Sentinel Node Biopsy Using Two Concurrent Labeling Techniques (Radioactive Tracer With/Without Blue Dye vs. Indocyanin Green-ICG) in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Patients (TESLA–1): A Prospective Observational Study CEEGOG EX-02
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.2. The Tracers’ Application
2.3. Surgical Protocol
2.4. Endpoints of This Study
2.5. Selection of Sites
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Summary of Main Results
4.2. Results in the Context of Published Research
4.3. Strengths and Limitations
4.4. Implications for Practice and Future Research
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pelosi, E.; Arena, V.; Baudino, B.; Bellò, M.; Giusti, M.; Gargiulo, T.; Palladin, D.; Bisi, G. Pre-operative lymphatic mapping and intra-operative sentinel lymph node detection in early stage endometrial cancer. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2003, 24, 971–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Concin, N.; Matias-Guiu, X.; Vergote, I.; Cibula, D.; Raza Mirza, M.; Marnitz, S.; Ledermann, J.; Bosse, T.; Chargari, C.; Fagotti, A.; et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2021, 31, 12–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NCCN Guidelines, Version 1.2024. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1473 (accessed on 21 February 2024).
- Kessous, R.; How, J.; Abitbol, J.; Puzhakkal, S.; Kogan, L.; Yasmeen, A.; Salvador, S.; Gotlieb, W.H.; Lau, S. Triple tracer (blue dye, indocyanine green, and Tc99) compared to double tracer (indocyanine green and Tc99) for sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer: A prospective study with random assignment. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2019, 29, 1121–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, S.; Yoo, H.J.; Hwang, J.H.; Lim, M.C.; Seo, S.S.; Park, S.Y. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: Meta-analysis of 26 studies. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011, 123, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossi, E.C.; Kowalski, L.D.; Scalici, J.; Cantrell, L.; Schuler, K.; Hanna, R.K.; Method, M.; Ade, M.; Ivanova, A.; Boggess, J.F. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): A multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Persson, J.; Salehi, S.; Bollino, M.; Lönnerfors, C.; Falconer, H.; Geppert, B. Pelvic Sentinel lymph node detection in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer (SHREC-trial)-the final step towards a paradigm shift in surgical staging. Eur. J. Cancer 2019, 116, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cusimano, M.C.; Vicus, D.; Pulman, K.; Maganti, M.; Bernardini, M.Q.; Bouchard-Fortie, G.; Laframboise, S.; May, T.; Hogen, L.F.; Covens, A.L.; et al. Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs Lymphadenectomy for Intermediate- and High-Grade Endometrial Cancer Staging. AMA Surg. 2021, 156, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballester, M.; Dubernard, G.; Lécuru, F.; Heitz, D.; Mathevet, P.; Marret, H.; Querleu, D.; Golfier, F.; Leblanc, E.; Rouzier, R.; et al. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: A prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol. 2011, 12, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holloway, R.W.; Abu-Rustum, N.R.; Backes, F.J.; Boggess, J.F.; Gotlieb, W.H.; Lowery, W.J.; Rossi, E.C.; Tanner, E.J.; Wolsky, R.J. Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 146, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González Mariño, M.A. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer—A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment of Meta-Analyses. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2022, 44, 785–789. [Google Scholar]
- Marchocki, Z.; Cusimano, M.C.; Clarfield, L.; Kim, S.R.; Fazelzad, R.; Espin-Garcia, O.; Bouchard-Fortier, G.; Rossi, E.C.; Stewart, K.I.; Soliman, P.T.; et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-grade endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of performance characteristics. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 225, 367.e1–367.e39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vargiu, V.; Rosati, A.; Capozzi, V.A.; Sozz, G.; Gioè, A.; Berretta, R.; Chiantera, V.; Scambia, G.; Fanfani, F.; Cosentino, F. Impact of Obesity on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Patients with apparent Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: The ObeLyX study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2022, 165, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sánchez-Izquierdo, N.; Vidal-Sicart, S.; Campos, F.; Torné, A.; Angeles, M.A.; Migliorelli, F.; Munmany, M.; Saco, A.; Diaz-Feijoo, B.; Glickman, A.; et al. Detection of the sentinel lymph node with hybrid tracer (ICG-[99mTc]Tc-albumin nanocolloid) in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: A feasibility study. EJNMMI Res. 2021, 11, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barlin, J.N.; Khoury-Collado, F.; Kim, C.H.; Leitao Jr, M.M.; Chi, D.S.; Sonoda, Y.; Alektiar, K.; DeLair, D.F.; Barakat, R.R.; Abu-Rustum, N.R. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: Beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012, 125, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bollino, M.; Geppert, B.; Lönnerfors, C.; Henrik Falconer, H.; Salehi, S.; Persson, J. Pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer-a simplified algorithm based on histology and lymphatic anatomy. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geppert, B.; Lönnerfors, C.; Bollino, M.; Arechvo, A.; Persson, J. A study on uterine lymphatic anatomy for standardization of pelvic sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 145, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cormier, B.; Rozenholc, A.T.; Gotlieb, W.; Plante, M.; Giede, C. Sentinel lymph node procedure in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and proposal for standardization of future research. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 138, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burg, L.C.; Hengeveld, E.M.; In ‘t Hout, J.; Bulten, J.; Bult, P.; Zusterzeel, P.L.M. Ultrastaging methods of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancer—A systematic review. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2021, 31, 744–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cucinella, G.; Schivardi, G.; Zhou, X.C.; AlHilli, M.; Wallace, S.; Wohlmuth, C.; Baiocchi, G.; Tokgozoglu, N.; Raspagliesi, F.; Buda, A.; et al. Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in low risk endometrial cancer: Results from an international multi-institutional study. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2024, 34, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chacon, E.; Boria, F.; Lyer, R.R.; Fanfani, F.; Malzoni, M.; Bretová, P.; Luzarraga Aznar, A.; Fruscio, R.; Jedryka, M.A.; Tóth, R.; et al. SENECA study: Staging endometrial cancer based on molecular classification. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2024, 34, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogani, G.; Lalli, L.; Casarin, J.; Ghezzi, F.; Chiappa, V.; Fanfani, F.; Scambia, G.; Raspagliesi, F. Predicting the risk of nodal disease with histological and molecular features in endometrial cancer: The prospective PROME trial. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2024, 34, 1366–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Age (Average) | 65.9 (SD = 10.29) |
BMI (average) | 30.7 (SD = 5.31) |
Number of pregnancies (average) | 2.2 (SD = 1.44) |
Number of deliveries (average) | 1.6 (SD = 0.99) |
Postmenopausal status (yes) | 72/86 (83.7%) |
FIGO (2009) stage of disease (final surgical stage) | IA 35/86 (40.7%) IB 24/86 (27.9%) II 9/86 (10.5%) IIIA 0/86 (0%) IIIB 0/86 (0%) IIIC1 15/86 (17.4%) IIIC2 3/86 (3.5%) |
Endometrioid tumor type | 67/86 (77.9%) |
tumor differentiation (G2/3 disease) | 60/86 (69.8%) |
Absence of LVI | 55/86 (64.0.0%) |
Deep myometrial invasion | 48/86 (55.8%) |
Involvement of serosa | 3/86 (3.5%) |
Extrauterine disease | 10/86 (11.6%) |
BMI < 30 (39 Patients) | BMI ≥ 30 (47 Patients) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Detection rate—TC | 65.4% (53.8–75.8) | 77.7% (67.9–85.6) | p = 0.013 |
Detection rate—ICG | 88.5% (79.2–94.6) | 90.4% (82.6–95.5) | p = 0.083 |
Detection rate—both | 88.5% (79.2–94.6) | 97.9% (92.5–99.7) | p = 0.013 |
Sensitivity of SLN—Tc | 100% (92.5–100) | 97.1% (89.8–99.6) | 0.236 |
Sensitivity of SLN—ICG | 100% (94.2–100) | 97.4% (91.0–99.7) | 0.204 |
Sensitivity of SLN—both tracers | 100% (94.2–100) | 97.7% (91.8–99.7) | 0.224 |
Empty pockets—Tc alone | 0/0 | 1/7(14.3%) [0.4%, 57.9%] | 1 |
Empty pockets—ICG alone | 0/18 [0%, 18.5%] | 4/19 (21.1%) [6.1%, 45.6%] | 0.105 |
Empty pockets—Tc and ICG | 2/51 (3.9%) [0.5%, 13.5%] | 1/60 (1.7%) [0%, 8.9%] | 0.593 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pakiz, M.; Cibula, D.; Wydra, D.G.; Klat, J.; Zikan, M.; Matylevich, O.; Poncova, R.; Abacjew-Chmylko, A.; Cokan, A.; Romanova, M.; et al. Sentinel Node Biopsy Using Two Concurrent Labeling Techniques (Radioactive Tracer With/Without Blue Dye vs. Indocyanin Green-ICG) in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Patients (TESLA–1): A Prospective Observational Study CEEGOG EX-02. Cancers 2025, 17, 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101606
Pakiz M, Cibula D, Wydra DG, Klat J, Zikan M, Matylevich O, Poncova R, Abacjew-Chmylko A, Cokan A, Romanova M, et al. Sentinel Node Biopsy Using Two Concurrent Labeling Techniques (Radioactive Tracer With/Without Blue Dye vs. Indocyanin Green-ICG) in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Patients (TESLA–1): A Prospective Observational Study CEEGOG EX-02. Cancers. 2025; 17(10):1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101606
Chicago/Turabian StylePakiz, Maja, David Cibula, Dariusz Grzegorz Wydra, Jaroslav Klat, Michal Zikan, Olga Matylevich, Renata Poncova, Anna Abacjew-Chmylko, Andrej Cokan, Martina Romanova, and et al. 2025. "Sentinel Node Biopsy Using Two Concurrent Labeling Techniques (Radioactive Tracer With/Without Blue Dye vs. Indocyanin Green-ICG) in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Patients (TESLA–1): A Prospective Observational Study CEEGOG EX-02" Cancers 17, no. 10: 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101606
APA StylePakiz, M., Cibula, D., Wydra, D. G., Klat, J., Zikan, M., Matylevich, O., Poncova, R., Abacjew-Chmylko, A., Cokan, A., Romanova, M., Frühauf, F., Sawicki, S., Mahdawi, L. A., Kocian, R., Mascianica, Z., Knez, J., Dostalek, L., Zygowska, P., Slama, J., ... Dovnik, A. (2025). Sentinel Node Biopsy Using Two Concurrent Labeling Techniques (Radioactive Tracer With/Without Blue Dye vs. Indocyanin Green-ICG) in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Patients (TESLA–1): A Prospective Observational Study CEEGOG EX-02. Cancers, 17(10), 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101606