Next Article in Journal
Tumor BRCA Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: Past and Future—Five-Years’ Single-Institution Experience of 762 Consecutive Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Lynch Syndrome: From Carcinogenesis to Prevention Interventions
Previous Article in Journal
Autophagy, Oxidative Stress and Cancer Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of BRCA Status on Reproductive Decision-Making and Self-Concept: A Mixed-Methods Study Informing the Development of Tailored Interventions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Intention to Inform Relatives, Rates of Cascade Testing, and Preference for Patient-Mediated Communication in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome: The Swiss CASCADE Cohort

Cancers 2022, 14(7), 1636; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071636
by Mahesh Sarki 1, Chang Ming 1, Souria Aissaoui 2,3, Nicole Bürki 4, Maria Caiata-Zufferey 5, Tobias Ephraim Erlanger 6, Rossella Graffeo-Galbiati 7, Karl Heinimann 8,9, Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz 4, Christian Monnerat 10, Nicole Probst-Hensch 11, Manuela Rabaglio 12, Ursina Zürrer-Härdi 13, Pierre Olivier Chappuis 14,15, Maria C. Katapodi 1,* and on behalf of the CASCADE Consortium
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2022, 14(7), 1636; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071636
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 16 March 2022 / Accepted: 21 March 2022 / Published: 23 March 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The clinical outcome and treatment of patients should be discussed in this manuscript. Will other homologous recombination or mismatch repair genes be analyzed. Also more information about the low response rate of children and grandchildren should be discussed. What will the the treatment outcome of these patients.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you to the authors for this interesting investigation into uptake of cascade genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer syndromes. This study provides some insight into areas of clinical improvement.

Approximately 40% of the relatives identified and consented to the study have not had genetic testing. Is there scope to provide some indication as to why they have chosen not to proceed with testing?

The authors have used the word "embrassed" on three occasions (lines 271, 339, 347) when I believe the word "embraced" should be substituted? 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop