Next Article in Journal
One-Carbon Metabolism Associated Vulnerabilities in Glioblastoma: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
FOXM1: A Multifunctional Oncoprotein and Emerging Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/cancers13123059
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Understanding the Clinical Impact of MUC5AC Expression on Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

by
Ashish Manne
1,*,
Ashwini Esnakula
2,
Laith Abushahin
1 and
Allan Tsung
3
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
2
Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
3
Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2021, 13(12), 3059; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123059
Submission received: 24 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 17 June 2021 / Published: 19 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biomarkers)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Management of pancreatic cancer is challenging as there are limited treatment options, and most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages. In addition, there are no dependable tests available to predict bad outcomes or treatment responses in current clinical practice. Here, we shed light on the available evidence on mucin, MUC5AC in predicting the outcome of pancreatic cancers. We also discuss variants of MUC5AC believed to have a role in the malignant transformation of pancreatic tissues.

Abstract

Mucin-5AC (MUC5AC) is a heavily glycosylated gel-forming secreted mucin with a reliable prognostic value when detected in multiple malignancies. It is highly prevalent (70%) in PDA and is nonexistent in normal pancreatic tissues. Retrospective studies on PDA tumor tissue (detected by immunohistochemistry or IHC)) have investigated the prognostic value of MUC5AC expression but were equivocal. Some studies associated it with poor outcomes (survival or pathological features such as lymph node disease, vascular/neural invasion in resected tumors), while others have concluded that it is a good prognostic marker. The examination of expression level threshold (5%, 10%, or 25%) and the detected region (apical vs. cytoplasmic) were variable among the studies. The maturation stage and glycoform of MUC5AC detected also differed with the Monoclonal antibody (Mab) employed for IHC. CLH2 detects less mature/less glycosylated versions while 45M1 or 21-1 detect mature/more glycosylated forms. Interestingly, aberrantly glycosylated variants of MUC5AC were detected using lectin assays (Wheat Germ Agglutinin-MUC5AC), and Mabs such as NPC-1C and PAM4 have are more specific to malignant pancreatic tissues. NPC-1C and PAM4 antibody reactive epitopes on MUC5AC are immunogenic and could represent specific changes on the native MUC5AC glycoprotein linked to carcinogenesis. It was never studied to predict treatment response.

1. Introduction

Cancer of the exocrine pancreas is a highly lethal malignancy. It is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States and second only to colorectal cancer as a cause of digestive cancer-related death [1]. According to recent SEER data, the five-year survival rate is only 10% for all stages and a disappointing 40% for even early stage tumors [2]. The lack of prognostic biomarkers with reliable predictive value has handicapped the effective management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).
Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is a blood-based molecular biomarker frequently used to monitor the treatment response in PDA. However, it has some concerning limitations. CA 19-9 is falsely elevated in benign diseases such as acute cholangitis, cirrhosis, and cholestatic diseases [3]. Alternatively, it is not elevated in patients (approximately 5–10%) without a Lewis antigen [4,5]. Histologic characteristics from resected PDA also provide prognostic value such as size of the primary lesion, histologic grade, neurovascular invasion, the presence of tumor necrosis, depth of the portal vein wall invasion, and margins of resection [6,7,8,9]. Unfortunately, there are no routinely used tissue-based predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Currently in the clinical setting, periodic imaging and serum CA 19-9 are used to monitor response to treatments [10]. Thus, there has been considerable enthusiasm to identify ideal tissue and blood biomarkers in PDA in the last two decades, including mucins, osteopontin, cell-free DNA, stromal markers (hyaluronidase), and epigenetic markers [11]. In this review, we will focus on mucin expression in tissues of PDA and the studies that looked at the impact on the outcome and the studies that described variants of MUC5AC.

2. Mucins in PDA

Mucins (MUC proteins) are high-molecular glycoproteins with N-acetyl galactosamine (oligosaccharides) sidechains linked by O-glycosidic linkage to specific amino acid residues that occur in repetitive short stretches (tandem repeats) in the backbone [12]. They form a layer on normal respiratory and digestive tracts and guard the underlying epithelial tissues against inflammation, infection, acid (in GI tract), and other physiological insults [13].
Mucins are vital constituents of pancreatic tissues, and their expression patterns (Table 1) can indicate the underlying aberrations in pancreatic tissue. For example, normal pancreatic tissues do not express MUC4 or MUC5AC. However, MUC1, MUC3, and MUC6 are expressed in all kinds of pancreatic tissues from normal to cancerous. In addition, MUC2 expression is weak in normal pancreatic tissues and is not associated with pre-cancerous lesions such as pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), while MUC4 is not detected in benign pancreatic diseases and its expression is very low in pre-malignant and malignant pancreatic tissues [14,15,16,17]. In normal pancreatic tissues, transmembrane mucins such as MUC1 regulate the proliferation and differentiation of epithelial cells and suppress malignant transformation [18]. Studies have linked aberrant expression of mucins with uncontrolled cell proliferation, distant metastasis, macrovascular invasion, and chemoresistance [15,19,20,21,22].
Among all the investigated mucins in pancreatic tissues, MUC5AC stands unique, as its mere detection in pancreatic tissues is abnormal and is expressed in high levels in cancerous and pre-cancerous lesions. Correlative studies in the literature show its association with poor prognosis in certain cancers (uterine, ampullary cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma) and undesirable mutations such as KRAS in lung cancer [23,24,25,26]. The impact of MUC5AC expression in PDA on patient outcomes, especially survival and treatment response, is currently unknown. This review aims to understand the current evidence on the clinical significance of MUC5AC expression in PDA-tumor tissues and evaluate its use as a potential molecular biomarker (specifically as predictive, prognostic, monitoring, and response).

3. PDA and MUC5AC Expression

MUC5AC is gel-forming mucin expressed in the normal tissues (native or normal MUC5AC) from the stomach (gastric pits), gallbladder, conjunctiva, middle ear, nasopharynx, and bronchial tract, and protects their epithelial surfaces from various insults [27,28,29,30]. De novo expression of native MUC5AC in pancreatic tissues occurs in abnormal tissues ranging from benign diseases (pancreatitis) to precursor lesions (PanIN) to mucinous neoplasms and invasive adenocarcinomas; it is well-established in the literature and is attributed to considerable alterations at the gene expression level [15,31,32,33,34]. Its expression along with KRAS is common in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), but there is no clear correlation with its malignant transformation [35]. MUC5AC expression (IHC) is observed in all kinds of IPMN (intestinal and gastric) and helps to distinguish it from serous cystadenoma [36,37]. When used along with CA 19-9, serum MUC5AC is useful in that it helps differentiate PDA from other benign conditions like chronic pancreatitis [38,39]. When MUC5AC is added to CA 19-9, specificity improves from 43% to 83% and sensitivity from 79% to 83% in differentiating cancers from chronic pancreatitis/normal. It can be detected (mRNA expression) in the pancreatic tumor aspiration fluid (along with MUC1) of high-grade PanIN and PDA [40]. In IPMN management, MUC5AC detection in the extracellular vesicles can be a reliable biomarker to predict invasiveness and determine the need for surgery, as demonstrated by Yang et al. [41]. Among the IPMN patients, MUC5AC in the extracellular vesicles help in identifying invasive IPMN from low-grade IMPN with a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 96%.
The MUC5AC gene is located within a single 400 kb genomic DNA segment on chromosome 11 in the subtelomeric locus 11p15.5 [42]. On this locus, MUC5AC is clustered with four other mucin genes in a sequence MUC6-MUC2-MUC5AC-MUC5B from telomere to the centromere [43]. MUC5AC plays a role by influencing various critical pathways implicated in the malignant transformation and tumor progression in PDA, and the effects are pathway-specific. It accelerates distant metastasis by (a) enhancing the expression of integrins (α3 and β3), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) -3, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -A; (b) activating extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1)pathways; (c) enabling disruption of E-cadherin/β-catenin axis by Kru¨ppel-like zinc-finger protein GLI1 [44,45]. It protects the neoplastic tissue from host immune responses by inhibiting TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induced apoptosis and decreasing the production of chemokines (CXCL8) [46,47]. It provides resistance from chemotherapeutic agents such αas gemcitabine by promoting E-cadherin/β-catenin axis activation [48]. We summarized the major pathophysiological mechanisms influenced by MUC5AC and the resultant effects in a pancreatic tissue that promote tumor progression and distant metastasis in Figure 1.
Factors instrumental in regulating MUC5AC expression in pancreatic tissues and promoting hyperplasia or dysplasia are not clear. Forskolin is a root extract from Coleus forskohlii that promotes Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate, or Cyclic AMP (cAMP) by activating the adenyl cyclase enzyme [49]. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) -1 receptors are consistently found on pancreatic tumor cells [50]. In vitro studies showed that Forskolin and VIP stimulate the expression and release of MUC5AC antigen in pancreatic cells [51]. Transcription factors such as GL-1 (as explained above), Specificity protein factor -1 (SP-1), and Activator protein factor -1 (AP-1) promote the transcription of MUC5AC genes [45,52]. Mutated GNAS (a gene encoding G protein stimulating α subunit) in IPMN upregulates expression of MUC5AC via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways [53]. The factors and mechanisms regulating MUC5AC expression in the lung or nasal epithelial were not included in this paper. There is preclinical evidence that MUC5AC has a role in increasing the cell viability, invasiveness, angiogenesis and distant metastasis. However, more studies are needed to prove its clinical utility [54].

4. The Impact of MUC5AC Expression on Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes in Clinical Studies

The role of MUC5AC as a useful biomarker with predictive or prognostic value is not well understood. A comprehensive summary of studies that involved immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of MUC5AC in pancreatic cancer is illustrated in Table 2 [55,56,57,58,59].
Out of 5 studies listed in Table 2, IHC was performed on tissue microarrays, fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples, and resected tissues. In resected specimens, when the threshold is high (25%), the outcomes are poor, consistent with the data on ampullary cancers [23]. In studies where the study population included resected tumors, locally advanced and metastatic patients, the results were inconclusive [55]. MUC5AC function varies based on histology and differentiation of the tumors. In the study done by Higashi et al., MUC5AC had prognostic value only in advanced-stage cancers (Stage III/IV) but was associated with better outcomes. It should be pointed out that the threshold used in this study was just 10%.
Results of our prior tissue-based IHC study were also inconclusive [60]. We attempted to study the expression pattern of native MUC5AC in PDA from 45 patients (25 patients with resectable tumor and 20 patients with metastatic tumor) using CHL2 Mab. Cytoplasmic and apical MUC5AC expression was identified in 82% and 80% of PDA, respectively. In our cohort, apical MUC5AC expression was different between metastatic and non-metastatic patients and showed prognostic significance in non-metastatic patients (better survival in MUC5AC-positive PDA). On the other hand, cytoplasmic MUC5AC expression had no prognostic value. In patients with resectable PDA, MUC5AC expression (apical) detection correlated with better overall survival.
While there appears to be no conclusive evidence that tissue-based MUC5AC IHC detection is reliable, Yonezawa et al. studied MUC5AC gene expression (mRNA using in situ hybridization) in intrapapillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and PDAs [61]. Among PDAs, only 13% expressed MUC5AC and all were in advanced stage tumors (III or IV). There was a correlation between MUC5AC expression and histological subtype (along with MUC2). Papillary structures in cancer tissues of main ducts, interlobular or intralobular ducts and mucinous neoplasms were MUC5AC positive, while tubular and/or poorly differentiated structures were MUC5AC negative. However, MUC5AC mRNA expression in PDA did not make a difference in survival.
While investigating the reasons for discordant results on MUC5AC expression by IHC on PDA prognosis, there has been a focus on the Mabs used. All the studies listed in Table 2 utilized CHL2 Mab that recognizes the sequence TTSTTSAP within the tandem repeats (backbone) of MUC5AC glycoprotein [62,63]. This antibody also detects native MUC5AC constitutively expressed in normal tissues of the lungs and gastrointestinal tract. Other commonly used Mabs, 45-M1 and 2-11M1, also detect native MUC5AC, but the 45M1 Mab recognizes cysteine-rich subdomains of class-2 (Cys2 and Cys4) in the N-terminal domains, and 21M1 Mab reacts with the C-terminal region of MUC5AC [34,64]. These Mabs engage with different epitopes and help identify different variants of native MUC5AC [51,65,66,67]. While CLH2 Mab reacts to immature and less glycosylated mucins primarily concentrated in the perinuclear region, the 45M1 and 21M1 Mabs recognize mature and fully glycosylated forms of MUC5AC concentrated in the cytoplasm or extracellularly (secreted). The prognostic values of either 45M1 or 21M1 have not been studied in PDA or compared with CLH2 Mab.

5. Glycosylation of MUC5AC and Pancreatic Cancer

As studies continue to identify changes in MUC5AC that may be associated with malignant transformation of pancreatic tissues, there is now available evidence on variants of MUC5AC secondary to glycosylation. Glycosylation refers to the addition of a carbohydrate-based molecule (glycan) to a protein [68]. Glycosylation of mucins and their role in pancreatic cancer is well-documented in the available literature [34,69,70]. Depending on the site and the number of glycans involved, multiple isoforms (glycoforms or glycan variants) can be produced from a single mucin. Glycan variants of MUC5AC such as Sialyl-Lewisa (SLea), Sialyl-Lewisx (SLex), STn, and Thomsen-Friedenreich (T) (STn/T/SLea/SLex-MUC5AC) have been associated with mucinous adenocarcinomas from the stomach, ampulla of Vater, colon, lung, breast & ovary [71].
In pancreatic cell lines, pro-inflammatory stimuli such as oxidative stress and treatment with the cytokines interferon (IFN) gamma, interleukin IL-1alpha, and TNF-α can induce changes in glycosylation of MUC5AC (along with MUC1 and MUC16) that promote carcinogenesis [69]. Pan et al. reported increased aberrant N-glycosylation levels (using quantitative glycoproteomics) in pancreatic cancers compared to normal tissues or chronic pancreatitis [70]. Native MUC5AC seems to be an early ‘event’ in pre-cancerous pancreatic tissues (such as PanIN), whereas glycosylation with Sialyl-Tn (STn) glycan (non-specific to MUC5AC) is essential to initiate the malignant transformation [34]. Similarly, Yue et al. reported commonly increased glycan alterations in the sera of pancreatic cancer patients such as Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen, fucose, and Lewis antigens [72].

6. Wheat Germ Agglutinin-MUC5AC Variant

Haab et al. explored detecting cancer-specific glycan variants of mucins like MUC1, MUC5AC, and MUC16 using the antibody-lectin sandwich microarray method in pancreatic cystic fluid samples [73]. They hoped to identify the biomarker that would differentiate mucin-producing cystic tumors from benign cystic lesions. The MUC5AC variant detected using lectin, Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA) (WGA-MUC5AC), was found to be useful with a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 80%. In this study, other glycan variants of MUC5AC and the variants of other mucins could not distinguish a malignant pancreatic lesion from a benign one. Correlative studies are needed to determine the impact of WGA-MUC5AC on PDA outcomes.

7. Niemann Pick C1 (NPC1) Antibody Reactive MUC5AC Variant

In 1970, Hollinshead et al. examined colon/rectal cancer patients exposed to soluble fractions of their autologous tumor cell and normal cell membranes (by dermal injection) [74]. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction was observed in 90% (17/19) of subjects with tumor cell membrane extracts. Normal tumor cell extracts did not elicit a reaction in any of them (0/19). The test was positive (>5 mm within 48 h) in 90% (17/19) of the subjects injected with tumor membranes and negative in all the subjects for normal cell membrane extracts (100%). The antigens responsible for the reaction were assumed to be present only in tumor cell membranes but not in normal cells and were distinct to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). This study paved the way for a phase I vaccine trial in 1984, where 22 colon cancer patients received a vaccine with tumor-associated antigen (TAA), prepared from human colon carcinoma cells (surgical specimens) from 70 different donors [75]. The monoclonal antibodies elicited with TAA, also known as NPC1, were used to test vaccines in other cancers like melanoma, but the results were disappointing [76]. Importantly, the target for the NPC-1 (TAA) was later identified as an aberrantly glycosylated MUC5AC variant (cancer-specific MUC5AC) that is different from native MUC5AC [77,78].
Two main studies have used recombinant chimeric NPC1 antibodies prepared in Chinese hamster ovary cells (NPC-1C) to identify cancer-specific MUC5AC. In the first study by Luka et al., the exclusivity of cancer-specific MUC5AC to colon and pancreatic cancers was confirmed in tumor cell lines, tumor, normal tissues, and in the serum of cancer patients. In the first step, supernatant fluid from various cancer cell lines (pancreas, colon, lung, squamous cell carcinoma) was admixed with NPC-1C Mab in a competitive ELISA assay (using MUC5AC antigen-coated microtiter plates). The authors hypothesized that cancer-specific MUC5AC from the tumor cell lines in the supernatant fluid competes with NPC-1C Mab. However, such inhibition was observed only with pancreatic and colon tumor cell lines and was not seen with lung cancer cell lines (which express native MUC5AC) or squamous cell lines. Next, they used NPC1C Mab to stain the tumor tissues from the colon, pancreas, lung, and normal tissues from the colon and pancreas. As expected, tumor tissues from the colon and pancreas expressed tumor-specific MUC5AC while the normal colon/pancreas and lung cancer tissues did not. Interestingly, lung cancer tissues stained with 45M1 Mab reacts to native MUC5AC but not to NPC-1C Mab. Authors report 79% (30/38) of tumor tissues stained positive. Serum cancer-specific MUC5AC (NPC-1C antigen) detection by sandwich ELISA colon and pancreatic cancer patients also has reasonable sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing cancer from controls [77]. Approximately 80% of cancer patients had higher levels of NPC-1C-reactive MUC5AC. However, serial antigen testing did not give valuable information on monitoring the response after initiating treatment. Interestingly, the serum NPC1C antigen’s average was not different between colon and pancreatic cancer patients.
In the second study by Patel et al., NPC-1C Mab’s binding capacity to tumor cell lines (pancreas and colon) was investigated by flow cytometry. They also investigated the immunohistochemical expression using NPC-1C Mab in colonic and pancreatic tissues (malignant and non-malignant). Around 53% of cells in a pancreatic cancer cell stained for NPC-1C by flow cytometry, and 48% (52/108) of pancreatic tissues stained positive with NPC-1C Mab by IHC. Similarly, 43% of colon cancer tissues were positive for NPC-1C by immunohistochemistry, while normal colon tissues were negative for NPC-1C. The in vivo anti-tumor activity of NPC-1C against pancreatic cancer was shown in a mouse model.
Notable takeaways from these two studies on NPC-1C-reactive in the context of PDA are: (a) it is expressed exclusively in pancreatic and colon cancer tissues; (b) it is different from native MUC5AC expressed in lung cancers and normal tissues identified by 45M1; (c) it is detected in the serum of pancreatic cancer patients; (d) it is immunogenic.

8. PAM4 Antibody Reactive MUC5AC Variant

In 1983, Gold et al. attempted to identify human pancreatic tissue-specific biomarkers in a study using mice, rabbits, and human tissues [79]. Pancreatic ductal mucin (PDM) was isolated from normal pancreatic tissues of autopsy specimens, and anti-PDM anti-sera was prepared by immunizing rabbits with PDM. Mucin-producing organs, including the pancreas, esophagus, stomach, lung, ovary, and breast, were stained using rabbit anti-PDM sera. The only two organ tissues that were positive with the antibody (after absorption by mucinous ovarian cystadenocarcinoma fluid) were the pancreas and goblet cells of the colon. Pancreas-specific determinants isolated from serum’s immunoelectrophoretic pattern (by separating the colonic mucin-specific determinants) were similar to those elicited after transplanting the pancreatic cancer xenografts in athymic nude mice.
This study led to the development of PAM4 antibody (Clivatuzumab tetraxetan), an immunoglobulin produced by immunization of mice with mucin purified from the xenografted RIP I human pancreatic carcinoma [80]. PAM4 antibody stained (via IHC) malignant tissues from pancreatic (85%), colon (50%), lung (5%), and stomach (20%) [80]. The normal tissues from the pancreas, lung, ovary, and spleen did not have reactivity to PAM4. The target for PAM4 antibody (PAM4-antigen) was later identified on MUC5AC, precisely e-fragment (AA1575-2052) comprising Cys2-3-4 on N-terminus and was different from the epitopes of commonly used anti-MUC5AC antibodies CLH2, 45-M1, and 2-11M1 Mabss [64,81]. In the pancreatic cancers, expression of PAM4 differed with the grade of differentiation of tumors (pronounced in well and moderately differentiated tissues and was absent in most poorly differentiated cancers) [80].
PAM-based serum enzyme immunoassays were also developed with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 95% in detecting PDA with a false-positive rate of 5% [82]. The test’s sensitivity and the antigen levels were higher in advanced cancers (Stage 3 or 4) compared to early stages (Stage 1 or 2). Even though 38% of chronic pancreatitis patients were positive, their corresponding tissues were negative for antibody (on IHC). The sensitivity dropped to 76% with PAM 4 assays in more extensive studies, but when combined with CA 19-9, the sensitivity improved back up to 84% [83].
The evidence available on MUC5AC reactive to NPC-1C and PAM4 antibody suggests that both the Mabs stain or react to a specific epitope (on MUC5AC) that is (a) not expressed in normal pancreatic tissues; (b) detected in most malignant pancreatic and colon tissues; (c) different from the targets of anti-MUC5AC monoclonal antibodies such as CLH2, 45-M1, and 2-11M used to detect native MUC5AC; and d) detected in the serum of pancreatic cancer patients (summarized in Table 3). NPC-1C and PAM4 antigen epitopes thus appear to represent specific changes on the native MUC5AC glycoprotein linked to a particular step in carcinogenesis. As with CLH2, neither of these Mabs were tested in non-malignant abnormal pancreatic tissues such as pancreatitis, hyperplasia, or PanIN. Further studies are needed to determine if they have better prognostic/predictive value compared to CLH2 Mab.

9. Future Directions with MUC5AC

We need more studies focusing on the mechanism that explains the de novo synthesis of mucins such as MUC5AC in pancreatic tissues that is constitutively expressed in other normal organs. In a current clinical practice where comprehensive genomic profiling is routine, IHC may be an outdated test. MUC5AC gene expression (mRNA) studies may give us more reliable data to do correlative studies in PDA. For IHC, investigating the expression patterns of MUC5AC detected by various Mabs (CLH1, 45M1, 21M1, NPC-1C, and PAM4) in PDA, associating it with the outcomes, and stratifying the data based on the stage of diagnosis, histology, differentiation, and thresholds for cut-offs might give us a better picture of its significance. In addition, examining the influence of MUC5AC on a patient’s response to therapeutic agents (gemcitabine-based vs. 5FU-based therapy) may help us choose appropriate systemic therapy.
Compared to pancreatic tissues, MUC5AC in lung and gastric tissues was studied extensively [84,85,86]. In the airways, its production is intricately related to Acinetobacter baumannii, and in the gastric lining, it helps H pylori colonialization, a known risk factor for gastric cancer [87,88]. It is worth investigating the influence of MUC5AC on the pancreas’s microenvironment and vice versa, and the impact of such influence on carcinogenesis.NPC-1C and PAM4 Mabs failed to have a meaningful impact in treating pancreatic and colon cancers [89,90,91,92,93,94,95]. There is preliminary evidence that MUC5AC is immunogenic, and the cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are stimulated by it (peptides such as MUC5AC-A02-1398 [FLNDAGACV] and MUC5AC-A24-716 [TCQPTCRSL]) can kill the pancreatic tumor cells and have the potential to be harnessed for vaccine development [32]. MUC5AC expression in serum, pancreatic juice, and cyst fluid might help screen high-risk individuals for PDA, like young type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and patients with chronic pancreatitis.

10. Conclusions

There is a critical need to identify reliable biomarkers in the management of PDA. As of now, there is no valid clinical use for MUC5AC detected by IHC in PDA tissues in clinical practice. More clinical and pre-clinical studies are required to understand the impact of MUC5AC on the outcomes of pancreatic cancers. Specifically, the relevance of predicting outcomes based on expression patterns of MUC5AC detected by various Mabs (CLH1, 45M1, 21M1, NPC-1C, and PAM4) in PDA is unknown. Examining the influence of MUC5AC on patient response to therapeutic agents may aid in selecting systemic therapies in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.E., L.A. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Available online: http://www.seer.cancer.gov/ (accessed on 19 June 2021).
  3. Tsen, A.; Barbara, M.; Rosenkranz, L. Dilemma of elevated CA 19-9 in biliary pathology. Pancreatology 2018, 18, 862–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tempero, M.A.; Uchida, E.; Takasaki, H.; Burnett, D.A.; Steplewski, Z.; Pour, P.M. Relationship of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and Lewis antigens in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 5501–5503. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, C.; Deng, S.; Jin, K.; Gong, Y.; Cheng, H.; Fan, Z.; Qian, Y.; Huang, Q.; Ni, Q.; Luo, G.; et al. Lewis antigen-negative pancreatic cancer: An aggressive subgroup. Int. J. Oncol. 2020, 56, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Mitsunaga, S.; Hasebe, T.; Iwasaki, M.; Kinoshita, T.; Ochiai, A.; Shimizu, N. Important prognostic histological parameters for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer Sci. 2005, 96, 858–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meyer, W.; Jurowich, C.; Reichel, M.; Steinhäuser, B.; Wünsch, P.H.; Gebhardt, C. Pathomorphological and histological prognostic factors in curatively resected ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Surg. Today 2000, 30, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Campbell, F.; Smith, R.A.; Whelan, P.; Sutton, R.; Raraty, M.; Neoptolemos, J.P.; Ghaneh, P. Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: The prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin. Histopathology 2009, 55, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fukuda, S. Significance of the Depth of Portal Vein Wall Invasion After Curative Resection for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Arch. Surg. 2007, 142, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bauer, T.M.; El-Rayes, B.F.; Li, X.; Hammad, N.; Philip, P.A.; Shields, A.F.; Zalupski, M.M.; Bekaii-Saab, T. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who receive gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy: A pooled analysis of 6 prospective trials. Cancer 2013, 119, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hasan, S.; Jacob, R.; Manne, U.; Paluri, R. Advances in pancreatic cancer biomarkers. Oncol. Rev. 2019, 13, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bansil, R.; Turner, B.S. Mucin structure, aggregation, physiological functions and biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 11, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kebouchi, M.; Hafeez, Z.; Le Roux, Y.; Dary-Mourot, A.; Genay, M. Importance of digestive mucus and mucins for designing new functional food ingredients. Food Res. Int. 2020, 131, 108906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kaur, S.; Kumar, S.; Momi, N.; Sasson, A.R.; Batra, S.K. Mucins in pancreatic cancer and its microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Nagata, K.; Horinouchi, M.; Saitou, M.; Higashi, M.; Nomoto, M.; Goto, M.; Yonezawa, S. Mucin expression profile in pancreatic cancer and the precursor lesions. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2007, 14, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Balague, C.; Audie, J.P.; Porchet, N.; Real, F.X. In situ hybridization shows distinct patterns of mucin gene expression in normal, benign, and malignant pancreas tissues. Gastroenterology 1995, 109, 953–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Balagué, C.; Gambús, G.; Carrato, C.; Porchet, N.; Aubert, J.P.; Kim, Y.S.; Real, F.X. Altered expression of MUC2, MUC4, and MUC5 mucin genes in pancreas tissues and cancer cell lines. Gastroenterology 1994, 106, 1054–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meerzaman, D.; Shapiro, P.S.; Kim, K.C. Involvement of the MAP kinase ERK2 in MUC1 mucin signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2001, 281, L86–L91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rachagani, S.; Torres, M.P.; Kumar, S.; Haridas, D.; Baine, M.; Macha, M.A.; Kaur, S.; Ponnusamy, M.P.; Dey, P.; Seshacharyulu, P.; et al. Mucin (Muc) expression during pancreatic cancer progression in spontaneous mouse model: Potential implications for diagnosis and therapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2012, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Jonckheere, N.; Skrypek, N.; van Seuningen, I. Mucins and Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers 2010, 2, 1794–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mimeault, M.; Johansson, S.L.; Senapati, S.; Momi, N.; Chakraborty, S.; Batra, S.K. MUC4 down-regulation reverses chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer stem/progenitor cells and their progenies. Cancer Lett. 2010, 295, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hu, Y.P.; Haq, B.; Carraway, K.L.; Savaraj, N.; Lampidis, T.J. Multidrug resistance correlates with overexpression of Muc4 but inversely with P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance related protein in transfected human melanoma cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003, 65, 1419–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xue, Y.; Reid, M.D.; Balci, S.; Quigley, B.; Muraki, T.; Memis, B.; Xia, J.; Hacihasanoglu, E.; Bedolla, G.; Pehlivanoglu, B.; et al. Immunohistochemical Classification of Ampullary Carcinomas: Critical Reappraisal Fails to Confirm Prognostic Relevance for Recently Proposed Panels, and Highlights MUC5AC as a Strong Prognosticator. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 41, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mitsuhashi, A.; Yamazawa, K.; Nagai, Y.; Tanaka, N.; Matsui, H.; Sekiya, S. Correlation between MUC5AC expression and the prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2004, 11, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boonla, C.; Wongkham, S.; Sheehan, J.K.; Wongkham, C.; Bhudhisawasdi, V.; Tepsiri, N.; Pairojkul, C. Prognostic value of serum MUC5AC mucin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 2003, 98, 1438–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bauer, A.K.; Umer, M.; Richardson, V.L.; Cumpian, A.M.; Harder, A.Q.; Khosravi, N.; Azzegagh, Z.; Hara, N.M.; Ehre, C.; Mohebnasab, M.; et al. Requirement for MUC5AC in KRAS-dependent lung carcinogenesis. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e120941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hoorens, P.R.; Rinaldi, M.; Li, R.W.; Goddeeris, B.; Claerebout, E.; Vercruysse, J.; Geldhof, P. Genome wide analysis of the bovine mucin genes and their gastrointestinal transcription profile. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Rose, M.C.; Voynow, J.A. Respiratory Tract Mucin Genes and Mucin Glycoproteins in Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86, 245–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. De Bolós, C.; Garrido, M.; Real, F.X. MUC6 apomucin shows a distinct normal tissue distribution that correlates with Lewis antigen expression in the human stomach. Gastroenterology 1995, 109, 723–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. López-Ferrer, A.; de Bolós, C.; Barranco, C.; Garrido, M.; Isern, J.; Carlstedt, I.; Reis, C.A.; Torrado, J.; Real, F.X. Role of fucosyltransferases in the association between apomucin and Lewis antigen expression in normal and malignant gastric epithelium. Gut 2000, 47, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Yamasaki, H.; Ikeda, S.; Okajima, M.; Miura, Y.; Asahara, T.; Kohno, N.; Shimamoto, F. Expression and localization of MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC and small intestinal mucin antigen in pancreatic tumors. Int. J. Oncol. 2004, 24, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yamazoe, S.; Tanaka, H.; Iwauchi, T.; Yoshii, M.; Ito, G.; Amano, R.; Yamada, N.; Sawada, T.; Ohira, M.; Hirakawa, K. Identification of HLA-A*0201- and A*2402-restricted epitopes of mucin 5AC expressed in advanced pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2011, 40, 896–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matsuyama, M.; Kondo, F.; Ishihara, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Ito, R.; Tsuyuguchi, T.; Tawada, K.; Yokosuka, O. Evaluation of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and mucin expression in normal pancreata. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2012, 19, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, G.E.; Bae, H.I.; Park, H.U.; Kuan, S.F.; Crawley, S.C.; Ho, J.J.; Kim, Y.S. Aberrant expression of MUC5AC and MUC6 gastric mucins and sialyl Tn antigen in intraepithelial neoplasms of the pancreas. Gastroenterology 2002, 123, 1052–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nissim, S.; Idos, G.E.; Wu, B. Genetic markers of malignant transformation in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: A meta-analysis. Pancreas 2012, 41, 1195–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Handra-Luca, A.; Flejou, J.-F.; Rufat, P.; Corcos, O.; Belghiti, J.; Ruszniewski, P.; Degott, C.; Bedossa, P.; Couvelard, A. Human pancreatic mucinous cystadenoma is characterized by distinct mucin, cytokeratin and CD10 expression compared with intraductal papillary-mucinous adenoma. Histopathology 2006, 48, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ban, S.; Naitoh, Y.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Sakurai, T.; Kuroda, M.; Koyama, I.; Lauwers, G.Y.; Shimizu, M. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas: Its histopathologic difference between 2 major types. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2006, 30, 1561–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaur, S.; Smith, L.M.; Patel, A.; Menning, M.; Watley, D.C.; Malik, S.S.; Krishn, S.R.; Mallya, K.; Aithal, A.; Sasson, A.R.; et al. A Combination of MUC5AC and CA19-9 Improves the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 112, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yue, T.; Maupin, K.A.; Fallon, B.; Li, L.; Partyka, K.; Anderson, M.A.; Brenner, D.E.; Kaul, K.; Zeh, H.; Moser, A.J.; et al. Enhanced discrimination of malignant from benign pancreatic disease by measuring the CA 19-9 antigen on specific protein carriers. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e29180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ohuchida, K.; Mizumoto, K.; Yamada, D.; Fujii, K.; Ishikawa, N.; Konomi, H.; Nagai, E.; Yamaguchi, K.; Tsuneyoshi, M.; Tanaka, M. Quantitative analysis of MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA in pancreatic juice for preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 118, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, K.S.; Ciprani, D.; O’Shea, A.; Liss, A.S.; Yang, R.; Fletcher-Mercaldo, S.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Fernández-Del Castillo, C.; Weissleder, R. Extracellular Vesicle Analysis Allows for Identification of Invasive IPMN. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 1345–1358.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Desseyn, J.-L.; Aubert, J.-P.; Porchet, N.; Laine, A. Evolution of the Large Secreted Gel-Forming Mucins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17, 1175–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Guo, X.; Zheng, S.; Dang, H.; Pace, R.G.; Stonebraker, J.R.; Jones, C.D.; Boellmann, F.; Yuan, G.; Haridass, P.; Fedrigo, O.; et al. Genome Reference and Sequence Variation in the Large Repetitive Central Exon of HumanMUC5AC. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 50, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yamazoe, S.; Tanaka, H.; Sawada, T.; Amano, R.; Yamada, N.; Ohira, M.; Hirakawa, K. RNA interference suppression of mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) reduces the adhesive and invasive capacity of human pancreatic cancer cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Inaguma, S.; Kasai, K.; Ikeda, H. GLI1 facilitates the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells through MUC5AC-mediated attenuation of E-cadherin. Oncogene 2011, 30, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hoshi, H.; Sawada, T.; Uchida, M.; Iijima, H.; Kimura, K.; Hirakawa, K.; Wanibuchi, H. MUC5AC protects pancreatic cancer cells from TRAIL-induced death pathways. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 42, 887–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hoshi, H.; Sawada, T.; Uchida, M.; Saito, H.; Iijima, H.; Toda-Agetsuma, M.; Wada, T.; Yamazoe, S.; Tanaka, H.; Kimura, K.; et al. Tumor-associated MUC5AC stimulates in vivo tumorigenicity of human pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2011, 38, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Ganguly, K.; Krishn, S.R.; Jahan, R.; Atri, P.; Rachagani, S.; Rauth, S.; Xi, H.; Lu, Y.; Batra, S.; Kaur, S. Abstract 65: Gel-forming mucin MUC5AC as the nexus for cell-adhesion molecules governing pancreatic cancer aggressiveness and chemoresistance. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 65. [Google Scholar]
  49. Litosch, I.; Hudson, T.H.; Mills, I.; Li, S.Y.; Fain, J.N. Forskolin as an activator of cyclic AMP accumulation and lipolysis in rat adipocytes. Mol. Pharmacol. 1982, 22, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Jiang, S.; Kopras, E.; McMichael, M.; Bell, R.H., Jr.; Ulrich, C.D., II. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) stimulates in vitro growth of VIP-1 receptor-bearing human pancreatic adenocarcinoma-derived cells. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 1475–1480. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Ho, J.J.; Crawley, S.; Pan, P.L.; Farrelly, E.R.; Kim, Y.S. Secretion of MUC5AC mucin from pancreatic cancer cells in response to forskolin and VIP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 294, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kato, S.; Hokari, R.; Crawley, S.; Gum, J.; Ahn, D.-H.; Kim, J.-W.; Kwon, S.-W.; Miura, S.; Basbaum, C.; Kim, Y. MUC5AC mucin gene regulation in pancreatic cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2006, 29, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Komatsu, H.; Tanji, E.; Sakata, N.; Aoki, T.; Motoi, F.; Naitoh, T.; Katayose, Y.; Egawa, S.; Unno, M.; Furukawa, T. A GNAS mutation found in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms induces drastic alterations of gene expression profiles with upregulation of mucin genes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Krishn, S.R. Secretory Mucin MUC5AC in Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA, 2016; p. 110. [Google Scholar]
  55. Takikita, M.; Altekruse, S.; Lynch, C.F.; Goodman, M.T.; Hernandez, B.Y.; Green, M.; Cozen, W.; Cockburn, M.; Sibug Saber, M.; Topor, M.; et al. Associations between selected biomarkers and prognosis in a population-based pancreatic cancer tissue microarray. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 2950–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Higashi, M.; Yokoyama, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Goto, Y.; Kitazono, I.; Hiraki, T.; Taguchi, H.; Hashimoto, S.; Fukukura, Y.; Koriyama, C.; et al. Mucin expression in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens is a useful prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2015, 44, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Jinfeng, M.; Kimura, W.; Hirai, I.; Sakurai, F.; Moriya, T.; Mizutani, M. Expression of MUC5AC and MUC6 in invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas and relationship with prognosis. Int. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2003, 34, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Takano, Y.; Ohike, N.; Tajiri, T.; Asonuma, K.; Harada, K.; Takahashi, H.; Morohoshi, T. Gastric- and intestinal-type marker expression in invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2012, 11, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Aloysius, M.M.; Zaitoun, A.M.; Awad, S.; Ilyas, M.; Rowlands, B.J.; Lobo, D.N. Mucins and CD56 as markers of tumour invasion and prognosis in periampullary cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2010, 97, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Manne, A.; Mneimneh, W.; Elkadi, O.; Escobar, D.E.; Coley, J.; Guzman, G.B.; Fnu, S.M.d.; Alkharabsheh, O.; Khushman, M.d.M. The pattern of mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) expression using immunohistochemistry and its prognostic significance in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38 (Suppl. 15), e16756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yonezawa, S.; Horinouchi, M.; Osako, M.; Kubo, M.; Takao, S.; Arimura, Y.; Nagata, K.; Tanaka, S.; Sakoda, K.; Aikou, T.; et al. Gene expression of gastric type mucin (MUC5AC) in pancreatic tumors: Its relationship with the biological behavior of the tumor. Pathol. Int. 1999, 49, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Reis, C.A.; David, L.; Carvalho, F.; Mandel, U.; de Bolós, C.; Mirgorodskaya, E.; Clausen, H.; Sobrinho-Simões, M. Immunohistochemical study of the expression of MUC6 mucin and co-expression of other secreted mucins (MUC5AC and MUC2) in human gastric carcinomas. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2000, 48, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Nollet, S.; Forgue-Lafitte, M.E.; Kirkham, P.; Bara, J. Mapping of two new epitopes on the apomucin encoded by MUC5AC gene: Expression in normal GI tract and colon tumors. Int. J. Cancer 2002, 99, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, D.; Chang, C.H.; Gold, D.V.; Goldenberg, D.M. Identification of PAM4 (clivatuzumab)-reactive epitope on MUC5AC: A promising biomarker and therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 4274–4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Lidell, M.E.; Bara, J.; Hansson, G.C. Mapping of the 45M1 epitope to the C-terminal cysteine-rich part of the human MUC5AC mucin. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bara, J.; Chastre, E.; Mahiou, J.; Singh, R.L.; Forgue-Lafitte, M.E.; Hollande, E.; Godeau, F. Gastric M1 mucin, an early oncofetal marker of colon carcinogenesis, is encoded by the MUC5AC gene. Int. J. Cancer 1998, 75, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ho, J.J.L.; Bi, N.; Yan, P.-s.; Yuan, M.; Norton, K.A.; Kim, Y.S. Characterization of New Pancreatic Cancer-Reactive Monoclonal Antibodies Directed against Purified Mucin. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Solá, R.J.; Griebenow, K. Glycosylation of Therapeutic Proteins. BioDrugs 2010, 24, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Wu, Y.M.; Nowack, D.D.; Omenn, G.S.; Haab, B.B. Mucin glycosylation is altered by pro-inflammatory signaling in pancreatic-cancer cells. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 1876–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Pan, S.; Chen, R.; Tamura, Y.; Crispin, D.A.; Lai, L.A.; May, D.H.; McIntosh, M.W.; Goodlett, D.R.; Brentnall, T.A. Quantitative glycoproteomics analysis reveals changes in N-glycosylation level associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 1293–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Pinto, R.; Carvalho, A.S.; Conze, T.; Magalhães, A.; Picco, G.; Burchell, J.M.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Reis, C.A.; Almeida, R.; Mandel, U.; et al. Identification of new cancer biomarkers based on aberrant mucin glycoforms by in situ proximity ligation. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 1474–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yue, T.; Goldstein, I.J.; Hollingsworth, M.A.; Kaul, K.; Brand, R.E.; Haab, B.B. The prevalence and nature of glycan alterations on specific proteins in pancreatic cancer patients revealed using antibody-lectin sandwich arrays. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2009, 8, 1697–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Haab, B.B.; Porter, A.; Yue, T.; Li, L.; Scheiman, J.; Anderson, M.A.; Barnes, D.; Schmidt, C.M.; Feng, Z.; Simeone, D.M. Glycosylation variants of mucins and CEACAMs as candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Ann. Surg. 2010, 251, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Hollinshead, A.; Glew, D.; Bunnag, B.; Gold, P.; Herberman, R. Skin-Reactive Soluble Antigen from Intestinal Cancer-Cell-Membranes and Relationship to Carcinoembryonic Antigens. Lancet 1970, 295, 1191–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hollinshead, A.; Elias, E.G.; Arlen, M.; Buda, B.; Mosley, M.; Scherrer, J. Specific active immunotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon utilizing tumor-associated antigens (TAA). A phase I clinical trial. Cancer 1985, 56, 480–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hollinshead, A.; Arlen, M.; Yonemoto, R.; Cohen, M.; Tanner, K.; Kundin, W.D.; Scherrer, J. Pilot studies using melanoma tumor-associated antigens (TAA) in specific-active immunochemotherapy of malignant melanoma. Cancer 1982, 49, 1387–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Luka, J.; Arlen, P.M.; Bristol, A. Development of a serum biomarker assay that differentiates tumor-associated MUC5AC (NPC-1C ANTIGEN) from normal MUC5AC. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 2011, 934757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Patel, S.P.; Bristol, A.; Saric, O.; Wang, X.-P.; Dubeykovskiy, A.; Arlen, P.M.; Morse, M.A. Anti-tumor activity of a novel monoclonal antibody, NPC-1C, optimized for recognition of tumor antigen MUC5AC variant in preclinical models. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2013, 62, 1011–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gold, D.V.; Hollingsworth, P.; Kremer, T.; Nelson, D. Identification of a human pancreatic duct tissue-specific antigen. Cancer Res. 1983, 43, 235–238. [Google Scholar]
  80. Gold, D.V.; Lew, K.; Maliniak, R.; Hernandez, M.; Cardillo, T. Characterization of monoclonal antibody PAM4 reactive with a pancreatic cancer mucin. Int. J. Cancer 1994, 57, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gold, D.V.; Newsome, G.; Liu, D.; Goldenberg, D.M. Mapping PAM4 (clivatuzumab), a monoclonal antibody in clinical trials for early detection and therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, to MUC5AC mucin. Mol. Cancer 2013, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Gold, D.V.; Goggins, M.; Modrak, D.E.; Newsome, G.; Liu, M.; Shi, C.; Hruban, R.H.; Goldenberg, D.M. Detection of Early-Stage Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2010, 19, 2786–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Gold, D.V.; Gaedcke, J.; Ghadimi, B.M.; Goggins, M.; Hruban, R.H.; Liu, M.; Newsome, G.; Goldenberg, D.M. PAM4 enzyme immunoassay alone and in combination with CA 19-9 for the detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2013, 119, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Zhou, X.; Tu, J.; Li, Q.; Kolosov, V.P.; Perelman, J.M. Hypoxia induces mucin expression and secretion in human bronchial epithelial cells. Transl. Res. 2012, 160, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Takeyama, K.; Jung, B.; Shim, J.J.; Burgel, P.R.; Dao-Pick, T.; Ueki, I.F.; Protin, U.; Kroschel, P.; Nadel, J.A. Activation of epidermal growth factor receptors is responsible for mucin synthesis induced by cigarette smoke. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2001, 280, L165–L172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Shao, M.X.; Nakanaga, T.; Nadel, J.A. Cigarette smoke induces MUC5AC mucin overproduction via tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme in human airway epithelial (NCI-H292) cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2004, 287, L420–L427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lindén, S.; Mahdavi, J.; Hedenbro, J.; Borén, T.; Carlstedt, I. Effects of pH on Helicobacter pylori binding to human gastric mucins: Identification of binding to non-MUC5AC mucins. Biochem. J. 2004, 384, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Yamada, K.; Morinaga, Y.; Yanagihara, K.; Kaku, N.; Harada, Y.; Uno, N.; Nakamura, S.; Imamura, Y.; Hasegawa, H.; Miyazaki, T.; et al. Azithromycin inhibits MUC5AC induction via multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in human airway epithelial cells. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 28, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gold, D.V.; Cardillo, T.; Goldenberg, D.M.; Sharkey, R.M. Localization of pancreatic cancer with radiolabeled monoclonal antibody PAM4. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2001, 39, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mariani, G.; Molea, N.; Bacciardi, D.; Boggi, U.; Fornaciari, G.; Campani, D.; Salvadori, P.A.; Giulianotti, P.C.; Mosca, F.; Gold, D.V.; et al. Initial tumor targeting, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetic evaluation of the monoclonal antibody PAM4 in patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 1995, 55 (Suppl. 23), 5911s–5915s. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Sharkey, R.M.; Karacay, H.; Govindan, S.V.; Goldenberg, D.M. Combination Radioimmunotherapy and Chemoimmunotherapy Involving Different or the Same Targets Improves Therapy of Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Xenograft Models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2011, 10, 1072–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Picozzi, V.J.; Ramanathan, R.K.; Lowery, M.A.; Ocean, A.J.; Mitchel, E.P.; O'Neil, B.H.; Guarino, M.J.; Conkling, P.R.; Cohen, S.J.; Bahary, N.; et al. (90)Y-clivatuzumab tetraxetan with or without low-dose gemcitabine: A phase Ib study in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer after two or more prior therapies. Eur. J. Cancer 2015, 51, 1857–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Gulec, S.A.; Cohen, S.J.; Pennington, K.L.; Zuckier, L.S.; Hauke, R.J.; Horne, H.; Wegener, W.A.; Teoh, N.; Gold, D.V.; Sharkey, R.M.; et al. Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma with 90Y-Clivatuzumab Tetraxetan: A Phase I Single-Dose Escalation Trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 4091–4100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Beg, M.S.; Azad, N.S.; Patel, S.P.; Torrealba, J.; Mavroukakis, S.; Beatson, M.A.; Wang, X.P.; Arlen, P.M.; Morse, M.A. A phase 1 dose-escalation study of NEO-102 in patients with refractory colon and pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2016, 78, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Kim, R.D.; Azad, N.S.; Morse, M.A.; Poplin, E.; Mahipal, A.; Tan, B.; Mavroukakis, S.A.; Fantini, M.; Tsang, K.Y.; Zaki, A.; et al. Phase II Study of Ensituximab, a Novel Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody, in Adults with Unresectable, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 3557–3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cancers 13 03059 g001 550
Figure 1. Pathophysiological mechanisms influenced by MUC5AC in pancreatic tissue. MMP-3—matrix metalloproteinase; VEGF—Vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR—Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; ERK—Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; TRAIL—TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand.
Figure 1. Pathophysiological mechanisms influenced by MUC5AC in pancreatic tissue. MMP-3—matrix metalloproteinase; VEGF—Vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR—Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; ERK—Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; TRAIL—TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand.
Cancers 13 03059 g001
Table
Table 1. Immunohistochemical expression of different mucins in pancreatic tissues [14,15].
Table 1. Immunohistochemical expression of different mucins in pancreatic tissues [14,15].
MucinNormal TissuesPre-CancerousMalignantIPMN/MCNBenign Diseases
MUC1EEEEE
MUC2ENEEEE
MUC3EEEEE
MUC4NEE 1E 1E 1NE
MUC5ACNEEEEE
MUC6EEEEE
1 MUC4—expression is low; E—expressed; NE—not expressed; IPMN—intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms; MCN—mucinous neoplasms.
Table
Table 2. Previous studies in pancreatic cancer with MUC5AC and outcomes **.
Table 2. Previous studies in pancreatic cancer with MUC5AC and outcomes **.
Study (N)Specimen SourceMUC5AC Variant Used for IHC Expression Site—Cytoplasmic vs. ApicalDifferentiation Expression Level Threshold—Positive vs. Negative Positive MUC5AC vs. Negative MUC5AC Tumors (N)Outcome in MUC5AC-Positive TumorsOutcome
Takikita, 2009, All ductal adenocarcinomas
(Well, moderate, and poor differentiated tumors) (154) [55].		Tissue microarrays CLH2 monoclonal antibody **No distinctionNegative/weak (negative) vs. moderate/strong (positive)99 vs. 55Better survivalMedian OS, 10 vs. 5 m 1
Takikita, 2009, All cancers (adenocarcinoma +NET) (161) [55]99 vs. 62Worse survival Median OS, 5 vs. 9.5 m 1
Takikita, 2009, Only well and moderate differentiated ductal adenocarcinomas (120) [55].82 vs. 38Worse SurvivalMedian OS 5 vs. 12 m 1
Higashi (114) [56]EUS-FNA Membrane (apical) or Cytoplasm<10% vs. ≥10%68 vs. 20Better survival in Stage III/IV PDA
Jinfeng, 2003 (33) [57]Resection Cytoplasm <5% vs. ≥5%21 vs. 12 Better survivalMUC5AC-negative expression was associated LN/LVI/AVI
Takano (59) [58]Resection No distinction ≤25% vs. >25%15 vs. 44More LN metastatic disease
Aloysius * (104) [59]ResectionCytoplasmicHigh (≥100) vs. low (<100) H-score 29 vs. 75Worse survival Increased risk of recurrence *** LVI/PNI ***
* In periampullary tumors, not specifically in pancreatic cancers. ** All studies used commercially available CLH2 monoclonal antibody for immunohistochemistry; *** Associated with high H-score; IHC—immunohistochemistry; PDA—pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; NET—neuroendocrine tumors; LN—lymph node; LVI—lymph vascular invasion; PNI—perineural invasion; EU—endoscopic ultrasound; FNA—fine needle aspirate; m—months; Mab—monoclonal antibody; 1—median OS of MUC5AC-positive vs. MUC5AC-negative tumors.
Table
Table 3. NPC-1C and PAM4 monoclonal antibody in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Table 3. NPC-1C and PAM4 monoclonal antibody in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Characteristic NPC-1CPAM4
Target Not defined e-fragment (AA1575-2052) comprising Cys2-3-4 on N-terminus
PDA prevalence 48% by IHC
53% FC 		85% by IHC
Serum testing in PDA
(% above cut-off) 		82% * 81% **
Prevalent in other cancer tissuesColon ***Colon, lung, and gastric
Similar characteristicsNegative in normal pancreatic tissue
Targets are different from CLH2, 45-M1, and 21-1 mabs
Immunogenic
* 5/41 samples cancer patients tested with ELISA had pancreatic cancer, Cut-off value 355 cells/well; ** cut-off value -2.4 units/mL; *** Not present in lung cancer. IHC—immunohistochemistry; PDA—pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; mab—monoclonal antibody; FC—flow cytometry.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Manne, A.; Esnakula, A.; Abushahin, L.; Tsung, A. Understanding the Clinical Impact of MUC5AC Expression on Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 3059. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123059

AMA Style

Manne A, Esnakula A, Abushahin L, Tsung A. Understanding the Clinical Impact of MUC5AC Expression on Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers. 2021; 13(12):3059. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Manne, Ashish, Ashwini Esnakula, Laith Abushahin, and Allan Tsung. 2021. "Understanding the Clinical Impact of MUC5AC Expression on Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma" Cancers 13, no. 12: 3059. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123059

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop