Next Article in Journal
Ambient Air Purification by Nanotechnologies: From Theory to Application
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Performance of a Sustainable Rice Husk Biochar for the Activation of Persulfate and the Degradation of Antibiotics
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancement of Biological Pretreatment on Rice Straw by an Ionic Liquid or Surfactant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conversion of Scenedesmus rubescens Lipid into Biodiesel by Biochar of Different Origin
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Recent Development in Sludge Biochar-Based Catalysts for Advanced Oxidation Processes of Wastewater

Catalysts 2021, 11(11), 1275; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11111275
by Xingxing Chen 1,2,3,†, Liya Fu 1,2,†, Yin Yu 1,2, Changyong Wu 1,2,*, Min Li 1,2, Xiaoguang Jin 1,2,4, Jin Yang 1,2,5, Panxin Wang 1,2 and Ying Chen 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Catalysts 2021, 11(11), 1275; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11111275
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 18 October 2021 / Accepted: 19 October 2021 / Published: 22 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Application of Biochar in Catalytic Processes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper reviews an adequate number of papers dealing with the production and application of catalysts from sewage sludge in advanced oxidation processes.

This topic is of interest to the readers of this journal. The manuscript is well arranged and presents some recent findings. I recommend publication after minor revisions,

 

Please, consider the following comments:

  • The manuscript requires a revision due to the presence of several typos and misuse of articles
  • The text is most effective where data are arranged in tables. Please, consider introducing a table also for summarizing the data proposed in the paragraph 4
  • The paragraph called methods (where the research principle is reported ) seems to me superfluous and should be removed.
  • Please, avoid multiple citations (e.  Zhang et al., 2019; Kwon et al., 2012; Zaker et al., 2019; Swann et al., 2017) by specifying why each paper was mentioned.
  • Are the figures in the text original or are they extracted from other papers? In this case their reference should be included in the caption.
  • A paragraph on costs and viability is missing
  • Another missing aspect, which is of great interest and therefore worth investigating, is the possible formation or release of potentially dangerous compounds

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor,

Regarding this paper, I have minor observations, in order to improve the overall quality of this good piece of work.

After that, I do recommend the publication of the manuscript.

Sincerely yours.

 

Numbering lines would facilitate the reading.

It is not clear the differences between “correspondence” (corresponding?) authors number 1, 2, and 3.

 

Abstract: replace “metals/nonmetals” to pollutants dopants. (there are metalloids as well).

Introduction:

“Since sludge contains many toxic substances”…   many toxic is quite vague. Which ones?

 

Methods:

“Among all the cited papers, the earliest publication year of articles on the sludge-biochar based catalyst was 2011.”  This is a result, not a method.

 

3.3 Dopants

“For sulfate-based AOPs, the doping of nitrogen can substantially alter catalytic oxidation pathway from a radical process to a nonradical process”. Why this sentence has been in underline form?

 

4.4. and in whole text:

Sometimes authors cite dosages in mg/L and in other places in mmol/L. It would be usefull if the paper standardize these units.

Table 1, 2, 3, and 4: The removal capacities should be reported in the same basis.

 

  1. Concluding remarks would be more clear as a heading of this session.

 

Congratulations.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Back to TopTop