Previous Article in Journal
MoviGestion: Automating Fleet Management for Personnel Transport Companies Using a Conversational System and IoT Powered by AI
Previous Article in Special Issue
Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Education: A Systematic Review of Teachers’ Professional Development Needs for AI Integration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial “Transformative Approaches in Education: Harnessing AI, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality for Innovative Teaching and Learning”

by
Stamatios Papadakis
Department of Preschool Education, University of Crete, 74100 Rethimno, Greece
Computers 2026, 15(2), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15020072
Submission received: 23 January 2026 / Accepted: 26 January 2026 / Published: 27 January 2026

1. Introduction

When we first conceptualized this Special Issue, the educational community was arguably in a state of reaction—reacting to the sudden accessibility of generative AI, the maturing of immersive hardware, and the urgent post-pandemic need for digital resilience. However, the sixteen articles collected in this Special Issue, “Transformative Approaches in Education: Harnessing AI, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality for Innovative Teaching and Learning”, demonstrate that we have moved beyond reaction to a phase of rigorous, evidence-based integration.
This Special Issue does not merely celebrate new tools; it interrogates them. From the neural architecture of reinforcement learning algorithms to the emotional perceptions of sixth-graders in Greece, the research presented here offers a panoramic view of a field that is rapidly finding its footing. We are witnessing a shift; technology is no longer an external “add-on” but a fundamental structural element of modern pedagogy.

2. The Human Element: Perceptions, Emotions, and Well-being

A defining strength of this Special Issue is its refusal to lose sight of the human being behind the screen. Contribution 1, by Kotsidis et al., opens up a fascinating window into the minds of “digital natives”, revealing that Greek primary students have a “hybrid” understanding of AI—perceiving it simultaneously as a helpful robotic assistant and a potential threat. This nuanced ambivalence suggests that AI literacy must address emotional regulation as much as technical skill.
This human-centric focus extends to higher education, where the dynamic between student and machine is evolving into a partnership. Contribution 2, by Perifanou and Economides, documents the emergence of “collaborative prompting”, where students effectively treat ChatGPT version GPT-3.5 as a teammate rather than a search engine. Contribution 3, by Szűts et al., deepens this analysis by applying Flow Theory, suggesting that when AI is integrated seamlessly, it can heighten immersion rather than distract from it.
However, the integration of these tools must also safeguard student welfare. Contribution 4, by Olla et al., presents “Luna”, a mental health chatbot, demonstrating that AI can serve as a scalable, immediate first line of defense for student well-being, provided that strict ethical guardrails are maintained.

3. Infrastructures of Adoption and Inclusion

Innovation cannot exist in a vacuum; it requires institutional readiness. Contribution 5, by Abulail et al., utilizes a robust integrated model (DOI, TOE, and TAM) to identify friction points in higher education, highlighting that despite high perceived utility, institutional infrastructure remains a significant bottleneck. This is echoed in Contribution 6, by Alshafei et al., who survey design education in Jordan. Their findings reveal a “digital divide” within curricula themselves: while traditional CAD tools are ubiquitous, transformative technologies such as AI and VR remain underutilized due to steep learning curves and costs.
Crucially, this Special Issue underscores the fact that technology must serve equity. Contribution 7, by Iatraki et al., provides compelling evidence that Digital Learning Objects (DLOs) can successfully break down barriers in public health education for students with intellectual disabilities. Similarly, in Contribution 8, Aravantinos et al. argue through a systematic review that teacher professional development must pivot from purely technical training to fostering pedagogical reasoning and inclusive practices.

4. The Engineering of Adaptive Learning

Behind the user interface lies the sophisticated engineering that makes adaptive learning possible. Several contributions in this Special Issue push the technical boundaries of what educational systems can achieve. In Contribution 9, Dosaru et al. tackle the scalability crisis in coding education with “LambdaChecker”, optimizing cloudlet resource allocation to handle mass-scale automated code evaluation without performance degradation.
On the algorithmic frontier, in Contribution 10, Farooq et al. explore curiosity-driven exploration in reinforcement learning. By designing agents that are intrinsically motivated by novelty, their work offers a blueprint for future adaptive tutoring systems that can “learn to teach” by exploring student needs dynamically. This aligns with Contribution 11, by Angeioplastis et al., whose “Learning Style Decoder” utilizes deep neural networks to predict student preferences from LMS behavior, moving us closer to truly personalized education.

5. Cognitive Frameworks and Immersive Realities

Finally, we see how immersive tools are reshaping the cognitive architecture of learning. Contribution 12, by Stănescu et al., demonstrates that high-fidelity VR is not just a gimmick but a necessity for teaching counter-intuitive physics concepts such as hydrodynamics. In the cultural sector, Contribution 13, by Todino et al., shows how VR and AI can revitalize museum education, transforming static folk art into living experiences.
However, traditional cognitive structures remain vital. Both Contribution 14 by De la Hoz Serrano et al. and Contribution 15 by Kefalis et al. reinforce that whether we use educational robotics or digital mind maps, the development of computational thinking relies on structured pedagogical taxonomies (such as SOLO) to organize complex information. Contribution 16, by Kinari et al., bridges this gap between structure and freedom with a guided self-study platform for mobile programming, proving that documentation and visual output must be integrated to prevent “copy–paste” learning.

6. Conclusions

The diversity of these sixteen contributions—spanning from the algorithmic “curiosity” of machines to the very human curiosity of children—confirms that we are in a transformative era. We are no longer asking if AI and VR have a place in education; we are defining the specific, evidence-based methodologies for how they should be used.
Due to the overwhelming success and high citation potential of these articles, I am pleased to announce the launch of a Second Edition of this Special Issue. We invite the academic community to continue this vital conversation.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Kotsidis, K.; Chionas, G.; Anastasiades, P. Exploring Greek Upper Primary School Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: A Qualitative Study Across Cognitive, Emotional, Behavioral, and Ethical Dimensions. Computers 2026, 15, 14.
  • Perifanou, M.; Economides, A.A. Students Collaboratively Prompting ChatGPT. Computers 2025, 14, 156.
  • Szűts, Z.; Lengyelné Molnár, T.; Racskó, R.; Vaughan, G.; Ceglédi, S.; Dominek, D.L. Examining the Flow Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence in Real-Time Classroom Applications. Computers 2025, 14, 275.
  • Olla, P.; Barnes, A.; Elliott, L.; Abumeeiz, M.; Olla, V.; Tan, J. Deploying a Mental Health Chatbot in Higher Education: The Development and Evaluation of Luna, an AI-Based Mental Health Support System. Computers 2025, 14, 227.
  • Abulail, R.N.; Badran, O.N.; Shkoukani, M.A.; Omeish, F. Exploring the Factors Influencing AI Adoption Intentions in Higher Education: An Integrated Model of DOI, TOE, and TAM. Computers 2025, 14, 230.
  • Alshafei, I.A.; AlDweik, S.M.; Hassouneh, M.A.; AbuKarki, H.; Jarrar, A.A.; Mansour, Q.S. Digital Transformation in Design Education: Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities in Jordanian Higher Education. Computers 2025, 14, 535.
  • Iatraki, G.; Mikropoulos, T.A.; Mallidis-Malessas, P.; Santos, C. Leveraging Technology to Break Barriers in Public Health for Students with Intellectual Disabilities. Computers 2025, 14, 169.
  • Aravantinos, S.; Lavidas, K.; Komis, V.; Karalis, T.; Papadakis, S. Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Education: A Systematic Review of Teachers’ Professional Development Needs for AI Integration. Computers 2026, 15, 49.
  • Dosaru, D.-F.; Olteanu, A.-C.; Țăpuș, N. Optimizing Cloudlets for Faster Feedback in LLM-Based Code-Evaluation Systems. Computers 2025, 14, 557.
  • Farooq, S.S.; Rahman, H.; Abdul Wahid, S.; Alyan Ansari, M.; Abdul Wahid, S.; Lee, H. Curiosity-Driven Exploration in Reinforcement Learning: An Adaptive Self-Supervised Learning Approach for Playing Action Games. Computers 2025, 14, 434.
  • Angeioplastis, A.; Aliprantis, J.; Konstantakis, M.; Varsamis, D.; Tsimpiris, A. The Learning Style Decoder: FSLSM-Guided Behavior Mapping Meets Deep Neural Prediction in LMS Settings. Computers 2025, 14, 377.
  • Stănescu, A.-B.; Travadel, S.; Rughiniş, R.-V. Virtual Reality for Hydrodynamics: Evaluating an Original Physics-Based Submarine Simulator Through User Engagement. Computers 2025, 14, 348.
  • Todino, M.D.; Pitri, E.; Fella, A.; Michaelidou, A.; Campitiello, L.; Placanica, F.; Di Tore, S.; Sibilio, M. Bridging Tradition and Innovation: Transformative Educational Practices in Museums with AI and VR. Computers 2025, 14, 257.
  • De la Hoz Serrano, A.; Álvarez-Murillo, A.; Fernández Torrado, E.J.; González Maestre, M.Á.; Melo Niño, L.V. A Case Study of Computational Thinking Analysis Using SOLO Taxonomy in Scientific-Mathematical Learning. Computers 2025, 14, 192.
  • Kefalis, C.; Skordoulis, C.; Drigas, A. A Systematic Review of Mind Maps, STEM Education, Algorithmic and Procedural Learning. Computers 2025, 14, 204.
  • Kinari, S.A.; Funabiki, N.; Aung, S.T.; Kyaw, H.H.S. A Guided Self-Study Platform of Integrating Documentation, Code, Visual Output, and Exercise for Flutter Cross-Platform Mobile Programming. Computers 2025, 14, 417.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Papadakis, S. Editorial “Transformative Approaches in Education: Harnessing AI, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality for Innovative Teaching and Learning”. Computers 2026, 15, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15020072

AMA Style

Papadakis S. Editorial “Transformative Approaches in Education: Harnessing AI, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality for Innovative Teaching and Learning”. Computers. 2026; 15(2):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15020072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Papadakis, Stamatios. 2026. "Editorial “Transformative Approaches in Education: Harnessing AI, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality for Innovative Teaching and Learning”" Computers 15, no. 2: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15020072

APA Style

Papadakis, S. (2026). Editorial “Transformative Approaches in Education: Harnessing AI, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality for Innovative Teaching and Learning”. Computers, 15(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15020072

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop