Next Article in Journal
Safety and Efficacy of Crizotinib in Combination with Temozolomide and Radiotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Phase Ib GEINO 1402 Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
Secondary Malignancy Risk Following Proton vs. X-ray Radiotherapy of Thymic Epithelial Tumors: A Comparative Modeling Study of Thoracic Organ-Specific Cancer Risk
Previous Article in Journal
Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Young Women with Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Neuroaxis Irradiation in the Treatment of Intraspinal Ewing Sarcoma: A Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Associated with Hemorrhage of Melanoma Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Era of Targeted/Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies

1
Department of Radiotherapy, Sana Hospital Offenbach, 63069 Offenbach am Main, Germany
2
Saphir Radiosurgery Center Frankfurt, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
3
Institute of Biostatistic and Mathematical Modeling, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
4
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
5
Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(10), 2391; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102391
Submission received: 14 April 2022 / Revised: 5 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 12 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Radiation Therapy for Oncology)

Simple Summary

Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have a high propensity for hemorrhage (HA) after treatment. Our retrospective analysis evaluated factors associated with HA of MBM after robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the era of modern systemic therapy, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on this side effect. A total of 55 patients with 279 MBM were treated. The use of anticoagulants was the only predictive factor, both for radiologically evident HA and HA causing grade 3 toxicity. The interval between the administration of systemic therapy and SRS was also significant with regard to HA causing grade 1 toxicity, but it appears that the combination was safe, at least concerning grade 3 toxicity. We believe that our study is a useful contribution to the current literature, as it provides insights regarding the factors that correlate with HA.

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the factors associated with hemorrhage (HA) of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) after Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the modern era of systemic therapy. A total of 55 patients with 279 MBM were treated in 93 fractions. The median age, SRS dose, radiological follow-up, and time to HA were 60.4 years, 20 Gy, 17.7 months, and 10.7 months, respectively. Radiologically evident HA was documented in 47 (16.8%) metastases. Of the 55 patients, 25 (45.4%) suffered an HA. Among those, HA caused grade 3 toxicity in 10 patients (40%) and grade 1 symptoms in 5 patients (20%). Ten patients (40%) with HA experienced no toxicity. Logistic regression revealed the use of anticoagulants and the administration of systemic therapy within 7/15 days from SRS to be predictive for HA. When considering the HA causing grade 3 symptomatology, only the use of anticoagulants was significant, with the delivery of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) before the HA narrowly missing statistical significance. Our retrospective analysis showed that the administration of modern systemic therapy within 7/15 days from SRS may contribute to HA of MBM, though it appears safe, at least concerning grade 3 toxicity. The use of anticoagulants by the time of SRS significantly increased the risk of HA.
Keywords: melanoma; brain metastases; hemorrhage; stereotactic radiosurgery; targeted therapy; immune checkpoint inhibitors melanoma; brain metastases; hemorrhage; stereotactic radiosurgery; targeted therapy; immune checkpoint inhibitors

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zoga, E.; Wolff, R.; Ackermann, H.; Meissner, M.; Rödel, C.; Tselis, N.; Chatzikonstantinou, G. Factors Associated with Hemorrhage of Melanoma Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Era of Targeted/Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies. Cancers 2022, 14, 2391. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102391

AMA Style

Zoga E, Wolff R, Ackermann H, Meissner M, Rödel C, Tselis N, Chatzikonstantinou G. Factors Associated with Hemorrhage of Melanoma Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Era of Targeted/Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies. Cancers. 2022; 14(10):2391. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zoga, Eleni, Robert Wolff, Hanns Ackermann, Markus Meissner, Claus Rödel, Nikolaos Tselis, and Georgios Chatzikonstantinou. 2022. "Factors Associated with Hemorrhage of Melanoma Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Era of Targeted/Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies" Cancers 14, no. 10: 2391. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102391

APA Style

Zoga, E., Wolff, R., Ackermann, H., Meissner, M., Rödel, C., Tselis, N., & Chatzikonstantinou, G. (2022). Factors Associated with Hemorrhage of Melanoma Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Era of Targeted/Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies. Cancers, 14(10), 2391. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop