Next Article in Journal
Transition Metal B-Site Substitutions in LaAlO3 Perovskites Reorient Bio-Ethanol Conversion Reactions
Next Article in Special Issue
Environmentally Friendly Route for Fabricating Conductive Agent for Lithium-Ion Batteries: Carbon Nanoparticles Derived from Polyethylene
Previous Article in Journal
An Electrocatalytic Activity of AuCeO2/Carbon Catalyst in Fuel Cell Reactions: Oxidation of Borohydride and Reduction of Oxygen
Previous Article in Special Issue
Facile Aqueous–Phase Synthesis of Pd–FePt Core–Shell Nanoparticles for Methanol Oxidation Reaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Au–Cu Alloy Nanoparticles as Peroxidase Mimetics for H2O2 and Glucose Colorimetric Detection

1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea
2
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(3), 343; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11030343
Submission received: 29 January 2021 / Revised: 1 March 2021 / Accepted: 5 March 2021 / Published: 7 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmentally Friendly Applications of Nanocatalysts)

Abstract

:
The detection of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is essential in many research fields, including medical diagnosis, food safety, and environmental monitoring. In this context, Au-based bimetallic alloy nanomaterials have attracted increasing attention as an alternative to enzymes due to their superior catalytic activity. In this study, we report a coreduction synthesis of gold–copper (Au–Cu) alloy nanoparticles in aqueous phase. By controlling the amount of Au and Cu precursors, the Au/Cu molar ratio of the nanoparticles can be tuned from 1/0.1 to 1/2. The synthesized Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles show good peroxidase-like catalytic activity and high selectivity for the H2O2-mediated oxidation of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB, colorless) to TMB oxide (blue). The Au–Cu nanoparticles with an Au/Cu molar ratio of 1/2 exhibit high catalytic activity in the H2O2 colorimetric detection, with a limit of detection of 0.141 μM in the linear range of 1–10 μM and a correlation coefficient R2 = 0.991. Furthermore, the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles can also efficiently detect glucose in the presence of glucose oxidase (GOx), and the detection limit is as low as 0.26 μM.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), an essential representative of reactive oxygen species, plays a critical role in various biological processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration [1,2,3]. Moreover, H2O2 is a vital component in modern industries applications such as chemical synthesis, water treatment, and textile bleaching, in which H2O2 is used as a versatile and environmentally benign oxidant [4,5]. Meanwhile, H2O2 is also a byproduct of many enzymatic reactions in living beings. The generation and accumulation of H2O2 may cause several diseases, e.g., cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease, endangering the health and life of human beings [6]. Therefore, the detection of H2O2 is essential in various areas including medical diagnosis, food safety, and environmental monitoring [7,8,9].
In terms of H2O2 detection, numerous analytical strategies have been developed, such as optical sensing, electrochemical analysis, and colorimetric methods [10,11,12,13]. Among these, colorimetric methods show great potential in practical applications due to advantages including simplicity, low cost, and unsophisticated instrumentation [14,15,16,17]. In colorimetric assays, a natural enzyme is typically needed to develop an optical signal. However, practical applications of natural enzymes are restricted by their high cost and low stability against denaturation and protease [18,19]. Consequently, many studies have been devoted to the development of alternative approaches based on nanozymes, whose intrinsic properties such as large specific surface area, high stability, good durability, low cost, and tunable catalytic activity render them suitable for various practical applications [20,21,22]. Since the first Fe3O4-based nanozyme was reported [23], several kinds of nanomaterials have been developed, e.g., metallic oxide nanoparticles [24,25,26,27], carbon-based nanomaterials [28,29], and noble metal nanoparticles (Au, Ag, and Pt) [30,31,32,33].
Among these nanomaterials, Au nanoparticles are often used in fundamental research due to their good enzyme-like activities as both oxidase and peroxidase mimics [34]. However, naked Au nanoparticles generally show high chemical inertness in many catalytic reactions of enzyme mimics [35]. Moreover, aggregation of Au nanoparticles often occurs, reducing their catalytic efficiency and hampering their practical application. To circumvent these problems, Au-based bimetallic alloy nanomaterials have attracted significant attention because of their superior catalytic activity to that of their single-phase counterparts [36,37]. For example, Zhang et al. prepared Au–Ag alloy nanoboxes, which can be employed to detect H2O2 with a linear readout in a range of concentration from 5 × 10−2 M down to 5 × 10−7 M [38]. Li et al. developed Au–Pd bimetallic nanoparticles using a facile thermal coreduction method that exhibited linear responses of H2O2 in concentration ranges of 0.8 μM to 10 mM, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.16 μM [39]. Sui et al. synthesized an Au–Hg amalgam by introducing Hg2+ into Au nanoparticles, which showed an enhanced peroxidase-mimicking activity toward H2O2 and Hg2+ in a sensitive and selective method for colorimetric detection. The LOD was as low as 0.35 μM for H2O2 [40]. As can be extracted from these reports, Au-based bimetallic alloy nanomaterials with good dispersion degree and excellent enzyme-like performance are relevant for H2O2 detection in various research fields.
In this paper, we report a coreduction method for the synthesis of well-mixed Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles in aqueous phase, in which the Au/Cu ratio can be tuned from 1/0.1 to 1/2 by controlling the amount of Au and Cu precursors. In a typical colorimetric reaction, that is, the H2O2-mediated oxidation of the peroxidase substrate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB, colorless) to produce TMB oxide (TMBox, blue), the prepared Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles showed good peroxidase-mimicking catalytic activity. Meanwhile, using various common ions and substances as controls, the high selectivity in H2O2 detection of the synthesized Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles was demonstrated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Au–Cu Alloy Nanoparticles

The Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles were synthesized by coreducing Au and Cu precursors using L-ascorbic acid (AA) in the presence of poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI) solution in an aqueous phase system. The solution color changed from chartreuse to maroon after adding AA, which indicated the formation of nanoparticles. In this synthesis process, PEI served as a surfactant for the formation of nanosized particles and as a stabilizing agent to prevent the oxidation of Cu species in the nanoparticles [41,42]. By varying the amount of Au and Cu precursors, the molar ratio between Au and Cu in the nanoparticles was controlled from 1/0.1 (Au1Cu0.1) to 1/2 (Au1Cu2), as determined by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) (Table S1). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the nanoparticles depicted in Figure 1a–e revealed that the synthesized nanoparticles had a quasispherical morphology and an average size of around 62.4 nm for Au1Cu0.1, 63.2 nm for Au1Cu0.2, 64.8 nm for Au1Cu0.5, 79.5 nm for Au1Cu1, and 101.3 nm for Au1Cu2 (Figure S1). The elemental distribution of the nanoparticles was also analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) mapping, which indicated that Au and Cu were well dispersed in the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles (Figure S2). Figure 1f shows the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the nanoparticles with different Au/Cu molar rations, which indicate that all the nanoparticles had an alloy structure based on Au (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) file card no. 04-0784) rather than Cu (JCPDS file card no. 04-0836). In the XRD patterns, all XRD peaks exhibited most likely were due to the insertion of small Cu atoms in the Au crystal lattice, and no XRD peaks of Cu or CuO were observed. [43] In addition, the UV-VIS absorption spectrum exhibited the characteristic absorption of Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles with different Au/Cu molar ratio in the UV region (Figure S3) These observations demonstrated that the Au–Cu nanoparticles formed an alloy structure and were well stabilized in the aqueous solution, and that no aggregation occurred.

2.2. H2O2 Detection

In previous reports, the peroxidase-like catalytic properties of Au-based alloy nanoparticles have been explored by different detection strategies. In the present work, we performed the catalytic activity analysis of the prepared Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles by colorimetric method using TMB as a chromogenic substrate [44]. As previous reported, the catalytic activity of enzyme-mimicking nanoparticles is dependent on pH and temperature. Thus, the catalytic activity of the Au–Cu nanoparticles was investigated under different pH and temperature conditions. The reaction solution pH- and temperature-dependent curves are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The results show that the highest absorbance intensities were at pH = 4 and room temperature, respectively. Accordingly, under these conditions, we confirmed that there was no reaction in the absence of the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles (Figure 4). When the reaction was conducted in the presence of the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles, the intensity of the absorbance peak at around 652 nm increased, which is characteristic of TMBox, and indicated that the synthesized Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles possessed catalytic activity in TMB oxidation by generating OH radicals from H2O2, thereby causing the color change.
Monitoring of the UV-VIS absorption-peak evolution of the TMB reaction solutions containing Au1Cu0.1, Au1Cu0.2, Au1Cu0.5, Au1Cu1, and Au1Cu2 showed that the UV-VIS absorbance intensity increased with the H2O2 concentrations (Figure 5a–e and Figure S4). Wide detection ranges from 1 μM to 10 mM was observed for all Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles. According to the equation LOD = 3δ/k [45], where δ is the standard deviation of 10 replicate measurements of absorbance of the blank signal (absorbance of TMB solution without H2O2), and k is the slope of the calibration curve, the LODs for H2O2 were calculated to be 0.609 μM for Au1Cu0.1, 0.508 μM for Au1Cu0.2, 0.274 μM for Au1Cu0.5, 0.178 μM for Au1Cu1, and 0.141 μM for Au1Cu2. The lowest LOD of Au1Cu2 may be related to the increase in Cu content, since many reports have demonstrated that not only Au, but also Cu+ nanomaterials possess peroxidase activity [46]. In addition, a comparison with other nanomaterials exhibiting activity for H2O2 detection demonstrated that the present Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles had low LOD and a wide detection range (Table 1).
To gain more insight into the catalytic properties of the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles, we also prepared single Au nanoparticles and Cu nanoparticles by coreduction (Figure S5) and detected their catalytic activity under the same conditions, as shown in Figure 5f,g and Figure S6. The LOD of the Au nanoparticles and Cu nanoparticles were 1.97 μM and 4.55 μM, respectively, in the linear range of 10–100 μM. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles had a wider detection range and a lower LOD than the single derivatives (Figure 5h), indicating that the formation of the Au–Cu alloy is beneficial for peroxidase-like activity.

2.3. Selectivity Analysis

The catalytic performance of enzymes is determined by their selectivity and sensitivity for the detection of target substrates; therefore, the selectivity of enzyme mimetics is worth investigating. In this study, to determine the detection selectivity of the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles for H2O2, we performed control experiments using various common ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, PO43−, and Cl) and other substances (AA, glucose, and urea). These ions and substances can be usually found in human plasma and might influence the catalytic activity of the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles. As shown in Figure 6, these controls generated negligible UV-VIS absorbance compared with H2O2 in the colorimetric reaction, which is indicative of the high selectivity of the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles for H2O2 detection. In contrast, the tested ions, ascorbic acid, glucose, and urea, cannot directly generate OH radicals from H2O2 for TMB oxidation. As for glucose, the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles may also exhibit peroxidase-mimicking activity in the presence of glucose oxidase (GOx), because the GOx can decompose glucose to generate H2O2, thereby causing the colorimetric reaction in the presence of Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles. Therefore, we performed the comparison of absorbance intensity between TMB solution in the absence and in the presence of GOx by the colorimetric method, as shown in Figure 7. The results showed enhanced absorbance intensity in the presence of GOx, indicating that glucose detection can be performed in the presence of GOx.

2.4. Glucose Detection and Selectivity Analysis

Glucose oxidase (GOx) can promote the catalytic oxidation of glucose to produce H2O2. Therefore, the Au–Cu-based colorimetric method can be used for glucose detection in the presence of GOx. The typical UV-VIS absorption spectra of the TMB reaction solutions and glucose-concentration response curve for Au–Cu are shown in Figure 8 and Figure S7. The prepared Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles showed the lowest detection limit of 2.6 × 10–7 mol/L in the linear range of 2 to 10 μM for glucose detection, which was superior to that of several previously reported artificial enzymes (Table 2). Furthermore, the selectivity of glucose detection was investigated via control experiments. Several typical common glucose homologues (sucrose, lactose, maltose, and mannitol) and glucose were comparatively analyzed, and the results are presented in Figure 9. The absorption intensity was clearly higher in the presence of glucose than those of the control samples, indicating that the proposed Au–Cu based system exhibited high selectivity for glucose detection.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Copper sulfate (CuSO4), gold (Ⅲ) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O), AA, and PEI (Mw = 75000) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used to synthesize the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles. Sodium acetate (NaAc), acetic acid, TMB, H2O2 (30 wt%), HEPES, glucose, and GOx were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used in the peroxidase activity assay.

3.2. Characterization

A D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (XRD) was used for the crystal-structure characterization of the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles. For the morphological characterization, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using a JEM-2100F, JEOL microscope. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) analysis was performed using a JEM-2100F microscope operated at 200 kV for the elemental analysis. The UV-VIS absorption spectra were acquired using a Cary 60 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). An inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (Direct Reading Echelle ICP, LEEMAN, Hudson, NH, USA) was used to determine the Au/Cu molar ratio in the nanoparticles.

3.3. Preparation of Au–Cu Alloy Nanoparticles

A total of 10 mL of reaction system was prepared. First, an aqueous solution containing 10 mg of PEI was heated to 90 °C with magnetic stirring. Then, aqueous CuSO4 solution (0.1 M) and HAuCl4 solution (0.1 M) with different volumes were added to the PEI solution. After 5 min, 3 mL of AA (0.6 M) was added to the reaction mixture, and the resulting solution was heated at the same temperature for 5 min. The quasispherical morphology products were collected by centrifugation and washed three times with a mixture of deionized (DI) water and ethanol and redispersed in the DI water. The atomic ratio of Au/Cu was controlled by varying the volume of CuSO4 and HAuCl4 solutions (0.1 mL of CuSO4 and 1 mL of HAuCl4 solution for Au1Cu0.1; 0.2 mL of CuSO4 and 1 mL of HAuCl4 solution for Au1Cu0.2; 0.4 mL of CuSO4 and 1 mL of HAuCl4 solution for Au1Cu0.5; 1 mL of CuSO4 and 0.4 mL of HAuCl4 solution for Au1Cu1; 1.5 mL of CuSO4 and 1 mL of HAuCl4 solution for Au1Cu2).

3.4. Colorimetric Detection of H2O2 Using Au–Cu Alloy Nanoparticles as Peroxidase Mimetics

The colorimetric detection process was performed as follows. A total of 30 μL of an aqueous dispersion containing Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles (0.4 mg/mL), 200 μL of TMB solution (2.5 mM), and 200 μL of different concentrations of H2O2 were mixed with 1.5 mL of acetate buffer (20 mM, pH 4.0), and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 120 min. After the reaction, the solution was subjected to UV-VIS absorption spectroscopy analysis.

3.5. Selectivity of H2O2 Detection Using Au–Cu Alloy Nanoparticles as Peroxidase Mimetics

An analysis of the selectivity of the H2O2 detection by the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles was performed through the following process. A total of 30 μL of an aqueous dispersion containing Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles (0.4 mg/mL), 200 μL of TMB solution (2.5 mM), and 200 μL of H2O2 (10 mM) was added into 1.5 mL of acetate buffer (20 mM, pH 4.0). The resulting solution was then incubated at room temperature for 120 min. For the control experiments under the same conditions, the same number of common ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, PO43−, Cl) or substances (AA, glucose, urea) as that of H2O2 was added to the reaction system.

3.6. Colorimetric Detection and Selectivity Analysis of Glucose Using Au–Cu Nanoparticles as Peroxidase Mimetics

Glucose detection was performed as follows. First, 100 μL of glucose oxidase (GOx) (0.0032 g/mL) and 100 μL of the glucose solution (various concentrations) prepared in the HEPES buffer solution (pH 6.5) were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, 1.5 mL of the NaOAc buffer solution (pH 4), 100 μL of Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles (0.0004 g/mL), and 200 μL of the TMB (1 mM) solution were added to the above solution. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 120 min and was further used for performing the absorption spectroscopy measurement. As for the selectivity analysis, the glucose homologues (sucrose, lactose, maltose, and mannitol) were used in control experiments.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we synthesized five types of Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles with different Au/Cu ratios by a facile coreduction method. The synthesized Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles were able to act as peroxidase mimetics for H2O2 and glucose colorimetric detection with a LOD of 0.141 μM and 0.26 μM. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that both the catalytic activity and selectivity of Au-based nanocatalysts were enhanced by mixing Au and Cu into alloy catalysts with specific properties. We expect that the developed method can be extended to prepare other noble-metal-based alloy nanocatalysts.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/11/3/343/s1, Figure S1. Size distribution of (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b) Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, and (e) Au1Cu2 alloy nanoparticles; Figure S2. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry mapping of (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b)Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, and (e) Au1Cu2 alloy nanoparticles; Figure S3. Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra of (a) Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles, (b) Au nanoparticles, and (c) Cu nanoparticles. Figure S4. Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) solutions in the presence of different concentrations of H2O2 using (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b) Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, and (e) Au1Cu2 alloy nanoparticles as the peroxidase mimetics; Figure S5. Transmission electron microscopy images of (a) Au nanoparticles and (b) Cu nanoparticles; Figure S6. Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) solutions in the presence of different concentrations of H2O2 using (a) Au nanoparticles and (b) Cu nanoparticles as the peroxidase mimetics; Figure S7. Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) solutions in the presence of different concentration of glucose using (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b) Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, and (e) Au1Cu2 alloy nanoparticles as the peroxidase mimetics. Table S1. Inductively coupled plasma results of AuxCuy alloy nanoparticles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, synthesis, characterization, catalytic activity assay, and writing—original draft preparation, C.L.; supervision, methodology, further data analysis, and writing—review and editing, S.H.I. and T.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the NRF grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (NRF-2014R1A5A1009799, NRF-2020R1A2C1003885, NRF-2019R1A6C1010052, and NRF-2020M3A7B4002030).

Data Availability Statement

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, X.Y.; Wang, H.J.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y.Q. Functional Three-Dimensional Porous Conductive Polymer Hydrogels for Sensitive Electrochemiluminescence in Situ Detection of H2O2 Released from Live Cells. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 8462–8469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shi, Q.R.; Song, Y.; Zhu, C.Z.; Yang, H.P.; Du, D.; Lin, Y.H. Mesoporous Pt Nanotubes as a Novel Sensing Platform for Sensitive Detection of Intracellular Hydrogen Peroxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 24288–24295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shen, R.; Liu, P.P.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Yu, Z.; Chen, X.Y.; Zhou, L.; Nie, B.Q.; Zaczek, A.; Chen, J.; Liu, J. Sensitive Detection of Single-Cell Secreted H2O2 by Integrating a. Microfluidic Droplet Sensor and Au Nanoclusters. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 4478–4484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hage, R.; Lienke, A. Applications of transition-metal catalysts to textile and wood-pulp bleaching. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 206–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ciriminna, R.; Albanese, L.; Meneguzzo, F.; Pagliaro, M. Hydrogen Peroxide: A Key Chemical for Today’s Sustainable Development. Chemsuschem 2016, 9, 3374–3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, J.H.; Li, C.Y.; Qi, Y.F.; Guo, S.L.; Liang, X. Optimizing Colorimetric Assay Based on V2O5 Nanozymes for Sensitive Detection of H2O2 and Glucose. Sensors 2016, 16, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Baghayeri, M.; Zare, E.N.; Lakouraj, M.M. A simple hydrogen peroxide biosensor based on a novel electro-magnetic poly(p-phenylenediamine) @ Fe3O4 nanocomposite. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 55, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suarez, G.; Santschi, C.; Martin, O.J.F.; Slaveykova, V.I. Biosensor based on chemically designed anchorable cytochrome c for the detection of H2O2 released by aquatic cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 42, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lou, Z.R.; Li, P.; Sun, X.F.; Yang, S.Q.; Wang, B.S.; Han, K.L. A fluorescent probe for rapid detection of thiols and imaging of thiols reducing repair and H2O2 oxidative stress cycles in living cells. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 391–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, G.D.; Lin, Y.H. Amperometric glucose biosensor based on self-assembling glucose oxidase on carbon nanotubes. Electrochem. Commun. 2006, 8, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gong, T.T.; Liu, J.F.; Wu, Y.W.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, X.H.; Yuan, S.Q. Fluorescence enhancement of CdTe quantum dots by HBcAb-HRP for sensitive detection of H2O2 in human serum. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 92, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dickinson, B.C.; Chang, C.J. A targetable fluorescent probe for imaging hydrogen peroxide in the mitochondria of living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9638–9639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nasir, M.; Nawaz, M.H.; Latif, U.; Yaqub, M.; Hayat, A.; Rahim, A. An overview on enzyme-mimicking nanomaterials for use in electrochemical and optical assays. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 323–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lin, T.R.; Zhong, L.S.; Song, Z.P.; Guo, L.Q.; Wu, H.Y.; Guo, Q.Q.; Chen, Y.; Fu, F.F.; Chen, G.N. Visual detection of blood glucose based on peroxidase-like activity of WS2 nanosheets. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 62, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vazquez-Gonzalez, M.; Liao, W.C.; Gazelles, R.; Wang, S.; Yu, X.; Gutkin, V.; Willner, I. Mimicking Horseradish Peroxidase Functions Using Cu2+-Modified Carbon Nitride Nanoparticles or Cu2+-Modified Carbon Dots as Heterogeneous Catalysts. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3247–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, Q.Y.; Yang, Y.T.; Lv, X.T.; Ding, Y.A.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Jing, J.J.; Xu, C.X. One-step synthesis of uniform nanoparticles of porphyrin functionalized ceria with promising peroxidase mimetics for H2O2 and glucose colorimetric detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 240, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, H.K.; Xiao, J.Y.; Su, L.; Feng, T.; Lv, Q.Y.; Zhang, X.J. Oxidase-mimicking activity of the nitrogen-doped Fe3C@C composites. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 3882–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wulff, G. Enzyme-like catalysis by molecularly imprinted polymers. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. He, W.W.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, J.S.; Yin, J.J.; Wu, X.C.; Hu, X.N.; Zhang, K.; Liu, J.B.; Chen, C.Y.; Ji, Y.L.; et al. Au@Pt nanostructures as oxidase and peroxidase mimetics for use in immunoassays. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1139–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, S.; Tripathi, P.; Kumar, N.; Nara, S. Colorimetric sensing of malathion using palladium-gold bimetallic nanozyme. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 92, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jin, L.H.; Meng, Z.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Cai, S.J.; Zhang, Z.J.; Li, C.; Shang, L.; Shen, Y.H. Ultrasmall Pt Nanoclusters as Robust Peroxidase Mimics for Colorimetric Detection of Glucose in Human Serum. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 10027–10033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, J.; Meng, L.J.; Fei, Z.F.; Dyson, P.J.; Jing, X.N.; Liu, X. MnO2 nanosheets as an artificial enzyme to mimic oxidase for rapid and sensitive detection of glutathione. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 90, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gao, L.Z.; Zhuang, J.; Nie, L.; Zhang, J.B.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, N.; Wang, T.H.; Feng, J.; Yang, D.L.; Perrett, S.; et al. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, H.; Dong, Y.M.; Jiang, P.P.; Wang, G.L.; Zhang, J.J. Highly Dispersed CeO2 on TiO2 Nanotube: A Synergistic Nanocomposite with Superior Peroxidase-Like Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 6451–6461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, W.; Chen, J.; Feng, Y.B.; Hong, L.; Chen, Q.Y.; Wu, L.F.; Lin, X.H.; Xia, X.H. Peroxidase-like activity of water-soluble cupric oxide nanoparticles and its analytical application for detection of hydrogen peroxide and glucose. Analyst 2012, 137, 1706–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Andre, R.; Natalio, F.; Humanes, M.; Leppin, J.; Heinze, K.; Wever, R.; Schroder, H.C.; Muller, W.E.G.; Tremel, W. V2O5 Nanowires with an Intrinsic Peroxidase-Like Activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yan, X.; Song, Y.; Wu, X.L.; Zhu, C.Z.; Su, X.G.; Du, D.; Lin, Y.H. Oxidase-mimicking activity of ultrathin MnO2 nanosheets in colorimetric assay of acetylcholinesterase activity. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 2317–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, Y.F.; Xu, C.L.; Li, B.X.; Li, Y.B. In situ growth of positively charged gold nanoparticles on single-walled carbon nanotubes as a highly active peroxidase mimetic and its application in biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 43, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pogacean, F.; Socaci, C.; Pruneanu, S.; Biris, A.R.; Coros, M.; Magerusan, L.; Katona, G.; Turcu, R.; Borodi, G. Graphene based nanomaterials as chemical sensors for hydrogen peroxide—A comparison study of their intrinsic peroxidase catalytic behavior. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 213, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Han, L.; Li, C.C.; Zhang, T.; Lang, Q.L.; Liu, A.H. Au@Ag Heterogeneous Nanorods as Nanozyme Interfaces with Peroxidase-Like Activity and Their Application for One-Pot Analysis of Glucose at Nearly Neutral pH. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 14463–14470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chen, X.M.; Tian, X.T.; Su, B.Y.; Huang, Z.Y.; Chen, X.; Oyama, M. Au nanoparticles on citrate-functionalized graphene nanosheets with a high peroxidase-like performance. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 7449–7454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, J.N.; Liu, W.Q.; Wu, X.C.; Gao, X.F. Mechanism of pH-switchable peroxidase and catalase-like activities of gold, silver, platinum and palladium. Biomaterials 2015, 48, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Niu, X.H.; Chen, C.; Zhao, H.L.; Chai, Y.; Lan, M.B. Novel snowflake-like Pt-Pd bimetallic clusters on screen-printed gold nanofilm electrode for H2O2 and glucose sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 36, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lin, Y.H.; Ren, J.S.; Qu, X.G. Nano-Gold as Artificial Enzymes: Hidden Talents. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2014, 26, 4200–4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, S.; Chen, W.; Liu, A.L.; Hong, L.; Deng, H.H.; Lin, X.H. Comparison of the Peroxidase-Like Activity of Unmodified, Amino-Modified, and Citrate-Capped Gold Nanoparticles. ChemPhysChem 2012, 13, 1199–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, H.J.; Watanabe, T.; Okumura, M.; Haruta, M.; Toshima, N. Catalytically highly active top gold atom on palladium nanocluster. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, L.F.; Zhong, S.L.; Xu, A.W. Highly Branched Concave Au/Pd Bimetallic Nanocrystals with Superior Electrocatalytic Activity and Highly Efficient SERS Enhancement. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 645–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, Q.; Cobley, C.M.; Zeng, J.; Wen, L.P.; Chen, J.Y.; Xia, Y.N. Dissolving Ag from Au-Ag Alloy Nanoboxes with H2O2: A Method for Both Tailoring the Optical Properties and Measuring the H2O2 Concentration. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 6396–6400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Li, X.Y.; Du, X.Z. Molybdenum disulfide nanosheets supported Au-Pd bimetallic nanoparticles for non-enzymatic electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide and glucose. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 239, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sui, N.; Liu, F.Y.; Wang, K.; Xie, F.X.; Wang, L.N.; Tang, J.J.; Liu, M.H.; Yu, W.W. Nano Au-Hg amalgam for Hg2+ and H2O2 detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 252, 1010–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tang, Z.; Shahzad, A.; Kim, W.S.; Yu, T. Cost-effective aqueous-phase synthesis of long copper nanowires. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 83880–83884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tang, Z.; Kwon, H.; Yi, M.; Kim, K.; Han, J.W.; Kim, W.S.; Yu, T. Role of halide ions for controlling morphology of copper nanocrystals in aqueous solution. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 4655–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Denton, A.R.; Ashcroft, N.W. Vegard’s law. Phys. Rev. A 1991, 43, 3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, Y.; Purich, D.L.; Wu, C.; Wu, Y.; Chen, T.; Cui, C.; Zhang, L.; Cansiz, S.; Hou, W.; Wang, Y.; et al. Ionic Functionalization of Hydrophobic Colloidal Nanoparticles to Form Ionic Nanoparticles with Enzymelike Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14952–14958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shrivastava, A.; Gupta, V.B. Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chron. Young Sci. 2011, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sun, Y.; Tian, P.; Ding, D.; Yang, Z.; Wang, W.; Xin, H.; Han, Y.F. Revealing the active species of Cu-based catalysts for heterogeneous Fenton reaction. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 258, 117985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zeng, J.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, J.Y.; Xia, Y.N. A Comparison Study of the Catalytic Properties of Au-Based Nanocages, Nanoboxes, and Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, H.; Ding, Y.N.; Yang, B.C.; Liu, Z.X.; Liu, Q.Y.; Zhang, X. Colorimetric and ultrasensitive detection of H2O2 based on Au/Co3O4-CeOx nanocomposites with enhanced peroxidase-like performance. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 271, 336–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ding, Y.N.; Yang, B.C.; Liu, H.; Liu, Z.X.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, X.W.; Liu, Q.Y. FePt-Au ternary metallic nanoparticles with the enhanced peroxidase-like activity for ultrafast colorimetric detection of H2O2. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 259, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, J.X.; Wu, W.W.; Huang, L.; Ma, Q.; Dong, S.J. Self-Indicative Gold Nanozyme for H2O2 and Glucose Sensing. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 11940–11944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, C.; Ding, W.; Zhao, W.W.; Liu, H.B.; Wang, J.; Yao, Y.W.; Yao, C. High peroxidase-like activity realized by facile synthesis of FeS2 nanoparticles for sensitive colorimetric detection of H2O2 and glutathione. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 151, 111983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cao, X.; Wang, N.; Jia, S.; Shao, Y.H. Detection of Glucose Based on Bimetallic PtCu Nanochains Modified Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 5040–5046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lu, J.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; Guo, S.; Shen, L.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, Y. Oxygen-vacancy-enhanced peroxidase-like activity of reduced Co3O4 nanocomposites for the colorimetric detection of H2O2 and glucose. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 3152–3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, C.; Xu, C. Nanoporous PdCu alloy as an excellent electrochemical sensor for H2O2 and glucose detection. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 491, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhao, D.; Xu, C. A nanoporous palladium-nickel alloy with high sensing performance towards hydrogen peroxide and glucose. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 447, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ngamaroonchote, A.; Sanguansap, Y.; Wutikhun, T.; Karn-Orachai, K. Highly branched gold-copper nanostructures for non-enzymatic specific detection of glucose and hydrogen peroxide. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, W.C.; Kim, K.B.; Gurudatt, N.G.; Hussain, K.K.; Choi, C.S.; Park, D.S.; Shim, Y.B. Comparison of enzymatic and non-enzymatic glucose sensors based on hierarchical Au-Ni alloy with conductive polymer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 130, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lin, L.; Weng, S.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Ying, S.; Chen, F.; You, D. Bimetallic PtAu alloy nanomaterials for nonenzymatic selective glucose sensing at low potential. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 865, 114147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Transmission electron microscopy images of (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b) Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, and (e) Au1Cu2 alloy nanoparticles. (f) X-ray diffraction patterns of the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles.
Figure 1. Transmission electron microscopy images of (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b) Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, and (e) Au1Cu2 alloy nanoparticles. (f) X-ray diffraction patterns of the Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles.
Catalysts 11 00343 g001
Figure 2. The pH-dependent response curve for H2O2 detection using the as-prepared Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles incubated at room temperature. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three measurements.
Figure 2. The pH-dependent response curve for H2O2 detection using the as-prepared Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles incubated at room temperature. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three measurements.
Catalysts 11 00343 g002
Figure 3. Temperature-dependent response curve for H2O2 detection using the as-prepared Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles at pH = 4. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three measurements.
Figure 3. Temperature-dependent response curve for H2O2 detection using the as-prepared Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles at pH = 4. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three measurements.
Catalysts 11 00343 g003
Figure 4. Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in different reaction systems.
Figure 4. Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in different reaction systems.
Catalysts 11 00343 g004
Figure 5. (ag) Dose-response curves for H2O2 detection using (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b) Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, (e) Au1Cu2, (f) Cu, and (g) Au as peroxidase mimetics. Inset of (a)–(e): Linear range of absorbance intensity versus H2O2 concentration. (h) Limit of detection (LOD) for H2O2 of Au1Cu0.1, Au1Cu0.2, Au1Cu0.5, Au1Cu1, Au1Cu2 nanoparticles, Cu nanoparticles, and Au nanoparticles.
Figure 5. (ag) Dose-response curves for H2O2 detection using (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b) Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, (e) Au1Cu2, (f) Cu, and (g) Au as peroxidase mimetics. Inset of (a)–(e): Linear range of absorbance intensity versus H2O2 concentration. (h) Limit of detection (LOD) for H2O2 of Au1Cu0.1, Au1Cu0.2, Au1Cu0.5, Au1Cu1, Au1Cu2 nanoparticles, Cu nanoparticles, and Au nanoparticles.
Catalysts 11 00343 g005
Figure 6. Selectivity analysis of H2O2 detection using Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles as peroxidase mimetics. The concentration of H2O2 and other substances was 10 mM.
Figure 6. Selectivity analysis of H2O2 detection using Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles as peroxidase mimetics. The concentration of H2O2 and other substances was 10 mM.
Catalysts 11 00343 g006
Figure 7. Ultraviolet-visible absorption intensity of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in the presence of glucose with and without glucose oxidase (GOx). The concentration of glucose was 10 mM.
Figure 7. Ultraviolet-visible absorption intensity of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in the presence of glucose with and without glucose oxidase (GOx). The concentration of glucose was 10 mM.
Catalysts 11 00343 g007
Figure 8. (ae) Dose-response curves for glucose detection using (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b) Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, and (e) Au1Cu2 as peroxidase mimetics. Inset of ae: Linear range of absorbance intensity versus H2O2 concentration. (f) Limit of detection (LOD) for glucose of Au1Cu0.1, Au1Cu0.2, Au1Cu0.5, Au1Cu1, and Au1Cu2 nanoparticles.
Figure 8. (ae) Dose-response curves for glucose detection using (a) Au1Cu0.1, (b) Au1Cu0.2, (c) Au1Cu0.5, (d) Au1Cu1, and (e) Au1Cu2 as peroxidase mimetics. Inset of ae: Linear range of absorbance intensity versus H2O2 concentration. (f) Limit of detection (LOD) for glucose of Au1Cu0.1, Au1Cu0.2, Au1Cu0.5, Au1Cu1, and Au1Cu2 nanoparticles.
Catalysts 11 00343 g008
Figure 9. Selectivity analysis of glucose detection using Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles as peroxidase mimetics. The concentration of glucose and other substances was 10 mM.
Figure 9. Selectivity analysis of glucose detection using Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles as peroxidase mimetics. The concentration of glucose and other substances was 10 mM.
Catalysts 11 00343 g009
Table 1. Analytical parameters of H2O2 detection in recent papers.
Table 1. Analytical parameters of H2O2 detection in recent papers.
MaterialDetection Range (μM)LOD (μM)References
Por–CeO210–1001.8[16]
Au–Hg5–1000.35[40]
Au@TiO25–4004.0[47]
Au/Co3O4–CeOx10–10005.29[48]
FePt–Au20–70012.33[49]
AuNPs@AuNCs50–250030[50]
FeS280–2000.91[51]
Au@Ag0–1003.2[52]
Au–Cu1–10000.141This work
Table 2. Analytical parameters of glucose detection in recent papers.
Table 2. Analytical parameters of glucose detection in recent papers.
MaterialDetection Range (μM)LOD (μM)References
R–Co3O40.001–0.020.32[53]
Pd–Cu1–301.9[54]
Pd–Ni1–251.9[55]
branched Au–Cu0.25–1016.62[56]
Au–Ni0.001–300.29[57]
Pt–Au0.01–103[58]
Au1Cu20.002–0.010.26This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, C.; Im, S.H.; Yu, T. Synthesis of Au–Cu Alloy Nanoparticles as Peroxidase Mimetics for H2O2 and Glucose Colorimetric Detection. Catalysts 2021, 11, 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11030343

AMA Style

Liu C, Im SH, Yu T. Synthesis of Au–Cu Alloy Nanoparticles as Peroxidase Mimetics for H2O2 and Glucose Colorimetric Detection. Catalysts. 2021; 11(3):343. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11030343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Cun, Sang Hyuk Im, and Taekyung Yu. 2021. "Synthesis of Au–Cu Alloy Nanoparticles as Peroxidase Mimetics for H2O2 and Glucose Colorimetric Detection" Catalysts 11, no. 3: 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11030343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop