Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
CancersCancers
  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

24 September 2025

Colorectal Cancer Risk Following Cholecystectomy: An Updated Systematic Review

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel and Europe Hospitals, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy

Simple Summary

Cholecystectomy, or gallbladder removal surgery, is commonly performed to treat gallstones. While concerns have been raised about its potential link to colon cancer, past studies offer mixed findings. This updated systematic review incorporates recent observational cohort studies to further examine the association. Overall, no significant increase in colon cancer risk was observed; however, some evidence suggests a possible elevated risk for right-sided colon cancer. To better understand this potential link, large population-based studies using national databases are needed. These could help guide follow-up care and inform screening strategies for patients after gallbladder removal.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cholecystectomy (CE) is among the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. While it effectively treats gallstone disease, concerns have been raised about a potential long-term association with colorectal cancer (CRC), given overlapping risk factors and post-surgical physiological changes. Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings. This updated systematic review aimed to reassess the association between CE and CRC risk by incorporating the most recent evidence. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published after May 2022. Eligible studies were observational cohort studies reporting relative risk estimates for CRC following CE. Data were extracted manually, and study quality was assessed using the NewcastleOttawa Scale (NOS). Only high-quality studies were included to update the systematic review. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: Out of 156 identified records, three new high-quality cohort studies met the inclusion criteria and were added to the 18 studies from the previous review, resulting in a total of 21 studies. The findings were heterogeneous: while no consistent association with overall CRC risk was observed, several studies reported an elevated risk of proximal (right-sided) colon cancer following CE. Egger’s test indicated no significant publication bias (p = 0.50). Conclusions: This updated systematic review suggests a potential association between CE and an increased risk of proximal colon cancer; however, the evidence remains inconclusive. Further prospective studies with robust confounder control and detailed tumor location-specific analyses are warranted to clarify causality and guide future screening strategies.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.