Next Article in Journal
Adenosine Methylation Level of miR-125a-5p Promotes Anti-PD-1 Therapy Escape through the Regulation of IGSF11/VSIG3 Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Heterogeneity in Cytoskeletal Mechanics Response to TGF-β1 and Hypoxia Mediates Partial Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 12
10.3390/cancers15123187
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in the Histology of Lung Cancer in Northern Italy: Impact on Incidence and Mortality

by
Lucia Mangone
1,*,
Francesco Marinelli
1,
Isabella Bisceglia
1,
Alessandro Zambelli
1,
Francesca Zanelli
2,
Maria Pagano
2,
Giulia Alberti
2,
Fortunato Morabito
3 and
Carmine Pinto
2
1
Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy
2
Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy
3
Biotechnology Research Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Cosenza, 87051 Aprigliano, CS, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(12), 3187; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123187
Submission received: 28 April 2023 / Revised: 6 June 2023 / Accepted: 12 June 2023 / Published: 14 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases in both morphology and molecular subtypes. There are two main histological categories of lung cancer: small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although overall lung cancer mortality is declining in Italy, little is known about mortality trends by cancer subtype at the population level because death certificates do not record subtype information. This observational epidemiological study, using data from the Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry, evaluated the incidence, mortality, and survival trends of lung cancer according to the specific subtype. This study confirms the decline in the incidence and mortality of lung cancer in males, mainly squamous cell forms, inversely associated with cigarette smoking and the introduction of new drugs since 2013.

Abstract

This study assessed the incidence, mortality, and survival of lung cancer subtypes of NSCSLC (non-small-cell lung cancer), SCLC (small-cell lung cancer), and other morphologies. It is an observational epidemiological study using 7197 cases from the Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry recorded between 2001 and 2020 in males and females. The incidence of NSCLC in 5104 males indicates a significant 3% annual increase until 2013 and then a decline of −3.2% that is not statistically significant; until 2014, mortality increased significantly (3.2%), but it then decreased non-significantly (−12.1%), especially squamous cell cancer. In 2093 females, the incidence and mortality trends continued to rise significantly through 2012, and then they began to slightly decline (not statistically significant). The two-year relative survival of NSCLC increased from 32% to 38% in males and from 42% to 56% in females. SCLC in males decreased significantly both in incidence and mortality, while in women, it showed a slight increase (significantly for incidence but not for mortality). This study is important because it analyzes the decrease in lung cancer in males and the increase in females in relation to the different histotypes. Our study’s findings confirmed a decline in male incidence and death beginning in 2013. We were unable to determine if the drop in cigarette smoking and the introduction of new drugs such as EGFR in first-line therapy were responsible for the lower incidence.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases in both morphology and molecular subtypes [1]. There are two main histological categories of lung cancer: small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (13% of cases) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (76% of cases) [2]. NSCLCs include a variety of histological forms, primarily adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma [3]. The diagnostic approach is deeply related to the development of personalized therapy and molecular and precise histological characterizations of lung cancer [4,5]. Lung cancer heterogeneity has implications in pathogenesis understanding, diagnosis, selection of tissue for molecular diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions. Understanding tumor heterogeneity is crucial for future developments [6]. Cigarette smoking is undoubtedly the most relevant risk factor for the onset of lung cancer; in fact, 85–90% of all lung cancers are attributed to it [7]. The risk increases with the number of cigarettes smoked and the duration of smoking [8]. The relative risk of smokers versus non-smokers increases approximately 14-fold and up to 20-fold in heavy smokers (over 20 cigarettes per day) [9]. Significant studies have also shown that stopping smoking substantially reduces the risk over time [10,11]. Unsurprisingly, the earlier smoking cessation is, the lower the chance of lung cancer, approaching the non-smokers’ incidence. Still, smoking cessation, even after many years, always follows a benefit in risk reduction [12]. Environmental or occupational exposures to radon, asbestos, and heavy metals, such as chromium, cadmium, and arsenic, also lead to an increased risk [13]. Exposure to airborne particulate matter and air pollution is classified by the IARC (International Agency for the Research on Cancer) [14] as a human carcinogen [15]. The ESCAPE study identified a significant increase in the risk of lung cancer of 22% for every 10 µg/m³ increase in PM 10 and 18% for every 10 µg/m³ increase in PM 2.5 [16]. Greater gains in risk are documented for adenocarcinoma, a lung cancer histological type more common in non-smokers [16,17]. In Italy, lung tumors with cyto-histological confirmation are approximately ¾ of the entire series (41,500 new cases); of these, 40% are adenocarcinomas (34% in men and 50% in women), 21% are squamous cell carcinomas (21% among men and 12% among women), 12% are from small cell tumors, 2% are from large cell tumors, and the remainder are from other and unspecified morphologies [18]. To date, a limited percentage of cases of NSCLC are diagnosed in the early stage [19] in which patients are potential candidates for surgery, possibly followed by chemotherapy to reduce the risk of recurrence or a locally advanced stage. In this setting, chemotherapy and radiotherapy represent the treatment backbone, possibly associated with immunotherapy at their completion [20,21]. In this respect, two critical therapeutic approaches have revolutionized the medical oncology therapeutic algorithm, i.e., molecularly targeted drugs and immunotherapy. Some drugs with a molecular target [22,23,24], a shining example among others, are the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. In patients with the specific molecular target altered, these new drugs show a consistent clinical advantage to chemotherapy as the first-choice treatment. In the immunotherapy field, checkpoint inhibitors were first established as an effective treatment in relapse-resistant patients who had previously failed chemotherapy and subsequently proved to be superior to chemotherapy in first-line treatment, especially in patients with high PD-L1 expression in the neoplastic tissue [25,26]. Finally, in recent years, significant results have been obtained by combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy, even in cases with low or absent PD-L1 expression [27]. Although the incidence trends of the subtypes are well described [28,29,30], more knowledge is needed on the related mortality trends. More specifically, increasing awareness of lung cancer mortality trends according to histological subtype is extremely important to evaluate, since the potential adoption of lung cancer screening and smoking reduction can probably influence mortality differently related to the subtype [31,32,33].
This work aims to describe lung cancer incidence and mortality trends in a province of northern Italy by the histological subtype.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Setting

This observational epidemiological study used data from the Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry (RE-CR) approved by the provincial Ethics Committee of Reggio Emilia (Protocol no. 2014/0019740 of 04/08/2014). The RE-CR covers a population of 532,000 inhabitants and is considered a high-quality CR due to the up-to-date data that extend to the end of 2020 with a high percentage of microscopic confirmation (83.5% for lung cancer) and a rate of Death Certificate Only (DCO) below 0.1% [34].

2.2. Data Sources

The primary information sources of the RE-CR are anatomic pathology reports, hospital discharge records, and mortality data integrated with laboratory tests, diagnostic reports, and information from general practitioners. The study included lung cancer data divided into three groups as suggested by the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3) [35] as topography C34: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and other morphologies. The morphological ICD-O-3 codes included in the NSCLC group were the following: 8140, 8250-8255, 8260, 8333, 8480-8481, 8490, 8550 (adenocarcinoma), 8070-8075, 8123 (squamous cell carcinoma), 8012-8014 (large cell carcinoma), 8021-8022 (anaplastic and pleomorphic carcinoma), 8031-8033 (giant cell and spindle cell carcinoma), 8046 (non-small cell carcinoma), 8200 (adenoid cystic carcinoma), 8240-8241/8243-8246/8249 (carcinoids), 8430 (mucoepidermoid carcinoma), and 8560 (adenosquamous carcinoma). The SCLC group included codes 8041-8045 (small cell carcinoma) and 8002 (malignant small cell tumor). Finally, the codes of the other morphologies group were 8000-8001 (malignant neoplasm), 8010 (carcinoma), 8020 (undifferentiated carcinoma), 8230 (solid carcinoma), 8800 (sarcoma), 8815 (fibrous tumor), 8890 (leiomyosarcoma), 8980 (carcinosarcoma), 9040 (synovial sarcoma), 9120 (hemangiosarcoma), and 9133 (epithelioid hemangioendothelioma).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analyses of patient characteristics, sex, age of diagnosis, year of diagnosis, and method of diagnosis were performed by groups. The standardized incidence and mortality rates of the last twenty years (2001–2020) were calculated for all three groups divided by males and females. For NSCLC, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma were separately described. Population estimates, which were used to derive the rates, are represented by the general population of the Province of Reggio Emilia recorded on January 1st of each year. The incidence and incidence-based mortality rates were adjusted to the 2013 European standard population and calculated per 100,000 person-years. Finally, we calculated 2-year relative survival among patients with lung cancer according to sex, groups (NSCLC and SCLC), and calendar year using the relative survival approach and Pohar Perme method [36]; 95% confidence intervals (CI) were also reported, and a p-value ≤ 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. The trends over time were analyzed by calculating the annual percent change (APC) in age-standardized rates using joinpoint regression [37]. The APC is one way to characterize the trends in cancer rates over time; the output includes the estimated annual percentage rate change. With this approach, the cancer rates are assumed to change at a constant percentage of the rate of the previous year. As for the intervals used, joinpoint fits the selected trend data (incidence and mortality rates) into the simplest joinpoint model that the data allow. It is not always reasonable to expect that a single APC can accurately characterize the trend over an entire series of data. The joinpoint model uses statistical criteria to determine when and how often the APC changes. The maximum number of joinpoints predicted for these analyses was fixed to four. Analyses were performed using STATA 16.1 software (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

The comparison of lung cancer deaths recorded on the death certificates (the death certificate is filled in by the necroscopist on a special form that certifies the fact of death and the cause of death as well as all the personal data of the deceased person) and cancer registry-based mortality does not show any significant variation in the 20 years considered (Figure 1), suggesting a good coding of the causes of death in the mortality registry. From 2001 to 2020, 7197 lung cancers were registered (5104 in males and 2093 in females) (Table 1). Most cancers (3082) were recorded at age 75+ years, 2356 at age 65–74 years, and 1264 at age 55–64 years. Less than 500 cases were registered under the age of 55 years. In the four periods considered (2001–2005, 2006–2010, 2011–2015, and 2016–2020), a different distribution of tumors by year of diagnosis is not observed, while the method of diagnosis shows approximately 80% of tumors with microscopic confirmation. Regarding the morphology, 4038 (56.1%) are NSCLC, 876 (12.2%) are SCLC, and 2283 (31.7%) are other morphologies.
Figure 2 shows the results for NSCLC separately for males and females. Among males (Figure 2, left), the incidence significantly increased by 3% annually until 2013 (95%CI 1.2; 4.9) and then non-significantly decreased (−3.2; 95%CI −7.5; 1.3). Mortality also significantly increased until 2014 (3.2; 95%CI 2; 4.4) and continued to non-significantly decrease in subsequent years (−12.1; 95%CI −32.0; 12.7). In females (Figure 2, right), the incidence significantly increased up to 2012 by 8.7% annually (95%CI 5.3; 12.3), while in subsequent years, the incidence remained stable: −0.7 (95%CI −5.3; 4.1). Mortality followed the same trend with a significant increase of 10.6% (95%CI 8.1; 13.1) until 2014 and then remained stable with a weak non-significant increase of 1.6% (95%CI −4.7; 8.2).
Adenocarcinoma showed a significant increase in the incidence in males up to 2012 of 7.0% (95%CI 3.6; 10.5), while in the subsequent period, the incidence was stable. Mortality continued to non-significantly increase by 3.7% (95%CI 2.3; −5.1) (Figure 3A). In females, the incidence showed a significant increase of 11.7% (95%CI 7.9; 15.6) until 2011 followed by a substantial significant increase in mortality of 11% (95%CI 8.2; 13.9) until 2015. In subsequent periods, the incidence and mortality showed a slight downward non-significant trend (Figure 3B). In regards to the squamous cell trends, on the other hand, there was a significant decrease of incidence by −2.4% (95%CI −4.2; −0.5) followed by a significant decrease in mortality of 4.0% in males (95% CI −4.9; −3.0) (Figure 3C), while in females, both trends were slightly non-significantly increased (Figure 3D).
In regards to SCLC in males, there was a significant decrease in the incidence of −2.1% (95%CI −4.0; −0.2) and mortality of −1.7% (95% CI −3.4; −0.1); in females, on the contrary, the incidence significantly increased by 2% annually (95%CI 0.4; 3.7), while mortality showed a slight non-significant increase of 0.5% (95%CI −2.5; 3.5) (Figure 4).
The two-year relative survival among patients with NSCLC was higher among women than among men; survival among women improved from 42% (95%CI 25; 59) in 2001 to 56% (95%CI 44; 67) in 2018 (Figure 5A), while in males, it passed from 32% (95%CI 21; 42) to 38% (95%CI 30; 46) in the same period (Figure 5B).The survival among men patients with SCLC, remained constant over the years (from 11% (95%CI 4; 25) in 2001 to 13% (95%CI 5; 31) in 2018) (Figure 5C), while in women, a slight increase (from 15% (95%CI 3; 37) to 18% (95%CI 5; 39) in the same period was observed (Figure 5D).
In regards to the category of other morphologies (Figure 6), in males, after an initial non-significant increase in incidence up to 2004, a significant decrease of −14.7% (95%CI −19.4, −9.7) was observed up to 2012 followed by a modest reduction in subsequent years. Mortality showed a similar trend with a slight non-significant increase up to 2007 and a significant decrease of −29% (95% CI −48.4; −2.3) followed by a slight non-significant decrease of −2%. In females, there was a significant increase in incidence up to 2007 of 6% (95%CI 0.1; 12.2) followed by a significant decrease of −30.5% (95%CI −51.5; −0.5) and, then again, a significant increase of 5.4% (95%CI 1.4; 9.6) followed by mortality, which had completely overlapping trends.

4. Discussion

This study described the trends in mortality among patients with a different subtype of lung cancer in a northern Italian province and showed an increase in incidence and mortality in males first in 2013 and then a subsequent decrease after that year for NSCLC. In females, on the other hand, there was a constant increase in both indicators. As for SCLC, there was a constant decrease in the incidence and mortality in males, while in females, the opposite occurred, especially for the incidence. In general, survival is increasing for both histological types and genders, although it is more marked in females in the NSCLC form.
In general, the incidence rates in the USA fall more in metropolitan than non-metropolitan areas, more in males than females, and more in the young than in the elderly [38]. The variability in the occurrence of lung cancer may be explained by many risk factors that were not investigated in this study [39,40,41].
In the UK, the relative risk of lung cancer is 14 times higher in smokers than in non-smokers. In the USA, the mortality from lung cancer is 101.2 per 100,000 smokers and 8.6 per 100,000 non-smokers. In addition, the risk of cancer is 2.6 and 2 times greater in smokers and female smokers in China, respectively [42]. In America and Europe, the APC (annual percent change) is decreasing in males (from −0.7 in 1975–1985 to −2.9 in 1985–2005) and increasing in females (from 1.3 to 5 in the same period); in Asia, the trends are stable. The morphology of adenocarcinoma is more frequent in the black population in the USA and China (the lowest in India), while adenosquamous is frequent in Slovakia, Germany, and France [43]. The trends appear to be decreasing in males and are also beginning to drop in females in many countries. The incidence increased from 100 to 130 cases per 100,000 males in 1980 before declining to 80 cases per 100,000 in 2005 in Singapore. In females, the rate also reached 40 cases per 100,000 before falling to 25 per 100,000 [44]. In the USA, between 2005 and 2009, the incidence was higher in males than in females, except for young people under the age of 45 years. In both sexes, the trend is decreasing both in men (APC −2.6) and women (APC −1.1) [45]. Recent work showed that NSCLC mortality decreased faster than the incidence, and this was associated with a substantial improvement in survival coinciding with the approval of target therapies. In males, the incidence-based mortality of NSCLC decreased by 6.3%, while the incidence decreased by 3.1% annually, related mainly to the EGFR first-line therapy introduction in 2013 [2]. Similar patterns were observed in females with NSCLC. In contrast, mortality from NSCLC declined, but the decline is related almost entirely to a decrease in the incidence rather than an increase in survival.
Unlike what was stated in Hawlader’s paper [2], we did not observe substantial differences in terms of mortality incidence comparing deaths recorded by the Death-Certified Mortality database and Cancer Registry over the 20 years examined. This confirms the optimal quality of our Cancer Registry data and the coding of mortality in general. For NSCLC in males, the increase in incidence until 2013 was followed by a decline in incidence (although not significant) until recent years. Mortality followed a similar pattern, first rising and then falling with period overlap. The trend is very similar to what was reported by the American study, even if the small numbers in our case do not allow for reaching statistical significance. Similar patterns are observed in women: a sharp increase in incidence and mortality followed by a plateau phase. The two-year survival shows an almost constant trend over the years, approximately 32% in males with an increase to 38% for cases diagnosed in 2018; in females, survival increased from 42% in the first few years to 56% in 2018 with improvements similar to what is reported in other studies [2,46]. Specifically, in our study, an increase in adenocarcinoma, both in terms of incidence and mortality, was recorded in males; the significant decrease was only the prerogative of the squamous cell forms. In addition, our current paper shows that the drop in mortality (−4.0) is almost double compared to the reduction in the incidence (−2.4%) observed in Hawlader’s study. We can only speculate that the decrease in the incidence and mortality of squamous forms may be somewhat attributed to the decline in cigarette smoking among men because there are no data on this issue available for our research [47]. Still, it is also due to the introduction of new drugs starting from 2011 with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma and from 2017 with immune checkpoint inhibitors [48].
Also, the SCLC forms show a significant decrease in incidence and mortality in males, as in the study by Hawlader [2]. In contrast, the incidence increases in females, but the mortality remains constant. On the other hand, survival has not been affected in the slightest by medical progress, settling at values of approximately 11–12% over the years in males. Unfortunately, too small numbers were accounted for in females, preventing any analysis. The other forms group is usually excluded from the analyses, although representing roughly one-third of cases, and deserves few comments. In this setting, a significant and continuous decrease in the incidence in males was detected. More importantly, we documented a decrease in mortality (−29%), suggesting that these are NSCLC forms for which treatment innovation has positively and powerfully impacted the survival length. In females, the significant increase in incidence over the years coincided with a decrease in mortality over the same period, although not significant.
Among the strengths of this study, we should mention the availability of 20 years of registration; the good quality of the data not only on incidence but also on mortality; the availability of very recent data; and the possibility of stratifying NSCLC into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and other morphologies. A limitation of this study is related to the fact that the numbers are relatively small since they refer to a single Cancer Registry. Another limitation of this study is the absence of individual information on the smoking habits of the cases in our study; therefore, only correlations with smoking habit trends in Italy can be made [49]. In addition, we do not have individual data on the type of treatment; therefore, we can only associate the introduction, for example, of the drugs used since 2014 in our province.

5. Conclusions

Based on a sample of more than 7000 patients with lung cancer in a province of northern Italy, our study confirmed a decline in male incidence and mortality since 2013 for NSCLC and for the squamous cell form in particular. However, we were unable to determine whether the decline in cigarette smoking and the introduction of new drugs such as EGFR into first-line therapy were responsible for the lower incidence [50]. In females, on the other hand, we noticed an increase in adenocarcinoma. Two-year survival for both sexes is increasing. For SCLC, mortality and incidence are decreasing in males, while they are slightly increasing in females.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft, visualization, supervision, L.M.; formal analysis, supervision, visualization F.M. (Francesco Marinelli); writing—review and editing and visualization, supervision I.B.; investigation and supervision A.Z.; investigation, supervision F.Z.; investigation, supervision M.P.; investigation, supervision G.A.; investigation, supervision F.M. (Fortunato Morabito); conceptualization, writing—original draft, investigation, and management, C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health–Ricerca Corrente Annual Program 2024.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This observational epidemiological study uses data from the Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry approved by the Provincial Ethics Committee of Reggio Emilia (ref. no. 2014/0019740 of 4 August 2014). The Ethics Committee authorized, even in the absence of consent, the processing of personal data, including those suitable for revealing the state of health of patients who are deceased or untraceable for the execution of the study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical and privacy issues; requests for data must be approved by the Ethics Committee after the presentation of a study protocol.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Travis, W.D.; Brambilla, E.; Burke, A.P.; Marx, A.; Nicholson, A.G. Introduction to the 2015 World Health Organi-zation classification of tumors of the lung, pleura, thymus, and heart. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2015, 10, 1240–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Howlader, N.; Forjaz, G.; Mooradian, M.J.; Meza, R.; Kong, C.Y.; Cronin, K.A.; Mariotto, A.B.; Lowy, D.R.; Feuer, E.J. The Effect of Advances in Lung-Cancer Treatment on Population Mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 640–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Linnoila, I. Pathology of non-small cell lung cancer. New diagnostic approaches. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 1990, 4, 1027–1051. [Google Scholar]
  4. Utada, M.; Yonehara, S.; Ozasa, K. Historical Changes in Histological Diagnosis of Lung Cancer. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 29, 238–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Guan, X.; Qin, T.; Qi, T. Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Theranostics: Paving the Way from Traditional Technology to Advance Era. Cancer Control. 2022, 29, 10732748221077351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Sousa, V.M.L.; Carvalho, L. Heterogeneity in Lung Cancer. Pathobiology 2018, 85, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Freedman, N.D.; Leitzmann, M.F.; Hollenbeck, A.R.; Schatzkin, A.; Abnet, C.C. Cigarette smoking and subsequent risk of lung cancer in men and women: Analysis of a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Weber, M.F.; Sarich, P.E.A.; Vaneckova, P.; Wade, S.; Egger, S.; Ngo, P.; Joshy, G.; Goldsbury, D.E.; Yap, S.; Feletto, E.; et al. Cancer incidence and cancer death in relation to tobacco smoking in a population-based Australian cohort study. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 149, 1076–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jha, P. The hazards of smoking and the benefits of cessation: A critical summation of the epidemiological evidence in high-income countries. eLife 2020, 9, e49979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Toll, B.A.; Rojewski, A.M.; Duncan, L.R.; Latimer-Cheung, A.E.; Fucito, L.M.; Boyer, J.L.; O’Malley, S.S.; Salovey, P.; Herbst, R.S. “Quitting Smoking Will Benefit Your Health”: The Evolution of Clinician Messaging to Encourage Tobacco Cessation. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/quit_smoking/how_to_quit/benefits/index.htm (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  12. Khuder, S.A.; Mutgi, A.B. Effect of Smoking Cessation on Major Histologic Types of Lung Cancer. Chest 2001, 120, 1577–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Shankar, A.; Dubey, A.; Saini, D.; Singh, M.; Prasad, C.P.; Roy, S.; Bharati, S.J.; Rinki, M.; Singh, N.; Seth, T.; et al. Environmental and occupational determinants of lung cancer. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2019, 8 (Suppl. S1), S31–S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Available online: https://www.iarc.who.int/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  15. Loomis, D.; Huang, W.; Chen, G. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluation of the carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution: Focus on China. Chin. J. Cancer 2014, 33, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; Andersen, Z.J.; Beelen, R.; Samoli, E.; Stafoggia, M.; Weinmayr, G.; Hoffmann, B.; Fischer, P.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.; Brunekreef, B.; et al. Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in 17 European cohorts: Prospective analyses from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE). Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 813–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. IARC Monographs: Vol. 109: Outdoor Air Pollution. Available online: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol.109/mono109.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  18. AIOM-AIRTUM-SIAPEC-IAP. The Numbers of Cancer in Italy, 2018; Intermedia Editore: Brescia, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. De Marinis, F.; Attili, I.; Gridelli, C.; Cecere, F.; Curcio, C.; Facciolo, F.; Spaggiari, L. Incorporating atezolizumab in the adjuvant setting of non-small cell lung cancer: Key discussion points from an expert multidisciplinary panel by Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 971042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jing, Z.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, N. Achievement of long-term local control after radiation and anti-PD-1 immuno-therapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ther. Adv. Chronic. Dis. 2021, 12, 20406223211047306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Filippi, A.R.; Di Muzio, J.; Badellino, S.; Mantovani, C.; Ricardi, U. Locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Shall immunotherapy be a new chance? J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10 (Suppl. S13), S1461–S1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. García, B.; Neninger, E.; de la Torre, A.; Leonard, I.; Martínez, R.; Viada, C.; González, G.; Mazorra, Z.; Lage, A.; Crombet, T. Effective Inhibition of the Epidermal Growth Factor/Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Binding by Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Antibodies Is Related to Better Survival in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with the Epidermal Growth Factor Cancer Vaccine. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 840–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. López-Castro, R.; García-Peña, T.; Mielgo-Rubio, X.; Riudavets, M.; Teixidó, C.; Vilariño, N.; Couñago, F.; Mezquita, L. Targeting molecular alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer: What’s next? Per. Med. 2022, 19, 341–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Michelotti, A.; de Scordilli, M.; Bertoli, E.; De Carlo, E.; Del Conte, A.; Bearz, A. NSCLC as the Paradigm of Preci-sion Medicine at Its Finest: The Rise of New Druggable Molecular Targets for Advanced Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hui, R.; Garon, E.B.; Goldman, J.W.; Leighl, N.B.; Hellmann, M.D.; Patnaik, A.; Gandhi, L.; Eder, J.P.; Ahn, M.J.; Horn, L.; et al. Pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase 1 trial. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 874–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhou, Y.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, C.; Zhao, H.; Hong, S.; Zhang, L. First-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma and high PD-L1 expression: Pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemo-therapy. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Saxena, P.; Singh, P.K.; Malik, P.S.; Singh, N. Immunotherapy Alone or in Combination with Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020, 21, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lewis, D.R.; Check, D.P.; Caporaso, N.E.; Travis, W.D.; Devesa, S.S. US lung cancer trends by histologic type. Cancer 2014, 120, 2883–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Meza, R.; Meernik, C.; Jeon, J.; Cote, M.L. Lung Cancer Incidence Trends by Gender, Race and Histology in the United States, 1973–2010. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yu, M.; Feuer, E.J.; Cronin, K.A.; Caporaso, N.E. Use of multiple imputation to correct for bias in lung cancer in-cidence trends by histologic subtype. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2014, 23, 1546–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Haiman, C.A.; Stram, D.O.; Wilkens, L.R.; Pike, M.C.; Kolonel, L.N.; Henderson, B.E.; Le Marchand, L. Ethnic and Racial Differences in the Smoking-Related Risk of Lung Cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. A Kenfield, S.; Wei, E.K.; Stampfer, M.J.; A Rosner, B.; A Colditz, G. Comparison of aspects of smoking among the four histological types of lung cancer. Tob. Control. 2008, 17, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mangone, L.; Borciani, E.; Michiara, M.; Vicentini, M.; Carrozzi, G.; Mancuso, P.; Sacchettini, C.; Giorgi Rossi, P. I Tumori Nelle Province dell’Area Vasta Emilia Nord: Piacenza, Parma, Reggio Emilia e Modena: Anni 2013–2014; Associazione Italiana Registri Tumori: Modena, Italy, 2015; pp. 1–124. Available online: https://www.ausl.mo.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeAttachment.php/L/IT/D/3%252F3%252F4%252FD.c0a5c9fc018e517fa340/P/BLOB%3AID%3D31942/E/pdf?mode=download (accessed on 27 April 2023).
  35. Fritz, A.; Percy, C.; Jack, A.; Shanmugaratnam, K.; Sobin, L.; Parkin, D.; Whelan, S. (Eds.) International Classification of Disease for Oncology, 3rd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dickman, P.W.; Coviello, E. Estimating and Modeling Relative Survival. Stata J. 2015, 15, 186–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint Regression Program; Version 4.9.0.0.; March 2021; Statistical Research and Applications Branch, National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2021. Available online: https://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  38. O’Neil, M.E.; Henley, S.J.; Rohan, E.A.; Ellington, T.D.; Gallaway, M.S. Lung Cancer Incidence in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Counties—United States, 2007–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019, 68, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Guo, H.; Chang, Z.; Wu, J.; Li, W. Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in China: Who are faced with a great-er effect? Environ. Int. 2019, 132, 105077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Patel, M.I.; McKinley, M.; Cheng, I.; Haile, R.; Wakelee, H.; Gomez, S.L. Lung cancer incidence trends in California by race/ethnicity, histology, sex, and neighborhood socioeconomic status: An analysis spanning 28 years. Lung Cancer 2017, 108, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ramírez-Tirado, L.A.; Uribe-Ortíz, C.E.; Arrieta, O.; Tirado-Gómez, L.L. Lung cancer mortality and municipal marginalization in Mexico, 1998–2016. Salud Publica Mex. 2019, 61, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jung, K.J.; Jeon, C.; Jee, S.H. The effect of smoking on lung cancer: Ethnic differences and the smoking paradox. Epidemiol. Health 2016, 38, e2016060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zhang, Y.; Ren, J.-S.; Huang, H.-Y.; Shi, J.-F.; Li, N.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, M. International trends in lung cancer incidence from 1973 to 2007. Cancer Med. 2018, 7, 1479–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Lim, W.-Y.; Tan, C.S.; Loy, E.Y.; Prasad, R.O.; Seow, A.; Chia, K.S. Lung cancer incidence in Singapore: Ethnic and gender differences. Lung Cancer 2014, 84, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Henley, S.J.; Richards, T.B.; Underwood, J.M.; Eheman, C.R.; Plescia, M.; McAfee, T.A.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Lung cancer incidence trends among men and women--United States, 2005–2009. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014, 63, 1–5, Erratum in: MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 2014, 63, 45. [Google Scholar]
  46. Xia, W.; Yu, X.; Mao, Q.; Xia, W.; Wang, A.; Dong, G.; Chen, B.; Ma, W.; Xu, L.; Jiang, F. Improvement of survival for non-small cell lung cancer over time. OncoTargets Ther. 2017, 10, 4295–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Available online: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/passi/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  48. Borghaei, H.; Paz-Ares, L.; Horn, L.; Spigel, D.R.; Steins, M.; Ready, N.E.; Chow, L.Q.; Vokes, E.E.; Felip, E.; Holgado, E.; et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1627–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Available online: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/passi/dati/SmettereFumo?tab-container-1=tab1 (accessed on 31 May 2023).
  50. Di Noia, V.; D’aveni, A.; D’argento, E.; Rossi, S.; Ghirardelli, P.; Bortolotti, L.; Vavassori, V.; Bria, E.; Ceresoli, G. Treating disease progression with osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: Novel targeted agents and combination strategies. ESMO Open 2021, 6, 100280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 15 03187 g001 550
Figure 1. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Mortality Estimates Based on Data from Death Certificates and on Cancer Registry Recorded Mortality with Lung Cancer.
Figure 1. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Mortality Estimates Based on Data from Death Certificates and on Cancer Registry Recorded Mortality with Lung Cancer.
Cancers 15 03187 g001
Cancers 15 03187 g002 550
Figure 2. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) incidence and mortality trends among males and females. * APC is significantly different from zero at the alpha = 0.05 level.
Figure 2. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) incidence and mortality trends among males and females. * APC is significantly different from zero at the alpha = 0.05 level.
Cancers 15 03187 g002
Cancers 15 03187 g003 550
Figure 3. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Adenocarcinoma (A,B) and squamous cell carcinoma (C,D) incidence and mortality trends among males and females. * APC is significantly different from zero at the alpha = 0.05 level.
Figure 3. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Adenocarcinoma (A,B) and squamous cell carcinoma (C,D) incidence and mortality trends among males and females. * APC is significantly different from zero at the alpha = 0.05 level.
Cancers 15 03187 g003
Cancers 15 03187 g004 550
Figure 4. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) incidence and mortality trends among males and females. * APC is significantly different from zero at the alpha = 0.05 level.
Figure 4. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) incidence and mortality trends among males and females. * APC is significantly different from zero at the alpha = 0.05 level.
Cancers 15 03187 g004
Cancers 15 03187 g005 550
Figure 5. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2018. 2-Year survival trends in NSCLC (A,B) and SCLC (C,D) among males and females.
Figure 5. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2018. 2-Year survival trends in NSCLC (A,B) and SCLC (C,D) among males and females.
Cancers 15 03187 g005
Cancers 15 03187 g006 550
Figure 6. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Other morphologies of lung cancer incidence and mortality trends among males and females. * APC is significantly different from zero at the alpha = 0.05 level.
Figure 6. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Other morphologies of lung cancer incidence and mortality trends among males and females. * APC is significantly different from zero at the alpha = 0.05 level.
Cancers 15 03187 g006
Table
Table 1. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Number of new cases by sex, age, year of diagnosis, and method of diagnosis.
Table 1. Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Years 2001–2020. Number of new cases by sex, age, year of diagnosis, and method of diagnosis.
Small CellNon-Small CellOthersTotal
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
Overall876 (12.2)4038 (56.1)2283 (31.7)7197 (100.0)
Sex
Males596 (68.0)2867 (71.0)1641 (71.9)5104 (70.9)
Females280 (32.0)1171 (29.0)642 (28.1)2093 (29.1)
Age at diagnosis
15–5462 (7.1)332 (8.2)101 (4.4)495 (6.9)
55–64175 (20.0)847 (21.0)242 (10.6)1264 (17.6)
65–74330 (37.6)1489 (36.9)537 (23.5)2356 (32.7)
75+309 (35.3)1370 (33.9)1403 (61.5)3082 (42.8)
Year of diagnosis
2001–2005213 (24.3)690 (17.1)866 (37.9)1769 (24.6)
2006–2010219 (25.0)937 (23.2)652 (28.6)1808 (25.1)
2011–2015211 (24.1)1244 (30.8)379 (16.6)1834 (25.5)
2016–2020233 (26.6)1167 (28.9)386 (16.9)1786 (24.8)
Method of diagnosis
Histological684 (78.1)3373 (83.5)375 (16.4)4432 (61.6)
Cytological192 (21.9)660 (16.4)425 (18.6)1277 (17.7)
Clinical/instrumental0 (0.0)5 (0.1)1483 (65.0)1488 (20.7)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mangone, L.; Marinelli, F.; Bisceglia, I.; Zambelli, A.; Zanelli, F.; Pagano, M.; Alberti, G.; Morabito, F.; Pinto, C. Changes in the Histology of Lung Cancer in Northern Italy: Impact on Incidence and Mortality. Cancers 2023, 15, 3187. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123187

AMA Style

Mangone L, Marinelli F, Bisceglia I, Zambelli A, Zanelli F, Pagano M, Alberti G, Morabito F, Pinto C. Changes in the Histology of Lung Cancer in Northern Italy: Impact on Incidence and Mortality. Cancers. 2023; 15(12):3187. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123187

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mangone, Lucia, Francesco Marinelli, Isabella Bisceglia, Alessandro Zambelli, Francesca Zanelli, Maria Pagano, Giulia Alberti, Fortunato Morabito, and Carmine Pinto. 2023. "Changes in the Histology of Lung Cancer in Northern Italy: Impact on Incidence and Mortality" Cancers 15, no. 12: 3187. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123187

APA Style

Mangone, L., Marinelli, F., Bisceglia, I., Zambelli, A., Zanelli, F., Pagano, M., Alberti, G., Morabito, F., & Pinto, C. (2023). Changes in the Histology of Lung Cancer in Northern Italy: Impact on Incidence and Mortality. Cancers, 15(12), 3187. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123187

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop