based DES medium. The corresponding chemocatalytic and biocatalytic operational parameters are optimized. One efficient and sustainable transformation of biomacromolecules into high-value chemicals is developed in an eco-friendly medium.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Raw Corn Stover and UST-Sn-LS-Treated Corn Stover

Using WLS as biobased support, the sulfonated tin-based heterogeneous chemocatalyst AT-Sn-WLS was prepared. The surface morphologies of WLS and AT-Sn-WLS were examined by using SEM and the results are illustrated in Figure 1. It was obviously shown that AT-Sn-WLS had a loose structure with micropores and cracks, verifying that and the preparation process of AT-Sn-WLS could change the structure of the WLS surface (Figure 1).
FTIR is widely employed to obtain information on the existence of chemical bonds and functional groups [17]. The structure of the AT-Sn-WLS catalysts was further characterized by FTIR (Figure 2). It indicated that AT-Sn-WLS had a different surface compared with the untreated LS. The bond near 678 cm−1 is associated with SnO2 [36]. The 876 cm−1 is assigned to β-glycosidic linkage or CO32−. The wide band 1141 cm−1 is associated with the stretch vibration of C-O and S=O [46]. 1446 cm− 1 is related to the N-H stretching of chitin and C-O bending. The peak near 1648 is ascribed to amide I bonds (two types of hydrogen bonds in a CO group with the NH group of the adjacent chain and the OH group of the interchain). The peaks at around 3268 and 2934 cm−1 are assigned to N-H and -CH in chitin, and were observed to be substantially weakened because of the removal of chitin after the preparation of AT-Sn-WLS. The bond near 3443 cm−1 was associated with the stretching vibration of -OH [17,22].
XRD analysis can be performed to understand the crystalline state of the chemical catalyst during carbonization and sulfonation [47]. As presented in Figure 3, AT-Sn-WLS has an amorphous structure, which is different from WLS. The crystalline peak of LS at 29.4° is ascribed to chitin. In addition, the narrow diffraction peaks detected at 25.4°, 31.4°, 38.4°, 40.8°, 43.3°, 48.7°, 51.7°, 55.7°, and 65.9° are associated with the crystal structure of SnO2 loaded on tin-based solid acid [48].
Thermogravimetric analysis (TG) was used to examine the structural changes of the samples with temperature, which to some extent reflected the thermal stability of the catalysts [49]. The TG curve of AT-Sn-WLS is illustrated in Figure 3. When the heating temperature reaches 750 °C, only 1.47% mass loss is observed on the AT-Sn-WLS prepared in this study, reflecting the good thermal stability of AT-Sn-WLS (Figure 4). The TG curve of AT-Sn-WLS is composed of three main stages for weight loss in the range of 50–750 °C. In the first stage of 50–100 °C, it is likely that CO2 emission and/or water evaporation causes the loss of weight. In the second stage of 200–400 °C, the degradation of the carboxyl group (-COOH) and hydroxyl group (HO-) may cause a slight mass loss [50]. In the third stage of 600–750 °C, the potential aromatization of the structural network may result in weight loss [51].

2.2. Synthesis of FAL from with UST-Sn-LS in ChCl:PEG10000–Water

FAL is a very promising platform molecule that can be utilized in turn to manufacture a variety of valuable furan compounds. To efficiently convert corn stover into FAL, various catalytic parameters (e.g., DES ChCl:PEG10000 dosage, UST-Sn-LS dose, catalytic temperature, catalytic duration) were tested on the FAL yield. Corn stover (75 g/L) was used as feedstock for the preparation of FAL with UST-Sn-LS (0–6 wt%) in DES ChCl:PEG10000–water (0:100–50:50, wt/wt) at 160–190 °C for 5–50 min.
Solvent plays a key role in the heterogeneous catalytic reaction and the FAL yield is highly dependent on the reaction solvent [17]. By raising the DES ChCl:PEG10000 dose from 0 to 20 wt% at 170 °C for 30 min, the FAL yield rose from 41.7% to 53.5% (Figure 5). As the mass ratios of ChCl:PEG10000-to-water rose from 20:80 to 50:50, the FAL yields weakened slightly. In the presence of ChCl:PEG10000 (50 wt%), the FAL yield reached 48.9%. It was likely that an excessive DES load might confine the contact opportunity of substrate biomass to chemocatalyst to some extent, which would cause a slight decrease in the formation of FAL [44]. Obviously, the optimal DES ChCl:PEG10000 dose in the ChCl:PEG10000–water system was 20 wt%, and ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) was employed as an appropriate reaction medium for the valorization of corn stover into FAL.
The catalyst loading can significantly affect the conversion of biomass into FAL [25,44]. In this constructed ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) medium, the FAL yields were comparatively higher when the UST-Sn-LS load was raised from 0 to 1.2 wt%. The highest FAL yield reached 53.5% in the presence of UST-Sn-LS (1.2 wt%) at 170 °C for 30 min (Figure 6). As the UST-Sn-LS load increased from 1.2 wt% to 6.0 wt%, the formed FAL had no obvious change. An excessive catalyst load might provide more acidity and cause undesired side reactions [17], and the FAL yield maintained a stable level. Hence, the optimal load of UST-Sn-LS was 1.2 wt%.
The catalytic temperature (160, 170, 180, and 190 °C) and catalytic duration (5–50 min) had a profound influence on the generation of FAL (Figure 7). The maximum FAL yield reached 53.5% using corn stover (75.0 g/L) as feedstock in the presence of UST-Sn-LS (1.2 wt%) as chemocatalyst in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) at 170 °C for 30 min. The high reaction temperature was not only conducive to the dehydration of biomass-derived D-xylose to FAL, but also promoted the side reaction, which led to the degradation of FAL products through cracking, condensation, and resinization [26]. With the increase in the reaction time, the side reaction was enhanced and the FAL yield gradually dropped [31].
In the valorization of biomass or biomass-derived D-xylose to FAL, it is found that chloride salts can be beneficial for stabilizing the structure of the transition state of the reaction, alleviating the occurrence of undesired side reactions and enhancing the productivity of FAL [44]. Different chloride salts (SnCl4, CrCl3, AlCl3, FeCl3, CuCl2, KCl, CoCl2, NH4Cl, LiCl, NaCl, MgCl2, CaCl2, and ZnCl2) (15.0 g/L) were separately added into the ChCl:PEG10000–water system. Compared to the control without metal chlorides, SnCl4, CrCl3, AlCl3, FeCl3, CuCl2, KCl, CoCl2, NH4Cl, LiCl, NaCl, and MgCl2 inhibited the FAL productivity in ChCl:PEG10000–water (Figure 8a). CaCl2 and ZnCl2 slightly promoted the formation of FAL. In particular, ZnCl2 (15.0 g/L) favored the generation of FAL with the highest yield (57.2%) in ChCl:PEG10000–water. Furthermore, various doses of ZnCl2 (0–30 g/L) were individually supplemented to the ChCl:PEG10000–water medium for testing (Figure 8b). No significant inhibition was observed. A slightly higher FAL yield was obtained at 57.2% in ChCl:PEG10000–water containing 15 g/L of ZnCl2, while the FAL yield (as the control) without the addition of ZnCl2 reached 53.5%. ZnCl2 possessing intrinsic Brönsted/Lewis acidities might synergistically catalyze D-xylose to produce FAL [45]. Cl- could catalyze the biomass-derived D-xylose enolization and facilitate the formation of FAL via dehydration. Thus, ZnCl2 could assist the UST-Sn-LS catalysis of corn stover to yield FAL.

2.3. Synthesis of FOL from FAL in ChCl:PEG10000–Water

2.3.1. Effects of ChCl:PEG10000 Load on Whole-Cell Bioreduction Activity

DES loading might have a profound effect on the biocatalysis [52,53]. The SF whole cells harboring NADPH-dependent reductase (CgCR) could be employed to biologically transform FAL to FOL in ChCl:PEG10000–water medium, and the effects of different ChCl:PEG10000 loading (0–60 wt%) were tested on the FAL-reducing activity (Figure 9). Upon increasing ChCl:PEG10000 from 0 to 30 wt%, the FAL-reducing activity was clearly raised. In the range of 10–30 wt%, the biological reduction activity increased by 1.4–1.6-fold compared to control. It is known that the limitation of FAL solubility in the water phase might confine the biocatalytic reaction. It is likely that these loadings of DES ChCl:PEG1000 (10–30 wt%) facilitate the substrate diffusion and thus enhance the biotransformation. From 30 wt% to 60 wt%, the activity decreased slightly. At 60 wt% of ChCl:PEG10000, similar bioreductive activity was found compared to the control without the addition of ChCl:PEG10000. Obviously, 1–60 wt% of ChCl:PEG10000 had no inhibition on the bioreduction activity of SF cells. An excessive ChCl:PEG10000 (over 20 wt%) might affect the contact opportunity of substrate FAL to SF cell biocatalyst, which results in a decrease of FOL formation from 30 wt% to 60 wt%. Obviously, the ChCl:PEG10000 load chosen at 20 wt% could significantly enhance the biological reduction activity. To establish the one-pot chemoenzymatic hybrid conversion process of biomass into FOL, ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) was used as a reaction medium.

2.3.2. Effects of NADP+ Load and Co-Substrate Glucose Dosage on Whole-Cell Bioreduction

To efficiently reduce carbonyl/aldehyde chemicals into NADPH-dependent alcohols of the reductase biocatalyst, it is of importance to obtain the optimum NADP+ dose. As the NADP+-to-FAL molar ratio was raised from 0:1 to 1:1 (μmol/mmol), the FAL-reducing activity increased considerably (Figure 10a). As the ratio from 1:1 to 3:1 (μmol/mmol) was chosen, the reduction activity weakened gradually. The suitable NADP+ load was 1.0 μmol NADP+ per mmol FAL (Figure 10a). The co-substrate glucose load can significantly affect biological reduction activity [18]. When the molar ratio of glucose-to-FAL increased from 0 to 1.5:1 (mol/mol), the reduction activity enhanced significantly (Figure 10b). As this ratio was raised from 1.5:1 to 3:1 (mol/mol), the reduction activity weakened slightly. It is likely that a high load of glucose can result in an increase in the reaction medium’s viscosity and confine the biological reduction. Thus, the suitable glucose load was 1.5 mol glucose per mol FAL.

2.3.3. Effects of Reaction Temperature and Medium pH on Whole-Cell Bioreduction Activity

It was known that medium pH and biocatalytic temperature could significantly influence the FAL-reducing activity [17]. In ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt), the effects of performance temperature (25–45 °C) and medium pH (6.0–8.0) on FAL-reducing activity were tested using whole-cell SF (50 g/L, wet weight) as a biocatalyst. The FAL-reducing pH (6.0–8.0) had an obvious influence on the biological reduction, and the maximum activity was observed at pH 6.5. A pH that is too low or too high may inactivate reductase denaturation. It was observed that the FAL-reducing reaction temperature significantly influenced the biological reduction activity. When the performance temperature was increased from 25 °C to 35 °C, the biocatalytic activity enhanced gradually. The highest FAL-reducing activity was observed at 35 °C. Increasing the catalytic temperature from 35 °C to 50 °C, the FAL-reducing activity weakened considerably. A higher FAL-reducing temperature (>35 °C) would cause the destruction of the spatial structure of reductase and the inactivation of reductase. The biocatalytic activity reached the maximum value at pH 6.5 (Figure 10c) and 35 °C (Figure 10d). Distinct from the chemo-selective reduction of FAL into FOL [44], the biological reduction of FAL is regarded as an eco-friendly route for the production of FOL under the eco-friendly performance condition.

2.3.4. Effects of FAL Dosage on Whole-Cell Bioreduction Activity

A different load of FAL (50–350 mM) was biological transformed into FOL with SF cells in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) (Figure 11). No obvious substrate inhibition was detected when the FAL loading was in the range of 50–200 mM. The transformation of 50–200 mM FAL took 2–6 h, and a 100% FOL yield was obtained. An excessive load of FAL (>200 mM) would weaken the biocatalytic synthesis of FOL. After the transformation of 350 mM FAL for 4 h, FOL was obtained in the yield of 74.3%, and no further FOL was generated after 4 h.

2.4. Transformation of Corn Stover to FOL in ChCl:PEG10000–Water

The combination of chemocatalytic and biocatalytic reactions leading to the one-pot transformation process is an attractive approach in the valorization of biomass into valuable biobased chemicals [39,40]. Time courses for catalyzing corn stover into FOL were monitored during the cascade reaction under the optimum performance conditions. In 40 mL water, 75 g/L of milled corn stover (3.0 g) (0.894 g glucan, 1.02 g xylan, and 0.51 g lignin), 0.6 g ZnCl2 and 0.48 g AT-Sn-WLS (1.2 wt%) were placed to an autoclave (100 mL, 300 rpm). At 170 °C, liquor A containing 110.5 mM FAL (0.42 g) formed within 30 min in 40 mL ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt), and 1.6 g corn stover residue (0.59 g glucan, 0.20 g xylan, and 0.128 g lignin) remained. This mixture was regulated to pH 7.0 and further biologically transformed with SF cells (2.5 g wet weight) at 35 °C. The diluted FAL solution (51.4 mL, 0.42 g FAL) was completely transformed to FOL (0.42 g) (Figure 12), with a productivity of 0.41 g FOL per g xylan in corncob.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

NADP+ (≥99%), furfural (FAL) (≥99%), furfuryl alcohol (FOL) (≥99%), and other chemicals were bought from Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and used without any further purification.

3.2. Synthesis of FAL from Corn Stover

At room temperature, the milled WLS powder (160.0 g) was immersed in 600 mL NaOH (500 mM) ethanol solution for 4 h. The alkali-treated WLS (AT-WLS) was then separated by simple filtration, washed with distilled water to neutral, and oven-dried (60 °C). The prepared AT-WLS powder was immersed in 300 mL of ethanol containing 40 g SnCl4·5H2O, and the pH was regulated to 6.0 by adding ammonia (25.0 wt%). The formed colloidal solution was oven-dried at 70 °C for 36 h and 90 °C for 36 h. This prepared powder was immersed in 4 M H2SO4 for sulfonation at 60 °C. After the sulfonation for 4 h, the sulfonated material was filtered, oven-dried for 15 h at 90 °C, and calcined at 550 °C for 4 h. The formed catalyst AT-Sn-WLS was further used to transform the biomass into FAL.
PEG10000 was used as a hydrogen donor. Choline chloride (ChCl) was also utilized as a hydrogen donor. The PEG10000 and ChCl were placed into a 100 mL container in a molar ratio of 1:1. After incubation at 80 °C by stirring (500 rpm) for 20 min, DES ChCl:PEG10000 was collected for further use. Corn stover (CS) powder (29.8 wt% glucan, 34.0 wt% xylan, and 17.0 wt% lignin) was transformed to FAL with AT-Sn-WLS (0–6 wt%) in a reactor (Shanghai Yuezhong Instrument Co., Zhenjiang, China) at 160–190 °C for 5–50 min in DES ChCl:PEG10000–water (0:100–50:50, wt/wt). Based on the weight of xylan in the biomass, the yield of FAL was calculated as follows:
FAL   yield   % = FAL   formed × 0.88 Xylan   in   biomass   g × 150 96 × 100

3.3. Whole-Cell Bioreduction of FAL into FOL

Cells of recombinant E. coli SF containing aldehyde reductase (CgCR) were cultivated and harvested as previously reported [44]. The biological reduction of commercial FAL was conducted as follows: in DES ChCl:PEG10000–water (0:100–60:40, wt/wt), whole-cell reduction of FAL (50–350 mM) was conducted at the designed performance temperature (25–50 °C) and pH (100 mM KH2PO4-K2HPO4 buffer, pH 6.0–8.0) in the presence of metal chloride salt types (0.5 mM), NADP+ (0–3 mmol NADP+/mol FAL), and glucose (0–3 mol glucose/mol FAL). FAL and FOL were quantified with HPLC. The FOL yield was defined as follows:
FOL   yield   % = FOL   formed   mM Initial   FAL   mM × 100

3.4. Analytical Method

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (Thermo Electron Co., Waltham, MA, USA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), thermogravimetric analysis (TA) (Mettler Toledo AG, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku Co., Akishimashi, Japan) were used to measure the AT-Sn-WLS. The concentration of FAL or FOL were quantified with HPLC (LC-2030C, Kyoto, Japan) using an Athena C18 column (4.6 mm× 250 mm, 5 μm) eluted with a mobile phase (20 v% methanol, 80 v% water, and 0.10 wt% trifluoroacetic acid) at the flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. FAL and FOL were detected at 254 nm and 210 nm, respectively.

4. Conclusions

The efficient transformation of the available renewable biomacromolecules to high-value biobased chemicals is a sustainable and eco-friendly energy technology. This work developed a sustainable and efficient approach for the transformation of corn stover to FOL in a cascade reaction with AT-Sn-WLS catalysts and SF cells in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt). Firstly, waste lobster shell (WLS) containing chitin was used as biobased support to prepare the sulfonated tin-based heterogeneous catalyst (AT-Sn-WLS), which was effectively utilized to transform the hemicellulose in corn stover into FAL (110.5 mM) under the optimized performance conditions. Subsequently, the corn stover-derived FAL was biologically transformed into FOL with SF cells harboring reductase under mild bioreaction conditions. Finally, one efficient tandem conversion by bridging a chemocatalysis and a mild biocatalysis was developed for the sustainable conversion of biomacromolecules into FOL in a benign DES ChCl:PEG10000–water system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, writing—original draft preparation, D.X.; formal analysis and investigation, W.T.; resources and data curation, Z.T.; writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was kindly supported by the Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering (2022-007).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Analysis and Testing Center (Changzhou University) for the analysis of solid acid with FTIR, SEM, XRD, BET analysis, and TG.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

WLSwaste lobster shell
CScorn stove
FALfurfural
FOLfurfuryl alcohol
DESdeep eutectic solvent
PEGpoly ethylene glycol
ADHaldehyde reductase
XRDX-ray diffraction
TGthermogravimetric analysis
SEMscanning electron microscopy
FTIRFourier-transform infrared spectroscopy

References

  1. Tuck, C.-O.; Pérez, E.; Horváth, I.-T.; Sheldon, R.-A.; Poliakoff, M. Valorization of biomass: Deriving more value from waste. Science 2012, 337, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kucherov, F.A.; Romashov, L.V.; Galkin, K.I.; Ananikov, V.P. Chemical transformations of biomass-derived C6-furanic platform chemicals for sustainable energy research, materials science, and synthetic building blocks. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 8064–8092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gallezot, P. Conversion of biomass to selected chemical products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1538–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Isci, A.; Kaltschmitt, M. Recovery and recycling of deep eutectic solvents in biomass conversions: A review. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 12, S197–S226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, P.; Zhang, Z.H. One-pot catalytic conversion of carbohydrates into furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 3694–3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Q.; Ma, C.; Di, J.; Ni, J.; He, Y.-C. Catalytic valorization of biomass for furfuryl alcohol by novel deep eutectic solvent-silica chemocatalyst and newly constructed reductase biocatalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 347, 126376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kochermann, J.; Schreiber, J.; Klemm, M. Conversion of D-xylose and hemicellulose in water/ethanol mixtures. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 12323–12330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ni, J.; Di, J.; Ma, C.; He, Y.C. Valorisation of corncob into furfuryl alcohol and furoic acid via chemoenzymatic cascade catalysis. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2021, 8, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liao, X.; Jia, P.; Wang, T. Furfural: A promising platform compound for sustainable production of C-4 and C-5 chemicals. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 7621–7640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y.; Ma, C.J.; Huang, C.X.; Fu, Y.; Chang, J. Efficient conversion of xylose into furfural using sulfonic acid-functionalized metal-organic frameworks in a biphasic system. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 16628–16634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Isikgor, F.H.; Becer, C.R. Lignocellulosic biomass: A sustainable platform for the production of bio-based chemicals and polymers. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 4497–4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, P.; Liao, X.; Ma, C.; Li, Q.; Li, A.; He, Y. Chemoenzymatic conversion of corncob to furfurylamine via tandem catalysis with tin-based solid acid and transaminase biocatalyst. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 17636–17642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, T.; Li, W.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Ma, Q.; Jameel, H.; Chang, H.-M.; Ma, L. Catalytic conversion of xylose and corn stalk into furfural over carbon solid acid catalyst in gamma-valerolactone. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 209, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, X.; Qiu, M.; Tang, Y.; Yang, J.; Shen, F.; Qi, X.; Yu, Y. Synthesis of sulfonated lignin-derived ordered mesoporous carbon for catalytic production of furfural from xylose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 187, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, Z.; Reznicek, W.-D.; Wan, C. Aqueous Choline Chloride: A Novel Solvent for Switchgrass Fractionation and Subsequent Hemicellulose Conversion into Furfural. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 6910–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Delbecq, F.; Wang, Y.; Muralidhara, A.; El Ouardi, K.; Marlair, G.; Len, C. Hydrolysis of hemicellulose and derivatives-A review of recent advances in the production of furfural. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Choudhary, V.; Pinar, A.B.; Sandler, S.I.; Vlachos, D.G.; Lobo, R.F. Xylose isomerization to xylulose and its dehydration to furfural in aqueous media. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 1724–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Montes, V.; Miñambres, J.F.; Khalilov, A.N.; Boutonnet, M.; Marinas, J.M.; Urbano, F.J.; Maharramov, A.M.; Marinas, A. Chemoselective hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol on ZrO2 systems synthesized through the microemulsion method. Catal. Today 2018, 306, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiménez-Gómez, C.P.; Cecilia, J.A.; Durán-Martín, D.; Moreno-Tost, R.; Santamaría-González, J.; Mérida-Robles, J.; Mariscal, R.; Maireles-Torres, P. Gas-phase hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol over Cu/ZnO catalysts. J. Catal. 2016, 336, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fulajtárova, K.; Soták, T.; Hronec, M.; Vávra, I.; Dobročka, E.; Omastová, M. Aqueous phase hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol over Pd–Cu catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 2015, 502, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Li, B.; Han, G.-Q.; Liu, X.-W.; Cao, Z.; Jiang, D.-E.; Sun, Y.-J. Electrocatalytic synthesis of heterocycles from biomass-derived furfuryl alcohols. Nat. Commun. 2021, 8, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hronec, M.; Fulajtarova, K.; Sotak, T. Highly selective rearrangement of furfuryl alcohol to cyclopentanone. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 154, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cao, Q.; Zhang, W.; Luo, S.-J.; Guo, R.-B.; Xu, D. Synthesis of furanic ethers from furfuryl alcohol for biofuel production. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 12725–12733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salnikova, K.-E.; Matveeva, V.-G.; Larichev, Y.-V.; Bykov, A.-V.; Demidenko, G.-N.; Shkileva, I.P.; Sulman, M.-G. The liquid phase catalytic hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol. Catal. Today 2019, 329, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ruelens, W.; Koolen, G.; Gricourt, B.; van Vuure, A.-W.; Smet, M. Co-polymerisation of furfuryl alcohol for furan resins with increased toughness. Mater. Lett. 2022, 328, 133025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maderuelo-Solera, R.; Lopez-Asensio, R.; Cecilia, J.-A.; Jimenez-Gomez, C.-P.; Garcia-Sancho, C.; Moreno-Tost, R.; Maireles-Torres, P. Catalytic transfer hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol over calcined MgFe hydrotalcites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 183, 105351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Putrakumar, B.; Seelam, P.-K.; Srinivasarao, G.; Rajan, K.; Rajesh, R.; Rao, K.-R.; Liang, T. High performance and sustainable copper-modified hydroxyapatite catalysts for catalytic transfer hydrogenation of furfural. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kuhaudomlap, S.; Mekasuwandumrong, O.; Praserthdam, P.; Lee, K.-M.; Jones, C.-W.; Panpranot, J. Influence of highly stable Ni2+ species in Ni phyllosilicate catalysts on selective hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol. ACS Omega 2022, 8, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Meng, X.; Yang, Y.; Chen, L.; Xu, M.; Zhang, X.; Wei, M.-A. Control over hydrogenation selectivity of furfural via tuning exposed facet of Ni catalysts. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4226–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, K.; Wang, J.; Li, C. Intelligent microbial cell factory with tolerance for green biological manufacturing. Synth. Biol. J. 2020, 1, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Q.; Di, J.; Liao, X.; Ni, J.; Li, Q.; He, Y.-C.; Ma, C.L. Exploration of benign deep eutectic solvent-water systems for the highly efficient production of furfurylamine from sugarcane bagasse via chemoenzymatic cascade catalysis. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 8154–8168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, H.; Luan, Z.J.; Zheng, G.W.; Xu, J.H. Efficient Synthesis of Chiral Indolines using an Imine Reductase from Paenibacillus lactis. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 1692–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, M.; Hu, P.F.; Zheng, Y.C.; Zheng, B.B.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, Z.J.; Xu, J.H. Structure-guided engineering of Pseudomonas dacunhae L-aspartate ß-decarboxylase for L-homophenylalanine synthesis. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 13876–13879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, J.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, J.; Liu, X.; Xu, J.; He, B.; Wu, B.; Zhang, J. Asymmetric whole-cell bioreduction of sterically bulky 2-benzoylpyridine derivatives in aqueous hydrophilic ionic liquid media. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 316, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alejandra, R.M.; Rache, L.Y.; Brijaldo, M.H.; Romanelli, G.P.; Martinez, J.J. Biocatalytic transformation of furfural into furfuryl alcohol using resting cells of Bacillus cereus. Catal. Today 2021, 372, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pan, L.; Li, Q.; Tao, Y.; Ma, C.; Chai, H.; Ai, Y.; He, Y. An efficient chemoenzymatic strategy for valorisation of corncob to furfuryl alcohol in CA: Betaine-water. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 186, 115203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ji, L.; Tang, Z.Y.; Yang, D.; Ma, C.L.; He, Y.C. Improved one-pot synthesis of furfural from corn stalk with heterogeneous catalysis using corn stalk as biobased carrier in deep eutectic solvent–water system. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 340, 125691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Y.Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, P.Q.; Ma, C.L.; Xu, J.H.; He, Y.C. Catalytic conversion of corncob to furfuryl alcohol in tandem reaction with tin-loaded sulfonated zeolite and NADPH-dependent reductase biocatalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 320, 124267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, X.-Y.; Lu, X.-B.; Hu, W.-X.; Hu, H.-C.; Chen, J.-G.; Xiong, j.; Lu, L.-F.; Yu, Z.-H.; Si, C.-L. Phosphotungstic acid functionalized biochar for furfural production from corncob. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 229, 107178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, Y.; Huang, M.; Tang, W.; Ma, C. Improving enzymatic hydrolysis of sunflower straw pretreated by deep eutectic solvent with different carboxylic acids as hydrogen bond donors. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 193, 116157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Y.; Zhao, D.; Rodríguez-Padrón, D.; Len, C. Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of furfural. Catalysts 2019, 9, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, R.Q.; Liang, X.F.; Shen, F.; Qiu, M.; Yang, J.R.; Qi, X.H. Mechanochemical synthesis of sulfonated palygorskite solid acid catalysts for selective catalytic conversion of xylose to furfural. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, R.; Li, Q.; Di, J.; Li, Q.; He, Y.; Ma, C. Improved 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfurylamine production from D-fructose-derived 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by a robust double mutant Aspergillus terreus ω-transaminase biocatalyst in a betaine-formic acid medium. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 193, 116199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, Z.; Wan, C. A novel deep eutectic solvent/acetonebiphasic system for high-yield furfural production. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 8, 100318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Enslow, K.R.; Bell, A.T. The role of metal halides in enhancing the dehydration of xylose to furfural. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Bodachivskyi, I.; Kuzhiumparambil, U.; Williams, D.-B.-G. Towards furfural from the reaction of cellulosic biomass in zinc chloride hydrate solvents. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 146, 112179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kumari, S.; Kumar Annamareddy, S.H.; Abanti, S.; Kumar Rath, P. Physicochemical properties and characterization of chitosan synthesized from fish scales, crab and shrimp shells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 1697–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Srinivasan, H.; Kanayairam, V.; Ravichandran, R. Chitin and chitosan preparation from shrimp shells Penaeus monodon and its human ovarian cancer cell line, PA-1. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gavaskar, D.S.; Nagaraju, P.; Vijayakumar, Y.; Reddy, P.S.; Ramana Reddy, M.V. Low-cost ultra-sensitive SnO2-based ammonia sensor synthesized by hydrothermal method. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2020, 8, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Liu, M.; Wang, B.; Xu, L.; Jiang, K.; Fan, S.; Sun, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, K. Ultrafast self-heating synthesis of robust heterogeneous nanocarbides for high current density hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. He, Y.-C.; Liu, F.; Di, J.-H.; Ding, Y.; Gao, D.-Z.; Zhang, D.-P.; Tao, Z.-C.; Chong, G.-G.; Huang, M.-Z.; Ma, C.-L. Effective pretreatment of dilute NaOH-soaked chestnut shell with glycerol-HClO4-water media: Structural characterization, enzymatic saccharification, and ethanol fermentation. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 39, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wu, M.; Di, J.; Gong, L.; He, Y.; Ma, C.; Deng, Y. Enhanced adipic acid production from sugarcane bagasse by a rapid room temperature pretreatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 452, 139320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pätzold, M.; Siebenhaller, S.; Kara, S.; Liese, A.; Syldatk, C.; Holtmann, D. Deep eutectic solvents as efficient solvents in biocatalysis. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 943–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. SEM characterization of raw LS (a) and UST-Sn-LS (b).
Figure 1. SEM characterization of raw LS (a) and UST-Sn-LS (b).
Catalysts 13 00467 g001
Figure 2. FTIR characterization of raw LS and UST-Sn-LS in the range of 4000–500 cm−1.
Figure 2. FTIR characterization of raw LS and UST-Sn-LS in the range of 4000–500 cm−1.
Catalysts 13 00467 g002
Figure 3. XRD characterization of raw LS and UST-Sn-LS. The 2θ angle was scanned between 20° and 70°.
Figure 3. XRD characterization of raw LS and UST-Sn-LS. The 2θ angle was scanned between 20° and 70°.
Catalysts 13 00467 g003
Figure 4. TG of UST-Sn-LS at a temperature ramping of 10 °C min−1 from 50 to 750 °C.
Figure 4. TG of UST-Sn-LS at a temperature ramping of 10 °C min−1 from 50 to 750 °C.
Catalysts 13 00467 g004
Figure 5. Effects of ChCl:PEG10000 load (0–50 wt%) on the FAL formation (corn stover 75 g/L, solid acid 1.2 wt%, 170 °C, 30 min).
Figure 5. Effects of ChCl:PEG10000 load (0–50 wt%) on the FAL formation (corn stover 75 g/L, solid acid 1.2 wt%, 170 °C, 30 min).
Catalysts 13 00467 g005
Figure 6. Effects of solid acid dosage (0–6 wt%) on the FAL formation in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) (CS 75 g/L, 170 °C, 30 min).
Figure 6. Effects of solid acid dosage (0–6 wt%) on the FAL formation in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) (CS 75 g/L, 170 °C, 30 min).
Catalysts 13 00467 g006
Figure 7. Effects of reaction temperature (160, 170, 180, and 190 °C) and reaction time (5–50 min) on the FAL generation in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) (CS 75 g/L, solid acid 1.2 wt%).
Figure 7. Effects of reaction temperature (160, 170, 180, and 190 °C) and reaction time (5–50 min) on the FAL generation in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) (CS 75 g/L, solid acid 1.2 wt%).
Catalysts 13 00467 g007
Figure 8. Effects of chlorides (15 g/L) on the FAL production in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) (corn stover 75 g/L, solid acid 1.2 wt%, 170 °C, 30 min) (a); effects of ZnCl2 loading (0–30 g/L) on the FAL production in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) (corn stover 75 g/L, solid acid 1.2 wt%, 170 °C, 30 min) (b).
Figure 8. Effects of chlorides (15 g/L) on the FAL production in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) (corn stover 75 g/L, solid acid 1.2 wt%, 170 °C, 30 min) (a); effects of ZnCl2 loading (0–30 g/L) on the FAL production in ChCl:PEG10000–water (20:80, wt/wt) (corn stover 75 g/L, solid acid 1.2 wt%, 170 °C, 30 min) (b).
Catalysts 13 00467 g008
Figure 9. Effects of ChCl:PEG10000 load (0–60 wt%) on the biological reduction [NADP+ (1 mmol NADP+ per mol FAL, glucose (1.5 mol glucose per mol FAL), pH 7.0, 35 °C]. In the absence of ChCl:PEG10000, the bioreduction activity was defined as 100%. The FAL-reducing activity was quantified based on the bioreduction reaction rate.
Figure 9. Effects of ChCl:PEG10000 load (0–60 wt%) on the biological reduction [NADP+ (1 mmol NADP+ per mol FAL, glucose (1.5 mol glucose per mol FAL), pH 7.0, 35 °C]. In the absence of ChCl:PEG10000, the bioreduction activity was defined as 100%. The FAL-reducing activity was quantified based on the bioreduction reaction rate.
Catalysts 13 00467 g009
Figure 10. Effects of NADP+ load (NADP+/FAL 0–3 µmol/mmol, pH 7.0, temperature 35 °C, co-substrate glucose/FAL 1.5 mol/mol) (a), co-substrate glucose load (glucose/FAL 0–3 mol/mol, pH 7.0, temperature 35 °C, NADP+/FAL 1 µmol/mmol) (b), medium pH (6–8) (temperature 35 °C, glucose/FAL 1.5 mol/mol, NADP+/FAL 1 µmol/mmol) (c), and bioreduction temperature (25–50 °C, pH 7.0, glucose/FAL 1.5 mol/mol, NADP+/FAL 1 µmol/mmol) (d) on the FAL-reducing activity.
Figure 10. Effects of NADP+ load (NADP+/FAL 0–3 µmol/mmol, pH 7.0, temperature 35 °C, co-substrate glucose/FAL 1.5 mol/mol) (a), co-substrate glucose load (glucose/FAL 0–3 mol/mol, pH 7.0, temperature 35 °C, NADP+/FAL 1 µmol/mmol) (b), medium pH (6–8) (temperature 35 °C, glucose/FAL 1.5 mol/mol, NADP+/FAL 1 µmol/mmol) (c), and bioreduction temperature (25–50 °C, pH 7.0, glucose/FAL 1.5 mol/mol, NADP+/FAL 1 µmol/mmol) (d) on the FAL-reducing activity.
Catalysts 13 00467 g010
Figure 11. Biological reduction of 50–350 mM FAL into FOL with SF whole cells, NADP+ (1 mmol NADP+/mol FAL), and glucose (1.5 mol glucose per mol FAL) in ChCl:PEG10000–water (pH 7.0, 35 °C).
Figure 11. Biological reduction of 50–350 mM FAL into FOL with SF whole cells, NADP+ (1 mmol NADP+/mol FAL), and glucose (1.5 mol glucose per mol FAL) in ChCl:PEG10000–water (pH 7.0, 35 °C).
Catalysts 13 00467 g011
Figure 12. Time course of bioreduction of dilute corn stover-derived FAL with SF whole cells at pH 7.0 and 35 °C.
Figure 12. Time course of bioreduction of dilute corn stover-derived FAL with SF whole cells at pH 7.0 and 35 °C.
Catalysts 13 00467 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, D.; Tang, W.; Tang, Z.; He, Y. An Efficient Strategy for Chemoenzymatic Conversion of Corn Stover to Furfuryl Alcohol in Deep Eutectic Solvent ChCl:PEG10000−Water Medium. Catalysts 2023, 13, 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13030467

AMA Style

Xu D, Tang W, Tang Z, He Y. An Efficient Strategy for Chemoenzymatic Conversion of Corn Stover to Furfuryl Alcohol in Deep Eutectic Solvent ChCl:PEG10000−Water Medium. Catalysts. 2023; 13(3):467. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13030467

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Daozhu, Wei Tang, Zhengyu Tang, and Yucai He. 2023. "An Efficient Strategy for Chemoenzymatic Conversion of Corn Stover to Furfuryl Alcohol in Deep Eutectic Solvent ChCl:PEG10000−Water Medium" Catalysts 13, no. 3: 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13030467

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop