Next Article in Journal
Sodium New Houttuyfonate Inhibits Cancer-Promoting Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Progression
Next Article in Special Issue
Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients: Results from a Large Contemporary Cohort
Previous Article in Journal
Proteome-Wide Identification of RNA-Dependent Proteins in Lung Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differences in Cancer-Specific Mortality after Trimodal Therapy for T2N0M0 Bladder Cancer according to Histological Subtype
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 24
10.3390/cancers14246110
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sex Remains Negative Prognostic Factor in Contemporary Cohort of High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

by
Konrad Bilski
1,*,
Mieszko Kozikowski
2,3,
Michał A. Skrzypczyk
1,
Aleksandra Dobruch
4,
Kees Hendricksen
5,
David D’Andrea
6,
Anna Katarzyna Czech
7 and
Jakub Dobruch
1
1
Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Independent Public Hospital of Professor W. Orlowski, 00-416 Warsaw, Poland
2
Polish Center of Advanced Urology, Department of Urology, St. Anne’s Hospital EMC, 05-500 Piaseczno, Poland
3
Department of Diagnostic Imaging—Quadia, 05-500 Piaseczno, Poland
4
Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
5
Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
6
Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, 1090 Vienna, Austria
7
Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-008 Cracow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(24), 6110; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246110
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 4 December 2022 / Accepted: 9 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urological Malignancies)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Bladder cancer remains the most common malignancy of urinary tract. Sex-related divergent outcomes in bladder cancer have been reported with controversial results. The aim of this multicenter, retrospective study was to assess sex-related diversities in clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with primary non-muscle-invasive high-risk bladder cancer. In our study, females diagnosed with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer had higher risk of disease recurrence when compared to their male counterparts, although the outcomes of men and women subjected to a second restaging transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (reTUR) and treated with adequate Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) are similar.

Abstract

Sex-specific differences in outcomes of patients diagnosed with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) have been reported with controversial findings. This study aims to investigate sex-specific diversities in the treatment and oncologic outcomes of primary HR-NMIBC in a multicenter setting. A multicenter retrospective analysis of 519 patients (388 men and 131 women) treated with transurethral resection (TUR) for primary HR-NMIBC was performed. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to investigate the association of clinico-pathologic features and generate hazard ratios (HRs). Second-look TUR (reTUR) was performed in 406 (78%) patients. A total of 218 (42%) of patients were subjected to an induction course of intravesical BCG (Bacillus Calmette–Guérin) plus maintenance therapy. The median follow-up was 44 months. Among the entire cohort, 238 (46%) and 86 patients (17%) had recurred and progressed to muscle-invasive disease (MIBC), respectively. Female sex was associated with increased risk of disease recurrence in the entire cohort: HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.48–2.55, p < 0.001 and HR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.39–2.60, p < 0.001 in univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. In patients subjected to reTUR and treated additionally with BCG, female sex was associated with increased risk of disease recurrence in univariate analysis (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.07–3.06, p = 0.03), but not in multivariate analysis (HR 1.99, 95% CI 0.98–4.02, p = 0.06). There was no difference between sexes with regard to disease progression. HR-NMIBC diagnosed in females is associated with higher risk of disease recurrence when compared to males.

1. Introduction

Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) remains one the most common malignancies worldwide. According to a GLOBOCAN report, in 2020, UBC was diagnosed in almost 550,000 patients and 200,000 succumbed to the disease. The incidence of UBC varies significantly among different geographical regions and age-standardized incidence is almost three times greater in more developed countries than in less developed areas [1]. There is a known association of patients’ sex with bladder cancer. While its incidence is approximately 3–4 times higher in male patients, females present with more advanced disease at first diagnosis and have, in general, less favorable prognosis [2]. A number of studies have investigated this sex-based difference and found, among other factors, delayed diagnosis, suboptimal management and disparate tumor biology as potential explanations [3,4]. At diagnosis, 75% of UBC cases are confined to the mucosa (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer—NMIBC), whereas the rest invades deeper layers of the bladder wall and/or have already formed metastases (muscle-invasive bladder cancer—MIBC) [5]. The latter portends dismal prognosis while the former, being highly variable, is further divided into four major prognostic subgroups. These include low (LRBC), intermediate (IRBC), high-risk (HRBC) and very high-risk lesions (VHRBC) [6]. VHRBC and HRBC remain potentially lethal diseases with the risk of death ranging from 5% to even 38% [7]. As such, in selected cases of HRBC and most of VHRBC, radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended. However, the standard HRBC management involves thorough transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) supplemented with a second restaging TUR (reTUR) and adjuvant intravesical instillations of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG). Given this complexity of HRBC management, the evidence concerning disparate outcomes between males and females remains inconclusive [8]. The aim of the study is to determine sex diversities in the treatment and oncologic outcomes of primary non-muscle-invasive high-risk bladder cancer in comprehensive, high-volume centers.

2. Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 519 patients diagnosed with primary high-risk NMIBC (T1, Ta high grade/G3, with or without concomitant Cis) at 5 high-volume, academic centers from 2010 to 2018. Due to retrospective nature of the study, follow-up was not standardized. Second-look transurethral resection (reTUR) within 6 weeks from primary TURBT was performed in the majority of cases (78%). In general, patients were evaluated with cystoscopy and urinary cytology every 3 months in the first two years and semi-annually afterwards. Imaging and upper urinary tract work-up was performed at urologist’s discretion. Adequate BCG is defined as at least five of six doses of induction BCG and two doses of maintenance. Recurrence was defined as any histologically proven UBC (low and high grade) while progression in case of higher stage or grade of NMIBC or MIBC during follow-up. Among those treated with BCG, failure was considered in the following scenarios: recurrent or persistent high-grade Ta/T1 tumors or Cis after adequate BCG or initial response after adequate BCG therapy, but subsequent recurrence within 6 months (high-grade tumors) of the last dose of BCG or muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer during follow-up. In case of MIBC during follow-up (including upstaging to MIBC at reTUR), radical cystectomy was performed with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in the majority of cases.
Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association of patients’ sex with characteristics of primary tumor (stage, grade, number of lesions, presence of Cis, LVI (lymphovascular invasion), invasion of prostatic urethra, quality of primary TUR (presence of detrusor muscle in TUR specimen), rates of reTUR and quality of BCG therapy (strains, dosage, number of instillations)). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional models were implemented to investigate the association of patients’ sex with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). All tests were two-sided, with a p-value ≤ 0.05 considered as statistically significant. Because of multiple comparisons and the potential risk of type I errors, findings should be interpreted as exploratory. Therefore, no adjustment for multiplicity was necessary.

3. Results

Characteristics of patients and tumors stratified by sex are shown in Table 1. There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of these characteristics between males and females.

3.1. Quality of Primary TURBT and the Risk of Disease Understaging at Primary TURBT

The presence of detrusor muscle in primary TURBT specimens was noted in similar rates in men and women (Table 1). reTUR was performed in similar rates of both males (n = 312; 80%) and females (n = 94; 72%), (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.70–1.30, p = 0.70). A total of 18 (4.6%) and 9 (6.9%) men and women, respectively, had MIBC at reTUR with no sex-specific differences (OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 0.54–7.59, p = 0.22).

3.2. BCG Response

Among those subjected to BCG, failure during follow-up was observed in 51% of cases (57% and 49% for women and men, respectively). There was no difference in overall rate of BCG failure (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 0.09–64.05, p = 0.37) and BCG failure-free survival (p = 0.11) between sexes.

3.3. Radical Cystectomy

Radical cystectomy was performed in 84 patients (16%), (24% of women and 14% of men) with no sex-specific differences (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.86–4.61, p = 0.08).

3.4. Disease Recurrence

With a median follow-up of 44 months, 238 (46%) patients experienced disease recurrence. Median recurrence-free survival was 14 months (95% CI = 12–16) with 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival of 65%, 49% and 43%, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, female sex was associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence in the entire cohort in univariate and multivariate analysis: HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.48–2.55, p < 0.001 and HR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.39–2.60, p < 0.001, respectively. In patients subjected to reTUR and adequate adjuvant intravesical instillations of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG), female sex was associated with higher rate of recurrence in univariate analysis (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.07–3.06, p = 0.03) but not in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.98–4.02, p = 0.06) (Table 2a,b). Figure 1a,b shows Kaplan–Meier distributions of recurrence-free survival according to sex in the entire cohort and in the subgroup subjected to reTUR and adequate BCG.

3.5. Disease Progression

Of the 86 (17%) patients who progressed, 57 (15%) were men and 29 (23%) were women. Median progression-free survival was 32 months (95% CI = 28–34) with 1-, 3- and 5-year progression-free survival rates of 89%, 83% and 79%. In the entire cohort, LVI (HR = 3.57, 95% CI = 2.15–5.94, p < 0.001) was a significant predictor of progression in univariate analysis, while concomitant Cis (HR = 1.75 95% CI = 1.03–2.95 p = 0.04) and LVI (HR = 3.36, 95% CI = 1.97–5.71, p < 0.001) remained significant in multivariate analysis. In patients subjected to reTUR and adequate adjuvant instillations of BCG, the only significant predictor of disease progression was LVI with HR = 2.99 (95% CI = 1.27–7.06, p = 0.01) and HR = 2.71 (95% CI = 1.03–7.13, p = 0.04) in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively (Table 2c,d). Figure 1c,d shows Kaplan–Meier distributions of progression-free survival according to sex in the entire cohort and in the subgroup subjected to reTUR and subsequent adequate BCG.

4. Discussion

Among numerous studies, sex remains one of the most significant negative prognostic features in UBC [9,10,11,12,13,14]. The association is explained by delayed diagnosis, suboptimal management and diverse biology between sexes [15]. According to some research, the sex gap disappears if comprehensive risk factor adjustment is provided [14,16]. However, intricate diagnosis and treatment complexity of high-risk bladder cancer may hamper the recognition of all potential confounders. Our study adds evidence suggesting that females with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in high-volume clinics with modern, up-to-date management experience greater cancer recurrence risk than their male counterparts.
A number of authors revealed an increased risk of disease recurrence or progression in women treated with transurethral resection of the bladder tumor with adjuvant intravesical immunotherapy [13,14,16,17,18]. Amongst trials acknowledged by the CUETO group, a single-institution retrospective analysis of 146 Spanish patients with T1HG bladder cancer treated with BCG confirmed the hypothesis [13]. Variable “female gender” was associated in multivariate analysis with significantly increased risks of recurrence, progression and death from bladder cancer. However, as patients in this series did not undergo reTUR and did not receive maintenance BCG, the generalizability of the findings were widely contested. Another retrospective analysis of 916 patients diagnosed with T1 UBC showed that women were at significantly greater risk of disease recurrence. Furthermore, in this study, among patients treated with induction BCG, the authors did not reveal association between sex and risk of disease recurrence (41). In several recently published studies, authors did not report association between sex and disease progression, recurrence or cancer-specific mortality risk [16,17,18,19,20]. However, restaging TUR was performed in every case in the latter series, whereas in the previous one, reTUR was not uniformly performed; therefore, conclusions are still uncertain.
It could be that urologists faced with the very thin bladder wall in women tend to restrict the depth and the extent of their transurethral surgery. This could be the case for less experienced residents, for whom bladder tumor resection consistently appears to be the first step in their surgical education. Thus, one of the most important factors at the time of TURBT is whether detrusor muscle (muscularis propria) was collected. Its presence in the specimen, according to EAU (European Association of Urology) guidelines, is of utmost importance, particularly in high-grade disease. When the tumor appears to be completely resected, presence of detrusor muscle in the TURBT specimen is a suitable surrogate marker of the quality of resection. It has been recognized that women are at higher risk of detrusor muscle absence than men [21]. At the same time, the presence of detrusor muscle in tumor resections is associated with a lower risk of early recurrence [22]. In our study, rates of muscle tissue in primary resection specimens were greater in males (74%) than in females (56%). Although the difference did not reach the defined level of significance, the risk of muscle-invasive disease at reTUR remained low and comparable between sexes. Furthermore, patients with residual disease at reTUR have higher risks of recurrence and progression in comparison with patients with no residual disease [23]. In our group, residual disease at reTUR was noted in 118 (38%) men and 41 (44%) women, with no sex-specific differences (p = 0.63).
Prompt surgery followed by complete reTUR and BCG may narrow the UBC sex gap. In the study by Boorjian et al. regarding 1021 patients subjected to reTUR (756 men and 265 women) and induction BCG for NMIBC, sex was not associated with risk of disease recurrence or progression [16]. Similar findings were provided by Holz et al., with NMIBC patients subjected to adjuvant induction followed by maintenance BCG [24]. However, in the former study, maintenance instillations were omitted and within the latter one, only a minority of patients underwent reTUR. The vast majority of our cohort received at least seven BCG instillations and only a few omitted a second resection. The definition of adequate BCG therapy has been recently acknowledged. It is fulfilled if at least five out of six induction intravesical instillations and at least two additional ones are delivered [25]. Such adjuvant therapy has been suggested to evoke similar responses in male patients as well as in female patients [26]. An analysis of 541 patients including 111 (20.5%) women and 430 (79.5%) men treated with adequate BCG revealed comparable recurrence-free and progression-free survival. However, one-quarter of patients had low- or intermediate-risk disease and 15% had no reTUR [26]. Therefore, following suggestions of diverse sex-related response to BCG by other authors, including Palou et al., we strongly believe that sex disparities in cancer biology and tumor–host relationships should be sought for [13].
Apart from sex, several histological features of resected bladder tumors have been proven to predict worse outcome. Traditionally, Cis has been considered the worst prognostic factor in T1 high-grade tumors. The study performed by Gontero et al. confirmed an increased risk of progression in Cis cases treated with BCG therapy [18]. In our analysis, concomitant Cis increased the risk of disease progression in the entire cohort, but when the analysis was limited to those with reTUR and adequate BCG, Cis lost its prognostic value, probably due to the low number of events.
In our study, no differences in progression and recurrence rate related to tumor stage and grade were found. This could be due to the inclusion criteria of a substantial number of patients with T1 low-grade bladder cancer (28% of entire cohort). In a retrospective analysis of patients with Ta high-grade UBC long-term risk of disease, progression and recurrence were similar to those with T1 tumors (including low- and high-grade tumors) [27]. Furthermore, analyzing the risk of disease progression after BCG immunotherapy, Bree et al. support consideration of all high-grade UBC as the high-risk group of NMIBC regardless of stage [28]. Since the application of the WHO 2004/2016 bladder cancer grading system, the proportion of T1 UBC diagnoses documented as low-grade has declined significantly but still varies widely by institution. Furthermore, several studies have shown that patients with T1 low-grade UBC experienced similar outcomes when compared to those with T1 high-grade UBC, suggesting that the role of T1 grading of UBC remains questionable [29,30,31]. Staging T1 UBC can be challenging. Recently, substaging based on muscularis mucosae invasion has been proposed, but has not yet been generally incorporated [32,33]. Future studies are needed to validate T1 UBC subtypes and to determine their significance.
Another negative prognostic factor, observed first by Lopez et al. in TURBT specimens, is lymphovascular invasion (LVI) [34]. It occurs in 10–25% of T1 tumors [35]. More recent studies confirm its significance in the prediction of progression and incidence of metastasis [36,37]. Information on LVI in TURBT specimens is not always included in histopathological reports hampering its use in the decision-making process. In a recently published study, presence of LVI independently predicts poor oncological outcomes in patients with HR-NMIBC [38]. This information may prompt practitioners to counsel patients on whether to choose a bladder-preserving management or radical cystectomy. Furthermore, among patients subjected to radical cystectomy, the oncological results predicted by LVI were close to those predicted by lymph node metastases [39]. Kluth et al. did not reveal sex-related differences in cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy in LVI-positive patients [12]. In our cohort, LVI was detected in 42 (8%) patients. It independently predicted disease progression in both the entire cohort and in patients subjected to reTUR and adequate adjuvant BCG.
Overall, sex-specific discrepancies in outcomes of bladder cancer seem to be multifactorial, comprising molecular, physiological and anatomic features, heterogeneous exposure and responses to carcinogens, as well as treatment-dependent factors. We acknowledge several limitations of our study, mostly those owing to its retrospective design. This type of investigation may lead to selection bias resulting from the lack of control over confounding effects which might be omitted unwittingly. We were unable to include data on history of smoking and environmental exposure, BMI, delay in diagnosis and experience of operating team. Lack of central pathology could lead to underestimation of the true incidence of variant histology which may result in worse prognosis. Finally, we did not evaluate comorbidities, which might have influenced the decision-making process regarding selection of optimal surgical therapy. Despite these shortcomings, our results indicate the existence of sex differences in high-risk urothelial bladder cancer.

5. Conclusions

High-risk urothelial bladder cancer diagnosed in females is associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence when compared to their male counterparts, although the outcomes of men and women subjected to reTUR and treated with adequate BCG are similar. Further research is necessary to understand and close the sex gap in UBC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.B. and J.D.; writing—original draft preparation, K.B. and J.D.; writing—review and editing, K.B., M.K., M.A.S., A.D., K.H., D.D., A.K.C. and J.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Center (NCN), grant number 2019/33/B/NZ5/02447.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education (125/PB/2018; 7 November 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cumberbatch, M.G.K.; Jubber, I.; Black, P.C.; Esperto, F.; Figueroa, J.D.; Kamat, A.M.; Kiemeney, L.; Lotan, Y.; Pang, K.; Silverman, D.T.; et al. Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Contemporary Update of Risk Factors in 2018. Eur. Urol. 2018, 74, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Fajkovic, H.; Halpern, J.A.; Cha, E.K.; Bahadori, A.; Chromecki, T.F.; Karakiewicz, P.I.; Breinl, E.; Merseburger, A.S.; Shariat, S.F. Impact of gender on bladder cancer incidence, staging, and prognosis. World J. Urol. 2011, 29, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dobruch, J.; Daneshmand, S.; Fisch, M.; Lotan, Y.; Noon, A.P.; Resnick, M.J.; Shariat, S.F.; Zlotta, A.R.; Boorjian, S.A. Gender and Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Review of Etiology, Biology, and Outcomes. Eur. Urol. 2016, 69, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Krimphove, M.J.; Szymaniak, J.; Marchese, M.; Tully, K.H.; D’Andrea, D.; Mossanen, M.; Lipsitz, S.R.; Kilbridge, K.; Kibel, A.S.; Kluth, L.A.; et al. Sex-specific Differences in the Quality of Treatment of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Do Not Explain the Overall Survival Discrepancy. Eur. Urol. Focus 2021, 7, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Burger, M.; Catto, J.W.F.; Dalbagni, G.; Grossman, H.B.; Herr, H.; Karakiewicz, P.; Kassouf, W.; Kiemeney, L.A.; La Vecchia, C.; Shariat, S.; et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 2013, 63, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sylvester, R.J.; Rodríguez, O.; Hernández, V.; Turturica, D.; Bauerová, L.; Bruins, H.M.; Bründl, J.; van der Kwast, T.H.; Brisuda, A.; Rubio-Briones, J.; et al. European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel. Eur. Urol. 2021, 79, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. van den Bosch, S.; Alfred Witjes, J. Long-term cancer-specific survival in patients with high-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and tumour progression: A systematic review. Eur. Urol. 2011, 60, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. D’Andrea, D.; Soria, F.; Grotenhuis, A.J.; Cha, E.K.; Malats, N.; di Stasi, S.; Joniau, S.; Cai, T.; van Rhijn, B.W.G.; Irani, J.; et al. Association of patients’ sex with treatment outcomes after intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy for T1G3/HG bladder cancer. World J. Urol. 2021, 39, 3337–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Otto, W.; May, M.; Fritsche, H.-M.; Dragun, D.; Aziz, A.; Gierth, M.; Trojan, L.; Herrmann, E.; Moritz, R.; Ellinger, J.; et al. Analysis of sex differences in cancer-specific survival and perioperative mortality following radical cystectomy: Results of a large German multicenter study of nearly 2500 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Gend. Med. 2012, 9, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tilki, D.; Reich, O.; Svatek, R.S.; Karakiewicz, P.I.; Kassouf, W.; Novara, G.; Ficarra, V.; Chade, D.C.; Fritsche, H.-M.; Gerwens, N.; et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with clinical carcinoma in situ only treated with radical cystectomy: An international study of 243 patients. J. Urol. 2010, 183, 1757–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Messer, J.C.; Shariat, S.F.; Dinney, C.P.; Novara, G.; Fradet, Y.; Kassouf, W.; Karakiewicz, P.I.; Fritsche, H.-M.; Izawa, J.I.; Lotan, Y.; et al. Female gender is associated with a worse survival after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A competing risk analysis. Urology 2014, 83, 863–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kluth, L.A.; Rieken, M.; Xylinas, E.; Kent, M.; Rink, M.; Rouprêt, M.; Sharifi, N.; Jamzadeh, A.; Kassouf, W.; Kaushik, D.; et al. Gender-specific differences in clinicopathologic outcomes following radical cystectomy: An international multi-institutional study of more than 8000 patients. Eur. Urol. 2014, 66, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Palou, J.; Sylvester, R.J.; Faba, O.R.; Parada, R.; Peña, J.A.; Algaba, F.; Villavicencio, H. Female gender and carcinoma in situ in the prostatic urethra are prognostic factors for recurrence, progression, and disease-specific mortality in T1G3 bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Eur. Urol. 2012, 62, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fernandez-Gomez, J.; Solsona, E.; Unda, M.; Martinez-Piñeiro, L.; Gonzalez, M.; Hernandez, R.; Madero, R.; Ojea, A.; Pertusa, C.; Rodriguez-Molina, J.; et al. Prognostic factors in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin: Multivariate analysis of data from four randomized CUETO trials. Eur. Urol. 2008, 53, 992–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marks, P.; Soave, A.; Shariat, S.F.; Fajkovic, H.; Fisch, M.; Rink, M. Female with bladder cancer: What and why is there a difference? Transl. Androl. Urol. 2016, 5, 668–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Boorjian, S.A.; Zhu, F.; Herr, H.W. The effect of gender on response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for patients with non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. BJU Int. 2010, 106, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kluth, L.A.; Fajkovic, H.; Xylinas, E.; Crivelli, J.J.; Passoni, N.; Rouprêt, M.; Becker, A.; Comploj, E.; Pycha, A.; Holmang, S.; et al. Female gender is associated with higher risk of disease recurrence in patients with primary T1 high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. World J. Urol. 2013, 31, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gontero, P.; Sylvester, R.; Pisano, F.; Joniau, S.; Vander Eeckt, K.; Serretta, V.; Larré, S.; Di Stasi, S.; van Rhijn, B.; Witjes, A.J.; et al. Prognostic factors and risk groups in T1G3 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients initially treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin: Results of a retrospective multicenter study of 2451 patients. Eur. Urol. 2015, 67, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Soave, A.; Dahlem, R.; Hansen, J.; Weisbach, L.; Minner, S.; Engel, O.; Kluth, L.A.; Chun, F.K.; Shariat, S.F.; Fisch, M.; et al. Gender-specific outcomes of bladder cancer patients: A stage-specific analysis in a contemporary, homogenous radical cystectomy cohort. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 41, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mitra, A.P.; Skinner, E.C.; Schuckman, A.K.; Quinn, D.I.; Dorff, T.B.; Daneshmand, S. Effect of gender on outcomes following radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A critical analysis of 1,994 patients. Urol. Oncol. 2014, 32, 52.e1–52.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Herkommer, K.; Hofer, C.; Gschwend, J.E.; Kron, M.; Treiber, U. Gender and body mass index as risk factors for bladder perforation during primary transurethral resection of bladder tumors. J. Urol. 2012, 187, 1566–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fan, J.; Zhang, X.; Fan, J.; Li, L.; He, D.; Wu, K. Risk Stratification for the Rate and Location of Residual Bladder Tumor for the Decision of Re-Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 788568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Herr, H.W. Role of re-resection in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Sci. World J. 2011, 11, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Holz, S.; Albisinni, S.; Gilsoul, J.; Pirson, M.; Duthie, V.; Quackels, T.; Vanden Bossche, M.; Roumeguère, T. Risk factor assessment in high-risk, bacillus Calmette–Guérin-treated, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Res. Rep. Urol. 2017, 9, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kamat, A.M.; Sylvester, R.J.; Böhle, A.; Palou, J.; Lamm, D.L.; Brausi, M.; Soloway, M.; Persad, R.; Buckley, R.; Colombel, M.; et al. Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 1935–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bree, K.K.; Hensley, P.J.; Brooks, N.; Matulay, J.; Nogueras-Gonzalez, G.M.; Navai, N.; Dinney, C.P.; Kamat, A.M. Impact of sex on response to BCG in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients: A contemporary review from a tertiary care center. World J. Urol. 2021, 39, 4143–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Herr, H.W. Tumor progression and survival of patients with high grade, noninvasive papillary (TaG3) bladder tumors: 15-year outcome. J. Urol. 2000, 163, 60–61, discussion 61–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bree, K.K.; Hensley, P.J.; Lobo, N.; Brooks, N.A.; Nogueras-Gonzalez, G.M.; Guo, C.C.; Navai, N.; Grossman, H.B.; Dinney, C.P.; Kamat, A.M. All High-Grade Ta Tumors Should Be Classified as High Risk: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Response in High-Grade Ta Tumors. J. Urol. 2022, 208, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Amin, M.B.; Smith, S.C.; Reuter, V.E.; Epstein, J.I.; Grignon, D.J.; Hansel, D.E.; Lin, O.; McKenney, J.K.; Montironi, R.; Paner, G.P.; et al. Update for the practicing pathologist: The International Consultation on Urologic Disease-European association of urology consultation on bladder cancer. Mod. Pathol. 2015, 28, 612–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cao, D.; Vollmer, R.T.; Luly, J.; Jain, S.; Roytman, T.M.; Ferris, C.W.; Hudson, M.A. Comparison of 2004 and 1973 World Health Organization grading systems and their relationship to pathologic staging for predicting long-term prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Urology 2010, 76, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Otto, W.; Denzinger, S.; Fritsche, H.-M.; Burger, M.; Wieland, W.F.; Hofstädter, F.; Hartmann, A.; Bertz, S. The WHO classification of 1973 is more suitable than the WHO classification of 2004 for predicting survival in pT1 urothelial bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2011, 107, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kardoust Parizi, M.; Enikeev, D.; Glybochko, P.V.; Seebacher, V.; Janisch, F.; Fajkovic, H.; Chłosta, P.L.; Shariat, S.F. Prognostic value of T1 substaging on oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. World J. Urol. 2020, 38, 1437–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. de Jong, F.C.; Hoedemaeker, R.F.; Kvikstad, V.; Mensink, J.T.M.; de Jong, J.J.; Boevé, E.R.; van der Schoot, D.K.E.; Zwarthoff, E.C.; Boormans, J.L.; Zuiverloon, T.C.M. T1 Substaging of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer is Associated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin Failure and Improves Patient Stratification at Diagnosis. J. Urol. 2021, 205, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lopez, J.I.; Angulo, J.C. The prognostic significance of vascular invasion in stage T1 bladder cancer. Histopathology 1995, 27, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fukumoto, K.; Kikuchi, E.; Mikami, S.; Miyajima, A.; Oya, M. Lymphovascular invasion status at transurethral resection of bladder tumors may predict subsequent poor response of T1 tumors to bacillus Calmette-Guérin. BMC Urol. 2016, 16, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tilki, D.; Shariat, S.F.; Lotan, Y.; Rink, M.; Karakiewicz, P.I.; Schoenberg, M.P.; Lerner, S.P.; Sonpavde, G.; Sagalowsky, A.I.; Gupta, A. Lymphovascular invasion is independently associated with bladder cancer recurrence and survival in patients with final stage T1 disease and negative lymph nodes after radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2013, 111, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yoneda, K.; Kamiya, N.; Utsumi, T.; Wakai, K.; Oka, R.; Endo, T.; Yano, M.; Hiruta, N.; Ichikawa, T.; Suzuki, H. Impact of Lymphovascular Invasion on Prognosis in the Patients with Bladder Cancer—Comparison of Transurethral Resection and Radical Cystectomy. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ukai, R.; Hashimoto, K.; Nakayama, H.; Iwamoto, T. Lymphovascular invasion predicts poor prognosis in high-grade pT1 bladder cancer patients who underwent transurethral resection in one piece. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 47, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yuk, H.D.; Jeong, C.W.; Kwak, C.; Kim, H.H.; Ku, J.H. Lymphovascular invasion have a similar prognostic value as lymph node involvement in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urothelial carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 14 06110 g001 550
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier plot of recurrence-free survival stratified by sex in entire cohort (a); recurrence-free survival stratified by sex in patients subjected to reTUR and subsequent adequate BCG (b); progression-free survival stratified by sex in entire cohort (c); progression-free survival stratified by sex in patients subjected to reTUR and subsequent BCG (d). TURBT = transurethral resection of the bladder tumor.
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier plot of recurrence-free survival stratified by sex in entire cohort (a); recurrence-free survival stratified by sex in patients subjected to reTUR and subsequent adequate BCG (b); progression-free survival stratified by sex in entire cohort (c); progression-free survival stratified by sex in patients subjected to reTUR and subsequent BCG (d). TURBT = transurethral resection of the bladder tumor.
Cancers 14 06110 g001
Table
Table 1. Clinical and tumor characteristics of 519 patients treated with transurethral resection (TUR).
Table 1. Clinical and tumor characteristics of 519 patients treated with transurethral resection (TUR).
VariableMenWomenp-Value
Number of patients388 (75%)131 (25%)NA
Age at primary TUR (mean)69700.27
Follow-up (months)44430.65
pTstage 0.20
Ta17 (4%)10 (8%)
T1363 (94%)118 (90%)
Tx8 (2%)3 (2%)
Muscle presence at TURBT 0.78
Present287 (74%)74 (56%)
Absent101 (26%)57 (44%)
Grade 0.48
High291 (75%)91 (69%)
Low97 (25%)40 (31%)
Tumor diameter (<3 cm/>3 cm) 0.78
<3 cm197 (51%)69 (53%)
>3 cm191 (49%)62 (47%)
Number of tumors 0.57
Single233 (60%)77 (59%)
Multiple155 (40%)54 (41%)
Concomitant Cis106 (27%)29 (22%)0.49
LVI31 (8%)11 (8%)0.93
ReTUR312 (80%)94 (72%)0.70
Adequate BCG155 (40%)63 (48%)0.75
Recurrence156 (40%)82 (63%)0.22
Progression57 (15%)29 (22%)0.25
NA = non-available; TURBT = transurethral resection of the bladder tumor; pTstage = pathological tumor stage; cm = centimeter; Cis = carcinoma in situ; LVI = lymphovascular invasion; reTUR = restaging transurethral resection of the bladder; BCG = Bacillus Calmette–Guérin.
Table
Table 2. Multivariableand univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses of variables associated with HR-NMIBC: recurrence risk in entire cohort (a); recurrence risk in patients subjected to reTUR and subsequent adequate BCG (b); progression risk in entire cohort (c); progression risk in patients subjected to reTUR and subsequent adequate BCG (d).
Table 2. Multivariableand univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses of variables associated with HR-NMIBC: recurrence risk in entire cohort (a); recurrence risk in patients subjected to reTUR and subsequent adequate BCG (b); progression risk in entire cohort (c); progression risk in patients subjected to reTUR and subsequent adequate BCG (d).
UnivariateMultivariate
FactorHR (95% CI)p-ValueHR (95% CI)p-Value
Age at TURBT0.99 (0.98–1.01)0.401.00 (0.98–1.01)0.20
Grade at TURBT (high vs. low)1.00 (0.73 -136)0.981.05 (0.63–1.44)0.81
Muscle presence (yes vs. now)0.90 (0.68–1.19)0.450.96 (0.76–1.43)0.79
T stage from TURBT (T1 vs. Ta)1.06 (0.66–1.70)0.811.07 (0.57–1.53)0.78
Tumor size (<3 cm vs. >3 cm)0.99 (0.78–1.31)0.940.97 (0.77–1.38)0.85
Concomitant Cis (yes vs. no)1.08 (0.80–1.44)0.621.10 (0.79–1.54)0.56
LVI (yes vs. no)1.45 (0.97–2.22)0.071.59 (1.04–2.43)0.03
Sex (female vs. male)1.94 (1.48–2.55)<0.0011.91 (1.39–2.60)<0.001
(a)
UnivariateMultivariate
FactorHR (95% CI)p-ValueHR (95% CI)p-Value
Age at TURBT1.02 (0.96–1.01)0.151.00 (0.96–1.05)0.93
Grade at TURBT (high vs. low)1.20 (0.43–3.32)0.734.37 (0.54–3.99)0.99
Muscle presence (yes vs. no)0.90 (0.52–1.54)0.690.92 (0.50–1.68)0.78
T stage from TURBT (T1 vs. Ta)1.08 (0.40–2.16)0.861.68 (0.25–1.44)0.25
Tumor size (<3 cm vs. >3 cm)0.73 (0.81–2.32)0.230.64 (0.86–2.88)0.14
Concomitant Cis (yes vs. no)1.30 (0.77–2.19)0.321.45 (0.81–2.61)0.21
LVI (yes vs. no)1.38 (0.69–2.75)0.361.06 (0.49–2.30)0.88
Sex (female vs. male)1.81 (1.07–3.06)0.031.99 (0.98–4.02)0.06
(b)
UnivariateMultivariate
FactorHR (95% CI)p-ValueHR (95% CI)p-Value
Age at TURBT1.02 (0.99–1.04)0.151.02 (0.99–1.04)0.22
Grade at TURBT (high vs. low)1.42 (0.79–2.53)0.241.06 (0.49–2.27)0.89
Muscle presence (yes vs. now)0.69 (0.44–1.09)0.110.75 (0.45–1.24)0.26
T stage from TURBT (T1 vs. Ta)1.05 (0.48–2.29)0.911.05 (0.46–2.40)0.91
Tumor size (<3 cm vs. >3 cm)1.53 (0.99–2.37)0.0541.55 (0.95–2.52)0.08
Concomitant Cis (yes vs. no)1.53 (0.97–2.42)0.071.75 (1.03–2.95)0.04
LVI (yes vs. no)3.57 (2.15–5.94)<0.0013.36 (1.97–5.71)<0.001
Sex (female vs. male)0.73 (0.72–2.62)0.341.38 (0.82–2.32)0.23
(c)
UnivariateMultivariate
FactorHR (95% CI)p-ValueHR (95% CI)p-Value
Age at TURBT1.01 (0.96–1.03)0.631.00 (0.96–1.05)0.93
Grade at TURBT (high vs. low)1.32 (0.83–14.13)0.991.04 (0.54–3.99)0.99
Muscle presence (yes vs. now)1.84 (0.23–1.26)0.161.78 (0.22–1.38)0.20
T stage from TURBT (T1 vs. Ta)0.63 (0.54–4.77)0.401.57 (0.47–5.30)0.46
Tumor size (<3 cm vs. >3 cm)0.53 (0.82–4.23)0.142.03 (080–5.17)0.14
Concomitant Cis (yes vs. no)1.45 (0.65–3.25)0.361.61 (0.65–4.00)0.30
LVI (yes vs. no)2.99 (1.27–7.06)0.012.71 (1.03–7.13)0.04
Sex (female vs. male)1.56 (0.70–3.48)0.281.09 (0.33–2.52)0.87
(d)
TURBT = transurethral resection of the bladder tumor; T stage = tumor stage; cm = centimeter; Cis = carcinoma in situ; LVI = lymphovascular invasion; reTUR = restaging transurethral resection of the bladder.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bilski, K.; Kozikowski, M.; Skrzypczyk, M.A.; Dobruch, A.; Hendricksen, K.; D’Andrea, D.; Czech, A.K.; Dobruch, J. Sex Remains Negative Prognostic Factor in Contemporary Cohort of High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246110

AMA Style

Bilski K, Kozikowski M, Skrzypczyk MA, Dobruch A, Hendricksen K, D’Andrea D, Czech AK, Dobruch J. Sex Remains Negative Prognostic Factor in Contemporary Cohort of High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers. 2022; 14(24):6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246110

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bilski, Konrad, Mieszko Kozikowski, Michał A. Skrzypczyk, Aleksandra Dobruch, Kees Hendricksen, David D’Andrea, Anna Katarzyna Czech, and Jakub Dobruch. 2022. "Sex Remains Negative Prognostic Factor in Contemporary Cohort of High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer" Cancers 14, no. 24: 6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246110

APA Style

Bilski, K., Kozikowski, M., Skrzypczyk, M. A., Dobruch, A., Hendricksen, K., D’Andrea, D., Czech, A. K., & Dobruch, J. (2022). Sex Remains Negative Prognostic Factor in Contemporary Cohort of High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers, 14(24), 6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246110

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop