Next Article in Journal
The Anti- and Pro-Tumorigenic Role of Microbiota and Its Role in Anticancer Therapeutic Strategies
Next Article in Special Issue
Increasing Dosage of Leucovorin Results in Pharmacokinetic and Gene Expression Differences When Administered as Two-Hour Infusion or Bolus Injection to Patients with Colon Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients: Results from a Large Contemporary Cohort
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Molecular Basis of HER2-Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Colorectal Cancer

Cancers 2023, 15(1), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010183
by Ayumu Yoshikawa 1 and Yoshiaki Nakamura 1,2,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Cancers 2023, 15(1), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010183
Submission received: 1 December 2022 / Revised: 22 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 28 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors performed a well-presented study.

I would like to recommend to add more information about HER2 kinase and receptor tyrosine kinases.

HER2 has no specific ligand and generally generate dimers with EGFR. Authors could also add some information about EGFR-HER2 dual targets in colorectal cancer.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In this article the “Molecular basis of HER2-targeted therapy for HER2-positive colorectal cancer” the authors have highlighted the role and updates on HER2-targeted therapy. The manuscript is well written and have provided the comprehensive insights however below are the minor observations that need to be addressed.

·         It would be decent if the authors could add some pictorial representations in supplement to their manuscript text.  

·         Abbreviations details is missing someplace at first use.

·         Conclusion is well written; we suggest to elaborate conclusion more in the front of future directions and urgent open gaps that need to be addressed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

work well set up and correct from a laboratory and clinical point of view. We should specify more and why even better recognizing Her-2 receptors we have not been able to have real therapeutic advantages. It is not clear why immunotherapy associations can be useful. The limits should be defined more and the poor successes given proper weight. I would say that a little more criticism is needed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop