Next Article in Journal
CAR-T after Stem Cell Transplantation in B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders: Are They Really Autologous or Allogenic Cell Therapies?
Next Article in Special Issue
Machine Learning for Recurrence Prediction of Gynecologic Cancers Using Lynch Syndrome-Related Screening Markers
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolic Hormones Modulate Macrophage Inflammatory Responses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions during Endoscopy Surveillance in Patients with Lynch Syndrome: A Multicentre Cohort Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 13
Issue 18
10.3390/cancers13184662
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MiR-137 Targets the 3′ Untranslated Region of MSH2: Potential Implications in Lynch Syndrome-Related Colorectal Cancer

by
Raffaella Liccardo
,
Raffaele Sessa
,
Silvia Trombetti
,
Marina De Rosa
,
Paola Izzo
,
Michela Grosso
and
Francesca Duraturo
*
Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università di Napoli Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2021, 13(18), 4662; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184662
Received: 5 August 2021 / Revised: 13 September 2021 / Accepted: 15 September 2021 / Published: 17 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lynch Syndrome)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In a previous study, we identified a patient carrying the variant c.*226A>G in the MSH2 3′ untranslated region that showed overexpression of MSH2 protein. In this study, we hypothesized that the MSH2 3′UTR contained a seed region for miR-137, indicating MSH2 was indeed targeted by miR-137. Our in vitro studies showed an inverse correlation between miR-137 and MSH2; this functional interaction was also confirmed in normal and tumoral tissue samples from the patient carrying the c.*226A>G variant in the MSH2 3′UTR.

Abstract

Mismatch Repair (MMR) gene dysregulation plays a fundamental role in Lynch Syndrome (LS) pathogenesis, a form of hereditary colorectal cancer. Loss or overexpression of key MMR genes leads to genome instability and tumorigenesis; however, the mechanisms controlling MMR gene expression are unknown. One such gene, MSH2, exerts an important role, not only in MMR, but also in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle control. In this study, we explored the functions and underlying molecular mechanisms of increased MSH2 expression related to a c.*226A>G variant in the 3′untranslated (UTR) region of MSH2 that had been previously identified in a subject clinically suspected of LS. Bioinformatics identified a putative binding site for miR-137 in this region. To verify miRNA targeting specificity, we performed luciferase gene reporter assays using a MSH2 3′UTR psiCHECK-2 vector in human SW480 cells over-expressing miR-137, which showed a drastic reduction in luciferase activity (p > 0.0001). This effect was abolished by site-directed mutagenesis of the putative miR-137 seed site. Moreover, in these cells we observed that miR-137 levels were inversely correlated with MSH2 expression levels. These results were confirmed by results in normal and tumoral tissues from the patient carrying the 3′UTR c.*226A>G variant in MSH2. Finally, miR-137 overexpression in SW480 cells significantly suppressed cell proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner (p < 0.0001), supporting a role for MSH2 in apoptosis and cell proliferation processes. Our findings suggest miR-137 helps control MSH2 expression via its 3′UTR and that dysregulation of this mechanism appears to promote tumorigenesis in colon cells.

1. Introduction

Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is derived from loss of function of MMR proteins. Approximately 10–15% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs) are MMR-deficient [1]. At the somatic level, this condition determines microsatellite instability (MSI) [2,3,4,5]. In some instances, MMR deficiency is associated with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation which is responsible for sporadic CRC with MSI [6,7], whereas on other occasions, it correlates with germline pathogenic variants in MMR genes responsible for the Lynch Syndrome (LS) phenotype [3,4,5,8]. MSH2 and MLH1, but also MSH6 and PMS2 are the most common pathogenetic variants [2,3,4,9,10,11,12] determining MMR deficiency in tumoral tissue; this is due to altered MMR protein functionality. However, it is accepted that in addition to canonical roles in MMR, the MMR pathway is also involved in a signaling cascade leading to cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis [13,14,15,16] in the presence of DNA damage. Therefore, if the MMR system is proficient in cells, DNA damage levels may stimulate the system to inhibit the cell cycle or stimulate apoptosis [14]. Additionally, if MMR deficiency occurs in cells, the cell cycle does not block or activate apoptosis facilitating uncontrollable net cell division increases, therefore contributing to an increased mutation rate. This becomes manifest as MSI and/or abnormal MMR as shown by immunohistochemistry [16]. However, these MMR protein-driven mechanisms remain unclear [17,18]. To date, several hypotheses purporting to account for loss of function of the MMR system have been postulated. For example, etiological factors such as microRNAs (miRNAs) strongly influence repair functions within the MMR complex, with significant effects on disease progression [8,19,20,21,22]. MiRNAs constitute a family of small, single-stranded endogenous, non-coding, RNAs of approximately 21–25 nucleotides, the fundamental role of which is to negatively regulate gene expression at post-transcriptional levels. Individual miRNAs may be considered to be small control elements contributing to complex pathways underlying many fundamental functions, including cell cycle regulation, cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [23]. However, it is unclear if alterations in miRNA expression levels at tumor tissue are the cause or consequence of processes directly involved in tumorigenesis [24,25]. For example, a single nucleotide substitution in the miRNA ‘seed’ region (isomiR), or variants in messenger RNA target sites, can create or abolish miRNA interactions with molecular targets, and therefore induce expression variations in corresponding miRNAs or variations in target gene expression [19,22,26].
Several studies have described miRNA associations with colorectal tumorigenesis, with a possible role for miRNAs in MLH1 regulatory expression [22,27,28].
Recently, we described a patient case where MSH2 overexpression was likely related to a loss of MSH2 down-regulation due to a nucleotide variant in the 3′UTR [8]. Preliminary bioinformatics analyses showed this region was a putative target site for miRNAs. Therefore, we investigated if the MSH2 3′UTR was a target site for miRNA-137, and examined if MSH2 underwent post-transcriptional regulation by miR-137.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bioinformatic Analysis

For the identification of putative miRNA target sites, TargetScan 6.2 (http://www.targetscan.org, accessed on June 2012) and miRanda 3.3 (http://www.microrna.org, accessed on August 2010) software were used.

2.2. Luciferase Constructs and Reporter Assay

The MSH2 3′ UTR of a carrier of the mutation c.*226 A>G was amplified by PCR with a primer pair containing XhoI and NotI restriction sites as already described. Oligonucleotide sequences were as follows: XhoI-3′ UTR MSH2 forward: ATACTCGAGAAAATCCCAGTAATGGAATG and NotI-3′ UTR MSH2 reverse: ATAGCGGCCGCTTCAAATTCCACAAACTACA. The PCR product was cloned into the PSICHECK2 vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) downstream of the Renilla luciferase coding region (hRluc). The orientation of the wild-type (WT) and mutated (MUT) inserted products was established by digestion and confirmed by sequencing. The PSICHECK2 constructs with additional mutations in the target site for miR-137 were generated using the QuiKChange Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Oligonucleotide sequences for site-directed mutagenesis were as follows: 3′UTR MSH2 MUT1 forward, GGACTGTTTGCAATTGACATAGGTACTgATAAGTGATGTGCTG and reverse, CAGCACATCACTTATcAGTACCTATGTCAATTGCAAACAGTCC; 3′UTR MSH2 MUT2 forward, GGACTGTTTGCAATTGACATAGGTCCGgATAAGTGATGTGCTG, and reverse, CAGCACATCACTTATcCGGACCTATGTCAATTGCAAACAGTCC (seed region is underscored, patient mutated base is in lowercase, and additional mutated bases are in bold, Figure 1A). Luciferase activity was measured 48 h after transfection using a dual luciferase reporter assay (Promega) according to manufacturer’s instructions and performed on a 20n/20n luminometer (Turner BioSystems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Relative luciferase activity was calculated by normalizing the Renilla luminescence to the firefly luminescence [29].

2.3. Cell Culture and Transfection

SW480 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (ATCC CCL-228) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% GlutaMAX-I (Gibco Invitrogen Life Technologies, CA, USA), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco Invitrogen Life Technologies). The cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2-humidified atmosphere and were kept sub-confluent (70–80%) for the subsequent transfection experiments. Twenty-four hours before transfection, adherent cells were plated into 96-well plates at a density of 25 × 103 cells/well (70–90% confluence) in 100 µL of Optimem medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies) in the absence of serum/antibiotics. Transfections for luciferase assay were carried out using 30 ng of each PSICHECK2 construct with 30 pmol of miRNA precursor hsa-miR-137 or relative FAM negative control (Ambion, Life Technologies, CA, USA).
Total endogenous RNA and protein were isolated from SW480 cells after transfection with 15 and 30 pmol pre-miR miRNA precursor hsa-miR-137 or relative FAM pre-miR-negative control, as previously described [30,31]. Similarly, total endogenous RNA and protein were isolated from SW480 cells after transfection with 30, and 60 of anti-miR miRNA inhibitor hsa-miR-137 or relative FAM negative control (Ambion, Life Technologies). Twenty-four hours before transfection, adherent cells were plated into 6-well plates at a density of 25 × 103 cells/well (60–70% confluence) in 2 mL of Optimem medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies) in the absence of serum/antibiotics.
All transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4. SW480 Total RNA and Protein Analysis

Total RNA and protein were extracted 48 h after miRNA and anti-miRNA transfection. RNA was isolated with TRIZOL solution according to the manufacturer’s protocols, and was used to determine endogenous mRNA levels of MSH2 and actin (internal control) according to the same protocol reported for RNA analysis of patient carrying the variant in MSH2 3′UTR gene [8]. The dosage of miR-137 levels was performed using a TaqMan MiRNA RT and Assay kit (Applied Biosystems, Inc.,Waltham, Massachusetts, Stati Uniti), with small nucleolar RNA RNU6B (Applied Biosystems, Inc.) as a normalization gene. Real-time PCR reactions were performed in triplicate.
Total protein was isolated using cell lysis buffer containing 10% glycerol, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA pH 8, and 10 µL of protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). Quantification of MSH2 and actin (loading control) was performed as described for the patient protein analysis [8].

2.5. Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tissues RNA Isolation and Expression Assay

miRNA and mRNA were extracted from FFPE samples of colon tumor and normal tissue of patient carrying variant in 3′UTR of MSH2 gene using Qiagen miReasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA quantity was assessed using the Qubit RNA BR Assay Kit (Invitrogen, by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eugene, Oregon, USA). The expression of miR-137 and MSH2 as well as the relative endogenous controls, U6 snRNA and GAPDH, respectively, were determined using TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit and specific TaqMan miRNA assays (Taq-Man, Applied Biosystems, Inc.,Waltham, Massachusetts, Stati Uniti). All qRT-PCR assays for normal and tumor sample were performed in triplicate using the same amount of isolated RNA.

2.6. Analysis of Cell Proliferation

Cell viability was determined using the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay. Briefly, after transient transfection with 15 and 30 pmol of pre-miR-137 and pre-miR negative control, SW480 cells were seeded into a 96 well plate at a concentration of 5 × 103 cells/100 μL. At 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hrs after transfection, respectively, 10 μL of MTT labeling reagent provided by the Cell Proliferation Kit 1 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) was added to each well as previously reported [32]. Measurement of the soluble formazan product in each well was carried out by photometric reading at 570/690 nm on a Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). The experiments were repeated three times for each transfection. All data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation of three separate experiments. Statistical differences between mock control and treated cells were calculated using the one-way analysis of variance procedure followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, where appropriate. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 (*) and highly significant when p < 0.0001 (**) versus each respective control or untreated control group.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data from luciferase assays, real-time quantitative PCR, and Western blot analysis were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., 2365 Northside Dr. Suite 560 San Diego, CA 92108). Mean values (±S.D.) were calculated. Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test. Data were considered statistically significant when p-value was <0.05 and highly significant when p- value was <0.0001.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of MiR-137 Using in Silico Analysis

In our previous study, we showed that a point mutation in the 3′UTR of MSH2 (c.*226A>G) determined MSH2 overexpression and was associated with LS [8]. Here, we performed further computational analyses using TargetScan 6.2 and miRanda 3.3 software to identify a putative binding site for miRNA to explain the regulatory loss of the MSH2 transcript. In the MSH2 3′UTR, we identified a putative binding site for miRNA-137 which was altered by the presence of the c.*226A>G mutation, suggesting a possible role for miR-137 in negatively regulating MSH2 expression.

3.2. Functional Effects of the MSH2 3′UTR Variant on Luciferase Reporter Expression

In this study, to confirm MSH2 as a direct target of miR-137, WT MSH2 3′UTR luciferase plasmid and 3′UTR mutants were co-transfected with 30 pmol pre-miR-137 precursor and a relative Fluorescein Amidites (FAM)negative control. Relative luciferase activity was significantly reduced in the presence of pre-miR-137 (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1). Additionally, gene reporter assays indicated miRNA-mediated MSH2 regulation occurring at the 3′UTR site. Only when the putative seed region for miR-137 (WT) was kept unmodified there was a reduction in reporter gene activity compared to the control (Figure 1C) This effect was abolished by site-directed mutagenesis in the putative miR-137 seed site, suggesting MSH2 3′ UTR (position 221–227) was the direct target of miR-137. Among mutants, we found a direct correlation between the number of mutated nucleotides within the seed region and the increased luciferase activity. In fact, the MUT and MUT1 constructs containing a partly mutated seed sequence (Figure 1A) showed a slight reduction in the luciferase activity (Figure 1C) whereas the MUT2 construct showed no variation in gene expression when compared to the control (Figure 1C).

3.3. MiR-137 Regulates MSH2 Expression

We transfected pre-miR-137 and anti-miR-137 into SW480 cells at different concentrations. As expected, pre-miR and anti-miR transfected into SW480 cells have determined increased and decreased miR-137 levels, respectively, when compared with not transfected cells (Figure 2). Thus, in these cells, we measured MSH2 mRNA and protein levels. We showed that miR-137 overexpression was associated with MSH2 down-regulation at both mRNA and protein levels, suggesting ectopic miR-137 correlated with a significant decrease in these levels (Figure 2B,C). SW480 cells were also transfected with anti-miR-137 to demonstrate miR-137 specificity toward MSH2. In this scenario, blocking endogenous miR-137 activity with anti-miR-137 treatment increased mRNA and protein MSH2 production, confirming a negative regulatory role for miR-137 on MSH2 (Figure 2B,C).

3.4. MiR-137 and mRNA MSH2 Levels Are Inversely Correlated in a Patient Carrying a 3′UTR Variant, the c.*226A>G

We determined the relative expression of miRNA-137 and MSH2 mRNA levels in normal and tumoral colon sample from a patient carrying the 3′UTR MSH2 variant, the c.*226A>G. Tumor tissue (T) showed significantly reduced miR-137 expression when compared with the normal section (N), while significant MSH2 overexpression was observed in the tumor versus the normal sample (Figure 3).

3.5. MiR-137 Effects on SW480 Cell Proliferation

A 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was performed on SW480 cells transfected with pre-miR-137 and pre-miR scramble (SCR) and showed that miR-137 overexpression significantly suppressed cell proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner (** p < 0.0001). In particular, at 72 h post-transfection with pre-miR-137, progressively reduced cell proliferation, even when compared with the pre-miR SCR counterpart (Figure 4), was observed. These data suggested a potential anti-proliferative role for miR-137 in these cells.

4. Discussion

We investigated the increased MSH2 expression, previously identified in an individual clinically suspected with LS, and carrying a 3′UTR region sequence variant. Our data suggested miR-137 controlled MSH2 expression via the 3′UTR, and its dysregulation putatively promoted tumorigenesis in colon cells. Recently, Zhou et al. reported the role of miR-137 in LS tumor pathogenesis [33], potentially reinforcing our hypothesis that MSH2 is targeted by miR-137.
Several reports have suggested that MMR cellular levels are tightly regulated [21,22,24]. In addition to the well-characterized oncogenic events such as genetic amplification, mutation, and translocation, MMR dysregulation also leads to loss of the MMR system [34,35,36]. Bioinformatics analyses predicted the presence of a miR-137 seed region in the MSH2 3′UTR—with our in vitro results confirming MSH2 is targeted by miR-137. MiR-137, which is located on human chromosome 1p22, is reportedly present in neuronal cells [37,38,39,40], but is also found constitutively expressed in normal colonic epithelium [27,28,41,42,43,44], while low expression is found in adenomatous polyps and tumoral colorectal tissues [21]. Moreover, miR-137 locus is frequently hypermethylated in several tumor types, including colorectal, gastric, breast, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and colorectal adenomatous tissue [45,46,47,48]. It was also reported that miR-137 locus hypermethylation was associated with MSI [48,49,50]. Previous data indicated that average methylation levels of miR-137 locus were much higher (approximately 80%) in most colon cell lines, including HCT116, RKO, SW48, and HT29, but not LoVo and SW480 cells where miR-137 methylation was found around 28–29%, respectively [48]. However, LoVo cells are constitutively MSH2-deficient as well established in the literature [51,52] and, therefore unsuitable for the aim of this study. Based on the lower methylation status of miR-137 locus, only the SW480 cell system was found to be suitable for our expression studies with respect to other colon cancer cell lines commercially available, to better evaluate the correlation between miR-137 and its potential target gene, MSH2 in the specific case.
Transient transfection of SW480 cells with a WT reporter plasmid and a miR-137 precursor decreased luciferase activity that remained unaffected following transfection with the mutated 3′UTR constructs, as reported in Figure 1. In our previous study [8] beyond a higher luciferase activity than in the construct with the WT 3′ UTR, a greater luciferase expression was observed in proportion to the number of additional mutations created by in vitro mutagenesis. Therefore, we hypothesized that the MSH2 3′UTR contained a seed region for miR-137, indicating MSH2 was indeed targeted by miR-137. Additionally, our in vitro studies showed an inverse correlation between miR-137 and MSH2 in SW480 cells; this functional interaction was also confirmed in normal and tumoral tissue samples from patient carrying the c.*226A>G variant in the MSH2 3′UTR. In a previous study, in this patient, MSH2 was found to be overexpressed at the somatic level, as confirmed by immunohistochemistry [8]. In the current study, we confirmed this result also on mRNA extracted from the tumoral tissue. Moreover, we observed a reduced expression of miR-137, likely associated with hypermethylation of the miR-137 locus, as described in tumor tissues (colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma) and in most of the colon cancer cells lines commercially available [48]. However, also molecular alterations that create or abolish miRNA interactions with molecular targets could determine expression variations in corresponding miRNAs [19,22,26]. Therefore, we propose miR-137 negatively regulates MSH2 expression at the post-transcriptional level. Although the use of a single cell line may have limited our study outcomes, we believe that using other CRC cell lines may have provided misleading results due to the high degree of miR-137 methylation potentially masking this inverse relationship between miR-137 and MSH2. Furthermore, we directly validated this result using normal and tumor tissue derived from the patient that in our opinion could represent a more physiologically relevant setting to corroborate our findings. Another possible study limitation was that we could not confirm our observations in other patients carrying this variant in MSH2 3′UTR because no other family members were available for this study. In our patient, this inverse correlational relationship could be due to sequence variants preventing miR-137 binding to MSH2; meaning MSH2 regulation is lost. Increased MSH2 expression could result in a failure to form a functioning heterodimer (MUTS), generating an unstable phenotype during LS tumorigenesis [20]. However, increased MSH2 mRNA could also directly favor the tumorigenic process. Several studies reported that the MSH2 protein was involved in apoptosis and cell proliferation [53]. It is accepted that MutSα (MSH2-MSH6 heterodimer) and MutLα (MLH1-PMS2 heterodimer) directly recruit ATM/ATR to induce cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis [54] and that loss of MMR function system increases mutation frequency and is associated with tumorigenesis [15]. Therefore, dysregulated MSH2 expression could prevent apoptosis and favor a tumorigenic state. In this respect, our cell viability data confirmed the suppressor role of miR-137 toward SW480 proliferation, in agreement with MSH2 functions in apoptotic and tumorigenesis processes. Thus, we hypothesize that MSH2 overexpression, due to a loss of miR-137 targeting and aberrant MUTS heterodimer formation, could interfere with cell cycle proteins to promote tumorigenesis. Therefore, following miR-137 methylation in CRC cell lines and tissue [48], we speculate MSH2 loses its regulatory capabilities resulting in increased genomic instability and tumorigenesis. Although further studies are required to corroborate our observations, we hypothesize miR-137 putatively acts as a MSH2 regulator via its 3′UTR.
In conclusion, our data suggest miR-137 targets the 3′UTR region of MSH2 mRNA and directly down-regulates MSH2 expression. Moreover, our study highlighted the important role of miRNAs as regulators of MMR gene expression.
Further investigations are required to identify the potential prognostic and therapeutic implications of miR-137 in patients with LS to provide precision medicines for this pathogenic condition [55].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study has provided a new insight on the molecular mechanisms that regulate the MMR gene products. Our work has highlighted the important role of miRNA molecules as likely regulators of MMR gene expression, whose effects are often mediated through binding with 3′ UTRs. To our best knowledge, this is the first report indicating that miR-137 regulates MSH2 expression. Moreover, we have confirmed the widely reported tumor-suppressive function of miR-137 that demonstrated its implication in LS as a negative regulator of MSH2. Further investigations will be required to identify the potential prognostic and therapeutic implications of miR-137 in LS patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.D. and P.I.; methodology, F.D., R.L. and R.S.; software, F.D., R.L. and R.S.; validation, F.D., S.T. and R.S.; formal analysis, F.D. and R.S.; investigation, F.D., R.L., S.T. and R.S.; resources, F.D., S.T., M.D.R. and R.S.; data curation, F.D., S.T. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, F.D.; writing—review and editing, F.D. and M.G.; visualization, F.D. and M.G.; supervision, F.D. and P.I.; project administration, F.D.; funding acquisition, F.D. and P.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by ATENEO Federico II, Duraturo fundig-2018 and by the Regione Campania “SATIN” grant 2018–2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by local ethics committee ‘Comitato Etico per le Attività Biomediche “Carlo Romano”’ at the University of Naples, Federico II (protocol no. 120/10).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pećina-Šlaus, N.; Kafka, A.; Salamon, I.; Bukovac, A. Mismatch Repair Pathway, Genome Stability and Cancer. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Duraturo, F.; Liccardo, R.; De Rosa, M.; Izzo, P. Genetics, diagnosis and treatment of Lynch syndrome: Old lessons and current challenges. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 17, 3048–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  3. Duraturo, F.; Liccardo, R.; Cavallo, A.; De Rosa, M.; Rossi, G.B.; Izzo, P. Multivariate analysis as a method for evaluating the pathogenicity of novel genetic MLH1 variants in patients with colorectal cancer and microsatellite instability. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2015, 36, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  4. Duraturo, F.; Cavallo, A.; Liccardo, R.; Cudia, B.; De Rosa, M.; Diana, G.; Izzo, P. Contribution of large genomic rearrangements in Italian Lynch syndrome patients: Characterization of a novel alu-mediated deletion. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 219897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Liccardo, R.; De Rosa, M.; Rossi, G.B.; Carlomagno, N.; Izzo, P.; Duraturo, F. Incomplete Segregation of MSH6 Frameshift Variants with Phenotype of Lynch Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  6. Kahn, R.M.; Gordhandas, S.; Maddy, B.P.; Baltich Nelson, B.; Askin, G.; Christos, P.J.; Caputo, T.A.; Chapman-Davis, E.; Holcomb, K.; Frey, M.K. Universal endometrial cancer tumor typing: How much has immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, and MLH1 methylation improved the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome across the population? Cancer 2019, 125, 3172–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Coppedè, F. The role of epigenetics in colorectal cancer. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 8, 935–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liccardo, R.; Nolano, A.; Lambiase, M.; Della Ragione, C.; De Rosa, M.; Izzo, P.; Duraturo, F. MSH2 Overexpression Due to an Unclassified Variant in 3′-Untranslated Region in a Patient with Colon Cancer. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liccardo, R.; De Rosa, M.; Izzo, P.; Duraturo, F. Novel MSH2 splice-site mutation in a young patient with Lynch syndrome. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 6942–6946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Liccardo, R.; Della Ragione, C.; Mitilini, N.; De Rosa, M.; Izzo, P.; Duraturo, F. Novel variants of unknown significance in the PMS2 gene identified in patients with hereditary colon cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 18, 6719–6725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Liccardo, R.; De Rosa, M.; Rossi, G.B.; Rigler, G.; Izzo, P.; Duraturo, F. Characterization of novel, large duplications in the MSH2 gene of three unrelated Lynch syndrome patients. Cancer Genet. 2018, 221, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Duraturo, F.; Liccardo, R.; Izzo, P. Coexistence of MLH3 germline variants in colon cancer patients belonging to families with Lynch syndrome-associated brain tumors. J. Neurooncol. 2016, 129, 577–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Poulogiannis, G.; Frayling, I.M.; Arends, M.J. DNA mismatch repair deciency in sporadic colorectal cancer and Lynch syndrome. Histopathology 2010, 56, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  14. Toft, N.J.; Winton, D.J.; Kelly, J.; Howard, L.A.; Dekker, M.; te Riele, H.; Arends, M.J.; Wyllie, A.H.; Margison, G.P.; Clarke, A.R. Msh2 status modulates both apoptosis and mutation frequency in the murine small intestine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 3911–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  15. Zhang, H.; Richards, B.; Wilson, T.; Lloyd, M.; Cranston, A.; Thorburn, A.; Fishel, R.; Meuth, M. Apoptosis induced by overexpression of hMSH2 or hMLH1. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 3021–3027. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tomlinson, I.; Bodmer, W. Selection, the mutation rate and cancer: Ensuring that the tail does not wag the dog. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stojic, L.; Mojas, N.; Cejka, P.; Di Pietro, M.; Ferrari, S.; Marra, G.; Jiricny, J. Mismatch repair-dependent G2 checkpoint induced by low doses of SN1 type methylating agents requires the ATR kinase. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 1331–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  18. Yoshioka, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Hsieh, P. ATR kinase activation mediated by MutSalpha and MutLalpha in response to cytotoxic O6-methylguanine adducts. Mol. Cell 2006, 22, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mao, G.; Lee, S.; Ortega, J.; Gu, L.; Li, G.M. Modulation of microRNA processing by mismatch repair protein MutLα. Cell Res. 2012, 22, 973–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  20. Qu, X.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, R.; Wei, Q.; Wang, M. Differential microRNA expression profiles associated with microsatellite status reveal possible epigenetic regulation of microsatellite instability in gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Svrcek, M.; El-Murr, N.; Wanherdrick, K.; Dumont, S.; Beaugerie, L.; Cosnes, J.; Colombel, J.F.; Tiret, E.; Fléjou, J.F.; Lesuffleur, T.; et al. Overexpression of microRNAs-155 and 21 targeting mismatch repair proteins in inflammatory bowel diseases. Carcinogenesis 2013, 34, 828–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  22. Mao, G.; Pan, X.; Gu, L. Evidence that a mutation in the MLH1 3′-untranslated region confers a mutator phenotype and mismatch repair deficiency in patients with relapsed leukemia. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 3211–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  23. Cummins, J.M.; He, Y.; Leary, R.J.; Pagliarini, R.; Diaz, L.A., Jr.; Sjoblom, T.; Barad, O.; Bentwich, Z.; Szafranska, A.E.; Labourier, E.; et al. The colorectal microRNAome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 3687–3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  24. Landau, D.A.; Frank, J.S. MicroRNAs in Mutagenesis, Genomic Instability and DNA Repair. Semin Oncol. 2011, 38, 743–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  25. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009, 136, 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  26. Fabian, M.R.; Sonenberg, N.; Filipowicz, W. Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79, 351–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  27. Dong, Y.; Yu, J.; Ng, S.S. MicroRNA dysregulation as a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2014, 6, 405–422. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bi, W.P.; Xia, M.; Wang, X.J. miR-137 suppresses proliferation, migration and invasion of colon cancer cell lines by targeting TCF4. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 8744–8748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  29. Sodaro, G.; Blasio, G.; Fiorentino, F.; Auberger, P.; Costanzo, P.; Cesaro, E. ZNF224 is a transcriptional repressor of AXL in chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Biochimie 2018, 154, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cesaro, E.; Pastore, A.; Polverino, A.; Manna, L.; Divisato, G.; Quintavalle, C.; Di Sanzo, M.; Faniello, M.C.; Grosso, M.; Costanzo, P. ZNF224 is a mediator of TGF-β pro-oncogenic function in melanoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2021, ddab173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Montano, G.; Vidovic, K.; Palladino, C.; Cesaro, E.; Sodano, G.; Quintarelli, C.; De Angelis, B.; Errichiello, S.; Pane, F.; Izzo, P.; et al. WT1-mediated repression of the proapoptotic transcription factor ZNF224 is triggered by the BCR-ABL oncogene. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 28223–28237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  32. Turano, M.; Costabile, V.; Cerasuolo, A.; Duraturo, F.; Liccardo, R.; Delrio, P.; Pace, U.; Rega, D.; Dodaro, C.A.; Milone, M.; et al. Characterisation of mesenchymal colon tumour-derived cells in tumourspheres as a model for colorectal cancer progression. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 53, 2379–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  33. Zhou, C.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Wan, Y.; Li, T.; Ma, P.; Wang, Y.; Sang, H. Hsa-miR-137, hsa-miR-520e and hsa-miR-590-3p perform crucial roles in Lynch syndrome. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 12, 2011–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  34. Ma, J.; Zeng, S. Relation between mismatch repair genes and colon cancer. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2014, 39, 190–194. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yamamoto, H.; Imai, K. Microsatellite instability: An update. Arch. Toxicol. 2015, 89, 899–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yamamoto, H.; Adachi, Y.; Taniguchi, H.; Kunimoto, H.; Nosho, K.; Suzuki, H.; Shinomura, Y. Interrelationship between microsatellite instability and microRNA in gastrointestinal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 2745–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smrt, R.D.; Szulwach, K.E.; Pfeiffer, R.L.; Li, X.; Guo, W.; Pathania, M.; Teng, Z.Q.; Luo, Y.; Peng, J.; Bordey, A.; et al. MicroRNA miR-137 regulates neuronal maturation by targeting ubiquitin ligase Mind Bomb-1. Stem Cells. 2010, 28, 1060–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  38. Silber, J.; Lim, D.A.; Petritsch, C.; Persson, A.I.; Maunakea, A.K.; Yu, M.; Vandenberg, S.R.; Ginzinger, D.G.; James, C.D.; Costello, J.F.; et al. miR-124 and miR-137 inhibit proliferation of glioblastoma multiforme cells and induce differentiation of brain tumor stem cells. BMC Med. 2008, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, S.; Li, A.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, M.; Sun, Y.; Qin, W.; Yu, C.; Jiang, T.; Liu, B. MIR137 polygenic risk is associated with schizophrenia and affects functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Psychol. Med. 2020, 50, 1510–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jovčevska, I. Sequencing the next generation of glioblastomas. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2018, 55, 264–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, M.; Lang, N.; Qiu, M.; Xu, F.; Li, Q.; Tang, Q.; Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; et al. miR-137 targets Cdc42 expression, induces cell cycle G1 arrest and inhibits invasion in colorectal cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 128, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xu, J.; Wu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, C.; Zhang, J. Long Noncoding RNA DSCAM-AS1 Facilitates Colorectal Cancer Cell Proliferation and Migration via miR-137/Notch1 Axis. J. Cancer 2020, 11, 6623–6632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fu, Y.; Yin, Y.; Peng, S.; Yang, G.; Yu, Y.; Guo, C.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, W.; Qin, Y. Small nucleolar RNA host gene 1 promotes development and progression of colorectal cancer through negative regulation of miR-137. Mol. Carcinog. 2019, 58, 2104–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  44. Kashani, E.; Hadizadeh, M.; Chaleshi, V.; Mirfakhraie, R.; Young, C.; Savabkar, S.; Irani, S.; Asadzadeh Aghdaei, H.; Ashrafian Bonab, M. The Differential DNA Hypermethylation Patterns of microRNA-137 and microRNA-342 Locus in Early Colorectal Lesions and Tumours. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  45. Bemis, L.T.; Chen, R.; Amato, C.M.; Classen, E.H.; Robinson, S.E.; Coffey, D.G.; Erickson, P.F.; Shellman, Y.G.; Robinson, W.A. MicroRNA-137 targets microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in melanoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 1362–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  46. Langevin, S.M.; Stone, R.A.; Bunker, C.H.; Grandis, J.R.; Sobol, R.W.; Taioli, E. MicroRNA-137 promoter methylation in oral rinses from patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is associated with gender and body mass index. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  47. Langevin, S.M.; Stone, R.A.; Bunker, C.H.; Lyons-Weiler, M.A.; LaFramboise, W.A.; Kelly, L.; Seethala, R.R.; Grandis, J.R.; Sobol, R.W.; Taioli, E. MicroRNA-137 promoter methylation is associated with poorer overall survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 2011, 117, 1454–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  48. Balaguer, F.; Link, A.; Lozano, J.J.; Cuatrecasas, M.; Nagasaka, T.; Boland, C.R.; Goel, A. Epigenetic silencing of miR-137 is an early event in colorectal carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 6609–6618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  49. Zhang, W.; Chen, J.H.; Shan, T.; Aguilera-Barrantes, I.; Wang, L.S.; Huang, T.H.M.; Rader, J.S.; Sheng, X.; Huang, Y.W. miR-137 is a tumor suppressor in endometrial cancer and is repressed by DNA hypermethylation. Lab. Investig. 2018, 98, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  50. Banno, K.; Yanokura, M.; Iida, M.; Masuda, K.; Aoki, D. Carcinogenic mechanisms of endometrial cancer: Involvement of genetics and epigenetics. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2014, 40, 1957–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hassen, S.; Ali, A.A.; Kilaparty, S.P.; Al-Anbaky, Q.A.; Majeed, W.; Boman, B.M.; Fields, J.Z.; Ali, N. Interdependence of DNA mismatch repair proteins MLH1 and MSH2 in apoptosis in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2016, 412, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mendez-Bermudez, A.; Royle, N.J. Deficiency in DNA mismatch repair increases the rate of telomere shortening in normal human cells. Hum. Mutat. 2011, 32, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cerretelli, G.; Ager, A.; Arends, M.J.; Frayling, I.M. Molecular pathology of Lynch syndrome. J. Pathol. 2020, 250, 518–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  54. Gupta, D.; Lin, B.; Cowan, A.; Heinen, C.D. ATR-Chk1 activation mitigates replication stress caused by mismatch repair-dependent processing of DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 1523–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  55. Turano, M.; Delrio, P.; Rega, D.; Cammarota, F.; Polverino, A.; Duraturo, F.; Izzo, P.; De Rosa, M. Promising Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers for Precision Prevention and Therapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
Cancers 13 04662 g001 550
Figure 1. Luciferase MSH2 3′UTR constructs and luciferase reporter assay. (A) Wild-type (WT) and mutant MSH2 3′UTR reporter constructs are shown, aligned with the native miR-137 sequence. MSH2 target sequences complementary to the miR-137 seed region are shown in bold and mutated bases are underlined. (B) Schematic representation of luciferase reporter gene construct. Constructs were cloned into the PSICHECK2 vector (Materials and Methods). (C) Reporter luciferase activity in WT and mutated (MUT, MUT1, MUT2) MSH2 3′UTR was measured in SW480 cells after transfection with pre-miR-137 and pre-miR scramble, (SCR) reagents. Data were normalized to Firefly luciferase activity. Values are expressed in percentages as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 4 samples assayed in 3 independent experiments (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001).
Figure 1. Luciferase MSH2 3′UTR constructs and luciferase reporter assay. (A) Wild-type (WT) and mutant MSH2 3′UTR reporter constructs are shown, aligned with the native miR-137 sequence. MSH2 target sequences complementary to the miR-137 seed region are shown in bold and mutated bases are underlined. (B) Schematic representation of luciferase reporter gene construct. Constructs were cloned into the PSICHECK2 vector (Materials and Methods). (C) Reporter luciferase activity in WT and mutated (MUT, MUT1, MUT2) MSH2 3′UTR was measured in SW480 cells after transfection with pre-miR-137 and pre-miR scramble, (SCR) reagents. Data were normalized to Firefly luciferase activity. Values are expressed in percentages as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 4 samples assayed in 3 independent experiments (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.0001).
Cancers 13 04662 g001
Cancers 13 04662 g002 550
Figure 2. Transfection of pre-miR-137 and anti-miR-137 reagents into SW480 cells. (A) Transfected pre-miR-137 (15 and 30 pmol) and anti-miR-137 (30 and 60 pmol) levels were determined by qRT-PCR using RNA isolated from SW480 cells, normalized to small nucleolar RNA RNU6B, and compared with endogenous miR-137 expression levels. (B) MSH2 mRNA levels in SW480 cells transfected with pre-miR-137 and anti-miR-137 by qRT-PCR, normalized against actin used as internal control. (C) MSH2 protein levels in SW480 cells transfected with pre-miR-137 and anti-miR-137 by Western blotting with densitometric analysis of MSH2 protein and mRNA expression, normalized to actin, compared to each FAM negative control and endogenous MSH2 expression. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test with * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2. Transfection of pre-miR-137 and anti-miR-137 reagents into SW480 cells. (A) Transfected pre-miR-137 (15 and 30 pmol) and anti-miR-137 (30 and 60 pmol) levels were determined by qRT-PCR using RNA isolated from SW480 cells, normalized to small nucleolar RNA RNU6B, and compared with endogenous miR-137 expression levels. (B) MSH2 mRNA levels in SW480 cells transfected with pre-miR-137 and anti-miR-137 by qRT-PCR, normalized against actin used as internal control. (C) MSH2 protein levels in SW480 cells transfected with pre-miR-137 and anti-miR-137 by Western blotting with densitometric analysis of MSH2 protein and mRNA expression, normalized to actin, compared to each FAM negative control and endogenous MSH2 expression. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test with * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.0001.
Cancers 13 04662 g002
Cancers 13 04662 g003 550
Figure 3. Relative pre-miR-137 and MSH2 mRNA expression in normal (N) and tumor (T) colon tissue from a patient carrying the c*226>G variant in the MSH2 3′UTR. Pre-miR-137 levels were determined by qRT-PCR and normalized to small nucleolar RNA RNU6B. MSH2 mRNA levels were normalized to GAPDH. All data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 4 independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test with a ** p < 0.0001.
Figure 3. Relative pre-miR-137 and MSH2 mRNA expression in normal (N) and tumor (T) colon tissue from a patient carrying the c*226>G variant in the MSH2 3′UTR. Pre-miR-137 levels were determined by qRT-PCR and normalized to small nucleolar RNA RNU6B. MSH2 mRNA levels were normalized to GAPDH. All data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 4 independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test with a ** p < 0.0001.
Cancers 13 04662 g003
Cancers 13 04662 g004 550
Figure 4. A 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays was used to determine cell viability in SW480 cells transfected with 15 (A) and 30 (B) pmol pre-miR-137 and pre-miR SCR (negative control), from 24–120 h. MiR-137 overexpression significantly suppressed SW480 proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner (** p < 0.0001).
Figure 4. A 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays was used to determine cell viability in SW480 cells transfected with 15 (A) and 30 (B) pmol pre-miR-137 and pre-miR SCR (negative control), from 24–120 h. MiR-137 overexpression significantly suppressed SW480 proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner (** p < 0.0001).
Cancers 13 04662 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liccardo, R.; Sessa, R.; Trombetti, S.; De Rosa, M.; Izzo, P.; Grosso, M.; Duraturo, F. MiR-137 Targets the 3′ Untranslated Region of MSH2: Potential Implications in Lynch Syndrome-Related Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 4662. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184662

AMA Style

Liccardo R, Sessa R, Trombetti S, De Rosa M, Izzo P, Grosso M, Duraturo F. MiR-137 Targets the 3′ Untranslated Region of MSH2: Potential Implications in Lynch Syndrome-Related Colorectal Cancer. Cancers. 2021; 13(18):4662. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liccardo, Raffaella, Raffaele Sessa, Silvia Trombetti, Marina De Rosa, Paola Izzo, Michela Grosso, and Francesca Duraturo. 2021. "MiR-137 Targets the 3′ Untranslated Region of MSH2: Potential Implications in Lynch Syndrome-Related Colorectal Cancer" Cancers 13, no. 18: 4662. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184662

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop