Next Article in Journal
Caught in the Act: Tumor-Immune Interactions in Circulation of Patients with Immune Marker Positive Circulating Tumor Cells
Previous Article in Journal
MRI Reflects Meningioma Biology and Molecular Risk
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epigenetic Regulation of NKT-Cell-Related Gene Signatures and Prognostic Implications in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

1
Department of ENT, County Hospital Čakovec, 40000 Čakovec, Croatia
2
Epigenomics and Mechanisms Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 69366 Lyon, France
3
Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia
4
Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
5
Department of Pathology, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia
6
Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia
7
Department of Anatomy, University of Mostar School of Medicine, 88000 Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2025, 17(22), 3666; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223666
Submission received: 13 October 2025 / Revised: 5 November 2025 / Accepted: 12 November 2025 / Published: 15 November 2025

Simple Summary

This study investigates the role of natural killer T (NKT)-cell-related gene signatures and their epigenetic regulation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Transcriptomic data from 81 OPSCC patients were analysed using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), revealing that high NKT cell differentiation scores were significantly associated with improved overall survival. Three genes (ITK, ZNF683, and ATF2) emerged as key prognostic markers linked to immune activation and T-cell signalling pathways. Methylation analyses from TCGA and GEO datasets indicated hypermethylation of ITK and hypomethylation of ZNF683 in tumour samples, suggesting epigenetic regulation of these immune-related genes. The immune microenvironment showed predominant T regulatory cells, macrophages, and neutrophils, alongside high expression of IL-15, IL-18, TNFα, and TGFβ. These findings highlight NKT-cell-associated gene regulation as a potential prognostic and therapeutic target in OPSCC, emphasising the interplay between epigenetics and antitumor immunity.

Abstract

Background: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a major subtype of head and neck cancer, with prognosis increasingly influenced by the tumour immune microenvironment. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes for some patients, reliable predictive biomarkers remain limited. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic relevance and epigenetic regulation of natural killer T (NKT)-cell-related gene signatures in OPSCC. Clinicopathological and transcriptomic data from 81 OPSCC patients were analysed using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) to evaluate immune-related gene set enrichment scores. Associations with overall survival and clinical features were assessed, and candidate prognostic genes were further explored through expression, methylation, and network analyses. Results: High NKT cell differentiation enrichment scores were significantly associated with improved survival and favourable clinical features. Gene-level analyses identified ITK, ZNF683, and ATF2 as key prognostic markers linked to T-cell signalling and epigenetic regulation. Methylation profiling revealed hypermethylation of ITK and hypomethylation of ZNF683 in tumour tissues, suggesting an epigenetic basis for altered gene expression. Conclusions: These findings highlight NKT cell differentiation as a strong prognostic indicator in OPSCC and support further exploration of epigenetic–immunologic interactions as potential therapeutic targets.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Head and neck cancers (HNCs) represent the fifth most common cancer worldwide, making roughly 4% of all cancer cases, with a yearly incidence of around 946,000 estimated cases [1]. Oropharyngeal cancer makes up about 23% of all HNC, with oropharyngeal squamous cancer (OPSCC) being the most common histological type [2,3]. While tobacco and alcohol consumption remain significant risk factors in many developing regions, the rising incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) associated OPSCC in high-income countries has markedly altered both clinical presentation and prognosis [4,5]. Reflecting their clinical, genetical, and immunological differences, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced distinct staging criteria for HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC in its eighth edition, recognising their differences in biological and clinical behaviours [6].
Traditionally, HNC are treated surgically with radiotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy. However, recently, the new paradigm for cancer therapy is based on immune checkpoint inhibition, especially targeted therapy of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis and CTLA-4 [7]. This headway in cancer therapy significantly changed the way we understand OPSCC. Therapies such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, have demonstrated improved survival in recurrent and metastatic HNSCC, including OPSCC, in pivotal trials like CheckMate-141, KEYNOTE-012, and KEYNOTE-040 [8,9,10]. These advances mark a paradigm shift in oncologic care, moving toward more personalised and immune-targeted approaches.
Despite initial clinical success, immunotherapy faces many challenges—one of them being that a substantial proportion of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, which may partly be explained by differences in the tumour microenvironment (TME) and biomarker expression. In addition, PD-L1 expression, tumour mutational burden (TMB), and the presence of specific T cells represent potential predictive biomarkers, but none have yet been universally accepted [11,12]. Furthermore, mechanisms of resistance are present, either innate (e.g., loss of MHC expression) or acquired during therapy [13]. This has led to an intensified search for additional indicators of immune responsiveness and tumour progression.
Given the complex interplay between tumour cells and the surrounding immune landscape, there is increasing interest in leveraging transcriptomic data to better characterise the tumour immune microenvironment (TIM) and identify immune-related gene signatures associated with disease progression and outcome [14,15]. By capturing the expression of immune-related gene signatures at the bulk or single-sample level, research can be conducted to identify patterns associated with immune infiltration, suppression, or activation. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) is a powerful computational method that allows for the quantification of enrichment scores for specific gene sets in individual samples, enabling a more granular analysis of immune cell activity and signalling pathways [14,16]. This approach has been used to dissect the roles of various immune subsets including neutrophils, T cells, B cells, macrophages, and natural killer (NK) cells in tumour biology [16].

2. Materials and Methods

Clinicopathological, methylation and transcriptomic data from patients diagnosed with OPSCC were retrieved from the publicly available cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics database (https://www.cbioportal.org/, “Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA, Firehose Legacy)”, accessed on the 23 December 2024). Out of a list of 530 patients diagnosed with HNC, we filtered 81 patients whose cancers were anatomically located in the oropharynx. No prior sample size calculation was performed. Gene expression profiles were analysed using ssGSEA, implemented via the GenePattern online platform (https://www.genepattern.org/), to assess the enrichment of immune-related pathways. Specifically, gene sets corresponding to activation, differentiation, and proliferation pathways of B cells, T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, NK cells, and NKT cells were evaluated. All gene sets were downloaded from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB, v2024.1, https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/). The full list of immune-related pathways is available in Table 1. Survival analysis was performed for each selected immune-related pathway using Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival curves and log-rank tests. To evaluate the independent prognostic effect of NKT cell differentiation enrichment, a discrete-time survival model using a complementary log-log (cloglog) link was fitted. Bias-reduced (Firth-like) estimates were calculated to minimise small-sample bias. Covariates included HPV status (positive vs. negative) and smoking history (yes vs. no). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported on the log scale. Pathways found to be significantly associated with patient outcomes were further correlated with clinicopathological variables, including tumour grade, clinical stage, p16 status, tobacco, and alcohol consumption status. Gene expression data were downloaded as log2-transformed RNA-Seq V2 RSEM values from TCGA. Expression matrices were normalised using Z-score transformation across samples to mitigate inter-sample variability. We converted gene Z-scores into fold change values by normalising them to the median expression level of the lowest expression category. To explore the downstream molecular mechanisms associated with NKT cell-related genes, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed. Genes significantly correlated with NKT differentiation ES were used as input. Pathways with an adjusted p value < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched. A gene–pathway interaction network was subsequently generated to visualise functional associations between key genes and their corresponding KEGG pathways. Searching the GEO DataSet, we collected methylation profiling data from prior studies performed on oropharyngeal cancer that uploaded data using Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). For comparing continuous variables, ANOVA or t test was used, with Welch correction if necessary. Correlations between continuous variables were performed using Spearman’s method if necessary; for reduction in dimension, principal component analysis was used. Coefficients of correlation were interpreted as suggested by Chan [17]. Statistical significance was defined as a p value less than 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad software, La Jolla, CA, USA, and R (v. 2024.12.1+563)).

3. Results

3.1. Transcriptomic Analysis of Immune-Related Gene Sets

Transcriptomic analysis of 81 OPSCC patients revealed differential enrichment of various immune-related gene sets. Among the immune pathways analysed using ssGSEA, NKT cell differentiation exhibited the strongest association with overall survival (OS). Patients with high NKT enrichment scores (ESs) demonstrated significantly improved OS compared to those with lower scores (median survival: 5.62 vs. 4.68 years, p = 0.015; Figure 1, Table 1). KM analysis of additional immune-related gene sets showed variable survival trends, but none reached statistical significance after multiple testing correction, highlighting the unique prognostic relevance of the NKT cell signature.
In a multivariate discrete-time survival model adjusting for HPV status and smoking, high NKT differentiation remained an independent predictor of improved overall survival (HR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.03–0.49, p = 0.003, Table 2). Neither HPV positivity (HR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.43–4.17, p = 0.612) nor smoking status (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.29–1.66, p = 0.410) were significantly associated with survival. These results confirm that NKT cell differentiation enrichment contributes prognostic value independently of major clinical confounders.

3.2. Clinical Data and NKT Cell Differentiation

High NKT cell differentiation ESs were significantly associated with favourable clinicopathological features. Specifically, patients in the high ES group were more likely to have lower tumour grade (p = 0.0079), earlier clinical stage (p = 0.011), and negative history of alcohol consumption (p = 0.0202) (Figure 2). No statistically significant associations were observed between NKT cell ES and tobacco consumption or p16 status.

3.3. Gene Expression and Methylation

Further analysis of gene expression within the NKT differentiation gene set identified ITK, ATF2, and ZNF683 as potential drivers of the observed prognostic signal. Among these, ITK expression was most strongly correlated with improved overall survival (p < 0.01), suggesting it may play a role in the antitumour immune activity of NKT cells in OPSCC (Figure 3, Table 3).
To explore the potential interactions and functional context of these genes, we utilized the GeneMANIA network analysis tool. The interaction network (Figure 4) revealed that ITK is closely connected to canonical T-cell signalling mediators such as LAT, WAS, and LCP2, indicating its central role in immune signal transduction. Similarly, ATF2 showed strong interaction with numerous histone H2B family members (e.g., H2BC11, H2BC13, H2BC21), confirming epigenetic or transcriptional regulatory roles. ZNF683, while less interconnected, clustered in proximity with ITK and ATF2, supporting its shared involvement in immune regulatory pathways.
These findings suggest that the prognostic signal associated with NKT cell differentiation may be driven, at least in part, by the coordinated activity of transcriptional regulators (ATF2) and TCR-associated proteins (ZNF683, ITK), implicating both epigenetic control and T-cell activation in the modulation of OPSCC progression.
Because of the potential epigenetic changes, we analysed the methylation data from our samples and correlated them with transcriptomic data of our three genes of interest (Figure 5). While CpG sites annotated to ATF2 were overall hypomethylated across oropharyngeal cancer samples (Figure 6), mean methylation levels showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.03, p = 0.007) with gene expression (Figure 7).
To further investigate the role of epigenetics in these specific genes, we analysed methylation profile data from two studies that published their methylation meta-data (GEO access: GSE178219 and GSE98807) [18,19]. When analysing the data from Soares-Lima et al., we found that ITK was hypermethylated compared to normal tissue (p = 0.001) (Figure 8A). ZNF683 promotors were hypomethylated (p = 0.08) and ATF2 promotor methylation scores were similar in both groups (p = 0.07) (Figure 8B, Table 4). We extracted the CpG promotors and their methylation status for the three genes of interest (Figure 8C).
Consistent results were observed in the study by Nakagawa T. et al., where ZNF683 was significantly hypomethylated in the cancer cohort (p = 0.02) (Figure 9A). Their data also showed hypermethylation of ITK promoters in normal tissue (p = 0.09), and no significant difference in ATF2 methylation between the two groups (Table 5). We also visualised methylation status of CpG promotors affecting the expression of the three genes of interest (Figure 9B). We observed that patients with highly methylated genes predominantly had lower NKT ES, which also might indicate an epigenetic regulatory effect (Figure 10).

3.4. Macrophage Activation and Clinical Data

We analysed macrophage activation ES with clinical data. These patients present commonly in higher T, N, and clinical stages. We observed a 1.28-fold-higher changes in the p16+ group (p = 0.0135), implying macrophage activation in HPV+ OPSCC (Figure 11).

3.5. Deconvolution and Interleukin Expression

In order to better understand the immune cell interactions, we performed quanTIseq deconvolution analysis (Figure 12), where we approximated the number of immune cells in our samples. Our study found an overall prevalence of regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg), followed by M1 macrophage and neutrophiles (Figure 13).
To further understand the potential interactions between immune cells, we also performed an analysis of cytokine expression genes in tumours; the most expressed cytokines were TGFβ, IL-18, IL-15, and TNFα (Figure 14A). Since cytokine expression correlated with each other (Figure 14B), we performed principal component analysis (Figure 14F). The first three components explained more than 90% of variance. Principal component 1 (Figure 14C) correlated very strongly with TGFβ, moderately with IL-10 and weakly with TNFα; principal component 2 (Figure 14D) correlated strongly with IL-18 and fairly with IL-4, finally the third principal component (Figure 14E) correlated strongly with IL-15 and moderately with type-I interferons (IFNK and IFNW1). In addition, components 2 and 3 inversely correlated with TGFβ. None of the principal components correlated with survival.

3.6. KEGG Pathway Enrichment and Gene–Pathway Network Analysis

To explore downstream molecular mechanisms associated with NKT-related genes, KEGG enrichment analysis was conducted. The top enriched pathways included MAPK signalling, Th17 cell differentiation, T-cell receptor signalling, Hepatitis B, and Relaxin signalling (Figure 15).
A gene–pathway interaction network (Figure 16) revealed that ATF2 is connected to multiple signalling and metabolic pathways, including MAPK, TNF, and oestrogen signalling, suggesting its integrative role in stress and immune regulation. ITK is clustered with T-cell activation and cytokine-related pathways (chemokine signalling, T-cell receptor signalling), reinforcing its immunologic importance. TGFBR2 was connected to TGF-β and Th17 differentiation pathways, linking NKT activity with immune modulation and tumour suppression.

4. Discussion

Many studies have been carried out researching the tumour immune environment of OPSCC, primarily focusing on CD8+ and CD4+ T cell expression [20]. Other types of lymphocytes have not been as thoroughly studied. One unique population that bridges the innate and adaptive immunity are NKT cells. They are capable of direct cytotoxic activity and rapid cytokine release, playing a key role in immunosurveillance and antitumour response [21,22]. Due to their unique characteristic, NKT cells represent a specialised type of cell bridging innate and adoptive immune systems. Unlike conventional T cells, NKT cells can recognise a wide variety of antigens. Their proposed role in antitumor immunity is linked to their ability to produce IFN-γ, thereby activating NK cells and CD8+ T lymphocytes, as well as inducing IL-12 production in dendritic cells [23]. Even after adjusting for HPV status and smoking, high NKT differentiation remained an independent predictor of improved survival, highlighting its potential as a clinically meaningful biomarker beyond established prognostic factors. Given global increases in HPV-associated OPSCC and the emerging role of immune-based therapies, the findings of this study have broad relevance for biomarker development and personalised immunotherapy across diverse populations [24].
We found that NKT cell differentiation ESs were significantly associated with OS in OPSCC, suggesting that NKT activity plays a critical role in shaping patient outcomes. Supporting this finding, an in vivo study by Dhodapkar MV et al. demonstrated reversible functional defects in NKT cells among patients with progressive multiple myeloma, implicating NKT cells in the regulation of tumour growth [25]. Similarly, Molling JW et al. measured poorer overall survival outcomes among patients diagnosed with HNSCC with lower levels of circulating invariant NKT cells in 47 peripheral blood samples [26]. To our knowledge, no prior study looked at the transcriptomic expression of NKT cells in OPSCC. An immunohistochemical study conducted by Wagner S et al. described an overall better survival for patients that had a positive NK cell infiltration, compared to patients lacking NK cell infiltration [27]. Likewise, Stangl et al., in their study on HNSCC, confirmed that lower numbers of infiltrating NK cells had the highest negative predictive value on OS and disease relapse [28].
Building on these clinical and environmental findings, we described three proteins involved in the process of NKT cell differentiation significantly associated with improved OS in OPSCC: ATF2, ZNF683, and ITK.
ATF2 (Activation transcription factor 2) is a member of the basic region-leucine zipper transcription factor family and regulates numerous genes essential for cellular function. ATF2 has also been described to regulate histone H2B and H4 acetylation, regulating CRE-dependent transcription [29]. The role of ATF2 in cancer progression and outcome is controversial. For instance, Duffey et al. described that decreased expression of ATF2 in patients with HNSCC lead to an in vivo chemo resistance; interestingly, it did not affect tumour growth [30]. This is probably due to ATF2 having a role in DNA repairment. Supporting a tumour-suppressive role, Maekawa et al. demonstrated that a mouse exhibiting a heterozygote loss of Atf2 showed an increased susceptibility for mammary tumours [31]. Contrary to these findings, other studies showed an oncogene potential in solid tumours like pancreatic carcinoma and bladder cancer [32,33]. We observed that ATF2 CpG sites were globally hypomethylated in OPSCC. However, relative increases in methylation were associated with higher ATF2 expression. Since increased ATF2 expression was associated with improved overall survival, these findings suggest that methylation at ATF2 CpG sites may act as a permissive rather than repressive epigenetic mark in OPSCC.
ZNF683 (or Hobit), is a transcription factor involved in the terminal differentiation of NKT cells [34]. Its function, however, is not only restricted to NKT cells. ZNF683 is also a key regulator of tissue-resident memory T cells (Trm), a subset of peripheral CD8+ T lymphocytes that remain localised within tissues rather than recirculating through the bloodstream. Trm cells have been shown to exert potent antitumoral activity [35,36]. Consistent results were observed in the study by Nakagawa T. et al., where ZNF683 was significantly hypomethylated in the cancer cohort. These findings support our results, which suggest that ZNF683 contributes to antitumoral immune responses.
Another protein we found to have a favourable OS is ITK (IL-2-inducible tyrosine kinase), a member of the Tec family of non-receptor tyrosine kinase necessary for T-lymphocyte development, and particularly NKT cells [37]. Various studies have confirmed the role of ITK in oncogenesis, primarily in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In 2019, a case report of two siblings with biallelic ITK mutation and HPV infection resulted in epidermodysplasia verruciformis, a precancerous lesion that can lead to skin squamous cell carcinoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. Both patients exhibited a reduced number of NKT cells in their peripheral blood [38]. Our methylation data analysis of data from Soares-Lima et al. found significant hypermethylation of ITK in cancerous tissue. Similarly, we noticed a trend of hypermethylation of ITK promotor regions in OPSCC in TCGA data. However, data from Nakagawa T. et al. showed a trend towards hypermethylation in normal tissue, although not statistically significant. In contrast to our findings, Carson et al. described hypomethylation of CpG islands within ITK in melanoma, concluding that higher expression of ITK may promote carcinogenesis [39]. Similarly to the data from Nakagawa et al., Zamora-Fuentes et al. found ITK to be hypomethylated in all stages of clear cell renal cancer, classifying ITK as methylation-related oncogene; however, contrary to Carson et al., Zamora-Fuentes’ data shows that the cohort with higher expressions of ITK has a more favourable OS [40]. Furthermore, while our methylation analysis supports epigenetic regulation of ITK, ZNF683, and ATF2, the functional consequences of these modifications remain to be experimentally validated. Importantly, such DNA methylation changes are potentially reversible, which opens avenues for targeted epigenetic modulation. Recent CRISPR-based editing systems, such as catalytically inactive dCas9 fused with TET or DNMT enzymes, allow locus-specific demethylation or methylation of CpG regions [41]. Applying these tools in OPSCC models could help reverse specific epigenetic marks and directly assess their mechanistic and therapeutic impact.
Patients with higher macrophage activation ES had a higher OS and correlated with p16 positivity. In their immunohistochemical study, Tosi et al. noticed a different effect of tumour-associated macrophage dependent on HPV status, where HPV+ cancers had a favourable effect on survival, unlike the HPV cohort [42]. Snietura et al. also found that CD68+ and CD163+ cells were more expressed in tumour, with the CD163+ phenotype exhibiting negative characteristics like lower OS and loco-regional control, especially in HPV-OPSCC [43]. Our deconvolution analysis also highlights the pivotal role macrophages have on the TME. In addition to this, cytokines involved with innate immunity and Treg response seem to be the most expressed ones. Given the heterogeneity of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, where some subtypes display markedly more aggressive behaviour while others have more favourable survival [44], further epigenetic research should be extended to other oropharyngeal and head and neck cancer subtypes to better understand how epigenetic regulation contributes to these clinical differences. Given the predominance of innate immune cells like NK/NKT cells and macrophages, we believe that further research should be focused on their interaction in the TME, and how this communication could be used as a novel therapeutic strategy or for employing therapies that are already used in other types of cancer such as type-I interferons.
The main limitation of our study is the relatively small sample size and its retrospective design. The retrospective nature of the dataset introduces potential bias in patient selection and data completeness. Despite standardised TCGA curation, residual confounding by unmeasured clinical variables cannot be excluded. While ssGSEA enables cell-type-specific pathway quantification at the individual sample level, it cannot distinguish tumour versus stromal cell origin or account for cellular heterogeneity within bulk transcriptomic data. Functional validation through in vitro and in vivo assays will be necessary to confirm the biological role of ITK, ZNF683, and ATF2 in NKT cell differentiation and OPSCC progression. Future functional experiments (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9 knockdown or overexpression assays) are warranted to clarify how these genes interact with immune cell subsets and influence tumour progression.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our results suggest that NKT-related gene expression signatures, particularly ITK, ZNF683, and ATF2, may serve as prognostic biomarkers in OPSCC and could represent novel therapeutic targets. We also concluded that epigenetic regulation is an important mechanism in OPSCC carcinogenesis. Given that epigenetic alterations are reversible, this raises the possibility that pharmacologic reprogramming of immune-related genes could augment antitumour immunity by activating innate cells and improve responses to immunotherapy in OPSCC. However, larger and functionally oriented studies describing these mechanisms are needed to validate these findings and clarify the contributions of NKT cells in OPSCC pathogenesis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, L.M., R.K. and B.B.; methodology, L.M. and B.B.; software, V.C.; validation, B.B. and R.K.; formal analysis, B.B.; investigation, M.L.; resources, M.G.D. and Z.H.; data curation, L.M. and B.B.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.; writing—review and editing, R.K., M.L. and B.B.; visualisation, L.M.; supervision, B.B., R.K. and M.G.D.; project administration, M.L.; funding acquisition, M.L., Z.H. and L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AbbreviationFull Term
AJCCAmerican Joint Committee on Cancer
ANOVAAnalysis of Variance
ATF2Activating Transcription Factor 2
CIConfidence Interval
cloglogComplementary Log-Log
CREcAMP Response Element
GEOGene Expression Omnibus
GOBPGene Ontology Biological Process
H2BHistone 2B
HNCHead and Neck Cancer
HNSCCHead and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
HPVHuman Papillomavirus
HRHazard Ratio
IFNInterferon
ILInterleukin
ITKIL2-Inducible T-cell Kinase
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
KMKaplan–Meier
LATLinker for Activation of T cells
MAPKMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
MHCMajor Histocompatibility Complex
MSigDBMolecular Signatures Database
NKNatural Killer
NKTNatural Killer T (cell)
OPSCCOropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
OSOverall Survival
PCAPrincipal Component Analysis
PD-1Programmed Cell Death Protein 1
PD-L1Programmed Death-Ligand 1
RNA-SeqRNA Sequencing
RSEMRNA-Seq by Expectation-Maximisation
ssGSEASingle-Sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
TCGAThe Cancer Genome Atlas
TCRT-cell Receptor
TGFβTransforming Growth Factor Beta
TGFBR2Transforming Growth Factor Beta Receptor 2
Th17T Helper 17 (cell)
TIMTumour Immune Microenvironment
TMBTumour Mutational Burden
TNFαTumour Necrosis Factor Alpha
TMETumour Microenvironment
TrmTissue-Resident Memory (T cell)
TregRegulatory T cell
WASWiskott–Aldrich Syndrome protein
ZNF683Zinc Finger Protein 683 (Hobit)

References

  1. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 229–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chaturvedi, A.K. Epidemiology and Clinical Aspects of HPV in Head and Neck Cancers. Head Neck Pathol. 2012, 6, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maschio, F.; Lejuste, P.; Ilankovan, V. Evolution in the Management of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review of Outcomes over the Last 25 Years. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 57, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chaturvedi, A.K.; Engels, E.A.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Hernandez, B.Y.; Xiao, W.; Kim, E.; Jiang, B.; Goodman, M.T.; Sibug-Saber, M.; Cozen, W.; et al. Human Papillomavirus and Rising Oropharyngeal Cancer Incidence in the United States. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 4294–4301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maluf, F.V.; Andricopulo, A.D.; Oliva, G.; Guido, R.V. A Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening Approach for the Discovery of Trypanosoma cruzi GAPDH Inhibitors. Future Med. Chem. 2013, 5, 2019–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amin, M.B.; Greene, F.L.; Edge, S.B.; Compton, C.C.; Gershenwald, J.E.; Brookland, R.K.; Meyer, L.; Gress, D.M.; Byrd, D.R.; Winchester, D.P. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to Build a Bridge from a Population-based to a More “Personalized” Approach to Cancer Staging. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pardoll, D.M. The Blockade of Immune Checkpoints in Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gillison, M.L.; Blumenschein, G.; Fayette, J.; Guigay, J.; Colevas, A.D.; Licitra, L.; Harrington, K.J.; Kasper, S.; Vokes, E.E.; Even, C.; et al. CheckMate 141: 1-Year Update and Subgroup Analysis of Nivolumab as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer. Oncologist 2018, 23, 1079–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Seiwert, T.Y.; Burtness, B.; Mehra, R.; Weiss, J.; Berger, R.; Eder, J.P.; Heath, K.; McClanahan, T.; Lunceford, J.; Gause, C.; et al. Safety and Clinical Activity of Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (KEYNOTE-012): An Open-Label, Multicentre, Phase 1b Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016, 17, 956–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cohen, E.E.W.; Le Tourneau, C.; Licitra, L.; Ahn, M.-J.; Soria, A.; Machiels, J.-P.; Mach, N.; Mehra, R.; Burtness, B.; Zhang, P.; et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2019, 393, 156–167, Erratum in Lancet 2019, 393, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33261-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cristescu, R.; Mogg, R.; Ayers, M.; Albright, A.; Murphy, E.; Yearley, J.; Sher, X.; Liu, X.Q.; Lu, H.; Nebozhyn, M.; et al. Pan-tumor genomic biomarkers for PD-1 checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapy. Science 2018, 362, eaar3593, Erratum in Science 2019, 363, eaax1384. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Reeves, E.; Wood, O.; Ottensmeier, C.; King, E.; Thomas, G.; Elliott, T.; James, E. Differences in ERAP1 Allo-type Function Correlate with HPV Epitope Processing and Level of Tumour Infiltration with CD8+ T Cells in HPV-Positive OPSCC. Mol. Immunol. 2022, 150, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ayers, M.; Lunceford, J.; Nebozhyn, M.; Murphy, E.; Loboda, A.; Kaufman, D.R.; Albright, A.; Cheng, J.D.; Kang, S.P.; Shankaran, V.; et al. IFN-γ-Related MRNA Profile Predicts Clinical Response to PD-1 Blockade. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 2930–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gong, W.; Kuang, M.; Chen, H.; Luo, Y.; You, K.; Zhang, B.; Liu, Y. Single-Sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis Reveals the Clinical Implications of Immune-Related Genes in Ovarian Cancer. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2024, 11, 1426274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, S.; Lv, X.; Li, Y.; Gao, X.; Ma, Z.; Fu, X.; Li, Y. Integrated Machine Learning and Single-Sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis Identifies a TGF-Beta Signaling Pathway Derived Score in Headneck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Oncol. 2022, 2022, 3140263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barbie, D.A.; Tamayo, P.; Boehm, J.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Moody, S.E.; Dunn, I.F.; Schinzel, A.C.; Sandy, P.; Meylan, E.; Scholl, C.; et al. Systematic RNA Interference Reveals That Oncogenic KRAS-Driven Cancers Require TBK1. Nature 2009, 462, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chan, Y.H. Biostatistics 104: Correlational Analysis. Singap. Med. J. 2003, 44, 614–619. [Google Scholar]
  18. Soares-Lima, S.C.; Mehanna, H.; Camuzi, D.; de Souza-Santos, P.T.; de Simão, T.A.; Nicolau-Neto, P.; de Al-meida Lopes, M.S.; Cuenin, C.; Talukdar, F.R.; Batis, N.; et al. Upper Aerodigestive Tract Squamous Cell Carcinomas Show Distinct Overall DNA Methylation Profiles and Different Molecular Mechanisms behind WNT Signaling Disruption. Cancers 2021, 13, 3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nakagawa, T.; Matsusaka, K.; Misawa, K.; Ota, S.; Takane, K.; Fukuyo, M.; Rahmutulla, B.; Shinohara, K.I.; Kunii, N.; Sakurai, D.; et al. Frequent Promoter Hypermethylation Associated with Human Papillomavirus Infection in Pharyngeal Cancer. Cancer Lett. 2017, 407, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lechien, J.R.; Seminerio, I.; Descamps, G.; Mat, Q.; Mouawad, F.; Hans, S.; Julieron, M.; Dequanter, D.; Vanderhaegen, T.; Journe, F.; et al. Impact of HPV Infection on the Immune System in Oropharyngeal and Non-Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Cells 2019, 8, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, M.; Arooj, S.; Wang, H. NK Cell-Based Immune Checkpoint Inhibition. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Courtney, A.N.; Tian, G.; Metelitsa, L.S. Natural Killer T Cells and Other Innate-like T Lymphocytes as Emerging Platforms for Allogeneic Cancer Cell Therapy. Blood 2023, 141, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Terabe, M.; Berzofsky, J.A. The Role of NKT Cells in Tumor Immunity. Adv. Cancer Res. 2008, 101, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zumsteg, Z.S.; Luu, M.; Rosenberg, P.S.; Elrod, J.K.; Bray, F.; Vaccarella, S.; Gay, C.; Lu, D.J.; Chen, M.M.; Chaturvedi, A.K.; et al. Global Epidemiologic Patterns of Oropharyngeal Cancer Incidence Trends. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2023, 115, 1544–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dhodapkar, M.V.; Geller, M.D.; Chang, D.H.; Shimizu, K.; Fujii, S.I.; Dhodapkar, K.M.; Krasovsky, J. A Reversible Defect in Natural Killer T Cell Function Characterizes the Progression of Premalignant to Malignant Multiple Myeloma. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 1667–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Molling, J.W.; Langius, J.A.E.; Langendijk, J.A.; Leemans, C.R.; Bontkes, H.J.; Van Der Vliet, H.J.J.; Von Blomberg, B.M.E.; Scheper, R.J.; Van Den Eertwegh, A.J.M. Low Levels of Circulating Invariant Natural Killer T Cells Predict Poor Clinical Outcome in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wagner, S.; Wittekindt, C.; Reuschenbach, M.; Hennig, B.; Thevarajah, M.; Würdemann, N.; Prigge, E.S.; Von Knebel Doeberitz, M.; Dreyer, T.; Gattenlöhner, S.; et al. CD56-Positive Lymphocyte Infiltration in Relation to Human Papillomavirus Association and Prognostic Significance in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 138, 2263–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stangl, S.; Tontcheva, N.; Sievert, W.; Shevtsov, M.; Niu, M.; Schmid, T.E.; Pigorsch, S.; Combs, S.E.; Haller, B.; Balermpas, P.; et al. Heat Shock Protein 70 and Tumor-infiltrating NK Cells as Prognostic Indicators for Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck after Radiochemotherapy: A Multicentre Retrospective Study of the German Cancer Consortium Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG). Int. J. Cancer 2017, 142, 1911–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kawasaki, H.; Schiltz, L.; Chiu, R.; Itakura, K.; Taira, K.; Nakatani, Y.; Yokoyama, K.K. ATF-2 Has Intrinsic Histone Acetyltransferase Activity Which Is Modulated by Phosphorylation. Nature 2000, 405, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Duffey, D.; Dolgilevich, S.; Razzouk, S.; Li, L.; Green, R.; Gorti, G.K. Activating Transcription Factor-2 (ATF2) in Survival Mechanisms in Head and Neck Carcinoma Cells. Head Neck 2010, 33, 1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  31. Maekawa, T.; Shinagawa, T.; Sano, Y.; Sakuma, T.; Nomura, S.; Nagasaki, K.; Miki, Y.; Saito-Ohara, F.; Inazawa, J.; Kohno, T.; et al. Reduced Levels of ATF-2 Predispose Mice to Mammary Tumors. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 27, 1730–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, M.; Wu, X.; Liu, N.; Li, X.; Meng, F.; Song, S. Silencing of ATF2 Inhibits Growth of Pancreatic Cancer Cells and Enhances Sensitivity to Chemotherapy. Cell Biol. Int. 2017, 41, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Inoue, S.; Mizushima, T.; Ide, H.; Jiang, G.; Goto, T.; Nagata, Y.; Netto, G.J.; Miyamoto, H. ATF2 Promotes Urothelial Cancer Outgrowth via Cooperation with Androgen Receptor Signaling. Endocr. Connect. 2018, 7, 1397–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Van Gisbergen, K.P.J.M.; Kragten, N.A.M.; Hertoghs, K.M.L.; Wensveen, F.M.; Jonjic, S.; Hamann, J.; Nolte, M.A.; Van Lier, R.A.W. Mouse Hobit Is a Homolog of the Transcriptional Repressor Blimp-1 That Regulates NKT Cell Effector Differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 864–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Craig, D.J.; Creeden, J.F.; Einloth, K.R.; Gillman, C.E.; Stanbery, L.; Hamouda, D.; Edelman, G.; Dworkin, L.; Nemunaitis, J.J. Resident Memory T Cells and Their Effect on Cancer. Vaccines 2020, 8, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rosner, S.; Connor, S.; Sanber, K.; Zahurak, M.; Zhang, T.; Gurumurthy, I.; Zeng, Z.; Presson, B.; Singh, D.; Rayes, R.; et al. Divergent Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Based on STK11 Co-Mutation Status in Resectable KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancers Following Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Clin. Cancer Res. 2024, 31, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lechner, K.S.; Neurath, M.F.; Weigmann, B. Role of the IL-2 Inducible Tyrosine Kinase ITK and Its Inhibitors in Disease Pathogenesis. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 98, 1385–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Youssefian, L.; Vahidnezhad, H.; Yousefi, M.; Saeidian, A.H.; Azizpour, A.; Touati, A.; Nikbakht, N.; Hesari, K.K.; Adib-Sereshki, M.M.; Zeinali, S.; et al. Inherited Interleukin 2–Inducible T-Cell (ITK) Kinase Deficiency in Siblings with Epidermodysplasia Verruciformis and Hodgkin Lymphoma. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 1938–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carson, C.C.; Moschos, S.J.; Edmiston, S.N.; Darr, D.B.; Nikolaishvili-Feinberg, N.; Groben, P.A.; Zhou, X.; Kuan, P.F.; Pandey, S.; Chan, K.T.; et al. IL-2 Inducible T-Cell Kinase, a Novel Therapeutic Target in Melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 2167–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zamora-Fuentes, J.M.; Hernández-Lemus, E.; Espinal-Enríquez, J. Methylation-Related Genes Involved in Renal Carcinoma Progression. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1225158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Josipović, G.; Tadić, V.; Klasić, M.; Zanki, V.; Bečeheli, I.; Chung, F.; Ghantous, A.; Keser, T.; Madunić, J.; Bošković, M.; et al. Antagonistic and Synergistic Epigenetic Modulation Using Orthologous CRISPR/DCas9-Based Modular System. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 9637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tosi, A.; Parisatto, B.; Menegaldo, A.; Spinato, G.; Guido, M.; Del Mistro, A.; Bussani, R.; Zanconati, F.; Tofan-Elli, M.; Tirelli, G.; et al. The Immune Microenvironment of HPV-Positive and HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multiparametric Quantitative and Spatial Analysis Unveils a Rationale to Target Treatment-Naïve Tumors with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Snietura, M.; Brewczynski, A.; Kopec, A.; Rutkowski, T. Infiltrates of M2-like Tumour-Associated Macrophages Are Adverse Prognostic Factor in Patients with Human Papillomavirus-Negative but Not in Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Pathobiology 2020, 87, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Moga, M.; Dumitru, M.; Taciuc, I.A.; Musat, G.; Vrinceanu, D.; Georgescu, S.R.; Costache, A.; Costache, D.O.; Anton, A.Z.C. Five-Year Analysis of Head and Neck Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Incidence, Demographics, and Site Distribution in a Tertiary Care Center. Rom. J. Mil. Med. 2025, 128, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of NKT cell differentiation gene set enrichment and patient OS.
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of NKT cell differentiation gene set enrichment and patient OS.
Cancers 17 03666 g001
Figure 2. Association of NKT cell differentiation ES with clinicopathological features in OPSCC. Indicidual patients’ scores are represented as dots. Patients with no alcohol history demonstrated significantly higher NKT cell differentiation ES compared to those with alcohol use. Similarly, earlier clinical stage and grade was associated with increased NKT differentiation. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Dots represent individual patients.
Figure 2. Association of NKT cell differentiation ES with clinicopathological features in OPSCC. Indicidual patients’ scores are represented as dots. Patients with no alcohol history demonstrated significantly higher NKT cell differentiation ES compared to those with alcohol use. Similarly, earlier clinical stage and grade was associated with increased NKT differentiation. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Dots represent individual patients.
Cancers 17 03666 g002
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of candidate genes within the NKT cell differentiation signature in OPSCC. Overall survival was compared between patients with low versus high median expression of AP3B1, AP3D1, ATF2, ITK, PRDM1, TGFBR2, TOX, ZBTB7B, and ZNF683. Among these, ITK, ZNF683, and ATF2 expression were significantly associated with improved overall survival. Other genes in the signature did not demonstrate statistically significant associations. High-risk and low-risk groups were stratified by median expression. Survival differences were assessed using the log-rank test.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of candidate genes within the NKT cell differentiation signature in OPSCC. Overall survival was compared between patients with low versus high median expression of AP3B1, AP3D1, ATF2, ITK, PRDM1, TGFBR2, TOX, ZBTB7B, and ZNF683. Among these, ITK, ZNF683, and ATF2 expression were significantly associated with improved overall survival. Other genes in the signature did not demonstrate statistically significant associations. High-risk and low-risk groups were stratified by median expression. Survival differences were assessed using the log-rank test.
Cancers 17 03666 g003
Figure 4. Gene–gene interaction network of NKT cell differentiation-associated prognostic genes in OPSCC. The red color indicates physical interactions, purple indicates co-expression, blue for pathway interactions and brown for shared protein domains.
Figure 4. Gene–gene interaction network of NKT cell differentiation-associated prognostic genes in OPSCC. The red color indicates physical interactions, purple indicates co-expression, blue for pathway interactions and brown for shared protein domains.
Cancers 17 03666 g004
Figure 5. Heatmap of NKT cell differentiation gene set expression in OPSCC. The heatmap illustrates Z-scores of genes within the NKT cell differentiation signature across the OPSCC cohort. Rows represent individual genes, while columns correspond to patient samples.
Figure 5. Heatmap of NKT cell differentiation gene set expression in OPSCC. The heatmap illustrates Z-scores of genes within the NKT cell differentiation signature across the OPSCC cohort. Rows represent individual genes, while columns correspond to patient samples.
Cancers 17 03666 g005
Figure 6. Heatmap presenting significant CpG methylation profiles of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC from TCGA. Here we can see an overall hypomethylation for the ATF2 gene, strong hypermethylation of ZNF683, and intermediate methylation for ITK.
Figure 6. Heatmap presenting significant CpG methylation profiles of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC from TCGA. Here we can see an overall hypomethylation for the ATF2 gene, strong hypermethylation of ZNF683, and intermediate methylation for ITK.
Cancers 17 03666 g006
Figure 7. Correlation between mean CpG methylation and gene expression of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC.
Figure 7. Correlation between mean CpG methylation and gene expression of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC.
Cancers 17 03666 g007
Figure 8. Analysis of data collected from Soares-Lima et al. (A) Differential DNA methylation of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC versus normal tissue. Boxplots depict mean beta values (DNA methylation levels) for ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in normal versus tumour samples. (B) Heatmap of DNA methylation patterns in ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 across OPSCC and normal tissue. (C) Heatmap of CpG methylation β-values in ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 loci in OPSCC tumour and mucosa samples [18].
Figure 8. Analysis of data collected from Soares-Lima et al. (A) Differential DNA methylation of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC versus normal tissue. Boxplots depict mean beta values (DNA methylation levels) for ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in normal versus tumour samples. (B) Heatmap of DNA methylation patterns in ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 across OPSCC and normal tissue. (C) Heatmap of CpG methylation β-values in ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 loci in OPSCC tumour and mucosa samples [18].
Cancers 17 03666 g008
Figure 9. Data analysis from Nakagawa et al. (A) Comparison of DNA methylation β-values for ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in normal mucosa versus OPSCC tumour tissue. (B) Heatmap of CpG methylation β-values in ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 loci in OPSCC tumour and mucosa samples [19].
Figure 9. Data analysis from Nakagawa et al. (A) Comparison of DNA methylation β-values for ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in normal mucosa versus OPSCC tumour tissue. (B) Heatmap of CpG methylation β-values in ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 loci in OPSCC tumour and mucosa samples [19].
Cancers 17 03666 g009
Figure 10. Sankey plots showing the distribution of patients based on low and high gene methylation distribution of selected genes, NKT differentiation ES scores, and survival status. ITK (A), ZNF683 (B) and ATF2 (C), all showed that higher methylation groups had a lower NKT ES, suggesting that methylation has a negative effect expression of these genes.
Figure 10. Sankey plots showing the distribution of patients based on low and high gene methylation distribution of selected genes, NKT differentiation ES scores, and survival status. ITK (A), ZNF683 (B) and ATF2 (C), all showed that higher methylation groups had a lower NKT ES, suggesting that methylation has a negative effect expression of these genes.
Cancers 17 03666 g010
Figure 11. The figure shows macrophage activation enrichment scores (expressed as fold change) across several clinical and pathological factors in the patient cohort.
Figure 11. The figure shows macrophage activation enrichment scores (expressed as fold change) across several clinical and pathological factors in the patient cohort.
Cancers 17 03666 g011
Figure 12. Deconvolution analysis of TCGA samples: (A) Bar plot showing estimated proportions of immune cell subsets across OPSCC samples based on quanTIseq deconvolution. Each stacked bar represents an individual tumour, with colours indicating different immune cell types; (B) individual immune cell fractions presented for every sample.
Figure 12. Deconvolution analysis of TCGA samples: (A) Bar plot showing estimated proportions of immune cell subsets across OPSCC samples based on quanTIseq deconvolution. Each stacked bar represents an individual tumour, with colours indicating different immune cell types; (B) individual immune cell fractions presented for every sample.
Cancers 17 03666 g012
Figure 13. Bar plot summarising the mean estimated proportions (±SD) of immune cell subsets from quanTIseq analysis. T regulatory cells (Tregs), M1 macrophages, and neutrophils represent the predominant immune populations within OPSCC tumours.
Figure 13. Bar plot summarising the mean estimated proportions (±SD) of immune cell subsets from quanTIseq analysis. T regulatory cells (Tregs), M1 macrophages, and neutrophils represent the predominant immune populations within OPSCC tumours.
Cancers 17 03666 g013
Figure 14. Gene expression for cytokines. (A) IL-15, IL-18, TNFα, TGFβ showed highest expression in OPSCC. * Stands for extreme outliers (values that fall outside 3× the interquartile range), while empty circles stand for mild outliers (values that fall outside 1.5× the interquartile range). (B) Correlation matrix of the cytokines, higher correlation is marked by blue, while lower is marked with red. The correlations that showed statistical significance are marked grey. (C) Principal component 1 (PC1) showed a strong correlation with TGFβ, highlighting the immunosuppressive nature of this group. (D) Principal component 2 (PC2) correlated highly with IL-18, suggesting innate activity. (E) Principal component 3 (PC3) showed highest correlation with IL-15. (F) The first three components explain more than 90% of variances, with a dominance of PC1. The steep decline after PC3 (elbow point) suggests that these three components capture the major biological variability in cytokine expression.
Figure 14. Gene expression for cytokines. (A) IL-15, IL-18, TNFα, TGFβ showed highest expression in OPSCC. * Stands for extreme outliers (values that fall outside 3× the interquartile range), while empty circles stand for mild outliers (values that fall outside 1.5× the interquartile range). (B) Correlation matrix of the cytokines, higher correlation is marked by blue, while lower is marked with red. The correlations that showed statistical significance are marked grey. (C) Principal component 1 (PC1) showed a strong correlation with TGFβ, highlighting the immunosuppressive nature of this group. (D) Principal component 2 (PC2) correlated highly with IL-18, suggesting innate activity. (E) Principal component 3 (PC3) showed highest correlation with IL-15. (F) The first three components explain more than 90% of variances, with a dominance of PC1. The steep decline after PC3 (elbow point) suggests that these three components capture the major biological variability in cytokine expression.
Cancers 17 03666 g014
Figure 15. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of genes associated with NKT cell differentiation in OPSCC. The X-axis represents the gene ratio, while bubble size indicates gene count and colour denotes adjusted p value.
Figure 15. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of genes associated with NKT cell differentiation in OPSCC. The X-axis represents the gene ratio, while bubble size indicates gene count and colour denotes adjusted p value.
Cancers 17 03666 g015
Figure 16. Gene–pathway interaction network displaying key NKT-associated genes (ITK, ATF2, TGFBR2, AP3B1, and AP3D1) and their enriched KEGG pathways. Blue nodes represent genes, and red nodes represent pathways.
Figure 16. Gene–pathway interaction network displaying key NKT-associated genes (ITK, ATF2, TGFBR2, AP3B1, and AP3D1) and their enriched KEGG pathways. Blue nodes represent genes, and red nodes represent pathways.
Cancers 17 03666 g016
Table 1. A detailed table showing precise gene sets used in this study with their respectful medians. Log-rank tests were used to calculate p value, and Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon test was used to calculate corrected p value.
Table 1. A detailed table showing precise gene sets used in this study with their respectful medians. Log-rank tests were used to calculate p value, and Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon test was used to calculate corrected p value.
Gene Set NameLow Expression (OS Median)High Expression (OS Median)Difference in OS Medianp (Log-Rank)
mo. y. mo. y. mo. y.
GOBP_NK_T_CELL_DIFFERENTIATION142.311.86171.114.2628.82.400.015
GOBP_MACROPHAGE_ACTIVATION_INVOLVED_IN_IMMUNE_RESPONSE56.94.74Undefined 0.0637
GOBP_NEUTROPHIL_ACTIVATION_INVOLVED_IN_IMMUNE_RESPONSE117.59.79144.712.0627.22.270.1078
GOBP_NEGATIVE_REGULATION_OF_ALPHA_BETA_T_CELL_DIFFERENTIATION117.59.79144.712.0627.22.270.1199
GOBP_NEGATIVE_REGULATION_OF_CD4_POSITIVE_ALPHA_BETA_T_CELL_DIFFERENTIATION143.611.97144.712.061.10.090.1347
GOBP_REGULATION_OF_NEUTROPHIL_MEDIATED_CYTOTOXICITY171.114.26117.59.79−53.6−4.470.1363
GOBP_NEGATIVE_REGULATION_OF_CD4_POSITIVE_ALPHA_BETA_T_CELL_ACTIVATION143.611.97144.712.061.10.090.1408
GOBP_NATURAL_KILLER_CELL_ACTIVATION_INVOLVED_IN_IMMUNE_RESPONSE143.611.97144.712.061.10.090.2272
GOBP_REGULATION_OF_NATURAL_KILLER_CELL_MEDIATED_IMMUNE_RESPONSE_TO_TUMOR_CELL117.59.79144.712.0627.22.270.2787
GOBP_NEGATIVE_REGULATION_OF_REGULATORY_T_CELL_DIFFERENTIATION143.611.97144.712.061.10.090.2955
GOBP_NEGATIVE_REGULATION_OF_ALPHA_BETA_T_CELL_ACTIVATION143.611.97144.712.061.10.090.3196
GOBP_NK_T_CELL_PROLIFERATION117.59.79144.712.0627.22.270.3261
GOBP_REGULATORY_T_CELL_DIFFERENTIATION143.611.97144.712.061.10.090.3296
GOBP_NEGATIVE_REGULATION_OF_CD4_POSITIVE_ALPHA_BETA_T_CELL_PROLIFERATION143.611.97144.712.061.10.090.3788
GOBP_NEGATIVE_REGULATION_OF_ALPHA_BETA_T_CELL_PROLIFERATION143.611.97144.712.061.10.090.397
GOBP_NEGATIVE_REGULATION_OF_CD8_POSITIVE_ALPHA_BETA_T_CELL_ACTIVATION142.311.86144.712.062.40.200.541
GOBP_NK_T_CELL_ACTIVATION142.311.86144.712.062.40.200.7386
Table 2. Bias-reduced discrete-time survival model using a complementary log-log (cloglog) link.
Table 2. Bias-reduced discrete-time survival model using a complementary log-log (cloglog) link.
Discrete-Time Survival (Cloglog)
Bias-reduced hazard ratios (Firth-like)
VariableHR (95% CI)p
Intercept0.02 (0.00–0.47)0.014
NKT High vs. Low0.13 (0.03–0.49)0.003
HPV Positive vs. Negative1.34 (0.43–4.17)0.612
Smoking Yes vs. No0.69 (0.29–1.66)0.41
Table 3. Survival associations of candidate genes within the NKT cell differentiation signature in OPSCC.
Table 3. Survival associations of candidate genes within the NKT cell differentiation signature in OPSCC.
Gene NameLow MedianHigh Medianp (Log-Rank)
ITK93.13171.10.0001
ZNF683143.6144.70.0188
ATF2142.3171.10.0336
TGFBR2144.7143.60.0959
PRDM1142.3144.70.1599
TOX142.3171.10.3135
AP3B1144.7143.60.535
AP3D1144.7143.60.7805
ZBTB7B171.1142.30.9916
Table 4. Differential methylation analysis of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC.
Table 4. Differential methylation analysis of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC.
GeneMean M NormalMean M TumourDelta MFold Changet Statp Value
ITK−0.83−0.28592560.551.463.250.003
ZNF6830.960.84−0.110.93−1.150.26
ATF2−2.47−2.460.011.0040.090.93
Table 5. Differential methylation analysis of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC tumour tissue versus normal mucosa [19].
Table 5. Differential methylation analysis of ATF2, ITK, and ZNF683 in OPSCC tumour tissue versus normal mucosa [19].
GeneMean M MucosaMean M CancerDelta MFold Changet Statp Value
ZNF6830.660.17−0.490.71−2.800.02
ITK0.33−0.27−0.590.66−1.970.09
ATF2−3.79−3.600.191.140.410.71
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Minarik, L.; Khoueiry, R.; Leskur, M.; Cahais, V.; Herceg, Z.; Glavina Durdov, M.; Benzon, B. Epigenetic Regulation of NKT-Cell-Related Gene Signatures and Prognostic Implications in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers 2025, 17, 3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223666

AMA Style

Minarik L, Khoueiry R, Leskur M, Cahais V, Herceg Z, Glavina Durdov M, Benzon B. Epigenetic Regulation of NKT-Cell-Related Gene Signatures and Prognostic Implications in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers. 2025; 17(22):3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223666

Chicago/Turabian Style

Minarik, Luka, Rita Khoueiry, Mirela Leskur, Vincent Cahais, Zdenko Herceg, Merica Glavina Durdov, and Benjamin Benzon. 2025. "Epigenetic Regulation of NKT-Cell-Related Gene Signatures and Prognostic Implications in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma" Cancers 17, no. 22: 3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223666

APA Style

Minarik, L., Khoueiry, R., Leskur, M., Cahais, V., Herceg, Z., Glavina Durdov, M., & Benzon, B. (2025). Epigenetic Regulation of NKT-Cell-Related Gene Signatures and Prognostic Implications in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers, 17(22), 3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223666

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop