Next Article in Journal
Impact of Bone Metastases and Actionable Genetic Alterations in Biliary Tract Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
CRISPR/Cas9 Screening Highlights PFKFB3 Gene as a Major Contributor to 5-Fluorouracil Resistance in Esophageal Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 17
Issue 10
10.3390/cancers17101638
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Immune Evasion in Cancer Metastasis: An Unappreciated Role of Monocytes

by
Marina R. Patysheva
1,*,
Anastasya A. Fedorenko
1,
Anna A. Khozyainova
1,
Evgeny V. Denisov
1,2 and
Tatiana S. Gerashchenko
1,2
1
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kooperativny Str. 5, Tomsk 634009, Russia
2
Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Str. 6, Moscow 115093, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2025, 17(10), 1638; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101638
Submission received: 3 April 2025 / Revised: 2 May 2025 / Accepted: 10 May 2025 / Published: 12 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Stem Cells: The Origin of Tumor Relapse and Metastasis)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Monocytes are important components of the immune system and critical regulators of cancer progression. Whereas monocyte participation in cancer development and response to therapy has been described extensively, their impact on metastasis remains underdiscussed. This review summarizes data concerning the influence of monocytes on metastasis formation during their presence in the circulation, primary tumor, and pre-metastatic niche, and highlights insights into the clinical relevance of targeting monocytes in metastasis prevention.

Abstract

Metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. During the metastatic cascade, cancer cells tightly interact with immune cells influencing each other in the tumor microenvironment and systemically. Monocytes are important components of immune evasion and critical regulators of cancer progression. They circulate through the bloodstream and contribute to the formation of a pro-tumor microenvironment both in the tumor and pre-metastatic niche. Whereas monocyte participation in cancer development and response to therapy has been described extensively, its impact on metastasis remains a completely uncovered area. This review first summarizes data concerning the influence of monocytes on metastasis formation during their presence in the circulation, primary tumor, and pre-metastatic niche. We also highlight the latest examinations into the clinical relevance of targeting monocytes to prevent metastasis.

1. Introduction

Metastasis is a multistep process of cancer progression that includes tumor invasion, intravasation, the circulation of tumor cells in lymph or peripheral blood, extravasation to the area of pre-metastatic niches, and, finally, colonization [1,2]. The immune system is a major player at all stages of metastasis development [3].
Monocytes are circulating immune cells, which are involved in oncogenesis as precursors to tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and dendritic cells [4,5]. Additionally, monocytes play a patrolling role while in the bloodstream [6]. As immature patrolling cells, monocytes can adapt to clearing cellular debris and aid in reducing inflammation [6]. To date, it is clear that monocytes produce a variety of factors that affect the cells surrounding them, including tumor, stromal, and immune cells. Yet, the exact nature of this influence is largely unexplored.
Some of the immune cell populations are known to inhibit cancer progression, whereas others can support it. The current understanding of the role of the immune system in cancer progression is that the balance between the pro- and antitumor activity of immune cells plays a crucial role in the development of recurrence and metastases [7,8,9]. Monocytes and the cells they differentiate into can take on both these contrasting roles within the immune response. This dual function of monocytes arises from their ability to change their form and behavior depending on the surrounding context and environment [4,5]. In some contexts, these cells promote tumor growth via immune evasion; in others, they actively identify and kill tumor cells. However, our current understanding of the factors that drive these different contexts remains extremely limited.
In this review, we highlight evidence indicating that the functional state of monocytes plays a critical role in the metastatic progression of cancer. Insights from studies pointing to the contributions of monocytes to tumor cell survival and spread suggest that monocytes are important in the development of metastases from the bloodstream. The existing knowledge and further mechanistic studies could help identify monocytes and their functions as a new avenue for anti-metastatic therapy.

2. Formation and Characteristics of Monocytes

Monocytes are white blood cells developing from myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow in response to circulating factors [4,5,10]. It has also been reported that a population of bona fide undifferentiated monocytes can reside in the spleen [11,12,13,14]. Splenic monocytes and bone marrow monocytes possibly exhibit different functional profiles [15,16,17,18]. However, whether and how monocytes that enter the blood from the bone marrow differ from those that originate in the spleen has not been well studied, and this question remains to be explored. The lifespan of monocytes in peripheral blood is 1–7 days [19]. While circulating in the blood, monocytes can patrol the endothelial wall and phagocytize, and maintain the integrity of the endothelium [13].
Like other immune cell populations found in the blood, the monocyte population is heterogeneous. There are three major subsets of monocytes that have been formally identified by the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Immunological Societies [20]. In humans, this classification distinguishes classical (CD14++16−), intermediate (CD14+16+), and non-classical (CD14lowCD16+) monocytes based on the expression of the lipopolysaccharide receptor CD14 and FcγRIII/CD16 [20,21]. However, since CD14 is expressed on all monocytes, and CD16 is found in both non-classical and intermediate populations, clearly defining the criteria for distinguishing these populations is challenging. Murine models are often used to investigate the role of monocytes in the development of metastasis. However, it should be kept in mind that there are some important differences between mice and humans where monocyte nomenclature and markers are concerned. For mouse blood monocytes, a subdivision into three subsets similar to humans is proposed, that is, classical, intermediate, and nonclassical [20]. The classical monocytes show high Ly6C expression (Ly6C++), the intermediate monocytes show a high level of Ly6C (Ly6C+), and the nonclassical monocytes express a low level of Ly6C (Ly6Clow) [20].
Various studies have suggested adding other markers to the conventional panel to improve the definition and homogeneity of monocyte subsets. Based on protein marker detection, monocytes can be divided into different populations depending on the expression of receptors involved in cell maturation, adhesion, migration, and invasion, including CD62L, CCR2, CCR5, CXCR1, CXCR3, CXCR4, or inflammation-related CD64 (Fcγ receptor I), CD163, CD80, CD86, and others [22,23,24]. The study of immune populations down to single cells is now possible thanks to recent methodological advancements such as single-cell sequencing or an application of mass cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF). Since the introduction of these methods, various research groups began to distinguish new populations of monocytes in health and disease [25,26,27,28,29,30]. These single-cell studies have revealed discrepancies in defining the distribution of CD14++16−, CD14+16+, and CD14lowCD16+ monocyte subsets. Presumably, once sufficient data have accumulated, monocyte nomenclature will be updated.
The main function of monocytes is to supply key components of the immune system, such as macrophages and dendritic cells. This is where they make a significant impact on shaping innate and adaptive immune responses. According to the classical theory of R. van Furth, it was previously believed that macrophages and dendritic cells, including those in the tumor microenvironment, originate from the bone marrow and are formed during the migration of their precursors—monocytes—to peripheral organs [31]. It is now understood that, except for intestinal macrophages, most resident macrophages in peripheral organs and tissues originate from the embryonic yolk sac [32,33]. Under healthy conditions, the macrophage pool is composed of resident cells and replenished by monocytes [34]. In pathological conditions, circulating monocytes become the main source for replenishing the population of tissue macrophages and immature or tolerogenic dendritic cells, that lead to suppressing the immune response, facilitating tumor progression and metastasis [35]. From the blood, monocytes migrate to sites of acute or chronic inflammation following a chemokine gradient [10,36,37,38]. The main chemokine associated with monocyte trafficking into tissues is CCL2, also known as monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), along with CCL5 and CCL7 (monocyte chemotactic protein-3, MCP-3) [10,36,37,38,39].
Tumors and metastatic sites are recognized as chronic inflammatory foci [40]. The last ones are considered non-healing wounds, where cells constantly release inflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α, IL-6, TGF-β, and IL-1β, prostaglandins, chemokines, and extracellular vesicles, into the bloodstream [41]. The combined effect of these factors may contribute to a pro-tumor skew in the monocyte population and their migration to the tumor site [42,43,44]. Data from mouse models of transplanted mammary and lung tumors show that tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the primary tumor originate from bone marrow or spleen progenitor monocytes [11,45,46]. In a mouse lung cancer model, monocytes take 14 days to transition into functional perivascular TAMs [47]. However, the contribution of monocytes as a source for the TAM population varies between mouse models. Notably, in lung tumors, monocyte-derived macrophages are distinguished by the expression of monocyte markers, including CCR2 (an embryonic cell marker indicative of monocyte lineage), VCAN, S100A6, CD52, FN1, SELL, and TREM2 [48]. A murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) model contained both circulating inflammatory monocytes and tissue-resident macrophages as sources of TAMs [49]. In another murine PDAC model, monocytes were found to differentiate into an intermediate TAM population which then produced two distinct, long-lived TAM lineages [50]. Monocyte-derived TAMs, for example, TREM2+ TAMs, infiltrate the tumor core, whereas tissue-resident-derived TAMs, such as FOLR2+ TAMs, are predominantly located within the perivascular niche of the tumor stroma [51]. Nevertheless, the tumor replenishes all or part of its TAM pool by programming circulating monocytes.
Monocytes in cancer patients have a number of distinct characteristics. These include absolute monocyte counts, shifts in population composition, and changes in the cells’ transcriptomic profile [52,53,54,55,56,57]. Recent single-cell sequencing studies have revealed 3 to 18 distinct clusters of circulating monocytes in cancer patients [56,57,58,59,60] (Table 1). These alterations are clinically significant, demonstrating association with the cancer stage, disease outcome, and response to therapy [43,52,53,54,55,56,57,59,60,61].

3. Pro-Metastatic Role of Monocytes in the Bloodstream

Circulating monocytes are essential immunoregulatory agents in cancer patients. Mobilized from the bone marrow under the tumor’s influence, they promote immune evasion in the blood, maintain circulating tumor cells, and migrate to malignant sites to exert their tissue effects.
Tumor-derived factors are key mediators in the crosstalk between monocytes and tumor cells (Figure 1). The peripheral blood of cancer patients contains a lot of transitory monocytes migrating to the tumor site or the pre-metastatic niche following chemokine stimuli like CCL2, CCL5, CCL7, and CCL12 [37,62,63,64,65]. This often leads to elevated peripheral blood monocyte counts and has been described in several cancer types [5,66,67]. In patients with pancreatic cancer, high CCL2 in tumors is associated with a low CD8 T-cell infiltration and significantly decreases survival rates. CCR2 blockade in mice depletes inflammatory monocytes and macrophages, preventing liver metastasis [67] (Table 2).
In addition to recruiting, tumors can program circulating monocytes either directly or through intermediary cells by releasing various vesicles. One type is tumor microparticles, subcellular vesicles with cytosolic content, which are released into extracellular spaces and enter the circulation [68]. It has been demonstrated that alveolar and interstitial macrophages in the lungs can uptake tumor microparticles and secrete CCL2. This signal recruits monocytes, which, in turn, predominantly differentiate into pro-tumor macrophages that promote tumor growth through IL-6 secretion and fibrin deposition [68]. Tumors can also influence monocyte polarization by releasing vesicles that contain microRNA. In vitro experiments have shown that vesicles containing miR-203 can promote the differentiation of monocytes into pro-tumor macrophages when taken up by monocytes. A study conducted in colorectal cancer patients found that high expression of serum exosomes containing miR-203 is associated with an increased likelihood of developing distant metastases. Additionally, mice injected with miR-203-transfected colon cancer cells developed significantly more liver metastases than control animals [69].
When recruited or transformed by a tumor, circulating monocytes acquire pro-tumor properties. They can attract T-regulatory cells by secreting Il-10 and TGF-b, suppress the activity of CD8 effector T-cells, and produce anti-inflammatory cytokines [4,5,70]. Monocytes derived from patients with metastatic breast cancer resemble reprogrammed immunosuppressive monocytes from patients with severe infections in their surface and functional phenotype as well as in the transcriptome [71]. CD14+CD204+ monocytes isolated from the pulmonary vein are associated with aggressive clinical behavior in surgically treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer [72]. The immunosuppressive form of classical monocytes termed monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (Mo-MDSCs) is characterized by their ability to suppress cytotoxic T cell and NK cell activation and support tumor progression and metastasis [73]. Splenectomy in non-small cell lung cancer-bearing mice depletes the subset of Mo-MDSCs in the blood and can even reduce and delay the seeding of distant metastases [74]. Mo-MDSCs, but not the total CD14+ monocyte population, are significantly increased in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients with locoregional recurrence or metastasis to lymph nodes and visceral organs [71].
Thus, circulating monocytes can be recruited from the bone marrow and reprogrammed by tumor signals, contributing to the development of pathological conditions and supporting metastasis.

4. Monocytes and Circulating Tumor Cells: Cooperation Towards Tumor Hybrid Cells

Tumor cells that leave the primary tumor and enter the bloodstream are thought to be the key players in metastasis [75]. However, most circulating tumor cells (CTCs) die in the bloodstream due to anoikis, interaction with immune cells, or exposure to hemodynamic forces [76,77]. To overcome the stress caused by the bloodstream environment, CTCs interact with various components of the circulatory system. Unlike neutrophils and platelets, whose interaction with CTCs has been well studied and discussed by us earlier [78], the cooperation of monocytes with CTCs remains poorly understood. Some studies have reported a positive correlation between the number of monocytes and CTCs in peripheral blood in breast cancer [79,80], particularly in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [80]. Moreover, the level of CTCs together with the monocyte–lymphocyte ratio is linked to a shorter overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer [81].
Evidence suggests that as monocytes travel through the bloodstream, they can support metastasis by enhancing the mechanical properties of CTCs necessary for their survival [81] (Figure 1). Co-culturing the polarized monocytic cell line U937 with prostate cancer cell lines 22Rv-1, DU145, and C4-2, which resemble CTCs in their nanomechanical properties, increases the softness, deformation resistance, and adhesion of tumor cells [81]. To successfully adhere to vascular endothelium, tumor cells form hetero-aggregates with monocytes due to the activation of TNF-α in both cell types [82]. The central role in the formation of these hetero-aggregates and their endothelial adhesion belongs to the Nf-κB-dependent upregulation of ICAM-1. Notably, the treatment of TNF-α-activated MDA-MB-231 tumor cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG132, which blocks Nf-κB activity, significantly reduces cell aggregation, while anti-ICAM-1 monoclonal antibodies significantly decrease the number of hetero-aggregates attached to the endothelium [83].
Recent studies have shown that tumor hybrid cells (THCs) contribute significantly to cancer progression [83,84,85,86,87]. They are formed by the fusion of tumor cells and normal cells, particularly monocytes. THCs exhibit phenotypic characteristics similar to those of the parental cells, allowing for their efficient identification in clinical samples. Due to the fusion with monocytes, tumor cells acquire the ability to evade immune defense and demonstrate a high rate of proliferation and migration, as well as epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity necessary for adaptation in blood flow conditions [84,85]. Hybrids between tumor cells and monocytes have been found in blood samples from patients with colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers [83,84,85,86]. Across all histological types of lung cancer, the percentage of monocyte THCs in blood in combination with the patient’s sex can predict metastasis, whereas in non-small cell lung cancer, the presence of more than one THC is associated with significantly shorter overall and cancer-specific disease-free survival after curative resection [84,86].
The mechanisms regulating the formation of hybrids between tumor cells and monocytes are poorly understood. THC formation is believed to depend on CD36 expression in tumor cells, with anti-inflammatory polarized monocytes predominantly involved in the fusion process [84]. However, it remains unknown whether tumor cells can fuse directly in the bloodstream or this process is limited to the primary tumor.

5. Primary Tumor: The Contribution of Monocytes in Cancer Cell Intravasation

Invasion and following intravasation of tumor cells into adjacent tissues, is one of the hallmarks of cancer and the first step towards metastasis [88]. Another way for the monocytes to mediate metastasis is to promote the replenishment of the population of TAMs during the invasion and intravasation stages. Here, we do not focus on the role of TAMs in the development of metastases, as this is a subject for a separate review, which has already been covered in other publications [89,90,91,92]. Nevertheless, we would like to highlight several mechanisms through which monocytes can influence the intravasation of tumor cells.
A mouse mammary tumor polyomavirus middle T-antigen breast cancer metastasis model (MMTV-PyMT) has shown that a unidirectional transition from migrating monocytes to perivascular macrophages is required for tumor cell intravasation [47]. Motile, circulating TAMs are newly recruited monocytes attracted by CCR2 signaling, which then differentiate into sessile perivascular macrophages (Figure 1). This unidirectional process is regulated by CXCL12 and CXCR4. Cancer cells induce a TGF-β-dependent increase in CXCR4 levels in monocytes, and CXCL12 expressed by perivascular fibroblasts attracts these mobile TAMs to blood vessels, entrapping mobile cancer cells. Once in a blood vessel, migrating TAMs differentiate into perivascular macrophages, promoting vascular leakage and intravascularization [47]. Following in vitro incubation with conditioned primary breast tumor culture media, monocytes from breast cancer patients secrete higher amounts of immunosuppressive, metastasis-related, and angiogenic cytokines [92]. By releasing IL-1β, monocytes promote E-selectin expression on endothelial cells, enhancing the adhesion of tumor cells to the vascular endothelium [93].
Therefore, although not primarily responsible for the initial stages of tumor cell intravasation, monocytes do actively engage in this process, contributing to metastasis.

6. Role of Monocytes in the Pre-Metastatic Niche Formation and Metastasis

6.1. Pre-Metastatic Niche

The pre-metastatic niche (PMN) represents a primed microenvironment in distant organs that facilitates the colonization and growth of metastatic cancer cells. Monocytes and their tissue-differentiated form—macrophages—play a pivotal role in establishing the PMN including under the antitumor treatment [93,94,95,96,97,98,99] (Figure 1). The PMN is enriched in the pathologically activated form of monocytes possessing immunosuppressive activity, which are also known as Mo-MDSCs. Long before it becomes a metastatic site, the primary tumor and stromal cells, such as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), produce CCL2 that stimulates the recruitment of monocytes and Mo-MDSCs to the PMN and their differentiation towards pro-tumorigenic macrophages [38,100,101]. Circulating monocytes express CCR2, whereas tissue-resident monocytes express minimal levels of this receptor. The recruitment of circulating monocytes to the PMN is followed by a more active secretion of the proteolytic enzyme MMP-9 by macrophages, which facilitates the establishment of the PMN [94]. It is shown that exposure to antibodies targeting human CCL2 inhibits the recruitment of circulating monocytes [38].
In the PMN, monocytes act together with neutrophils, also recruited by tumor-derived CCL2 stimuli, and facilitate tumor cell colonization. Pro-tumor neutrophils can promote tumor cell invasion through the release of proteolytic enzymes and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [102]. However, there are contrary data about monocyte-neutrophil cooperation against tumor cells. In a mice model of breast cancer, it was demonstrated that cooperation of CCR2 monocytes with tumoricidal TMEM173+ neutrophils targets disseminated tumor cells in the lungs and prevents metastatic outgrowth [103].
Monocytes contribute to the breakdown of endothelial tight junctions and the remodeling of the extracellular matrix, thereby enhancing the ability of cancer cells to extravasate and induce inflammatory processes [94]. It has been demonstrated that monocyte recruitment to the PMN is essential for tumor cell survival in murine models. For instance, an impaired monocyte function led to a decrease in the survival of injected tumor cells in the lungs [104]. Similarly, in a mouse model of metastatic melanoma (B16F10 model), the accumulation of CXCR3+ monocytes/macrophages in the lungs was essential for melanoma engraftment and the development of metastatic disease [105]. CCL12, another chemokine expressed in the PMN, attracts Mo-MDSCs to the site before metastasis, prompting them to secrete IL-1β, which stimulates E-selectin expression and facilitates tumor cell attachment to the endothelium [93].
In the context of PMN development, both monocytic and neutrophil-derived MDSCs are essential in creating a suppressive immune microenvironment. The main mechanisms of action include the depletion of T-cell activation by secreting arginase-1 or consuming cystine and cysteine [106,107,108]. Moreover, MDSCs generate reactive oxygen species that can inhibit T, B, and NK cells [108,109,110], as well as produce enzymes regulating adenosine metabolism and others [111]. Established by Mo-MDSCs, the immunosuppressive microenvironment primarily facilitates the survival of CTCs. MDSCs also produce various cytokines such as IL-6, IL-10, TGF-b, and VEGF involved in an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), while MMP-2, MMP-9, and ANG2 facilitate extravasation of CTCs [95,112]. Il-10 and TGF-b promote the recruitment and activation of T-regs, which sustain an immunosuppressive microenvironment. In addition, only Mo-MDSCs but not neutrophil-derived cells in the PMN can secrete CCL7, which stimulates the JAK/STAT3 pathway and facilitates the activation of dormant micro-metastatic cells. In mouse models of colorectal cancer, CCL7 and MDSCs inhibitors support the dormant status of metastatic cells and reduce metastasis or recurrence after radical surgery [113].
Primary tumors can sensitize the future site of metastasis by secreting factors that promote the colonization of the PMN by monocytes. Mouse models of Lewis lung carcinoma and B16 melanoma have demonstrated that primary tumor secretes TNF-α, TGF-β, or VEGF-α, which stimulate endothelial cell secretion of monocyte chemoattractants S100A8 and S100A9 in the lungs [114]. S100A8 and S100A9, along with VEGF-α and TNF-α, contribute to increased vascular permeability, facilitating monocyte extravasation into the PMN [115,116,117,118]. Next, immune cells are attracted to the PMN, leading to an increased production of inflammatory agents.

6.2. Metastasis

To date, multiple molecular effectors of monocytes have been described that may support metastasis formation. Monocytic cells carrying the α4-integrin receptor can bind to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), highly expressed on the surface of mouse and human breast cancer metastatic cells in the lungs. When α4-integrin on monocytes is engaged, VCAM-1 transmits anti-apoptotic signals to breast cancer cells through the PI3K/Akt pathway, promoting tumor cell survival. VCAM-1 depletion using shRNA effectively inhibits metastasis formation [119]. In a mouse model of pancreatic cancer, pro-inflammatory monocytes secreting high levels of granulin glycoprotein promote the production of periostin by cancer stem cells. This process contributes to the formation of a fibrotic microenvironment that supports metastatic tumor growth in the liver [120]. Mouse bone marrow-derived monocyte-like cells recruited by CXCL12 are the primary source of thrombospondin-1, which contributes to the development of metastasis by inducing cytotoxic T-cell exhaustion and impairing vascularization [121]. Stabilin-1 is a scavenger receptor that is typical of pro-tumor macrophages [122]. The tissue repair-promoting stabilin-1+Ly6Chi mouse monocyte subset has been shown to expand following the resection of the primary tumor and to promote lung metastasis originating from circulating tumor cells [123]. Immunophenotyping in mice demonstrated that bone metastasis-associated macrophages express high levels of CD204 and IL4R. Furthermore, monocyte/macrophage IL4R ablation significantly inhibits bone metastasis growth, and IL4R null mutant monocytes fail to promote bone metastasis outgrowth [124].
Monocytes identified in melanoma brain and leptomeningeal metastases have transcriptomic signatures distinct from monocyte clusters in the primary tumor [60]. In metastatic tissue, monocytes exhibit upregulation of numerous pro-tumorigenic and metastasis-promoting factors such as migratory chemokines (CXCL3, IL8, ILB, CXCL2, CXCL5, CCL20, and CCL3), tumor cell proliferation and survival molecules (AREG, EREG, and SPP1), and cancer progression-associated scavenger receptor CD163 [60,125]. Monocytes from metastases are also enriched in pathways associated with NOD receptor signaling, further supporting the notion of an enhanced monocyte migration from the blood to metastasis sites.

6.3. Contribution of Non-Classical Monocyte Populations

Most of the above data on the contribution of monocytes to the development of metastases concerned the classical population. Since this population accounts for 85–95% of the total monocyte pool, studies rarely focus on minor populations, such as the non-classical monocytes. However, unlike classical monocytes, the non-classical “patrolling” subset can inhibit cancer metastasis. In particular, IFN-γ induces intermediate monocytes, which inhibit melanoma metastasis by activating NK cells through FOXO1 and IL-27 in B16F10 mouse models [126]. Monocytes migrate to the metastatic niche and eliminate tumor cells either through direct engulfment or by activating cytotoxic NK cells [127]. Vesicles from poorly metastatic tumors induce a shift in macrophages toward a proinflammatory state marked by TRAIL expression. These TRAIL-positive macrophages compete with NK cells for tumor destruction. Importantly, non-classical CX3CR1high monocytes can act as “intravascular housekeepers” that scavenge tumor microparticles and vesicles, thereby protecting against metastatic colonization [128]. As shown in mouse models, non-classical monocytes scavenge tumor material and inhibit the attachment of tumor cells to the lung microvasculature. In addition, they promote the recruitment and activation of NK cells. Thus, transferring CX3CR1high monocytes into CX3CR1-deficient (Cx3cr1−/−) mice prevents tumor invasion and reduces tumor metastasis to the lungs [128].
Hence, classical monocytes and their immunosuppressive form—Mo-MDSCs—are the major mediators in establishing a favorable microenvironment in the future metastatic site and potentiating metastasis outgrowth. In contrast, non-classical monocyte subsets have the ability to eradicate metastases, which may be exploited in therapeutic applications.

7. Targeting Monocytes to Suppress Metastasis

Monocytes are essential for maintaining suitable conditions for metastatic dissemination across various levels. In tumors and the PMN, newly recruited myeloid cells modulate the local microenvironment by secreting chemokines, inflammatory factors, and matrix-degrading enzymes. This facilitates the migration of tumor cells through the vasculature and metastatic outgrowth. In circulation, monocytes maintain immunosuppressive properties to protect tumor cells from cytotoxic T and NK cells, enhance the mechanical resilience of CTCs, or form hybrid cells with them.
Four types of therapeutic strategies for targeting myeloid cells and preventing metastasis can be distinguished: blockade of monocyte recruiting, reprogramming of monocytes towards pro-inflammatory and anti-metastatic phenotypes, using monocytes as therapeutical carriers, and targeting Mo-MDSCs to prevent metastasis (Table 3).

7.1. Blockade of Monocyte Recruiting

During carcinogenesis, malignant cells release CCL2 to recruit CCR2-positive classical monocytes and Mo-MDSCs to promote tumor growth and progression. The blockade of monocyte-recruiting stimuli by targeting CCL2-CCR2 signaling has long been considered the most promising strategy for inhibiting the metastatic process [129,130]. Although many studies have explored clinical applications of CCL2 or CCR2 antagonists, they have not produced the expected favorable outcome. The studies demonstrated that targeting the CCL2-CCR2 pathway provides no considerable immediate or long-term benefits in either early-stage or metastatic tumors, suggesting the presence of compensatory mechanisms [129,130].

7.2. Monocyte Reprogramming

Undoubtedly, it is crucial to reevaluate therapeutic strategies targeting monocytes. One potential approach is to focus on methods for reprogramming these cells. Monocytes are well known for their ability to exhibit both pro-inflammatory and antitumoral activity and function depending on the context and environment. As shown in triple-negative patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of breast cancer, pre-metastatic CCL2 niches are enriched in IFNγ-producing CCR2+ monocytes only in nonmetastatic areas. This leads to the upregulation of Tmem173/STING in neutrophils and enhances the targeting of disseminated tumor cells in the lungs by neutrophils [103]. Interestingly, neutrophils become TMEM173-positive only if the lung microenvironment is infiltrated by IFNγ-producing CCR2+ monocytes, indicating that the monocyte immune profile can control metastatic progression [103].
Thus, the main goal of reprogramming is to change the phenotype of tumor-recruiting monocytes towards anti-tumoral activity. A potential solution could involve using extracellular vesicles, exosomes, or transcriptional regulators to activate the desired monocyte phenotype. For example, tumor-derived extracellular vesicles from human squamous head and neck cancer and lung adenocarcinoma cell lines can interact with primary monocytes and induce their activated phenotype, which is characterized by the secretion of pro-inflammatory IL-1β and TNF-α [143].
MiRNAs are also known to regulate the functional activity of monocytes and macrophages. MiR-155, the most promising microRNA for reprogramming monocytes and macrophages, enhances the production of proinflammatory cytokines and induces the repolarization of macrophages from anti-inflammatory to proinflammatory [133]. MiR-155 knockdown in the myeloid compartment of transgenic mice accelerates tumor growth and significantly reduces the proportion of CD11c+ inflammatory monocytes [134]. Another potential therapeutic agent is miR-126. There is evidence that the level of miR-126 is downregulated in metastatic tissues compared to primary tumors in breast cancer patients. Moreover, it was demonstrated that duplex miR-126/miR-126* suppresses the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes in an SDF-1α-dependent manner by inhibiting the expression of CCL2 in the tumor stroma [135]. Treatment of xenograft mice with miR-126/miR-126* inhibits lung metastasis by breast tumor cells [144].
Another approach to monocyte programming is to shift the phenotype of monocytes to the non-classical state. To this end, exosomes derived from non-aggressive melanoma cells with low metastatic potential may serve as an immunotherapeutic solution, as they demonstrate anti-tumor properties. The exosomes are internalized by bone marrow monocytes and promote their differentiation into non-classical monocytes. Non-classical monocytes can migrate to the metastatic niche and eliminate tumor cells through direct engulfment or by activating cytotoxic NK cells [127].
Evidence shows that treating classical monocytes with small-molecule activators of NOD2 induces CCR2 expression and promotes the differentiation of classical monocytes into an inducible non-classical phenotype with non-canonical CX3CR1lowCCR2+MHCIIhigh markers. In mice, inducible non-classical monocytes can migrate into both vascular and extravascular tumor microenvironments via the CCR2/CCL2 axis, where they release CCL6 to recruit NK cells that promote tumor lysis independent of T and B lymphocytes, attenuating metastasis [136].

7.3. Monocytes as Therapeutical Carriers

The ability of monocytes to abundantly infiltrate tumor tissues and differentiate into macrophages is used in the development of monocyte-based delivery systems. Due to their phagocytic activity, monocytes can uptake and deliver anticancer agents, including nanoparticles, chemotherapeutics, and gene constructs [145]. Monocyte-based delivery systems have several advantages, such as enhanced tumor targeting, cargo protection during delivery, and biocompatibility. The main principle of this therapeutic approach involves modifying inflammatory monocytes with drug-loaded nanoparticles and reintroducing them into circulation, where they are recruited to the PMN site. The drug is released as monocytes differentiate into macrophages, due to the drug being linked to legumain, which is minimally expressed in monocytes but is significantly upregulated in macrophages. Cytotoxic mertansine, conjugated to poly(anhydride) with a legumain-sensitive peptide and legumain protease, can inhibit lung metastasis of breast cancer in mice. This effect is achieved by assembling the drug self-assembled into nanoparticles and loading them into monocytes (M-SMNs) [137].
There is another, novel immunotherapeutic approach to preventing metastasis called CAR-monocyte/macrophage (CAR-M) therapy. CAR-M therapy has evolved from CAR-T technology, offering enhanced precision due to the active infiltration of myeloid cells, particularly monocytes and their macrophage descendants, into solid tumors. This contrasts with T cells, which often fail to infiltrate the tumor microenvironment. This personalized therapy begins with isolating primary monocytes from the patient’s blood, which are then modified with a chimeric receptor that is specific to the desired antigen and relies on unique viral or non-viral methods for transduction. The resulting CAR-M cells are reintroduced to the patient’s blood by re-infusion. At the moment, CAR-M therapy for up to 12 targets can be designed, and this approach has already been tested against HER2 in vivo. Administration of CAR-M cells in a mouse model of ovarian cancer resulted in tumor control and suppression of metastases [138]. CAR-M therapy was also tested in HER2-overexpressing mouse xenograft models of colorectal and breast cancer and demonstrated synergy with anti-PD1 therapy [139].

7.4. Targeting Mo-MDSCs

While exploring the contribution of monocytes in cancer dissemination and the current innovations in treatment strategies, it is important to consider the Mo-MDSCs immunosuppressive population. These cells are essential for the establishment of an immunosuppressive microenvironment in the PMN. Potentially, therapy can be focused on targeting Mo-MDSCs, especially inhibiting their activity and recruitment into the PMN. Mo-MDSCs-targeting approaches are multifaceted and have been extensively discussed [140,141,142]. For instance, several Mo-MDSCs inhibitors, for example, X-682, a selective CXCR1/CXCR2 inhibitor, have been shown to suppress metastasis [140].
Since monocytes play a key role in cancer initiation and progression, they have become a focus of antitumor therapy. Monocytes are abundant in the blood and have a strong ability to infiltrate tissues, which makes them the primary target for therapeutic strategies aimed at using monocytes as antitumor agents rather than disabling them. Non-classical monocytes in particular can exhibit anti-metastatic activity. This ability can be leveraged as a therapeutic strategy if classical monocytes are reprogrammed into non-classical ones for tumor cell elimination. In contrast, the preferred pharmacological approach for Mo-MDSCs involves depleting their population or inhibiting their function. Moreover, since monocytes are continuously renewed and lack long-term immunological memory, it is important to highlight that this type of therapy will likely require extended treatment. Nevertheless, all modified monocytes will be eliminated quickly, while the physiological population is fully replenished, minimizing side effects.

8. Concluding Remarks

Metastatic dissemination is a complex multistep process promoted by multiple factors. The main cause of cancer progression is the accumulation of somatic mutations and epigenetic changes, improving the ability of tumor cells to migrate, differentiate, and survive. However, the development of metastases largely depends on the availability of an optimal environment in the bloodstream and the secondary sites. Monocytes are key players in providing the necessary conditions that support the metastatic process both in the bloodstream and locally. The most critical effect of monocytes on metastasis takes place during the PMN formation stage when monocytes and their immunosuppressive subtype—Mo-MDSCs—remodel the extracellular matrix and facilitate extravasation, attachment, and survival of CTCs. At the same time, non-classical monocytes demonstrate the opposite function. They can prevent cancer metastasis by scavenging tumor cells, inhibiting their attachment to the microvasculature, and recruiting cytotoxic lymphocytes. A critical question in advancing monocyte-focused treatments for metastasis prevention is how to suppress pro-tumor populations while strengthening those that fight metastasis. Resolving this issue would be a meaningful step toward utilizing pro-tumor monocytes to help cancer patients.

Author Contributions

M.R.P. and T.S.G. performed theconceptualization and wrote the original draft; A.A.K. wrote the chapter about Monocytes and Circulating Tumor Cells; A.A.F. performed the visualization; E.V.D. reviewed and edited the final version of the manuscript; T.S.G. carried out project administration and acquired funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 22-75-10128.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CyTOFcytometry by the time of flight
CAFscancer-associated fibroblasts
CARchimeric antigen receptor
CTCscirculating tumor cells
EMTepithelial-mesenchymal transition
IFN-γinterferon gamma
HER2human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
ILinterleukin
MCP-1monocyte chemotactic protein-1
MCP-3monocyte chemotactic protein-3
Mo-MDSCsmonocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells
MMPmatrix metalloproteinase
M-SMNsself-assembled into nanoparticles monocytes
MMTV-PyMTmiddle T-antigen breast cancer metastasis model
NKnatural killer cells
PD1programmed cell death 1
PD-L1programmed cell death 1 ligand 1
PDACpancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
PMNpre-metastatic niche
SDF-1αstromal-derived factor 1
TAMstumor-associated macrophages
TGF-βtransforming growth factor beta
THCstumor hybrid cells
TNF-αtumor necrosis factor alpha
VCAM-1vascular cell adhesion molecule-1
VEGFvascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Gerashchenko, T.S.; Schegoleva, A.A.; Khozyainova, A.A.; Choinzonov, E.L.; Denisov, E.V. Metastasis prevention: How to catch metastatic seeds. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2023, 1878, 188867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fares, J.; Fares, M.Y.; Khachfe, H.H.; Salhab, H.A.; Fares, Y. Molecular principles of metastasis: A hallmark of cancer revisited. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schegoleva, A.A.; Khozyainova, A.A.; Gerashchenko, T.S.; Zhuikova, L.D.; Denisov, E.V. Metastasis prevention: Targeting causes and roots. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2022, 39, 505–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Olingy, C.E.; Dinh, H.Q.; Hedrick, C.C. Monocyte heterogeneity and functions in cancer. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 106, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kiss, M.; Caro, A.A.; Raes, G.; Laoui, D. Systemic Reprogramming of Monocytes in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Groeneweg, L.; Hidalgo, A.; A-Gonzalez, N. Emerging roles of infiltrating granulocytes and monocytes in homeostasis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2020, 77, 3823–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gerashchenko, T.; Frolova, A.; Patysheva, M.; Fedorov, A.; Stakheyeva, M.; Denisov, E.; Cherdyntseva, N. Breast Cancer Immune Landscape: Interplay Between Systemic and Local Immunity. Adv. Biol. 2024, 8, e2400140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, A.; Sun, L.; Lin, H.; Liao, Y.; Yang, H.; Mao, Y. Harnessing innate immune pathways for therapeutic advancement in cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haynes, N.M.; Chadwick, T.B.; Parker, B.S. The complexity of immune evasion mechanisms throughout the metastatic cascade. Nat. Immunol. 2024, 25, 1793–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mildner, A.; Kim, K.W.; Yona, S. Unravelling monocyte functions: From the guardians of health to the regulators of disease. Discov. Immunol. 2024, 3, kyae014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cortez-Retamozo, V.; Etzrodt, M.; Newton, A.; Rauch, P.J.; Chudnovskiy, A.; Berger, C.; Ryan, R.J.H.; Iwamoto, Y.; Marinelli, B.; Gorbatov, R.; et al. Origins of tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2491–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Andryukhova, E.S.; Tashireva, L.A.; Vtorushin, S.V.; Zavyalova, M.V.; Perelmuter, V.M. Spleen Macrophages: Population Composition and Functions. Cell Tissue Biol. 2022, 16, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Teh, Y.C.; Chooi, M.Y.; Chong, S.Z. Behind the monocyte’s mystique: Uncovering their developmental trajectories and fates. Discov. Immunol. 2023, 2, kyad008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kolypetri, P.; Liu, S.; Cox, L.M.; Fujiwara, M.; Raheja, R.; Ghitza, D.; Song, A.; Daatselaar, D.; Willocq, V.; Weiner, H.L. Regulation of splenic monocyte homeostasis and function by gut microbial products. iScience 2021, 24, 102356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Guilliams, M.; Mildner, A.; Yona, S. Developmental and Functional Heterogeneity of Monocytes. Immunity 2018, 49, 595–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Swirski, F.K.; Nahrendorf, M.; Etzrodt, M.; Wildgruber, M.; Cortez-Retamozo, V.; Panizzi, P.; Figueiredo, J.L.; Kohler, R.H.; Chudnovskiy, A.; Waterman, P.; et al. Identification of splenic reservoir monocytes and their deployment to inflammatory sites. Science 2009, 325, 612–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shand, F.H.; Ueha, S.; Otsuji, M.; Koid, S.S.; Shichino, S.; Tsukui, T.; Kosugi-Kanaya, M.; Abe, J.; Tomura, M.; Ziogas, J.; et al. Tracking of intertissue migration reveals the origins of tumor-infiltrating monocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 7771–7776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, M.; Büsche, G.; Ganser, A.; Li, Z. Morphology and quantitative composition of hematopoietic cells in murine bone marrow and spleen of healthy subjects. Ann. Hematol. 2013, 92, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patel, A.A.; Zhang, Y.; Fullerton, J.N.; Boelen, L.; Rongvaux, A.; Maini, A.A.; Bigley, V.; Flavell, R.A.; Gilroy, D.W.; Asquith, B.; et al. The fate and lifespan of human monocyte subsets in steady state and systemic inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 1913–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ziegler-Heitbrock, L.; Ancuta, P.; Crowe, S.; Dalod, M.; Grau, V.; Hart, D.N.; Leenen, P.J.; Liu, Y.J.; MacPherson, G.; Randolph, G.J.; et al. Nomenclature of monocytes and dendritic cells in blood. Blood 2010, 116, e74–e80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gerashchenko, T.S.; Patysheva, M.R.; Fedorenko, A.A.; Filatova, A.P.; Vostrikova, M.A.; Bragina, O.D.; Fedorov, A.A.; Iamshchikov, P.S.; Denisov, E.V. Chemotherapy-induced developmental trajectories of monocytes in breast cancer. RUDN J. Med. 2024, 28, 427–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rigamonti, A.; Castagna, A.; Viatore, M.; Colombo, F.S.; Terzoli, S.; Peano, C.; Marchesi, F.; Locati, M. Distinct responses of newly identified monocyte subsets to advanced gastrointestinal cancer and COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 967737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guglietta, S.; Krieg, C. Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of monocytes in health and cancer in the era of high dimensional technologies. Blood Rev. 2023, 58, 101012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patysheva, M.; Stakheeva, M.N.; Larionova, I.; Tarabanovskaya, N.A.; Grigorieva, E.S.; Slonimskaya, E.M.; Kzhyshkowska, J.; Cherdyntseva, N.V. Monocytes and cancer: Promising role as a diagnostic marker and application in therapy. Bull. Sib. Med. 2019, 18, 60–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mulder, K.; Patel, A.A.; Kong, W.T.; Piot, C.; Halitzki, E.; Dunsmore, G.; Khalilnezhad, S.; Irac, S.E.; Dubuisson, A.; Chevrier, M.; et al. Cross-tissue single-cell landscape of human monocytes and macrophages in health and disease. Immunity 2021, 54, 1883–1900.e1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bashore, A.C.; Xue, C.; Kim, E.; Yan, H.; Zhu, L.Y.; Pan, H.; Kissner, M.; Ross, L.S.; Zhang, H.; Li, M.; et al. Monocyte Single-Cell Multimodal Profiling in Cardiovascular Disease Risk States. Circ. Res. 2024, 135, 685–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sirkis, D.W.; Warly Solsberg, C.; Johnson, T.P.; Bonham, L.W.; Sturm, V.E.; Lee, S.E.; Rankin, K.P.; Rosen, H.J.; Boxer, A.L.; Seeley, W.W.; et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals alterations in peripheral CX3CR1 and nonclassical monocytes in familial tauopathy. Genome Med. 2023, 15, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Binvignat, M.; Miao, B.Y.; Wibrand, C.; Yang, M.M.; Rychkov, D.; Flynn, E.; Nititham, J.; Tamaki, W.; Khan, U.; Carvidi, A.; et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq analysis reveals cell subsets and gene signatures associated with rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. JCI Insight 2024, 9, 178499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brand, J.; Haro, M.; Lin, X.; Rimel, B.J.; McGregor, S.M.; Lawrenson, K.; Dinh, H.Q. Fallopian tube single cell analysis reveals myeloid cell alterations in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. iScience 2024, 27, 108990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schüller, S.S.; Barman, S.; Mendez-Giraldez, R.; Soni, D.; Daley, J.; Baden, L.R.; Levy, O.; Dowling, D.J. Immune profiling of age and adjuvant-specific activation of human blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. van Furth, R.; Cohn, Z.A.; Hirsch, J.G.; Humphrey, J.H.; Spector, W.G.; Langevoort, H.L. The mononuclear phagocyte system: A new classification of macrophages, monocytes, and their precursor cells. Bull. World Health Organ. 1972, 46, 845–852. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Lazarov, T.; Juarez-Carreño, S.; Cox, N.; Geissmann, F. Physiology and diseases of tissue-resident macrophages. Nature 2023, 618, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dick, S.A.; Wong, A.; Hamidzada, H.; Nejat, S.; Nechanitzky, R.; Vohra, S.; Mueller, B.; Zaman, R.; Kantores, C.; Aronoff, L.; et al. Three tissue resident macrophage subsets coexist across organs with conserved origins and life cycles. Sci. Immunol. 2022, 7, eabf7777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guilliams, M.; van de Laar, L. A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Myeloid Cell Subsets: Practical Implementation of a Novel Mononuclear Phagocyte Classification System. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Troise, D.; Infante, B.; Mercuri, S.; Catalano, V.; Ranieri, E.; Stallone, G. Dendritic Cells: A Bridge between Tolerance Induction and Cancer Development in Transplantation Setting. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Persaud, A.T.; Bennett, S.A.; Thaya, L.; Burnie, J.; Guzzo, C. Human monocytes store and secrete preformed CCL5, independent of de novo protein synthesis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2022, 111, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ren, X.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, F.; Yan, Y.; Wu, X.; Zeng, Z.; He, Y.; Yang, W.; Liao, W.; et al. Inhibition of CCL7 derived from Mo-MDSCs prevents metastatic progression from latency in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Qian, B.Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Kitamura, T.; Zhang, J.; Campion, L.R.; Kaiser, E.A.; Snyder, L.A.; Pollard, J.W. CCL2 recruits inflammatory monocytes to facilitate breast-tumour metastasis. Nature 2011, 475, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Xia, H.; Chen, Y.H. Monocytes in Tumorigenesis and Tumor Immunotherapy. Cells 2023, 12, 1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Greten, F.R.; Grivennikov, S.I. Inflammation and Cancer: Triggers, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Immunity 2019, 51, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wen, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Yang, X.; Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Yang, H.; Liu, T.; Tang, H. Chronic inflammation, cancer development and immunotherapy. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1040163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cassetta, L.; Fragkogianni, S.; Sims, A.H.; Swierczak, A.; Forrester, L.M.; Zhang, H.; Soong, D.Y.H.; Cotechini, T.; Anur, P.; Lin, E.Y.; et al. Human Tumor-Associated Macrophage and Monocyte Transcriptional Landscapes Reveal Cancer-Specific Reprogramming, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Targets. Cancer Cell 2019, 35, 588–602.e510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Patysheva, M.; Larionova, I.; Stakheyeva, M.; Grigoryeva, E.; Iamshchikov, P.; Tarabanovskaya, N.; Weiss, C.; Kardashova, J.; Frolova, A.; Rakina, M.; et al. Effect of Early-Stage Human Breast Carcinoma on Monocyte Programming. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 800235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hamm, A.; Prenen, H.; Van Delm, W.; Di Matteo, M.; Wenes, M.; Delamarre, E.; Schmidt, T.; Weitz, J.; Sarmiento, R.; Dezi, A.; et al. Tumour-educated circulating monocytes are powerful candidate biomarkers for diagnosis and disease follow-up of colorectal cancer. Gut 2016, 65, 990–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Movahedi, K.; Laoui, D.; Gysemans, C.; Baeten, M.; Stangé, G.; Van den Bossche, J.; Mack, M.; Pipeleers, D.; In’t Veld, P.; De Baetselier, P.; et al. Different tumor microenvironments contain functionally distinct subsets of macrophages derived from Ly6C(high) monocytes. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 5728–5739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Andryukhova, E.S.; Tashireva, L.; Vtorushin, S.V.; Afanasyev, S.G.; Avgustinovich, A.V.; Zavyalova, M.V.; Perelmuter, V.M. CD11b+ splenic myeloid cells in carcinoma patients. Clin. Exp. Morphol. 2024, 13, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Arwert, E.N.; Harney, A.S.; Entenberg, D.; Wang, Y.; Sahai, E.; Pollard, J.W.; Condeelis, J.S. A Unidirectional Transition from Migratory to Perivascular Macrophage Is Required for Tumor Cell Intravasation. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 1239–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Aegerter, H.; Lambrecht, B.N.; Jakubzick, C.V. Biology of lung macrophages in health and disease. Immunity 2022, 55, 1564–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Perou, C.M.; Sørlie, T.; Eisen, M.B.; van de Rijn, M.; Jeffrey, S.S.; Rees, C.A.; Pollack, J.R.; Ross, D.T.; Johnsen, H.; Akslen, L.A.; et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000, 406, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dunsmore, G.; Guo, W.; Li, Z.; Bejarano, D.A.; Pai, R.; Yang, K.; Kwok, I.; Tan, L.; Ng, M.; De La Calle Fabregat, C.; et al. Timing and location dictate monocyte fate and their transition to tumor-associated macrophages. Sci. Immunol. 2024, 9, eadk3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nalio Ramos, R.; Missolo-Koussou, Y.; Gerber-Ferder, Y.; Bromley, C.P.; Bugatti, M.; Núñez, N.G.; Tosello Boari, J.; Richer, W.; Menger, L.; Denizeau, J.; et al. Tissue-resident FOLR2(+) macrophages associate with CD8(+) T cell infiltration in human breast cancer. Cell 2022, 185, 1189–1207.e1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Patysheva, M.; Frolova, A.; Larionova, I.; Afanas’ev, S.; Tarasova, A.; Cherdyntseva, N.; Kzhyshkowska, J. Monocyte programming by cancer therapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 994319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bobdey, S.; Ganesh, B.; Mishra, P.; Jain, A. Role of Monocyte Count and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Survival of Oral Cancer Patients. Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2017, 21, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kwiecień, I.; Rutkowska, E.; Polubiec-Kownacka, M.; Raniszewska, A.; Rzepecki, P.; Domagała-Kulawik, J. Blood Monocyte Subsets with Activation Markers in Relation with Macrophages in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, B.; Cao, M.; He, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yang, C.; Du, Y.; Xu, J.; Hu, J.; Gao, F. Increased circulating M2-like monocytes in patients with breast cancer. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc. Oncodev. Biol. Med. 2017, 39, 1010428317711571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xu, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Kong, X.; Xia, S.; Dai, S.; Ding, L.; Bu, T.; Cao, Y.; Liu, M.; et al. Single-cell sequencing reveals alterations in the peripheral blood mononuclear cell landscape and monocyte status during colorectal adenocarcinoma formation. Clin. Transl. Med. 2024, 14, e1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zilionis, R.; Engblom, C.; Pfirschke, C.; Savova, V.; Zemmour, D.; Saatcioglu, H.D.; Krishnan, I.; Maroni, G.; Meyerovitz, C.V.; Kerwin, C.M.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Human and Mouse Lung Cancers Reveals Conserved Myeloid Populations across Individuals and Species. Immunity 2019, 50, 1317–1334.e1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guimarães, G.R.; Maklouf, G.R.; Teixeira, C.E.; de Oliveira Santos, L.; Tessarollo, N.G.; de Toledo, N.E.; Serain, A.F.; de Lanna, C.A.; Pretti, M.A.; da Cruz, J.G.V.; et al. Single-cell resolution characterization of myeloid-derived cell states with implication in cancer outcome. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Larionova, I.; Iamshchikov, P.; Kazakova, A.; Rakina, M.; Menyalo, M.; Enikeeva, K.; Rafikova, G.; Sharifyanova, Y.; Pavlov, V.; Villert, A.; et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy promotes antigen presenting potential in monocytes of patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1414716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, T.; Liu, J.P. Integration analysis of single-cell transcriptome reveals specific monocyte subsets associated with melanoma brain and leptomeningeal metastasis. Ski. Res. Technol. 2024, 30, e13710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vuk-Pavlović, S.; Bulur, P.A.; Lin, Y.; Qin, R.; Szumlanski, C.L.; Zhao, X.; Dietz, A.B. Immunosuppressive CD14+HLA-DRlow/- monocytes in prostate cancer. Prostate 2010, 70, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Charo, I.F.; Ransohoff, R.M. The many roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Serbina, N.V.; Pamer, E.G. Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Halama, N.; Zoernig, I.; Berthel, A.; Kahlert, C.; Klupp, F.; Suarez-Carmona, M.; Suetterlin, T.; Brand, K.; Krauss, J.; Lasitschka, F.; et al. Tumoral Immune Cell Exploitation in Colorectal Cancer Metastases Can Be Targeted Effectively by Anti-CCR5 Therapy in Cancer Patients. Cancer Cell 2016, 29, 587–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Casagrande, N.; Borghese, C.; Visser, L.; Mongiat, M.; Colombatti, A.; Aldinucci, D. CCR5 antagonism by maraviroc inhibits Hodgkin lymphoma microenvironment interactions and xenograft growth. Haematologica 2019, 104, 564–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yin, W.; Lv, J.; Yao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; He, Z.; Wang, Q.; Cui, L.; Dai, H. Elevations of monocyte and neutrophils, and higher levels of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in peripheral blood in lung cancer patients. Thorac. Cancer 2021, 12, 2680–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sanford, D.E.; Belt, B.A.; Panni, R.Z.; Mayer, A.; Deshpande, A.D.; Carpenter, D.; Mitchem, J.B.; Plambeck-Suess, S.M.; Worley, L.A.; Goetz, B.D.; et al. Inflammatory monocyte mobilization decreases patient survival in pancreatic cancer: A role for targeting the CCL2/CCR2 axis. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 3404–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, H.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Ma, J.; Tang, K.; Xu, P.; Ji, T.; Liang, X.; Lv, J.; Dong, W.; et al. Circulating Tumor Microparticles Promote Lung Metastasis by Reprogramming Inflammatory and Mechanical Niches via a Macrophage-Dependent Pathway. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2018, 6, 1046–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Takano, Y.; Masuda, T.; Iinuma, H.; Yamaguchi, R.; Sato, K.; Tobo, T.; Hirata, H.; Kuroda, Y.; Nambara, S.; Hayashi, N.; et al. Circulating exosomal microRNA-203 is associated with metastasis possibly via inducing tumor-associated macrophages in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 78598–78613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Thompson, E.A.; Darrah, P.A.; Foulds, K.E.; Hoffer, E.; Caffrey-Carr, A.; Norenstedt, S.; Perbeck, L.; Seder, R.A.; Kedl, R.M.; Loré, K. Monocytes Acquire the Ability to Prime Tissue-Resident T Cells via IL-10-Mediated TGF-β Release. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 1127–1135.e1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bergenfelz, C.; Larsson, A.M.; von Stedingk, K.; Gruvberger-Saal, S.; Aaltonen, K.; Jansson, S.; Jernström, H.; Janols, H.; Wullt, M.; Bredberg, A.; et al. Systemic Monocytic-MDSCs Are Generated from Monocytes and Correlate with Disease Progression in Breast Cancer Patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Maeda, R.; Ishii, G.; Neri, S.; Aoyagi, K.; Haga, H.; Sasaki, H.; Nagai, K.; Ochiai, A. Circulating CD14+CD204+ cells predict postoperative recurrence in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. J. Thorac. Oncol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Study Lung Cancer 2014, 9, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wolf, A.A.; Yáñez, A.; Barman, P.K.; Goodridge, H.S. The Ontogeny of Monocyte Subsets. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Levy, L.; Mishalian, I.; Bayuch, R.; Zolotarov, L.; Michaeli, J.; Fridlender, Z.G. Splenectomy inhibits non-small cell lung cancer growth by modulating anti-tumor adaptive and innate immune response. Oncoimmunology 2015, 4, e998469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lin, D.; Shen, L.; Luo, M.; Zhang, K.; Li, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhu, F.; Zhou, D.; Zheng, S.; Chen, Y.; et al. Circulating tumor cells: Biology and clinical significance. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Balakrishnan, A.; George, I.A.; Kumar, P. Circulating tumor cells as an emerging tool in cancer therapy. Front. Biosci. 2020, 25, 606–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ring, A.; Nguyen-Sträuli, B.D.; Wicki, A.; Aceto, N. Biology, vulnerabilities and clinical applications of circulating tumour cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2023, 23, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Menyailo, M.E.; Bokova, U.A.; Ivanyuk, E.E.; Khozyainova, A.A.; Denisov, E.V. Metastasis Prevention: Focus on Metastatic Circulating Tumor Cells. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2021, 25, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Stakheyeva, M.; Patysheva, M.; Kaigorodova, E.; Zavyalova, M.; Tarabanovskaya, N.; Choynzonov, E.; Cherdyntseva, N. Tumor Properties Mediate the Relationship between Peripheral Blood Monocytes and Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Breast Cancer. Cancer Investig. 2022, 40, 442–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. De Giorgi, U.; Mego, M.; Scarpi, E.; Giordano, A.; Giuliano, M.; Valero, V.; Alvarez, R.H.; Ueno, N.T.; Cristofanilli, M.; Reuben, J.M. Association between circulating tumor cells and peripheral blood monocytes in metastatic breast cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2019, 11, 1758835919866065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Osmulski, P.A.; Cunsolo, A.; Chen, M.; Qian, Y.; Lin, C.L.; Hung, C.N.; Mahalingam, D.; Kirma, N.B.; Chen, C.L.; Taverna, J.A.; et al. Contacts with Macrophages Promote an Aggressive Nanomechanical Phenotype of Circulating Tumor Cells in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 4110–4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Evani, S.J.; Prabhu, R.G.; Gnanaruban, V.; Finol, E.A.; Ramasubramanian, A.K. Monocytes mediate metastatic breast tumor cell adhesion to endothelium under flow. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2013, 27, 3017–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Montalbán-Hernández, K.; Cantero-Cid, R.; Casalvilla-Dueñas, J.C.; Avendaño-Ortiz, J.; Marín, E.; Lozano-Rodríguez, R.; Terrón-Arcos, V.; Vicario-Bravo, M.; Marcano, C.; Saavedra-Ambrosy, J.; et al. Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells Fuse with Monocytes to Form Tumour Hybrid Cells with the Ability to Migrate and Evade the Immune System. Cancers 2022, 14, 3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Aguirre, L.A.; Montalbán-Hernández, K.; Avendaño-Ortiz, J.; Marín, E.; Lozano, R.; Toledano, V.; Sánchez-Maroto, L.; Terrón, V.; Valentín, J.; Pulido, E.; et al. Tumor stem cells fuse with monocytes to form highly invasive tumor-hybrid cells. Oncoimmunology 2020, 9, 1773204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chou, C.W.; Hung, C.N.; Chiu, C.H.; Tan, X.; Chen, M.; Chen, C.C.; Saeed, M.; Hsu, C.W.; Liss, M.A.; Wang, C.M.; et al. Phagocytosis-initiated tumor hybrid cells acquire a c-Myc-mediated quasi-polarization state for immunoevasion and distant dissemination. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Manjunath, Y.; Mitchem, J.B.; Suvilesh, K.N.; Avella, D.M.; Kimchi, E.T.; Staveley-O’Carroll, K.F.; Deroche, C.B.; Pantel, K.; Li, G.; Kaifi, J.T. Circulating Giant Tumor-Macrophage Fusion Cells Are Independent Prognosticators in Patients With NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Study Lung Cancer 2020, 15, 1460–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tretyakova, M.S.; Subbalakshmi, A.R.; Menyailo, M.E.; Jolly, M.K.; Denisov, E.V. Tumor Hybrid Cells: Nature and Biological Significance. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 814714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gerashchenko, T.S.; Novikov, N.M.; Krakhmal, N.V.; Zolotaryova, S.Y.; Zavyalova, M.V.; Cherdyntseva, N.V.; Denisov, E.V.; Perelmuter, V.M. Markers of Cancer Cell Invasion: Are They Good Enough? J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lin, Y.; Xu, J.; Lan, H. Tumor-associated macrophages in tumor metastasis: Biological roles and clinical therapeutic applications. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dallavalasa, S.; Beeraka, N.M.; Basavaraju, C.G.; Tulimilli, S.V.; Sadhu, S.P.; Rajesh, K.; Aliev, G.; Madhunapantula, S.V. The Role of Tumor Associated Macrophages (TAMs) in Cancer Progression, Chemoresistance, Angiogenesis and Metastasis—Current Status. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 8203–8236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bied, M.; Ho, W.W.; Ginhoux, F.; Blériot, C. Roles of macrophages in tumor development: A spatiotemporal perspective. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2023, 20, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Friedman-DeLuca, M.; Karagiannis, G.S.; Condeelis, J.S.; Oktay, M.H.; Entenberg, D. Macrophages in tumor cell migration and metastasis. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1494462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shi, H.; Zhang, J.; Han, X.; Li, H.; Xie, M.; Sun, Y.; Liu, W.; Ba, X.; Zeng, X. Recruited monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells promote the arrest of tumor cells in the premetastatic niche through an IL-1β-mediated increase in E-selectin expression. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 140, 1370–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kim, H.; Chung, H.; Kim, J.; Choi, D.H.; Shin, Y.; Kang, Y.G.; Kim, B.M.; Seo, S.U.; Chung, S.; Seok, S.H. Macrophages-Triggered Sequential Remodeling of Endothelium-Interstitial Matrix to Form Pre-Metastatic Niche in Microfluidic Tumor Microenvironment. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, Y.; Jia, J.; Wang, F.; Fang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Yuan, W.; Gu, X.; Hu, J.; Yang, S. Pre-metastatic niche: Formation, characteristics and therapeutic implication. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Morrissey, S.M.; Zhang, F.; Ding, C.; Montoya-Durango, D.E.; Hu, X.; Yang, C.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, F.; Fox, M.; Zhang, H.G.; et al. Tumor-derived exosomes drive immunosuppressive macrophages in a pre-metastatic niche through glycolytic dominant metabolic reprogramming. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 2040–2058.e2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Umakoshi, M.; Takahashi, S.; Itoh, G.; Kuriyama, S.; Sasaki, Y.; Yanagihara, K.; Yashiro, M.; Maeda, D.; Goto, A.; Tanaka, M. Macrophage-mediated transfer of cancer-derived components to stromal cells contributes to establishment of a pro-tumor microenvironment. Oncogene 2019, 38, 2162–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Perelmuter, V.M.; Manskikh, V.N. Preniche as missing link of the metastatic niche concept explaining organ-preferential metastasis of malignant tumors and the type of metastatic disease. Biochem. Biokhimiia 2012, 77, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Perelmuter, V.M.; Tashireva, L.A.; Savelieva, O.E.; Denisov, E.V.; Kaigorodova, E.V.; Zavyalova, M.V.; Cherdyntseva, N.V. Mechanisms behind prometastatic changes induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the breast cancer microenvironment. Breast Cancer 2019, 11, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Guo, N.; Wang, S. MDSCs: Key Criminals of Tumor Pre-metastatic Niche Formation. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sceneay, J.; Smyth, M.J.; Möller, A. The pre-metastatic niche: Finding common ground. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013, 32, 449–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Masucci, M.T.; Minopoli, M.; Carriero, M.V. Tumor Associated Neutrophils. Their Role in Tumorigenesis, Metastasis, Prognosis and Therapy. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hagerling, C.; Gonzalez, H.; Salari, K.; Wang, C.Y.; Lin, C.; Robles, I.; van Gogh, M.; Dejmek, A.; Jirström, K.; Werb, Z. Immune effector monocyte-neutrophil cooperation induced by the primary tumor prevents metastatic progression of breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 21704–21714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gil-Bernabé, A.M.; Ferjancic, S.; Tlalka, M.; Zhao, L.; Allen, P.D.; Im, J.H.; Watson, K.; Hill, S.A.; Amirkhosravi, A.; Francis, J.L.; et al. Recruitment of monocytes/macrophages by tissue factor-mediated coagulation is essential for metastatic cell survival and premetastatic niche establishment in mice. Blood 2012, 119, 3164–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Butler, K.L.; Clancy-Thompson, E.; Mullins, D.W. CXCR3(+) monocytes/macrophages are required for establishment of pulmonary metastases. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ya, G.; Ren, W.; Qin, R.; He, J.; Zhao, S. Role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the formation of pre-metastatic niche. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 975261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Srivastava, M.K.; Sinha, P.; Clements, V.K.; Rodriguez, P.; Ostrand-Rosenberg, S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells inhibit T-cell activation by depleting cystine and cysteine. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rodriguez, P.C.; Zea, A.H.; Culotta, K.S.; Zabaleta, J.; Ochoa, J.B.; Ochoa, A.C. Regulation of T cell receptor CD3zeta chain expression by L-arginine. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 21123–21129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Stiff, A.; Trikha, P.; Mundy-Bosse, B.; McMichael, E.; Mace, T.A.; Benner, B.; Kendra, K.; Campbell, A.; Gautam, S.; Abood, D.; et al. Nitric Oxide Production by Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Plays a Role in Impairing Fc Receptor-Mediated Natural Killer Cell Function. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 1891–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Rastad, J.L.; Green, W.R. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in murine AIDS inhibit B-cell responses in part via soluble mediators including reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, and TGF-β. Virology 2016, 499, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Eksioglu, E.A.; Romana, A.; Yang, C.; De Veirman, K. Therapeutic Targeting of MDSC in the Tumor and Immune Microenvironment; Frontiers Media SA: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tamadaho, R.S.E.; Hoerauf, A.; Layland, L.E. Immunomodulatory effects of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in diseases: Role in cancer and infections. Immunobiology 2018, 223, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ren, F.J.; Cai, X.Y.; Yao, Y.; Fang, G.Y. JunB: A paradigm for Jun family in immune response and cancer. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1222265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hiratsuka, S.; Watanabe, A.; Aburatani, H.; Maru, Y. Tumour-mediated upregulation of chemoattractants and recruitment of myeloid cells predetermines lung metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 1369–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wang, L.; Luo, H.; Chen, X.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, Q. Functional characterization of S100A8 and S100A9 in altering monolayer permeability of human umbilical endothelial cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Guo, L.; Li, S.Y.; Ji, F.Y.; Zhao, Y.F.; Zhong, Y.; Lv, X.J.; Wu, X.L.; Qian, G.S. Role of Angptl4 in vascular permeability and inflammation. Inflamm. Res. 2014, 63, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Heil, M.; Clauss, M.; Suzuki, K.; Buschmann, I.R.; Willuweit, A.; Fischer, S.; Schaper, W. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates monocyte migration through endothelial monolayers via increased integrin expression. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 79, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Carmeliet, P. VEGF as a key mediator of angiogenesis in cancer. Oncology 2005, 69 (Suppl. S3), 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chen, Q.; Zhang, X.H.; Massagué, J. Macrophage binding to receptor VCAM-1 transmits survival signals in breast cancer cells that invade the lungs. Cancer Cell 2011, 20, 538–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nielsen, S.R.; Quaranta, V.; Linford, A.; Emeagi, P.; Rainer, C.; Santos, A.; Ireland, L.; Sakai, T.; Sakai, K.; Kim, Y.S.; et al. Macrophage-secreted granulin supports pancreatic cancer metastasis by inducing liver fibrosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Omatsu, M.; Nakanishi, Y.; Iwane, K.; Aoyama, N.; Duran, A.; Muta, Y.; Martinez-Ordoñez, A.; Han, Q.; Agatsuma, N.; Mizukoshi, K.; et al. THBS1-producing tumor-infiltrating monocyte-like cells contribute to immunosuppression and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hollmén, M.; Figueiredo, C.R.; Jalkanen, S. New tools to prevent cancer growth and spread: A ‘Clever’ approach. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 123, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Shibuya, T.; Kamiyama, A.; Sawada, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Maruyama, M.; Sawado, R.; Ikeda, N.; Asano, K.; Kurotaki, D.; Tamura, T.; et al. Immunoregulatory Monocyte Subset Promotes Metastasis Associated With Therapeutic Intervention for Primary Tumor. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 663115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ma, R.Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.F.; Zhang, C.B.; Selli, C.; Tagliavini, G.; Lam, A.D.; Prost, S.; Sims, A.H.; Hu, H.Y.; et al. Monocyte-derived macrophages promote breast cancer bone metastasis outgrowth. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, 1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Skytthe, M.K.; Graversen, J.H.; Moestrup, S.K. Targeting of CD163(+) Macrophages in Inflammatory and Malignant Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, R.; Bao, W.; Pal, M.; Liu, Y.; Yazdanbakhsh, K.; Zhong, H. Intermediate monocytes induced by IFN-γ inhibit cancer metastasis by promoting NK cell activation through FOXO1 and interleukin-27. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e003539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Plebanek, M.P.; Angeloni, N.L.; Vinokour, E.; Li, J.; Henkin, A.; Martinez-Marin, D.; Filleur, S.; Bhowmick, R.; Henkin, J.; Miller, S.D.; et al. Pre-metastatic cancer exosomes induce immune surveillance by patrolling monocytes at the metastatic niche. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hanna, R.N.; Cekic, C.; Sag, D.; Tacke, R.; Thomas, G.D.; Nowyhed, H.; Herrley, E.; Rasquinha, N.; McArdle, S.; Wu, R.; et al. Patrolling monocytes control tumor metastasis to the lung. Science 2015, 350, 985–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Fei, L.; Ren, X.; Yu, H.; Zhan, Y. Targeting the CCL2/CCR2 Axis in Cancer Immunotherapy: One Stone, Three Birds? Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 771210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lim, S.Y.; Yuzhalin, A.E.; Gordon-Weeks, A.N.; Muschel, R.J. Targeting the CCL2-CCR2 signaling axis in cancer metastasis. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 28697–28710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Li, X.; Yao, W.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, P.; Li, B.; Li, J.; Chu, R.; Song, H.; Xie, D.; Jiang, X. Targeting of tumour-infiltrating macrophages via CCL2/CCR2 signalling as a therapeutic strategy against hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2017, 66, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Cafri, G.; Gartner, J.J.; Zaks, T.; Hopson, K.; Levin, N.; Paria, B.C.; Parkhurst, M.R.; Yossef, R.; Lowery, F.J.; Jafferji, M.S.; et al. mRNA vaccine-induced neoantigen-specific T cell immunity in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 5976–5988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Su, M.J.; Aldawsari, H.; Amiji, M. Pancreatic Cancer Cell Exosome-Mediated Macrophage Reprogramming and the Role of MicroRNAs 155 and 125b2 Transfection using Nanoparticle Delivery Systems. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Zonari, E.; Pucci, F.; Saini, M.; Mazzieri, R.; Politi, L.S.; Gentner, B.; Naldini, L. A role for miR-155 in enabling tumor-infiltrating innate immune cells to mount effective antitumor responses in mice. Blood 2013, 122, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ren, G.; Kang, Y. A one-two punch of miR-126/126* against metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 231–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Liu, X.; Ren, Z.; Tan, C.; Núñez-Santana, F.L.; Kelly, M.E.; Yan, Y.; Sun, H.; Abdala-Valencia, H.; Yang, W.; Wu, Q.; et al. Inducible CCR2+ nonclassical monocytes mediate the regression of cancer metastasis. J. Clin. Investig. 2024, 134, 9527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. He, X.; Cao, H.; Wang, H.; Tan, T.; Yu, H.; Zhang, P.; Yin, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y. Inflammatory Monocytes Loading Protease-Sensitive Nanoparticles Enable Lung Metastasis Targeting and Intelligent Drug Release for Anti-Metastasis Therapy. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 5546–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Klichinsky, M.; Ruella, M.; Shestova, O.; Lu, X.M.; Best, A.; Zeeman, M.; Schmierer, M.; Gabrusiewicz, K.; Anderson, N.R.; Petty, N.E.; et al. Human chimeric antigen receptor macrophages for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Pierini, S.; Gabbasov, R.; Oliveira-Nunes, M.C.; Qureshi, R.; Worth, A.; Huang, S.; Nagar, K.; Griffin, C.; Lian, L.; Yashiro-Ohtani, Y.; et al. Author Correction: Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-M) sensitize HER2+ solid tumors to PD1 blockade in pre-clinical models. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ren, R.; Xiong, C.; Ma, R.; Wang, Y.; Yue, T.; Yu, J.; Shao, B. The recent progress of myeloid-derived suppressor cell and its targeted therapies in cancers. MedComm 2023, 4, e323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. De Sanctis, F.; Solito, S.; Ugel, S.; Molon, B.; Bronte, V.; Marigo, I. MDSCs in cancer: Conceiving new prognostic and therapeutic targets. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Rev. Cancer 2016, 1865, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chesney, J.A.; Mitchell, R.A.; Yaddanapudi, K. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells—A new therapeutic target to overcome resistance to cancer immunotherapy. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2017, 102, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Gärtner, K.; Battke, C.; Dünzkofer, J.; Hüls, C.; von Neubeck, B.; Kellner, M.K.; Fiestas, E.; Fackler, S.; Lang, S.; Zeidler, R. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles activate primary monocytes. Cancer Med. 2018, 7, 2013–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Zhang, Y.; Yang, P.; Sun, T.; Li, D.; Xu, X.; Rui, Y.; Li, C.; Chong, M.; Ibrahim, T.; Mercatali, L.; et al. miR-126 and miR-126* repress recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells and inflammatory monocytes to inhibit breast cancer metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Sabir, F.; Farooq, R.K.; Asim Ur, R.; Ahmed, N. Monocyte as an Emerging Tool for Targeted Drug Delivery: A Review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 5296–5312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 17 01638 g001
Figure 1. Contribution of monocytes to metastatic dissemination at various stages of the metastatic cascade: the primary tumor, circulation, and pre-metastatic niche formation. Primary tumor cells release factors that recruit monocytes, support their survival in circulation, and promote their migration to the pre-metastatic niche, where monocytes facilitate metastatic outgrowth. CTCs—circulating tumor cells, EMT—epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Mo-MDSCs—monocyte myeloid-derived suppressor cells, PMN—pre-metastatic niche, ROS—reactive oxygen species, TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor alpha, TGF-β—transforming growth factor beta.
Figure 1. Contribution of monocytes to metastatic dissemination at various stages of the metastatic cascade: the primary tumor, circulation, and pre-metastatic niche formation. Primary tumor cells release factors that recruit monocytes, support their survival in circulation, and promote their migration to the pre-metastatic niche, where monocytes facilitate metastatic outgrowth. CTCs—circulating tumor cells, EMT—epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Mo-MDSCs—monocyte myeloid-derived suppressor cells, PMN—pre-metastatic niche, ROS—reactive oxygen species, TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor alpha, TGF-β—transforming growth factor beta.
Cancers 17 01638 g001
Table 1. Monocyte populations in cancer patients identified by single-cell RNA sequencing.
Table 1. Monocyte populations in cancer patients identified by single-cell RNA sequencing.
Cancer TypeMonocyte ClustersMarkersRefs
Lung cancer
(N = 7)
  • Mono1
  • Mono2
  • Mono3
1. CD14, FCN1, OLR1
2. CDKN1C, LILRB2, ITGAL
3. S100A8, S100A9, CSF3R, PROK2, VCAN		[55]
Colorectal cancer
(N = 5)
  • Classical Mono
  • Intermediate Mono
  • FCGR3A+ Mono
  • TR cell activation related Mono
  • Granulocyte chemotaxis
  • Undefined Mono
  • Granulocyte-like Mono
  • S100A12high granulocyte-like Mono
  • INFα-activated Mono
Not specified[54]
Breast cancer
Lung cancer
(N = 10)
  • FCGR3A Mono
  • IL1B Mono
  • CXCL10 Mono
  • CLEC10A Mono
  • FOS− Mono
  • FOS+ Mono
  • FCGR3A
  • IL1B
  • CXCL10
  • CLEC10A
  • FOS−
  • FOS
[56]
Ovarian cancer
(N = 3)
  • CD16 Mono
  • S100Ahigh Mono
  • MHChigh Mono
  • FCGR3A
  • S100A8, S100A9, S100A12
  • HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, HLA-DAQ
[57]
Melanoma
(N = 66)		1.Subgroup 0
2. Subgroup 1
3. Subgroup 2
4. Subgroup 3
5. Subgroup 4
6. Subgroup 5
7. Subgroup 6
8. Subgroup 7
9. Subgroup 8
10. Subgroup 9
11. Subgroup 10
12. Subgroup 11
13. Subgroup 12
14. Subgroup 13
15. Subgroup 14
16. Subgroup 15
17/18. Subgroup 16/17		1. RPS26, RPL7, RPS3A, RPL21, EEF1A1
2. S100A12, S100A8, S100A9
3. IFI2, IFIT3, ILRN1, CXCL10
4. CXCL9, HLA-DRB5, HLA-DQA1
5. RPS26, RPL7, RPS3A, RPL21
6. CLEC5A, TGFB1, FN1, YWHAH, FBP1
7. RSAD2, CSTB, HSPH1, DNAJB1
8. FCGR3A, CDKN1C, NAP1L1, SPN
9. FOS, ZFP36, BTG1, GPR183, IER3
10. CD163, IFI6, RNASE1, C1QC, C1QA
11. AREG, EREG, THBS1, THBD, TIMP1
12. PLIN2, IL8, HSP90AA1
13. TRAC, TRBC2, GZMA, CCL5
14. NFKBIA, EGR1, NFKBIZ, IL1B
15. FABP5, APOC1, SPP1, HMOX, APOE
16. CXCL3, CXCL2, CXCL8
17/18. C1QB, IFI27, NUPR1		[58]
Table 2. Interaction between tumor cells and monocytes underlying the metastasis process.
Table 2. Interaction between tumor cells and monocytes underlying the metastasis process.
LocationCancer Secreted FactorsMonocyte Cell ResponseCancer Types/Models
BloodstreamCCL2, CCL5, CCL7, and CCL12Recruitment of monocytes via CCR2Lung, pancreatic cancer
Tumor microparticlesRecruitment of monocytes via CCR2
Pro-tumor macrophage differentiation		Colorectal cancer
TNF-αFormation of hetero-aggregates between tumor cells and monocytes via upregulation of ICAM-1Prostate and breast cancers
CD36THC formation with anti-inflammatory polarized monocytesColorectal, lung, and prostate cancers
Primary tumorTGF-β, CXCL12Recruitment of monocytes via CCR2, CXCR4Breast cancer
IL-1βMonocytes promote tumor cell adhesion to endothelial via upregulation of E-selectinColorectal cancer
PMNCCL2Recruitment of monocytes and Mo-MDSCs and their differentiation towards pro-tumorigenic macrophagesColorectal, breast cancer, melanoma
TNF-α, TGF-β, VEGF-αMonocyte extravasation into the PMN via S100A8/A9Lung metastasis of LLC, B16 mice tumors
CCL12Recruitment of Mo-MDSCs and promoting them to secrete:
1. IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TGF-b, and VEGF involved in EMT;
2. arginase-1 and ROS which creates a suppressive immune microenvironment;
3. CCL7 activating dormant micro-metastatic cells		Metastatic melanoma, colorectal cancer
Metastatic siteVCAM-1Monocytes upregulate migratory chemokines (CXCL3, IL8, ILB, CXCL2, CXCL5, CCL20, CCL3), tumor cell proliferation factors (AREG, EREG, SPP1) throught α4-integrin receptor bindingBreast cancer metastatic cells, pancreatic cancer, melanoma brain and leptomeningeal metastases
Note: LLC—Lewis lung carcinoma; B16—melanoma.
Table 3. Strategies for targeting monocytes to suppress metastasis.
Table 3. Strategies for targeting monocytes to suppress metastasis.
StrategyApproachMechanismEffectCurrent StageRefs
Blockade of monocyte recruitmentMonoclonal antibodies or antagonistsTarget CCR2 or CCL2Metastasis inhibition in mice models of hepatocellular carcinomaPre-clinical[129,130]
CCR2+ monocytes decreasingPhase II clinical trials[131]
Monocyte reprogramming strategiesTumor-derived extracellular vesicles (TEVs)Releasing of IL-1β and TNF-α cytokinesInduction the immediate-early responseCell cultures[132]
MicroRNA
–
Pro-inflammatory phenotype
–
M2 to M1 repolarization

CCL2 inhibition		Lung metastasis inhibition in mouse model of breast cancerPre-clinical[133,134,135]
Exosomes
–
Non-classical monocytes shift
–
Activation of cytotoxic NK cells
Metastasis inhibion in mice models of melanomaPre-clinical[127]
Small-molecule activators of NOD2Metastasis inhibion in mice models of melanoma, lung, breast and colon cancersPre-clinical[136]
Monocytes as therapeutical carriersM-SMNsTumor cytotoxicityLung metastasis inhibition in mouse model of breast cancerPre-clinical[137]
CAR-M
–
Tumor antigen-specific phagocytosis
–
Tumor clearance
–
Antigen presentation to T cells

Cytokines and chemokines secretion		Lung metastasis inhibition in mouse model of ovarian cancerPre-clinical;
Clinical studies Phase 1		[138,139]
Targeting Mo-MDSCMonoclonal antibodies, peptides, small molecular inhibitors
–
Blockade of Mo-MDSC functions
Reducing Mo-MDSCsPre-clinical; Phase II clinical trials[140,141,142]
Note: CAR-M—chimeric antigen receptor macrophages, IL-1β—interleukin beta, M1—proinflammatory macrophages, M2—anti-inflammatory macrophages, Mo-MDSCs—monocyte myeloid-derived suppressor cells, M-SMNs—self-assembled into nanoparticles monocytes, NK—natural killer cells, TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor alpha, TEVs—tumor-derived extracellular vesicles.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patysheva, M.R.; Fedorenko, A.A.; Khozyainova, A.A.; Denisov, E.V.; Gerashchenko, T.S. Immune Evasion in Cancer Metastasis: An Unappreciated Role of Monocytes. Cancers 2025, 17, 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101638

AMA Style

Patysheva MR, Fedorenko AA, Khozyainova AA, Denisov EV, Gerashchenko TS. Immune Evasion in Cancer Metastasis: An Unappreciated Role of Monocytes. Cancers. 2025; 17(10):1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patysheva, Marina R., Anastasya A. Fedorenko, Anna A. Khozyainova, Evgeny V. Denisov, and Tatiana S. Gerashchenko. 2025. "Immune Evasion in Cancer Metastasis: An Unappreciated Role of Monocytes" Cancers 17, no. 10: 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101638

APA Style

Patysheva, M. R., Fedorenko, A. A., Khozyainova, A. A., Denisov, E. V., & Gerashchenko, T. S. (2025). Immune Evasion in Cancer Metastasis: An Unappreciated Role of Monocytes. Cancers, 17(10), 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop