Next Article in Journal
Could We Predict the Response of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
Previous Article in Journal
Tensin2 Is a Novel Diagnostic Marker in GIST, Associated with Gastric Location and Non-Metastatic Tumors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Basal Cell Carcinoma: Pathology, Current Clinical Treatment, and Potential Use of Lipid Nanoparticles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 13
10.3390/cancers14133211
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas in Immunocompetent Patients

by
Paola Savoia
1,*,
Federica Veronese
2,
Lara Camillo
1,
Vanessa Tarantino
2,
Ottavio Cremona
3 and
Elisa Zavattaro
2,4
1
Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
2
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, c.so Mazzini 18, 28100 Novara, Italy
3
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy
4
Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(13), 3211; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133211
Submission received: 30 May 2022 / Revised: 28 June 2022 / Accepted: 29 June 2022 / Published: 30 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

It is widely known that long-term treatment with immunosuppressive drugs represents a risk factor for the onset of malignancies, including multiple basal cell carcinomas. However, multiple basal carcinomas are ao found in the general population, and even in the absence of specific predisposing genetic mutations. This paper aims, through the retrospective evaluation of all patients diagnosed and surgically treated for basal cell carcinomas during 5 years at our Dermatological Division, to identify the characteristics of these subjects and any possible risk factors, useful for outlining specific surveillance programs. In our experience, multiple carcinomas were identified in over 24% of the subjects analyzed, with several lesions removed, ranging from 2 to 11, confirming the relevance of this phenomenon.

Abstract

Background: The onset of multiple BCCs is a relatively common condition, not only among patients undergoing chronic treatment with immunosuppressant drugs, but also in the general population, although specific risk factors for immunocompetent patients have not been identified. A putative role of somatic mutations in the hedgehog pathway should be considered. Methods: This study is a retrospective observation of all patients diagnosed and surgically treated for BCCs during 5 years at our Dermatological Division. For these patients, we evaluated clinical and histopathological characteristics and data about possible risk factors for BCC. Results: Five-hundred and six patients affected by multiple BCCs, accounting for the 24.2% of the entire sample, have been identified. In these patients, the total number of BCCs was 1516, ranging from 2 to 11. Subjects affected by multiple BCCs were more frequently males, with an older age at diagnosis; multiple BCCs developed mainly on the trunk and were often represented by a nodular histotype. The multivariate analysis highlighted that male gender, older age, nodular BCC, or face involvement at the first diagnosis are risk factors for the development of multiple BCCs. Conclusions: The frequency of multiple BCCs even among the non-immunocompromised population underlines the need to subject patients to a close surveillance program, to allow early diagnosis and treatment of additional cancers.

1. Introduction

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human tumor; its incidence progressively increases, with important implications for the treatment needs of affected patients and healthcare costs [1]. The carcinogenic effects of UV radiation have a critical role in the pathogenesis of this cancer, and most BCCs develop in the head and neck region or other chronically photo-exposed areas [2]. However, 10–15% of BCCs arise on mostly covered anatomical sites [3], and the causes underlying this phenomenon have yet to be fully understood.
It is well known that long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs may cause the onset of multiple BCCs in the same patient [4,5,6]. However, also in immunocompetent subjects, this is a non-rare event that, in the literature, is estimated to vary from 5.6% to 29.2%, depending on the different sampling modes and the various geographical origins of patients [7,8,9,10,11]. Overall, a 3-year risk of up to 44% for BCC development after a previous BCC was observed [10], and many published papers confirm that subjects with prior BCC history have a 30–70% chance of having a second primary BCC within 5 years [7,8,9,10,11].
Genetic factors may contribute to the appearance of multiple BCCs in the same patient. The best-known condition is represented by the Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome (BCNS or Gorlin–Goltz syndrome) [12], an autosomal-dominant disorder primarily caused by mutations in the PATCHED-1 (PTCH1) gene, leading to the inappropriate activation of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Furthermore, Rombo and Bazex-Duprè-Cristol syndrome are inherited conditions characterized by the presence of multiple BCCs [13]. Moreover, multiple non-syndromic superficial BCCs may occur as a distinct mendelian trait [14] and more recently, the germline mutations of the BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) have been related to this condition [15]. Exogenous risk factors, such as UV radiation, chemicals (i.e., arsenic or hydrazine) or ionizing radiation [16] play a certain role. However, the hallmarks of patients who develop multiple BCCs are not yet fully clarified.
This paper aims to analyze, through both a personal case series and a review of the most recently published papers, the characteristics of immunocompetent patients affected by multiple BCCs, with the final objective to direct them towards specific surveillance programs, increasing the number of early diagnoses and optimizing healthcare resources.

2. Results

2.1. Clinical Characteristics

Table 1 resumes the clinical and pathological characteristics of our sample, which consisted of a total of 2140 patients. Among them, 1273 (59.5%) were females and 867 (40.5%) males. The median age at first diagnosis of BCC was of about 73 years for the entire sample (range 20–101 years) and was slightly lower for women (median 71.2, range 25–101 years) than for men (median 73.8, range 20–96 years), even if this difference is not statistically significant.
The total number of BCCs excised in this patient’s series was 3222. As expected, most BCCs (60.9%) were located on the face, and the most represented subsite was the nose (26.7%). On the contrary, the anatomical site less frequently involved was the upper limbs (5%). The most frequently observed histotype was represented by a nodular BCC (64.7%, including 57 pigmented BCC); superficial and morphea-like BCCs corresponded, respectively, to 21.1% and 8.7%, and other histotypes, overall, to the remaining 5.4%.

2.2. Patients with Multiple BCC

From the total, 7 patients were excluded from the analysis as they were affected by BCNS syndrome, and 39 were solid organ transplantation recipients. Thus, we evaluated 2094 subjects. Overall, patients affected by multiple BCCs were 506, accounting for 24.2% of this sample. The total number of BCCs diagnosed in these cases was 1515, ranging from 2 to 11 in the same patient, as detailed in Table 2.
Clinical characteristics of patients with multiple BCCs, divided according to the number of tumors, are summarized in Table 3, and compared with those of patients with a single BCC.
Among patients with multiple BCCs, 338 were males (66.7%) and 168 females (33.3%); this difference is statistically significant (p < 0.01). The percentage of male patients arose to 75.4% in the group with more than 4 BCCs. The median age of patients affected by multiple BCCs (evaluated at the time of the first diagnosis) was of 75 years (range 33–97) and was significantly higher than that of patients with a single BCC. Furthermore, we also observed an increase in age at diagnosis parallel to the number of diagnosed lesions.
In 190 patients, multiple BCCs were diagnosed synchronously. In most patients with synchronous lesions (77.6%), 2 BCCs were found. In the 17.9% of cases, there were three synchronous lesions, whereas there was very rarely four or more (3.12% and 2.08%, respectively). Moreover, 170 patients developed multiple BCCs within 1 year from their first diagnosis. The number of patients affected by metachronous lesions arising in different time intervals is shown in detail in Table 3. Interestingly, the mean interval between the appearance of the first and second BCC was 16.4 months, which decreased to 14.6 months between the second and the third, and 10.1 months between the third and the fourth tumor. For all the 1588 patients diagnosed with a single BCC, the follow-up was prolonged until the end of February 2020. None of them developed further BCC during this time interval.
One-hundred and sixteen patients affected by 2 BCCs (41.3%) showed both lesions in the same anatomical area. This percentage drops to 22.2% for patients affected by three BCCs, and to 5.9% for patients affected by four or more BCCs. Interestingly, the percentage of multiple BCCs localized to the back was higher than that of single BCCs arising in this site (23.6% vs. 15.6%), whereas, in most patients affected by a single BCC, tumors developed mainly on the head (42.8% vs. 23.6%); these differences are statistically significant.

2.3. Histopathological Features

Considering all the sample, the most diagnosed histotype was represented by nodular (60.5%), followed by superficial (24.8%), and infiltrative BCCs (11.6%), whereas basosquamous and pigmented subtypes accounted for 2% and 1.1%, respectively.
Table 4 summarizes the histotype of multiple BCCs in patients with two to four lesions. More than half (50.5%) of patients affected by two BCCs had both tumors of the same histological subtype. This percentage decreased to 25% for patients with three BCCs, whereas in cases of four BCCs only 12.5% of patients were affected by tumors belonging to the same histotype.

2.4. Risk Factors for Multiple BCCs

Risk factors for multiple BCCs are summarized in Table 5. Unfortunately, given the retrospective nature of the study, it was not possible to assess all patients for these risk factors. Data regarding skin type and smoking habits were available only in 443 patients with a single BCC and in 155 patients with multiple BCCs. These data are resumed in Table 5, but in consideration of their smallness compared to the totality of the sample, it was not possible to perform a conclusive evaluation. Data about chronic sun exposure (i.e., outdoor work or participation in outdoor activities on a daily or regular basis) were available in 1166 patients affected by a single tumor and in 406 with multiple BCCs. Even if the percentage of chronically sun-exposed patients was slightly higher in the group affected by multiple lesions (16.9% vs. 14.3%), this difference does not reach statistical significance. The same group of patients was investigated for chronic diseases with a potential immunosuppressive role; in this case, differences were non-statistically significant.
No patient reported a previous history of X-ray exposure. The retrospective nature of the stage did not allow us to investigate the possible familiarity.
In multivariate analysis, age, gender, anatomical site, and histology of the first tumor, phototype, sun exposure history, chronic diseases, and smoking were entered as variants (see Table 6). The analyses identified the male gender, an age older than 75 years at diagnosis of the first BCC, and a first BCC with a nodular histotype and/or located on the face, as prognostic indicators for the development of multiple BCCs.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Patient Population and Follow-Up

This study was a retrospective observation of all patients diagnosed and surgically treated for BCC from 1 January 2010 through 31 December 2015, at our Dermatological Division. The study received approval from the local Ethics Committee (CE 149/17). The follow-up of the patients included in the study was extended to February 2020 to ensure an adequate observational time span from the first diagnosis of BCC. The subsequent period was excluded from the analysis due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to healthcare facilities
Solid-organ transplantation recipients and patients affected by the basal cell nevus syndrome (i.e., Gorlin–Gotz syndrome) were excluded from the evaluation. Patients treated with alternative treatments to surgery (imiquimod, photodynamic therapy, or other conservative treatments) were also excluded from the evaluation.

3.2. Statistical Analysis

Student’s t-test and Chi-square test were used to analyze differences on the distribution of variables (gender, age, presence of exogenous risk factors, anatomical location, and histopathological type of the tumor) between groups of patients with single or multiple BCCs.
Patients were grouped according to the number of developed BCCs. We separately considered patients with two, three, and four tumors, while, to avoid excessive fragmentation of results, those with five or more tumors were considered together as a single group. Multiple BCCs were defined as ‘synchronous’ when diagnosed within 60 days from the excision of the first lesion.
Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the potential role of clinical characteristics of patients and of different risk factors in developing multiple BCCs. For the multivariate analysis, we considered the following categorical data: gender (M vs. F); age (<75 vs. >75); histotype (nodular vs. others); anatomical site (face vs. others); phototype (I/II vs. III/IV); sun exposure (yes vs. no); chronical diseases (yes vs. no); smoking (yes vs. no).

4. Discussion

The development of multiple BCCs in the same individual is a frequent occurrence, not only among patient carriers of specific genetic abnormalities [12,13,14,15], or those who underwent chronic immunosuppressive therapies ([4,5,6], but also in non-immunosuppressed patients. Nevertheless, while risk factors in the development of multiple BCCs are well known in both syndromic patients and in carriers of solid organ transplant, or autoimmune diseases, those that characterize immunocompetent subjects are not yet fully identified.

4.1. Incidence of Multiple BCC in Immunocompetent Patients

There are few case studies published on this kind of patient [7,8,9,10,11,17,18,19,20,21,22], and estimating the real incidence of multiple BCCs in non-immunocompromised subjects is difficult. In our experience, the percentage of patients affected by more than one BCC is approximately 24%, in line with what is reported in different series [17,21] and also recently confirmed in a nationwide study performed in the Netherlands, which extrapolated the number of diagnoses from cancer registries evaluating more than 600,000 patients over 20 years [22]. However, this percentage was lower than that observed in other studies, where a median follow-up extended to 10 years allowed the identification of further BCCs in almost half of patients undergoing previous excision [18].

4.2. Timing of Onset

In our experience, multiple BCCs have been removed as synchronous in more than a third of cases (37.5%), even if the likelihood of multiple simultaneous diagnoses decreased for patients with numerous lesions (3.12% and 2.08% for 4 or more).
Moreover, another 28% of patients developed additional lesions within one year of the first diagnosis. Interestingly, the mean interval between the appearance of the first and second BCC was 16.4 months which decreased to 14.6 months between the second and the third, and further decreased to 10.1 months between the third and the fourth tumor. These data are like those also observed in a transplanted patient’s cohort, in which we proved a progressive reduction in the latency time between one neoplasm and the subsequent [23].

4.3. Anatomical Sites

We observed that the presence of multiple BCCs in the same anatomic area is a frequent event, even if the possibility that all lesions occur in the same site decreases with the number. Recently, Kuo et al. [18] reported, on a series of 1419 patients, a prevalence of multiple BCCs located in the head and neck region, in accordance with what has been previously reported by other authors [20]. On the contrary, in our experience, multiple BCCs developed more frequently on the back, whereas lesions located on the face or scalp were more commonly diagnosed in patients with a single tumor. Additionally, this finding agrees with the report of Bartos and Kullovà [21], who described multiple BCCs more commonly located in the trunk and upper limbs, and less frequently on the face. The concept of field cancerization [24] could justify this finding. Moreover, Zalaudek et al. [25] noticed similar clinical and dermoscopic characteristics in multiple BCCs arising in the same anatomical region on the same patient. Additionally, this “signature pattern” could be indicative of a concurrent and concomitant etiopathogenesis.

4.4. Histotypes

Several authors [18,26,27,28], report a significantly higher number of superficial BCCs among patients affected by multiple tumors. However, in our experience, nodular BCCs were the most frequent histotype. This discrepancy could be explained by the fact that our study was based on the analysis of medical records of patients undergoing surgery at our department: the gold standard for the treatment of nodular BCC is surgery, while many superficial BCCs could also be susceptible to conservative therapies [29,30,31]. For this reason, their actual incidence could be underestimated in our series. However, we decided not to exclude patients with histologies other than nodular from this study in order to have a more complete view of the extent of the multiple BCC phenomenon in immunocompetent patients. Furthermore, the inclusion of all histotypes has shown to have statistical significance, as demonstrated by the multivariate analysis. Based on our experience the hypothesis according to which patients with multiple BCCs are carriers of histotypes at lower risk than patients with a single BCC is not fully supportable. It is, however, interesting to note that more than half of patients with multiple BCCs develop tumors with the same histotype; this is further confirmation of a possible common etiopathogenetic origin. In our series, the presence of a nodular BCC at the first diagnosis has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor in determining the risk of multiple BCCs, as confirmed by the multivariate analysis.
Regarding the possible role of other skin cancers, Marcil and Stern [32] conducted a literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the occurrence of subsequent NMSC according to the type of the initial NMSC, demonstrating that patients with a history of SCC had an equivalent risk of developing BCC to patients with a history of BCC. Conversely, a previous BCC does not change the risk of developing SCC.

4.5. Endogenous Risk Factors

Male gender and a higher age at initial BCC diagnosis are associated with metachronous BCCs [6,8,17,18,19]. A statistically significant correlation between these clinical characteristics and the development of multiple BCC has also been demonstrated in our series, in which the percentage of males and the median age at diagnosis increase further in patients with more than two BCCs. These data are also in agreement with other previous reports; a retrospective analysis performed in 2017 identified multiple BCCs in the 19% of analyzed patients, with a mean number of tumors higher in males than in females (1.5 vs. 1.2) [2]. However, some aspects remain debated: among the risk factors reported by Bartos [21], the young age at diagnosis seems to play a favoring role. It is conceivable that, in these patients, specific genetic mutations favoring the onset of BCC may be identifiable, while in older patients the most relevant role is certainly played by the cumulative action of exogenous carcinogens, including chronic UV exposure.
With regards to gender, the male sex was significantly associated, not only generically with the development of BCC, but also more specifically with the risk of multiple lesions, in our sample. This could be justified by several elements, not only genetic but also cultural elements, such as more frequent outdoor work activities, with a consequential greater exposure to the sun, scarce photoprotection habits, and less adherence to skin self-examination behaviors.

4.6. Mutational Pattern

Whole-exome sequencing data from sporadic BCCs found that these tumors are the most mutated of any human cancer studied thus far, with a mutational profile of BCC consistent with UV-induced mutagenesis [33].
Constitutive activation of Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is the most common primary driver in both hereditary and sporadic BCCs (reviewed in [34,35]). Germline inactivation of one copy of the Hh receptor Patched 1 (PTCH1) gene [36] and, more rarely, of PTCH2 [37], or of Suppressor of Fused (SUFU) [38], followed by the somatic loss of the second allele results in Gorlin syndrome [12] that are frequently observed in BCC patients. Furthermore, UV-induced mutations of genes encoding for Hh pathway components were identified in about 85% of sporadic BCCs [33,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Based on this evidence, the Hh pathway has become a major target for molecular therapies aimed to inhibit BBC growth, mainly through the inactivation of the Hh effector SMO (i.e., vismodegib, sonidegib, patidegib, and itraconazole) [45]. Very recently, the generation and characterization of simple BCC mouse models have unveiled key mechanisms for BCC progression, possibly related to multiple BCCs [46]. Canonical mutations that activate upstream Hh signaling are necessary, but secondary mutations that further hyperactivate downstream Hh signaling (including the amplification of Gli1/2 and upregulation of N-Myc signaling) are required in those models to escape dormancy and produce uncontrolled expansion [46].
In addition, disruption of other cancer-associated pathways may confer an increased risk for BCCs and possibly contribute to the development of multiple BCCs. Due to the critical role of UV irradiation in the pathogenesis of BCC [47], the alteration of DNA repair mechanisms has been investigated as additional driver mutations. As expected, reduced DNA repair capacity for UV–induced DNA damage is present in most BCCs and this defect is an independent risk factor for BCC [39]; furthermore, the inherited common variation in some DNA repair genes has been correlated to the development of BCCs [48,49,50]. Other mutated pathways, which may represent additional drivers, are the p53 (61% of BCCs), the N-Myc (30%), the Hippo-YAP (8%), the EGFR (4%), and the RAS (2%) pathways [33,51].
Recently, a correlation between non-melanoma skin cancer and immunosurveillance has started to be investigated. In particular, the efficiency of local immune surveillance of the cutis may limit the rate of appearance of multiple BCCs. Toward this hypothesis, mounting evidence points to an association between stemness and cancer immune evasion and resistance [52]. Recently, an integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing data has identified a gene signature that may represent a robust link between cancer stemness and immunotherapy resistance for several cancers, including BCC [53].

4.7. Exogenous Risk Factors

Photoexposure habits may justify the different incidence of multiple BCCs and the involvement of different anatomical sites in various geographic areas [8,27,28,54]. However, although the chronic photoexposure is a major risk factor for the onset of NMSCs, the actual role of the sun in the development of multiple BCCs is still debated [8,18,55,56]. Sunburn after the age of 60 has been shown to be an independent factor significantly associated with multiple BCCs [56], and sun exposure was also confirmed to be the main risk factor for the occurrence of multiple or recurrent BCCs in a large case series recently published in Italy [57]. However, no relationship between pigment status or UV-related characteristics (easily sunburned, outdoor work, and sun protection) and the development of a second BCC has been demonstrated in other studies [19,27,28] in line with our experience. However, a limitation of our study is represented by the fact that questionnaires administered to patients considered only sun exposure related to outdoor work activity, whereas that related to recreational or outdoor activities was not investigated. Furthermore, the assessment of the extent of the photoexposure and of any previous sun burns was carried out on the basis of anamnestic data, and probably underestimated.
The literature also suggests that radiotherapy [58], especially if administered at high doses and on previously photo-damaged skin, and chemicals, such as arsenic and hydrazine (mostly used as agricultural chemicals or as a corrosion inhibitor in heating systems) [59] can play a putative role in etiopathogenesis of multiple BCCs. In our case series, we investigate a possible correlation with smoking or chronic diseases that could potentially down-regulate the immune system activity, but we have not proven any significant relationship. Interestingly, a recent study suggested that coffee consumption reduced the risk of a second BCC [60]. This observation is supported by experimental evidence showing that, in mice, oral and topical administration of caffeine inhibits UVB-induced carcinogenesis and selectively increase apoptosis in NMSCs [61].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the development of multiple BCCs in immunocompetent patients is a frequent, often underestimated event. Therefore, the identification of the higher risk subjects is essential for the development of specific health educational and surveillance programs, also with a view to resources optimization. In the literature [40,51], it has been proposed that the strongest predictor of further BCCs is the presence of more than one BCC at initial diagnosis. In our experience, a patient’s gender and age (i.e., male and elderly), and tumor histotype and localization (i.e., nodular and face), also depict the phenotype at higher risk for development of multiple lesions. In these subjects, the cumulative exposure to UV radiation represents a possible additional risk factor, while the role of somatic mutations is still to be definitively clarified.
Our experience, in agreement with the literature data [40,51], confirms that most subsequent BCCs develop within 1 year from the first diagnosis; however, the non-inconsistent percentage of multiple BCCs diagnosed after 5 and even 10 years [18] makes the long-term continuation of this follow-up mandatory. In fact, only the identification of new BCCs as early as possible allow the use of conservative therapeutic modalities, and reduce the need for invasive or complex surgical procedures (i.e., Mohs surgery), resulting in less discomfort for the patient and savings in health spending.
Among the possible therapeutic alternatives, based on the high frequency of mutations, systemic treatment with hedgehog pathway inhibitors has also been proposed in non-syndromic patients affected by multiple BCCs. A subgroup of patients with these characteristics was included both in the pivotal phase 2 registration study ERIVANCE BCC [62], and in the randomized phase 2 trial MIKIE, that assessed the safety and activity of two long-term intermittent vismodegib dosing regimens [63]. Moreover, in 2020, Verkouteren et al. [64] conducted a retrospective cohort study, also including two high-frequency BCC patients. However, the effectiveness of the drug in this specific patient’s subset needs to be still clarified.

Author Contributions

P.S., E.Z. and O.C. conceived and designed the papers; F.V., V.T., L.C. and E.Z. performed the experiments; P.S., E.Z., F.V., L.C., V.T. and O.C. analyzed the data; P.S., E.Z. and O.C. wrote the paper. All the authors read critically and approved the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of AOU Maggiore della Carità di Novara (protocol code 149/17, 1 August 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study is available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant (RF-2011-02347709) from “Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata—Ministero della Salute”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Leiter, U.; Eigentler, T.; Garbe, C. Epidemiology of skin cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 810, 120–140. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Trakatelli, M.; Barkitzi, K.; Apap, C.; Majewski, S.; De Vries, E.; EPIDERM Group. Skin cancer risk in outdoor workers, A European multicenter case-control study. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2016, 3, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Niwa, A.B.M.; Pimentel, E.R.A. Carcinoma basocelular em localizações incomuns. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2006, 81, S281–S284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wisgerhof, H.C.; Edelbroek, J.R.; de Fijter, J.W.; Haasnoot, G.W.; Claas, F.H.; Willemze, R.; Bavinck, J.N. Subsequent squamous- and basal-cell carcinomas in kidney-transplant recipients after the first skin cancer, Cumulative incidence and risk factors. Transplantation 2010, 89, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jiyad, Z.; Olsen, C.M.; Burke, M.T.; Isbel, N.M.; Green, A.C. Azathioprine and Risk of Skin Cancer in Organ Transplant Recipients, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Transplant. 2016, 16, 3490–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Garritsen, F.M.; Van der Schaft, J.; Van den Reek, J.M.; Politiek, K.; Van Osmedendorp, H.; Van Dijk, M.; Hijnen, D.J.; De Graaf, M.; Bruijnzeel-Koomen, C.A.; De Jong, E.M.; et al. Risk of non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with Atopic Dermatitis treated with oral immunosuppressive drugs. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2017, 97, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Schreiber, M.M.; Moon, T.E.; Fox, S.H.; Davidson, J. The risk of developing subsequent nonmelanoma skin cancers. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1990, 23, 1114–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Karagas, M.R.; Stukel, T.A.; Greenberg, E.R.; Baron, J.A.; Mott, L.A.; Stern, R.S. Risk of subsequent basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin among patients with prior skin cancer. JAMA 1992, 267, 3305–3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marghoob, A.; Kopf, A.W.; Bart, R.S.; Sanfilippo, L.; Silverman, M.K.; Lee, P.; Levy, E.; Vossaert, K.A.; Yadav, S.; Abadir, M. Risk of another basal cell carcinoma developing after treatment of a basal cell carcinoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1993, 28, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Flohil, S.C.; van der Leest, R.J.; Arends, L.R.; de Vries, E.; Nijsten, T. Risk of subsequent cutaneous malignancy in patients with prior keratinocyte carcinoma, A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 2365–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, S.; Mahajan, B.B.; Kaur, S.; Yadav, A.; Singh, N.; Singh, A. A Study of Basal Cell Carcinoma in South Asians for Risk Factor and Clinicopathological Characterization, A Hospital Based Study. J. Skin Cancer 2014, 2014, 173582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gorlin, R.J. Nevoid basal cell carcinoma (Gorlin) syndrome. Genet. Med. 2004, 6, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Schierbeck, J.; Vestergaard, T.; Bygum, A. Skin cancer associated genodermatoses, A literature review. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2019, 99, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Happle, R. Nonsyndromic type of hereditary multiple basal cell carcinoma. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2000, 95, 161–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De la Fouchardièrea, A.; Cabaretb, O.; Savinc, L.; Combemaled, P.; Schvartze, H.; Penetf, C.; Bonadonag, V.; Soufirh, N.; Bressac de Paillerets, B. Germline BAP1 mutations predispose also to multiple basal cell carcinomas. Clin. Genet. 2015, 88, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Iwamoto, I.; Endo, M.; Kakinuma, H.; Suzuki, H. Multiple basal cell carcinoma developing two years after 60Co irradiation. Eur. J. Dermatol. 1998, 8, 180–182. [Google Scholar]
  17. Flohil, S.C.; Koljenovic’, S.; de Haas, E.R.M.; Overbeek, L.I.H.; de Vries, E.; Nijsten, T. Cumulative risks and rates of subsequent basal cell carcinomas in the Netherlands. Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 165, 874–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kuo, K.J.; Batra, P.; Cho, H.G.; Li, S.; Chalal, H.S.; Rieger, K.E.; Tang, J.Y.; Sarin, K.Y. Correlate of multiple basal cell carcinoma in a retrospective cohort study, Sex, histologic subtypes and anatomic distribution. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2017, 8, 233–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Richmond-Sinclair, N.M.; Pandeya, N.; Williams, G.M.; Neale, R.E.; van der Pols, J.C.; Green, A.C. Clinical signs of photodamage are associated with basal cell carcinoma multiplicity and site, A 16-year longitudinal study. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 2622–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Čeović, R.; Smolković, N.; Pašić, A.; Kostović, K.; Hrsan, D. Multiple basal cell carcinomas of lower legs with stasis dermatitis, A therapeutic challenge. Acta Dermatovenerol. Croat. 2012, 20, 191–196. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bartos, V.; Kullovà, M. Basal Cell Carcinoma Multiplicity—A Retrospectiv Analysis of 899 Biopsy-proven Patients from a Single Institute. Klin. Onkol. Summer 2017, 30, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schreuder, K.; Hollestein, L.; Nijsten, T.C.E.; Wakkee, M.; Louwman, M.W.J. A nationwide study of the incidence and trends of first and multiple basal cell carcinomas in the Netherlands and prediction of future incidence. Br. J. Dermatol. 2022, 186, 476–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zavattaro, E.; Fava, P.; Veronese, F.; Cavaliere, G.; Ferrant, D.; Cantaluppi, V.; Ranghino, A.; Biancone, L.; Fierro, M.T.; Savoia, P. Identification of Risk Factors for Multiple Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers in Italian Kidney Transplant Recipients. Medicina 2019, 55, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Philipp-Dormston, W.G. Field cancerization, From molecular basis to selective field-directed management of actinic keratosis. Curr. Probl. Dermatol. 2015, 46, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zalaudek, I.; Moscarella, E.; Longo, C.; de Pace, B.; Argenziano, G. The “Signature” Pattern of Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas. Arch. Dermatol. 2012, 148, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bartos, V. Development of Multiple-Lesion Basal Cell Carcinomaof the Skin, A Comprehensive Review. Med. Bull. Sisli. Etfal. Hosp. 2019, 53, 323–328. [Google Scholar]
  27. Verkouteren, J.A.C.; Smedinga, H.; Steyerberg, E.W.; Hofman, A.; Nijsten, T. Predicting the Risk of a Second Basal Cell Carcinoma. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 2649–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lovatt, T.J.; Lear, J.T.; Bastrilles, J.; Wong, C.; Griffiths, C.E.; Samarasinghe, V.; Roebuck, J.; Ramachandran, S.; Smith, A.G.; Jones, P.W.; et al. Associations between ultraviolet radiation, basal cell carcinoma site and histology, host characteristics, and rate of development of further tumors. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2005, 52, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cohen, D.K.; Lee, P.K. Photodynamic Therapy for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers. Cancers 2016, 8, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bettencourt, M.S. Treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma with ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05%. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2016, 9, 205–209. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kelleners-Smeets, N.W.; Mosterd, K.; Nelemans, P.J. Treatment of Low-Risk Basal Cell Carcinoma. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 539–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Marcil, I.; Stern, R.S. Risk of developing a subsequent nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer, A critical review of the literature and meta-analysis. Arch. Dermatol. 2000, 136, 1524–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Bonilla, K.; Parmentier, L.; King, B.; Bezrukov, F.; Kaya, G.; Zoete, V.; Seplyarskiy, V.B.; Sharpe, H.J.; McKee, T.; Letourneau, A.; et al. Genomic analysis identifies new drivers and progression pathways in skin basal cell carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Marzuka, A.G.; Book, S.E. Basal cell carcinoma, Pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, histopathology, and management. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2015, 88, 167–179. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dika, E.; Sarfì, F.; Ferracin, M.; Broseghini, E.; Marcelli, E.; Bortolani, B.; Campione, E.; Riefolo, M.; Ricci, C.; Lambertini, M. Basal Cell Carcinoma, A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hahn, H.; Wicking, C.; Zaphiropoulous, P.G.; Gailani, M.R.; Shanley, S.; Chidambaram, A.; Vorechovsky, I.; Holmberg, E.; Unden, A.B.; Gillies, S.; et al. Mutations of the human homolog of Drosophila patched in the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Cell 1996, 85, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Fan, Z.; Li, J.; Du, J.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Y.; Wang, C.Y.; Wang, S. A missense mutation in PTCH2 underlies dominantly inherited NBCCS in a Chinese family. Med. Genet. 2008, 45, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Smith, M.J.; Beetz, C.; Williams, S.G.; Bhaskar, S.S.; O’Sullivan, J.; Anderson, B.; Daly, S.B.; Urquhart, J.E.; Bholah, Z.; Oudit, D.; et al. Germline mutations in SUFU cause Gorlin syndrome-associated childhood medulloblastoma and redefine the risk associated with PTCH1 mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 4155–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jayaraman, S.S.; Rayhan, D.J.; Hazany, S.; Kolodney, M.S. Mutational landscape of basal cell carcinomas by whole-exome sequencing. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gailani, M.R.; Ståhle-Bäckdahl, M.; Leffell, D.J.; Glynn, M.; Zaphiropoulos, P.G.; Pressman, C.; Undén, A.B.; Dean, M.; Brash, D.E.; Bale, A.E.; et al. The role of the human homologue of Drosophila patched in sporadic basal cell carcinomas. Nat. Genet. 1996, 14, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Urman, N.M.; Mirza, A.; Atwood, S.X.; Whitson, R.J.; Sarin, K.Y.; Tang, J.Y.; Oro, A.E. Tumor-Derived Suppressor of Fused Mutations Reveal Hedgehog Pathway Interactions. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xie, J.; Murone, M.; Luoh, S.M.; Ryan, A.; Gu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Bonifas, J.M.; Lam, C.W.; Hynes, M.; Goddard, A.; et al. Activating Smoothened mutations in sporadic basal-cell carcinoma. Nature 1998, 391, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rodriguez-Acevedo, J.A.; Antonsson, A.; Liyanage, U.E. Associations of keratinocyte cancers with snp variants in the sonic hedgehog pathway. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Park, H.S.; Papanastasi, E.; Blanchard, G.; Chiticariu, E.; Bachmann, D.; Plomann, M.; Morice-Picard, F.; Vabres, P.; Smahi, A.; Huber, M.; et al. ARP-T1-associated Bazex-Dupré-Christol syndrome is an inherited basal cell cancer with ciliary defects characteristic of ciliopathies. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gutzmer, R.; Solomon, J.A. Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition for the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma. Target. Oncol. 2019, 14, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Trieu, G.J.; Tsai, S.Y.; Eberl, M.; Ju, V.; Ford, N.C.; Doane, O.J.; Peterson, J.K.; Veniaminova, N.A.; Grachtchouk, M.; Harms, P.H.; et al. Basal cell carcinomas acquire secondary mutations to overcome dormancy and progress from microscopic to macroscopic disease. Cell Rep. 2022, 39, 110779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, L.E.; Li, C.; Strom, S.S.; Goldberg, L.H.; Brewster, A.; Guo, Z.; Qiao, Y.; Clayman, G.L.; Lee, J.J.; El-Naggar, A.K.; et al. Repair capacity for UV light induced DNA damage associated with risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer and tumor progression. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 6532–6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sugitani, N.; Sivley, R.M.; Perry, K.E.; Capra, J.A.; Chazin, W.J. XPA, A key scaffold for human nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair 2016, 44, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chen, S.; Geng, X.; Syeda, M.Z.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Ying, S. Human MUS81, A Fence-Sitter in Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 657305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lin, Y.; Chahal, H.S.; Wu, W.; Cho, H.G.; Ransohoff, K.J.; Song, F.; Tang, F.Y.; Sarin, K.Y.; Han, J. Association study of genetic variation in DNA repair pathway genes and risk of basal cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 141, 952–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kilgour, K.M.; Jia, J.L.; Sarin, K.Y. Review of the Molecular Genetics of Basal Cell Carcinoma; Inherited Susceptibility, Somatic Mutations, and Targeted Therapeutics. Cancers 2021, 13, 3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bayik, D.; Lathia, J.D. Cancer stem cell-immune cell crosstalk in tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2021, 21, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.X.; Chen, Y.Z.; Wu, H.X.; Yin, L.; Zhao, Q.; Luo, H.Y.; Zeng, Z.L.; Qiu, M.Z.; Xu, R.H. Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing data reveals a pan-cancer stemness signature predicting immunotherapy response. Genome Med. 2022, 14, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Graells, J. The risk and risk factors of a second non-melanoma skin cancer, A study in a Mediterranean population. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2004, 18, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kiiski, V.; de Vries, E.; Flohil, S.C.; Bijl, M.J.; Hofman, A.; Stricker, B.H.; Nijsten, T. Risk factors for single and multiple basal cell carcinomas. Arch. Dermatol. 2010, 146, 848–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wallberg, P.; Kaaman, T.; Lindberg, M. Multiple basal cell carcinoma. A clinical evaluation of risk factors. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1998, 78, 127–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Gaspari, V.; Patrizi, A.; Venturi, M.; Misciali, C.; Fanti, P.A. The epidemic spreading of basal cell carcinoma, Incidence trend, demographic features, characteristics and risk factors in a retrospective study of 8557 lesions in Bologna. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 155, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oken, M.M.; Creech, R.H.; Torney, D.C.; Horton, J.; Davis, T.E.; McFadden, E.T.; Carbone, P.P. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1983, 5, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Aigner, A.B.; Darsow, U.; Grosber, M.; Ring, J.; Plötz, S.G. Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas after Long-Term Exposure to Hydrazine, Case Report and Review of the Literature. Dermatology 2010, 221, 300–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Caini, S.; Cattaruzza, S.; Bendinelli, B.; Tosti, G.; Masala, G.; Gnagnarella, P.; Assedi, M.; Stanganelli, I.; Palli, D.; Gandini, S. Coffee, tea and caffeine intake and the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer, A review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Nutr. 2017, 56, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lu, Y.P.; Lou, Y.R.; Xie, J.G.; Peng, Q.Y.; Liao, J.; Yang, C.S.; Huang, M.T.; Conney, A.H. Topical applications of caffeine or (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) inhibit carcinogenesis and selectively increase apoptosis in UVB-induced skin tumors in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 12455–12460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Sekulic, A.; Migden, M.R.; Lewis, K.; Hainsworth, J.D.; Solomon, J.A.; Yoo, S.; Arron, S.T.; Friedlander, P.A.; Marmur, E.; Rudin, C.M.; et al. Pivotal ERIVANCE basal cell carcinoma (BCC) study, 12-month update of efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced BCC. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2015, 72, 1021–1026.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dréno, B.; Kunstfeld, R.; Hauschild, A.; Fosko, S.; Zloty, D.; Labeille, B.; Grob, J.J.; Puig, S.; Gilberg, F.; Bergström, D.; et al. Two intermittent vismodegib dosing regimens in patients with multiple basal-cell carcinomas (MIKIE), A randomised, regimen- controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 18, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Verkouteren, B.J.A.; Wakkee, M.; Reyners, A.K.L.; Nelemans, P.; Aarts, M.J.B.; Racz, E.; Terra, J.B.; Devriese, L.A.; Alers, R.J.; Kapiteijn, E.; et al. Eight years of experience with vismodegib for advanced and multiple basal cell carcinoma patients in the Netherlands, A retrospective cohort study. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 124, 1199–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients affected by BCC.
Table 1. Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients affected by BCC.
No. of pts2140
Age * (median, range)73.8 (20–101)
Females1273 (59.5%)
Males867 (40.5%)
Head60.9%
Nose517 (26.7%)
Ear223 (11.5%)
Scalp197 (10.2%)
Eyelid179 (9.2%)
Lips56 (2.9%)
Others764 (39.5%)
Back620 (19.2%)
Chest329 (10.2%)
Legs174 (5.4%)
Arms163 (5%)
Histotype
Nodular2086 (64.7%)
Superficial679 (21.1%)
Morphea-like282 (8.7%)
Basosquamous61 (1.9%)
Cystic58 (1.8%)
Other56 (1.7%)
* At first diagnosis of BCC.
Table
Table 2. Patients affected by multiple BCC.
Table 2. Patients affected by multiple BCC.
No. of TumorsPatients
2281 (55.5%)
3108 (21.3%)
448 (9.5%)
528 (5.5%)
618 (3.6%)
710 (2%)
83 (0.6%)
96 (1.2%)
103 (0.6%)
111 (0.2%)
Table
Table 3. Clinical characteristics of patients with single or multiple BCCs.
Table 3. Clinical characteristics of patients with single or multiple BCCs.
Single BCCMultiple BCCs2 BCCs3 BCCs4 BCCs>4 BCCs
No. of pts15885062811084869
Age *
(median, range)		71
(20–101)		75
(33–97)		75
(33–97)		75
(40–90)		77
(43–93)		74
(39–92)
Gender
Female734 (46.2%)168 (33.2%)106 (37.7%)30 (27.7%)15 (31.25%)17 (24.3%)
Male854 (53.8%)338 (66.8%)175 (62.3%)78 (72.3%)33 (68.75%)52 (75.7)
p < 0.01
Anatomical site °
Head680 (42.8%)470 (31%)28 (9.9%)4 (3.7%)1 (2%)0
Nose333 (48.9%)172 (36.6%)17 (60.7%)1 (25%)00
Ear101 (14.8%)118 (25.1%)3 (10.7%)2 (59%)00
Scalp92 (13.5%)103 (21.9%)2 (7.1%)1 (25%)10
Eyelid121 (17.7%)55 (11.7%)6 (21.4%)000
Lips33 (4.8%)22 (4.6%)0000
Neck376 (23.6%)389 (25.6%)29 (10.3%)4 (3.7%)00
Back248 (15.6%)327 (21.6%)20 (7.11%)8 (7.4%)2 (4%)2 (2.9%)
Chest146 (9.2%)157 (10.3%)9 (3.2%)1 (0.9%)00
Legs73 (4.6%)90 (5.9%)1 (0.003%)3 (2.7%)1 (2%)0
Arms65 (4%)83 (5.4%)1(0.003%)000
Timing of BCCs
Synchronous/190 (37.5%)149 (53%)34 (31.5%)6 (12.5%)1 (1.4%)
Less than 1 year §/170 (33.5%)68 (24.2%)36 (33.3%)18 (37.5%)48 (69.5%)
1 year < 3 §/118 (23.3%)53 (18.9%)31 (28.7%)16 (33.3%)18 (26%)
3 years < 5 §/28 (5.5%)11 (3.9%)7 (6.5%)8 (16.6%)2 (2.8%)
* At first BCC diagnosis; ° number of patients with 2 or more BCCs occurring in the same anatomical site; § from the first BCC diagnosis.
Table
Table 4. Histopathological features of patients with single or multiple BCCs.
Table 4. Histopathological features of patients with single or multiple BCCs.
Single BCC2 BCCs3 BCCs4 BCCs>4 BCCs
No. of pts
No. of lesions		1588
1588		281
562		108
324		48
192		69
438
Histotype (1st)
Nodular1084 (68.26%)274 1184681
Superficial249 (15.7%)83493248
Infiltrative216 (13.6%)56 27917
Basosquamous39 (2.4%)7 300
Histotype (2nd) *
Nodular/87573877
Superficial/34252031
Infiltrative/2112911
Basosquamous/0422
Histotype (3rd) *
Nodular//212257
Superficial//4527
Infiltrative//234
Basosquamous//003
Histotype (4th) *
Nodular///228
Superficial///117
Infiltrative///24
Basosquamous///11
* All synchronous lesions were considered together.
Table
Table 5. Risk factors for single or multiple BCCs.
Table 5. Risk factors for single or multiple BCCs.
Single BCCMultiple BCCs2 BCCs3 BCCs4 BCCs>4 BCCs
Phototype
I/II239 (53.9%)87 (56.1%)5116911
III184 (41.5%)66 (42.5%)3318510
IV20 (4.6%)2 (1.4%)2000
Sun exposure
Yes167 (14.3%)69 (16.9%)3814710
No999 (85.7%)337 (83.1%)188762944
Chronic diseases
Yes509 (43.6%)198 (48.7%)108451926
No657 (56.4%)208 (51.3%)118451728
Smoking
Yes172 (38.8%)58 (37.4%)341266
No271 (61.2%)97 (62.6%)5222815
Table
Table 6. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for the development of multiple BCCs.
Table 6. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for the development of multiple BCCs.
HR95% CIp
Gender
(M vs. F)		1.391.141–1.7030.001
Age
(>75, vs. <75)		1.011.008–1.023<0.001
Histology
(nodular, vs. others)		0.850.732–0.9880.034
Anatomical site
(face, vs. others)		1.541.335–1.795<0.001
Phototype
(I, II vs. III, IV)		0.9770.707.1.3490.88
Sun exposure
(yes, vs. no)		0.980.725–1.3460.988
Chronical diseases (yes, vs. no)1.180.969–1.4510.099
Smoking
(yes, vs. no)		0.970.696–1.3640.879
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Savoia, P.; Veronese, F.; Camillo, L.; Tarantino, V.; Cremona, O.; Zavattaro, E. Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas in Immunocompetent Patients. Cancers 2022, 14, 3211. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133211

AMA Style

Savoia P, Veronese F, Camillo L, Tarantino V, Cremona O, Zavattaro E. Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas in Immunocompetent Patients. Cancers. 2022; 14(13):3211. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Savoia, Paola, Federica Veronese, Lara Camillo, Vanessa Tarantino, Ottavio Cremona, and Elisa Zavattaro. 2022. "Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas in Immunocompetent Patients" Cancers 14, no. 13: 3211. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133211

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop