Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Used Alone Is Non-Inferior to the Combination of Radioactive Tracer and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide in Detecting Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Protocol
2.2. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer Stat Facts Vulvar Cancer. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/vulva.html (accessed on 15 August 2025).
- Akhtar-Danesh, N.; Elit, L.; Lytwyn, A. Trends in Incidence and Survival of Women with Invasive Vulvar Cancer in the United States and Canada: A Population-Based Study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 134, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homesley, H.D.; Bundy, B.N.; Sedlis, A.; Yordan, E.; Berek, J.S.; Jahshan, A.; Mortel, R. Assessment of Current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging of Vulvar Carcinoma Relative to Prognostic Factors for Survival (A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991, 164, 997–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Der Zee, A.G.J.; Oonk, M.H.; De Hullu, J.A.; Ansink, A.C.; Vergote, I.; Verheijen, R.H.; Maggioni, A.; Gaarenstroom, K.N.; Baldwin, P.J.; Van Dorst, E.B.; et al. Sentinel Node Dissection Is Safe in the Treatment of Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 884–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Te Grootenhuis, N.C.; Van Der Zee, A.G.J.; Van Doorn, H.C.; Van Der Velden, J.; Vergote, I.; Zanagnolo, V.; Baldwin, P.J.; Gaarenstroom, K.N.; Van Dorst, E.B.; Trum, J.W.; et al. Sentinel Nodes in Vulvar Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up of the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel Nodes in Vulvar Cancer (GROINSS-V) I. Gynecol. Oncol. 2016, 140, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Levenback, C.F.; Ali, S.; Coleman, R.L.; Gold, M.A.; Fowler, J.M.; Judson, P.L.; Bell, M.C.; De Geest, K.; Spirtos, N.M.; Potkul, R.K.; et al. Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Women With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 3786–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oonk, M.H.M.; Planchamp, F.; Baldwin, P.; Mahner, S.; Mirza, M.R.; Fischerová, D.; Creutzberg, C.L.; Guillot, E.; Garganese, G.; Lax, S.; et al. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer—Update 2023. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2023, 33, 1023–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NCCN Guidelines Version 1. 2025 Vulvar Cancer. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/vulvar.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2025).
- Pinelli, M.; Gerardi, C.; Lettieri, E.; Maioru, M.; Marone, L.; Bertoldi, L.; Navanteri, G.; Costantini, M.; Botti, C.; Pellini, F. Comparison of Indocyanine Green with Conventional Tracers for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, Organizational and Economic Impact. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0309336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crane, L.M.A.; Themelis, G.; Arts, H.J.G.; Buddingh, K.T.; Brouwers, A.H.; Ntziachristos, V.; Van Dam, G.M.; Van Der Zee, A.G.J. Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Vulvar Cancer: First Clinical Results. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011, 120, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Broach, V.; Abu-Rustum, N.R.; Sonoda, Y.; Brown, C.L.; Jewell, E.; Gardner, G.; Chi, D.S.; Zivanovic, O.; Leitao, M.M., Jr. Evolution and Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Vulvar Cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jedryka, M.A.; Klimczak, P.; Kryszpin, M.; Matkowski, R. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide: A Novel Tracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Vulvar Cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 1280–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Valle, D.; Ruiz, R.; Lekuona, A.; Cobas, P.; Jaunarena, I.; Gorostidi, M.; Cespedes, J. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO) for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Vulvar Cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2024, 187, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olawaiye, A.B.; Cuello, M.A.; Rogers, L.J. Cancer of the Vulva: 2021 Update. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021, 155, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. Published 27 November 2017. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. Available online: https://dctd.cancer.gov/research/ctep-trials/for-sites/adverse-events/ctcae-v5-5x7.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2025).
- Dindo, D.; Demartines, N.; Clavien, P.-A. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey. Ann. Surg. 2004, 240, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. 2001. Available online: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm (accessed on 11 July 2025).
- Vidya, R.; Khosla, M.; Laws, S.; Harvey, J.; Kaushik, M.; Mullapudi, N.A.; Macmillan, D. Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Using Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide versus Radioisotope in Early Stage Breast Cancer: The UK SentiMag Trial (SMART Study). Surgeon 2023, 21, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubio, I.T.; Rodriguez-Revuelto, R.; Espinosa-Bravo, M.; Siso, C.; Rivero, J.; Esgueva, A. A Randomized Study Comparing Different Doses of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Tracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: The SUNRISE Study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 46, 2195–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karakatsanis, A.; Daskalakis, K.; Stålberg, P.; Olofsson, H.; Andersson, Y.; Eriksson, S.; Bergkvist, L.; Wärnberg, F. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as the Sole Method for Sentinel Node Biopsy Detection in Patients with Breast Cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2017, 104, 1675–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Man, V.; Suen, D.; Kwong, A. Use of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO) Versus Conventional Technique in Sentinel Lymph Node Detection for Breast Cancer: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2023, 30, 3237–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vida, B.; Lintner, B.; Várbíró, S.; Merkely, P.; Lőczi, L.L.; Ács, N.; Tóth, R.; Keszthelyi, M. Assessing the Comparative Efficacy of Sentinel Lymph Node Detection Techniques in Vulvar Cancer: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Life 2024, 14, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornel, K.M.C.; Mehta, M.P.; Swift, B.E.; Covens, A.; Vicus, D.; Kupets, R.S.; Gien, L.T. The Use of Indocyanine Green (ICG) for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Vulvar Cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2025, 196, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Donna, M.C.; Quartuccio, N.; Giallombardo, V.; Sturiale, L.; Arnone, A.; Ricapito, R.; Sozzi, G.; Arnone, G.; Chiantera, V. Detection of Sentinel Lymph Node in Vulvar Cancer Using 99mTc-Labeled Colloid Lymphoscintigraphy, Blue Dye, and Indocyanine-Green Fluorescence: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Published in 2010–2020. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2022, 307, 1677–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benmoulay-Rigollot, C.; Karpathiou, G.; Prevot-Bitot, N.; Heinemann, M.; Trombert-Paviot, B.; Barjat, T.; Chauleur, C. Performance of Indocyanine Green Compared to 99mTc-Nanocolloids for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Early Vulvar Cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29, 8084–8092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robison, K.; Roque, D.; McCourt, C.; Stuckey, A.; DiSilvestro, P.A.; Sung, C.J.; Steinhoff, M.; Granai, C.O.; Moore, R.G. Long-Term Follow-up of Vulvar Cancer Patients Evaluated with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 133, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deken, M.M.; Van Doorn, H.C.; Verver, D.; Boogerd, L.S.F.; De Valk, K.S.; Rietbergen, D.D.D.; Van Poelgeest, M.I.E.; De Kroon, C.D.; Beltman, J.J.; Van Leeuwen, F.W.B.; et al. Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Compared to Standard Sentinel Lymph Node Detection with Blue Dye in Patients with Vulvar Cancer—A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020, 159, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cham, S.; Chen, L.; Burke, W.M.; Hou, J.Y.; Tergas, A.I.; Hu, J.C.; Ananth, C.V.; Neugut, A.I.; Hershman, D.L.; Wright, J.D. Utilization and Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Vulvar Cancer. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 128, 754–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hermann, C.E.; Nasioudis, D.; Mastroyannis, S.A.; Latif, N.A.; Haggerty, A.F.; Giuntoli Ii, R.L.; Cory, L.; Kim, S.H.; Morgan, M.A.; Ko, E.M. Utilization and Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early Stage Vulvar Cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2021, 31, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Froeding, L.P.; Høgdall, C.; Kristensen, E.; Zobbe, V.; Niemann, I.; Ørtoft, G.; Thranov, I.; Mathiesen, O.; Mortensen, J.; Schnack, T.H. Recurrence and Survival Rates in Node Negative Patients after Sentinel Node Biopsy for Early-Stage Vulva Cancer—A Nationwide Study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020, 156, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coulter, J.; Gleeson, N. Local and Regional Recurrence of Vulval Cancer: Management Dilemmas. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2003, 17, 663–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Clinical Feature | All Study Patients (n = 60) | Combined Group (Tc-99 and SPIO) (n = 20) | SPIO-alone Group (n = 40) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average age (years) | 70.0 | 73.8 | 68.1 |
| Average BMI (kg/m2) | 29.8 | 30.8 | 29.3 |
| ECOG performance status 1 | 32 (53.3%) | 8 (40%) | 24 (60%) |
| ECOG performance status 2 | 28 (46.7%) | 12 (60%) | 16 (40%) |
| Average tumor size (mm) | 23.1 | 26.6 | 21.3 |
| Tumor grade 1 | 28(46.7%) | 7 (35%) | 21 (52.5%) |
| Tumor grade 2 | 31 (51.6%) | 13 (65%) | 18 (45%) |
| Tumor grade 3 | 1 (1.7%) | 0 | 1 (2.5%) |
| Tumor location central | 45 (75%) | 19 (95%) | 26 (65%) |
| Tumor location lateral | 15 (25%) | 1 (5%) | 14 (35%) |
| Average stromal infiltration (mm) | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.1 |
| LVSI positive | 5 (8.3%) | 2 (10%) | 3 (7.5%) |
| LVSI negative | 55 (91.7%) | 18 (90%) | 37 (92.5%) |
| Unilateral sentinel lymph node assessment | 18 (30%) | 4 (25%) | 14 (35%) |
| Bilateral sentinel lymph node assessment | 42 (70%) | 16 (75%) | 26 (65%) |
| Studied Feature | Combined Group (Tc-99 and SPIO) | SPIO-Alone Group | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) (mean ± SD) | 73.8 (8.9) | 68.1 (10.7) | 0.0468 t |
| BMI (kg/m2) (median (range)) | 30.8 (22–45) | 29.3 (18–36) | 0.1185 m |
| Total hospitalization time (days) (median (range)) | 8.6 (3–19) | 5.3 (2–10) | 0.0057 m |
| Postoperative hospitalization time (days) (median (range)) | 6.0 (1–17) | 2.2 (0–6) | 0.0007 m |
| MRI maximum tumor size (mm) (median (range)) | 26.6 (0–40) | 21.3 (0–40) | 0.1548 m |
| Pathological maximum tumor size (mm) MRI maximum tumor size (mm) (median (range)) | 27.6 (3–50) | 22.5 (5–50) | 0.1069 m |
| Stromal infiltration (mm) (median (range)) | 4.5 (1–16) | 4.1 (1–16) | 0.1245 m |
| G1 tumors (n) | 7 | 21 | 0.3001 f |
| G2 tumors (n) | 13 | 18 | |
| G3 tumors (n) | 0 | 1 | |
| LVSI positive (n) | 2 | 18 | >0.9999 f |
| LVSI negative (n) | 3 | 37 |
| Complications After Sentinel Lymph Node Procedure | Combined Group (Tc-99 and SPIO) | SPIO-Alone Group | How Was It Managed? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lymph leakage—CTCEA Grade 1 (n) | 0 | 2 | observation and conservative treatment |
| Lymph leakage—CTCEA Grade 2 (n) | 2 | 2 | drainage and inguinal wound lavage |
| Lymphocele—Clavien–Dindo Grade I (n) | 1 | 1 | observation and conservative treatment |
| Lymphocele—Clavien–Dindo Grade IIIa (n) | 1 | 3 | surgical decompression of lymphocoele with catheter |
| Detection Parameters (%) | All Studied Patients | Combined Group (Tc-99 and SPIO) | SPIO-Alone Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLN detection rate (overall) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| SLN bilateral detection rate (refers to centrally located tumors) | 88.2 | 84.2 | 92.3 |
| Groin detection rate | 92.8 | 90 | 94.3 |
| Nodal detection rate | 53.1 | 42.5 | 61.5 |
| SLN malignancy rate (per patient) | 23.3 | 45 | 12.5 |
| SLN malignancy rate (per groin) | 17.2 | 30 | 10 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jedryka, M.A.; Poprawski, T.; Grobelak, K.; Klimczak, P.; Matkowski, R. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Used Alone Is Non-Inferior to the Combination of Radioactive Tracer and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide in Detecting Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer. Cancers 2025, 17, 3722. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17233722
Jedryka MA, Poprawski T, Grobelak K, Klimczak P, Matkowski R. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Used Alone Is Non-Inferior to the Combination of Radioactive Tracer and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide in Detecting Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer. Cancers. 2025; 17(23):3722. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17233722
Chicago/Turabian StyleJedryka, Marcin A., Tymoteusz Poprawski, Krzysztof Grobelak, Piotr Klimczak, and Rafał Matkowski. 2025. "Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Used Alone Is Non-Inferior to the Combination of Radioactive Tracer and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide in Detecting Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer" Cancers 17, no. 23: 3722. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17233722
APA StyleJedryka, M. A., Poprawski, T., Grobelak, K., Klimczak, P., & Matkowski, R. (2025). Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Used Alone Is Non-Inferior to the Combination of Radioactive Tracer and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide in Detecting Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer. Cancers, 17(23), 3722. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17233722

