Next Article in Journal
Effects of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection on the Risk and Prognosis of Primary Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Taiwan
Next Article in Special Issue
Cold Atmospheric Plasma Increases Temozolomide Sensitivity of Three-Dimensional Glioblastoma Spheroids via Oxidative Stress-Mediated DNA Damage
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition of Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer by Targeting IL-13/IL13Rα2 Binding Site with Specific Monoclonal Antibodies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasma-Activated Medium Potentiates the Immunogenicity of Tumor Cell Lysates for Dendritic Cell-Based Cancer Vaccines
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Plasma-Treated Solutions (PTS) in Cancer Therapy

Cancers 2021, 13(7), 1737; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071737
by Hiromasa Tanaka 1,*,†, Sander Bekeschus 2,*,†, Dayun Yan 3,*,†, Masaru Hori 1, Michael Keidar 3 and Mounir Laroussi 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Cancers 2021, 13(7), 1737; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071737
Submission received: 8 January 2021 / Revised: 5 February 2021 / Accepted: 9 February 2021 / Published: 6 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plasma Oncology toward Clinical Translation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled “Plasma-Treated Solutions (PTS) in Cancer Therapy” by Liu et al. discussed the anticancer effect of PTS/PAM/PAS/PAL/PTL/PSS and importance of large volume of sterile PTS. This review addresses the challenges and opportunities of plasma-treated solutions (PTS) for cancer treatment. These results mentioned in this review manuscripts are collectively vital in understanding the plasma liquid-chemistry for use in oncology and will help design more optimal liquids for further exploration in research and future applications. This review manuscript is nice and need minor revision. The issues are listed as below.

  1. Author must describe direct and indirect plasma treatment based on plasma physics view-point also in Section 1 or 2.
  2. Author must improve quality of Table 1 as many words are not readable.
  3. I recommend author to improve Figure 2. Try to include more species and factors generated by plasma on surface, in gas and liquids.
  4. DAF is not only for NO, try to make it NOx or RNS.
  5. Author must describe previous studies and reviews based on plasma-liquid for biological applications, especially for cancer treatment. An example of a reference is given here. (Kaushik N K, Ghimire B, Li Y, Adhikari M, Veerana, M, Kaushik N, Jha N, Adhikari B, Lee SJ, Masur M, Woedtke Tv, Weltmann K D, Choi E H.  2018 Biol. Chem. 400 039062)

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Low-temperature plasma and plasma treated solutions brings represents hope in oncology therapy. This manuscript brings review of plasma-treated solutions from their definition through their affects, efficiancy and mechanisms researched in in vitro and in vivo experiments. The findings are also suitably demostrated by graphs and figures from previous publications, which increases quality of the manuscript. 

I have some comment on the formal page:

  • p4, line 149: there is an extra parenthesis 

I have some questions:

  • You have mentioned immuno-modulatory properties of PTS. Could you specify them in more details? Could be PTS used in combination with immuno therapy? What is the effect of PTS application on T lymphocytes infiltrating tumour?
  • Every tumor is specific and has its own microenvironment, deregulated pathways and mutational load. How these factors could influence sensitivity of cells to ROS and efficiency of PTS? Should the use of PTS be personalized based on molecular characterization of tumor tissue?
  • Different tumor cell lines showed different sensitivity to certain types of PTS. What does the effectiveness of specific types of PTS depend on?

I think it would be appropriate to add these answers to the text.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This impressive study has been very carefully performed by some of the most internationally reputed searchers in the field. The study is comprehensive and focuses on the interest of plasma treated solutions in oncology, compared with direct plasma application.

Important points for future works and a rapid clinical translation are very clearly developed. The need for a standardization of methods is particularly highlighted, encouraging authors of reports to give « the exact chemical composition of the type of media » as well as « the essential types of ROS/RNS generated in the solution by the plasma source », two essential points allowing a better comparison between studies.

This review will be of great value for students, basic scientists as well as physicians, inside and outside the field of plasma medicine. The main short lived reactive species in the plasma phase and long lived reactive species in the solution are reported, together with their possible influence and limitations upon cancer cells and tumors, as observed in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Some intracellular mechanisms involved in cancer cell death or tumor size reduction are also presented.

Finally, if a hormetic cell response to PTS can be assumed (which is, from my opinion, still questionable), studies similar to the one of Xu et al. (ref [34]) presented in paragraph 4.2. have to be performed in order to identify thresholds (RONS concentrations, exposure times, …) inducing PTS toxic effects. Similarly, the selectivity of PTS treatments on cancer cells should also be evoked in Part 3 concerning in vitro experiments.

Nevertheless, I highly recommend a rapid publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop