Next Article in Journal
Osteosarcoma-Induced Pain Is Mediated by Glial Cell Activation in the Spinal Dorsal Horn, but Not Capsaicin-Sensitive Nociceptive Neurons: A Complex Functional and Morphological Characterization in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Phytochemical Modulation of Ion Channels in Oncologic Symptomatology and Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Circulating Adipocytokines and Insulin Like-Growth Factors and Their Modulation in Obesity-Associated Endometrial Cancer
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Expression of Potential Antibody–Drug Conjugate Targets in Cervical Cancer

Cancers 2024, 16(9), 1787; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091787
by Michael R. Mallmann 1,2,3,4,*, Sina Tamir 4, Katharina Alfter 4, Dominik Ratiu 1,2,3, Alexander Quaas 1,3,5 and Christian M. Domroese 1,2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2024, 16(9), 1787; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091787
Submission received: 31 January 2024 / Revised: 1 May 2024 / Accepted: 4 May 2024 / Published: 6 May 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors present an overview and gene expression analysis for potential ADC targets in cervical cancer. The paper is well written and identifies potential targets for further investigation.

I have the following comments/questions. 

1. The introduction is very lengthy; consider shortening and moving some information to the discussion.

2. The methods should be a little more descriptive. Was a control used? Did the authors perform repeat testing to confirm accuracy? 

3. In table 1, 'stadium' is used which is not typical ('stage' recommended). 

4. The discussion does not mention an ADC that has phase III data, tisotumab vedotin. I think this must be included for completeness. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This paper presents an interesting study on the expression of potential antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targets in cervical cancer. While the findings contribute valuable insights into the field, I suggest the authors consider investigating and discussing the antigen expression levels using IHC (Immunohistochemistry) scoring, such as the IHC score or H score. This approach could provide a more quantitative and standardized evaluation of antigen expression, thereby enriching the discussion and implications of the study findings.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

No further revisions are needed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop