Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Signature of Warburg Effect in Cancer: An Effective and Obligatory Interplay between Nutrient Transporters and Catabolic/Anabolic Pathways to Promote Tumor Growth
Next Article in Special Issue
Distance of Biopsy-Confirmed High-Risk Breast Lesion from Concurrently Identified Breast Malignancy Associated with Risk of Carcinoma at the High-Risk Lesion Site
Previous Article in Journal
Prognostic Thresholds of Mitotic Count and Ki-67 Labeling Index for Recurrence and Survival in Lung Atypical Carcinoids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Short- and Long-Term Anticipation of Prostate Cancer Incidence in Korea: Based on Social Aging Trends and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Rate during the Last Decade

1
Department of Urology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu 42114, Republic of Korea
3
Medical Research Center, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu 42415, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Statistics, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2024, 16(3), 503; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030503
Submission received: 14 December 2023 / Revised: 6 January 2024 / Accepted: 20 January 2024 / Published: 24 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Causes and Control)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study aimed to anticipate the short- and long-term PCa incidence projected from the PSA testing rate (PSAr) trend and social aging during the last decade. We found that the incidence of PCa increased fourfold (4533 in 2006 to 16,815 in 2020), with each age subgroup accounting for 7.9% (50s), 31.4% (60s), 43.0% (70s), and 17.1% (over 80s) of cases in 2020. According to the projection of this study, the incidence of PCa will increase twofold by 2034 compared to 2020. If national screening were only carried out in the 60s and 70s age groups, a higher detection of almost threefold would be expected by 2040.

Abstract

The current incidence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, which plays a crucial role in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) in an aged population, is low in Korea. Reflecting these epidemiologic characteristics, we estimated the short- and long-term incidences of PCa. A regression equation model was extracted based on two critical pieces of information: (1) the distribution of newly detected PCa cases in each age group of the 50s, 60s, 70s, and over 80s from a recent period (2006–2020), and (2) the PSA testing rate (PSAr) from the previous decade (2006–2016) for each age subgroup. The incidence increased fourfold (4533 in 2006 to 16,815 in 2020), with each age subgroup accounting for 7.9% (50s), 31.4% (60s), 43.0% (70s), and 17.1% (over 80s) of cases in 2020. PSAr increased by an average of 1.08% annually. If these trends are maintained, 28,822 new cases will be diagnosed in 2030 (expected PSAr: 14.4%) and 40,478 cases in 2040 (expected PSAr: 26.4%). If a public PSA screening were implemented for men only in their 60s (assuming a PSAr of 60% in the 60s) and 70s (assuming a PSAr of 80% in the 70s) in 2030, 37,503 cases in 2030 (expected PSAr: 23.1%) and 43,719 cases in 2040 (expected PSAr: 29.9%) would be estimated. According to the projection, the incidence of PCa will increase twofold by 2034 compared to 2020. If national screening were only conducted in the 60s and 70s, a higher detection of almost threefold would be expected by 2040.

1. Introduction

In 2020, prostate cancer (PCa) was the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in over half (112 of 185) of all countries [1]. Although relatively lower PCa incidence and mortality rates have been observed in Asian men compared to those from Western areas, there is a considerable difference in incidence even within a similar geographical area [2]. For instance, PCa became the most common cancer among Japanese males, with 98,400 new cases being registered in 2015 [3]. In contrast, in South Korea, PCa was the fifth most common cancer with 10,212 patients in the same year. PCa remained the 10th most prevalent male cancer until the end of the 20th century [4].
Several factors, such as genetic susceptibility, lifestyle, and the degree of social aging, may contribute to these differences. However, given similar racial and cultural backgrounds, especially between Korea and Japan, international differences in diagnostic practices among Asian countries are more likely to generate most of the distinction [5]. Many of these differences may be explained by the opportunity of ordinary people of susceptible age for PCa to undergo prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing [6,7].
In detecting PCa, PSA testing plays a pivotal role in the detection of a localized disease that accounts for over 90% of newly registered cases in developed countries because non-metastatic PCa does not manifest specific symptoms except vague male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) that originate more frequently from concomitant benign prostate enlargement. In patients with no metastases and no symptoms, the detection rate of PCa is known to be directly related to the PSA level, which is not disease-specific, but may raise a suspicion of PCa. About 18% of patients with PSA in the 4 to 10 ng/mL range have a subsequent positive biopsy [8]. PSA levels greater than 10 ng/mL confer a greater than 67% likelihood of biopsy-detectable PCa [9]. Although digital rectal examination (DRE) has been recommended for screening, its role is currently controversial [10], and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging has been proposed to compensate for the lower sensitivity of ultrasonography. However, its validation for large-scale screening is still ongoing [11].
Therefore, the opportunity for exposure to PSA testing is practically linked with the chance to screen individuals suspected of having the disease. However, this test is not included in routine health screening programs in Korea, so the current PSA testing rate in men over 40 was only 7.3% nationwide in 2016 [12]. Meanwhile, the majority of the PCa cases were detected in men over 60 (91.6% in 2020). PCa incidence increased with age, reaching 7.9% in men in their 50s, 31.5% in those in their 60s, and 43% in men in their 70s [9]. Indeed, as PSA screening rates have gradually increased, the incidence of PCa in South Korea has also risen, totaling 18,697 in the most recent 2021 report [13].
Combining these unique epidemiologic characteristics of Korea, including the low social perception of PSA screening and the elderly population-driven incidence of PCa, this study aimed to anticipate the short- and long-term PCa incidence projected from the current trend of nationwide PSA testing and official demographics during the last decade.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data sources for Nationwide PCa Incidence and PSA Incidence

For the annual statistics of PCa, the Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS) database provided by the National Statistical Office of Korea was used [14]. The KOSIS database is a national, population-based database of cancer incidence and is currently used to calculate the National Cancer Registry statistics, published annually [15]. The KOSIS database obtains detailed information on the national population in each age group of the 50s, 60s, 70s, and over 80s.
Korea’s National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database was used for annual PSA testing rate statistics. The NHIS covers approximately 98% of the population and provides universal health coverage. The NHIS database includes diagnostic codes, procedures, and outcomes (deaths), and also offers sociodemographic information such as age, health insurance premiums, and residential area. Utilizing the procedure codes, including B5490, C4280, and C7428, males aged over 40 years who underwent PSA tests were identified. All personal identification numbers were encrypted before data processing, and the study procedures and ethical aspects were approved beforehand by our Institutional Review Board (approval number: YUMC 2019-11-012-002).

2.2. Statistics Estimating the PCa Population in the Future

To anticipate the newly developed PCa population, a regression equation model for the estimated incidence of PCa in the future was extracted based on two critical pieces of information from the past: (1) the number of PCa cases in each age group of the 50s, 60s, 70s, and over 80s from the last two decades (2006–2020), and (2) the PSA testing rate from the previous decade (2006–2016) in each age subgroup. The extracted equation then enabled the projection of the number of PCa cases in each age subgroup. Because the KOSIS also provides detailed population demographics for each age subgroup in the future for each year from 2022 to 2047, the total number of projected patients could be estimated.
The study endpoint was the estimated incidence of PCa in 2022, 2030, and 2040 if the trends of the last decade hold in Korea. The estimated PSA testing rate in each age group was supposed to have a maximum of 80%, even if the current trend was maintained. We also calculated the anticipated PCa incidence if PSA testing were implemented as a national cancer screening program around 2030 for men aged 60 and 70 only. This is a hypothetical situation, but assumes a collective implementation of minimal PSA screening in the two age groups with the highest incidence of PCa in the last decade of data.

3. Results

3.1. Current Trend of PCa and PSA Incidence in Each Age Subgroup

The incidence of PCa in Korea increased about fourfold (4533 in 2006 to 16,815 in 2020) during the study period. Within the same period, the average change in PSA testing rate increased by 1.08% each year. Based on this equation, the regression model obtained the reflected number of newly detected PCa cases in each age subgroup.
Y ^ i = α + β 1 ( PSA i ) + β 2 ( EP i )  
* i = age group (40s and under, aged in the 50s, aged in the 60s, aged in the 70s, aged in the 80s); * PSA = PSA testing rate; * EP = estimated population.

3.2. Anticipated Future Trend of PCa in Each Age Subgroup

The estimated total number of PCa cases was 19,227 in 2022. If the current trend of the PSA testing rate was maintained, 28,822 new PCa cases are expected in 2030, when the PSA testing rate is expected to reach 14.4% (Figure 1). In 2040, the number would be 40,478 cases when the total PSA incidence is expected to be 26.4% (Table 1).
If public PSA screening were implemented for men in their 60s (assuming a PSA testing rate of 60% in the 60s) and 70s only (assuming a PSA testing rate of 80% in the 70s) in 2030, 37,503 cases in 2030 (expected PSA testing rate: 23.1%) and 43,719 cases in 2040 (expected PSA testing rate: 29.9%) are anticipated (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

With the accelerated trend of aging in society, the landscape in the incidence of malignant disease in Korea is changing rapidly because PCa affects the elderly population [16,17] and exhibits age-dependent increases in incidence rates [18,19,20]. It remained the 10th most prevalent male cancer at the end of the 20th century. However, in 2002, PCa became the fifth most common male cancer. In 2020, its incidence took third place among male cancers for the first time. During the last two decades, the crude incidence of PCa in Korea increased tenfold (2.9 in 2000 to 32.7 in 2020), and mortalities increased fourfold (1.2 in 2000 to 4.3 in 2020).
As the irreversible aging trend continues globally, the incidence of PCa is expected to increase rapidly. This prediction aligns with current research findings and the conclusions drawn from this study. A literature review identified three articles that projected the number of newly diagnosed cases of PCa among Korean males until April 2023 (Table 2). Anticipating the cancer incidence in 2022 based on the National Cancer Incidence database for the last two decades (1999–2019), Jung et al. reported that PCa is expected to become the most common cancer among Korean males (15.5%), followed by lung cancer (15.1%) and stomach cancer (12.2%). Their expected PCa incidence in 2022 was 22,391 cases [21]. However, utilizing the same data source of the National Cancer Incidence database, Park et al. anticipated that PCa would remain in second place among the most common male cancers by 2035, following lung cancer. The expected incidence of PCa in 2034 was 29,339 cases [22]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is an agency of the World Health Organization (WHO) responsible for managing and conducting the GLOBOCAN project that provides estimates of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence worldwide. Through the GLOBOCAN database, IARC predicts the future incidence for a given country from the current assessment in 2020 until 2040 [23]. Their estimated PCa incidence in Korea is 20,900 for 2030 and 26,828 for 2040.
As such, the authors note that despite using nearly identical data, there were significant differences in the expected number of patients. The traditional statistical methods of population and period do not account for PSA screening rates, which are the primary means of detecting PCa in the clinical setting. Therefore, this method makes it difficult to estimate accurately when PSA screening rates are low or change rapidly. In Korea, PCa ranked third in terms of incidence and prevalence in the 2020s and tenth in the early 2000s. Therefore, public medical awareness and social interest in PCa have only recently increased. As a result, the frequency of PSA and DRE tests, which play a crucial role in detecting PCa, is low, and they are not included in general national cancer screening or health checkup programs. As a result, PSA screening rates vary widely according to education, income, and place of residence. DRE tends to rarely be performed in clinical practice due to low reimbursement rates and the need for time-to-efficiency priority awards within a limited time in the outpatient office. With this in mind, the authors statistically derived an equation that can compensate for the fact that PSA screening rates and PCa detection rates have varied dramatically by age in Korea over the past decade and used the results of this equation to estimate future projections.
Although there are differences in magnitude, all three studies’ data, taken from different sources and methodologies, similarly suggest that the incidence of PCa in Korea will continue to increase for the foreseeable future. Another aspect these three studies have in common is that they use demographic methods without considering the clinical context of PCa at the time of detection, so they do not provide specific projections for the future. For instance, the awareness of PSA testing is currently low in Korea. Indeed, the awareness of PSA testing as a screening tool for PCa remained at 9.7% among those in their 40s or older in a 2019 survey [24]. Nevertheless, all three studies assume that this low social perception will be maintained. However, with the recent surge in interest in prostate disease among the aging population and the increased prescription of medications that provoke PSA testing, such as 5-alpha reductase inhibitors for prostate enlargement, social awareness of PSA testing is expected to continue to grow. From this study, it was found that the average change in PSA testing rates has increased by 1.08% each year from the data between 2006 (2.54%) and 2016 (7.27%) and is expected to accelerate, matching the trend of social aging.
In this background, the present study’s unique advantage is that this approach could explain and project an association between the PSA testing rate and the estimated number of PCa cases. Suppose the current increasing trend of the PSA testing rate is maintained. In that case, the number of newly diagnosed patients will double by 2034 (33,692 cases, compared with 16,815 from the official data in 2020). The PSA testing rate for the entire male population in 2034 was expected to reach 19.2%. However, this estimated figure is about half that of the current data from the US. A national survey from 2005 to 2015 showed that the proportion of American males over 50 who had undergone a PSA test was slightly lower than the maximum estimate of 43.1% in 2008. According to recent research, it has since remained above 30% (32.8% in 2013 and 33.8% in 2015 [25]). Following the first prohibitive recommendations for PSA screening issued by the USPSTF in 2008 for men over 75 [26,27], a clear diminishing trend was observed among men over 70 (from 51.1% in 2008 to 36.4% in 2015). However, among men aged 55 to 69, the mean rate of PSA testing has increased (from 49.8 to 55.8 tests per 100 person-years). This increasing trend in PSA was also observed among men aged 40 to 54 years and 70 to 89 years, outside of the USPSTF-recommended screening age group. The most recent data between 2016 and 2019 demonstrated a 12% increase in PSA testing nationwide [28]. In 2018, US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data showed that the screening prevalence was 43% in veterans and 40% in nonveterans among those aged between 55 and 69 [29]. If the current rate of increase continues in Korea, PSA testing rates are not expected to reach 30% until around 2043, the lowest rate ever reported in the US. At that time, the number of new cases will be 43,864, nearly triple that of PCa patients registered in 2020 (16,815 cases).
Another benefit of this approach is that it allows the comparison of PCa incidence between the current trend and the chances of future public screening. As shown in Figure 2, general PSA testing could be suggested for a highly selected population, for example, only for those aged 60 and 70, to reduce unintended overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Given that even if a national screening program were implemented, it is unlikely that 100% screening with PSA would occur in all age groups and that screening rates would decline with age as compliance decreases, we limit the maximum value of the estimate in this hypothetical situation to 80%. If we postulated that 60% of Korean males aged 60 and 80% of those aged 70 years underwent PSA screening in 2030, the estimated number would be 37,503 in 2030. This figure is 30% higher when considering the original estimation following the current trend of a slight increase in PSA testing, which was 28,822. This anticipation suggests the possibility of a balanced PCa screening policy, focusing only on the most prevalent age groups. On the other hand, the current limited PSA screening rates may be maintained in younger populations. Given the relatively low-risk dominant disease profile in younger counterparts, active surveillance could be a practical option instead of active treatment. Repeated annual PSA screening may be ideal for detecting PCa, but for this study, we wanted to assume a minimum threshold that would reduce overdiagnosis while maintaining an effective detection rate. This requires data on the characteristics of the cancer, as the aggressiveness of PCa must be taken into account, but the current versions of KOSIS and NHIS data do not yet provide these characteristics, so the authors assumed public screening once every 10 years as a minimum standard.
The authors are aware of the limitations of this study. First, we did not utilize the authorized method, including an autoregressive integrated moving average model or time series analysis in future anticipation. However, even using the statistical approach of only projecting the data from the past, the number of estimated new cases did not match, as we summarized in Table 2. Given that PSA testing is the first chance to begin the suspicion of PCa in most clinical cases, an estimation not based on the incidence of PSA testing may not be practical. Second, as recent enhanced social interest in prostate disease developed in the elderly population, the rate of exposure to PSA testing has increased recently. Thus, our estimation based on the 2006–2016 period might be out of date. Therefore, PCa is predicted to be the most common type of cancer among men more quickly than our report suggests. Indeed, the number of articles anticipating the high incidence of PCa in many Asian populations keeps increasing. If PSA testing in each age subgroup affects the incidence of PCa, then an age-adjusted strategy considering the epidemic characteristics of PCa is imperative in establishing nationwide protection from PCa.

5. Conclusions

Due to the accelerating trend of social aging and the social awareness of prostate cancer continuing to grow, the incidence of patients with prostate cancer is projected to increase twofold by 2034 compared to 2020. If national screening using PSA tests were only carried out at the ages of 60 and 70, an almost threefold higher detection rate would be anticipated by 2040.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and supervision: Y.H.K.; methodology and formal analysis: S.W.K. and N.-H.S.; writing—original draft: J.H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant provided by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2022R1A2C1009074).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All personal identification numbers were encrypted before data processing, and the study procedures and ethical aspects were approved beforehand by our Institutional Review Board (approval number: 2019-11-012-002).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Acknowledgments

This paper was awarded the Best Clinical Paper Award at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Korean Urological Association, held on 1 November 2023.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kimura, T.; Egawa, S. Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Asian countries. Int. J. Urol. 2018, 25, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Akaza, H. Urologic cancer in Japan: Role of Japan at the frontier of issues in Asia. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 46, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. National Cancer Center. Annual Report of Cancer Statistics in Korea in 2015; Report No.: 117044; National Cancer Center: Goyang, Republic of Korea, 2017; 221p.
  5. Zhou, C.K.; Check, D.P.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Laversanne, M.; Jemal, A.; Ferlay, J.; Bray, F.; Cook, M.B.; Devesa, S.S. Prostate cancer incidence in 43 populations worldwide: An analysis of time trends overall and by age group. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 138, 1388–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Center, M.M.; Jemal, A.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Ward, E.; Ferlay, J.; Brawley, O.; Bray, F. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur. Urol. 2012, 61, 1079–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ko, Y.H.; Kim, B.H. Should Contemporary Western Guidelines Based on Studies Conducted in the 2000s Be Adopted for the Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Policy for Asian Men in the 2020s? World J. Mens. Health 2022, 40, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Catalon, W.J.; Partin, A.W.; Slawin, K.M.; Brawer, M.K.; Flanigan, R.C.; Patel, A.; Richie, J.P.; DeKernion, J.B.; Walsh, P.C.; Scardino, P.T.; et al. Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: A prospective multicenter clinical trial. JAMA 1998, 279, 1542–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Catalona, W.J.; Smith, D.S.; Ratliff, T.L.; Dodds, K.M.; Coplen, D.E.; Yuan, J.J.; Petros, J.A.; Andriole, G.L. Measurement of prostatespecific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991, 324, 1156–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arsov, C.; Albers, P.; Herkommer, K.; Gschwend, J.; Imkamp, F.; Peters, I.; Kuczyk, M.; Hadaschik, B.; Kristiansen, G.; Schimmoeller, L.; et al. A randomized trial of risk-adapted screening for prostate cancer in young men-Results of the first screening round of the PROBASE trial. Int. J. Cancer 2022, 150, 1861–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boschheidgen, M.; Albers, P.; Schlemmer, H.P.; Hellms, S.; Bonekamp, D.; Sauter, A.; Hadaschik, B.; Krilaviciute, A.; Radtke, J.P.; Seibold, P.; et al. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening at the Age of 45 Years: Results from the First Screening Round of the PROBASE Trial. Eur. Urol. 2024, 85, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ko, Y.H.; Roh, K.C.; Kim, B.H. The national-wide incidence of prostate-specific antigen testing trend for a decade in Korea by age group. Investig. Clin. Urol. 2022, 63, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. National Cancer Center. Updated Report of Cancer Statistics in Korea in 2021; National Cancer Center: Goyang, Republic of Korea, 2023. Available online: https://ncc.re.kr/cancerStatsView.ncc?bbsnum=658&searchKey=total&searchValue=&pageNum=1 (accessed on 5 January 2024).
  14. Korean Statistical Information System. National Statistical Office, Korea. Available online: http://kosis.nso.go.kr (accessed on 1 December 2023).
  15. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer [Internet]; National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2020. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html (accessed on 11 May 2023).
  16. Soos, G.; Tsakiris, I.; Szanto, J.; Turzo, C.; Haas, P.G.; Dezso, B. The prevalence of prostate carcinoma and its precursor in Hungary: An autopsy study. Eur. Urol. 2005, 48, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ito, K.; Oki, R.; Sekine, Y.; Arai, S.; Miyazawa, Y.; Shibata, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Kurosawa, I. Screening for prostate cancer: History, evidence, controversies and future perspectives toward individualized screening. Int. J. Urol. 2019, 26, 956–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sun, L.; Caire, A.A.; Robertson, C.N.; George, D.J.; Polascik, T.J.; Maloney, K.E.; Walther, P.J.; Stackhouse, D.A.; Lack, B.D.; Albala, D.M.; et al. Men older than 70 years have higher risk prostate cancer and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras. J. Urol. 2009, 182, 2242–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brassell, S.A.; Rice, K.R.; Parker, P.M.; Chen, Y.; Farrell, J.S.; Cullen, J.; McLeod, D.G. Prostate cancer in men 70 years old or older, indolent or aggressive: Clinicopathological analysis and outcomes. J. Urol. 2011, 185, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dahm, P.; Silverstein, A.D.; Weizer, A.Z.; Crisci, A.; Vieweg, J.; Paulson, D.F. When to diagnose and how to treat prostate cancer in the “not too fit” elderly. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2003, 48, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jung, K.W.; Won, Y.J.; Kang, M.J.; Kong, H.J.; Im, J.S.; Seo, H.G. Prediction of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea, 2022. Cancer Res. Treat. 2022, 54, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pak, S.; Jung, K.W.; Park, E.H.; Ko, Y.H.; Won, Y.J.; Joung, J.Y. Incidence and mortality projections for major cancers among Korean men until 2034, with a focus on prostate cancer. Investig. Clin. Urol. 2022, 63, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Morgan, E.; Arnold, M.; Gini, A.; Lorenzoni, V.; Cabasag, C.J.; Laversanne, M.; Vignat, J.; Ferlay, J.; Murphy, N.; Bray, F. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: Incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut 2023, 72, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pyun, J.H.; Kang, S.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Shin, J.E.; Jeong, I.G.; Kim, J.W.; No, T.I.; Oh, J.J.; Yu, J.H.; Chung, H.S.; et al. Survey results on the perception of prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer screening among the general public. Korean J. Urol. Oncol. 2020, 18, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Berkowitz, Z.; Li, J.; Richards, T.B.; Marcus, P.M. Patterns of Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Use in the U.S., 2005–2015. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 53, 909–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2008, 149, 185–191. [Google Scholar]
  27. Seetharam Bhat, K.R.; Moschovas, M.C.; Onol, F.F.; Sandri, M.; Rogers, T.; Roof, S.; Rocco, B.; Patel, V.R. Trends in clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy before and after the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against PSA screening: A decade of experience. BJU Int. 2020, 125, 884–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Leapman, M.S.; Wang, R.; Park, H.; Yu, J.B.; Sprenkle, P.C.; Cooperberg, M.R.; Gross, C.P.; Ma, X. Changes in Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Relative to the Revised US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Prostate Cancer Screening. JAMA Oncol. 2022, 8, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alkhatib, K.; Labban, M.; Briggs, L.; Nguyen, D.D.; Herzog, P.; Cole, A.P.; Haag, A.; Trinh, Q.D. Does Veteran Status Mitigate Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer Screening? Analysis of Prostate Specific Antigen Screening Patterns in the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data. J. Urol. 2022, 207, 993–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Estimated prostate cancer cases in Korea according to each age subgroup if the current trend of PSA testing incidence is maintained.
Figure 1. Estimated prostate cancer cases in Korea according to each age subgroup if the current trend of PSA testing incidence is maintained.
Cancers 16 00503 g001
Figure 2. Estimated number of prostate cancer cases if PSA testing is included in the national screening program in 2030.
Figure 2. Estimated number of prostate cancer cases if PSA testing is included in the national screening program in 2030.
Cancers 16 00503 g002
Table 1. Estimated number of new PCa cases and the anticipated PSA testing rate in each year (2021–2047).
Table 1. Estimated number of new PCa cases and the anticipated PSA testing rate in each year (2021–2047).
Reflected Incidence of PCa in KoreaReflected Incidence of PSA Testing in Korea
YearTotal40s50s60s70sOver 80sTotal40s50s60s70sOver 80s
202117,9979512356163776727376.42.05.816.832.135.4
202219,2279712576606824030267.12.15.918.434.138.2
202320,48610012627114871332977.92.16.120.136.041.0
202421,60610212907496925834618.72.26.221.738.043.8
202522,79310412907827993736359.62.36.423.340.046.6
202623,9211061283816710,632373310.42.46.625.041.949.4
202725,1081091276846211,256400511.42.56.726.643.952.3
202826,3101111268872711,925427912.32.56.928.345.955.1
202927,5631131243905012,625453113.42.67.029.947.857.9
203028,8221151241928313,383479914.52.77.231.549.860.7
203130,0761181234950714,237497915.72.87.433.251.763.5
203231,3171201233979214,876529716.82.97.534.853.766.3
203332,543122122210,00715,592560018.02.97.736.555.769.1
203433,692124120210,30916,143591519.23.07.838.157.671.9
203534,871125118510,49916,647641520.53.18.039.759.674.7
203635,991127117710,65917,157687121.73.28.241.461.577.5
203737,090129116710,82317,609736223.03.38.343.063.580.0
203838,179131115510,97818,029788724.13.38.544.765.580.0
203939,300133114511,06618,528842925.23.48.646.367.480.0
204040,478135112511,25018,917905126.43.58.847.969.480.0
204141,679137110411,41219,303972327.63.69.049.671.480.0
204242,781140109611,59719,75410,19528.83.79.151.273.380.0
204343,864143110311,74420,12210,75330.03.79.352.975.380.0
204444,781145112011,85120,58711,07831.13.89.454.577.280.0
204545,654148114611,96720,91011,48332.13.99.656.179.280.0
204646,294151116712,11921,00211,85432.94.09.857.880.080.0
204746,737154118512,26520,96312,17133.54.19.959.480.080.0
Table 2. Estimated new PCa cases for 2022, 2030, and 2040 according to the literature.
Table 2. Estimated new PCa cases for 2022, 2030, and 2040 according to the literature.
SourcePublication DateData SourceEstimated Incidence in 2022Estimated Incidence in 2030Estimated Incidence in 2034Estimated Incidence in 2040Statistical MethodVariables Reflected
Jung et al. [21].2022National Cancer Incidence database (1999–2019)22,391---Linear regression modelAge, period
Pak et al. [22].2022National Cancer Incidence database (1999–2016)About 17,000About 25,00029,339-Age–period–cohort method Age, period, cohort
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [23]Last updated in December 2020Global Cancer Observatory database (from National Cancer Registry, 2018)13,873
(In 2020)
20,90024,241
(In 2035)
26,828Multiplying age-specific incidenceAge
Present study2023Korean Statistical Information Service Database (2006–2020)19,22728,82233,69240,478Linear regression modelAge, period, PSA testing incidence (2006–2016)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pyun, J.H.; Ko, Y.H.; Kim, S.W.; Son, N.-H. The Short- and Long-Term Anticipation of Prostate Cancer Incidence in Korea: Based on Social Aging Trends and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Rate during the Last Decade. Cancers 2024, 16, 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030503

AMA Style

Pyun JH, Ko YH, Kim SW, Son N-H. The Short- and Long-Term Anticipation of Prostate Cancer Incidence in Korea: Based on Social Aging Trends and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Rate during the Last Decade. Cancers. 2024; 16(3):503. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pyun, Jong Hyun, Young Hwii Ko, Sang Won Kim, and Nak-Hoon Son. 2024. "The Short- and Long-Term Anticipation of Prostate Cancer Incidence in Korea: Based on Social Aging Trends and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Rate during the Last Decade" Cancers 16, no. 3: 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030503

APA Style

Pyun, J. H., Ko, Y. H., Kim, S. W., & Son, N. -H. (2024). The Short- and Long-Term Anticipation of Prostate Cancer Incidence in Korea: Based on Social Aging Trends and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Rate during the Last Decade. Cancers, 16(3), 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030503

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop