Next Article in Journal
Influenza Vaccination and Risk of Lung Cancer in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Two Decades of Brain Tumour Imaging with O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET: The Forschungszentrum Jülich Experience
Previous Article in Journal
19th International Symposium on Epstein–Barr Virus and Associated Diseases, 29–30 July 2021, Asahikawa, Japan
Previous Article in Special Issue
PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: An Update and Overview of a Rapidly Growing Area
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Radiotracers in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Ongoing Clinical Trials

1
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
2
John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
3
Department of Radiation Oncology, REM Radioterapia SRL, 95125 Viagrande, Italy
4
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
5
Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
6
Department of Medical Physics, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95021 Catania, Italy
7
National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95125 Catania, Italy
8
Department of Advanced Technologies, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95021 Catania, Italy
9
Department of Neurosurgery, Trauma Center, Gamma Knife Center, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95021 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(12), 2925; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14122925
Submission received: 26 April 2022 / Revised: 10 June 2022 / Accepted: 12 June 2022 / Published: 14 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical PET Studies in Neuro-Oncology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging has recently been introduced in the management of patients with brain tumors, mostly meningiomas and pituitary adenomas or carcinomas. The current literature demonstrated the superior diagnostic accuracy of this imaging modality, especially for lesions difficult to be detected or characterized on conventional imaging protocols, such as skull base or transosseous meningiomas. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers also seem to provide superior volume contouring for radiotherapy planning and may also be used to evaluate the tumor’s overexpression of somatostatin receptors for devising patient-tailored peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. In this review, we comprehensively analyzed the current literature discussing the implementation of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging in brain tumors, further presenting ongoing clinical trials and suggesting potential future applications.

Abstract

Background: The development of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers has garnered interest in neuro-oncology, to increase accuracy in diagnostic, radiation planning, and neurotheranostics protocols. We systematically reviewed the literature on the current uses of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in brain tumors. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to include published studies and ongoing trials utilizing [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in patients with brain tumors. Results: We included 63 published studies comprising 1030 patients with 1277 lesions, and 4 ongoing trials. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET was mostly used for diagnostic purposes (62.5%), followed by treatment planning (32.7%), and neurotheranostics (4.8%). Most lesions were meningiomas (93.6%), followed by pituitary adenomas (2.8%), and the DOTATOC tracer (53.2%) was used more frequently than DOTATATE (39.1%) and DOTANOC (5.7%), except for diagnostic purposes (DOTATATE 51.1%). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies were mostly required to confirm the diagnosis of meningiomas (owing to their high SSTR2 expression and tracer uptake) or evaluate their extent of bone invasion, and improve volume contouring for better radiotherapy planning. Some studies reported the uncommon occurrence of SSTR2-positive brain pathology challenging the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for meningiomas. Pre-treatment assessment of tracer uptake rates has been used to confirm patient eligibility (high somatostatin receptor-2 expression) for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) (i.e., neurotheranostics) for recurrent meningiomas and pituitary carcinomas. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies may revolutionize the routine neuro-oncology practice, especially in meningiomas, by improving diagnostic accuracy, delineation of radiotherapy targets, and patient eligibility for radionuclide therapies.

1. Introduction

Current imaging modalities for brain tumor diagnoses mainly comprise CT and/or MRI scans, which confer favorable sensitivity and specificity for outlining initial suspects of lesions [1,2]. However, CT and MRI scans may be insufficient to provide a detailed characterization of intracranial masses, in some cases requiring advanced imaging techniques for enhancing the differential diagnosis and supporting the pre-treatment planning of optimal therapeutic options. The increased advances and availability of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in oncology and neuro-oncology practices have encouraged the research and development of multiple PET radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and treatment purposes [1,2]. The use of radiolabeled amino acid PET tracers, which bind to specific tumor-expressed receptors, offers improved accuracy in defining the tumor-to-background contrast and in tailoring treatments [3]. More recently, Gallium-68 (68Ga) has attracted a lot of interest as an alternative positron emitter to the most common 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) [4]. 68Ga proved to be a versatile tool in several oncology and non-oncology applications, providing a short imaging time and cost-effective cyclotron-free production [5]. In particular, 68Ga-labeling of DOTA chelator-conjugated somatostatin analogs allows to detect and bind with high-affinity tumors expressing selected somatostatin receptors [6]. Among the different [68Ga]Ga-DOTA tracers, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC), [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotate ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE), and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Nal3-octreotide ([68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC) represent three of the most common agents currently used in PET imaging of neuroendocrine and central nervous system (CNS) tumors [7,8].
In neuro-oncology, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers have been mostly studied for meningiomas and pituitary adenomas [7,9]. Both pathologies show overexpression of somatostatin subtype receptors 2 (SSTR2), to which [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-chelator PET tracers are able to bind with strong affinity [10,11,12]. PET/CT and, more recently, hybrid PET/MRI systems, show a superior diagnostic accuracy compared to CT and MRI protocols, allowing a better detection and volume definition of skull base and transosseous meningiomas, and also post-surgery residual tumors [13,14,15,16]. With these premises, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET scans are frequently implemented as imaging adjuncts to guide surgical resection and radiation treatment planning of complex meningiomas, improving safe and effective target delineation [17,18,19,20]. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET scans may also be used to study the pretherapeutic tumor uptake of DOTA-chelator tracers and predict tumor response to targeted DOTA-labeled β-emitting radionuclides (i.e., neurotheranostics), as described for radiation-resistant meningiomas [21].
In this systematic review, we comprehensively summarized the various applications of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers in neuro-oncology practice, primarily focusing on their implementation in diagnostics, treatment planning, and neurotheranostics settings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Search

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [22] and registered to PROSPERO (CRD42022325392). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched from database inception to 7 April 2022, using the exact search query: [(Gallium-68 DOTATOC PET OR 68 GA-DOTATOC OR Gallium-68 DOTATATE OR 68GA-DOTATATE OR Gallium-68 DOTANOC OR 68GA-DOTANOC) AND (tumor OR oncology OR neoplasm)]. Articles were uploaded to Mendeley, and duplicates were deleted. ClinicalTrial.gov was then searched in the same fashion to identify ongoing clinical trials evaluating the use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies in patients with brain tumors.

2.2. Study Selection

A priori inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. Articles written in English were included if they described the use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging in patients with brain tumors for: (1) diagnostics purposes, (2) treatment planning, (3) eligibility for therapy with DOTA-tracers β-emitting radionuclides (i.e., neurotheranostics). Articles were excluded if they: (1) were literature reviews, cadaver studies, animal studies, or study protocols, (2) described different uses of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging not for brain tumors, (3) reported the use of different molecular nuclear medicine imaging techniques. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging defined the use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-chelator PET studies specifically targeting tissues and/or lesions expressing somatostatin receptors (SSTR).
Two independent authors (G.W. and C.O.) screened titles and abstracts of all collected articles, and then assessed full texts of studies that met inclusion criteria. Disagreements were settled by a third author (P.P.). Eligible articles were included upon the pre-specified criteria and references were searched to retrieve additional articles.

2.3. Data Extraction

Two independent reviewers (G.W. and C.O.) extracted data, which were then confirmed by an additional reviewer (P.P.). Missing data were not reported by the authors. Extracted data included: authors, year, the reason for the use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies, sample size, number of lesions, pathology and location, tracer and administered dose, SUV max, clinico-radiological findings.

2.4. Data Synthesis and Quality Assessment

The primary outcomes of interest were current applications of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies in patients with brain tumors and their impact on clinical practice. For each article, the level of evidence was appraised using the 2011 Oxford Centre For Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines [23]. A meta-analysis was precluded because all included studies had level IV evidence and hazard ratios could not be deducted. The risk of bias in each article was independently assessed by two authors (P.P. and G.F.) using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists for case reports and case series [24,25]. Continuous variables are summarized as medians or means and ranges, while categorical variables are reported as frequencies and percentages.

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

Figure 1 illustrates the literature search and study selection process. The initial search yielded 1606 published articles (PubMed: 803; Scopus: 673; Web of Science: 107; Cochrane: 23). A total of 63 studies were included with the a priori criteria: 25 were case reports and 38 were case series, categorized with levels of evidence IV and V, respectively [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. The second search returned 116 clinical trials, of which 4 ongoing trials were included [80,81,82,83]. A quality assessment resulted in a low risk of bias for all included articles, predisposing this review to an overall low risk of bias (Supplementary File S1).

3.2. Overview of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Studies in Neuro-Oncology

Table 1 summarizes and separates current applications of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in patients with brain tumors. A total of 1030 patients with 1277 lesions were included. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies were mostly implemented for diagnostic purposes in 644 patients (62.5%) with 867 lesions (67.9%), followed by radiotherapy/surgery planning in 337 patients (32.7%) with 356 lesions (27.9%), and by assessment of somatostatin receptor-2 (SSTR2) expression for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) (i.e., neurotheranostics) in 49 patients (4.8%) with 54 lesions (4.2%). Meningioma (total: 1196 lesions, 93.6%) comprised the most common pathology in all groups, followed by pituitary adenomas (total: 36 lesions, 2.8%). DOTATOC was the most frequent tracer used overall (total: 548 patients, 53.2%), but DOTATATE was used more in patients undergoing diagnostic [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies (329, 51.1%). Purandare et al. [54] described the use of DOTANOC tracer in 40 patients to differentiate meningiomas from dural-based brain metastases, and Pelak et al. [69] to delineate tumor volumes for proton therapy in 19 patients with grade-1 meningiomas. Seysthal et al. [21] lacked a clear distinction in the use of DOTATOC or DOTATATE, grouping all 20 of their patients in a single DOTATOC/DOTATATE group.

3.3. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Diagnostic Studies

Table 2 overviews all studies using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for diagnostic purposes in 644 patients with 867 lesions. Most lesions were meningiomas (93%), followed by pituitary adenomas (4.2%). Less common SSTR2-positive brain tumors were also described, including: brain metastases (15 patients, 1.7%) from breast cancer (6 patients) [54,55,64], neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) (2 patients) [70,76], gastric cancer (1 patient) [40], head and neck cancer (1 patient) [54], lymphoma (1 patient) [54], rectal cancer (1 patient) [54], renal cell carcinoma (1 patient) [54], thyroid cancer (1 patient) [48], and uterine cancer (1 patient) [54]; pituitary carcinomas (3 patients, 0.2%) [47,67,75]; granulomatous inflammation (2 patients, 0.2%) [40,42]; lymphoma (2 patients, 0.2%) [40,58]; glomus jugulare (1 patient, 0.1%) [73]; hemangioma (1 patient, 0.1%) [78]; and schwannoma (1 patient, 0.1%) [74]. DOTATATE (54.5%) was utilized more frequently than DOTATOC (45.5%). In meningiomas, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies were implemented to: (1) evaluate intraosseous or infracranial extension [15,31,79]; (2) detect lesions difficult-to-identify on MRI [30,63]; (3) differentiate residual/recurrent tumor tissue versus non-tumor tissue [14], such as surgical scarring [38] or post-therapy changes [53]; (4) confirm the diagnosis of meningiomas (high tracer uptake) [35,71,72] and differentiate those from other pathologies with lower tracer uptakes, both tumoral [44,54,55,58] and non-tumoral [40,42]; (5) stage recurrent or systemic disease [34,50,56]; (6) quantify tracer uptake (SSTR2 expression) [61,62,77] and match/mismatch with FDG uptake (metabolic rate) [35,52]; (7) evaluate postoperative extent of resection [60,65]; (8) predict tumor growth [45]; and appraise the diagnostic accuracy of hybrid PET/MRI scans [13,37,63]. In pituitary adenomas, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies were utilized to confirm biologically active post-surgical residual tumor tissue in concomitance with FDG PET/CT studies [16], or for differential diagnosis with synchronous meningiomas [44]. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET was used in the three patients with pituitary carcinomas to detect systemic metastases for disease staging [47,67,75].

3.4. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for Planning Radiotherapy Protocols and/or Surgical Resection

Table 3 reports all studies utilizing [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for planning radiotherapy protocols and/or surgical resection in 337 patients with 356 lesions. All lesions were meningiomas (99.7%), except for one pituitary carcinoma reported by d’Amico et al. [36]. DOTATOC (78.2%) was utilized more frequently than DOTATATE (21.8%), and Pelak et al. [69] also reported the use of DOTANOC in 19 patients. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies were mostly fused with CT/MRI studies and implemented to improve volume contouring for radiation planning, such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) [20,26,28,33], intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) [27,29], conventional radiotherapy [46,49,51,66], cyber knife radiosurgery (CKRS) [17,18], and carbon/proton therapy [32,69]. The implementation of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET proved to significantly improve target definition in meningiomas of the skull base, parafalcine, intraosseous, or affecting the optic nerve sheath, also favoring reduced radiation doses to adjacent organs at risk. Guinto-Nishimura et al. [19] registered and uploaded [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR studies to their neuronavigation system for intraoperative PET-guided meningioma resection. D’Amico et al. [36] reported improved target definition and contouring of a residual pituitary carcinoma infiltrating the right cavernous sinus.

3.5. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for Planning Neurotheranostics Therapy

Table 4 presents all studies using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for planning neurotheranostics therapy in 49 patients with 54 lesions. Most lesions were meningiomas (74.1%) followed by high-grade gliomas (22.2%) and pituitary carcinomas (3.7%). DOTATOC was used in 23 patients (46.9%), DOTATATE in 6 patients (12.2%), and unclear use of DOTATOC or DOTATATE was described in 20 patients (40.8%). 68Ga-DOTATATE PET studies were mostly utilized for assessing SSTR2 expression and eligibility for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy in both recurrent meningiomas [21] and pituitary carcinomas [41,68]. Collamati et al. [39] devised a pilot study on patients with meningiomas or high-grade gliomas to quantify [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC uptake by targeted tumors and estimate [90Y]Y-DOTATOC uptake, planning to develop a specific probe used for intraoperative radiotracer-guided tumor resection. Verburg et al. [57] evaluated selective intraarterial injection of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in meningiomas and compared tracer uptake rates to those following venous [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE infusion, with the goal of better evaluating eligibility for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with insufficient tracer uptake after venous [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE infusion.

3.6. Ongoing Clinical Trials Investigating [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in Neuro-Oncology

Four clinical trials are currently ongoing—three interventional [80,82,83] and one observational [81] (Table 5). The observational trial led by Ivanidze [81] is expected to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hybrid [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningiomas and other SSTR2-positive brain tumors compared to MRI alone, and secondarily correlate rates of tracer uptake to the expressions of SSTR2, Ki67, progesterone receptor, and EGFR. The interventional trial led by Johnson [82] is focused on appraising the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in residual meningiomas and measuring their metabolic response to radiotherapy. The interventional trial led by Merrell [83] proposes the use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI to assess meningioma eligibility for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy and simultaneously assess rates of progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Filipsson Nyström [80] is currently conducting the only interventional trial in patients with pituitary adenomas to quantify and compare rates of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC uptake between tumors and normal pituitary tissue, and secondarily to correlate tracer uptake rates to SSTR2 expression, to report adverse events, and to detect post-surgery tumor recurrences.

4. Discussion

A growing body of literature is currently focusing on analyzing the role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies in neuro-oncology, which have proved to be effective and safe for diagnostic and treatment planning purposes. However, the high variability in applications, SSTR2-positive diseases, and findings may pose some challenges in defining the pros and cons of their implementation in routine practice. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the current literature reporting the use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for brain tumors, hoping to assist all physicians involved in the multidisciplinary management of neuro-oncology patients.

4.1. PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR Radiotracers

Although multiparametric MRI represents the current imaging gold standard in primary and metastatic brain neoplasms, PET studies have the unique and complementary ability to evaluate and characterize the metabolic patterns within the tumor and non-tumor tissues through the use of selected radiolabeled tracers [84,85,86]. The roles of different PET tracers in tumor diagnosis and post-treatment response assessment have been largely discussed and validated by international consensuses and recommendations [87,88,89,90]. [18F]F-FDG and amino acid tracers (i.e., [11C]C-MET, [18F]F-FET, and [18F]F-FDOPA) are mostly used in patients with gliomas, brain metastases, and primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL). They show variable sensitivity and specificity in differentiating tumor tissue from the normal brain tissue, distinguishing post-treatment changes from tumor recurrences, and, more recently, predicting molecular patterns and patient prognosis when implemented for radiomics analyses [91,92]. In view of meningiomas’ overexpression of SSTR, especially SSTR2, [68Ga]Ga-labeled DOTA (i.e., somatostatin analogue) tracers targeting SSTR, primarily developed for neuroendocrine tumors, have been largely used to allow highly selected meningioma uptake, low healthy brain tissue uptake, and, thus, higher specificity in the tumor-to-background contrast with excellent tumor visualization [59,79]. To date, three radiotracers have been implemented in neuro-oncology: (1) DOTATATE, targeting SSTR2; (2) DOTATOC, targeting SSTR2 and SSTR5; and (3) DOTANOC targeting SSTR2, SSTR3, and SSTR5. Their main drawback pertains to 68Ga’s short half-life (68 min), which makes necessary the availability of highly expensive 68Ge/68Ga generators in-house or within easy reach. Yet, the lack of patient preparation, the easy tracer synthesis, and the superior diagnostic accuracy compared to other radiotracers, make [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET the preferred modality in SSTR-positive tumors, including meningiomas and pituitary neoplasms (Figure 2). In addition, newer hybrid PET/MRI systems have further improved the diagnostic performances of PET studies for brain tumors, combining PET high accuracy with MRI high morphological tumor visualization [13].

4.2. Diagnostic [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Studies

Since the study by Henze et al. [11] in 2001, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies have expanded beyond neuroendocrine neoplasms in neuro-oncology, primarily for meningiomas, with the goal to improve tumor detection, differentiation, and extent-of-infiltration. While most meningiomas are easily identifiable at standard MRIs by showing typical pathognomonic features, lesions with intraosseous extensions, invading the skull base, or adjacent to the falx cerebri, may pose some diagnostic challenges [63,93,94,95]. By selectively binding to SSTR, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR radiotracers allow for targeted uptake by SSTR-positive neoplasms and high tumor-to-background contrast, offering higher accuracy in evaluating the infracranial/transosseous extent of meningiomas infiltration and detection of synchronous lesions undetected by MRI studies [31,34]. This also provides improved accuracy in preoperatively differentiating suspected meningiomas from different lesions. As confirmed by Purandare et al. [54] and Unterrainer et al. [55], [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET can be effectively used to differentiate meningiomas against dural-based brain metastases, also when synchronous in the same patient, despite their largely similar imaging patterns at standard MRI studies. Similarly, Klingenstein et al. [40], Vay et al. [71], and Yarmohammadi et al. [72] proved that [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET may distinguish optic nerve sheath meningiomas from other non-tumor optic pathway lesions with higher accuracy than other imaging studies, allowing for prompt surgical/radiation planning on a case-by-case basis. However, in some cases, tumors may mimic meningiomas by presenting unexpected high tracer uptake, including PCNSLs [58] or brain metastases [64] (Figure 3). Hence, despite the promising results, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET should still be considered only as a valuable diagnostic adjunct complementary to preoperative MRI, suitable to aid the multidisciplinary management of neuro-oncological patients but required to be confirmed by histopathology reports.
Rachinger et al. [14] defined a diagnostic threshold of 2.3 for SUVmax to discriminate meningiomas from tumor-free tissue in both pre-treatment and post-treatment settings. Although their limited cohort (n = 21) appears insufficient to universally prove their findings, which would require further external validation with larger studies, their threshold has largely been used in the literature to differentiate residual or recurrent meningiomas from post-treatment changes, such as radiation necrosis, scarring, and pseudoprogression [38,53]. Similarly, post-operative [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET has also been studied to quantify the extent of meningioma resection in comparison to postoperative MRI and intraoperative Simpson grading, showing lower rates of false-negative and superior detection of tumor remnants [65]. From these findings, a newer “Copenhagen grading” system, including postoperative [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET and biopsy confirmation of peri-cavitary “areas of doubt”, has been preliminarily proposed to evaluate the completeness of meningioma resection.
The diagnostic role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies has also been investigated in pituitary adenomas and carcinomas, in view of their SSTR overexpression. As the normal pituitary gland is characterized by physiological tracer uptake, Zhao et al. [16] showed that combined 18F-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies may assist in postoperatively differentiate residual adenomas (high FDG uptake, low DOTA uptake) from the remaining functioning pituitary tissue (low FDG uptake, high DOTA uptake). In contrast, pituitary carcinomas present higher tracer uptake compared to the normal pituitary gland, with previous studies reporting high diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in confirming the diagnosis and enabling the detection of concurrent systemic metastases [43,47,67].

4.3. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for Planning Radiotherapy Protocols and/or Surgical Resection

Accurate tumor volume contouring and target definition are of vital importance for optimizing the planning of surgical resection and radiotherapy protocols. This is especially true in recurrent tumors, such as malignant meningiomas or pituitary carcinomas, characterized by aggressive invasive growth patterns, which often require high doses of radiation, and by post-treatment changes, which may pose some challenges in the delineation of target volumes using morphological imaging studies [96,97,98,99]. In addition, skull base meningiomas are frequently difficult to contour at contrast-MRI and/or CT, as the degree of bone/dura infiltration may be underestimated. As discussed above, PET elicits high tumor-to-background ratios by allowing the detection of receptor overexpression beyond the morphological extent of conventional imaging studies, offering a superior tumor visualization and target definition [100]. The use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for treatment planning has been first described by Milker-Zabel et al. [26], who imported and fused CT, MRI, and PET studies in their planning software for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). The authors compared planning target volumes (PTVs) on fused PET to those on CT/MRI only, reporting improved PTV delineation in 73% of patients after PET-fused planning, which better identified the transosseous extent of meningiomas. Comparable results were also obtained in other studies, which further reported [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET detection of additional information on meningiomas not detected at MRI [28,69] and superior target delineation of post-surgery/radiation meningioma recurrence from post-treatment tissue scarring or edema/pseudoprogression [27,29]. The role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for tumor volume contouring has been validated for FSRT [20,66], radiosurgery [17,18], and proton/carbon therapy [32,69] planning, optimizing PTV delineation, improving target dose escalation, and minimizing radiation to organs at risk, especially for the highly challenging optic nerve sheath meningiomas [18]. Likewise, d’Amico et al. [36] confirmed the potential benefits of using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for radiosurgery planning in pituitary carcinomas infiltrating the cavernous sinus, as it allows precise tumor contouring of residual post-surgery volumes.
In contrast to the well-described PET-guided glioma surgery [101], the use of intraoperative [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for navigation-guided meningioma resection has been less investigated. To date, only Guinto-Nishimura et al. [19] reported their experience with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET-guided resection of one primary intraosseous meningioma. In this technical note, the authors noted their ability to achieve gross total tumor removal by including in the resection peripheral bone areas showing high tracer uptake, which appeared macroscopically intact and extended beyond the tumor margins identified on the MRI. The postoperative pathology report confirmed the presence of tumor cells in the PET-positive peripheral bone and their absence in the specimen’s surgically resected margins. In addition, the fusion of PET/CT with MRI images, coupled with their integration with the navigation system, allowed for high accuracy for intraoperatively visualizing radiological anatomical structures and tumor margins, without altering the surgeon’s performance, compared to routine navigation-guided surgical protocols. Hence, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET-guided meningioma resection may be feasible and effective in challenging cases with great intraosseous and/or skull base extension, but further surgical studies should be conducted to analyze the surgical performances from multiple centers and operators.

4.4. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for Planning Neurotheranostics Therapy

Precision medicine approaches are constantly expanding in neuro-oncology to devise patient-tailored treatments directed against individual molecular and genetic profiles, responsible for the high intra-tumor and between-tumor heterogeneity, so as to selectively target cancer cells while minimizing damage to the healthy brain tissue [102]. The development of neurotheranostics in nuclear oncology follows the same path, identifying “theranostic pairs” composed of one diagnostic and one therapeutic nucleotide with identical target molecules [103]. At first, the diagnostic radiotracer selectively binds to specific target receptors to identify the tumor’s expression and molecular pathology. Secondarily, the therapeutic radionuclide is paired with the same tumor-specific biomarker and administered to deliver a dose-effective and selective radioablative dose only to the tumor tissue. Among the literature on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-based theranostic agents in neuro-oncology, the only validated theranostic pair is composed of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE (diagnostic) and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (therapeutic), clinically used for meningiomas [21] or pituitary carcinomas [41,68]. Recent studies confirmed that higher SSTR2 expression by targeted tumors (evidence with higher uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE) predicts longer and more favorable treatment responses [21,41,68]. Verburg et al. [57] also demonstrated that selective transfemoral intraarterial injection of DOTATATE significantly increased tracer uptake from meningiomas, which showed insufficient tracer uptake after standard venous infusion. This technique, which proved to be well tolerated and without any risk of complications, may be further implemented in selected patients with inoperable meningiomas to provide additional treatment options. Finally, although Collamati et al. [39] devised a pilot study to analyze the safety and effectiveness of the [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC and [90Y]Y-DOTATOC theranostic pair for radioguided high-grade glioma and meningioma resection, their findings still need to be externally validated before being implemented in clinical practice.

4.5. Ongoing Clinical Trials and Future Perspectives

Four ongoing clinical trials are currently evaluating [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in patients with meningiomas [82,83], pituitary adenomas [80], and other SSTR2-positive brain tumors [81]. Three trials are focused on analyzing [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR diagnostic accuracy: (1) compared to MRI for meningiomas [81]; (2) for distinguishing normal pituitary tissue versus pituitary tumors [80]; (3) for measuring post-radiation tumor response [82]; and/or (4) for correlating tracer uptake to SSTR2 expression and other tumor molecular patterns [80,81,82]. Separately, the trial led by Merrell aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of neurotheranostics ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE) for meningiomas in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. While the trial conducted by Filipsson Nyström [80] is set to include patients with primary untreated pituitary adenomas, the three other trials [81,82,83] are devised to involve patients with recurrent meningiomas, planning to receive radiation, and with radiologically measurable volumes. The findings achieved with these trials are expected to provide a more comprehensive and heterogeneous understanding of the benefits of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies for different populations. Future studies should also evaluate the role of intraoperative [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET-guided resection of skull base and transosseous meningiomas in terms of surgical feasibility, additional operating time, the extent of tumor resection, and its impact on postoperative patient performance status.

4.6. Limitations

Our review has some limitations. All included studies were retrospective case reports and case series likely exposed to selection bias. Owing to the recent introduction of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR in clinical settings and the reduced availability of studies currently published, we have also included many case reports. These case reports may limit any statistical evaluation of the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of this technique as of the current day, but offer valuable information on the several potential uses of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR in neuro-oncology. The high costs and recent development of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR tracers may have prevented the implementation of such a technique worldwide, limiting published studies and our findings only to experiences from a few selected institutions. Due to a lack of granular data, we could neither comprehensively assess differences in SUVmax rates among different tumors nor the impact of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies on post-treatment patient outcomes. Future studies should better analyze the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging compared to other imaging modalities for each type of brain tumor and how these studies impact the management of affected patients.

5. Conclusions

The recent development of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers in brain tumors has provided a valuable diagnostic adjunct primarily in the management of patients with meningiomas and pituitary adenomas/carcinomas. In particular, current routine applications of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging are shown to correlate with improved diagnostic accuracy, delineation of radiotherapy targets, and patient eligibility for radionuclide therapies. Ongoing trials are set to better define the diagnostic performance of these approaches, and future studies should evaluate the impact of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies for imaging-guided surgical tumor resections.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers14122925/s1, Supplementary File S1: Risk of bias assessments for all included studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.P. and G.E.U.; methodology, P.P.; validation, G.W., A.C., C.O. and G.F.; formal analysis, P.P.; resources, G.W., A.C., C.O., G.F., O.B.-A., A.S.H., M.G.S., G.C., S.C., M.I.; data curation, P.P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.P.; writing—review and editing, G.W., A.C., C.O., G.F., O.B.-A., A.S.H., M.G.S., G.C., S.C., M.I. and G.E.U.; visualization, P.P.; supervision, G.E.U.; project administration, P.P. and G.E.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tewson, T.J.; Krohn, K.A. PET radiopharmaceuticals: State-of-the-art and future prospects. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1998, 28, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Galldiks, N.; Langen, K.-J. Amino acid PET in neuro-oncology: Applications in the clinic. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2017, 17, 395–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Pimlott, S.L.; Sutherland, A. Molecular tracers for the PET and SPECT imaging of disease. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Martiniova, L.; De Palatis, L.; Etchebehere, E.; Ravizzini, G. Gallium-68 in Medical Imaging. Curr. Radiopharm. 2016, 9, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vorster, M.; Maes, A.; Van de Wiele, C.; Sathekge, M. Gallium-68: A systematic review of its nononcological applications. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2013, 34, 834–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Evangelista, L.; Ravelli, I.; Bignotto, A.; Cecchin, D.; Zucchetta, P. Ga-68 DOTA-peptides and F-18 FDG PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumor: A review. Clin. Imaging 2020, 67, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Valotassiou, V.; Leondi, A.; Angelidis, G.; Psimadas, D.; Georgoulias, P. SPECT and PET Imaging of Meningiomas. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 412580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Barrio, M.; Czernin, J.; Fanti, S.; Ambrosini, V.; Binse, I.; Du, L.; Eiber, M.; Herrmann, K.; Fendler, W.P. The Impact of Somatostatin Receptor–Directed PET/CT on the Management of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Boertien, T.M.; Drent, M.L.; Booij, J.; Majoie, C.B.L.M.; Stokkel, M.P.M.; Hoogmoed, J.; Pereira, A.; Biermasz, N.R.; Simsek, S.; Groote Veldman, R.; et al. The GALANT trial: Study protocol of a randomised placebo-controlled trial in patients with a 68 Ga -DOTATATE PET-positive, clinically non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma on the effect of lan reotide on t umour size. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e038250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schulz, S.; Pauli, S.U.; Schulz, S.; Händel, M.; Dietzmann, K.; Firsching, R.; Höllt, V. Immunohistochemical determination of five somatostatin receptors in meningioma reveals frequent overexpression of somatostatin receptor subtype sst2A. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 1865–1874. [Google Scholar]
  11. Henze, M.; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A.; Milker-Zabel, S.; Schuhmacher, J.; Strauss, L.G.; Doll, J.; Mäcke, H.R.; Eisenhut, M.; Debus, J.; Haberkorn, U. Characterization of 68Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide kinetics in patients with meningiomas. J. Nucl. Med. 2005, 46, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Iglesias, P.; Cardona, J.; Díez, J.J. The pituitary in nuclear medicine imaging. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2019, 68, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Wolf, M.B.; Kratochwil, C.; Giesel, F.L.; Combs, S.E.; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A.; Gnirs, R.; Roethke, M.C.; Schlemmer, H.P.; Haberkorn, U. Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems in patients with cranial meningioma: Initial results. Neuro. Oncol. 2015, 17, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rachinger, W.; Stoecklein, V.M.; Terpolilli, N.A.; Haug, A.R.; Ertl, L.; Pöschl, J.; Schüller, U.; Schichor, C.; Thon, N.; Tonn, J.-C. Increased 68 Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in PET Imaging Discriminates Meningioma and Tumor-Free Tissue. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kunz, W.G.; Jungblut, L.M.; Kazmierczak, P.M.; Vettermann, F.J.; Bollenbacher, A.; Tonn, J.C.; Schichor, C.; Rominger, A.; Albert, N.L.; Bartenstein, P.; et al. Improved Detection of Transosseous Meningiomas Using 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with Contrast-Enhanced MRI. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 1580–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zhao, X.; Xiao, J.; Xing, B.; Wang, R.; Zhu, Z.; Li, F. Comparison of 68Ga DOTATATE to 18F-FDG Uptake Is Useful in the Differentiation of Residual or Recurrent Pituitary Adenoma From the Remaining Pituitary Tissue After Transsphenoidal Adenomectomy. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2014, 39, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Acker, G.; Kluge, A.; Lukas, M.; Conti, A.; Pasemann, D.; Meinert, F.; Anh Nguyen, P.T.; Jelgersma, C.; Loebel, F.; Budach, V.; et al. Impact of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI on robotic radiosurgery treatment planning in meningioma patients: First experiences in a single institution. Neurosurg. Focus 2019, 46, E9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Graef, J.; Furth, C.; Kluge, A.K.; Acker, G.; Kord, M.; Zimmermann, Z.; Amthauer, H.; Makowski, M.; Loebel, F.; Vajkoczy, P.; et al. 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI—A Secure One-Stop Shop Imaging Tool for Robotic Radiosurgery Treatment Planning in Patients with Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma. Cancers 2021, 13, 3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guinto-Nishimura, G.Y.; Gómez-Amador, J.L.; Kerik-Rotenberg, N.; Uribe-Pacheco, R.; Sangrador-Deitos, M.V.; Martínez-Manrique, J.J. 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT–guided resection of a primary intraosseous meningioma: Technical note. Neurosurg. Focus 2021, 50, E6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mahase, S.S.; Roth O’Brien, D.A.; No, D.; Roytman, M.; Skafida, M.E.; Lin, E.; Karakatsanis, N.A.; Osborne, J.R.; Brandmaier, A.; Pannullo, S.C.; et al. [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI as an adjunct imaging modality for radiation treatment planning of meningiomas. Neuro-Oncol. Adv. 2021, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seystahl, K.; Stoecklein, V.; Schüller, U.; Rushing, E.; Nicolas, G.; Schäfer, N.; Ilhan, H.; Pangalu, A.; Weller, M.; Tonn, J.-C.; et al. Somatostatin-receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy for progressive meningioma: Benefit linked to 68 Ga-DOTATATE/-TOC uptake. Neuro. Oncol. 2016, 18, now060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jeremy, H.; Iain, C.; Paul, G.; Trish, G.; Carl, H.; Alessandro, L.; Ivan, M.; Bob, P.H.T. Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence (Background Document). Available online: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  24. Joanna, B. Institute Checklist for Case Reports. Available online: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  25. Joanna, B. Institute Checklist for Case Series. Available online: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  26. Milker-Zabel, S.; Zabel-du Bois, A.; Henze, M.; Huber, P.; Schulz-Ertner, D.; Hoess, A.; Haberkorn, U.; Debus, J. Improved target volume definition for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with intracranial meningiomas by correlation of CT, MRI, and [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2006, 65, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gehler, B.; Paulsen, F.; Öksüz, M.Ö.; Hauser, T.-K.; Eschmann, S.M.; Bares, R.; Pfannenberg, C.; Bamberg, M.; Bartenstein, P.; Belka, C.; et al. [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET/CT for meningioma IMRT treatment planning. Radiat. Oncol. 2009, 4, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Nyuyki, F.; Plotkin, M.; Graf, R.; Michel, R.; Steffen, I.; Denecke, T.; Geworski, L.; Fahdt, D.; Brenner, W.; Wurm, R. Potential impact of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT on stereotactic radiotherapy planning of meningiomas. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2010, 37, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thorwarth, D.; Henke, G.; Müller, A.-C.; Reimold, M.; Beyer, T.; Boss, A.; Kolb, A.; Pichler, B.; Pfannenberg, C. Simultaneous 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI for IMRT Treatment Planning for Meningioma: First Experience. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2011, 81, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Giesel, F.L.; Linhart, H.G.; Haberkorn, U.; Haufe, S.; Combs, S.E.; Podlesek, D.; Eisenhut, M.; Kratochwil, C. Detection of cranial meningiomas: Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Graf, R.; Plotkin, M.; Steffen, I.G.; Wurm, R.; Wust, P.; Brenner, W.; Budach, V.; Badakhshi, H. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and 68Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography for imaging skull base meningiomas with infracranial extension treated with stereotactic radiotherapy—A case series. Head Face Med. 2012, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Combs, S.E.; Welzel, T.; Habermehl, D.; Rieken, S.; Dittmar, J.-O.; Kessel, K.; Jäkel, O.; Haberkorn, U.; Debus, J. Prospective evaluation of early treatment outcome in patients with meningiomas treated with particle therapy based on target volume definition with MRI and 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET. Acta Oncol. 2013, 52, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Graf, R.; Nyuyki, F.; Steffen, I.G.; Michel, R.; Fahdt, D.; Wust, P.; Brenner, W.; Budach, V.; Wurm, R.; Plotkin, M. Contribution of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT to Target Volume Delineation of Skull Base Meningiomas Treated With Stereotactic Radiation Therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2013, 85, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Law, W.P.; Fiumara, F.; Fong, W.; Macfarlane, D.J. The ‘double pituitary hot spot’ sign of skull base meningioma on gallium-68-labelled somatostatin analogue PET. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2013, 57, 680–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yılmaz, S.; Ocak, M.; Asa, S.; Gülsen, F.; Halac, M.; Kabasakal, L. Appearance of intracranial meningioma in FDG and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Rev. Esp. Med. Nucl. Imagen Mol. 2013, 32, 60–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. d’Amico, A.; Stąpór-Fudzińska, M.; Tarnawski, R. CyberKnife Radiosurgery Planning of a Secreting Pituitary Adenoma Performed With 68Ga DOTATATE PET and MRI. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2014, 39, 1043–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Boss, A.; Bisdas, S.; Kolb, A.; Hofmann, M.; Ernemann, U.; Claussen, C.D.; Pfannenberg, C.; Pichler, B.J.; Reimold, M.; Stegger, L. Hybrid PET/MRI of Intracranial Masses: Initial Experiences and Comparison to PET/CT. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 1198–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Slotty, P.; Behrendt, F.; Cornelius, J.; Langen, K.-J. 68 Ga-DOTATATE-positron emission tomography imaging in spinal meningioma. J. Craniovertebr. Junction Spine 2014, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Collamati, F.; Pepe, A.; Bellini, F.; Bocci, V.; Chiodi, G.; Cremonesi, M.; De Lucia, E.; Ferrari, M.E.; Frallicciardi, P.M.; Grana, C.M.; et al. Toward Radioguided Surgery with β—Decays: Uptake of a Somatostatin Analogue, DOTATOC, in Meningioma and High-Grade Glioma. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Klingenstein, A.; Haug, A.R.; Miller, C.; Hintschich, C. Ga-68-DOTA-TATE PET/CT for Discrimination of Tumors of the Optic Pathway. Orbit 2015, 34, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Novruzov, F.; Aliyev, J.A.; Jaunmuktane, Z.; Bomanji, J.B.; Kayani, I. The Use of 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT for Diagnostic Assessment and Monitoring of 177Lu DOTATATE Therapy in Pituitary Carcinoma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015, 40, 47–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Taneja, S.; Jena, A.; Kaul, S.; Jha, A.; Sogani, S.K. uma. Somatostatin Receptor–Positive Granulomatous Inflammation Mimicking as Meningioma on Simultaneous PET/MRI. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015, 40, e71–e72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xiao, J.; Zhu, Z.; Zhong, D.; Ma, W.; Wang, R. Improvement in Diagnosis of Metastatic Pituitary Carcinoma by 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015, 40, e129–e131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Basu, S.; Ranade, R.; Hazarika, S. 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT of Synchronous Meningioma and Prolactinoma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2016, 41, 230–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sommerauer, M.; Burkhardt, J.-K.; Frontzek, K.; Rushing, E.; Buck, A.; Krayenbuehl, N.; Weller, M.; Schaefer, N.; Kuhn, F.P. 68 Gallium-DOTATATE PET in meningioma: A reliable predictor of tumor growth rate? Neuro Oncol. 2016, 18, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Maclean, J.; Fersht, N.; Sullivan, K.; Kayani, I.; Bomanji, J.; Dickson, J.; O’Meara, C.; Short, S. Simultaneous 68Ga DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Meningioma Target Contouring: Feasibility and Impact Upon Interobserver Variability Versus Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography/Magne. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 29, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Garmes, H.; Carvalheira, J.C.; Reis, F.; Queiroz, L.S.; Fabbro, M.; Souza, V.F.P.; Santos, A.O. Pituitary carcinoma: A case report and discussion of potential value of combined use of Ga-68 DOTATATE and F-18 FDG PET/CT scan to better choose therapy. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2017, 8, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Unterrainer, M.; Ilhan, H.; Todica, A.; Bartenstein, P.; Albert, N.L. Epidural Metastases From Follicular Thyroid Cancer Mimicking Meningiomas in 68Ga-DOTATATE PET. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2017, 42, 805–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stade, F.; Dittmar, J.-O.; Jäkel, O.; Kratochwil, C.; Haberkorn, U.; Debus, J.; Combs, S.E. Influence of 68Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: Differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy. Radiat. Oncol. 2018, 13, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Villanueva-Meyer, J.E.; Magill, S.T.; Lee, J.C.; Umetsu, S.E.; Flavell, R.R. Detection of Metastatic Meningioma to the Liver Using 68Ga-DOTA-Octreotate PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2018, 43, e338–e340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zollner, B.; Ganswindt, U.; Maihöfer, C.; Corradini, S.; Albert, N.L.; Schichor, C.; Belka, C.; Niyazi, M. Recurrence pattern analysis after [68Ga]-DOTATATE-PET/CT -planned radiotherapy of high-grade meningiomas. Radiat. Oncol. 2018, 13, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dressen, M.S.; Muthukrishnan, A.; Tragon, T.R.; Lieberman, F.S.; Mountz, J.M. Complementary Molecular and Metabolic Characterization of Meningiomas with DOTATATE and FDG-PET. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2019, 44, e26–e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ivanidze, J.; Roytman, M.; Lin, E.; Magge, R.S.; Pisapia, D.J.; Liechty, B.; Karakatsanis, N.; Ramakrishna, R.; Knisely, J.; Schwartz, T.H.; et al. Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET in the Evaluation of Intracranial Meningiomas. J. Neuroimaging 2019, 29, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Purandare, N.C.; Puranik, A.; Shah, S.; Agrawal, A.; Gupta, T.; Moiyadi, A.; Shetty, P.; Shridhar, E.; Patil, V.; Rangarajan, V. Differentiating dural metastases from meningioma. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2020, 41, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Unterrainer, M.; Ruf, V.; Ilhan, H.; Vettermann, F.J.; Cyran, C.C.; Niyazi, M.; Bartenstein, P.; Tonn, J.-C.; Albert, N.L. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT Differentiates Meningioma From Dural Metastases. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2019, 44, 412–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Unterrainer, M.; Ilhan, H.; Vettermann, F.; Cyran, C.C.; Tonn, J.C.; Niyazi, M.; Bartenstein, P.; Albert, N.L. Whole-Body Staging of Metastatic Atypical Meningioma Using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2019, 44, 227–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Verburg, F.A.; Wiessmann, M.; Neuloh, G.; Mottaghy, F.M.; Brockmann, M.-A. Intraindividual comparison of selective intraarterial versus systemic intravenous 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with inoperable meningioma. Nuklearmedizin. 2019, 58, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bashir, A.; Broholm, H.; Clasen-Linde, E.; Vestergaard, M.B.; Law, I. Pearls and Pitfalls in Interpretation of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET Imaging. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2020, 45, e279–e280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bashir, A.; Vestergaard, M.B.; Binderup, T.; Broholm, H.; Marner, L.; Ziebell, M.; Fugleholm, K.; Mathiesen, T.; Kjær, A.; Law, I. Pharmacokinetic analysis of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET in meningiomas for assessment of in vivo somatostatin receptor subtype 2. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 47, 2577–2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ueberschaer, M.; Vettermann, F.J.; Forbrig, R.; Unterrainer, M.; Siller, S.; Biczok, A.-M.; Thorsteinsdottir, J.; Cyran, C.C.; Bartenstein, P.; Tonn, J.-C.; et al. Simpson Grade Revisited—Intraoperative Estimation of the Extent of Resection in Meningiomas Versus Postoperative Somatostatin Receptor Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Neurosurgery 2020, 88, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Assadi, M.; Rekabpour, S.J.; Amini, A.; Dadgar, H.; Nemati, R.; Gholamrezanezhad, A.; Nabipour, I.; Jafari, E.; Ahmadzadehfar, H. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in a Case of Concurrent Neuroendocrine Tumors and Meningioma: Achieving Two Things in a Single Action. Mol. Imaging Radionucl. Ther. 2021, 30, 107–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Barone, F.; Inserra, F.; Scalia, G.; Ippolito, M.; Cosentino, S.; Crea, A.; Sabini, M.G.; Valastro, L.; Patti, I.V.; Mele, S.; et al. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT Follow Up after Single or Hypofractionated Gamma Knife ICON Radiosurgery for Meningioma Patients. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Einhellig, H.C.; Siebert, E.; Bauknecht, H.-C.; Tietze, A.; Graef, J.; Furth, C.; Schulze, D.; Miszczuk, M.; Bohner, G.; Schatka, I.; et al. Comparison of diagnostic value of 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI and standalone MRI for the detection of intracranial meningiomas. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fabritius, M.P.; Geyer, T.; Ahmaddy, F.; Albert, N.L.; Bartenstein, P.; Tiling, R.; Rübenthaler, J.; Holzgreve, A. Breast Cancer Metastasis Mimicking Meningioma in 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2021, 46, 922–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Haslund-Vinding, J.; Skjoth-Rasmussen, J.; Poulsgaard, L.; Fugleholm, K.; Mirian, C.; Maier, A.D.; Santarius, T.; Rom, P.F.; Meling, T.; Bartek, J.J.; et al. Proposal of a new grading system for meningioma resection: The Copenhagen Protocol. Acta Neurochir. 2021, 164, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kowalski, E.S.; Khairnar, R.; Gryaznov, A.A.; Kesari, V.; Koroulakis, A.; Raghavan, P.; Chen, W.; Woodworth, G.; Mishra, M. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT as a tool for radiation planning and evaluating treatment responses in the clinical management of meningiomas. Radiat. Oncol. 2021, 16, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kaya, G.; Soydas Turan, B.; Dagdelen, S.; Berker, M.; Tuncel, M. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Pituitary Carcinoma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2021, 46, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lybik, N.; Wale, D.J.; Wong, K.K.; Liao, E.; Viglianti, B.L. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Imaging of Refractory Pituitary Macroadenoma Invading the Orbit. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2021, 46, 505–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Pelak, M.J.; Flechl, B.; Mumot, M.; Galalae, R.; Tubin, S.; Hug, E.; Lütgendorf-Caucig, C. The Value of SSTR2 Receptor-Targeted PET/CT in Proton Irradiation of Grade I Meningioma. Cancers 2021, 13, 4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ragni, A.; Nervo, A.; Papotti, M.; Prencipe, N.; Retta, F.; Rosso, D.; Cacciani, M.; Zamboni, G.; Zenga, F.; Uccella, S.; et al. Pituitary metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: Case report and narrative review. Pituitary 2021, 24, 828–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vay, S.U.; Werner, J.-M.; Kabbasch, C.; Schmidt, M.; Drzezga, A.; Fink, G.R.; Galldiks, N.; Warnke, C. Uncovering an Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma Using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2021, 49, E464–E465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yarmohammadi, A.; Savino, P.J.; Koo, S.J.; Lee, R.R. Case report 68Ga-DOTATATE of optic nerve sheath meningioma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2021, 22, 101048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Balaban Genc, Z.C.; Filizoglu, N.; Ozguven, S. Recurrent Glomus Jugulare Tumor Invading the Cerebellum on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2022, 47, e406–e407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Farce, J.; Lecouillard, I.; Carsin Nicol, B.; Bretonnier, M.; Girard, A. Intracavernous Schwannoma Characterized With 18F-FDG, 68Ga-DOTATOC, and 18F-Choline PET. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2022, 47, e165–e166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Filizoglu, N.; Ozguven, S. A Rare Case of Pituitary Carcinoma With Bone Metastases. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2022, 47, e298–e299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Fine, G.C.; Zhu, G.G.; Morton, K.A.; Damme, N.; Koppula, B.R. Pineal Gland Metastasis From Gastric Carcinoid—A Rare Manifestation. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2022, 47, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Mairal, E.; Chevalier, E.; Imbert, L.; Boursier-Joppin, C.; Verger, A. Multiparametric 18F-FDG and 68GA-DOTATOC PET Imaging in Bone Metastatic Meningioma Before Radionuclide Therapy. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2022, 47, e321–e322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Saidi, B.; Fallahi, B.; Manafi-Farid, R.; Fard-Esfahani, A.; Eftekhari, M. 68Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in an Intraosseous Hemangioma, as a Potential Cause of False-Positive PET/CT Finding, Simulating Tumoral Involvement. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2022, 47, e274–e275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Henze, M.; Schuhmacher, J.; Hipp, P.; Kowalski, J.; Becker, D.W.; Doll, J.; Mäcke, H.R.; Hofmann, M.; Debus, J.; Haberkorn, U. PET imaging of somatostatin receptors using [68GA]DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide: First results in patients with meningiomas. J. Nucl. Med. 2001, 42, 1053–1056. [Google Scholar]
  80. Filipsson Nyström, H. Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET in the Management of Pituitary Tumours. NCT02419664. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419664?term=NCT02419664&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  81. Ivanidze, J. 68-Ga DOTATATE PET/MRI in the Diagnosis and Management of Somatostatin Receptor Positive Central Nervous System Tumors DOMINO-START; NCT04081701. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04081701?term=NCT04081701&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  82. Johnson, J.M. A Pilot Study of 68Ga-Dotatate PET CT for Radiation Treatment Response Assessment in Meningiomas NCT03953131. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03953131?term=NCT03953131&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  83. Merrell, K.W. A Prospective, Phase II Study of Lutetium Lu 177 Dotatate (LUTATHERA®) in Patients with Inoperable, Progressive Meningioma after External Beam Radiation Therapy. NCT04082520. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04082520?term=NCT04082520&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  84. Verger, A.; Kas, A.; Darcourt, J.; Guedj, E. PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: An Update and Overview of a Rapidly Growing Area. Cancers 2022, 14, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang-Yin, J.T.; Girard, A.; Bertaux, M. What does PET Imaging Bring to Neuro-Oncology in 2022? A Review. Cancers 2022, 14, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tariciotti, L.; Caccavella, V.M.; Fiore, G.; Schisano, L.; Carrabba, G.; Borsa, S.; Giordano, M.; Palmisciano, P.; Remoli, G.; Remore, L.G.; et al. A Deep Learning Model for Preoperative Differentiation of Glioblastoma, Brain Metastasis and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Pilot Study. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 816638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Albert, N.L.; Weller, M.; Suchorska, B.; Galldiks, N.; Soffietti, R.; Kim, M.M.; la Fougère, C.; Pope, W.; Law, I.; Arbizu, J.; et al. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro. Oncol. 2016, 18, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Galldiks, N.; Albert, N.L.; Sommerauer, M.; Grosu, A.L.; Ganswindt, U.; Law, I.; Preusser, M.; Le Rhun, E.; Vogelbaum, M.A.; Zadeh, G.; et al. PET imaging in patients with meningioma—Report of the RANO/PET Group. Neuro. Oncol. 2017, 19, 1576–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Galldiks, N.; Langen, K.-J.; Albert, N.L.; Chamberlain, M.; Soffietti, R.; Kim, M.M.; Law, I.; Le Rhun, E.; Chang, S.; Schwarting, J.; et al. PET imaging in patients with brain metastasis—Report of the RANO/PET group. Neuro. Oncol. 2019, 21, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Galldiks, N.; Niyazi, M.; Grosu, A.L.; Kocher, M.; Langen, K.-J.; Law, I.; Minniti, G.; Kim, M.M.; Tsien, C.; Dhermain, F.; et al. Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients—A report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro. Oncol. 2021, 23, 881–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Meißner, A.-K.; Gutsche, R.; Galldiks, N.; Kocher, M.; Jünger, S.T.; Eich, M.-L.; Montesinos-Rongen, M.; Brunn, A.; Deckert, M.; Wendl, C.; et al. Radiomics for the noninvasive prediction of the BRAF mutation status in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Neuro. Oncol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zaragori, T.; Oster, J.; Roch, V.; Hossu, G.; Chawki, M.B.; Grignon, R.; Pouget, C.; Gauchotte, G.; Rech, F.; Blonski, M.; et al. 18 F-FDOPA PET for the Noninvasive Prediction of Glioma Molecular Parameters: A Radiomics Study. J. Nucl. Med. 2022, 63, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ahmed, N.; Ferini, G.; Hossain, M.A.T.M.; Barua, K.K.; Hossain, M.N.; Umana, G.E.; Shlobin, N.A.; Scalia, G.; Palmisciano, P.; Tomasi, O.S.; et al. Evaluation of Surgical Cleavage Plane by Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Adult Intracranial Meningiomas. Life 2022, 12, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bin Alamer, O.; Palmisciano, P.; Mallela, A.N.; Labib, M.A.; Gardner, P.A.; Couldwell, W.T.; Lunsford, L.D.; Abou-Al-Shaar, H. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of petroclival meningiomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes of primary and adjuvant radiosurgery. J. Neurooncol. 2022, 15, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sheporaitis, L.A.; Osborn, A.G.; Smirniotopoulos, J.G.; Clunie, D.A.; Howieson, J.; D’Agostino, A.N. Intracranial meningioma. AJNR. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1992, 13, 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  96. Brastianos, P.K.; Galanis, E.; Butowski, N.; Chan, J.W.; Dunn, I.F.; Goldbrunner, R.; Herold-Mende, C.; Ippen, F.M.; Mawrin, C.; McDermott, M.W.; et al. Advances in multidisciplinary therapy for meningiomas. Neuro. Oncol. 2019, 21, i18–i31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Inserra, F.; Barone, F.; Palmisciano, P.; Scalia, G.; Da Ros, V.; Abdelsalam, A.; Crea, A.; Sabini, M.G.; Tomasi, S.O.; Ferini, G.; et al. Hypofractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: Institutional Experience on Benign and Malignant Intracranial Tumors. Anticancer Res. 2022, 42, 1851–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Azizkhanian, I.; El Ahmadieh, T.Y.; Palmisciano, P.; Abou-Mrad, Z.; Daoud, E.V.; Essibayi, M.A.; Connors, S.; Aoun, S.G.; Kim, J.; Hatanpaa, K.J.; et al. Distant Pituitary Adenoma Spread: A Systematic Review and Report of 2 Cases. Oper. Neurosurg. 2022, 22, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Palmisciano, P.; Haider, A.S.; Nwagwu, C.D.; Wahood, W.; Aoun, S.G.; Abdullah, K.G.; El Ahmadieh, T.Y. Bevacizumab vs laser interstitial thermal therapy in cerebral radiation necrosis from brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurooncol. 2021, 154, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Galldiks, N.; Lohmann, P.; Albert, N.L.; Tonn, J.C.; Langen, K.-J. Current status of PET imaging in neuro-oncology. Neuro-Oncol. Adv. 2019, 1, vdz010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Holzgreve, A.; Albert, N.L.; Galldiks, N.; Suchorska, B. Use of PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncological Surgery. Cancers 2021, 13, 2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Collins, F.S.; Varmus, H. A New Initiative on Precision Medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 793–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Shooli, H.; Nemati, R.; Ahmadzadehfar, H.; Aboian, M.; Jafari, E.; Jokar, N.; Nabipour, I.; Dadgar, H.; Gholamrezanezhad, A.; Larvie, M.; et al. Theranostics in Brain Tumors. PET Clin. 2021, 16, 397–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram.
Cancers 14 02925 g001
Figure 2. (A) MRI scan showing a left sphenopetrosal lesion suspected to be meningioma; (B) [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scan showing high tracer uptake of the left sphenopetrosal lesion, suggesting the diagnosis of meningioma, normal tracer uptake of the pituitary gland.
Figure 2. (A) MRI scan showing a left sphenopetrosal lesion suspected to be meningioma; (B) [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scan showing high tracer uptake of the left sphenopetrosal lesion, suggesting the diagnosis of meningioma, normal tracer uptake of the pituitary gland.
Cancers 14 02925 g002
Figure 3. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scan showing a left intraventricular lesion with high tracer uptake in a patient with a history of carcinoid. GK treatment was planned by contouring the margins of the lesion with tracer uptake.
Figure 3. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scan showing a left intraventricular lesion with high tracer uptake in a patient with a history of carcinoid. GK treatment was planned by contouring the margins of the lesion with tracer uptake.
Cancers 14 02925 g003
Table 1. Summary of all included studies and pooled patients.
Table 1. Summary of all included studies and pooled patients.
CharacteristicsTotalDiagnostic PurposesTreatment PlanningNeuro-Theranostics
Cohort size, No. (%)
Patients1030644 (62.5%)337 (32.7%)49 (4.8%)
Lesions1277867 (67.9%)356 (27.9%)54 (4.2%)
Pathology, No. lesions (%)
Meningioma1196 (93.6%)806 (93%)355 (99.7%)40 (74.1%)
Pituitary adenoma36 (2.8%)36 (4.2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Brain metastases15 (1.2%)15 (1.7%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
High-grade glioma12 (0.9%)0 (0%)0 (0%)12 (22.2%)
Pituitary carcinoma6 (0.5%)3 (0.3%)1 (0.3%)2 (3.7%)
Granulomatous inflammation2 (0.2%)2 (0.2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Lymphoma2 (0.2%)2 (0.2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Glomus jugulare1 (0.1%)1 (0.1%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Hemangioma1 (0.1%)1 (0.1%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Schwannoma1 (0.1%)1 (0.1%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Tracer, No. patients (%)
DOTATOC548 (53.2%)275 (42.7%)250 (74.2%)23 (46.9%)
DOTATATE403 (39.1%)329 (51.1%)68 (20.2%)6 (12.2%)
DOTANOC59 (5.7%)40 (6.2%)19 (5.6%)0 (0%)
DOTATOC/DOTATATE20 (1.9%)0 (0%)0 (0%)20 (40.8%)
Table 2. Overview of all included studies using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for diagnostic purposes.
Table 2. Overview of all included studies using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for diagnostic purposes.
Authors—YearReason for
[68Ga]Ga-PET
Patients/
Lesions
Pathology/TracerMBq Dose/
SUVmax
Findings
Henze, 2001 [79]Diagnostic
feasibility
3/
8
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
175/
10.6
Higher accuracy in evaluating intraosseous extent at skull base
Afshar-Oromieh,
2012 [30]
Compare the accuracy to MRI134/
190
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
139.6 (55–307)/
4.6
Higher sensitivity for tumors at falx cerebri and skull base
Graf, 2012 [31]Detect infracranial invasion16/
16
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
70–120/
N/A
Higher accuracy in evaluating infracranial invasion
Law, 2013 [34]Systemic tumor staging1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
250/
N/A
Incidental meningioma detection
Yilmaz, 2013 [35]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
N/A/
N/A
High DOTATOC uptake with low FDG uptake
Boss, 2014 [37]Assess the accuracy of hybrid PET/MRI3/
3
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
135 (126–153)/
N/A
Similar accuracy to PET/CT
Slotty, 2014 [38]Differentiate recurrence from scarring1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Higher accuracy in differentiating tumor (uptake) versus scar (no uptake)
Zhao, 2014 [16]Assess pituitary reserve and residual adenoma35/
35
Pituitary adenoma/
DOTATATE
100–200/
Residual 3.6
Reserve 5.8
Higher DOTATOC uptake pituitary reserve and higher FDG uptake residual tumor
Afshar-Oromieh, 2015 [13]Assess the accuracy of hybrid PET/MRI15/
33
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
190 (100–265)/
PET/CT 10.5
PET/MRI 8.3
High sensitivity/specificity (PET) and morphological evaluation (MRI)
Klingenstein,
2015 [40]
Differential
diagnosis optic pathway lesions
13/
13
Meningioma (10), other (3)/DOTATATEN/A/
N/A
Confirm meningioma (high uptake) vs. other diseases (no/low uptake)
Rachinger, 2015 [14]Differentiate tumor from tumor-free tissue21/
21
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
150/
Threshold 2.3
SUVmax 2.3 threshold to differentiate tumor tissue versus non-tumor tissue
Taneja, 2015 [42]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Granulomatous inflammation/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
High uptake in granulomatous inflammation
Xiao, 2015 [43]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
5
Pituitary carcinoma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
High expression SSTR2 in pituitary carcinoma plus FDG-undetected lesions (4)
Basu, 2016 [44]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
2
Pituitary adenoma and meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Synchronous detection meningioma plus pituitary adenoma
Sommerauer,
2016 [45]
Predict tumor growth rate23/
64
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
150/
Intracranial 11.2
Transosseous 43.3
DOTATATE-PET predicts tumor growth in grade-1 and grade-2 meningiomas
Garmes, 2016 [47]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Pituitary carcinoma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Confirmation of pituitary carcinoma with metastases
Kunz, 2017 [15]Detect intraosseous invasion82/
82
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
150/
Extraosseous 7.6
Transosseous 14.2
Higher detection transosseous extent of meningiomas than contrast-enhanced MRI
Unterrainer,
2017 [48]
Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
3
Brain metastasis/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
High tracer uptake in metastases from thyroid carcinoma
Villanueva-Meyer, 2018 [50]Tumor staging1/
5
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
136.9/
N/A
Detection of multiple dural-based plus liver metastases
Dressen, 2019 [52]Assess SSTR2 expression67/
67
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
11.2
High DOTATATE uptake (SSTR2 expression) may coincide with low FDG uptake (low metabolic rate)
Ivanidze, 2019 [53]Diagnostic
confirmation
20/
49
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
23.3
Differentiate residual meningioma versus post-therapy change (target lesion/superior sagittal sinus)
Purandare, 2019 [54]Differential
diagnosis
40/
40
Meningioma (31), dural metastases (4)/DOTATOCN/A/
Meningioma 12.7
Metastases 6.0
Higher accuracy in differentiating meningiomas (high uptake) from dural-based metastasis (low uptake)
Unterrainer,
2019 [55]
Diagnostic
confirmation and differential
1/
2
Meningioma and dural metastasis/
DOTATOC
N/A/
Meningioma 88
Metastases 2.9
Differentiation of concurrent meningioma and dural-based metastasis
Unterrainer,
2019 [56]
Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Detection of multiple meningiomas and liver, lung, and bone metastases
Bashir, 2020 [58]Differential
diagnosis
2/
2
Meningioma (1), lymphoma (1)/
DOTATOC
N/A/
Meningioma 11.5
Lymphoma 11.8
Different lesions showed similar SUVmax
Bashir, 2020 [59]Relation tracer uptake and SSRT2 expression15/
15
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
105/
20.9 (8.4–102)
Tumor-to-background ratio best PET metric for the evaluation of SSTR2 expression
Ueberschaer,
2020 [60]
Assess the extent of resection49/
52
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
150/
4.2 (2.8–13.9)
Postoperative PET has higher accuracy than Simpson grade
Assadi, 2021 [61]Assess radionuclide response1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
N/A/
Pre 11.76
Post 9.02
Reduced SUVmax after radionuclide
Barone, 2021 [62]Assess SUV changes after radiosurgery20/
20
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
N/A/
Pre 20.8 (2.3–52)
Post 12.5 (2.3–44)
Post-radiosurgery reduction of SUVmax in 7/12 patients
Einhelling, 2021 [63]Compare the accuracy to MRI57/
112
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
163.2/
10.8
High sensitivity in detecting small sphenoidal or orbital meningiomas
Fabritius, 2021 [64]Differential
diagnosis
1/
1
Brain metastasis/
DOTATOC
N/A/
N/A
High expression SSTR2 in breast cancer metastasis
Hanslund-Vinding, 2021 [65]Assess residual tumor post-surgery6/
6
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
N/A/
N/A
DOTATATE plus biopsy “area of doubt” to confirm complete tumor resection
Kaya, 2021 [67]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
5
Pituitary carcinoma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Confirmation of spinal cord metastases
Ragni, 2021 [70]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Brain metastasis/
DOTATOC
N/A/
N/A
Incidental finding pituitary mass in NEN follow-up
Vay, 2021 [71]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Confirm optic nerve sheath meningioma
Yarmohammadi, 2021 [72]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
2.4
Confirm optic nerve sheath meningioma
Balabanc Genc, 2022 [73]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Glomus jugulare/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Confirm recurrent glomus jugulare invading the cerebellum
Farce, 2022 [74]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Schwannoma/DOTATOCN/A/
N/A
Low DOTATOC uptake, low FDG uptake, high choline uptake
Filizoglu, 2022 [75]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Pituitary carcinoma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Confirm pituitary carcinoma plus systemic metastases
Fine, 2022 [76]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Brain metastasis/
DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Confirm pineal metastasis in neuroendocrine neoplasm follow-up
Mairal, 2022 [77]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
N/A/
N/A
Mismatch low DOTATOC and high FDG
Saidi, 2022 [78]Diagnostic
confirmation
1/
1
Hemangioma/DOTATATEN/A/
39.8
High DOTATATE uptake post-traumatic hemangioma
Table 3. Overview of all included studies using 68Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for planning radiotherapy and/or surgical resection.
Table 3. Overview of all included studies using 68Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for planning radiotherapy and/or surgical resection.
Authors—YearReason for
[68Ga]Ga-PET
Patients/
Lesions
Pathology/TracerMBq Dose/
SUVmax
Findings
Milker-Zabel,
2006 [26]
Volume contouring for fractionated SRT 26/
27
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
156/
N/A
Change target definition in 19 patients (73%)
Gehler, 2009 [27]Volume contouring for intensity-modulated RT26/
26
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
150/
N/A
Improved target definition for skull base and recurrent tumors
Nyuyki, 2010 [28]Volume contouring for SRT42/
51
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
70–120/
N/A
Improved target definition for osseous infiltrated tumors
Thorwart, 2011 [29]Volume contouring for intensity-modulated RT1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
N/A
N/A
Lower target definition with PET/MRI than PET/CT + MRI
Combs, 2013 [32]Volume contouring for proton/carbon therapy70/
70
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
N/A
N/A
Improved target definition for post-resection lesions
Graf, 2013 [33]Volume contouring for fractionated SRT54/
56
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
70–120/
N/A
Improved target definition for skull base tumors (lower GTV)
d’Amico, 2014 [36]Volume contouring for cyber knife1/
1
Pituitary carcinoma/
DOTATOC
N/A
N/A
Improved target definition for pituitary carcinoma invading the cavernous sinus
Maclean, 2017 [46]Volume contouring for RT10/
10
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
100/
N/A
Improved inter-observer variability in contouring
Stade, 2018 [49]Volume contouring for RT10/
10
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A
N/A
Reduction in treatment volumes and doses to organs at risk
Zollner, 2018 [51]Volume contouring for RT20/
20
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
9.76
Extended safety margins (>1 cm) favor higher local control
Acker, 2019 [17]Volume contouring for cyber knife10/
11
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
165/
N/A
PET/MRI improves target definition in training doctors
Graef, 2021 [18]Volume contouring for cyber knife8/
10
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
168/
5.6
Improved target definition for optic nerve sheath meningiomas
Guinto-Nishimura, 2021 [19]Intraoperative resection guidance1/
1
Meningioma/
DOTATOC
N/A
N/A
Improved target definition for intraosseous meningioma
Kowalski, 2021 [66]Volume contouring for RT19/
19
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
61.2
Improved target definition for intraosseous and falx meningiomas
Mahase, 2021 [20]Volume contouring for hypofractionated RT8/
9
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A
N/A
Reduction in treatment volumes and doses to organs at risk
Pelak, 2021 [69]Volume contouring for proton therapy30/
34
Meningioma/
DOTANOC
DOTATOC
DOTATATE
75-273/
13.5 (6.6–31.2)
Identification of MRI-undetected lesions and improved definition of intraosseous extension
Table 4. Overview of all included studies using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA PET for planning neurotheranostics therapy.
Table 4. Overview of all included studies using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA PET for planning neurotheranostics therapy.
Authors—YearReason for [68Ga]Ga-PETPatients/
Lesions
Pathology/TracerMBq Dose/
SUVmax
Findings
Collamati, 2015 [39]Estimate uptake of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC tracer 23/
23
High-grade glioma (12), meningioma (11)/
DOTATOC
N/A/
N/A
Pilot study using 68Ga-DOTATOC to estimate uptake of 90Y-DOTATOC radiotracer to guide tumor resection
Novruzov, 2015 [41]Assess SSTR2 expression for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATE therapy1/
1
Pituitary carcinoma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
Pre 6.8
Post 4.7
High [68Ga]Ga -DOTATATE uptake (SSTR2 expression) in pituitary carcinoma with use for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATE therapy
Seystahl, 2016 [21]Assess SSTR2 expression for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATE therapy20/
20
Meningioma/
DOTATOC, DOTATATE
N/A/
N/A
Higher SSTR2 expression in a tumor correlated with higher rates of stable disease at 6 months post-therapy
Verburg, 2019 [57]Intraarterial injection versus venous infusion to evaluate tracer uptake for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATE therapy4/
9
Meningioma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
Intraarterial 21.6
Venous 7.1
Selective intraarterial DOTATATE injection increases tracer uptake in meningiomas with insufficient venous uptake confirming eligibility for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATE therapy
Lybik, 2021 [68]Assess SSTR2 expression for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATE therapy1/
1
Pituitary carcinoma/
DOTATATE
N/A/
24
High [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE uptake (SSTR2 expression) in pituitary carcinoma with use for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATE therapy
Table 5. Overview of all ongoing clinical trials on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in neuro-oncology.
Table 5. Overview of all ongoing clinical trials on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in neuro-oncology.
Investigator—Trial NumberEnrollment/
Pathology
Inclusion CriteriaExclusion CriteriaPrimary
Outcomes
Secondary
Outcomes
Filipsson Nyström
NCT02419664 [80]
22/
Pituitary adenomas
(1) Naïve, unoperated pituitary tumor with GH or ACTH or TSH production or non-functioning without treatment with somatostatin analogues or dopamine agonists.(1) Pregnancy or lactating;
(2) Isolated prolactin-producing tumors;
(3) Overproduction of gonadotrophins;
(4) Carcinoids (ectopic CRF production);
(5) Allergy to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC.
SUVmax in pituitary tumors compared to normal pituitary(1) Correlate [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC uptake with expression of SSTR2;
(2) Adverse events;
(3) Detection of post-surgery tumor recurrence.
Ivanidze
NCT04081701 [81]
90/
SSTR-positive brain tumors
(1) Age ≥ 18 years;
(2a) Meningioma diagnosis at pathology and suspected recurrence or residual disease at MRI; OR
(2b) SSTR2-positive brain tumors;
(3) 1.5T or 3T MRI as per clinical standard-of-care and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT with the PET portion fused with MRI.
(1) Contraindications to gadolinium-based contrast agent;
(2) Allergy to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE;
(3) Pregnancy.
Diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI will be compared to MRI alone.Correlate [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI with expression of:
(1) SSTR2;
(2) Ki67;
(3) Progesterone receptor;
(4) EGFR.
Johnson
NCT03953131 [82]
12/
Meningioma
(1) Any meningioma with ≥10 mm measurable residual disease;
(2) Planned radiation therapy;
(3) Willing and able to give consent and participate in all evaluations.
(1) Neurofibromatosis type 1 or 2;
(2) Pregnancy
(3) Contraindication to MRI;
(4) Body weight greater than 400 pounds (lbs.) (181.4 kg).
(1) Diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT;
(2) Metabolic response to radiation measured by reduction in tumor to background ratio (SUVmax of tumor compared to background parenchyma).
N/A
Merrell
NCT04082520 [83]
41/
Meningioma
(1) Prior treatment (surgery and/or radiation);
(2) Radiographic evidence of progression;
(3) Measurable disease;
(4) Prior fractionated or stereotactic radiation at the site of progressive meningioma;
(5) ECOG-PS ≤ 2;
(6) ANC ≥ 1500/mm;
(7) PLT ≥ 100,000/mm;
(8) Hb ≥ 9 g/dL;
(9) Direct bilirubin < 1.5 × ULN;
(10) AST ≤ 3 × ULN;
(11) PT/INR/PTT ≤ 1.5 × ULN;
(12) CCL ≤ 40 mL/mm;
(13) Negative pregnancy test;
(14) AST ≤ 3 × ULN;
(15) Willing and able to give consent and participate in all evaluations.
(1) Eligibility for surgery or radiation with curative intent;
(2) Pregnancy, nursing, or childbearing age;
(3) Ineligible due to co-morbid systemic illnesses or immunocompromised;
(4) Contraindication to MRI;
(5) Other active malignancy ≤ 2 years prior to registration;
(6) Myocardial infarction ≤ 6 months or congestive heart failure;
(7) Spontaneous urinary incontinence;
(8) Significant toxicity related to previous radiation;
(9) Optic nerve sheath meningioma, extracranial meningioma.
Progression-free survival at 6 months after [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI + [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy.(1) Overall survival;
(2) Progression free survival (up to 5 years);
(3) Adverse events.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palmisciano, P.; Watanabe, G.; Conching, A.; Ogasawara, C.; Ferini, G.; Bin-Alamer, O.; Haider, A.S.; Sabini, M.G.; Cuttone, G.; Cosentino, S.; et al. The Role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Radiotracers in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Ongoing Clinical Trials. Cancers 2022, 14, 2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14122925

AMA Style

Palmisciano P, Watanabe G, Conching A, Ogasawara C, Ferini G, Bin-Alamer O, Haider AS, Sabini MG, Cuttone G, Cosentino S, et al. The Role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Radiotracers in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Ongoing Clinical Trials. Cancers. 2022; 14(12):2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14122925

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palmisciano, Paolo, Gina Watanabe, Andie Conching, Christian Ogasawara, Gianluca Ferini, Othman Bin-Alamer, Ali S. Haider, Maria Gabriella Sabini, Giacomo Cuttone, Sebastiano Cosentino, and et al. 2022. "The Role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Radiotracers in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Ongoing Clinical Trials" Cancers 14, no. 12: 2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14122925

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop