Next Article in Journal
Liver Transplantation for T2 Hepatocellular Carcinoma during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Novel Model Balancing Individual Benefit against Healthcare Resources
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection on the Risk and Prognosis of Primary Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Taiwan
Previous Article in Journal
Safety and Treatment Outcomes of Nivolumab for the Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Is EBV Associated with Breast Cancer in Specific Geographic Locations?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/cancers13061414
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

EBV and the Pathogenesis of NK/T Cell Lymphoma

by
Ivonne A. Montes-Mojarro
,
Falko Fend
and
Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez
*
Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2021, 13(6), 1414; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061414
Submission received: 17 February 2021 / Revised: 13 March 2021 / Accepted: 17 March 2021 / Published: 19 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) is an aggressive lymphoma associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection that occurs mainly in Asian and Latin American populations. In the last decade, the genetic landscape of ENKTCL has been characterized comprehensively using next-generation sequencing (NGS). This and similar high-throughput approaches revealed that these lymphomas are distinguished by frequent gene mutations leading to activation of the JAK-STAT pathway, and mutations in other genes such as BCOR, DDX3X and TP53. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview about the role of EBV infection and a comparison of the EBV strains and LMP1 variants among different populations. Moreover, a brief summary of the ENKTCL genetic landscape is presented, highlighting the main therapeutically targetable pathways in ENKTCL oncogenesis: the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, the immune response evasion, MYC overexpression, as well as epigenetic alterations.

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous gamma herpes virus with tropism for B cells. EBV is linked to the pathogenesis of B cell, T cell and NK cell lymphoproliferations, with extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL) being the prototype of an EBV-driven lymphoma. ENKTCL is an aggressive neoplasm, particularly widespread in East Asia and the native population of Latin America, which suggests a strong genetic predisposition. The link between ENKTCL and different populations has been partially explored. EBV genome sequencing analysis recognized two types of strains and identified variants of the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), which revealed different oncogenic potential. In general, most ENKTCL patients carry EBV type A with LMP1 wild type, although the LMP1 variant with a 30 base pair deletion is also common, especially in the EBV type B, where it is necessary for oncogenic transformation. Contemporary high-throughput mutational analyses have discovered recurrent gene mutations leading to activation of the JAK-STAT pathway, and mutations in other genes such as BCOR, DDX3X and TP53. The genomic landscape in ENKTCL highlights mechanisms of lymphomagenesis, such as immune response evasion, secondary to alterations in signaling pathways or epigenetics that directly or indirectly interfere with oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. This overview discusses the most important findings of EBV pathogenesis and genetics in ENKTCL.

1. Introduction

Extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL) is considered the prototype of EBV-driven T and NK cell lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD). It has a predilection for extranodal involvement, including the nasopharyngeal region, skin, gastrointestinal tract, testis, and central nervous system (CNS). Morphologically, ENKTCL is characterized by angioinvasion and angiodestruction with prominent coagulative necrosis and karyorrhexis [1]. Its pathogenesis is still unclear, but the characteristic geographical distribution suggests that ethnicity plays an important role [1,2]. ENKTCL predominantly occurs in East Asia and in the indigenous populations of Latin American countries, and it is rare in Europe and North America [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Other diseases with similar geographic distribution and universal association with EBV are aggressive NK cell leukemia (ANKL) and the provisional entity primary EBV-positive nodal T cell or NK cell lymphoma. There are some clinical and morphological overlapping features among these entities, therefore differential diagnosis is not always easy [9,10,11,12,13].
The contribution of EBV to the development of benign and malignant LPD has been extensively investigated since the discovery of the virus over the last 60 years. The importance of EBV in ENKTCL lymphomagenesis was first recognized in 1990, and since then has been confirmed in various studies [14,15]. To investigate the role of EBV in the pathogenesis of this lymphoma, further studies have focused on the viral proteins and their genetic variants [16,17]. Moreover, the strong geographic distribution of ENKTCL affecting specific populations suggests a genetic predisposition for ENKTCL. So far, common genetic variants at HLA-DPB1 in patients from Asia (Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea) are associated with an increased risk of ENKTCL [18], whereas the haplotype HLA-A*0201 in the Japanese population seems to confer protection, probably by an effective cellular immune response against the virus [19]. There has also been a great interest in the mutational landscape of ENKTCL. Until now, most studies come from Asian countries, where important variations in the distribution of gene mutations were observed, raising the possibility that the genetic background or the geographic distribution might be responsible for these differences [20,21,22,23,24]. This review summarizes the morphological, epidemiological, biological, and genetic alterations implicated in ENKTCL, highlighting the role of EBV in its pathogenesis. In addition, a comparison of the biological features of ENKTCL between Asian and Latin American populations is described.

2. Morphological and Immunophenotypical Features of ENKTCL

ENKTCL typically appears as ulceration in the mucosa of the upper aero-digestive tract (nasal cavity, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses, and palate). This ulceration is triggered by a neoplastic lymphoid infiltration associated with variable degrees of inflammation; some cases are advanced, showing large amounts of coagulative necrosis and destruction of the adjacent epithelial structures [1,25,26]. The cytology of the malignant T and NK cells displays a wide-spectrum, from small bland-looking cells to large and pleomorphic cells with irregular folded nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli [1]. The presence of “dirty” coagulative necrosis, due to karyorrhexis, associated with inflammation and angiocentricity/angiodestruction is a hallmark of this lymphoma and a hint for EBV infection that should be confirmed using in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) [1]. The neoplastic cells are CD56+, surface CD3− but cytoplasmic CD3+, and express cytotoxic molecules such as TIA-1, granzyme B and perforin, demonstrating an NK cell phenotype. In addition, the cells are positive for CD2, NKG2D and NKG2A; however, CD57 and CD16 remain mostly negative [27,28]. Other T cell markers such as CD4, CD5 and CD8 are negative whereas CD7 is variable expressed [29,30]. A small proportion of cases (15–20%) demonstrate a bona-fide T cell cytotoxic phenotype characterized by CD8+, cytotoxic granules+, CD3+, CD5+, CD56−/+ and TCRγδ+ or TCRαβ+ [29,30]. In addition, molecules with immune response function are present in the neoplastic cells such as CD25, HLA-DR, FAS (CD95) and FASL (CD95L) [31]. CD30 and the megakaryocyte associated tyrosine kinase (MATK) are variably expressed and might be misleading, raising the diagnosis of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) or monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T cell lymphoma (MEITL) and enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma (EITL) [32,33]. Other key markers recognized as potential targets for therapy are survivin, as well as the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) and the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), the last two involved in immune evasion mechanisms [34,35].

3. ENKTCL Geographic Distribution

The geographic distribution of ENKTCL is characteristic with higher incidence among Native Americans, Hispanic and Asian ethnic groups [36]. In Europe and North America ENKTCL accounts for less than 1% of all Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHL), whereas in Asian countries and Latin American countries it is more frequent representing 2 to 15% of NHL [3,4,5,6]. A recent study from the T cell lymphoma project, an international cooperative study, demonstrated NK cell malignant lymphoproliferations accounted for 2 to 5.1% of all T and NK cell lymphomas in North America, 1 to 4.3% in Europeans, and higher rates in Asian populations of 22.4 to 22.5% [37]. Aozasa et al. estimated that the frequency of ENKTCL is 10-fold higher in Asian populations when compared to Europeans [38]. In East Asia, ENKTCL is more common in Thailand (34%), followed by China (21%), Japan (12%), and South Korea (9%) [39]. Moreover, ENKTCL is strongly associated with the genetic background of the affected population, being more frequent in Chinese descendants than those with Malay and Indian descent [40,41]. In Latin America, the incidence of ENKTCL is higher in countries with a high proportion of native indigenous population such as Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador; it is less common in other countries with a greater percentage of European descendants such as Argentina and Uruguay [8]. Fourteen different series of ENKTCL are available from Latin American, accounting 449 cases: four studies with cases from Peru (131 cases, 29.2%) [7,42,43,44], four studies from Brazil (114 cases, 25.4%) [7,45,46,47], two studies from Guatemala (125 cases, 27.8%) [7,48], two from Chile (31 cases, 6.9%) [47,49], and two from Mexico (48 cases, 10.7%) [6,50].
An ENKTCL case series from Guatemala described the association of this lymphoma with ethnicity and reported that 90% of the patients in the study were of Mayan origin and low socioeconomic status [51]. In the United States, ENKTCL represents approximately 1–2% of all T and NK cell lymphomas and less than 0.2% of all NHL, with a higher frequency among Hispanic and American Asians [52].
A bias in these studies is that Hispanic population comprises all Latin-American immigrants, mainly Mexicans, which do not necessarily belong to the native indigenous population, where the incidence of this neoplasia seems to be higher [51,52]. The peculiar worldwide distribution of this lymphoma seems to be related with the genetic background of the population (Figure 1), and not to endemic areas of EBV or EBV subtypes [53]. Nevertheless, evidence for the suspected genetic predisposition such as the HLA-DBP1 haplotype remain elusive [18]. Homozygous deletion of RASGRPI, leading to defective activation of the MAPK pathway and impaired immune response to EBV, is also documented as an inherited susceptibility to EBV infection and EBV-driven LPD such as ENKTCL [54]. In addition, homozygous germline mutation in FAM160A1 leading to alterations in the microenvironment is related to ENKTCL familiar susceptibility [55].

4. Epstein-Barr Virus Lymphomagenesis in ENKTCL

Although the universal association of EBV and ENKTCL is well recognized, the exact role of EBV in ENKTCL remains elusive [2]. EBV is an oncogenic double-stranded DNA herpesvirus encoding around 80–85 genes, infecting more than 90% of the population worldwide [57]. In developing countries, EBV infection is more common during the first years of life and is asymptomatic, whereas in developed countries, it is delayed until adolescence, presenting as a self-limited B cell lymphoproliferative disease named by Sprunt and Evans in 1920 as infectious mononucleosis (IM) [58,59,60]. IM is an acute disease occurring in about 50% of adolescents with the characteristic symptoms of fever, fatigue, sore throat, and lymphadenopathy [61,62]. During primary infection, EBV triggers an EBV-specific cytotoxic cell and IgM response to EBV antigens such as EBV capsid antigen (VCA) and EBV early antigen (EA) [63]. This response leads to a self-limited infection; nevertheless, EBV remains in a lifelong carrier state mainly in memory B cells, allowing the DNA virus to integrate into the host cells and reside there life-long. During this chronic infection, various external or immune factors may incite the infected cells to enter the viral lytic cycle, triggering their activation and the virus transmission to T cells or NK cells and stimulating the development of different lymphoproliferative disorders [64,65,66,67]. EBV is detected in a small proportion of NK and T cells in patients with IM. During primary infection, NK cells are infected using a virus–cell interaction distinct from the CD21-mediated pathway known in B cells. One of the mechanisms proposed is related to the use of the glycoprotein gp350, as well as the CD21 cellular protein gaining in order to infect the NK and/or mature T cells via “trogocytosis”, a phenomenon described in the interaction of mature T cells with malignant cells, where membrane patches can be exchanged [68,69]. Another mechanism of T and NK cell infection can occur when NK or T cells are attempting to kill an EBV infected target cell [69]. The expression of HLA class II by NK cells has also been proposed to interact with viral glycoproteins gp42 and gp85 known to play an important role in EBV internalization into HLA class II positive cells [70].
EBV expresses various “latent genes”, comprising six Epstein-Barr nuclear antigens (EBNA1, EBNA2, EBNA3A, EBNA3B, EBNA3C and leader protein), three latent membrane proteins (LMP1, 2A, 2B), two EBV-encoded noncoding RNAs (EBER 1 and 2), and many miRNAs from two regions of the EBV genome: BART and BHRF, so-called BHRF1- and BART-miR [71]. According to the pattern of the latent gene expression, three different latency programs have been characterized in B cells from EBV healthy carriers [72,73,74]. EBV characteristically spreads through saliva, infecting and replicating in epithelial cells of the tonsils (lytic cycle), states in which the viral transcription factors BZLF1, BRLF1, BALF5 and BCRF1 are expressed, resulting in the shedding of infectious virus into the oral cavity [75,76]. Infected naïve B cells migrate to the lymph node follicle to initiate the immune response activating the latency III program, which involves the unrestricted expression of all nine latent genes. In order to escape immune surveillance, and for the infected B cells to be able to enter and survive the germinal center, there is a reduction in the latent gene transcription machinery–latency II—with the expression of many proteins (LMP1+, LMP2+; EBNA1+, EBERs+, BARTs+), except for EBNA2. Latency I is restricted to the expression of EBNA1 and is responsible for the maintenance and replication of the episomal EBV genome [72,73,74]. The so-called latency 0 is present in resting memory B cells that carry the viral genome, but viral antigen expression is maximally suppressed and only EBERs are demonstrated [73,77,78]. These latent EBV expression programs in B cells are reflected in EBV-associated malignancies. Latency type I is usually present in Burkitt Lymphoma; latency IIa, also referred to as latency II, is seen in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) and ENKTCL [72,74,79]; latency IIb represents a transition state between latency II and latency III, which is detected in vitro in cells from B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) infected with EBV, characterized by EBNAs expression but LMP1 absence [72], and latency III is typically observed in severely immunodeficient individuals [80]. During latency II, the infected cells can acquire somatic mutations and create the best scenario to promote the development of EBV-associated lymphomas such CHL and Burkitt lymphoma [72,78].

4.1. Epstein-Barr Virus Strains and Variations

The close association of EBV with oncogenesis in ENKTCL has been established by demonstrating the presence of EBV in clonal and episomal forms in tumor cells (viral genome arranged by nucleosomes and packaged into a chromosome structure), as well as various EBV-encoded proteins. Infection by EBV induces the expression of several “latent genes”, which may lead to malignant transformation of lymphoblastoid cells, including EBNA1, EBNA2, EBNA3A, EBNA3B, EBNA3C and 3 LMP1, 2A, 2B [71]. According to the genetic polymorphisms contained in the EBNA proteins (EBNA2 and EBNA-3A, -3B and -3C), two different strains of EBV are recognized worldwide (Table 1): type A (e.g., B95-8, GD1, and Akata) and type B (e.g., AG876 and P3HR), also known as type 1 and type 2, respectively [16,17].
Sequencing studies have shown a 54% identity in amino acid sequence and 79% at gene level between EBV strains type A and B. In addition, a single amino acid change (S442D) in EBV type A seems to enhance the oncogenic ability of LMP1 [17], highlighting that EBV strain type A has a higher oncogenic potential in comparison to type B EBV, which shows lower transformation capacity in lymphoblastoid cells [87]. EBV type B is widely distributed, regardless of the immunological status of the host [88,89,90,91,92]; however, in the setting of non-immunocompromised patients, EBV type B seems to enhance its oncogenic potential only when associated to the 30 bp LMP1 deletion (see below) [43,87,93]. Intriguingly, these strains demonstrate a characteristic geographical distribution that might influence the ENKTCL prevalence among regions. Although type A EBV strain is more widespread in Europe, Asia, and North and Latin America, type B EBV is recurrently seen in Alaska, Papua New Guinea, and Central Africa [17].
Interestingly, studies in Mexican population have revealed the presence of EBV type B with the 30 bp LMP1 deletion in about 9% of ENKTCL, 38% in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 50% of CHL, and 53% in healthy carriers in reactive lymph nodes [82,94,95]. This suggests that EBV type B with the 30 bp LMP1 deletion is endemic in the Mexican population. However, larger ENKTCL series from Mexico and Latin America demonstrated EBV strain type A as the most prevalent strain in this lymphoma [6,82]. In addition to the classification of the EBV strain, other variants according to changes within the genetic sequence of LMP1, EBNA1 and BamHI are also reported [96,97,98,99,100,101].

4.2. LMP1 Variants

The latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) is a viral protein that is able to induce a malignant transformation not only in B cells but also in epithelial cells [97,102,103]. LMP1 favors oncogenesis by the induction of cell surface adhesion molecules (CD23, CD40 ICAM1, LAF1 and LFA3), activation of antigens, and the upregulation of antiapoptotic molecules such as BCL2, MCL1, BFL1, A20 [75,103]. Moreover, LMP1 mimics CD40, acting as a constitutively active member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily and activates downstream signaling pathways, including NF-κB and MAPK pathways [104,105,106]. LMP1 is codified by BNLF1, a gene located within the BamHI-N region of the virus genome [107]. The product of this gene is an integral protein which contains 386 amino acids comprising a short cytoplasmic amino terminus, six transmembrane alpha-helical loops of hydrophobic nature, and a long cytoplasmic domain at the carboxyl terminus [104,108]. Variations in the C-terminus of the LMP1 protein seem to be crucial for its function, and for the classification of LMP1 variants, including: the presence of a 30 bp deletion, 33 bp repeats, an insertion of 15 bp within one of the repeats, and other amino acid substitutions [98,109,110,111]. Among the different LMP1 variants, the 30 bp deletion is the most frequent worldwide [112]. The 30 bp deletion arises at the 3′ end of the C-terminal tail and in relation to the functional domain CTAR2, resulting in increased oncogenesis and a decrease in the immune response [113,114]. LMP1 deletion is present in healthy populations, as well as associated to infectious mononucleosis, chronic tonsillar hyperplasia, and various malignant neoplasias such as gastric carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Burkitt lymphoma, DLBCL, and CHL peripheral T cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS) and ENKTCL (Table 2) [86,95,112,115,116,117].
Next-generation sequencing technology has also led to greater insights into EBV classification and the increased recognition of new strains and sequence variations [17,90]. EBV sequencing profiling revealed frequent intragenic deletions affecting BART micro-RNA clusters present in 10 of 23 ENKTCL cases studied. These deletions seem to be related to the lytic cycle activation through the upregulation of BZLF1 and BRLF1 [118].
The latest genomic and transcriptomic studies in ENKTCL demonstrated focal EBV genome deletions and integration of EBV fragments to the host genome. In addition, gene expression profiling described a higher number of T cell epitope abnormalities but lower activation of latent and lytic viral genes, in comparison to other EBV-associated cancers [119]. Likewise, by phylogenetic analysis, EBV sequences of ENKCTL cases clustered together in two independent Chinese studies, revealing similarities between EBV sequences in ENKTCL and those of Asia, and differed significantly from other EBV-associated diseases. These results suggest that the geographic prevalence of ENKTCL in Asian populations is related to the particular sequence of the EBV strain [81,119]. These broad genetic analyses have revealed a better understanding of EBV pathogenesis in ENKTCL and are providing new hypotheses about EBV mechanisms of oncogenesis. However, the majority of cases are from Asian origins, and larger series are required to corroborate these findings among other populations [119].
Table
Table 2. Geographical distribution of LMP1 variants in T cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Table 2. Geographical distribution of LMP1 variants in T cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
CountryEntitynLMP1 VariantReference
30 bp delWT
MexicoENKTCL42 cases10 (23.8%)32 (76.2%)[82]
PeruENKTCL27 cases012 (100%)[78]
ArgentinaENKTCL12 cases5 (41.7%)7 (58.3%)[82]
ChinaENKTCL13 cases10 (76.9%)3 (23.1%)[120]
ChinaENKTCL23 cases21 (91.3%)2 (8.7%)[84]
MexicoENKTCL23 cases6 (26%)17 (73.9%)[6]
MalaysiaPTCL9 cases9 (100%)0[86]
DenmarkPTCL18 cases11 (61.1%)7 (38.9%)[86]
ENKTCL: extranodal natural killer T cell lymphoma; 30 bp del: 30 base pair deletion variant; WT: wild type; PTCL: peripheral T cell lymphoma. In addition to the LMP1 del variant, the loss of the restriction site Xho I in LMP1 has been shown in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Asian pop-ulation [97,121,122,123].

5. ENKTCL Genetic Features

Although EBV plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of ENKTCL, other factors might be equally important. During the last decade, several sequencing studies based on various platforms (whole genome sequencing, whole exome sequencing and targeted sequencing) have been published, analyzing different populations. This has led to a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of this entity, the discovery of new targeted therapies, and more recently, to the proposal of a classification according to the molecular changes associated with clinical prognosis. In Table 3, the main genetic features reported in ENKTCL so far are summarized [81,124,125].
The most common recurrent cytogenetic alteration in ENKTCL is the loss of 6q21 in about 20 to 43% of cases, resulting in the loss of genes related to tumor suppression such as POPDC3, PREP, PRDM1, ATG5, AIM1 and HACE1 [126,127,128]. Other recurrent chromosomal alterations are losses in chromosomes 1p4, 5p13, 12q3, 14q21, 15q24, 17p4 and 19q13 and gains in 2q5, 3q26, 7q34, 8q24, 13q4 and 10q3. Intriguingly, 8q24.3 gain is related to poor clinical outcome [129,130].
Further analyses have shown important differences between ENKTCL and ANKL, such as the gain of 2q and the losses in chromosomes 6q16-q27, 11q22-q23, 5p14-p14, 5q34-q35, 1p36-p36, 2p16, 4q12, and 4q31-q32 characteristic in ENKTCL [131,132]. Studies have demonstrated that primary EBV-positive nodal T/NK cell lymphoma, a provisional entity in the WHO classification, is a distinct entity characterized by the loss of 14q11, where the TCR alfa locus is located and is indirect evidence of TCR rearrangement; therefore, it is a lymphoma of T cell origin. These lymphomas present in older patients and lack nasal or extranodal involvement [133].
The mutational landscape of ENKTCL was first described in different cohorts from China, Korea and Japan, showing the same mutational profile but with different frequencies. The most recurrently mutated genes include members of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathway, mainly STAT3 (JAK3, STAT5B), followed by epigenetic modifiers (KMT2D, ARID1A, EP300), tumor suppressor genes (TP53, BCOR, MGA) and the RNA helicase gene DDX3X [20,21,22,23,24,135]. Targeted sequencing in ENKTCL from Latin America including cases from Mexico, Peru and Argentina showed, not surprisingly, comparable results to Asian populations (Figure 2) [82]. STAT3 was the most frequently mutated gene similar to the Korean cohorts. [20,125,135]. In previous studies, recurrent mutations in TP53 were reported with relatively high frequencies in ENKTCL from Latin America [50] and in Asian populations [156,157], (24 to 62%, respectively); however, new sequencing data demonstrated a lower prevalence of TP53 mutations in the Chinese [21] and in the Latin American studies [82]. DDX3X, another tumor suppressor, is also frequently mutated in the Chinese population and strongly associated with poor outcome [21], not confirmed in other studies [20,21,22,23,24]. The different frequencies reported in the different populations might be the result of the various analytic methods used (whole-exome sequencing, targeted sequencing, RNA-sequencing) in the different studies more than representing real differences in the genetic background or geographic distribution.
Epigenetic alterations such as methylation in cell cycle regulators, histone modifications, and de-regulated miRNAs are also described. Aberrant promoter methylation is a common oncogenic mechanism in ENKTCL, which induces the silencing of various tumor suppressor genes such as BCL2L11 (BIM), DAPK1, PTPN6 (SHP1), TET2, SOCS6, and ASNS [141], as well as in regulators of the cell cycle such as CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and CDKN1A [140]. EZH2 is a histone methyltransferase, a member of the polycomb repressor complex 2 (PCR2) which controls the DNA methylation of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes acting as a transcriptional repressor. In ENKTCL, EZH2 not only acts as a repressor, but also acts as an oncogene, promoting proliferation, invasion and survival through the NF-kB signaling pathway [142,143,144]. Further key epigenetic regulators are miRNA, small non-coding RNAs capable of inducing post-transcriptional gene regulation acting as oncogenes or as tumor suppressor genes [158,159,160]. Numerous deregulated miRNA have been identified in ENKTCL, including the downregulated miR-146a, miR-26a, miR-26b, miR-28-5, miR-101 and miR-363 [144,145], whereas miR21 and miR155 are upregulated probably acting as oncogenes, stimulating proliferation through the AKT and MAPK signaling pathways [137,146]. On the other hand, overexpression of the tumor suppressor miR-146a in vitro leads to downregulation of the NF-kB signaling pathway by the inhibition of its target TRAF6, resulting in repressed cell proliferation, induced apoptosis, and enhanced chemosensitivity [145]. The profiling and biogenesis of miRNAs has been studied in various disorders and not only in ENKTCL, because they can be exploited and used as biomarkers, but also as new therapeutic target by inhibiting miRNA oncogenes or by the miRNA replacement of tumor suppressor miRNAs [161]. In the last decade, miRNA therapies for cancer, metabolic and infectious diseases have reached the preclinical phase of commercial development, representing a new therapy approach in these disorders [161,162,163].
Gene expression profiling has also enabled the distinguishing of upregulated genes, with an important role in the pathogenesis of ENKTCL including BIRC5 encoding for survivin, MYC, PD-L1, RUNX3, AURKA, and PDGFRA. MYC is a well-known oncogene related to aggressive clinical behavior in mature B cell lymphomas [164], and is associated with NOTCH1 mutations in T cell lymphomas [165]. Overexpression of MYC in ENKTCL seems to be related to alterations in the MAPK signaling pathway and the EBV pathogenesis because MYC is a transcriptional target of EBNA1 and LMP1 viral proteins [144]. Interestingly, MGA mutations and 1p22.1 loss of heterozygosity are similarly related to MYC expression promoting the disturbance of the MAPK signaling pathway [81].

6. ENKTCL Proposed Molecular Classification

Based on molecular integrated analysis of ENKTCL, a new molecular classification has been proposed, distinguishing three different ENKCTL subtypes defined according to their genetic characteristics [81]. The first group—TSIM subtype (alteration in Tumor Suppressors and Immune Modulators)—consists of cases with JAK-STAT signaling pathway activation, TP53 mutations, del6q21, and mechanisms associated with the immune response such as antigen presentation, NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, immune surveillance, PD-L1 overexpression, and genomic instability. This group predominates and presents higher NK cell gene expression than the other groups (Figure 3). The second group—MB subtype (MGA mutations and LOH at the BRDT locus)—is characterized by MGA mutations, a tumor suppressor gene, related to MYC overexpression and associated with MAPK, NOTCH3/4 and WNT signaling pathway activation (Figure 4). BRDT enhances oncogenic functions of cancer drivers, including MYC. These findings provided evidence that MYC is critically involved in this subtype. The third group—HEA subtype (mutations in HDAC1, EP300 and ARID1A)—is linked to epigenetic changes, mainly aberrant histone acetylation leading to activation of the NF-kB and TCR signaling pathways (CD3D/G, CD8A/B, CD28, ICOS, and VAV2/3) (Figure 5). These cases show higher T cell gene expression compared to the other groups. These data suggested that the molecular subtypes correlate well with cells of origin (NK vs T cell). Furthermore, it also showed correlation with the predicted three-year overall survival (79%, 39% and 92%, respectively). The worse prognosis observed in the MB subtype confirmed previous observations that MYC overexpression correlates with disease progression and dismal prognosis in ENKTCL [166]. Interestingly, EBV gene transcript levels were differentially expressed in these three molecular subtypes. The TSMI subtype was associated with the expression of EBV lytic genes such as BALF3, which increases genomic instability, regulates TP53 targeted genes, and leads to malignant transformation. The MB subtype showed low expression of EBV genes, particularly LMP1, suggesting that this group could have BL-like EBV infection (latency type I). The HEA subtype was characterized by increased lytic gene BNFR1, a partner of the histone chaperon complex, which interacts with DAXX to promote viral latency and cellular immortalization.

7. Conclusions

The contemporary understanding of ENKTCL pathogenesis has been enhanced. The use of high-throughput technologies has allowed the genetic analysis of large series of ENKTCL in different populations around the world. These studies have been conducted to investigate the pathogenesis of ENKTCL and the role of EBV in its oncogenesis. EBV strain distribution in ENKTCL shows EBV type A in Asian and Latin American population, whereas type B is identified in Latin American only in Peru and Mexico in comparison to other Western countries. Interestingly, LMP1 30 bp del variant, which promotes EBV oncogenic mechanisms, has been frequently demonstrated in the Chinese population and less commonly in Latin American countries, where its detection is mostly restricted to patients carrying EBV strain type B.
As has been proposed in diffuse large B cell lymphoma, the integration of genomic structural alterations in ENKTCL has identified three molecular subgroups related to the cell of origin (NK vs T cell), pathogenic alterations, EBV sequences and clinical outcome. The model suggests that EBV infection is the earliest event, leading to the susceptibility of NK and T cells to genomic alterations that together will result in the pathogenesis of ENKTCL. Consequently, these alterations will influence the prognosis and therapy response. The understanding of the genetic alterations and their altered mechanisms should guide novel therapeutic interventions such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, MYC inhibitors, and histone deacetylase inhibitors. Nevertheless, these studies have only been conducted in Chinese populations, and new comprehensive genomics studies are needed to confirm these results.

Author Contributions

I.A.M.-M. wrote the manuscript and created the figures and tables. L.Q.-M. designed the review and critically reviewed and helped in writing the manuscript. F.F. critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lina Maria Serna-Higuita for helping to build the map of ENKTCL geographical distribution (University of Tuebingen, Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometrics).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chan, J.K.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L.; Ferry, J.A. Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type. In WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4th ed.; Swerdlow, S.H., Ed.; IARC: Lyon, France, 2017; pp. 368–371. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kanavaros, P.; Briere, J.; Emile, J.F.; Gaulard, P. Epstein-Barr virus in T and natural killer (NK) cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Leukemia 1996, 10 (Suppl. 2), s84–s87. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jaffe, E.S.; Harris, N.L.; Stein, H.; Isaacson, P.G. Classification of lymphoid neoplasms: The microscope as a tool for disease discovery. Blood 2008, 112, 4384–4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Jaffe, E.S.; Krenacs, L.; Raffeld, M. Classification of cytotoxic T-cell and natural killer cell lymphomas. Semin. Hematol. 2003, 40, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, J.; Kim, W.S.; Park, Y.H.; Park, S.H.; Park, K.W.; Kang, J.H.; Lee, S.S.; Lee, S.I.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, K.; et al. Nasal-type NK/T cell lymphoma: Clinical features and treatment outcome. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 1226–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Elenitoba-Johnson, K.S.; Zarate-Osorno, A.; Meneses, A.; Krenacs, L.; Kingma, D.W.; Raffeld, M.; Jaffe, E.S. Cytotoxic granular protein expression, Epstein-Barr virus strain type, and latent membrane protein-1 oncogene deletions in nasal T-lymphocyte/natural killer cell lymphomas from Mexico. Mod. Pathol. 1998, 11, 754–761. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Laurini, J.A.; Perry, A.M.; Boilesen, E.; Diebold, J.; Maclennan, K.A.; Muller-Hermelink, H.K.; Nathwani, B.N.; Armitage, J.O.; Weisenburger, D.D. Classification of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Central and South America: A review of 1028 cases. Blood 2012, 120, 4795–4801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Aviles, A. Nasal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma. A Comparative Analysis of a Mexican Population with the Other Populations of Latin-America. Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 7, e2015052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Porcu, P.; Caligiuri, M. A sheep in wolf’s clothing. Blood 2011, 117, 1438–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lamy, T.; Moignet, A.; Loughran, T.P., Jr. LGL leukemia: From pathogenesis to treatment. Blood 2017, 129, 1082–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Montes-Mojarro, I.A.; Kim, W.Y.; Fend, F.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L. Epstein—Barr virus positive T and NK-cell lymphoproliferations: Morphological features and differential diagnosis. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2020, 37, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chan, J.K.C.; Jaffe, E.S.; Ko, Y.-H. Aggressive NK-cell Leukaemia. In WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4th ed.; Swerdlow, S.H., Ed.; IARC: Lyon, France, 2017; pp. 353–354. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeon, Y.K.; Kim, J.H.; Sung, J.Y.; Han, J.H.; Ko, Y.H. Epstein-Barr virus-positive nodal T/NK-cell lymphoma: An analysis of 15 cases with distinct clinicopathological features. Hum. Pathol. 2015, 46, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aozasa, K.; Takakuwa, T.; Hongyo, T.; Yang, W.I. Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma: Epidemiology and pathogenesis. Int. J. Hematol. 2008, 87, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Harabuchi, Y.; Yamanaka, N.; Kataura, A.; Imai, S.; Kinoshita, T.; Mizuno, F.; Osato, T. Epstein-Barr virus in nasal T-cell lymphomas in patients with lethal midline granuloma. Lancet 1990, 335, 128–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dambaugh, T.; Hennessy, K.; Chamnankit, L.; Kieff, E. U2 region of Epstein-Barr virus DNA may encode Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 7632–7636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kanda, T.; Yajima, M.; Ikuta, K. Epstein-Barr virus strain variation and cancer. Cancer Sci. 2019, 110, 1132–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, G.-W.; Xu, C.; Chen, K.; Huang, H.-Q.; Chen, J.; Song, B.; Chan, J.K.C.; Li, W.; Liu, W.; Shih, L.-Y.; et al. Genetic risk of extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma: A genome-wide association study in multiple populations. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kanno, H.; Kojya, S.; Li, T.; Ohsawa, M.; Nakatsuka, S.; Miyaguchi, M.; Harabuchi, Y.; Aozasa, K. Low frequency of HLA-A*0201 allele in patients with Epstein-Barr virus-positive nasal lymphomas with polymorphic reticulosis morphology. Int. J. Cancer 2000, 87, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, S.; Park, H.Y.; Kang, S.Y.; Kim, S.J.; Hwang, J.; Lee, S.; Kwak, S.H.; Park, K.S.; Yoo, H.Y.; Kim, W.S.; et al. Genetic alterations of JAK/STAT cascade and histone modification in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma nasal type. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 17764–17776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Kucuk, C.; Jiang, B.; Hu, X.; Zhang, W.; Chan, J.K.; Xiao, W.; Lack, N.; Alkan, C.; Williams, J.C.; Avery, K.N.; et al. Activating mutations of STAT5B and STAT3 in lymphomas derived from gammadelta-T or NK cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Jiang, L.; Gu, Z.H.; Yan, Z.X.; Zhao, X.; Xie, Y.Y.; Zhang, Z.G.; Pan, C.M.; Hu, Y.; Cai, C.P.; Dong, Y.; et al. Exome sequencing identifies somatic mutations of DDX3X in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1061–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dobashi, A.; Tsuyama, N.; Asaka, R.; Togashi, Y.; Ueda, K.; Sakata, S.; Baba, S.; Sakamoto, K.; Hatake, K.; Takeuchi, K. Frequent BCOR aberrations in extranodal NK/T-Cell lymphoma, nasal type. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2016, 55, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wen, H.; Ma, H.; Cai, Q.; Lin, S.; Lei, X.; He, B.; Wu, S.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Liu, W.; et al. Recurrent ECSIT mutation encoding V140A triggers hyperinflammation and promotes hemophagocytic syndrome in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chan, J.K. Natural killer cell neoplasms. Anat. Pathol. 1998, 3, 77–145. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Hasserjian, R.P.; Harris, N.L. NK-cell lymphomas and leukemias: A spectrum of tumors with variable manifestations and immunophenotype. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007, 127, 860–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haedicke, W.; Ho, F.C.; Chott, A.; Moretta, L.; Rudiger, T.; Ott, G.; Muller-Hermelink, H.K. Expression of CD94/NKG2A and killer immunoglobulin-like receptors in NK cells and a subset of extranodal cytotoxic T-cell lymphomas. Blood 2000, 95, 3628–3630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, C.W.; Chen, Y.H.; Chuang, Y.C.; Liu, T.Y.; Hsu, S.M. CD94 transcripts imply a better prognosis in nasal-type extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2003, 102, 2623–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jhuang, J.Y.; Chang, S.T.; Weng, S.F.; Pan, S.T.; Chu, P.Y.; Hsieh, P.P.; Wei, C.H.; Chou, S.C.; Koo, C.L.; Chen, C.J.; et al. Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type in Taiwan: A relatively higher frequency of T-cell lineage and poor survival for extranasal tumors. Hum. Pathol. 2015, 46, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, W.Y.; Nam, S.J.; Kim, S.; Kim, T.M.; Heo, D.S.; Kim, C.W.; Jeon, Y.K. Prognostic implications of CD30 expression in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma according to treatment modalities. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2015, 56, 1778–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ng, C.S.; Lo, S.T.; Chan, J.K. Peripheral T and putative natural killer cell lymphomas commonly coexpress CD95 and CD95 ligand. Hum. Pathol. 1999, 30, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.; Tan, S.-Y.; Petersson, B.F.; Khor, Y.M.; Gopalakrishnan, S.K.; Tan, D. Occult recurrence of monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma and the role of MATK gene expression in diagnosis. Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 35, 852–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Roberti, A.; Dobay, M.P.; Bisig, B.; Vallois, D.; Boéchat, C.; Lanitis, E.; Bouchindhomme, B.; Parrens, M.-C.; Bossard, C.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L.; et al. Type II enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma features a unique genomic profile with highly recurrent SETD2 alterations. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zeng, L.; Huang, W.; Cao, Z.; Zheng, B.; Liu, X.; Guo, L.; Feng, X. The correlation of clinicopathological features and prognosis in extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma: A report of 42 cases in the early stage. Ann. Hematol. 2019, 98, 1467–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, L.; Wei, Y.; Yan, X.; Li, N.; Song, H.; Yang, L.; Wu, Y.; Xi, Y.-F.; Weng, H.-W.; Li, J.-H.; et al. Survivin is a prognostic marker and therapeutic target for extranodal, nasal-type natural killer/T cell lymphoma. Ann. Transl. Med. 2019, 7, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fiore, D.; Cappelli, L.V.; Broccoli, A.; Zinzani, P.L.; Chan, W.C.; Inghirami, G. Peripheral T cell lymphomas: From the bench to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 323–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bellei, M.; Sabattini, E.; Pesce, E.A.; Ko, Y.H.; Kim, W.S.; Cabrera, M.E.; Martinez, V.; Dlouhy, I.; Paes, R.P.; Barrese, T.; et al. Pitfalls and major issues in the histologic diagnosis of peripheral T-cell lymphomas: Results of the central review of 573 cases from the T-Cell Project, an international, cooperative study. Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 35, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aozasa, K.; Zaki, M.A. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma: A mini-review. Sci. World J. 2011, 11, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Au, W.Y.; Weisenburger, D.D.; Intragumtornchai, T.; Nakamura, S.; Kim, W.S.; Sng, I.; Vose, J.; Armitage, J.O.; Liang, R.; International Peripheral, T.C.L.P. Clinical differences between nasal and extranasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: A study of 136 cases from the International Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Project. Blood 2009, 113, 3931–3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Peh, S.C. Host ethnicity influences non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma subtype frequency and Epstein-Barr virus association rate: The experience of a multi-ethnic patient population in Malaysia. Histopathology 2001, 38, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tai, Y.C.; Kim, L.H.; Peh, S.C. High frequency of EBV association and 30-bp deletion in the LMP-1 gene in CD56 lymphomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Pathol. Int. 2004, 54, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Barrionuevo, C.; Zaharia, M.; Martinez, M.T.; Taxa, L.; Misad, O.; Moscol, A.; Sarria, G.; Guerrero, I.; Casanova, L.; Flores, C.; et al. Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type: Study of Clinicopathologic and Prognosis Factors in a Series of 78 Cases From Peru. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2007, 15, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Quintanilla-Martinez, L.; Franklin, J.L.; Guerrero, I.; Krenacs, L.; Naresh, K.N.; Rama-Rao, C.; Bhatia, K.; Raffeld, M.; Magrath, I.T. Histological and immunophenotypic profile of nasal NK/T cell lymphomas from Peru: High prevalence of p53 overexpression. Hum. Pathol. 1999, 30, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Arber, D.A.; Weiss, L.M.; Albujar, P.F.; Chen, Y.Y.; Jaffe, E.S. Nasal lymphomas in Peru. High incidence of T-cell immunophenotype and Epstein-Barr virus infection. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1993, 17, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barros, M.H.; Vera-Lozada, G.; Soares, F.A.; Niedobitek, G.; Hassan, R. Tumor microenvironment composition in pediatric classical Hodgkin lymphoma is modulated by age and Epstein-Barr virus infection. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 131, 1142–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Altemani, A.; Barbosa, A.C.; Kulka, M.; Takahashi, T.; Endo, L.; Vassallo, J.; Lorand-Metze, I. Characteristics of nasal T/NK-cell lymphoma among Brazilians. Neoplasma 2002, 49, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Bellei, M.; Chiattone, C.S.; Luminari, S.; Pesce, E.A.; Cabrera, M.E.; de Souza, C.A.; Gabús, R.; Zoppegno, L.; Zoppegno, L.; Milone, J.; et al. T-cell lymphomas in South america and europe. Rev. Bras. Hematol. E Hemoter. 2012, 34, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Schwartz, E.J.; Molina-Kirsch, H.; Zhao, S.; Marinelli, R.J.; Warnke, R.A.; Natkunam, Y. Immunohistochemical Characterization of Nasal-Type Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma Using a Tissue Microarray: An Analysis of 84 Cases. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2008, 130, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cabrera, M.E.; Eizuru, Y.; Itoh, T.; Koriyama, C.; Tashiro, Y.; Ding, S.; Rey, S.; Akiba, S.; Corvalan, A. Nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma and its association with type “i”/XhoI loss strain Epstein-Barr virus in Chile. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007, 60, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Quintanilla-Martinez, L.; Kremer, M.; Keller, G.; Nathrath, M.; Gamboa-Dominguez, A.; Meneses, A.; Luna-Contreras, L.; Cabras, A.; Hoefler, H.; Mohar, A.; et al. p53 Mutations in nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma from Mexico: Association with large cell morphology and advanced disease. Am. J. Pathol. 2001, 159, 2095–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sanchez-Romero, C.; Paes de Almeida, O.; Rendon Henao, J.; Carlos, R. Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type in Guatemala: An 86-Case Series Emphasizing Clinical Presentation and Microscopic Characteristics. Head Neck. Pathol. 2019, 13, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Haverkos, B.M.; Pan, Z.; Gru, A.A.; Freud, A.G.; Rabinovitch, R.; Xu-Welliver, M.; Otto, B.; Barrionuevo, C.; Baiocchi, R.A.; Rochford, R.; et al. Extranodal NK/T Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type (ENKTL-NT): An Update on Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, and Natural History in North American and European Cases. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2016, 11, 514–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Harabuchi, Y.; Takahara, M.; Kishibe, K.; Nagato, T.; Kumai, T. Extranodal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type: Basic Science and Clinical Progress. Front. Pediatr. 2019, 7, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Winter, S.; Martin, E.; Boutboul, D.; Lenoir, C.; Boudjemaa, S.; Petit, A.; Picard, C.; Fischer, A.; Leverger, G.; Latour, S. Loss of RASGRP1 in humans impairs T-cell expansion leading to Epstein-Barr virus susceptibility. EMBO Mol. Med. 2018, 10, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chan, J.Y.; Ng, A.Y.J.; Cheng, C.L.; Nairismagi, M.L.; Venkatesh, B.; Cheah, D.M.Z.; Li, S.T.; Chan, S.H.; Ngeow, J.; Laurensia, Y.; et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies recessive germline mutations in FAM160A1 in familial NK/T cell lymphoma. Blood Cancer J. 2018, 8, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. South, A. rworldmap: A New R package for Mapping Global Data. R J. 2011, 3, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Tzellos, S.; Farrell, P.J. Epstein-barr virus sequence variation-biology and disease. Pathogens 2012, 1, 156–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Haahr, S.; Plesner, A.M.; Vestergaard, B.F.; Höllsberg, P. A role of late Epstein-Barr virus infection in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2004, 109, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Henle, G.; Henle, W.; Clifford, P.; Diehl, V.; Kafuko, G.W.; Kirya, B.G.; Klein, G.; Morrow, R.H.; Munube, G.M.; Pike, P.; et al. Antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in Burkitt’s lymphoma and control groups. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1969, 43, 1147–1157. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Kassel, S.H.; Echevarria, R.A.; Guzzo, F.P. Midline malignant reticulosis (so-called lethal midline granuloma). Cancer 1969, 23, 920–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cohen, J.I. Epstein-Barr virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Taylor, G.S.; Long, H.M.; Brooks, J.M.; Rickinson, A.B.; Hislop, A.D. The immunology of Epstein-Barr virus-induced disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 33, 787–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Luzuriaga, K.; Sullivan, J.L. Infectious Mononucleosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 1993–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Cai, Q.; Chen, K.; Young, K.H. Epstein-Barr virus-positive T/NK-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Exp. Mol. Med. 2015, 47, e133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Anagnostopoulos, I.; Hummel, M.; Kreschel, C.; Stein, H. Morphology, immunophenotype, and distribution of latently and/or productively Epstein-Barr virus-infected cells in acute infectious mononucleosis: Implications for the interindividual infection route of Epstein-Barr virus. Blood 1995, 85, 744–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Hudnall, S.D.; Ge, Y.; Wei, L.; Yang, N.P.; Wang, H.Q.; Chen, T. Distribution and phenotype of Epstein-Barr virus-infected cells in human pharyngeal tonsils. Mod. Pathol. 2005, 18, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Hatton, O.L.; Harris-Arnold, A.; Schaffert, S.; Krams, S.M.; Martinez, O.M. The interplay between Epstein-Barr virus and B lymphocytes: Implications for infection, immunity, and disease. Immunol. Res. 2014, 58, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Smith, N.A.; Coleman, C.B.; Gewurz, B.E.; Rochford, R. CD21 (Complement Receptor 2) Is the Receptor for Epstein-Barr Virus Entry into T Cells. J. Virol. 2020, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tabiasco, J.; Vercellone, A.; Meggetto, F.; Hudrisier, D.; Brousset, P.; Fournié, J.J. Acquisition of viral receptor by NK cells through immunological synapse. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 5993–5998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Isobe, Y.; Sugimoto, K.; Yang, L.; Tamayose, K.; Egashira, M.; Kaneko, T.; Takada, K.; Oshimi, K. Epstein-Barr virus infection of human natural killer cell lines and peripheral blood natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 2167–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kang, M.-S.; Kieff, E. Epstein-Barr virus latent genes. Exp. Mol. Med. 2015, 47, e131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Price, A.M.; Luftig, M.A. To be or not IIb: A multi-step process for Epstein-Barr virus latency establishment and consequences for B cell tumorigenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Babcock, G.J.; Hochberg, D.; Thorley-Lawson, A.D. The expression pattern of Epstein-Barr virus latent genes in vivo is dependent upon the differentiation stage of the infected B cell. Immunity 2000, 13, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Klein, E.; Kis, L.L.; Klein, G. Epstein-Barr virus infection in humans: From harmless to life endangering virus-lymphocyte interactions. Oncogene 2007, 26, 1297–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Smatti, M.K.; Al-Sadeq, D.W.; Ali, N.H.; Pintus, G.; Abou-Saleh, H.; Nasrallah, G.K. Epstein-Barr Virus Epidemiology, Serology, and Genetic Variability of LMP-1 Oncogene Among Healthy Population: An Update. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Young, L.S.; Arrand, J.R.; Murray, P.G. EBV Gene Expression and Regulation. In Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis; Arvin, A., Campadelli-Fiume, G., Mocarski, E., Moore, P.S., Roizman, B., Whitley, R., Yamanishi, K., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  77. Nemerow, G.R.; Mold, C.; Schwend, V.K.; Tollefson, V.; Cooper, N.R. Identification of gp350 as the viral glycoprotein mediating attachment of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) to the EBV/C3d receptor of B cells: Sequence homology of gp350 and C3 complement fragment C3d. J. Virol. 1987, 61, 1416–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Thorley-Lawson, D.A. EBV Persistence--Introducing the Virus. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 390, 151–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Young, L.S.; Yap, L.F.; Murray, P.G. Epstein-Barr virus: More than 50 years old and still providing surprises. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 789–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Young, L.; Alfieri, C.; Hennessy, K.; Evans, H.; O’Hara, C.; Anderson, K.C.; Ritz, J.; Shapiro, R.S.; Rickinson, A.; Kieff, E.; et al. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus transformation-associated genes in tissues of patients with EBV lymphoproliferative disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989, 321, 1080–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xiong, J.; Cui, B.W.; Wang, N.; Dai, Y.T.; Zhang, H.; Wang, C.F.; Zhong, H.J.; Cheng, S.; Ou-Yang, B.S.; Hu, Y.; et al. Genomic and Transcriptomic Characterization of Natural Killer T Cell Lymphoma. Cancer Cell 2020, 37, 403–419.e406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Montes-Mojarro, I.A.; Chen, B.J.; Ramirez-Ibarguen, A.F.; Quezada-Fiallos, C.M.; Perez-Baez, W.B.; Duenas, D.; Casavilca-Zambrano, S.; Ortiz-Mayor, M.; Rojas-Bilbao, E.; Garcia-Rivello, H.; et al. Mutational profile and EBV strains of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type in Latin America. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kim, I.; Park, E.-R.; Park, S.-H.; Lin, Z.; Kim, Y.-S. Characteristics of Epstein-Barr virus isolated from the malignant lymphomas in Korea. J. Med. Virol. 2002, 67, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chiang, A.K.; Wong, K.Y.; Liang, A.C.; Srivastava, G. Comparative analysis of Epstein-Barr virus gene polymorphisms in nasal T/NK-cell lymphomas and normal nasal tissues: Implications on virus strain selection in malignancy. Int. J. Cancer 1999, 80, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wu, S.-J.; Lay, J.-D.; Chen, C.-L.; Chen, J.-Y.; Liu, M.-Y.; Su, I.-J. Genomic analysis of Epstein-Barr virus in nasal and peripheral T-cell lymphoma: A comparison with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in an endemic area. J. Med. Virol. 1996, 50, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sandvej, K.; Peh, S.; Andresen, B.; Pallesen, G. Identification of potential hot spots in the carboxy-terminal part of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) BNLF-1 gene in both malignant and benign EBV-associated diseases: High frequency of a 30-bp deletion in Malaysian and Danish peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Blood 1994, 84, 4053–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Rickinson, A.B.; Young, L.S.; Rowe, M. Influence of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen EBNA 2 on the growth phenotype of virus-transformed B cells. J. Virol. 1987, 61, 1310–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Fassone, L.; Cingolani, A.; Martini, M.; Migliaretti, G.; Oreste, P.L.; Capello, D.; Gloghini, A.; Vivenza, D.; Dolcetti, R.; Carbone, A.; et al. Characterization of Epstein-Barr virus genotype in AIDS-related non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2002, 18, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Panea, R.I.; Love, C.L.; Shingleton, J.R.; Reddy, A.; Bailey, J.A.; Moormann, A.M.; Otieno, J.A.; Ong’echa, J.M.; Oduor, C.I.; Schroeder, K.M.S.; et al. The whole-genome landscape of Burkitt lymphoma subtypes. Blood 2019, 134, 1598–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Correia, S.; Bridges, R.; Wegner, F.; Venturini, C.; Palser, A.; Middeldorp, J.M.; Cohen, J.I.; Lorenzetti, M.A.; Bassano, I.; White, R.E.; et al. Sequence Variation of Epstein-Barr Virus: Viral Types, Geography, Codon Usage, and Diseases. J. Virol. 2018, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Kaymaz, Y.; Oduor, C.I.; Aydemir, O.; Luftig, M.A.; Otieno, J.A.; Ong’echa, J.M.; Bailey, J.A.; Moormann, A.M. Epstein-Barr Virus Genomes Reveal Population Structure and Type 1 Association with Endemic Burkitt Lymphoma. J. Virol. 2020, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chang, C.M.; Yu, K.J.; Mbulaiteye, S.M.; Hildesheim, A.; Bhatia, K. The extent of genetic diversity of Epstein-Barr virus and its geographic and disease patterns: A need for reappraisal. Virus Res. 2009, 143, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Kingma, D.W.; Weiss, W.B.; Jaffe, E.S.; Kumar, S.; Frekko, K.; Raffeld, M. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 oncogene deletions: Correlations with malignancy in Epstein-Barr virus--associated lymphoproliferative disorders and malignant lymphomas. Blood 1996, 88, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Hofscheier, A.; Ponciano, A.; Bonzheim, I.; Adam, P.; Lome-Maldonado, C.; Vela, T.; Cortes, E.; Ortiz-Hidalgo, C.; Fend, F.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L. Geographic variation in the prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly: A comparative analysis of a Mexican and a German population. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24, 1046–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Dirnhofer, S.; Angeles-Angeles, A.; Ortiz-Hidalgo, C.; Reyes, E.; Gredler, E.; Krugmann, J.; Fend, F.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L. High prevalence of a 30-base pair deletion in the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 1 gene and of strain type B EBV in Mexican classical Hodgkin’s disease and reactive lymphoid tissue. Hum. Pathol. 1999, 30, 781–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hu, L.F.; Zabarovsky, E.R.; Chen, F.; Cao, S.L.; Ernberg, I.; Klein, G.; Winberg, G. Isolation and sequencing of the Epstein-Barr virus BNLF-1 gene (LMP1) from a Chinese nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J. Gen. Virol. 1991, 72 Pt 10, 2399–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. See, H.S.; Yap, Y.Y.; Yip, W.K.; Seow, H.F. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) 30-bp deletion and Xho I-loss is associated with type III nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Malaysia. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2008, 6, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Ai, J.; Xie, Z.; Liu, C.; Huang, Z.; Xu, J. Analysis of EBNA-1 and LMP-1 variants in diseases associated with EBV infection in Chinese children. Virol. J. 2012, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Do, N.V.; Ingemar, E.; Phi, P.T.; Jenny, A.; Chinh, T.T.; Zeng, Y.; Hu, L. A major EBNA1 variant from Asian EBV isolates shows enhanced transcriptional activity compared to prototype B95.8. Virus Res. 2008, 132, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Lung, M.L.; Lam, W.P.; Sham, J.; Choy, D.; Yong-Sheng, Z.; Guo, H.Y.; Ng, M.H. Detection and prevalence of the “f” variant of Epstein-Barr virus in southern China. Virology 1991, 185, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Abdirad, A.; Ghaderi-Sohi, S.; Shuyama, K.; Koriyama, C.; Nadimi-Barforoosh, H.; Emami, S.; Mosavi-Jarrahi, A.; Nahvijou, A.; Akiba, S. Epstein-Barr virus associated gastric carcinoma: A report from Iran in the last four decades. Diagn. Pathol. 2007, 2, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Kaye, K.M.; Izumi, K.M.; Kieff, E. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 is essential for B-lymphocyte growth transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 9150–9154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Young, L.S.; Rickinson, A.B. Epstein-Barr virus: 40 years on. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gires, O.; Zimber-Strobl, U.; Gonnella, R.; Ueffing, M.; Marschall, G.; Zeidler, R.; Pich, D.; Hammerschmidt, W. Latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus mimics a constitutively active receptor molecule. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 6131–6140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Martin, J.; Sugden, B. The latent membrane protein oncoprotein resembles growth factor receptors in the properties of its turnover. Cell Growth Differ 1991, 2, 653–660. [Google Scholar]
  106. Eliopoulos, A.G.; Young, L.S. LMP1 structure and signal transduction. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2001, 11, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Fennewald, S.; van Santen, V.; Kieff, E. Nucleotide sequence of an mRNA transcribed in latent growth-transforming virus infection indicates that it may encode a membrane protein. J. Virol. 1984, 51, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Coffin, W.F., 3rd; Erickson, K.D.; Hoedt-Miller, M.; Martin, J.M. The cytoplasmic amino-terminus of the Latent Membrane Protein-1 of Epstein-Barr Virus: Relationship between transmembrane orientation and effector functions of the carboxy-terminus and transmembrane domain. Oncogene 2001, 20, 5313–5330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Zhang, X.S.; Song, K.H.; Mai, H.Q.; Jia, W.H.; Feng, B.J.; Xia, J.C.; Zhang, R.H.; Huang, L.X.; Yu, X.J.; Feng, Q.S.; et al. The 30-bp deletion variant: A polymorphism of latent membrane protein 1 prevalent in endemic and non-endemic areas of nasopharyngeal carcinomas in China. Cancer Lett. 2002, 176, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hadhri-Guiga, B.; Khabir, A.-M.; Mokdad-Gargouri, R.; Ghorbel, A.-M.; Drira, M.; Daoud, J.; Frikha, M.; Jlidi, R.; Gargouri, A. Various 30 and 69 bp deletion variants of the Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 may arise by homologous recombination in nasopharyngeal carcinoma of Tunisian patients. Virus Res. 2006, 115, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Edwards, R.H.; Seillier-Moiseiwitsch, F.; Raab-Traub, N. Signature amino acid changes in latent membrane protein 1 distinguish Epstein-Barr virus strains. Virology 1999, 261, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Neves, M.; Marinho-Dias, J.; Ribeiro, J.; Sousa, H. Epstein-Barr virus strains and variations: Geographic or disease-specific variants? J. Med. Virol. 2017, 89, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, S.N.; Chang, Y.S.; Liu, S.T. Effect of a 10-amino acid deletion on the oncogenic activity of latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus. Oncogene 1996, 12, 2129–2135. [Google Scholar]
  114. Knecht, H.; Bachmann, E.; Brousset, P.; Sandvej, K.; Nadal, D.; Bachmann, F.; Odermatt, B.F.; Delsol, G.; Pallesen, G. Deletions within the LMP1 oncogene of Epstein-Barr virus are clustered in Hodgkin’s disease and identical to those observed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Blood 1993, 82, 2937–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Itakura, O.; Yamada, S.; Narita, M.; Kikuta, H. High prevalence of a 30-base pair deletion and single-base mutations within the carboxy terminal end of the LMP-1 oncogene of Epstein-Barr virus in the Japanese population. Oncogene 1996, 13, 1549–1553. [Google Scholar]
  116. Mori, S.; Itoh, T.; Tokunaga, M.; Eizuru, Y. Deletions and single-base mutations within the carboxy-terminal region of the latent membrane protein 1 oncogene in Epstein-Barr virus-related gastric cancers of southern Japan. J. Med. Virol. 1999, 57, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. da Costa, V.G.; Marques-Silva, A.C.; Moreli, M.L. The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1) 30-bp deletion and XhoI-polymorphism in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Okuno, Y.; Murata, T.; Sato, Y.; Muramatsu, H.; Ito, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Okuno, T.; Murakami, N.; Yoshida, K.; Sawada, A.; et al. Defective Epstein-Barr virus in chronic active infection and haematological malignancy. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 404–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Peng, R.J.; Han, B.W.; Cai, Q.Q.; Zuo, X.Y.; Xia, T.; Chen, J.R.; Feng, L.N.; Lim, J.Q.; Chen, S.W.; Zeng, M.S.; et al. Genomic and transcriptomic landscapes of Epstein-Barr virus in extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma. Leukemia 2019, 33, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Huang, Y.-H.; Wu, Q.-L.; Zong, Y.-S.; Feng, Y.-F.; Hou, J.-H. Nasopharyngeal Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type: Retrospective Study of 18 Consecutive Cases in Guangzhou, China. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2011, 19, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Han, A.J.; Zong, Y.S.; Zhang, M.; Cao, S.M.; Lin, S.X.; Liang, Y.J. Analysis of Epstein-Barr virus with BamHI “f” variant and XhoI-loss of LMP1 gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2003, 32, 534–538. [Google Scholar]
  122. Khanim, F.; Yao, Q.Y.; Niedobitek, G.; Sihota, S.; Rickinson, A.B.; Young, L. Analysis of Epstein-Barr Virus gene polymorphisms in normal donors and in virus-associated tumors from different geographic locations. Blood 1996, 88, 3491–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Feederle, R.; Klinke, O.; Kutikhin, A.; Poirey, R.; Tsai, M.H.; Delecluse, H.J. Epstein-Barr Virus: From the Detection of Sequence Polymorphisms to the Recognition of Viral Types. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 390, 119–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Xiong, J.; Zhao, W.-L. Advances in multiple omics of natural-killer/T cell lymphoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. de Mel, S.; Hue, S.S.-S.; Jeyasekharan, A.D.; Chng, W.-J.; Ng, S.-B. Molecular pathogenic pathways in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Karube, K.; Nakagawa, M.; Tsuzuki, S.; Takeuchi, I.; Honma, K.; Nakashima, Y.; Shimizu, N.; Ko, Y.H.; Morishima, Y.; Ohshima, K.; et al. Identification of FOXO3 and PRDM1 as tumor-suppressor gene candidates in NK-cell neoplasms by genomic and functional analyses. Blood 2011, 118, 3195–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Iqbal, J.; Kucuk, C.; deLeeuw, R.J.; Srivastava, G.; Tam, W.; Geng, H.; Klinkebiel, D.; Christman, J.K.; Patel, K.; Cao, K.; et al. Genomic analyses reveal global functional alterations that promote tumor growth and novel tumor suppressor genes in natural killer-cell malignancies. Leukemia 2009, 23, 1139–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Huang, Y.; de Reynies, A.; de Leval, L.; Ghazi, B.; Martin-Garcia, N.; Travert, M.; Bosq, J.; Briere, J.; Petit, B.; Thomas, E.; et al. Gene expression profiling identifies emerging oncogenic pathways operating in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Blood 2010, 115, 1226–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ko, Y.H.; Choi, K.E.; Han, J.H.; Kim, J.M.; Ree, H.J. Comparative genomic hybridization study of nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma. Cytometry 2001, 46, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Sun, L.; Li, M.; Huang, X.; Xu, J.; Gao, Z.; Liu, C. High-resolution genome-wide analysis identified recurrent genetic alterations in NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, which are associated with disease progression. Med. Oncol. 2014, 31, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Nakashima, Y.; Tagawa, H.; Suzuki, R.; Karnan, S.; Karube, K.; Ohshima, K.; Muta, K.; Nawata, H.; Morishima, Y.; Nakamura, S.; et al. Genome-wide array-based comparative genomic hybridization of natural killer cell lymphoma/leukemia: Different genomic alteration patterns of aggressive NK-cell leukemia and extranodal Nk/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2005, 44, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yang, C.F.; Hsu, C.Y.; Ho, D.M. Aggressive natural killer (NK)-cell leukaemia and extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma are two distinct diseases that differ in their clinical presentation and cytogenetic findings. Histopathology 2018, 72, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ng, S.B.; Chung, T.H.; Kato, S.; Nakamura, S.; Takahashi, E.; Ko, Y.H.; Khoury, J.D.; Yin, C.C.; Soong, R.; Jeyasekharan, A.D.; et al. Epstein-Barr virus-associated primary nodal T/NK-cell lymphoma shows a distinct molecular signature and copy number changes. Haematologica 2018, 103, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Huang, Y.; de Leval, L.; Gaulard, P. Molecular underpinning of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2013, 26, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Song, T.L.; Nairismagi, M.L.; Laurensia, Y.; Lim, J.Q.; Tan, J.; Li, Z.M.; Pang, W.L.; Kizhakeyil, A.; Wijaya, G.C.; Huang, D.C.; et al. Oncogenic activation of the STAT3 pathway drives PD-L1 expression in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2018, 132, 1146–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Sim, S.H.; Kim, S.; Kim, T.M.; Jeon, Y.K.; Nam, S.J.; Ahn, Y.O.; Keam, B.; Park, H.H.; Kim, D.W.; Kim, C.W.; et al. Novel JAK3-Activating Mutations in Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 980–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xue, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Song, Y.; Mei, M.; Lu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Recurrent GNAQ mutation encoding T96S in natural killer/T cell lymphoma. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Shen, L.; Liang, A.C.; Lu, L.; Au, W.Y.; Kwong, Y.L.; Liang, R.H.; Srivastava, G. Frequent deletion of Fas gene sequences encoding death and transmembrane domains in nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 161, 2123–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Takakuwa, T.; Dong, Z.; Nakatsuka, S.; Kojya, S.; Harabuchi, Y.; Yang, W.I.; Nagata, S.; Aozasa, K. Frequent mutations of Fas gene in nasal NK/T cell lymphoma. Oncogene 2002, 21, 4702–4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Kawamata, N.; Inagaki, N.; Mizumura, S.; Sugimoto, K.J.; Sakajiri, S.; Ohyanagi-Hara, M.; Oshimi, K. Methylation status analysis of cell cycle regulatory genes (p16INK4A, p15INK4B, p21Waf1/Cip1, p27Kip1 and p73) in natural killer cell disorders. Eur. J. Haematol. 2005, 74, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Küçük, C.; Hu, X.; Jiang, B.; Klinkebiel, D.; Geng, H.; Gong, Q.; Bouska, A.; Iqbal, J.; Gaulard, P.; McKeithan, T.W.; et al. Global Promoter Methylation Analysis Reveals Novel Candidate Tumor Suppressor Genes in Natural Killer Cell Lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Loong, K.T. EZH2 Mediates Resistance to Apoptosis in Nktl By Activating Nfkb Signaling Through Repression Of TNFAIP3/A20 By H3K27 Trimethylation. Blood 2013, 122, 1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Yan, J.; Ng, S.B.; Tay, J.L.; Lin, B.; Koh, T.L.; Tan, J.; Selvarajan, V.; Liu, S.C.; Bi, C.; Wang, S.; et al. EZH2 overexpression in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma confers growth advantage independently of histone methyltransferase activity. Blood 2013, 121, 4512–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Ng, S.B.; Selvarajan, V.; Huang, G.; Zhou, J.; Feldman, A.L.; Law, M.; Kwong, Y.L.; Shimizu, N.; Kagami, Y.; Aozasa, K.; et al. Activated oncogenic pathways and therapeutic targets in extranodal nasal-type NK/T cell lymphoma revealed by gene expression profiling. J. Pathol. 2011, 223, 496–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Paik, J.H.; Jang, J.Y.; Jeon, Y.K.; Kim, W.Y.; Kim, T.M.; Heo, D.S.; Kim, C.W. MicroRNA-146a downregulates NFkappaB activity via targeting TRAF6 and functions as a tumor suppressor having strong prognostic implications in NK/T cell lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 4761–4771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Yamanaka, Y.; Tagawa, H.; Takahashi, N.; Watanabe, A.; Guo, Y.M.; Iwamoto, K.; Yamashita, J.; Saitoh, H.; Kameoka, Y.; Shimizu, N.; et al. Aberrant overexpression of microRNAs activate AKT signaling via down-regulation of tumor suppressors in natural killer-cell lymphoma/leukemia. Blood 2009, 114, 3265–3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Sun, L.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, H.; Ma, C.; Wei, L. LMP-1 induces survivin expression to inhibit cell apoptosis through the NF-κB and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways in nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 2253–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Selvarajan, V.; Osato, M.; Nah, G.S.S.; Yan, J.; Chung, T.H.; Voon, D.C.; Ito, Y.; Ham, M.F.; Salto-Tellez, M.; Shimizu, N.; et al. RUNX3 is oncogenic in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma and is transcriptionally regulated by MYC. Leukemia 2017, 31, 2219–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Dirmeier, U.; Hoffmann, R.; Kilger, E.; Schultheiss, U.; Briseño, C.; Gires, O.; Kieser, A.; Eick, D.; Sugden, B.; Hammerschmidt, W. Latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus coordinately regulates proliferation with control of apoptosis. Oncogene 2005, 24, 1711–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Nagato, T.; Ohkuri, T.; Ohara, K.; Hirata, Y.; Kishibe, K.; Komabayashi, Y.; Ueda, S.; Takahara, M.; Kumai, T.; Ishibashi, K.; et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 and its soluble form are highly expressed in nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: A potential rationale for immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2017, 66, 877–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Bi, X.-W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, W.-W.; Wang, J.-H.; Liu, W.-J.; Xia, Z.-J.; Huang, H.-Q.; Jiang, W.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Wang, L. PD-L1 is upregulated by EBV-driven LMP1 through NF-κB pathway and correlates with poor prognosis in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2016, 9, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Jo, J.-C.; Kim, M.; Choi, Y.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, J.E.; Chae, S.W.; Kim, H.; Cha, H.J. Expression of programmed cell death 1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Ann. Hematol. 2017, 96, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Iqbal, J.; Weisenburger, D.D.; Chowdhury, A.; Tsai, M.Y.; Srivastava, G.; Greiner, T.C.; Kucuk, C.; Deffenbacher, K.; Vose, J.; Smith, L.; et al. Natural killer cell lymphoma shares strikingly similar molecular features with a group of non-hepatosplenic gammadelta T-cell lymphoma and is highly sensitive to a novel aurora kinase A inhibitor in vitro. Leukemia 2011, 25, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Chen, Y.P.; Chang, K.C.; Su, W.C.; Chen, T.Y. The expression and prognostic significance of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha in mature T- and natural killer-cell lymphomas. Ann. Hematol. 2008, 87, 985–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Li, P.-f.; Lu, Y.; Xia, Z.-j.; Huang, H.-q.; Zhang, Y.-j. CD38 expression predicts poor prognosis and might be a potential therapy target in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type. Ann. Hematol. 2015, 94, 1381–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Hoshida, Y.; Hongyo, T.; Jia, X.; He, Y.; Hasui, K.; Dong, Z.; Luo, W.J.; Ham, M.F.; Nomura, T.; Aozasa, K. Analysis of p53, K-ras, c-kit, and beta-catenin gene mutations in sinonasal NK/T cell lymphoma in northeast district of China. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Takahara, M.; Kishibe, K.; Bandoh, N.; Nonaka, S.; Harabuchi, Y. P53, N- and K-Ras, and beta-catenin gene mutations and prognostic factors in nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma from Hokkaido, Japan. Hum. Pathol. 2004, 35, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Farazi, T.A.; Spitzer, J.I.; Morozov, P.; Tuschl, T. miRNAs in human cancer. J. Pathol. 2011, 223, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Lai, E.C. microRNAs: Runts of the genome assert themselves. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, R925–R936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Esquela-Kerscher, A.; Slack, F.J. Oncomirs—microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Rupaimoole, R.; Slack, F.J. MicroRNA therapeutics: Towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Broderick, J.A.; Zamore, P.D. MicroRNA therapeutics. Gene Ther. 2011, 18, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Chakraborty, C.; Sharma, A.R.; Sharma, G.; Doss, C.G.P.; Lee, S.-S. Therapeutic miRNA and siRNA: Moving from Bench to Clinic as Next Generation Medicine. Mol. Ther. 2017, 8, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Ott, G.; Rosenwald, A.; Campo, E. Understanding MYC-driven aggressive B-cell lymphomas: Pathogenesis and classification. Blood 2013, 122, 3884–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Sanchez-Martin, M.; Ferrando, A. The NOTCH1-MYC highway toward T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2017, 129, 1124–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Wang, J.-H.; Bi, X.-W.; Li, P.-F.; Xia, Z.-J.; Huang, H.-Q.; Jiang, W.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Wang, L. Overexpression of MYC and BCL2 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type. J. Cancer 2017, 8, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cancers 13 01414 g001 550
Figure 1. Map illustrating the worldwide distribution of extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) in countries with a population of east Asian genetic background. East Asian populations are depicted in blue; countries with high prevalence of ENKTCL are illustrated in dark blue. This map was elaborated using R version 3,6,2 with the package rworldmap [56].
Figure 1. Map illustrating the worldwide distribution of extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) in countries with a population of east Asian genetic background. East Asian populations are depicted in blue; countries with high prevalence of ENKTCL are illustrated in dark blue. This map was elaborated using R version 3,6,2 with the package rworldmap [56].
Cancers 13 01414 g001
Cancers 13 01414 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of the ENKTCL mutation landscape in different populations. The frequency of the mutations of the most common altered genes among these populations is depicted as percentages. The colors indicate the different populations in four different studies: Latin America (orange) [82], Japan (blue) [23], China (green) [22], and Korea (red) [20].
Figure 2. Comparison of the ENKTCL mutation landscape in different populations. The frequency of the mutations of the most common altered genes among these populations is depicted as percentages. The colors indicate the different populations in four different studies: Latin America (orange) [82], Japan (blue) [23], China (green) [22], and Korea (red) [20].
Cancers 13 01414 g002
Cancers 13 01414 g003 550
Figure 3. JAK-STAT signaling pathway and immune response evasion disturbances in ENKTCL. NKTCL biopsy carrying STAT3 activating mutation (c.1919A>T, p. Y640F) belonging to the tumor suppressors and immune modulators (TSIM) molecular group. Large-size tumor cells in a necrosis background are depicted (H&E) positive for pSTAT 3 and PD-L1. ENKTCL biopsy revealing STAT3 wild type. Neoplastic cells lacking an inflammatory background (H&E). In addition, P-STAT3 is negative in the tumor cells but positive in the vessels as an internal control, whereas PD-L1 is similarly negative in most of tumor cells but positive in some reactive histiocytes (H&E stain and Immunohistochemistry 400×). Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; EBER, in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNA.
Figure 3. JAK-STAT signaling pathway and immune response evasion disturbances in ENKTCL. NKTCL biopsy carrying STAT3 activating mutation (c.1919A>T, p. Y640F) belonging to the tumor suppressors and immune modulators (TSIM) molecular group. Large-size tumor cells in a necrosis background are depicted (H&E) positive for pSTAT 3 and PD-L1. ENKTCL biopsy revealing STAT3 wild type. Neoplastic cells lacking an inflammatory background (H&E). In addition, P-STAT3 is negative in the tumor cells but positive in the vessels as an internal control, whereas PD-L1 is similarly negative in most of tumor cells but positive in some reactive histiocytes (H&E stain and Immunohistochemistry 400×). Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; EBER, in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNA.
Cancers 13 01414 g003
Cancers 13 01414 g004 550
Figure 4. ENKTCL harboring MGA frameshift mutation (c.7586 G > A, p.H533*) associated with MYC overexpression belonging to the MB molecular group. ENKTCL with large cell morphology, cells are pleomorphic with pale cytoplasm, and irregular nuclei (H&E stain, 400×); all lymphoma cells show EBER positivity (in situ hybridization 200×) and MYC nuclear expression (immunohistochemistry 400×). Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; EBER, in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNA.
Figure 4. ENKTCL harboring MGA frameshift mutation (c.7586 G > A, p.H533*) associated with MYC overexpression belonging to the MB molecular group. ENKTCL with large cell morphology, cells are pleomorphic with pale cytoplasm, and irregular nuclei (H&E stain, 400×); all lymphoma cells show EBER positivity (in situ hybridization 200×) and MYC nuclear expression (immunohistochemistry 400×). Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; EBER, in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNA.
Cancers 13 01414 g004
Cancers 13 01414 g005 550
Figure 5. ENKTCL harboring ARID1A mutation probably belonging to the HEA molecular group. The morphological hallmark features of ENKTCL are present: coagulative necrosis and large-size pleomorphic neoplastic cells leading to angioinvasion (H&E stain, 200× and 400×). All lymphoma cells show EBER positivity (in situ hybridization, 400×). This case carried also a DDX3X missense mutation (c.1537G>C, p. V513L). Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; EBER, in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNA.
Figure 5. ENKTCL harboring ARID1A mutation probably belonging to the HEA molecular group. The morphological hallmark features of ENKTCL are present: coagulative necrosis and large-size pleomorphic neoplastic cells leading to angioinvasion (H&E stain, 200× and 400×). All lymphoma cells show EBER positivity (in situ hybridization, 400×). This case carried also a DDX3X missense mutation (c.1537G>C, p. V513L). Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; EBER, in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNA.
Cancers 13 01414 g005
Table
Table 1. Geographical distribution of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) strains in T cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Table 1. Geographical distribution of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) strains in T cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
CountryEntitynEBV StrainReference
Type AType B
ChinaENKTCL31 cases29 (93.5%)2 (6.5%)[81]
MexicoENKTCL42 cases39 (93%)3 (7%)[82]
PeruENKTCL27 cases15 (88%)3 (12%)[82]
ArgentinaENKTCL12 cases11 (92%)1 (8%)[82]
KoreaT cell NHL15 cases14 (93.3%)1 (6.7%)[83]
ChinaENKTCL16 cases16 (100%)0[84]
MexicoENKTCL23 cases21 (91%)2 (9%)[6]
China/TaiwanNasal and extranasal PTCL19 cases19 (100%)1 (5.3%)[85]
MalaysiaPTCL9 cases9 (100%)0[86]
DenmarkPTCL18 cases15 (83.3%)3 (16.7%)[86]
ENKTCL: extranodal natural killer T cell lymphoma; n: number of cases reported; PTCL: peripheral T cell lymphomas; NHL: non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Table
Table 3. Main genetic alterations in ENKTCL.
Table 3. Main genetic alterations in ENKTCL.
Genetic AlterationReference
Chromosomal abnormalitiesLosses of 6q21–6q25
(40–50%)		POPDC3, PREP, PRDM1, ATG5, AIM1 and HACE1[126,127]
Other chromosomal alterationsLosses in 5p13, 11q22-q23,11q24-25, 12q3, 13q14, 14q21, 15q24, 17p13, 17p4 and 19q13
Gains in 1q21-q44, 2q13-14, 2q31-q32, 2q5, 3q26, 6p25-p11, 7q34, 7q35-q36, 8q24, 10q3, 13q14, 13q4 and 20q11.		[129,130,134]
Recurrent mutationsJAK-STAT signaling pathwaySTAT3, STAT5b, JAK3,[21,135,136]
RNA helicase familyDDX3X[22]
Tumor suppressorsTP53, MGA[22,23,50]
RAS-MAPK signaling pathwayNOTCH3, EPHA1, PTPRQ, PTPRK, GNAQ[81,137]
ApoptosisFAS[138,139]
Epigenetic modifiersARID1A, ASXL1, BCOR, KMT2D, MLL2, EP300[23,124,125]
Epigenetic alterationsHyper methylation Cell cycle regulators: CDKN2A, CDKN2B, CDKN1A
Tumor suppressors: BCL2L11 (BIM), DAPK1, PTPN6 (SHP1), TET2, SOCS6, and ASNS. 		[140]
[141]
Histone modificationsEZH2: histone methyltransferase, aberrant overexpressed in ENKTCL, leading to activation of NF-kB signaling pathway. [142,143,144]
mi-RNAsDownregulatedmiR-26a, miR-26b, miR-28-5, miR-101 and miR-363.
De-regulated miR-146a: leading to inhibition of TRAF6, downregulating NF-kB signaling.		[144,145]
UpregulatedmiR-155 and miR21[137,146]
Gene
Overexpression		Survivin:Induced by LMP1, EBV latent viral proteins[147]
MYC:Upregulation possibly through LMP1 latent viral protein. [81,148,149]
PD-L1:Overexpression of the cell death ligand favoring immune evasion[150,151,152]
RUNX3:Mediated by MYC, resulting in decreased apoptosis and increase cell proliferation[148]
AURKA:Increased cell proliferation[153]
PDGFRA:Overexpression of PDGFRα but absence of genomic alteration[154]
OtherCD38Transmembrane protein associated with poor outcome[155]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montes-Mojarro, I.A.; Fend, F.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L. EBV and the Pathogenesis of NK/T Cell Lymphoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061414

AMA Style

Montes-Mojarro IA, Fend F, Quintanilla-Martinez L. EBV and the Pathogenesis of NK/T Cell Lymphoma. Cancers. 2021; 13(6):1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061414

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montes-Mojarro, Ivonne A., Falko Fend, and Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez. 2021. "EBV and the Pathogenesis of NK/T Cell Lymphoma" Cancers 13, no. 6: 1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061414

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop