Next Article in Journal
Homologous Recombination Deficiency and Cyclin E1 Amplification Are Correlated with Immune Cell Infiltration and Survival in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Insight into Drug Resistance Mechanism Conferred by Aberrant PIK3CD Splice Variant in African American Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced and Progressing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Retrospective Multicenter Experience
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 23
10.3390/cancers14235967
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Splicing-Disrupting Mutations in Inherited Predisposition to Solid Pediatric Cancer

by
Piedad Alba-Pavón
1,
Lide Alaña
1,
Itziar Astigarraga
1,2,3 and
Olatz Villate
1,*
1
Pediatric Oncology Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
2
Pediatric Service, Hospital Universitario Cruces, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
3
Pediatric Department, Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(23), 5967; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235967
Submission received: 17 October 2022 / Revised: 25 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 2 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Alternative Splicing in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Until recently, the prevalence of hereditary cancer in children was estimated to be very low. However, recent studies suggest that at least 10% of pediatric cancer patients have a germline mutation in a cancer predisposition gene. It has been shown that most of these mutations affect splicing, a process by which different transcripts of the same gene are produced. The splicing process is very important, as it regulates many aspects of cellular proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Hereditary cancer genes are highly prone to splicing alterations, and among them there are several genes that may contribute to the development of pediatric solid tumors when mutated in the germline. In this review, we analyze the importance of the splicing-disrupting mutations in pediatric solid cancer and inherited predisposition syndromes. The therapies developed to correct aberrant splicing in cancer are also discussed.

Abstract

The prevalence of hereditary cancer in children was estimated to be very low until recent studies suggested that at least 10% of pediatric cancer patients carry a germline mutation in a cancer predisposition gene. A significant proportion of pathogenic variants associated with an increased risk of hereditary cancer are variants affecting splicing. RNA splicing is an essential process involved in different cellular processes such as proliferation, survival, and differentiation, and alterations in this pathway have been implicated in many human cancers. Hereditary cancer genes are highly susceptible to splicing mutations, and among them there are several genes that may contribute to pediatric solid tumors when mutated in the germline. In this review, we have focused on the analysis of germline splicing-disrupting mutations found in pediatric solid tumors, as the discovery of pathogenic splice variants in pediatric cancer is a growing field for the development of personalized therapies. Therapies developed to correct aberrant splicing in cancer are also discussed as well as the options to improve the diagnostic yield based on the increase in the knowledge in splicing.

1. Alternative Splicing

Alternative splicing (AS) is a key mechanism that allows a single gene to increase its coding capacity, enabling the synthesis of distinct mRNA and protein [1]. AS determines many aspects of cellular proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Taking into account the importance of the splicing process in gene regulation, it is not surprising that alterations in this pathway have been implicated in several human cancers [2]. Analyses of more than 8000 tumors across 32 cancer types have revealed thousands of splicing variants not present in normal tissues, which are likely to generate cancer-specific markers and neoantigens [3,4]. The knowledge of the relationship between AS and epigenetic modifications has also enlarged the collection of biomarkers that can be used as cancer diagnostic and/or prognostic tools [5]. Moreover, aberrant splicing variants conferring drug or therapy resistance in tumors are more common than previously estimated [6].
The majority of studies on cancer and splicing have focused on the impact of somatic variants on alternative splicing events [3,7], but the association between splicing and germline variants in cancer predisposition genes is often overlooked. The discovery of pathogenic splice variants in pediatric cancer is a growing field that needs further investigation.

2. Cancer Predisposition Genes

Cancer predisposition genes are those in which germline mutations confer highly or moderately increased risks of developing neoplasms. The identification of these genes and the pathogenic variants found in them is essential for diagnosis and personalized treatment [8]. Thanks to the advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS), new cancer predisposition genes and pathogenic variants are being identified in pediatric tumors.
The prevalence of hereditary cancer in children was generally estimated to be very low until recent studies suggested that at least 10% of pediatric cancer patients carry a germline mutation in a cancer predisposition gene [9,10]. A significant proportion of the pathogenic variants associated with an increased risk of hereditary cancer are variants affecting splicing [11]. The identification of the variants that disrupt AS remains a challenge, and the consequence is that a significant proportion of patients with a possible hereditary cancer syndrome remain without a definitive molecular diagnosis. In a recent study of somatic mutations across 8656 tumor samples, the authors reported 1964 mutations that had originally been incorrectly classified and had clear evidence of creating alternative splice junctions [12].
It has recently been reported that hereditary cancer genes are highly susceptible to splicing mutations and that three main genes responsible for Lynch Syndrome, MLH1, MSH2, and PMS2, belong to a class of 86 disease genes that are enriched for splicing mutations [13]. It was also found that the COSMIC set of cancer genes [14] were overrepresented in these 86 splice-mutation-prone genes, with 20 of them being cancer-related genes (Table 1). This group of genes had a higher proportion of canonical splice sites and exonic mutations than the rest of the genes [13].
On the list of hereditary cancer genes that are highly susceptible to splicing mutations, there are several genes that may contribute to the development of pediatric solid tumors when mutated in the germline: APC [15,16], ATM [17], BRCA1 [18,19], BRCA2 [20], FANCA [15,21], FANCD2 [19], NF1 [22,23,24], NF2 [20,25], MLH1 [26], MSH2 [26], PMS2 [22,26], RB1 [27,28,29,30], and TSC2 [20] (Table 1).
Herein, we review the importance of ASin pediatric cancers, analyzing the germline splice variants described in genes that contribute to pediatric solid tumors and cancer predisposition syndromes. It is important to emphasize that more research is needed in this field since the identification of variants that affect splicing remains a challenge and most studies focus on consensus splice-site variants. Moreover, a better understanding of splicing biology will contribute toward the development of novel therapeutics for pediatric cancer.
To visualize the effects of the mutations that we are reporting in this review, we have represented the sequences that can be altered in Figure 1 and classified them into different groups according to the type of altered sequence: Type I, donor site region; Type II, acceptor site region; Type III, exonic region, including exonic splicing enhancers and silencers; and Type IV, intronic region, including intronic splicing enhancers and silencers.

3. Pediatric Solid Tumors

Solid tumors represent 60% of all pediatric malignant neoplasms, and the tumor types are very different from those found in adults. The most common pediatric tumors include central nervous system (CNS) tumors (35%); neuroblastoma (15%); soft tissue sarcoma (7%); Wilms tumor (6%); bone tumors, including osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma (8%); retinoblastoma (5%); and other rare tumors, including hepatoblastoma, germ cell tumors, and melanoma (17%) [31]. In this review, we focus on the most prevalent tumors in childhood: CNS tumors, sarcomas, and blastomas (neuroblastoma, retinoblastoma, and Wilms tumor).

3.1. CNS Tumors

CNS tumors are the second most common type of cancer among children, and they often occur in patients with a cancer predisposition syndrome [21]. The following subtypes are discussed:

3.1.1. Medulloblastoma

Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant brain tumor in children [32], and recently the World Health Organization (WHO 2021) classified MB at the molecular level into four different types: MB WNT-activated, SHH-activated, group 3, and group 4 [33,34,35]. MBs arise in the cerebellar vermis and spread rapidly through the cerebrospinal pathways [36]. AS is especially prevalent in the mammalian nervous system, including the cerebellum, where it modulates relevant processes (neural tube patterning, synaptogenesis, membrane physiology, and synaptic plasticity), so a disruption of splicing regulation can promote pathogenic events [37].
Menghi et al. investigated patterns of differential splicing between pediatric MBs and the normal cerebellum on a genome-wide scale and concluded that inappropriate splicing frequently occurs in human MBs and may be linked to the activation of developmental signaling pathways and a failure of cerebellar precursor cells to differentiate [7]. Moreover, splicing patterns are distinct and specific between molecular subgroups [38]. Subgroup-specific splicing and alternative promoter usage were most prevalent in group 3 and SHH MBs, while they were less frequent in WNT and group 4. AS events in MB may be partially regulated by the correlative expression of antisense transcripts, suggesting a mechanism affecting subgroup-specific AS [38].
Suzuki et al. discovered that approximately 50% of SHH MBs harbor a somatic mutation in the 5′ splice-site binding region of U1 spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). This mutation is not present across other MB subgroups. SnRNA mutant tumors have significantly disrupted AS, and as a result aberrant AS inactivates PTCH1 and activates oncogenes (GLI2 and CCND2), representing a novel target for therapy [39].
MB tumors may appear sporadically or as a part of an inherited syndrome. Pathogenic germline mutations in known cancer predisposition genes have an important role, mainly in WNT-activated and SHH-activated MB [15]. In a recent study, germline data in 1022 patients with MB were analyzed, and the results showed a significant excess of pathogenic mutations in the APC, BRCA2, PALB2, PTCH1, SUFU, and TP53 genes [15]. Splice variants in the canonical sites and splice regions were found in the ATM, BRCA2, FANCA, FANCC, PALB2, PTCH1, RAD51C, SUFU, WRN, WT1, and XPC genes (Table 2).
For SHH-activated MB, the Gorlin (PTCH1 and SUFU) and the Li–Fraumeni syndromes (TP53) are the most common predisposition syndromes [56,57,58,59]. Additional candidates for SHH-activated MB include BRCA2 and PALB2, which can be associated to Fanconi anemia [15,60,61]. About 5% of patients with Gorlin syndrome (GS) develop MB, mainly the desmoplastic form [62]. Between 50% and 85% of patients with GS have germline mutations in PTCH1. In a study of GS, PTCH1 was analyzed in two familial and three sporadic GS cases, and five germline mutations were found in PTCH1 [42]. One of them was a splice-site mutation (c.584+2T>G) in an 11-year-old male patient who developed MB at the age of 1 year (Table 2).
SUFU is also involved in the susceptibility to MB. In a report, they identified the c.1022+1G>A SUFU germline splice mutation in a family that was PTCH1-negative but had signs and symptoms of GS, including MB [43]. Another study described a family previously diagnosed with GS with a novel SUFU splice-site pathogenic variant (c. 1365+2T>A) [44]. Germline SUFU mutations were analyzed in children with desmoplastic/nodular MB, and eight germline mutations were found, with three of them being splice variants (c.182+3A>T; c.318-10delT; and c.1297-1G>C) [45]. Another report showed SUFU germline mutations in desmoplastic MBs, one of them located in the conserved splice acceptor site of exon 2 (Table 2) [46].
Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal dominant form of familial cancer, characterized by the early onset of diverse malignancies, including sarcomas, brain tumors, and leukemias [63]. Germline mutations in TP53 have primarily been identified in LFS [64]. Mutations in splice sites are also very frequent in LFS, while missense mutations are less common in comparison to other familial or sporadic cancers [65]. Several studies have described splice-site mutations in LFS [55,66,67], but we have only found one study in the IARC TP53 database, which described one splice variant in TP53 in an LFS pediatric patient with MB (c.376-2A>G) [47]. Splice variants in TP53 have been found in a pediatric patient with choroid plexus carcinoma (c.560-2A>C) [55] and in a pediatric glioblastoma patient (c.919+1G>A) (Table 2) [68].
Recently, germline splice mutations in other genes such as ELP1 have been found in two independent families with SHH-activated MB [40]. For WNT-activated MB, Turcot Syndrome (APC) is the most common predisposition syndrome [56], a rare disorder characterized by the association of colonic polyposis and primary brain tumors [69]. In MB associated with APC germline pathogenic variants, no splice variants were found in this review.
Another less common MB-associated syndrome is ataxia telangiectasia (AT) [70]. AT is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by neurological and immunological symptoms, radiosensitivity, and cancer predisposition. The mutated gene in AT is ATM, and different splice variants of this gene have been described in pediatric MB (Table 2) [15]. Moreover, a germline splice variant of the MUTYH gene has been described in a pediatric patient with MB (Table 2) [22].

3.1.2. Gliomas

Gliomas are CNS neoplasms that affect both the brain and spinal cord, and they are the most common primary CNS tumors, mainly astrocytomas [71].

Low-Grade Gliomas (LGGs)

LGGs and glioneural tumors represent over 30% of pediatric CNS neoplasms [72,73]. Within the LGG category, there are different tumor types and subtypes:
a. 
Astrocytoma
Pilocytic astrocytoma is the most common type in children and young adults [72]. In relation to genetic predisposition, one study showed germline splice mutations in the MUTYH and ERCC2 genes [51] in a highly infiltrative astrocytoma and a diffuse astrocytoma, respectively, although the variants were not annotated in the manuscript (Table 2). In a recent study, a novel CHEK2 splice variant (c.444+1G>A) was identified in a 7-year-old child diagnosed with a subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (Table 2) [48]. Functional studies have shown the use of an alternative 5′ splice site that creates a premature stop codon. As a result of this change, the transcript is truncated, which results in reduced CHEK2 protein levels [74].
b. 
Ependymoma
Ependymoma (EP) is the second most common malignant brain tumor in children, and it originates from the walls of the ventricular system [75]. The etiology is largely unknown, and germline DNA sequencing studies on pediatric EP are scarce. Pathogenic germline variants in known cancer predisposition genes have been detected in genes such as NF2, LZTR1, NF1, and TP53 [76]. EP can be associated with type 2 neurofibromatosis with a high proportion of pathogenic mutations in NF2. The most common alterations in NF2 are splice-site or nonsense mutations, but these are mostly found in intracranial meningiomas and other adult nervous system cases [77,78,79], except the variant c.447+1G>A, which was described in a pediatric EP (Table 2) [22].
Epigenetic alterations appear to play a central role in the development of the molecular classification of EPs [80]. Recent findings have shown that posterior fossa type A (PFA) EPs exhibit low H3K27 methylation and overexpress EZHIP (enhancer of zeste homologs inhibitory protein), which dysregulates gene silencing to promote tumorigenesis. Genomic dataset analyses from PFA and diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) have revealed that these two different tumors share a common dysregulated chromatin landscape [81].
c. 
Optic glioma
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most frequent autosomal dominant disorders and is caused by mutations in the NF1 gene. NF1 patients are predisposed to develop brain tumors, among others, and gliomas are found in 15–20% of affected individuals [82,83]. About 15% of children with NF1 develop low-grade optic pathway gliomas (OPG) [84], whereas high-grade gliomas, including anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) and glioblastomas, are less frequent in children with NF1 [23,85].
In one study, NF1 patients were analyzed (31% with OPG), and an NF1-splice germline variant was found in a OPG patient: c.2325+1G>A, which produced exon 14 skipping (Table 2) [50]. Different NF1 germline mutations in pediatric glioma patients that affected the splicing process have been described: c.205_205insTC, c.1185+1G>A, c.889-2A>G, c.2325+1G>A, and c.1260+1G>T in pilocytic astrocytomas and OPG [49]. Moreover, the variant c.6641+1G>A has been found in a pediatric LGG (Table 2) [22].

High-Grade Gliomas (HGGs)

HGG is one of the most fatal childhood brain tumors and can be associated with underlying cancer predisposition syndromes such as NF1 and Turcot and Li–Fraumeni syndromes [86].
NF1 germline mutations have been described in high glioma pediatric patients, affecting the splicing process as c.1641+2T>A and c.4174-2>AG in glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), respectively (Table 2) [49].
Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is a syndrome caused by biallelic mutations in the mismatch repair pathway [87]. This repair system comprises different genes, including MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2 [88]. Patients with CMMRD or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) who develop brain tumors were lumped together under the term Turcot syndrome [16]. Biallelic germline splice mutations in MSH6 have been reported in MB and in glioblastoma multiforme (Table 2) [41]. In a report, an inactivating germline mutation in MUTYH was found in a patient with a high-grade midline glioma (Table 2) [52]. A germline mutation in ATM, affecting the splicing process, was found in a pediatric HGG patient (Table 2) [22].

3.1.3. Other CNS Tumors

Pinealoblastoma

The DICER1 syndrome is related to several benign and malignant tumors, including rhabdomyosarcoma and pinealoblastoma [89]. A germline DICER1 splice-site variant (c.4050+1G>A) was found in a 10-year-old patient with pinealoblastoma (Table 2) [54].

Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors

Rhabdoid tumors (RTs) are most commonly observed in the brain, where they are called atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) [53]. The majority of RTs are caused by a loss of function in SMARCB1, and more recently mutations in SMARCB4 have been found as a cause of RTs. Germline mutations in SMARCB1 are also associated with familial schwannomatosis [90]. Deletions or truncating mutations of SMARCB1 are generally found in AT/RT, and loss-of-function mutations in exon 1 and splice-site mutations are more frequent in schwannomatosis [90]. Kordes et al. analyzed 50 patients with AR/RT, and germline mutations in SMARCB1 were detected in 10 patients, including one splice-site mutation: c.501-2A>G (Table 2) [53].
In another report, they showed an inherited SMARCB1 mutation in a two-generation family that was a splice-site mutation in exon 7 [91]. In a recent study, they presented two siblings with congenital AT/RT due to a germline SVA-E retrotransposon insertion into intron 2 that disrupts the splicing between exons 2 and 3 of SMARCB1 [92].

3.2. Sarcomas

Sarcomas are tumors with a mesenchymal origin that comprise around 12% of all neoplasms in children and adolescents. They are a very heterogeneous group of tumors, comprising more than 70 distinct histological subtypes. Sarcomasare classified into two main groups: bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma being the most frequent types in children and adolescents [93].

3.2.1. Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumor. The peak incidence occurs during the pubertal growth spurt [94]. It was estimated that 10% of osteosarcoma patients have a hereditary predisposition syndrome [95]. However, recent publications estimated that 28% of patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma had pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants [18]. Many different cancer predisposition syndromes are associated with osteosarcoma development, including autosomal dominant disorders (LFS and hereditary retinoblastoma [96,97]) and autosomal recessive disorders (primarily DNA helicase disorders: Rothmund–Thomson, RAPADILINO, Werner, and Bloom syndromes [98,99,100]).
LFS is associated with germline loss-of-function mutations in TP53. Several germline variants have been described in TP53 affecting mRNA splicing, some of them associated with osteosarcoma development in pediatric patients (Table 3). A rare TP53 germline mutation, c.671+1G>A, was described in a 15-year-old patient diagnosed with osteosarcoma in an LFS context. This variant results in a 6-amino-acid insertion between codons 224 and 225 in exon 6 [101]. The TP53 c.672G>A germline variant was reported in a 17-year-old male with two primary sarcomas (pleomorphic sarcoma and telangiectatic osteosarcoma) (Table 3). This variant is a synonymous change that preserves the glutamate in position 224, but the change results in a shift of the exon 6 splice site by five base pairs, producing a frameshift and a premature stop codon at residue 246 in exon 7 [102].
Hereditary retinoblastoma is an autosomal dominant syndrome that is linked to RB1 germline mutations. The primary tumor developed in childhood is retinoblastoma; however, there is an increased risk of developing various neoplasms, especially osteosarcoma [116]. Atypical RB1 germline variants have been described in sarcoma patients without retinoblastoma as a primary tumor [117]. Two pathogenic splice variants have been found in the germline in two different patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma (Table 3) [22,107].
Syndromes characterized by germline mutations in genes encoding DNA helicases of the RecQ family have an increased risk for cancer, especially osteosarcoma. These are Rothmund–Thomson, RAPADILINO, Werner, and Bloom syndromes [118]. Rothmund–Thomson and RAPALIDINO syndromes are caused by mutations in the RECQL4 gene. Rothmund–Thomson syndrome is a disorder characterized by poikilodermatous skin changes, congenital skeletal abnormalities, premature aging, and an increased risk for cancer [119]. RAPALIDINO is a very rare syndrome identified by radial hypoplasia, patellae hypoplasia, a cleft or highly arched palate, diarrhea, dislocated joints, small size and limb malformation, a slender nose, and normal intelligence. In the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD), 14% of the reported variants in the RECQL4 gene are splice variants, and 7 of the 25 splice variants are described in patients diagnosed with Rothmund–Thomson syndrome who developed osteosarcoma (Table 3) [108,109,110,111].
Werner syndrome is a disease caused by mutations in the WRN gene, and it is associated with the development of osteosarcoma during adult life [95]. Bloom syndrome is caused by mutations in another DNA helicase gene, BLM. This syndrome is characterized by clinical features including small stature, photosensitive rashes, and immunodeficiency [95]. Ten percent of BLM variants reported in the HGMD are splice variants; however, none of these variants are associated with the development of osteosarcoma.

3.2.2. Ewing Sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma is the second most common bone and soft tissue cancer. The majority of Ewing sarcomas arise in bone, and up to 30% arise in soft tissue. The highest incidence is in the second decade of life. Ewing sarcoma development is uncommon in patients younger than 5 years or older than 30 years [120,121,122].
Ewing sarcoma is characterized by a low somatic mutation rate, and it is mainly caused by a chromosome rearrangement as a driver alteration. This rearrangement is between the EWSR1 gene and members of the ETS gene family. The most common is the EWSR1-FLI1 fusion gene [123]. Most of studies related to Ewing sarcoma predisposition have focused on the identification of susceptibility loci from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) [124].
Aberrant splicing of the EWS-FLI1 transcript alters EWS-FLI1 protein expression and EWS-FLI1-driven expression [125]. Targeting EWS-FLI1 is one of the therapeutic options, but recently epigenetic/transcriptional modulators have been proven to be promising therapeutic strategies for indirectly altering its expression and/or function [126].
EWS-FLI1 induces the expression of a specific set of novel spliced and polyadenylated transcripts in regions of the genome that are normally transcriptionally silent. These neogenes are practically undetectable in normal tissues or non-Ewing-sarcoma tumors [127].
Recently, germline pathogenic variants have been described in genes involved in DNA damage repair in Ewing sarcoma patients [19,107]. In these studies, germline splice variants have been found in the NTHL1, SLX4, CHEK2, EXT2, RAD51C, FANCA, FANCC, and FANCD2 genes (Table 2), most of them described in splice sites. All of these genes, except EXT2, are involved in the DNA repair response through different signaling pathways such as the nucleotide-excision repair (NER) pathway, DNA double-strand break repair, the DNA damage checkpoint, and oxidative DNA damage repair [128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135]. A loss of the functionality of DNA repair proteins could contribute to rearrangement signatures due to the failure of homologous recombination mechanisms [19,107]. Germline mutations in some of these genes are associated with Fanconi anemia (SLX4, FANCA, FANCC, and FANCD2) [136,137].

3.2.3. Rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma developed at a pediatric age. The two main subtypes are embryonal and alveolar RMS [93,138]. Chromosomal translocations involving chromosomes 1 or 2 and chromosome 13 are associated with 80% of alveolar RMS cases. These rearrangements fuse the PAX3 or PAX7 and FOXO1 genes [139]. Embryonal is the most common subtype, and though translocations are not observed, TP53, KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, CTNNB1, and FGFR4 are the most frequently mutated genes in this subtype [140].
Most rhabdomyosarcomas are primarily sporadic, but they can be associated with several syndromes, including RASopathies and Li–Fraumeni and DICER1 syndromes [141,142,143]. Cancer predisposition syndromes are more frequent in patients with embryonal RMS than in those with the alveolar subtype [138].
RASopathies are a group of disorders caused by germline mutations in the genes involved in the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway with a high risk of cancer development [144,145]. NF1, Costello syndrome, and Noonan syndrome are the RASopathies most frequently associated with the risk of RMS development [146,147]. Costello syndrome is caused by HRAS germline mutations. Noonan syndrome is associated with mutations in the RAS family of genes, PTPN11, and SOS1 genes. The RAS family are GTPases that catalyze the hydrolysis of GTP, activating the MAPK signaling pathway. They are oncogenes that exhibit activating mutations in cancer. Germline splice variants have not been described in the KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS genes in the HGMD database. In contrast, many splice variants have been described in the SOS1 and PTPN11 genes, but none of them were in patients with RMS.
The DICER1 gene encodes an enzyme involved in the production of mature microRNAs [148]. DICER1 germline mutations cause a cancer predisposition syndrome with cancer risk for pleuropulmonary blastoma, cystic nephroma, Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors, pinealoblastoma, and embryonal RMS [149]. In this context, the DICER1 c.1907+1G>A splice variant was found in the germline in a 6-month-old female with an embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma localized in the vagina (Table 3) [115].
Many of the previously mentioned cancer predisposition syndromes are also associated with the development of rhabdomyosarcomas, in particular LFS and NF1. Different splice variants in genes associated with these syndromes, TP53 and NF1, are described in RMS pediatric patients in the germline, all of them described in splice sites (Table 3).

3.3. Neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma (NB) originates from neural crest cells and affects the sympathetic nervous system. It is characterized by an early age of onset and a high frequency of metastatic disease at diagnosis in patients over 1 year of age. NB tumors present few chromosomic aberrations, including MYCN amplification, 17q gain, 1p deletion, and 11q deletion [150].
NB has been associated with the following cancer predisposition syndromes: familial neuroblastoma, familial paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma, CCHS/Hirschsprung, Beckwith–Wiedemann, Simpson–Golabi–Behmel, LFS, Sotos, Costello, Noonan, Rubinstein–Taybi, Wolf–Hirschhorn, Weaver, NF1, ROHHAD, and Fanconi anemia [136,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168].
The PHOX2B and ALK genes are major susceptibility genes of familial NB [150]. PHOX2B encodes a transcription factor promoting neural crest differentiation. NB-exclusive mutations are mainly missense and frameshift; splicing variants of this gene have not yet been associated with NB [169]. ALK was also identified as major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene [170], and as in the previous case, no NB-associated splicing variants have been described.
For patients with sporadic disease, different studies focused on uncommon germline variants associated with NB have been conducted, and pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were identified in predisposition genes such as ALK, CHEK2, BRCA2, SMARCA4, and TP53 and in candidate genes such as AXIN2, PALB2, BARD1, PINK1, APC, BRCA1, SDHB, and LZTR1 [20,22,171,172,173,174]. A pathogenic germline splice variant in BRCA2, c.8488-1G>A, was identified to be associated with NB [22]. PALB2 also had a germline variant that was predicted to delete a splice donor site, c.1684+1C>A [172].

3.4. Retinoblastoma

Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common primary malignant intraocular cancer in children, and it represents 3% of all pediatric tumors [175]. There are different forms of RB: unilateral or unifocal, bilateral or multifocal, and trilateral [175].
Overall, around 90% of bilateral cases and 10–25% of unilateral cases have RB1 germline mutations [176]. RB1 is a tumor-suppressor gene and encodes pRB, a key regulator of the cell cycle [143]. RB1 is one of the hereditary cancer genes that is highly susceptible to splicing mutations. In fact, aberrant splicing of the RB1 gene was found to be the dominant cause of retinoblastomas in a recent study [177]. In this report, they observed that, of all the diseases collected in the HGMD, the highest proportion of splicing phenotypes seen in exonic mutations was found in RB1. These data suggested that RB1 is particularly susceptible to splicing mutations [177]. Consistent with the above, germline mutations affecting RB1 alternative splicing have been identified in many studies of RB patients [22,176,177,178,179,180,181,182].

3.5. Wilms Tumors

Wilms tumor (nephroblastoma, WT) is the most common pediatric renal malignancy, representing 90% of renal tumors and 5–7% of all pediatric malignancies [175]. It is estimated that about 10% of WT cases are caused by germline pathogenic variants or epigenetic alterations occurring early during embryogenesis [183]. WT is primarily a nonhereditary condition [184].
WT is associated with different hereditary cancer syndromes, including WAGR, Denys–Drash, Bloom, Frasier, Gorlin, Beckwith–Wiedemann, Sotos, Simpson–Golabi–Behmel, Perlman, mosaic variegated aneuploidy, Muliebry nanism, hereditary hyperparathyroidism, isolated hemihypertrophy, LFS, DICER1, and Bohring–Opitz syndromes among others [184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207].
There are more than 20 WT predisposition genes. There is an overlap of only four genes, WT1, IGF2, TP53, and DICER1, between the WT predisposition genes and the somatically mutated WT driver genes [183,208].
Regarding the splicing-disrupting mutations, the variant c.1095G>T in CHEK2 was shown to affect AS. This variant increases the expression of a transcript without exon 10, which loses the kinase function of the protein [208].
One of the genetic syndromes associated with WT, Frasier syndrome (FS), is caused by splicing variants that affect the balance of WT1 isoforms. Two alternative splice donor sites in intron 9 are responsible for creating two different transcripts (with or without lysine-threonine-serine), and an imbalance in the transcripts results in the development of FS. Pathogenic variants in this intron have been identified in WT patients [209].
An interesting case report described a pediatric patient with no response to treatment to a bilateral WT carrying a novel germline WT1 gene splice-site mutation in intron 6, c.895-2A>G. The authors suggested that the correlation of this variant with response and prognosis should be further studied [210].
A germline mutation affecting splicing in the CTR9 gene has been identified in a family with WT [211]. The variant c.958-2A>G produces exon 9 skipping, and it is predicted to encode a truncated protein. Another splice variant was found in CTR9, the splice-site mutation c.1194+2T>C, which is predicted to disrupt the exon 9 splice site, which was analyzed and confirmed with a minigene strategy [212]. A pathogenic germline splice variant has been also found in the TRIM28 gene, a WT predisposition gene: c.840–2A>G [213].

4. Therapeutic Targeting of Splicing in Cancer

The identification of cancer-specific splice variants has increased the development of new therapies to correct aberrant splicing. Different strategies have been used for this purpose, such as blocking components of the spliceosome, targeting protein isoforms produced by incorrect AS, blocking protein kinases that regulate splicing factors, and the use of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), among others [214].
Small molecules that are modulators of the spliceosome have been tested in cancer clinical trials, for example, modulating the splicing factor SF3B [215]. Synthetic analogues of compounds derived from bacteria that are cytotoxic to cancer cell lines were designed to bind SF3B [215]. Upon binding to the splicing factor, they prevent the assembly of the spliceosome, thus inhibiting splicing [216]. Changes in splicing are mainly in genes related to cell cycle regulation and apoptosis [215].
The application of ASOs in cancer therapy is still under intense research, but promising preclinical results have been reported [215]. Results obtained in clinical trials are also encouraging [217]. ASOs can correct cancer-related AS, as it has been shown in cancer cell lines (Figure 2) [215,218]. For all these reasons, there is a growing interest in the use of ASO-based therapeutics in cancer [6,219]. ASOs are particularly interesting in cancer therapy, as they can be generated for specific target sequences. They can decrease the expression of coding oncogenic drivers, and they can target noncoding RNAs. Nevertheless, ASOs have not yet obtained marketing authorization for cancer treatment [218].
There are several challenges that may impact the therapeutic efficacy of oligonucleotide therapeutics in cancer [217]. One of them is to achieve the efficient delivery of the drugs to cancer cells in the body. Oligonucleotides need to overcome several barriers, such as the vascular endothelial barrier or the blood–brain barrier, depending on the target tissue and avoid rapid clearance from circulation to obtain a therapeutic effect [220]. The blood–brain barrier seems to be impervious to oligonucleotides. Many attempts have been performed to deliver oligonucleotides across this barrier, with modest success [220]. The most promising involve conjugates of oligonucleotides with cell-penetrating peptides [221], but there are concerns about the possible toxicities of the peptides.
Other limitations for antisense therapeutics are the complexity of cancers that sometimes involve multiple genes to target and drug interactions. It has been reported that oligonucleotides may compete with chemotherapeutics for plasma protein binding, which can reduce the in vivo efficacy of the combination compared to chemotherapeutics alone [222].
Cancers 14 05967 g002 550
Figure 2. Therapeutic strategy using antisense oligonucleotides. MKNK2 encodes the kinase Mnk2, and exon 14 is defined by two different alternative 3′ splice sites (3′SSa and 3′SSb). In glioblastoma cells, the spliceosome binds to the 3′SSb splice site, producing the oncogenic isoform Mnk2b. Using an ASO to block this site favors the use of 3′SSa, and the tumor-suppressive protein Mnk2a is produced [223].
Figure 2. Therapeutic strategy using antisense oligonucleotides. MKNK2 encodes the kinase Mnk2, and exon 14 is defined by two different alternative 3′ splice sites (3′SSa and 3′SSb). In glioblastoma cells, the spliceosome binds to the 3′SSb splice site, producing the oncogenic isoform Mnk2b. Using an ASO to block this site favors the use of 3′SSa, and the tumor-suppressive protein Mnk2a is produced [223].
Cancers 14 05967 g002
Regarding cancer pharmacogenetics, somatic mutations have become druggable targets or biomarkers, whereas germline mutations are potentially responsible for drug responses [224]. Primary resistance to treatments can be supported by germline splicing variants. An example of this is the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib and BIM-γ [225]. There is a recurrent deletion in intron 2 of the BIM gene that was found to be associated with an increased likelihood of chronic myeloid leukemia resistance to imatinib and second-line TKIs [225].
Research on splicing-disrupting mutations in inherited predispositions to solid pediatric cancer and clinical trials are necessary. At this time, there are no clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrial.gov on splicing that include pediatric patients with solid tumors (Figure 3). At the time of this review, there are 1193 registered clinical trials in pediatric solid tumors, but none of them are related to therapies to correct aberrant splicing.
At the time of this review there are no active registered trials at ClinicalTrial.gov using ASOs for pediatric cancer in general. There was a clinical trial that included pediatric patients, which was already completed, to treat patients with advanced melanoma using Bcl-2 ASOs in combination with dacarbazine (NCT00016263). However, for adult cancer there are 18 active trials registered with ASO technology, mainly for lymphomas, leukemias, and solid tumors.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

In this review, we have shown that most of the splicing variants described in the germline in pediatric solid tumors are located in the consensus splice sites. The identification of variants that affect splicing remains a challenge, and most studies only focus on consensus splice-site variants. As a result, variants in exons or deep introns are not studied, and many patients remain undiagnosed. Moreover, it is important to experimentally verify the impact of splicing on variants outside the canonical splice sites to ensure the accurate classification of variants. In this regard, the identification and study of variants for which in silico analyses predict an unknown significance but could alter the splicing process would provide new insights into cancer pathogenesis.
To increase the diagnostic rate, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has a great potential for improving diagnosis because of the splicing results generated by this analysis [226]. RNA-seq provides an opportunity to identify pathogenic variants in the noncoding regions of genes [227]. Several reports have also shown the benefits of RNA-seq for hereditary cancer predisposition genes. In a recent study, RNA analyses allowed the classification of 88% of the cancer gene splicing variants selected for analysis as either pathogenic or benign. These studies show that patients under DNA analysis would benefit from the addition of RNA-seq to the diagnosis [228].
The additional increase in diagnostic yield offered by RNA-seq represents an opportunity for the development of new personalized management strategies that could contribute to improving early detection, therapy, and prognosis [229]. Identifying a cancer predisposition syndrome has a huge impact in the clinical management of pediatric cancer patients and their families, allowing a better follow-up and adequate genetic family counselling.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, P.A.-P., L.A., I.A. and O.V.; writing—review and editing, P.A.-P., L.A., I.A. and O.V.; supervision, O.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basque Government (2021111030) and the Platform to support research on cancer in children and adolescents from EITB Media AND BIOEF, SAU (BIO20/CI/015/BCB). P.A.-P. is supported by a Basque Government fellowship (PRE_2021_2_0048).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of the Pediatric Oncology Group of the Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute for their daily work and involvement. The authors would like to make a special mention to all patients and families who agree to participate in research projects and clinical trials. Thanks to them, research in pediatric cancer is possible.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Modrek, B.; Lee, C. A Genomic View of Alternative Splicing. Nat. Genet. 2002, 30, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, E.; Aifantis, I. RNA Splicing and Cancer. Trends Cancer 2020, 6, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kahles, A.; Lehmann, K.-V.; Toussaint, N.C.; Hüser, M.; Stark, S.G.; Sachsenberg, T.; Stegle, O.; Kohlbacher, O.; Sander, C.; Rätsch, G.; et al. Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Across Tumors from 8705 Patients. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 211–224.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Frankiw, L.; Baltimore, D.; Li, G. Alternative MRNA Splicing in Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gimeno-Valiente, F.; López-Rodas, G.; Castillo, J.; Franco, L. Alternative Splicing, Epigenetic Modifications and Cancer: A Dangerous Triangle, or a Hopeful One? Cancers 2022, 14, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, B.-D.; Lee, N.H. Aberrant RNA Splicing in Cancer and Drug Resistance. Cancers 2018, 10, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Menghi, F.; Jacques, T.S.; Barenco, M.; Schwalbe, E.C.; Clifford, S.C.; Hubank, M.; Ham, J. Genome-Wide Analysis of Alternative Splicing in Medulloblastoma Identifies Splicing Patterns Characteristic of Normal Cerebellar Development. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 2045–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wei, R.; Yao, Y.; Yang, W.; Zheng, C.-H.; Zhao, M.; Xia, J. DbCPG: A Web Resource for Cancer Predisposition Genes. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 37803–37811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Johnson, L.-M.; Hamilton, K.V.; Valdez, J.M.; Knapp, E.; Baker, J.N.; Nichols, K.E. Ethical Considerations Surrounding Germline Next-Generation Sequencing of Children with Cancer. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2017, 17, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Plon, S.E.; Lupo, P.J. Genetic Predisposition to Childhood Cancer in the Genomic Era. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2019, 20, 241–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nix, P.; Mundt, E.; Coffee, B.; Goossen, E.; Warf, B.M.; Brown, K.; Bowles, K.; Roa, B. Interpretation of BRCA2 Splicing Variants: A Case Series of Challenging Variant Interpretations and the Importance of Functional RNA Analysis. Fam. Cancer 2021, 21, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jayasinghe, R.G.; Cao, S.; Gao, Q.; Wendl, M.C.; Vo, N.S.; Reynolds, S.M.; Zhao, Y.; Climente-González, H.; Chai, S.; Wang, F.; et al. Systematic Analysis of Splice-Site-Creating Mutations in Cancer. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 270–281.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Rhine, C.L.; Cygan, K.J.; Soemedi, R.; Maguire, S.; Murray, M.F.; Monaghan, S.F.; Fairbrother, W.G. Hereditary Cancer Genes Are Highly Susceptible to Splicing Mutations. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Forbes, S.A.; Beare, D.; Gunasekaran, P.; Leung, K.; Bindal, N.; Boutselakis, H.; Ding, M.; Bamford, S.; Cole, C.; Ward, S.; et al. COSMIC: Exploring the World’s Knowledge of Somatic Mutations in Human Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D805–D811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Waszak, S.M.; Northcott, P.A.; Buchhalter, I.; Robinson, G.W.; Sutter, C.; Groebner, S.; Grund, K.B.; Brugières, L.; Jones, D.T.W.; Pajtler, K.W.; et al. Spectrum and Prevalence of Genetic Predisposition in Medulloblastoma: A Retrospective Genetic Study and Prospective Validation in a Clinical Trial Cohort. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 785–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hamilton, S.R.; Liu, B.; Parsons, R.E.; Papadopoulos, N.; Jen, J.; Powell, S.M.; Krush, A.J.; Berk, T.; Cohen, Z.; Tetu, B.; et al. The Molecular Basis of Turcot’s Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 332, 839–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. The St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital–Washington University Pediatric Cancer Genome Project. The Genomic Landscape of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma and Pediatric Non-Brainstem High-Grade Glioma. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mirabello, L.; Zhu, B.; Koster, R.; Karlins, E.; Dean, M.; Yeager, M.; Gianferante, M.; Spector, L.G.; Morton, L.M.; Karyadi, D.; et al. Frequency of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Cancer-Susceptibility Genes in Patients with Osteosarcoma. JAMA Oncol. 2020, 6, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brohl, A.S.; Patidar, R.; Turner, C.E.; Wen, X.; Song, Y.K.; Wei, J.S.; Calzone, K.A.; Khan, J. Frequent Inactivating Germline Mutations in DNA Repair Genes in Patients with Ewing Sarcoma. Genet. Med. 2017, 19, 955–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gröbner, S.N.; Worst, B.C.; Weischenfeldt, J.; Buchhalter, I.; Kleinheinz, K.; Rudneva, V.A.; Johann, P.D.; Balasubramanian, G.P.; Segura-Wang, M.; Brabetz, S.; et al. The Landscape of Genomic Alterations across Childhood Cancers. Nature 2018, 555, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Muskens, I.S.; Zhang, C.; de Smith, A.J.; Biegel, J.A.; Walsh, K.M.; Wiemels, J.L. Germline Genetic Landscape of Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumors. Neuro-Oncol. 2019, 21, 1376–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, J.; Walsh, M.F.; Wu, G.; Edmonson, M.N.; Gruber, T.A.; Easton, J.; Hedges, D.; Ma, X.; Zhou, X.; Yergeau, D.A.; et al. Germline Mutations in Predisposition Genes in Pediatric Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 2336–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Listernick, R.; Charrow, J.; Greenwald, M.; Mets, M. Natural History of Optic Pathway Tumors in Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Longitudinal Study. J. Pediatr. 1994, 125, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Helfferich, J.; Nijmeijer, R.; Brouwer, O.F.; Boon, M.; Fock, A.; Hoving, E.W.; Meijer, L.; den Dunnen, W.F.A.; de Bont, E.S.J.M. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Low Grade Gliomas: A Comparison with Sporadic Low Grade Gliomas. Crit. Rev. Oncol. /Hematol. 2016, 104, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ruggieri, M.; Praticò, A.D.; Serra, A.; Maiolino, L.; Cocuzza, S.; Di Mauro, P.; Licciardello, L.; Milone, P.; Privitera, G.; Belfiore, G.; et al. Childhood Neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) and Related Disorders: From Bench to Bedside and Biologically Targeted Therapies. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2016, 36, 345–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bouffet, E.; Larouche, V.; Campbell, B.B.; Merico, D.; de Borja, R.; Aronson, M.; Durno, C.; Krueger, J.; Cabric, V.; Ramaswamy, V.; et al. Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Hypermutant Glioblastoma Multiforme Resulting from Germline Biallelic Mismatch Repair Deficiency. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 2206–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Brichard, B.; Heusterspreute, M.; De Potter, P.; Chantrain, C.; Vermylen, C.; Sibille, C.; Gala, J.-L. Unilateral Retinoblastoma, Lack of Familial History and Older Age Does Not Exclude Germline RB1 Gene Mutation. Eur. J. Cancer 2006, 42, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Broaddus, E.; Topham, A.; Singh, A.D. Incidence of Retinoblastoma in the USA: 1975–2004. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009, 93, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rubenfeld, M.; Abramson, D.H.; Ellsworth, R.M.; Kitchin, F.D. Unilateral vs. Bilateral Retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology 1986, 93, 1016–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Plowman, P.N.; Pizer, B.; Kingston, J.E. Pineal Parenchymal Tumours: II. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 16, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dome, J.S.; Rodriguez-Galindo, C.; Spunt, S.L.; Santana, V.M. Pediatric Solid Tumors. In Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 1703–1747.e11. ISBN 978-0-323-47674-4. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dubuc, A.M.; Northcott, P.A.; Mack, S.; Witt, H.; Pfister, S.; Taylor, M.D. The Genetics of Pediatric Brain Tumors. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2010, 10, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cho, Y.-J.; Tsherniak, A.; Tamayo, P.; Santagata, S.; Ligon, A.; Greulich, H.; Berhoukim, R.; Amani, V.; Goumnerova, L.; Eberhart, C.G.; et al. Integrative Genomic Analysis of Medulloblastoma Identifies a Molecular Subgroup That Drives Poor Clinical Outcome. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 1424–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kool, M.; Koster, J.; Bunt, J.; Hasselt, N.E.; Lakeman, A.; van Sluis, P.; Troost, D.; Meeteren, N.S.; Caron, H.N.; Cloos, J.; et al. Integrated Genomics Identifies Five Medulloblastoma Subtypes with Distinct Genetic Profiles, Pathway Signatures and Clinicopathological Features. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Northcott, P.A.; Hielscher, T.; Dubuc, A.; Mack, S.; Shih, D.; Remke, M.; Al-Halabi, H.; Albrecht, S.; Jabado, N.; Eberhart, C.G.; et al. Pediatric and Adult Sonic Hedgehog Medulloblastomas Are Clinically and Molecularly Distinct. Acta Neuropathol. 2011, 122, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Roussel, M.F.; Hatten, M.E. Cerebellum. In Current Topics in Developmental Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 94, pp. 235–282. ISBN 978-0-12-380916-2. [Google Scholar]
  37. Farini, D.; Marazziti, D.; Geloso, M.C.; Sette, C. Transcriptome Programs Involved in the Development and Structure of the Cerebellum. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 6431–6451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dubuc, A.M.; Morrissy, A.S.; Kloosterhof, N.K.; Northcott, P.A.; Yu, E.P.Y.; Shih, D.; Peacock, J.; Grajkowska, W.; van Meter, T.; Eberhart, C.G.; et al. Subgroup-Specific Alternative Splicing in Medulloblastoma. Acta Neuropathol. 2012, 123, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Suzuki, H.; Kumar, S.A.; Shuai, S.; Diaz-Navarro, A.; Gutierrez-Fernandez, A.; De Antonellis, P.; Cavalli, F.M.G.; Juraschka, K.; Farooq, H.; Shibahara, I.; et al. Recurrent Noncoding U1 SnRNA Mutations Drive Cryptic Splicing in SHH Medulloblastoma. Nature 2019, 574, 707–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Waszak, S.M.; Robinson, G.W.; Gudenas, B.L.; Smith, K.S.; Forget, A.; Kojic, M.; Garcia-Lopez, J.; Hadley, J.; Hamilton, K.V.; Indersie, E.; et al. Germline Elongator Mutations in Sonic Hedgehog Medulloblastoma. Nature 2020, 580, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ilencikova, D.; Sejnova, D.; Jindrova, J.; Babal, P. High-Grade Brain Tumors in Siblings with Biallelic MSH6 Mutations: Biallelic MSH6 Mutations and Malignancies. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2011, 57, 1067–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fujii, M.; Noguchi, K.; Urade, M.; Muraki, Y.; Moridera, K.; Kishimoto, H.; Hashimoto-Tamaoki, T.; Nakano, Y. Novel PTCH1 Mutations in Japanese Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome Patients: Two Familial and Three Sporadic Cases Including the First Japanese Patient with Medulloblastoma. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 56, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pastorino, L.; Ghiorzo, P.; Nasti, S.; Battistuzzi, L.; Cusano, R.; Marzocchi, C.; Garrè, M.L.; Clementi, M.; Scarrà, G.B. Identification of a SUFU Germline Mutation in a Family with Gorlin Syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2009, 149A, 1539–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huq, A.J.; Walsh, M.; Rajagopalan, B.; Finlay, M.; Trainer, A.H.; Bonnet, F.; Sevenet, N.; Winship, I.M. Mutations in SUFU and PTCH1 Genes May Cause Different Cutaneous Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: Similar, but Not the Same. Fam. Cancer 2018, 17, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brugières, L.; Remenieras, A.; Pierron, G.; Varlet, P.; Forget, S.; Byrde, V.; Bombled, J.; Puget, S.; Caron, O.; Dufour, C.; et al. High Frequency of Germline SUFU Mutations in Children With Desmoplastic/Nodular Medulloblastoma Younger Than 3 Years of Age. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 2087–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Taylor, M.D.; Liu, L.; Raffel, C.; Hui, C.; Mainprize, T.G.; Zhang, X.; Agatep, R.; Chiappa, S.; Gao, L.; Lowrance, A.; et al. Mutations in SUFU Predispose to Medulloblastoma. Nat. Genet. 2002, 31, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chompret, A.; Brugières, L.; Ronsin, M.; Gardes, M.; Dessarps-Freichey, F.; Abel, A.; Hua, D.; Ligot, L.; Dondon, M.G.; Bressac-de Paillerets, B.; et al. P53 Germline Mutations in Childhood Cancers and Cancer Risk for Carrier Individuals. Br. J. Cancer 2000, 82, 1932–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Venkataramany, A.S.; Schieffer, K.M.; Lee, K.; Cottrell, C.E.; Wang, P.Y.; Mardis, E.R.; Cripe, T.P.; Chandler, D.S. Alternative RNA Splicing Defects in Pediatric Cancers: New Insights in Tumorigenesis and Potential Therapeutic Vulnerabilities. Ann. Oncol. 2022, 33, 578–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. D’Angelo, F.; Ceccarelli, M.; Tala; Garofano, L.; Zhang, J.; Frattini, V.; Caruso, F.P.; Lewis, G.; Alfaro, K.D.; Bauchet, L.; et al. The Molecular Landscape of Glioma in Patients with Neurofibromatosis 1. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nemethova, M.; Bolcekova, A.; Ilencikova, D.; Durovcikova, D.; Hlinkova, K.; Hlavata, A.; Kovacs, L.; Kadasi, L.; Zatkova, A. Thirty-Nine Novel Neurofibromatosis 1 ( NF1) Gene Mutations Identified in Slovak Patients: NF1 in Slovakia. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2013, 77, 364–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kline, C.N.; Joseph, N.M.; Grenert, J.P.; van Ziffle, J.; Talevich, E.; Onodera, C.; Aboian, M.; Cha, S.; Raleigh, D.R.; Braunstein, S.; et al. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing of Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Patients Improves Diagnosis, Identifies Pathogenic Germline Mutations, and Directs Targeted Therapy. Neuro-Oncol. 2016, 19, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Kline, C.N.; Joseph, N.M.; Grenert, J.P.; van Ziffle, J.; Yeh, I.; Bastian, B.C.; Mueller, S.; Solomon, D.A. Inactivating MUTYH Germline Mutations in Pediatric Patients with High-Grade Midline Gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2016, 18, 752–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kordes, U.; Gesk, S.; Frühwald, M.C.; Graf, N.; Leuschner, I.; Hasselblatt, M.; Jeibmann, A.; Oyen, F.; Peters, O.; Pietsch, T.; et al. Clinical and Molecular Features in Patients with Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor or Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor: Molecular Features in Patients with ATRT. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 2010, 49, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. de Kock, L.; Sabbaghian, N.; Druker, H.; Weber, E.; Hamel, N.; Miller, S.; Choong, C.S.; Gottardo, N.G.; Kees, U.R.; Rednam, S.P.; et al. Germ-Line and Somatic DICER1 Mutations in Pineoblastoma. Acta Neuropathol. 2014, 128, 583–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Jolly, K.W.; Malkin, D.; Douglass, E.C.; Brown, T.F.; Sinclair, A.E.; Look, A.T. Splice-Site Mutation of the P53 Gene in a Family with Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer. Oncogene 1994, 9, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Hottinger, A.F.; Khakoo, Y. Neurooncology of Familial Cancer Syndromes. J. Child Neurol. 2009, 24, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Smith, M.J.; Beetz, C.; Williams, S.G.; Bhaskar, S.S.; O’Sullivan, J.; Anderson, B.; Daly, S.B.; Urquhart, J.E.; Bholah, Z.; Oudit, D.; et al. Germline Mutations in SUFU Cause Gorlin Syndrome–Associated Childhood Medulloblastoma and Redefine the Risk Associated With PTCH1 Mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 4155–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhukova, N.; Ramaswamy, V.; Remke, M.; Pfaff, E.; Shih, D.J.H.; Martin, D.C.; Castelo-Branco, P.; Baskin, B.; Ray, P.N.; Bouffet, E.; et al. Subgroup-Specific Prognostic Implications of TP53 Mutation in Medulloblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2927–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Kool, M.; Jones, D.T.W.; Jäger, N.; Northcott, P.A.; Pugh, T.J.; Hovestadt, V.; Piro, R.M.; Esparza, L.A.; Markant, S.L.; Remke, M.; et al. Genome Sequencing of SHH Medulloblastoma Predicts Genotype-Related Response to Smoothened Inhibition. Cancer Cell 2014, 25, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Miele, E.; Mastronuzzi, A.; Po, A.; Carai, A.; Alfano, V.; Serra, A.; Colafati, G.S.; Strocchio, L.; Antonelli, M.; Buttarelli, F.R.; et al. Characterization of Medulloblastoma in Fanconi Anemia: A Novel Mutation in the BRCA2 Gene and SHH Molecular Subgroup. Biomark. Res. 2015, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Xu, J.; Margol, A.S.; Shukla, A.; Ren, X.; Finlay, J.L.; Krieger, M.D.; Gilles, F.H.; Couch, F.J.; Aziz, M.; Fung, E.T.; et al. Disseminated Medulloblastoma in a Child with Germline BRCA2 6174delT Mutation and without Fanconi Anemia. Front. Oncol. 2015, 5, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Amlashi, S.F.A.; Riffaud, L.; Brassier, G.; Morandi, X. Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome: Relation with Desmoplastic Medulloblastoma in Infancy: A Population-Based Study and Review of the Literature. Cancer 2003, 98, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, F.P.; Fraumeni, J.F.; Mulvihill, J.J.; Blattner, W.A.; Dreyfus, M.G.; Tucker, M.A.; Miller, R.W. A Cancer Family Syndrome in Twenty-Four Kindreds. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 5358–5362. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Fromentel, C.C.D.; Soussi, T. TP53 Tumor Suppressor Gene: A Model for Investigating Human Mutagenesis. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 1992, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kouidou, S.; Malousi, A.; Maglaveras, N. Li-Fraumeni and Li-Fraumeni-like Syndrome Mutations in P53 Are Associated with Exonic Methylation and Splicing Regulatory Elements: LF/LFL SYNDROME MUTATIONS IN P53. Mol. Carcinog. 2009, 48, 895–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Warneford, S.G.; Witton, L.J.; Townsend, M.L.; Rowe, P.B.; Reddel, R.R.; Dalla-Pozza, L.; Symonds, G. Germ-Line Splicing Mutation of the P53 Gene in a Cancer-Prone Family. Cell Growth Differ. 1992, 3, 839–846. [Google Scholar]
  67. Felix, C.A.; Strauss, E.A.; D’Amico, D.; Tsokos, M.; Winter, S.; Mitsudomi, T.; Nau, M.M.; Brown, D.L.; Leahey, A.M.; Horowitz, M.E. A Novel Germline P53 Splicing Mutation in a Pediatric Patient with a Second Malignant Neoplasm. Oncogene 1993, 8, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar]
  68. Haque, M.M.; Kowtal, P.; Sarin, R. Identification and Characterization of TP53 Gene Allele Dropout in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome and Oral Cancer Cohorts. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Northcott, P.A.; Buchhalter, I.; Morrissy, A.S.; Hovestadt, V.; Weischenfeldt, J.; Ehrenberger, T.; Gröbner, S.; Segura-Wang, M.; Zichner, T.; Rudneva, V.A.; et al. The Whole-Genome Landscape of Medulloblastoma Subtypes. Nature 2017, 547, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hart, R.M.; Kimler, B.F.; Evans, R.G.; Park, C.H. Radiotherapeutic Management of Medulloblastoma in a Pediatric Patient with Ataxia Telangiectasia. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1987, 13, 1237–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sturm, D.; Pfister, S.M.; Jones, D.T.W. Pediatric Gliomas: Current Concepts on Diagnosis, Biology, and Clinical Management. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 2370–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ostrom, Q.T.; Gittleman, H.; Fulop, J.; Liu, M.; Blanda, R.; Kromer, C.; Wolinsky, Y.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro Oncol. 2015, 17, iv1–iv62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ostrom, Q.T.; de Blank, P.M.; Kruchko, C.; Petersen, C.M.; Liao, P.; Finlay, J.L.; Stearns, D.S.; Wolff, J.E.; Wolinsky, Y.; Letterio, J.J.; et al. Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation Infant and Childhood Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neuro-Oncol. 2015, 16, x1–x36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Dong, X.; Wang, L.; Taniguchi, K.; Wang, X.; Cunningham, J.M.; McDonnell, S.K.; Qian, C.; Marks, A.F.; Slager, S.L.; Peterson, B.J.; et al. Mutations in CHEK2 Associated with Prostate Cancer Risk. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003, 72, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Vitanza, N.A.; Partap, S. Pediatric Ependymoma. J. Child Neurol. 2016, 31, 1354–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Foss-Skiftesvik, J.; Stoltze, U.K.; van Overeem Hansen, T.; Ahlborn, L.B.; Sørensen, E.; Ostrowski, S.R.; Kullegaard, S.M.A.; Laspiur, A.O.; Melchior, L.C.; Scheie, D.; et al. Redefining Germline Predisposition in Children with Molecularly Characterized Ependymoma: A Population-Based 20-Year Cohort. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2022, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Baser, M.E.; Kuramoto, L.; Joe, H.; Friedman, J.M.; Wallace, A.J.; Gillespie, J.E.; Ramsden, R.T.; Evans, D.G.R. Genotype-Phenotype Correlations for Nervous System Tumors in Neurofibromatosis 2: A Population-Based Study. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 75, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Cooper, J.; Giancotti, F.G. Molecular Insights into NF2 /Merlin Tumor Suppressor Function. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 2743–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Painter, S.L.; Sipkova, Z.; Emmanouil, B.; Halliday, D.; Parry, A.; Elston, J.S. Neurofibromatosis Type 2–Related Eye Disease Correlated With Genetic Severity Type. J. Neuro-Ophthalmol. 2019, 39, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stuckert, A.; Bertrand, K.C.; Wang, P.; Smith, A.; Mack, S.C. Weighing Ependymoma as an Epigenetic Disease. J. Neurooncol. 2020, 150, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jain, S.U.; Do, T.J.; Lund, P.J.; Rashoff, A.Q.; Diehl, K.L.; Cieslik, M.; Bajic, A.; Juretic, N.; Deshmukh, S.; Venneti, S.; et al. PFA Ependymoma-Associated Protein EZHIP Inhibits PRC2 Activity through a H3 K27M-like Mechanism. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Uusitalo, E.; Rantanen, M.; Kallionpää, R.A.; Pöyhönen, M.; Leppävirta, J.; Ylä-Outinen, H.; Riccardi, V.M.; Pukkala, E.; Pitkäniemi, J.; Peltonen, S.; et al. Distinctive Cancer Associations in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 1978–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Seminog, O.O.; Goldacre, M.J. Risk of Benign Tumours of Nervous System, and of Malignant Neoplasms, in People with Neurofibromatosis: Population-Based Record-Linkage Study. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 108, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Blanchard, G.; Lafforgue, M.-P.; Lion-François, L.; Kemlin, I.; Rodriguez, D.; Castelnau, P.; Carneiro, M.; Meyer, P.; Rivier, F.; Barbarot, S.; et al. Systematic MRI in NF1 Children under Six Years of Age for the Diagnosis of Optic Pathway Gliomas. Study and Outcome of a French Cohort. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2016, 20, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kaul, A.; Toonen, J.A.; Cimino, P.J.; Gianino, S.M.; Gutmann, D.H. Akt- or MEK-Mediated MTOR Inhibition Suppresses Nf1 Optic Glioma Growth. Neuro-Oncol. 2015, 17, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Braunstein, S.; Raleigh, D.; Bindra, R.; Mueller, S.; Haas-Kogan, D. Pediatric High-Grade Glioma: Current Molecular Landscape and Therapeutic Approaches. J. Neurooncol. 2017, 134, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wimmer, K.; Kratz, C.P.; Vasen, H.F.A.; Caron, O.; Colas, C.; Entz-Werle, N.; Gerdes, A.-M.; Goldberg, Y.; Ilencikova, D.; Muleris, M.; et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome: Suggestions of the European Consortium ‘Care for CMMRD’ (C4CMMRD). J. Med. Genet. 2014, 51, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Wimmer, K.; Etzler, J. Constitutional Mismatch Repair-Deficiency Syndrome: Have We so Far Seen Only the Tip of an Iceberg? Hum. Genet. 2008, 124, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hill, D.A.; Ivanovich, J.; Priest, J.R.; Gurnett, C.A.; Dehner, L.P.; Desruisseau, D.; Jarzembowski, J.A.; Wikenheiser-Brokamp, K.A.; Suarez, B.K.; Whelan, A.J.; et al. DICER1 Mutations in Familial Pleuropulmonary Blastoma. Science 2009, 325, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Smith, M.J.; Wallace, A.J.; Bowers, N.L.; Eaton, H.; Evans, D.G.R. SMARCB1 Mutations in Schwannomatosis and Genotype Correlations with Rhabdoid Tumors. Cancer Genet. 2014, 207, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Taylor, M.D.; Gokgoz, N.; Andrulis, I.L.; Mainprize, T.G.; Drake, J.M.; Rutka, J.T. Familial Posterior Fossa Brain Tumors of Infancy Secondary to Germline Mutation of the HSNF5 Gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 66, 1403–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Sabatella, M.; Mantere, T.; Waanders, E.; Neveling, K.; Mensenkamp, A.R.; Dijk, F.; Hehir-Kwa, J.Y.; Derks, R.; Kwint, M.; O’Gorman, L.; et al. Optical Genome Mapping Identifies a Germline Retrotransposon Insertion in SMARCB1 in Two Siblings with Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors. J. Pathol. 2021, 255, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2020; ISBN 978-92-832-4502-5. [Google Scholar]
  94. Mirabello, L.; Troisi, R.J.; Savage, S.A. International Osteosarcoma Incidence Patterns in Children and Adolescents, Middle Ages and Elderly Persons. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 125, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Calvert, G.T.; Randall, R.L.; Jones, K.B.; Cannon-Albright, L.; Lessnick, S.; Schiffman, J.D. At-Risk Populations for Osteosarcoma: The Syndromes and Beyond. Sarcoma 2012, 2012, 152382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Tinat, J.; Bougeard, G.; Baert-Desurmont, S.; Vasseur, S.; Martin, C.; Bouvignies, E.; Caron, O.; Bressac-de Paillerets, B.; Berthet, P.; Dugast, C.; et al. 2009 Version of the Chompret Criteria for Li Fraumeni Syndrome. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, e108–e109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Chauveinc, L.; Mosseri, V.; Quintana, E.; Desjardins, L.; Schlienger, P.; Doz, F.; Dutrillaux, B. Osteosarcoma Following Retinoblastoma: Age at Onset and Latency Period. Ophthalmic Genet. 2001, 22, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Siitonen, H.A.; Sotkasiira, J.; Biervliet, M.; Benmansour, A.; Capri, Y.; Cormier-Daire, V.; Crandall, B.; Hannula-Jouppi, K.; Hennekam, R.; Herzog, D.; et al. The Mutation Spectrum in RECQL4 Diseases. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 17, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ishikawa, Y.; Miller, R.W.; Machinami, R.; Sugano, H.; Goto, M. Atypical Osteosarcomas in Werner Syndrome (Adult Progeria). Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 2000, 91, 1345–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. German, J. Bloom’s Syndrome. XX. The First 100 Cancers. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1997, 93, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Piao, J.; Sakurai, N.; Iwamoto, S.; Nishioka, J.; Nakatani, K.; Komada, Y.; Mizutani, S.; Takagi, M. Functional Studies of a Novel Germline P53 Splicing Mutation Identified in a Patient with Li–F Raumeni-L Ike Syndrome. Mol. Carcinog. 2013, 52, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Austin, F.; Oyarbide, U.; Massey, G.; Grimes, M.; Corey, S.J. Synonymous Mutation in TP53 Results in a Cryptic Splice Site Affecting Its DNA-binding Site in an Adolescent with Two Primary Sarcomas. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2017, 64, e26584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Sakurai, N.; Iwamoto, S.; Miura, Y.; Nakamura, T.; Matsumine, A.; Nishioka, J.; Nakatani, K.; Komada, Y. Novel P53 Splicing Site Mutation in Li-Fraumeni-like Syndrome with Osteosarcoma: Novel P53 Splicing Site Mutation in LFL. Pediatr. Int. 2013, 55, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Renaux-Petel, M.; Charbonnier, F.; Théry, J.-C.; Fermey, P.; Lienard, G.; Bou, J.; Coutant, S.; Vezain, M.; Kasper, E.; Fourneaux, S.; et al. Contribution of de Novo and Mosaic TP53 Mutations to Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 2018, 55, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Wong, S.S.; Lozano, G.; Gaff, C.L.; Gardner, R.J.M.; Strong, L.C.; Aittomäki, K.; Lindeman, G.J. Novel P53 Germline Mutation in a Patient with Li−Fraumeni Syndrome: Letters to the Editor. Int. Med. J. 2003, 33, 621–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mazoyer, S.; Lalle, P.; Moyret-Lalle, C.; Marçais, C.; Schraub, S.; Frappaz, D.; Sobol, H.; Ozturk, M. Two Germ-Line Mutations Affecting the Same Nucleotide at Codon 257 of P53 Gene, a Rare Site for Mutations. Oncogene 1994, 9, 1237–1239. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  107. Gillani, R.; Camp, S.Y.; Han, S.; Jones, J.K.; Chu, H.; O’Brien, S.; Young, E.L.; Hayes, L.; Mitchell, G.; Fowler, T.; et al. Germline Predisposition to Pediatric Ewing Sarcoma Is Characterized by Inherited Pathogenic Variants in DNA Damage Repair Genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2022, 109, 1026–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, L.L.; Gannavarapu, A.; Kozinetz, C.A.; Levy, M.L.; Lewis, R.A.; Chintagumpala, M.M.; Ruiz-Maldanado, R.; Contreras-Ruiz, J.; Cunniff, C.; Erickson, R.P.; et al. Association Between Osteosarcoma and Deleterious Mutations in the RECQL4 Gene in Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003, 95, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Lindor, N.M.; Furuichi, Y.; Kitao, S.; Shimamoto, A.; Arndt, C.; Jalal, S. Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome Due ToRECQ4 Helicase Mutations: Report and Clinical and Molecular Comparisons with Bloom Syndrome and Werner Syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2000, 90, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Simon, T.; Kohlhase, J.; Wilhelm, C.; Kochanek, M.; De Carolis, B.; Berthold, F. Multiple Malignant Diseases in a Patient with Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome with RECQL4 Mutations: Case Report and Literature Review. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2010, 152A, 1575–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Beghini, A.; Castorina, P.; Roversi, G.; Modiano, P.; Larizza, L. RNA Processing Defects of the Helicase GeneRECQL4 in a Compound Heterozygous Rothmund-Thomson Patient. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2003, 120, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Van Hest, L.P.; Ruijs, M.W.G.; Wagner, A.; van der Meer, C.A.; Verhoef, S.; van‘t Veer, L.J.; Meijers-Heijboer, H. Two TP53 Germline Mutations in a Classical Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Family. Fam. Cancer 2007, 6, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Bouaoun, L.; Sonkin, D.; Ardin, M.; Hollstein, M.; Byrnes, G.; Zavadil, J.; Olivier, M. TP53 Variations in Human Cancers: New Lessons from the IARC TP53 Database and Genomics Data. Hum. Mutat. 2016, 37, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Li, H.; Sisoudiya, S.D.; Martin-Giacalone, B.A.; Khayat, M.M.; Dugan-Perez, S.; Marquez-Do, D.A.; Scheurer, M.E.; Muzny, D.; Boerwinkle, E.; Gibbs, R.A.; et al. Germline Cancer Predisposition Variants in Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report from the Children’s Oncology Group. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2021, 113, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Nashed, L.M.; Mayhew, A.; Gomez-Lobo, V.; Lawlor, C. DICER1 Mutation Detected in an Infant Guides Accurate Diagnosis of Auto-Amputated Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2021, 34, 865–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Dommering, C.J.; Marees, T.; van der Hout, A.H.; Imhof, S.M.; Meijers-Heijboer, H.; Ringens, P.J.; van Leeuwen, F.E.; Moll, A.C. RB1 Mutations and Second Primary Malignancies after Hereditary Retinoblastoma. Fam. Cancer 2012, 11, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Imbert-Bouteille, M.; Gauthier-Villars, M.; Leroux, D.; Meunier, I.; Aerts, I.; Lumbroso-Le Rouic, L.; Lejeune, S.; Delnatte, C.; Abadie, C.; Pujol, P.; et al. Osteosarcoma without Prior Retinoblastoma Related to RB1 Low-penetrance Germline Pathogenic Variants: A Novel Type of RB1 -related Hereditary Predisposition Syndrome? Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2019, 7, e913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Czarnecka, A.M.; Synoradzki, K.; Firlej, W.; Bartnik, E.; Sobczuk, P.; Fiedorowicz, M.; Grieb, P.; Rutkowski, P. Molecular Biology of Osteosarcoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Larizza, L.; Roversi, G.; Volpi, L. Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2010, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Esiashvili, N.; Goodman, M.; Marcus, R.B. Changes in Incidence and Survival of Ewing Sarcoma Patients Over the Past 3 Decades: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Data. J. Pediatr. Hematol./Oncol. 2008, 30, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Choi, E.-Y.K.; Gardner, J.M.; Lucas, D.R.; McHugh, J.B.; Patel, R.M. Ewing Sarcoma. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2014, 31, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Choi, J.H.; Ro, J.Y. The 2020 WHO Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue: Selected Changes and New Entities. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2021, 28, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Crompton, B.D.; Stewart, C.; Taylor-Weiner, A.; Alexe, G.; Kurek, K.C.; Calicchio, M.L.; Kiezun, A.; Carter, S.L.; Shukla, S.A.; Mehta, S.S.; et al. The Genomic Landscape of Pediatric Ewing Sarcoma. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 1326–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Machiela, M.J.; Grünewald, T.G.P.; Surdez, D.; Reynaud, S.; Mirabeau, O.; Karlins, E.; Rubio, R.A.; Zaidi, S.; Grossetete-Lalami, S.; Ballet, S.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Multiple New Loci Associated with Ewing Sarcoma Susceptibility. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Grohar, P.J.; Kim, S.; Rangel Rivera, G.O.; Sen, N.; Haddock, S.; Harlow, M.L.; Maloney, N.K.; Zhu, J.; O’Neill, M.; Jones, T.L.; et al. Functional Genomic Screening Reveals Splicing of the EWS-FLI1 Fusion Transcript as a Vulnerability in Ewing Sarcoma. Cell Rep. 2016, 14, 598–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Mo, J.; Tan, K.; Dong, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, F.; Mei, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhao, K.; Lv, Z.; Ye, Y.; et al. Therapeutic Targeting the Oncogenic Driver EWSR1::FLI1 in Ewing Sarcoma through Inhibition of the FACT Complex. Oncogene 2022, 38, 307–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Vibert, J.; Saulnier, O.; Collin, C.; Petit, F.; Borgman, K.J.E.; Vigneau, J.; Gautier, M.; Zaidi, S.; Pierron, G.; Watson, S.; et al. Oncogenic Chimeric Transcription Factors Drive Tumor-Specific Transcription, Processing, and Translation of Silent Genomic Regions. Mol. Cell 2022, 82, 2458–2471.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Prasad, A.; Wallace, S.S.; Pederson, D.S. Initiation of Base Excision Repair of Oxidative Lesions in Nucleosomes by the Human, Bifunctional DNA Glycosylase NTH1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 8442–8453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Kim, Y. Nuclease Delivery: Versatile Functions of SLX4/FANCP in Genome Maintenance. Mol. Cells 2014, 37, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Bartek, J.; Lukas, J. Chk1 and Chk2 Kinases in Checkpoint Control and Cancer. Cancer Cell 2003, 3, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Ito, S.; Kuraoka, I.; Chymkowitch, P.; Compe, E.; Takedachi, A.; Ishigami, C.; Coin, F.; Egly, J.-M.; Tanaka, K. XPG Stabilizes TFIIH, Allowing Transactivation of Nuclear Receptors: Implications for Cockayne Syndrome in XP-G/CS Patients. Mol. Cell 2007, 26, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Prakash, R.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, W.; Jasin, M. Homologous Recombination and Human Health: The Roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and Associated Proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a016600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Castella, M.; Pujol, R.; Callén, E.; Trujillo, J.P.; Casado, J.A.; Gille, H.; Lach, F.P.; Auerbach, A.D.; Schindler, D.; Benítez, J.; et al. Origin, Functional Role, and Clinical Impact of Fanconi Anemia FANCA Mutations. Blood 2011, 117, 3759–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kitao, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Matsushita, N.; Ohzeki, M.; Ishiai, M.; Takata, M. Functional Interplay between BRCA2/FancD1 and FancC in DNA Repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 21312–21320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Smogorzewska, A.; Matsuoka, S.; Vinciguerra, P.; McDonald, E.R.; Hurov, K.E.; Luo, J.; Ballif, B.A.; Gygi, S.P.; Hofmann, K.; D’Andrea, A.D.; et al. Identification of the FANCI Protein, a Monoubiquitinated FANCD2 Paralog Required for DNA Repair. Cell 2007, 129, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Nalepa, G.; Clapp, D.W. Fanconi Anaemia and Cancer: An Intricate Relationship. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 168–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Ceccaldi, R.; Sarangi, P.; D’Andrea, A.D. The Fanconi Anaemia Pathway: New Players and New Functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 17, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Skapek, S.X.; Ferrari, A.; Gupta, A.A.; Lupo, P.J.; Butler, E.; Shipley, J.; Barr, F.G.; Hawkins, D.S. Rhabdomyosarcoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Parham, D.M.; Barr, F.G. Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma and Its Molecular Basis. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2013, 20, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Shern, J.F.; Selfe, J.; Izquierdo, E.; Patidar, R.; Chou, H.-C.; Song, Y.K.; Yohe, M.E.; Sindiri, S.; Wei, J.; Wen, X.; et al. Genomic Classification and Clinical Outcome in Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From an International Consortium. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 2859–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Diller, L.; Sexsmith, E.; Gottlieb, A.; Li, F.P.; Malkin, D. Germline P53 Mutations Are Frequently Detected in Young Children with Rhabdomyosarcoma. J. Clin. Investig. 1995, 95, 1606–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Doros, L.; Yang, J.; Dehner, L.; Rossi, C.T.; Skiver, K.; Jarzembowski, J.A.; Messinger, Y.; Schultz, K.A.; Williams, G.; André, N.; et al. DICER1 Mutations in Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcomas from Children with and without Familial PPB-Tumor Predisposition Syndrome. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2012, 59, 558–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Capasso, M.; Montella, A.; Tirelli, M.; Maiorino, T.; Cantalupo, S.; Iolascon, A. Genetic Predisposition to Solid Pediatric Cancers. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 590033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ney, G.M.; McKay, L.; Koschmann, C.; Mody, R.; Li, Q. The Emerging Role of Ras Pathway Signaling in Pediatric Cancer. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 5155–5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Aoki, Y.; Niihori, T.; Inoue, S.; Matsubara, Y. Recent Advances in RASopathies. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 61, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Hartley, A.L.; Birch, J.M.; Marsden, H.B.; Harris, M.; Blair, V. Neurofibromatosis in Children with Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 1988, 5, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Kratz, C.P.; Rapisuwon, S.; Reed, H.; Hasle, H.; Rosenberg, P.S. Cancer in Noonan, Costello, Cardiofaciocutaneous and LEOPARD Syndromes. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2011, 157, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Foulkes, W.D.; Priest, J.R.; Duchaine, T.F. DICER1: Mutations, MicroRNAs and Mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014, 14, 662–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Schultz, K.A.P.; Williams, G.M.; Kamihara, J.; Stewart, D.R.; Harris, A.K.; Bauer, A.J.; Turner, J.; Shah, R.; Schneider, K.; Schneider, K.W.; et al. DICER1 and Associated Conditions: Identification of At-Risk Individuals and Recommended Surveillance Strategies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 2251–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Capasso, M.; Diskin, S.J. Genetics and Genomics of Neuroblastoma. In Cancer Genetics; Pasche, B., Ed.; Cancer Treatment and Research; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 2010; Volume 155, pp. 65–84. ISBN 978-1-4419-6032-0. [Google Scholar]
  151. Chitayat, D.; Friedman, J.M.; Dimmick, J.E. Neuroblastoma in a Child with Wiedemann-Beckwith Syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1990, 35, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Maas, S.M.; Vansenne, F.; Kadouch, D.J.M.; Ibrahim, A.; Bliek, J.; Hopman, S.; Mannens, M.M.; Merks, J.H.M.; Maher, E.R.; Hennekam, R.C. Phenotype, Cancer Risk, and Surveillance in Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Depending on Molecular Genetic Subgroups. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2016, 170, 2248–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Trochet, D.; Bourdeaut, F.; Janoueix-Lerosey, I.; Deville, A.; de Pontual, L.; Schleiermacher, G.; Coze, C.; Philip, N.; Frébourg, T.; Munnich, A.; et al. Germline Mutations of the Paired–Like Homeobox 2B (PHOX2B) Gene in Neuroblastoma. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 74, 761–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Rohrer, T.; Trachsel, D.; Engelcke, G.; Hammer, J. Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome Associated with Hirschsprung’s Disease and Neuroblastoma: Case of Multiple Neurocristopathies. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2002, 33, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Barr, E.; Applebaum, M. Genetic Predisposition to Neuroblastoma. Children 2018, 5, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Gripp, K.W.; Lin, A.E. Costello Syndrome: A Ras/Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase Pathway Syndrome (Rasopathy) Resulting from HRAS Germline Mutations. Genet. Med. 2012, 14, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Schimke, R.N.; Collins, D.L.; Stolle, C.A. Paraganglioma, Neuroblastoma, and a SDHB Mutation: Resolution of a 30-Year-Old Mystery. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2010, 152A, 1531–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Birch, J.M.; Alston, R.D.; McNally, R.J.; Evans, D.G.R.; Kelsey, A.M.; Harris, M.; Eden, O.B.; Varley, J.M. Relative Frequency and Morphology of Cancers in Carriers of Germline TP53 Mutations. Oncogene 2001, 20, 4621–4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Ripperger, T.; Bielack, S.S.; Borkhardt, A.; Brecht, I.B.; Burkhardt, B.; Calaminus, G.; Debatin, K.-M.; Deubzer, H.; Dirksen, U.; Eckert, C.; et al. Childhood Cancer Predisposition Syndromes-A Concise Review and Recommendations by the Cancer Predisposition Working Group of the Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2017, 173, 1017–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Cotton, J.L. Noonan Syndrome and Neuroblastoma. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1995, 149, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Origone, P.; Defferrari, R.; Mazzocco, K.; Cunsolo, C.L.; Bernardi, B.D.; Tonini, G.P. Homozygous Inactivation of NF1 Gene in a Patient with Familial NF1 and Disseminated Neuroblastoma. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2003, 118A, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Crucis, A.; Richer, W.; Brugières, L.; Bergeron, C.; Marie-Cardine, A.; Stephan, J.-L.; Girard, P.; Corradini, N.; Munzer, M.; Lacour, B.; et al. Rhabdomyosarcomas in Children with Neurofibromatosis Type I: A National Historical Cohort: Rhabdomyosarcomas and NF1. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2015, 62, 1733–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. De Kort, E.; Conneman, N.; Diderich, K. A Case of Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome and Congenital Neuroblastoma. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2014, 164, 1332–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Berdasco, M.; Ropero, S.; Setien, F.; Fraga, M.F.; Lapunzina, P.; Losson, R.; Alaminos, M.; Cheung, N.-K.; Rahman, N.; Esteller, M. Epigenetic Inactivation of the Sotos Overgrowth Syndrome Gene Histone Methyltransferase NSD1 in Human Neuroblastoma and Glioma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 21830–21835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Nance, M.A.; Neglia, J.P.; Talwar, D.; Berry, S.A. Neuroblastoma in a Patient with Sotos’ Syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 1990, 27, 130–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Tatton-Brown, K.; Murray, A.; Hanks, S.; Douglas, J.; Armstrong, R.; Banka, S.; Bird, L.M.; Clericuzio, C.L.; Cormier-Daire, V.; Cushing, T.; et al. Weaver Syndrome and EZH2 Mutations: Clarifying the Clinical Phenotype. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2013, 161, 2972–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Coulter, D.; Powell, C.M.; Gold, S. Weaver Syndrome and Neuroblastoma. J. Pediatr. Hematol./Oncol. 2008, 30, 758–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Ozcan, A.; Acer, H.; Ciraci, S.; Gumus, H.; Karakukcu, M.; Patiroglu, T.; Ozdemir, M.A.; Unal, E. Neuroblastoma in a Child With Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome. J. Pediatr. Hematol./Oncol. 2017, 39, e224–e226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Bachetti, T.; Ceccherini, I. Causative and Common PHOX2B Variants Define a Broad Phenotypic Spectrum. Clin. Genet. 2020, 97, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Mossé, Y.P.; Laudenslager, M.; Longo, L.; Cole, K.A.; Wood, A.; Attiyeh, E.F.; Laquaglia, M.J.; Sennett, R.; Lynch, J.E.; Perri, P.; et al. Identification of ALK as a Major Familial Neuroblastoma Predisposition Gene. Nature 2008, 455, 930–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Parsons, D.W.; Roy, A.; Yang, Y.; Wang, T.; Scollon, S.; Bergstrom, K.; Kerstein, R.A.; Gutierrez, S.; Petersen, A.K.; Bavle, A.; et al. Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children with Solid Tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2016, 2, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Pugh, T.J.; Morozova, O.; Attiyeh, E.F.; Asgharzadeh, S.; Wei, J.S.; Auclair, D.; Carter, S.L.; Cibulskis, K.; Hanna, M.; Kiezun, A.; et al. The Genetic Landscape of High-Risk Neuroblastoma. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Lasorsa, V.A.; Formicola, D.; Pignataro, P.; Cimmino, F.; Calabrese, F.M.; Mora, J.; Esposito, M.R.; Pantile, M.; Zanon, C.; De Mariano, M.; et al. Exome and Deep Sequencing of Clinically Aggressive Neuroblastoma Reveal Somatic Mutations That Affect Key Pathways Involved in Cancer Progression. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 21840–21852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Mody, R.J.; Wu, Y.-M.; Lonigro, R.J.; Cao, X.; Roychowdhury, S.; Vats, P.; Frank, K.M.; Prensner, J.R.; Asangani, I.; Palanisamy, N.; et al. Integrative Clinical Sequencing in the Management of Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Youth. JAMA 2015, 314, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Trubicka, J.; Grajkowska, W.; Dembowska-Bagińska, B. Molecular Markers of Pediatric Solid Tumors—Diagnosis, Optimizing Treatments, and Determining Susceptibility: Current State and Future Directions. Cells 2022, 11, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Fang, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Ni, X.; Zhao, J.; Gallie, B.L. RB1 Germline Mutation Spectrum and Clinical Features in Patients with Unilateral Retinoblastomas. Ophthalmic Genet. 2021, 42, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Cygan, K.J.; Soemedi, R.; Rhine, C.L.; Profeta, A.; Murphy, E.L.; Murray, M.F.; Fairbrother, W.G. Defective Splicing of the RB1 Transcript Is the Dominant Cause of Retinoblastomas. Hum. Genet. 2017, 136, 1303–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Alonso, J.; García-Miguel, P.; Abelairas, J.; Mendiola, M.; Sarret, E.; Vendrell, M.T.; Navajas, A.; Pestaña, A. Spectrum of Germline RB1 Gene Mutations in Spanish Retinoblastoma Patients: Phenotypic and Molecular Epidemiological Implications: Novel RB1 Mutations in Retinoblastoma. Hum. Mutat. 2001, 17, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Parsam, V.L.; Ali, M.J.; Honavar, S.G.; Vemuganti, G.K.; Kannabiran, C. Splicing Aberrations Caused by Constitutional RB1 Gene Mutations in Retinoblastoma. J. Biosci. 2011, 36, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Lohmann, D.R.; Brandt, B.; Höpping, W.; Passarge, E.; Horsthemke, B. The Spectrum of RB1 Germ-Line Mutations in Hereditary Retinoblastoma. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996, 58, 940–949. [Google Scholar]
  181. Lan, X.; Xu, W.; Tang, X.; Ye, H.; Song, X.; Lin, L.; Ren, X.; Yu, G.; Zhang, H.; Wu, S. Spectrum of RB1 Germline Mutations and Clinical Features in Unrelated Chinese Patients With Retinoblastoma. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Dommering, C.J.; Mol, B.M.; Moll, A.C.; Burton, M.; Cloos, J.; Dorsman, J.C.; Meijers-Heijboer, H.; van der Hout, A.H. RB1 Mutation Spectrum in a Comprehensive Nationwide Cohort of Retinoblastoma Patients. J. Med. Genet. 2014, 51, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Mahamdallie, S.; Yost, S.; Poyastro-Pearson, E.; Holt, E.; Zachariou, A.; Seal, S.; Elliott, A.; Clarke, M.; Warren-Perry, M.; Hanks, S.; et al. Identification of New Wilms Tumour Predisposition Genes: An Exome Sequencing Study. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2019, 3, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Treger, T.D.; Chowdhury, T.; Pritchard-Jones, K.; Behjati, S. The Genetic Changes of Wilms Tumour. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019, 15, 240–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Cooper, W.N.; Luharia, A.; Evans, G.A.; Raza, H.; Haire, A.C.; Grundy, R.; Bowdin, S.C.; Riccio, A.; Sebastio, G.; Bliek, J.; et al. Molecular Subtypes and Phenotypic Expression of Beckwith–Wiedemann Syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2005, 13, 1025–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Cairney, A.E.L.; Andrews, M.; Greenberg, M.; Smith, D.; Weksberg, R. Wilms Tumor in Three Patients with Bloom Syndrome. J. Pediatr. 1987, 111, 414–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Russell, B.; Johnston, J.J.; Biesecker, L.G.; Kramer, N.; Pickart, A.; Rhead, W.; Tan, W.-H.; Brownstein, C.A.; Kate Clarkson, L.; Dobson, A.; et al. Clinical Management of Patients with ASXL1 Mutations and Bohring-Opitz Syndrome, Emphasizing the Need for Wilms Tumor Surveillance. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2015, 167, 2122–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Pelletier, J.; Bruening, W.; Kashtan, C.E.; Mauer, S.M.; Manivel, J.C.; Striegel, J.E.; Houghton, D.C.; Junien, C.; Habib, R.; Fouser, L. Germline Mutations in the Wilms’ Tumor Suppressor Gene Are Associated with Abnormal Urogenital Development in Denys-Drash Syndrome. Cell 1991, 67, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Palculict, T.B.; Ruteshouser, E.C.; Fan, Y.; Wang, W.; Strong, L.; Huff, V. Identification of Germline DICER1 Mutations and Loss of Heterozygosity in Familial Wilms Tumour. J. Med. Genet. 2016, 53, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Scollon, S.; Anglin, A.K.; Thomas, M.; Turner, J.T.; Wolfe Schneider, K. A Comprehensive Review of Pediatric Tumors and Associated Cancer Predisposition Syndromes. J. Genet. Couns. 2017, 26, 387–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Scott, R.H. Syndromes and Constitutional Chromosomal Abnormalities Associated with Wilms Tumour. J. Med. Genet. 2006, 43, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Reid, S. Biallelic BRCA2 Mutations Are Associated with Multiple Malignancies in Childhood Including Familial Wilms Tumour. J. Med. Genet. 2005, 42, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Reid, S.; Schindler, D.; Hanenberg, H.; Barker, K.; Hanks, S.; Kalb, R.; Neveling, K.; Kelly, P.; Seal, S.; Freund, M.; et al. Biallelic Mutations in PALB2 Cause Fanconi Anemia Subtype FA-N and Predispose to Childhood Cancer. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 162–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Barbaux, S.; Niaudet, P.; Gubler, M.-C.; Grünfeld, J.-P.; Jaubert, F.; Kuttenn, F.; Fékété, C.N.; Souleyreau-Therville, N.; Thibaud, E.; Fellous, M.; et al. Donor Splice-Site Mutations in WT1 Are Responsible for Frasier Syndrome. Nat. Genet. 1997, 17, 467–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Cajaiba, M.M.; Bale, A.E.; Alvarez-Franco, M.; McNamara, J.; Reyes-Múgica, M. Rhabdomyosarcoma, Wilms Tumor, and Deletion of the Patched Gene in Gorlin Syndrome. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 3, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Isidor, B.; Bourdeaut, F.; Lafon, D.; Plessis, G.; Lacaze, E.; Kannengiesser, C.; Rossignol, S.; Pichon, O.; Briand, A.; Martin-Coignard, D.; et al. Wilms’ Tumor in Patients with 9q22.3 Microdeletion Syndrome Suggests a Role for PTCH1 in Nephroblastomas. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 21, 784–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  197. Shuman, C.; Smith, A.C.; Steele, L.; Ray, P.N.; Clericuzio, C.; Zackai, E.; Parisi, M.A.; Meadows, A.T.; Kelly, T.; Tichauer, D.; et al. Constitutional UPD for Chromosome 11p15 in Individuals with Isolated Hemihyperplasia Is Associated with High Tumor Risk and Occurs Following Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2006, 140A, 1497–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Hartley, A.L.; Birch, J.M.; Tricker, K.; Wallace, S.A.; Kelsey, A.M.; Harris, M.; Morris Jones, P.H. Wilms’ Tumor in the Li-Fraumeni Cancer Family Syndrome. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1993, 67, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Hanks, S.; Coleman, K.; Reid, S.; Plaja, A.; Firth, H.; FitzPatrick, D.; Kidd, A.; Méhes, K.; Nash, R.; Robin, N.; et al. Constitutional Aneuploidy and Cancer Predisposition Caused by Biallelic Mutations in BUB1B. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 1159–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Scott, R.H.; Walker, L.; Olsen, O.E.; Levitt, G.; Kenney, I.; Maher, E.; Owens, C.M.; Pritchard-Jones, K.; Craft, A.; Rahman, N. Surveillance for Wilms Tumour in At-Risk Children: Pragmatic Recommendations for Best Practice. Arch. Dis. Child. 2006, 91, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Yost, S.; de Wolf, B.; Hanks, S.; Zachariou, A.; Marcozzi, C.; Clarke, M.; de Voer, R.M.; Etemad, B.; Uijttewaal, E.; Ramsay, E.; et al. Biallelic TRIP13 Mutations Predispose to Wilms Tumor and Chromosome Missegregation. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 1148–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Karlberg, N.; Karlberg, S.; Karikoski, R.; Mikkola, S.; Lipsanen-Nyman, M.; Jalanko, H. High Frequency of Tumours in Mulibrey Nanism. J. Pathol. 2009, 218, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Astuti, D.; Morris, M.R.; Cooper, W.N.; Staals, R.H.J.; Wake, N.C.; Fews, G.A.; Gill, H.; Gentle, D.; Shuib, S.; Ricketts, C.J.; et al. Germline Mutations in DIS3L2 Cause the Perlman Syndrome of Overgrowth and Wilms Tumor Susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Gripp, K.W.; Baker, L.; Kandula, V.; Conard, K.; Scavina, M.; Napoli, J.A.; Griffin, G.C.; Thacker, M.; Knox, R.G.; Clark, G.R.; et al. Nephroblastomatosis or Wilms Tumor in a Fourth Patient with a Somatic PIK3CA Mutation. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2016, 170, 2559–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Cottereau, E.; Mortemousque, I.; Moizard, M.-P.; Bürglen, L.; Lacombe, D.; Gilbert-Dussardier, B.; Sigaudy, S.; Boute, O.; David, A.; Faivre, L.; et al. Phenotypic Spectrum of Simpson-Golabi-Behmel Syndrome in a Series of 42 Cases With a Mutation in GPC 3 and Review of the Literature: American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C (Seminars in Medical Genetics). Am. J. Med. Genet. 2013, 163, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Fagali, C.; Kok, F.; Nicola, P.; Kim, C.; Bertola, D.; Albano, L.; Koiffmann, C.P. MLPA Analysis in 30 Sotos Syndrome Patients Revealed One Total NSD1 Deletion and Two Partial Deletions Not Previously Reported. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2009, 52, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Breslow, N.E.; Norris, R.; Norkool, P.A.; Kang, T.; Beckwith, J.B.; Perlman, E.J.; Ritchey, M.L.; Green, D.M.; Nichols, K.E. Characteristics and Outcomes of Children With the Wilms Tumor-Aniridia Syndrome: A Report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 4579–4585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ciceri, S.; Gamba, B.; Corbetta, P.; Mondini, P.; Terenziani, M.; Catania, S.; Nantron, M.; Bianchi, M.; D’Angelo, P.; Torri, F.; et al. Genetic and Epigenetic Analyses Guided by High Resolution Whole-Genome SNP Array Reveals a Possible Role of CHEK2 in Wilms Tumour Susceptibility. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 34079–34089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  209. Tsuji, Y.; Yamamura, T.; Nagano, C.; Horinouchi, T.; Sakakibara, N.; Ishiko, S.; Aoto, Y.; Rossanti, R.; Okada, E.; Tanaka, E.; et al. Systematic Review of Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Frasier Syndrome. Kidney Int. Rep. 2021, 6, 2585–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Lugtenberg, R.T.; Cransberg, K.; Loos, W.J.; Wagner, A.; Alders, M.; van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M.M. Topotecan Distribution in an Anephric Infant with Therapy Resistant Bilateral Wilms Tumor with a Novel Germline WT1 Gene Mutation. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2008, 62, 1039–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Martins, A.G.; Pinto, A.T.; Domingues, R.; Cavaco, B.M. Identification of a Novel CTR9 Germline Mutation in a Family with Wilms Tumor. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2018, 61, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Hanks, S.; Perdeaux, E.R.; Seal, S.; Ruark, E.; Mahamdallie, S.S.; Murray, A.; Ramsay, E.; Del Vecchio Duarte, S.; Zachariou, A.; de Souza, B.; et al. Germline Mutations in the PAF1 Complex Gene CTR9 Predispose to Wilms Tumour. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Hol, J.A.; Diets, I.J.; Krijger, R.R.; Heuvel-Eibrink, M.M.; Jongmans, M.C.; Kuiper, R.P. TRIM28 Variants and Wilms’ Tumour Predisposition. J. Pathol. 2021, 254, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Bessa, C.; Matos, P.; Jordan, P.; Gonçalves, V. Alternative Splicing: Expanding the Landscape of Cancer Biomarkers and Therapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Desterro, J.; Bak-Gordon, P.; Carmo-Fonseca, M. Targeting MRNA Processing as an Anticancer Strategy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 112–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Effenberger, K.A.; Urabe, V.K.; Jurica, M.S. Modulating Splicing with Small Molecular Inhibitors of the Spliceosome: Modulating Splicing with Small Molecular Inhibitors. WIREs RNA 2017, 8, e1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  217. Xiong, H.; Veedu, R.N.; Diermeier, S.D. Recent Advances in Oligonucleotide Therapeutics in Oncology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Quemener, A.M.; Bachelot, L.; Forestier, A.; Donnou-Fournet, E.; Gilot, D.; Galibert, M. The Powerful World of Antisense Oligonucleotides: From Bench to Bedside. WIREs RNA 2020, 11, e1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Inoue, D.; Chew, G.-L.; Liu, B.; Michel, B.C.; Pangallo, J.; D’Avino, A.R.; Hitchman, T.; North, K.; Lee, S.C.-W.; Bitner, L.; et al. Spliceosomal Disruption of the Non-Canonical BAF Complex in Cancer. Nature 2019, 574, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Juliano, R.L. The Delivery of Therapeutic Oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6518–6548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Boisguérin, P.; Deshayes, S.; Gait, M.J.; O’Donovan, L.; Godfrey, C.; Betts, C.A.; Wood, M.J.A.; Lebleu, B. Delivery of Therapeutic Oligonucleotides with Cell Penetrating Peptides. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 87, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Schneider, E.K.; Huang, J.X.; Carbone, V.; Baker, M.; Azad, M.A.K.; Cooper, M.A.; Li, J.; Velkov, T. Drug-Drug Plasma Protein Binding Interactions of Ivacaftor: Ivacaftor Plasma Protein Binding. J. Mol. Recognit. 2015, 28, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Mogilevsky, M.; Shimshon, O.; Kumar, S.; Mogilevsky, A.; Keshet, E.; Yavin, E.; Heyd, F.; Karni, R. Modulation of MKNK2 Alternative Splicing by Splice-Switching Oligonucleotides as a Novel Approach for Glioblastoma Treatment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 11396–11404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Kaehler, M.; Cascorbi, I. Germline Variants in Cancer Therapy. Cancer Drug Resist. 2019, 2, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  225. Ng, K.P.; Hillmer, A.M.; Chuah, C.T.H.; Juan, W.C.; Ko, T.K.; Teo, A.S.M.; Ariyaratne, P.N.; Takahashi, N.; Sawada, K.; Fei, Y.; et al. A Common BIM Deletion Polymorphism Mediates Intrinsic Resistance and Inferior Responses to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Park, E.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, L.; Xing, Y. The Expanding Landscape of Alternative Splicing Variation in Human Populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018, 102, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  227. Scotti, M.M.; Swanson, M.S. RNA Mis-Splicing in Disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016, 17, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Karam, R.; Conner, B.; LaDuca, H.; McGoldrick, K.; Krempely, K.; Richardson, M.E.; Zimmermann, H.; Gutierrez, S.; Reineke, P.; Hoang, L.; et al. Assessment of Diagnostic Outcomes of RNA Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e1913900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  229. Landrith, T.; Li, B.; Cass, A.A.; Conner, B.R.; LaDuca, H.; McKenna, D.B.; Maxwell, K.N.; Domchek, S.; Morman, N.A.; Heinlen, C.; et al. Splicing Profile by Capture RNA-Seq Identifies Pathogenic Germline Variants in Tumor Suppressor Genes. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2020, 4, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 14 05967 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the splicing sequences that can be altered by mutations and their classification for this review. The DNA sequences include donor and acceptor splice sites (Type I and Type II, respectively); exonic sequences, including exonic splicing silencers (ESS) and enhancers (ESE) (Type III); and intronic sequences, including intronic splicing enhancers (ISE) and silencers (ISS) (Type IV).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the splicing sequences that can be altered by mutations and their classification for this review. The DNA sequences include donor and acceptor splice sites (Type I and Type II, respectively); exonic sequences, including exonic splicing silencers (ESS) and enhancers (ESE) (Type III); and intronic sequences, including intronic splicing enhancers (ISE) and silencers (ISS) (Type IV).
Cancers 14 05967 g001
Cancers 14 05967 g003 550
Figure 3. Clinical trials that include research on splicing in pediatric cancer. There are 429,668 registered clinical trials in the ClinicalTrial.gov database at the time of this review. The number is minimized to 13,806 when filtering the trials by the terms cancer and solid tumor. Taking into account the age (child: birth–17 years), there are 1193 clinical trials. When the term splicing is included, no clinical trials are registered.
Figure 3. Clinical trials that include research on splicing in pediatric cancer. There are 429,668 registered clinical trials in the ClinicalTrial.gov database at the time of this review. The number is minimized to 13,806 when filtering the trials by the terms cancer and solid tumor. Taking into account the age (child: birth–17 years), there are 1193 clinical trials. When the term splicing is included, no clinical trials are registered.
Cancers 14 05967 g003
Table
Table 1. Cancer-related genes enriched in splicing alterations.
Table 1. Cancer-related genes enriched in splicing alterations.
Gene aPathway/FunctionAssociated Cancer Predisposition Syndrome
APCTumor suppressorFamilial adenomatous polyposis
ATMTumor suppressorAtaxia telangiectasia
BRCA1Tumor suppressorHereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome
BRCA2Tumor suppressorHereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome
COL1A1Pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen-
COL2A1Pro-alpha1 chains of type II collagen-
ELNElastic fiber formation-
EXT1Tumor suppressorHereditary multiple exostoses, Langer–Giedion syndrome
FANCAFanconi anemia complementation group AFanconi anemia
FANCD2Fanconi anemia complementation group D2Fanconi anemia
FANCGFanconi anemia complementation Group GFanconi anemia
MLH1Tumor suppressorLynch syndrome
MSH2Tumor suppressorLynch syndrome
NF1Tumor suppressorNeurofibromatosis type 1
NF2Tumor suppressorNeurofibromatosis type 2
PMS2Tumor suppressorLynch syndrome
PRKAR1AProtein Kinase CAMP-Dependent Type I Regulatory Subunit Alpha/tumor suppressorCarney complex
RB1Tumor suppressorRetinoblastoma
TSC2Tumor suppressorTuberous sclerosis type 2
WASEffector protein for Rho-type GTPases Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome gene
a Genes predisposing to solid pediatric tumors are highlighted in grey.
Table
Table 2. Germline pathogenic splice variants found in pediatric patients with CNS tumors.
Table 2. Germline pathogenic splice variants found in pediatric patients with CNS tumors.
GeneDiagnosisVariantType of MutationReference
ATMMedulloblastomac.6095G>AI[15]
ATMMedulloblastomac.2921+1G>CI[15]
BRCA2Medulloblastomac.631+2T>GI[15]
BRCA2Medulloblastomac.-39-1_-39delGAII[15]
ELP1Medulloblastomac.3700+1G>AI[40]
ELP1Medulloblastomac.3572+1G>AI[40]
ELP1Medulloblastomac.2959-1G>TII[40]
ELP1Medulloblastomac.741-1G>TII[40]
ELP1Medulloblastomac.649G>AI[40]
ELP1Medulloblastomac.2959-1G>TII[40]
FANCAMedulloblastomac.2778+1G>AI[15]
FANCCMedulloblastomac.996+1G>TI[15]
MSH6Medulloblastomac.(4002-31_4002-8delins24) + (4002-31_4002-8delins24)IV[41]
MUTYHMedulloblastomac.925-2A>GII[22]
PALB2Medulloblastomac.3201+1G>CI[15]
PTCH1Medulloblastomac.1729-2A>GII[15]
PTCH1Medulloblastomac.584 +2T>GI[42]
RAD51CMedulloblastomac.904+5G>TI[15]
SUFUMedulloblastomac.1022 +1 G>A I[43]
SUFUMedulloblastomac. 1365+2T>AI[44]
SUFUMedulloblastomac.182+3A>TI[45]
SUFUMedulloblastomac.318-10delTIV[45]
SUFUMedulloblastomac.1297-1G>CII[45]
SUFUMedulloblastomac.183-1G>TII[46]
SUFUMedulloblastomac.684-2A>GII[15]
SUFUMedulloblastomac.455-1G>AII[15]
TP53Medulloblastomac.376-2A>GII[47]
WRNMedulloblastomac.3139-1G>CII[15]
WT1Medulloblastomac.769+1G>CI[15]
XPCMedulloblastomac.2251-1G>CII[15]
CHEK2Astrocytomac.444+1G>AI[48]
NF1Pilocytic astrocytomac.205_205insTCIII[49]
NF1Pilocytic astrocytomac.1185+1G>AI[49]
NF1Pilocytic astrocytomac.889-2A>GII[49]
NF1Optic pathway gliomac.2325+1G>A I[50]
NF1Optic pathway gliomac.1260+1G>T I[49]
NF1Low-grade gliomac.6641+1G>AI[22]
NF2Ependymomac.447+1G>AI[22]
ERCC2Diffuse astrocytomaNot available [51]
MUTYHHighly infiltrative astrocytomaNot available [51]
ATMHigh-grade gliomac.7630-2A>CII[22]
MUTYHHigh-grade midline gliomac.892-2A>G II[52]
MSH6Glioblastomac.(4002-31_4002-8delins24) + (4002-31_4002-8delins24)IV[41]
NF1Glioblastomac.1641+2T>AI[49]
NF1Anaplastic astrocytomac.4174-2>AGII[49]
TP53Glioblastomac.919+1G>AI[49]
SMARCB1AT/RTc.501-2A>GII[53]
DICER 1Pinealoblastomac.4050+1G>AI[54]
TP53Choroid plexus carcinomac.560-2A>CII[55]
Table
Table 3. Germline pathogenic splice variants found in pediatric patients with sarcomas.
Table 3. Germline pathogenic splice variants found in pediatric patients with sarcomas.
GeneDiagnosisVariantType of MutationReference
TP53Osteosarcomac.671+1G>AI[101]
TP53Osteosarcomac.672+1G>AI[103]
TP53Osteosarcomac.375+1G>AI[104]
TP53Osteosarcomac.559+2T>GI[105]
TP53Osteosarcomac.672+1G>AI[101]
TP53Osteosarcomac.770T>AIII[106]
TP53Telangiectatic osteosarcomac.672G>AI[102]
TP53Osteosarcomac.258+1G>TI[107]
RECQL4Osteosarcomag.2746del11IV[108]
RECQL4Osteosarcomag.3685G>AI[108]
RECQL4Osteosarcomag.2626G>AII[108]
RECQL4Osteosarcomag.3712del24IV[108]
RECQL4Osteosarcomac.1391-1G>AII[109]
RECQL4Osteosarcomac.1704-1G>AII[110]
RECQL4Osteosarcomac.2059-1G>CII[111]
RB1Osteosarcomac.940-1G>AII[22]
RB1Osteosarcomac.2106+2_2106+5delI[107]
NTHL1Ewing sarcomac.116-1G>AII[107]
SLX4Ewing sarcomac.1684-1G>AII[107]
FANCAEwing sarcomac.523-1G>CII[107]
FANCAEwing sarcomac.3828+1G>CI[107]
RAD51CEwing sarcomac.905-3_906delII[107]
RAD51CEwing sarcomac.1026+5_1026+7delI[107]
CHEK2Ewing sarcomac.812+1G>TI[107]
FANCCEwing sarcomac.456+4A>TI[107]
EXT2Ewing sarcomac.69+2insAGGGI[19]
FANCD2Ewing sarcomac.2715+1G>AI[19]
TP53Rhabdomyosarcomac.560-1G>AII[112]
TP53Rhabdomyosarcomac.376-1G>AII[113]
TP53Embryonal rhabdomyosarcomac.783-2A>GII[113]
TP53Spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomac.560-1G>CII[114]
NF1Embryonal rhabdomyosarcomac.6704+1G>TI[114]
DICER1Embryonal rhabdomyosarcomac.1907+1G>AI[115]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alba-Pavón, P.; Alaña, L.; Astigarraga, I.; Villate, O. Splicing-Disrupting Mutations in Inherited Predisposition to Solid Pediatric Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 5967. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235967

AMA Style

Alba-Pavón P, Alaña L, Astigarraga I, Villate O. Splicing-Disrupting Mutations in Inherited Predisposition to Solid Pediatric Cancer. Cancers. 2022; 14(23):5967. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235967

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alba-Pavón, Piedad, Lide Alaña, Itziar Astigarraga, and Olatz Villate. 2022. "Splicing-Disrupting Mutations in Inherited Predisposition to Solid Pediatric Cancer" Cancers 14, no. 23: 5967. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235967

APA Style

Alba-Pavón, P., Alaña, L., Astigarraga, I., & Villate, O. (2022). Splicing-Disrupting Mutations in Inherited Predisposition to Solid Pediatric Cancer. Cancers, 14(23), 5967. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235967

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop