Next Article in Journal
15-Day Duration of Venetoclax Combined with Azacitidine in Treatment-Naive Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Prospective Multicenter Study
Previous Article in Journal
Global Patterns and Temporal Trends in Ovarian and Uterine Cancer Mortality Attributable to High Body-Mass Index, 1990–2023
Previous Article in Special Issue
Root Cause Analysis of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Imaging Not Resulting in a Cancer Diagnosis in the 18 Months Prior to Diagnosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Risk Scores for Stratifying Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Optimizing Surveillance Strategies

1
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Biomedical Park Hospital, Hsinchu 302058, Taiwan
2
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100229, Taiwan
3
Hepatitis Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100229, Taiwan
4
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Douliou 640203, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2026, 18(1), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010158
Submission received: 27 November 2025 / Revised: 25 December 2025 / Accepted: 30 December 2025 / Published: 2 January 2026

Simple Summary

This review highlights the limitations of current hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance and emphasizes the need for improved identification of individuals at risk. It summarizes validated HCC risk scores that rely on readily available demographic, clinical, or molecular parameters, rather than specialized or inaccessible tests.

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global health burden, with poor outcomes largely due to diagnosis at an advanced stage and the limited performance of current surveillance tools. Ultrasound with alpha fetoprotein (AFP) provides insufficient sensitivity for early-stage detection, highlighting the need to better identify the at-risk population. Focus of the review: Many HCC risk scores have been proposed; however, some depend on specialized laboratory data that are not widely available. This review summarizes risk scores that show reliable discrimination and rely on demographic, clinical, or molecular information that can be readily obtained in routine care. Conclusions: Advances in HCC risk scores support the move toward surveillance approaches based on individual risk. These tools can improve risk stratification, increase the likelihood of early detection, and potentially support better outcomes for people who belong to the at-risk population for HCC.
Keywords: risk scores; risk stratification; hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance risk scores; risk stratification; hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, Y.-P.; Chen, Y.-C.; Liu, C.-H. Risk Scores for Stratifying Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Optimizing Surveillance Strategies. Cancers 2026, 18, 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010158

AMA Style

Chang Y-P, Chen Y-C, Liu C-H. Risk Scores for Stratifying Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Optimizing Surveillance Strategies. Cancers. 2026; 18(1):158. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Yu-Ping, Yun-Chu Chen, and Chen-Hua Liu. 2026. "Risk Scores for Stratifying Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Optimizing Surveillance Strategies" Cancers 18, no. 1: 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010158

APA Style

Chang, Y.-P., Chen, Y.-C., & Liu, C.-H. (2026). Risk Scores for Stratifying Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Optimizing Surveillance Strategies. Cancers, 18(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010158

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop