Next Article in Journal
Thiosemicarbazone Complexes of Transition Metals as Catalysts for Cross-Coupling Reactions
Next Article in Special Issue
In Situ Generated Nanosized Sulfide Ni-W Catalysts Based on Zeolite for the Hydrocracking of the Pyrolysis Fuel Oil into the BTX Fraction
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of β-Ga2O3 Nanostructures for Decomposition of Formaldehyde under Deep Ultraviolet Irradiation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coupling Pre-Reforming and Partial Oxidation for LPG Conversion to Syngas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Palladium Catalysts Based on Porous Aromatic Frameworks, Modified with Ethanolamino-Groups, for Hydrogenation of Alkynes, Alkenes and Dienes

1
Department of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia
2
Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2020, 10(10), 1106; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101106
Submission received: 18 September 2020 / Revised: 18 September 2020 / Accepted: 22 September 2020 / Published: 24 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heterogeneous Catalysts for Petrochemical Synthesis and Oil Refining)

Abstract

:
The current work describes an attempt to synthesize hybrid materials combining porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs) and dendrimers and use them to obtain novel highly active and selective palladium catalysts. PAFs are carbon porous materials with rigid aromatic structure and high stability, and the dendrimers are macromolecules which can effectively stabilize metal nanoparticles and tune their activity in catalytic reactions. Two porous aromatic frameworks, PAF-20 and PAF-30, are modified step-by-step with diethanolamine and hydroxyl groups at the ends of which are replaced by new diethanolamine molecules. Then, palladium nanoparticles are applied to the synthesized materials. Properties of the obtained materials and catalysts are investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, solid state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, low temperature N2 adsorption and elemental analysis. The resulting catalysts are successfully applied as an efficient and recyclable catalyst for selective hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes at very high (up to 90,000) substrate/Pd ratios.

1. Introduction

Palladium is one of the most widespread metals used in the selective hydrogenation of unsaturated compounds [1,2,3]. It is commonly used in a form of nanoparticles, for this process, whose high surface area provides a large number of available active sites per unit area. This leads to greater reactivity of the nanoparticles than with bulk palladium [4]. Changes in the size of particles, their morphology and distribution significantly affect their catalytic properties. However, unstabilized metal nanoparticles (NPs) are prone to aggregation, which leads to the formation of thermodynamically stable large particles with lower catalytic activity [5]. The main method to avoid aggregation of NPs is the use of encapsulating ligands and polymers or porous materials [6,7,8,9,10,11].
One of the most effective supports for metal nanoparticles are dendrimers—regular, three-dimensional, spherically symmetric macromolecules. Since dendrimers have interior voids of nanometer dimensions, they can hold nanoparticles of suitable sizes, which can fit into those voids [12]. Encapsulation of metals in a structure of dendrimers allows for control of the size of the nanoparticles and provides for their uniform distribution [13]. Strong coordination of the chelating nitrogen-containing groups with metal prevents NPs from leaching and agglomerating during reaction, thus providing outstanding stability. However, the use of dendrimer-stabilized nanoparticles is limited due to difficulties, connected to their separation from the reaction mixtures and time-consuming synthesis, which includes multistage purification [14].
These disadvantages may be overcome using one of two possible approaches. The first includes the covalent linking of dendrimer macromolecules using different bi- and tri-functional agents [15,16]. The second implies the attachment of dendrimers or dendrons to the surface of organic or inorganic insoluble supports. The main examples of such carriers are SiO2 (both amorphous and mesoporous) [9,17] multiwall carbon nanotubes, or cross-linked polymer resins, such as polystyrenes [18], polythiophenes [19], or polyvinylpyridines [20]. The development of such hybrid materials is promising for the field of hydrogenation, due to their high activity and stability, immense selectivity, and easy recyclability.
Due to high values of specific surface area, developed porosity, and a variety of methods for the synthesis and modification of the structure, mesoporous materials and polymers have found wide application in the stabilization of nanoparticles [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. One of these materials are porous aromatic frameworks (PAF)—polymers with a rigid structure consisting of aromatic rings connected to each other [28]. Their aromatic nature provides thermal stability and the possibility for facile introduction of functional groups, as well as additional stabilization of palladium nanoparticles. Modification of the polymer structure with various functional groups allows improvement of characteristics of the resulting catalyst significantly to increase its stability, to control activity, and selectivity [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. All these properties make porous aromatic frameworks promising supports for metal nanoparticles. The incorporation of coordination electron-donating groups in the material is regarded as an especially efficient method to stabilize active catalytic species [27,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46].
Materials with nitrogen and oxygen functionalities, such as amine and hydroxyl groups, have a high affinity for metal ions [47]. Porous organic polymers with a high nitrogen and oxygen content have a high potential for the uptake of metal ions or the immobilization of metal nanoparticles [18,48,49,50,51,52]. Such features, and their resulting applications in heterogeneous catalysis, are the main driving force behind the design and synthesis of porous organic frameworks with electron-donating groups. Here, we study palladium catalysts based on mesoporous aromatic frameworks modified with diethanolamine in a hydrogenation of different unsaturated compounds.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Supports

Porous aromatic frameworks (PAF), PAF-20 and PAF-30, were synthesized according to the method described by Yuan Y. et al. [53] from tetrakis-(p-bromophenyl)methane and 1,4-phenylenediboronic acid or 4,4′-biphenyldiboronic acid. Consequently, PAF-20 and PAF-30 differed in the number of benzene rings between sp3 carbon atoms in the nodes of the frameworks: PAF-20 had three benzene rings, and PAF-30 had four rings. Thus, PAF-20 typically had a smaller pore size, but a larger surface area compared to PAF-30 [24]. Subsequent modification of PAF structure with chloromethyl groups and diethanolamino groups was performed using methods by Gangadharan. D. et al. [54] and Lu.W. et al. [55] (Scheme 1). To determine the structural features of the structure of the obtained materials, they were studied using solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, low-temperature N2 adsorption and elemental analysis.
Figure 1 shows the solid-state cross polarization-magic angle spinning (CP-MAS) 13C NMR spectra for PAF-based materials. All spectra contained typical for PAF signals in the region of 125–145 ppm for sp2-hybridized carbon atoms of aromatic rings and, at 63 ppm, corresponded to sp3-hybridized carbon atoms in the center of tetraphenylmethane units. After modification with chloromethyl groups, a new signal belonging to the -CH2Cl group appeared at 44 ppm, which was consistent with published data [56,57]. Replacing the chlorine atom in -CH2Cl with an ethanolamine group reduced the intensity of this peak due to screening of the carbon atom by branched ethanolamine groups and shifted its position from 44 ppm to 49–50 ppm. A similar dependence of the signal displacement upon the addition of various amines was observed during the earlier works [54,56]. Also, diethanolamino-modified materials PAF-20-G0, PAF-20-G1, PAF-30-G0 and PAF-30-G1 contained new signals at 56 and 58 ppm, which were assigned to carbon atoms of the ethanolamine groups.
Porous properties of PAFs were defined using low-temperature N2 adsorption. Starting materials PAF-20 and PAF-30 had 578 m2/g and 506 m2/g Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, respectively (Table 1). The surface area of polymers decreased upon modification: after chloromethylation it was 472 and 436 m2/g for PAF-20-CH2Cl and PAF-30-CH2Cl, and after treatment with diethanolamine it was 64 and 31 m2/g, respectively. Transition from G0 to G1 generation resulted in an even greater reduction of surface area, which was explained by the blocking of pores by bulky functional groups.
The adsorption isotherms (Figure 2) of the samples PAF-20 and PAF-30, as well as their chloromethylated derivatives, exhibited a sharp absorption of N2 at a low relative pressure (p/p0 <0.05), which indicated the developed microporous structure of these materials. The presence of a hysteresis loop, and the fact that the nitrogen sorption curve gradually rose without the appearance of a plateau, may indicate the presence of mesopores in the polymer structure [58]. Conversely, this species may be due to diffusion restrictions or polymer swelling [59]. Chloromethylation did not change the character of nitrogen adsorption, which may indicate a uniform distribution of -CH2Cl groups over the volume of the carrier and a slight change in the pore size.
Treatment of chloromethylated polymers with diethanolamine led to significant change in the character of nitrogen adsorption: there was no longer a sharp rise in the adsorption curve and, in the case of PAF-20-G0, there was practically no desorption of nitrogen from the pores. This shape of the curves can be associated with strong blocking of the pores by the diethanolamino-groups, which was more pronounced for PAF-20-G0 due to its smaller pore size. Further modification of materials up to generation G1 led to a further reduction in pore size: adsorption curves for PAF-20-G1 and PAF-30-G1 were typical for non-porous materials [58]. Thus, we can conclude for PAF-20-G0 and PAF-30-G0 materials, only a small fraction of the pores were available and. in the case of PAF-20-G1 and PAF-30-G1, the only pores available were in the immediate vicinity of the outer surface of the catalyst grain. Also, the decrease in surface area and porosity after grafting of the surface of porous materials is a well-known fact. Thus, after modification of PAFs with different polyamines [58], the surface area and free volume of pores decreased dramatically from 4023 m2/g for PPN-6 material to 555 m2/g for tris-(2-aminoethyl)amine-modified material. However, we should note that in the case of the modification of porous aromatic frameworks with diethanolamine led to too high a decrease in porosity.
Elemental analysis also suggests successful functionalization of aromatic rings with different functional groups (Table 2). The averaged content of chlorine in the materials PAF-20-CH2Cl and PAF-30-CH2Cl was 3%—to be exact, about 7% of the benzene rings were modified. After treatment of chloromethylated polymers with diethanolamine, it decreased to 0.9%–1.2%, whereas nitrogen content in the resulting samples was 1.7%–1.8%. The presence of chlorine in these samples may indicate an incomplete modification: most likely, chloromethyl groups deep into the catalyst grain did not react with diethanolamine. Regarding the materials of the G1 series, the content of chlorine was even higher, and the nitrogen content increased only slightly. It indicates the occurrence of the substitution reaction of the hydroxyl groups for chlorine atoms during the treatment of materials of the G0 series with thionyl chloride, on the one hand. The completeness of this reaction was even lower than in the synthesis of materials of the G0 series, on the other hand.

2.2. Characterization of Palladium Catalysts

Catalysts based on porous aromatic frameworks modified with the ethanolamine groups Pd-PAF-20-G0, Pd-PAF-20-G1, Pd-PAF-30-G0 and Pd-PAF-30-G1 were obtained by immobilizing palladium nanoparticles into pores of supports. The palladium content was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) (Table 3).
Pd-PAF-20-G0 and Pd-PAF-30-G0 catalysts contained well-dispersed small particles with a relatively narrow size distribution (2–2.5 nm) based on the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) microphotographs (Figure 3). This confirms the successful introduction of nanoparticles into the modified pores of materials.
To contrast, the G1 series catalysts contained only a small number of palladium particles, which were larger (average size 7–8 nm) and the size distribution curves were wider (Figure 4). It is seen in the micrographs that there are few nanoparticles and agglomerates are observed on the surface. This fact may be due to the blocking of the pores by the diethanolamine groups, which interfere with the diffusion of palladium ions inside the porous structure.
According to the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data (Table 4), the nitrogen content was higher in the materials of the G1 series, which proves the process of modification of ethanolamine groups during the synthesis of materials PAF-20-G1 and PAF-30-G0. Concurrently, the chlorine content in the materials with modification of the G1 type remained higher than in the G0 series. That demonstrates the incomplete reaction of the substitution of chlorine for diethanolamine at the last stage of synthesis. The palladium content was higher in materials of the G0 series, which may be due to better immobilization of the palladium particles in the pores of the support.
All XPS spectra demonstrated two sets of peaks related to reduced (Pd0) and oxidized (PdOx) palladium forms (Figure 5). The presence of oxides in the spectra of samples could be due to incomplete reduction of the initial palladium or oxidation of the nanoparticles with atmospheric oxygen. The binding energies of Pd0 3d5/2 and Pd0 3d3/2 for Pd-PAF-20-G0 and Pd-PAF-30-G0 catalysts were higher than that for free Pd0 (335.6 and 341.1 eV, respectively). The changing of energy values indicates the presence of a coordination effect between nitrogen or oxygen atoms in the supports (Table 5). The same binding energies for the materials Pd-PAF-20-G1 and Pd-PAF-30-G1 were practically no different from the binding energies for free palladium. These results confirm the assumption that there is no coordination between palladium nanoparticles and the diethanolamine groups. Nanoparticles in these catalysts are either in unmodified pores or on the surface of the support.

2.3. Catalytic Activity

The synthesized catalysts were examined in the hydrogenation of various C6 and C8 unsaturated compounds (Table 6). The G0 series catalysts were more active than the G1 series catalysts, and catalysts based on the materials of the PAF-30 type were more active than those of the PAF-20 type. Thus, the Pd-PAF-30-G0 catalyst showed the highest activity in the hydrogenation of linear alkynes and alkenes: its specific activity (Table 7) was more than 300,000 mol Sub × mol Me−1 × h−1 in the case of hexyne-1, hexene-1, octyne-1, and octene-1 (Table 7). Regarding 2,5-dimethyl-2,4-hexadiene, it was about 295,000 mol Sub × mol Me−1 × h−1 and, for more bulky substrates—phenylacetylene and styrene—it was much lower (116,000 and 79,000 mol Sub × mol Me−1 × h−1, respectively), which may be due to conjugation between the benzene ring and double and triple bonds in these substrates.
Pd-PAF-20-G0 possessed lesser hydrogenation activity: high conversion was achieved only for hexyne-1, whereas yields of hydrogenation products for other substrates were much lower. This could be due to the smaller pore size in PAF-20 and, as a consequence, lower diffusion of substrates to palladium nanoparticles [33]. Catalysts Pd-PAF-20-G1 and Pd-PAF-30-G1 showed less activity. This may be due to the fact that further modification of the material with diethanolamine groups leads to a significant decrease in pore size, restricting the penetration of substrates, and the leaching of metal particles from the surface.
The stability of Pd-PAF-20-G0 and Pd-PAF-30-G0 catalysts was tested in recycle experiments regarding the hydrogenation of hexene-1. Both catalysts remained active for five reuse cycles. A slight reduction in conversions was observed only in the first two repetitions (Table 8). This fact is associated with the leaching of particles from the surface of the catalyst, as is seen in TEM micrographs, as well as in losses during catalytic experiments. A slight increase in the average particle size from 2.5 to 2.6 nm for Pd-PAF-30-G0, and from 2 to 2.9 nm for Pd-PAF-20-G0, can be noted; however, the distribution of the nanoparticles in the materials remained uniform (Figure 6). The washing out of nanoparticles from the surface also is confirmed by XPS data, according to which, after five reuse cycles, the amount of surface palladium decreased from 2.8 at.% to 2.1 at.% for Pd-PAF-20-G0, and from 1.3 at.% to 1.0 at.% for Pd PAF 30 G0 (Table 9).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Used Reagents

The following reagents were used in the work: benzene (IREA 2000, Moscow, Russia, Purum p.a.); styrene (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, ≥99%); phenylacetylene (Aldrich, Shanghai, China, 98%); 2,5-dimethyl-2,4-hexadiene (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 98%); methanol (Acros Organics, Morris Plains, NJ, USA ); ethanol (IREA 2000, Moscow, Russia, Purum p.a.); chloroform (Ecos-1, Moscow, Russia, Purum), octene-1 (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 98%); octyne-1 (abcr, Karlsruhe, Germany, 98%); 2,5-dimethylhexadiene-2,4 (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 96%), hexene-1 (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 98%), hexyne-1 (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 99%), 1,3–cyclohexadiene (Acros Organics, Morris Plains, NJ, USA), paraformaldehyde (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 95%), hydrochloric acid (Sigma-tech, Moscow region, Russia, high-purity grade), phosphorus oxide(V) (Khimmed, Moscow, high-purity grade), acetic acid (Ruskhim, Moscow, Russia, high-purity grade), 1,4-dioxane (Ruskhim, Moscow, Russia, high-purity grade), diethanolamine (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 98%), potassium iodide (Reakhim, Staraya Kupavna, Moscow region, Russia, high-purity grade), acetone (Ekros, Saint-Peterburg, Russia, high-purity grade) thionyl chloride (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 97%), nitric acid (Component–Reaktiv, Moscow, Russia, high-purity grade), potassium carbonate (Component-reactive, Moscow, Russia, pure), sodium borohydride (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 98%).
PAFs ware prepared according to published literature procedures [53]. The modification techniques for PAF-20 and PAF-30 are similar. Below are the methods for modifying the PAF-20 material.

3.2. Synthesis of PAF-20-CH2Cl

Chloromethylation was carried out according to the method modified from a previous work [55]. Paraformaldehyde (1 g) and hydrochloric acid (20 mL) were placed in a round-bottomed flask equipped with a stirrer and a reflux condenser. After dissolving of paraformaldehyde, phosphorus pentoxide (4 g) and glacial acetic acid (6 mL) were carefully added to the mixture. Subsequently, PAF-20 (200 mg) was placed in the flask and stirred at 90 °C for 3 days. The resulting solid was collected using filtration, washed 3 times with water (100 mL) and ethanol (100 mL), and dried in vacuo to produce PAF-20-CH2Cl as a yellow powder.

3.3. Synthesis of PAF-20-G0

Modification of PAF-20-CH2Cl was performed according to the procedure adapted from a previous work [54]. PAF-20-CH2Cl (100 mg), dioxane (6 mL), diethanolamine (0.4 mL) and catalytic amounts of potassium iodide (10 mg) were mixed in a round-bottomed flask and stirred at 70 °C for 3 days. The solid was collected using filtration, washed with acetone (3 × 50 mL), and dried in vacuo. The obtained material, PAF-20-CH2N(CH2CH2OH)2, was called PAF-20-G0 as an analogy with the numbering of the dendrimer generations.

3.4. Synthesis of PAF-20-G1

PAF-20-G0 (100 mg) was mixed with 1,4-dioxane (6 mL) in a round-bottomed flask, and then thionyl chloride (1.0 mL) was added dropwise to the suspension. The resulting mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 24 h, then the solid was collected using filtration and washed with ethanol (3 × 50 mL), a 2M solution of potassium carbonate (3 × 50 mL), water (3 × 50 mL) and ethanol (3 × 50 mL), and dried in vacuo. Then, the resulting material PAF-20-CH2N(CH2CH2Cl)2, called PAF-20-G0.5, was placed in a round-bottomed flask with dioxane (6 mL), diethanolamine (0.8 mL) and potassium iodide (10 mg). The suspension was stirred at 70 °C for 3 days. The resulting material was filtered off, washed with acetone (3 × 50 mL) and dried in vacuo.

3.5. Synthesis of Catalyst Pd-PAF-G0 and Pd-PAF-G1

Immobilization of palladium particles into the pores of PAFs was performed by the method described by Karakhanov, E.A. et al. [16]. The synthesis procedure described below was used to prepare the catalysts Pd-PAF-20-G0, Pd-PAF-20-G1, Pd-PAF-30-G0 and Pd-PAF-30-G1. The procedure for the synthesis of catalyst Pd-PAF-20-G0 is an example.
Palladium acetate (4.26 mg) was dissolved in chloroform (6 mL) in a round-bottomed flask, equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser. Then, PAF-20-G0 (100 mg) was added to the resulting solution. The suspension was stirred at 60 °C for 24 h, and then a solution of sodium borohydride (7 mg) in a water-ethanol mixture (0.5 mL:0.5 mL) was added. The reaction mixture darkened and gas evolution was observed. Subsequently, the flask was closed with a stopper and left for 12 h with stirring. After the reaction, the resulting substance was collected by centrifugation, washed with water (3 × 50 mL) and ethanol (3 × 50 mL) to remove sodium tetraborate, the precipitate was isolated by centrifugation and dried in air.

3.6. Catalytic Experiments

The calculated amounts of substrates and catalyst (1 mg) were placed in a glass tube equipped with a magnetic stirrer. The tube was placed in a steel autoclave, then it was sealed and pressurized with hydrogen at a pressure of 10 atm. Reactions were carried out at 80 °C for 30 min. After completion of the reaction, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature and depressurized. Reaction products were analyzed by gas chromatography. Specific activity of the catalysts was calculated using following equation:
A   =   Conv     ( sub / Me ) D     t
where A is the specific activity, Conv is the conversion of the substrate, Sub/Me is the substrate to metal proportion, D is the metal dispersion, and t is the reaction time.

3.7. Characterization

3.7.1. Low Temperature Nitrogen Adsorption

Nitrogen desorption/desorption isotherms were recorded at 77 K with a Micromeritics Gemini VII 2390 instrument (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, United States). All samples were degassed at 110 °C for 6 h before measurement. The surface area (SBET) was calculated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method based on adsorption data in the relative pressure range P/P0 = 0.05–0.2. The total pore volume (Vtot) was determined by the amount of nitrogen adsorbed at a relative pressure of P/P0 = 0.995.

3.7.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

TEM analysis was carried out on a JEOL JEM-2100/Cs/GIF microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with a 0.19 nm lattice fringe resolution and an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The processing of the micrographs and the calculation of the average particle size were conducted using the ImageJ software program.

3.7.3. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

XPS studies were performed on a VersaProbeII, ULVAC-PHI (ULVAC-PHI, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan) instrument using excitation with Al Kα X-ray radiation at 1486.6 eV. The calibration of photoelectron peaks was based on the Au 4f line with a binding energy of 84 eV and on the Cu2p3/2 line (932.6 eV). The transmission energy of the energy analyzer was 117.4 eV (survey scans) and 23.5 eV (individual lines).

3.7.4. Gas-Liquid Chromatography

Analysis of the reaction mixture was carried out on a Agilent 6890 G1530A chromatograph (Hewlett Packard, Santa-Clara, CA, United States) equipped with a flame-ionization detector and a HP-1 column (50 m × 0.32 mm × 1.05 µm, 100% dimethylpolysiloxane grafted phase). Helium was a carrier gas; the analysis was carried out in constant pressure mode (1.53 bar). Chromatograms were recorded and analyzed on a computer using the HP ChemStation Rev.A.06.01 (403) software.

3.7.5. Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy

The Pd content in the catalysts was determined via atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) on an iCE 3000 Series AA spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Santa-Clara, CA, United States) with flame atomization. The data were processed using the SOLAAR software.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, we developed active and selective catalysts based on hybrid materials. It was shown that introduction of ethanolamine groups allowed for achievement of an efficient sorption of palladium ions and uniform distribution of palladium nanoparticles in size and in the pores of the carrier. Catalysts based on PAF-20-G0 and PAF-30-G0 materials demonstrated a high catalytic activity and stability. Nanoparticles in these catalysts were located both on the surface of the support and in the pore space.
Modification of the G1 type led to blockage of the pores of the aromatic framework, which prevented the diffusion of palladium ions into the pores of the carrier. The G1 series catalysts contained larger particles (average size 7–8 nm) and were characterized by a broader size distribution, and most of the nanoparticles were located on the material surface. The activity of the Pd-PAF-20-G1 and Pd-PAF-30-G1 catalysts turned out to be lower than that of the G0 series catalysts, which was due to the blockage of pores.
Thus, to enhance the activity of catalysts, it is necessary to solve the problem of a significant decrease in the porosity of hybrid materials, as well as to improve approaches to the modification of supports. Due to this, it will be possible to significantly expand the field of application of these materials, in particular, to use them to create catalysts for other catalytic processes (processing of petroleum fractions, bio-raw materials, fine organic synthesis, etc.)

Author Contributions

E.K., performed conceptualization; M.T., developed methodology; D.M., M.K., performed investigation; Y.K., performed formal analysis; A.M., performed supervision; L.K., performed writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by RSF, grant number 20-19-00380.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, L.; Zhou, C.; Zhao, H.; Wang, R. Spatial control of palladium nanoparticles in flexible click-based porous organic polymers for hydrogenation of olefins and nitrobenzene. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 709–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, L.; Zhao, H.; Wang, R. Tailorable synthesis of porous organic polymers decorating ultrafine palladium nanoparticles for hydrogenation of olefins. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Garg, G.; Foltran, S.; Favier, I.; Pla, D.; Medina-González, Y.; Gómez, M. Palladium nanoparticles stabilized by novel choline-based ionic liquids in glycerol applied in hydrogenation reactions. Catal. Today 2020, 346, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chung, J.; Kim, C.; Jeong, H.; Yu, T.; Binh, D.H.; Jang, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, B.M.; Lim, B. Selective semihydrogenation of alkynes on shape-controlled palladium nanocrystals. Chem. Asian J. 2013, 8, 919–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Riduan, S.N. Functional porous organic polymers for heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2083–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, S. Novel functionalized microporous organic networks based on triphenylphosphine. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10024–10029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hausoul, P.J.C.; Eggenhuisen, T.M.; Nand, D.; Baldus, M.; Weckhuysen, B.M.; Klein Gebbink, R.J.M.; Bruijnincx, P.C.A. Development of a 4,4′-biphenyl/phosphine-based COF for the heterogeneous Pd-catalysed telomerisation of 1,3-butadiene. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 2571–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Karakhanov, E.A.; Maksimov, A.L.; Zolotukhina, A.V.; Kardasheva, Y.S. Hydrogenation catalysts based on metal nanoparticles stabilized by organic ligands. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2013, 62, 1465–1492. [Google Scholar]
  9. Karakhanov, E.; Maximov, A.; Kardasheva, Y.; Semernina, V.; Zolotukhina, A.; Ivanov, A.; Abbott, G.; Rosenberg, E.; Vinokurov, V. Pd nanoparticles in dendrimers immobilized on silica-polyamine composites as catalysts for selective hydrogenation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 8807–8816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Karakhanov, E.A.; Maximov, A.L.; Zolotukhina, A.V. Selective semi-hydrogenation of phenyl acetylene by Pd nanocatalysts encapsulated into dendrimer networks. Mol. Catal. 2019, 469, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, H.; He, Y.; Pfefferle, L.D.; Pu, W.; Wu, Y.; Qi, S. Phenol Catalytic Hydrogenation over Palladium Nanoparticles Supported on Metal-Organic Frameworks in the Aqueous Phase. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 2558–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jansen, J.F.G.A.; De Brabander-Van Den Berg, E.M.M.; Meijer, E.W. Encapsulation of guest molecules into a dendritic box. Science 1994, 266, 1226–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Niu, Y.; Crooks, R.M. Dendrimer-encapsulated metal nanoparticles and their applications to catalysis. C. R. Chim. 2003, 6, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yates, C.R.; Hayes, W. Synthesis and applications of hyperbranched polymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40, 1257–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Karakhanov, E.A.; Maximov, A.L.; Skorkin, V.A.; Zolotukhina, A.V.; Smerdov, A.S.; Tereshchenko, A.Y. Nanocatalysts based on dendrimers. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 81, 2013–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Karakhanov, E.A.; Maximov, A.L.; Zakharyan, E.M.; Zolotukhina, A.V.; Ivanov, A.O. Palladium nanoparticles on dendrimer-containing supports as catalysts for hydrogenation of unsaturated hydrocarbons. Mol. Catal. 2017, 440, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karakanov, E.A.; Zolotukhina, A.V.; Ivanov, A.O.; Maximov, A.L. Dendrimer-Encapsulated Pd Nanoparticles, Immobilized in Silica Pores, as Catalysts for Selective Hydrogenation of Unsaturated Compounds. Chem. Open 2019, 8, 358–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krishnan, G.R.; Sreekumar, K. Synthesis and Characterization of Polystyrene Supported Catalytically Active Poly(amidoamine) Dendrimer-Palladium Nanoparticle Conjugates. Soft Mater. 2010, 8, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alvarez, J.; Sun, L.; Crooks, R.M. Electroactive composite dendrimer films containing thiophene-terminated poly(amidoamine) dendrimers cross-linked by poly(3-methylthiophene). Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 3995–4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Murugan, E.; Rangasamy, R. Synthesis, characterization, and heterogeneous catalysis of polymer-supported poly(propyleneimine) dendrimer stabilized gold nanoparticle catalyst. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 2525–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, L.; Zhao, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, R. Facile fabrication of ultrafine palladium nanoparticles with size- and location-control in click-based porous organic polymers. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5352–5364. [Google Scholar]
  22. Karakhanov, E.; Kardasheva, Y.; Kulikov, L.; Maximov, A.; Zolotukhina, A.; Vinnikova, M.; Ivanov, A. Sulfide catalysts supported on porous aromatic frameworks for naphthalene hydroprocessing. Catalysts 2016, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yuan, Y.; Zhu, G. Porous Aromatic Frameworks as a Platform for Multifunctional Applications. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Maximov, A.; Zolotukhina, A.; Kulikov, L.; Kardasheva, Y.; Karakhanov, E. Ruthenium catalysts based on mesoporous aromatic frameworks for the hydrogenation of arenes. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2016, 117, 729–743. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, F.; Mielby, J.; Richter, F.H.; Wang, G.; Prieto, G.; Kasama, T.; Weidenthaler, C.; Bongard, H.J.; Kegnæs, S.; Fürstner, A.; et al. A polyphenylene support for pd catalysts with exceptional catalytic activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 8645–8648. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kulikov, L.A.; Terenina, M.V.; Kryazheva, I.Y.; Karakhanov, E.A. Unsaturated-compound hydrogenation nanocatalysts based on palladium and platinum particles immobilized in pores of mesoporous aromatic frameworks. Pet. Chem. 2017, 57, 222–229. [Google Scholar]
  27. Su, J.; Chen, J.S. Synthetic porous materials applied in hydrogenation reactions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 237, 246–259. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ben, T.; Ren, H.; Shengqian, M.; Cao, D.; Lan, J.; Jing, X.; Wang, W.; Xu, J.; Deng, F.; Simmons, J.M.; et al. Targeted synthesis of a porous aromatic framework with high stability and exceptionally high surface area. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9457–9460. [Google Scholar]
  29. Garibay, S.J.; Weston, M.H.; Mondloch, J.E.; Colón, Y.J.; Farha, O.K.; Hupp, J.T.; Nguyen, S.T. Accessing functionalized porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs) through a de novo approach. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 1515–1519. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tian, Y.; Song, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Muhammad, F.; Ma, T.; Chen, M.; Zhu, G. Understanding the desulphurization process in an ionic porous aromatic framework. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Vilian, A.T.E.; Puthiaraj, P.; Kwak, C.H.; Hwang, S.K.; Huh, Y.S.; Ahn, W.S.; Han, Y.K. Fabrication of Palladium Nanoparticles on Porous Aromatic Frameworks as a Sensing Platform to Detect Vanillin. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 12740–12747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, Y.; Wang, T.; Jing, X.; Zhu, G. Phosphine-based porous aromatic frameworks for gold nanoparticle immobilization with superior catalytic activities. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 10004–10009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nikolaev, S.A.; Zanaveskin, L.N.; Smirnov, V.V.; Averyanov, V.A.; Zanaveskin, K.L. Catalytic hydrogenation of alkyne and alkadiene impurities from alkenes. Practical and theoretical aspects. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2009, 78, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. Selectivity enhancement in heterogeneous catalysis induced by reaction modifiers. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2000, 200, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xing, R.; Liu, Y.; Wu, H.; Li, X.; He, M.; Wu, P. Preparation of active and robust palladium nanoparticle catalysts stabilized by diamine-functionalized mesoporous polymers. Chem. Commun. 2008, 47, 6297–6299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karakhanov, E.; Maximov, A.; Terenina, M.; Vinokurov, V.; Kulikov, L.; Makeeva, D.; Glotov, A. Selective hydrogenation of terminal alkynes over palladium nanoparticles within the pores of amino-modified porous aromatic frameworks. Catal. Today 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Verde-Sesto, E.; Merino, E.; Rangel-Rangel, E.; Corma, A.; Iglesias, M.; Sánchez, F. Postfunctionalized Porous Polymeric Aromatic Frameworks with an Organocatalyst and a Transition Metal Catalyst for Tandem Condensation-Hydrogenation Reactions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1078–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, L.; Chen, Z.; Zhong, H.; Wang, R. Urea-based porous organic frameworks: Effective supports for catalysis in neat water. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 3050–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhong, H.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, F.; Li, L.; Wang, R. Click-based porous organic framework containing chelating terdentate units and its application in hydrogenation of olefins. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 7502–7508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tang, D.; Sun, X.; Zhao, D.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, W.; Xu, X.; Zhao, Z. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Xerogels Supporting Palladium Nanoparticles for Selective Hydrogenation Reactions: The Role of Pyridine Nitrogen Species. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 1291–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Méry, D.; Astruc, D. Dendritic catalysis: Major concepts and recent progress. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 1965–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lu, S.; Hu, Y.; Wan, S.; McCaffrey, R.; Jin, Y.; Gu, H.; Zhang, W. Synthesis of Ultrafine and Highly Dispersed Metal Nanoparticles Confined in a Thioether-Containing Covalent Organic Framework and Their Catalytic Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17082–17088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, Q.; Tsumori, N.; Kitta, M.; Xu, Q. Fast Dehydrogenation of Formic Acid over Palladium Nanoparticles Immobilized in Nitrogen-Doped Hierarchically Porous Carbon. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 12041–12045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Neeli, C.K.P.; Puthiaraj, P.; Lee, Y.R.; Chung, Y.M.; Baeck, S.H.; Ahn, W.S. Transfer hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline in water using Pd nanoparticles immobilized on amine-functionalized UiO-66. Catal. Today 2018, 303, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sadjadi, S.; Koohestani, F. Pd immobilized on polymeric network containing imidazolium salt, cyclodextrin and carbon nanotubes: Efficient and recyclable catalyst for the hydrogenation of nitroarenes in aqueous media. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 301, 112414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhou, S.; Shang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, R.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Huang, Y.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, T. Pd Single-Atom Catalysts on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene for the Highly Selective Photothermal Hydrogenation of Acetylene to Ethylene. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1900509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Crooks, R.M.; Zhao, M.; Sun, L.; Chechik, V.; Yeung, L.K. Dendrimer-encapsulated metal nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, and applications to catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Boronoev, M.P.; Zolotukhina, A.V.; Ignatyeva, V.I.; Terenina, M.V.; Maximov, A.L.; Karakhanov, E.A. Palladium Catalysts Based on Mesoporous Organic Materials in Semihydrogenation of Alkynes. Macromol. Symp. 2016, 363, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. King, A.S.H.; Twyman, L.J. Heterogeneous and solid supported dendrimer catalysts. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin 2002, 2, 2209–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Soğukömeroğulları, H.G.; Karataş, Y.; Celebi, M.; Gülcan, M.; Sönmez, M.; Zahmakiran, M. Palladium nanoparticles decorated on amine functionalized graphene nanosheets as excellent nanocatalyst for the hydrogenation of nitrophenols to aminophenol counterparts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 369, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, J.; Yuan, M.; Xu, D.; Zhao, H.; Zhu, Y.; Fan, M.; Zhang, F.; Dong, Z. Highly dispersed ultrafine palladium nanoparticles encapsulated in a triazinyl functionalized porous organic polymer as a highly efficient catalyst for transfer hydrogenation of aldehydes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 18242–18251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xu, D.; Wang, F.; Yu, G.; Zhao, H.; Yang, J.; Yuan, M.; Zhang, X.; Dong, Z. Aminal-based Hypercrosslinked Polymer Modified with Small Palladium Nanoparticles for Efficiently Catalytic Reduction of Nitroarenes. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 4569–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yuan, Y.; Sun, F.; Ren, H.; Jing, X.; Wang, W.; Ma, H.; Zhao, H.; Zhu, G. Targeted synthesis of a porous aromatic framework with a high adsorption capacity for organic molecules. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 13498–13502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gangadharan, D.; Dhandhala, N.; Dixit, D.; Thakur, R.S.; Popat, K.M.; Anand, P.S. Investigation of solid supported dendrimers for water disinfection. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 124, 1384–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lu, W.; Sculley, J.P.; Yuan, D.; Krishna, R.; Wei, Z.; Zhou, H.C. Polyamine-tethered porous polymer networks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7480–7484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Law, R.V.; Sherrington, D.C.; Snape, C.E.; Ando, I.; Korosu, H. Solid State 13C MAS NMR Studies of Anion Exchange Resins and Their Precursors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 2740–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rangel-Rangel, E.; Verde-Sesto, E.; Rasero-Almansa, A.M.; Iglesias, M.; Sánchez, F. Porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs) as efficient supports for N-heterocyclic carbene catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 6037–6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Jeromenok, J.; Weber, J. Restricted access: On the nature of adsorption/desorption hysteresis in amorphous, microporous polymeric materials. Langmuir 2013, 29, 12982–12989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Modification of PAF-20 and PAF-30. Reagents: (i) CH2O, HCl, P2O5, AcOH, (ii) diethanolamine, dioxane, (iii) SOCl2, dioxane, (iv) NH(EtOH)2, dioxane.
Scheme 1. Modification of PAF-20 and PAF-30. Reagents: (i) CH2O, HCl, P2O5, AcOH, (ii) diethanolamine, dioxane, (iii) SOCl2, dioxane, (iv) NH(EtOH)2, dioxane.
Catalysts 10 01106 sch001
Figure 1. Solid-state 13C cross polarization-magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (CP-MAS NMR) spectra of obtained materials.
Figure 1. Solid-state 13C cross polarization-magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (CP-MAS NMR) spectra of obtained materials.
Catalysts 10 01106 g001
Figure 2. Low-temperature N2 adsorption on PAF-based materials.
Figure 2. Low-temperature N2 adsorption on PAF-based materials.
Catalysts 10 01106 g002aCatalysts 10 01106 g002b
Figure 3. Transmission electron microscopy microphotographs and particle size distribution for Pd-PAF-20-G0 and Pd-PAF-30-G0.
Figure 3. Transmission electron microscopy microphotographs and particle size distribution for Pd-PAF-20-G0 and Pd-PAF-30-G0.
Catalysts 10 01106 g003
Figure 4. TEM microphotographs and particle size distribution for Pd-PAF-20-G1 and Pd-PAF-30-G1.
Figure 4. TEM microphotographs and particle size distribution for Pd-PAF-20-G1 and Pd-PAF-30-G1.
Catalysts 10 01106 g004
Figure 5. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements for obtained palladium catalysts.
Figure 5. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements for obtained palladium catalysts.
Catalysts 10 01106 g005
Figure 6. TEM microphotographs and particle size distribution for Pd-PAF-20-G0 and Pd-PAF-30-G0 after five runs of the recycle process.
Figure 6. TEM microphotographs and particle size distribution for Pd-PAF-20-G0 and Pd-PAF-30-G0 after five runs of the recycle process.
Catalysts 10 01106 g006
Table 1. Results of low-temperature nitrogen adsorption-desorption for obtained materials.
Table 1. Results of low-temperature nitrogen adsorption-desorption for obtained materials.
SamplesMaterials Based on PAF-20Materials Based on PAF-30
SBET, m2/gTotal Pore Volume (BJH), cm3/gSBET, m2/gTotal Pore Volume (BJH), cm3/g
PAF5790.3165060.311
PAF-CH2Cl4720.2644360.262
PAF-G0290.026610.054
PAF-G150.001380.007
Table 2. Elemental analysis of synthesized materials.
Table 2. Elemental analysis of synthesized materials.
MaterialElement Content, Mass. %
ClN
PAF-20-CH2Cl3.08%-
PAF-30-CH2Cl3.00%-
PAF-20-G00.91%1.84%
PAF-30-G01.19%1.68%
PAF-20-G12.43%1.88%
PAF-30-G13.30%2.16%
Table 3. Palladium content by atomic absorption spectroscopy in synthesized catalysts.
Table 3. Palladium content by atomic absorption spectroscopy in synthesized catalysts.
MaterialPd-PAF-20-G0Pd-PAF-30-G0Pd-PAF-20-G1Pd-PAF-30-G1
Pd, mass %2.41.00.61.8
Table 4. Components of the XPS spectra.
Table 4. Components of the XPS spectra.
CatalystsCONPdCl
Pd-PAF-20-G082.2 at.%13.3 at.%1.5 at.%2.8 at.%0.1 at.%
Pd-PAF-30-G085.6 at.%11.2 at.%1.7 at.%1.3 at.%0.2 at.%
Pd-PAF-20-G187.9 at.%6.8 at.%3.4 at.%0.3 at.%0.6 at.%
Pd-PAF-30-G187.0 at.%9.2 at.%3.0 at.%0.3 at.%0.5 at.%
Table 5. Peak parameters for XPS spectra of obtained palladium catalysts.
Table 5. Peak parameters for XPS spectra of obtained palladium catalysts.
CatalystParameterPd0PdOx
Pd-PAF-20-G0Binding energy, eVPd 3d5/2 334.85 eVPd 3d5/2 336.58 eV
Pd 3d3/2 340.10 eVPd 3d3/2 341.82 eV
Content, %6733
Pd-PAF-30-G0Binding energy, eVPd 3d5/2 334.65 eVPd 3d5/2 336.75 eV
Pd 3d3/2 339.96 eVPd 3d3/2 341.91 eV
Content, %5644
Pd-PAF-20-G1Binding energy, eVPd 3d5/2 335.11 eVPd 3d5/2 336.8 eV
Pd 3d3/2 340.47 eVPd 3d3/2 342.43 eV
Content, %4851
Pd-PAF-30-G1Binding energy, eVPd 3d5/2 335.45 eVPd 3d5/2 337.07 eV
Pd 3d3/2 340.89 eVPd 3d3/2 342.56 eV
Content, %5644
Table 6. Hydrogenation of unsaturated hydrocarbons on palladium catalysts.
Table 6. Hydrogenation of unsaturated hydrocarbons on palladium catalysts.
SubstrateReaction ProductsProduct Yield, %
Pd-PAF-20-G0Pd-PAF-30-G0Pd-PAF-20-G1Pd-PAF-30-G1
Hexyne-1Hexene-18594935
Hexane46--
Hexene-1Hexane34100<1<1
CyclohexeneCyclohexane1112--
1,3-cyclohexadieneCyclohexadiene79--
Octyne-1Octene-1699--
Octyne-4Octene-434--
Octene-1Octane799<11
Isomerization products85<155
2,5-dimethyl-2,4-hexadiene2,5-dimethyl-3-hexene85<1<1
2,5-dimethylhexane<15<11
2,5-dimethyl-2-hexene1882--
PhenylacetyleneStyrene2137--
StyreneEthylbenzene1026--
4-methoxystyrene4-methoxyethylbenzene34--
Reaction conditions: 1 mg of the catalyst; substrate:metal = 22,500:1 (Pd-PAF-20-G0), 54,000:1 (Pd-PAF-20-G1), 90,000:1 (Pd-PAF-30-G0), 30,000:1 (Pd-PAF-30-G1), 80 °C, 1.0 MPa H2, 30 min.
Table 7. Specific activity of synthesized catalysts.
Table 7. Specific activity of synthesized catalysts.
SubstratePd-PAF-20-G0Pd-PAF-30-G0Pd-PAF-20-G1Pd-PAF-30-G1
Hexyne-194,600323,400100,700189,800
Hexene-134,600305,100--
Cyclohexene11,20036,600--
1,3-cyclohexadiene710027,400
Octyne-17100302,000--
Octyne-4560012,200
Octene-17100305,100--
2,5-dimethyl-2,4-hexadiene27,500294,900--
Phenylacetylene22,400115,900--
Styrene10,20079,300--
4-methoxystyrene560012,200
Table 8. Results of recyclability tests.
Table 8. Results of recyclability tests.
CatalystProduct Yield, %
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5
Pd-PAF-20-G03428161617
Pd-PAF-30-G09998868483
Table 9. Components of the XPS spectra after five runs of the recycle process.
Table 9. Components of the XPS spectra after five runs of the recycle process.
SampleCONClPd
Pd-PAF-20-G0Before reaction82.2 at.%13.3 at.%1.5 at.%0.1 at.%2.8 at.%
After 5 runs79.4 at.%16.1 at.%2.1 at.%0.2 at.%2.1 at.%
Pd-PAF-30-G0Before reaction85.6 at.%11.2 at.%1.7 at.%0.2 at.%1.3 at.%
After 5 runs85.6 at.%12.3 at.%0.9 at.%0.2 at.%1.0 at.%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kulikov, L.; Kalinina, M.; Makeeva, D.; Maximov, A.; Kardasheva, Y.; Terenina, M.; Karakhanov, E. Palladium Catalysts Based on Porous Aromatic Frameworks, Modified with Ethanolamino-Groups, for Hydrogenation of Alkynes, Alkenes and Dienes. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101106

AMA Style

Kulikov L, Kalinina M, Makeeva D, Maximov A, Kardasheva Y, Terenina M, Karakhanov E. Palladium Catalysts Based on Porous Aromatic Frameworks, Modified with Ethanolamino-Groups, for Hydrogenation of Alkynes, Alkenes and Dienes. Catalysts. 2020; 10(10):1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101106

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kulikov, Leonid, Maria Kalinina, Daria Makeeva, Anton Maximov, Yulia Kardasheva, Maria Terenina, and Eduard Karakhanov. 2020. "Palladium Catalysts Based on Porous Aromatic Frameworks, Modified with Ethanolamino-Groups, for Hydrogenation of Alkynes, Alkenes and Dienes" Catalysts 10, no. 10: 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101106

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop