Next Article in Journal
LNX1 Modulates Notch1 Signaling to Promote Expansion of the Glioma Stem Cell Population during Temozolomide Therapy in Glioblastoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Centromeric KIR AA Individuals Harbor Particular KIR Alleles Conferring Beneficial NK Cell Features with Implications in Haplo-Identical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Previous Article in Journal
Psychological Burden in Meningioma Patients under a Wait-and-Watch Strategy and after Complete Resection Is High—Results of a Prospective Single Center Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/cancers12123504
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cancer Immunotherapy by Blocking Immune Checkpoints on Innate Lymphocytes

by
Silvia Pesce
1,†,
Sara Trabanelli
2,3,†,
Clara Di Vito
4,5,†,
Marco Greppi
1,
Valentina Obino
1,
Fabio Guolo
6,7,
Paola Minetto
6,7,
Matteo Bozzo
8,
Michela Calvi
4,5,
Elisa Zaghi
4,
Simona Candiani
8,
Roberto Massimo Lemoli
6,7,
Camilla Jandus
2,3,‡,
Domenico Mavilio
4,5,‡ and
Emanuela Marcenaro
1,*,‡
1
Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES) and Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research (CEBR), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy
2
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
3
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Lausanne Branch, CH-1066 Lausanne, Switzerland
4
Unit of Clinical and Experimental Immunology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
5
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine (BIOMETRA), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
6
Clinic of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy
7
IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
8
Department of Earth, Environment and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
These authors share senior authorship.
Cancers 2020, 12(12), 3504; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123504
Submission received: 20 October 2020 / Revised: 18 November 2020 / Accepted: 20 November 2020 / Published: 25 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue NK/ILCs in Tumors)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The emergence of immunotherapy for cancer treatment bears considerable clinical promise. The role of NK cells in tumor immunosurveillance and their potential for successful cancer immunotherapy strategies is currently established. Specific focus is placed on the use of specialized monoclonal antibodies against NK cell immune checkpoints (ICI). The recent discovery that also helper ILCs express inhibitory IC suggests that these molecules might be also targeted on ILCs to modulate their functions in the tumor microenvironment. Herein, we provide an overview of the current knowledge on IC on NK cells and ILCs and we discuss how to target these innate lymphocytes by ICI in both solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Overall, we believe that, in our near future, immunotherapy protocols will need to be designed taking into account all ILCs, both cytotoxic (NK) and non-cytotoxic (helper ILCs) ones, and most importantly, ILCs targeting should be tailored according to the disease.

Abstract

Immune checkpoints refer to a plethora of inhibitory pathways of the immune system that play a crucial role in maintaining self-tolerance and in tuning the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses to minimize collateral tissue damages. The breakdown of this delicate balance leads to pathological conditions, including cancer. Indeed, tumor cells can develop multiple mechanisms to escape from immune system defense, including the activation of immune checkpoint pathways. The development of monoclonal antibodies, targeting inhibitory immune checkpoints, has provided an immense breakthrough in cancer therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), initially developed to reverse functional exhaustion in T cells, recently emerged as important actors in natural killer (NK)-cell-based immunotherapy. Moreover, the discovery that also helper innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) express inhibitory immune checkpoints, suggests that these molecules might be targeted on ILCs, to modulate their functions in the tumor microenvironment. Recently, other strategies to achieve immune checkpoint blockade have been developed, including miRNA exploiting systems. Herein, we provide an overview of the current knowledge on inhibitory immune checkpoints on NK cells and ILCs and we discuss how to target these innate lymphocytes by ICI in both solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

1. Introduction

Innate lymphocytes (ILs) are a heterogeneous group of non-B and non-T lymphocytes. Recent progress in the understanding of their cytokine production, cytotoxic functions, and transcription factors involved in their development has led to an improved classification of these cells into five distinct subsets, namely natural killer (NK) cells, helper ILCs (i.e., ILC1s, ILC2s, ILC3s), and lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells [1,2].
While NK cells represent the innate counterpart of CD8+ T lymphocytes, helper ILCs mirror the CD4+ T helper lymphocytes [3]. NK effector-functions are finely tuned by an array of receptors mediating either inhibitory or activating signals. The lack or reduced expression of self-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-I alleles, a frequent event in malignant cells, induces the NK-cell activation and cytotoxicity through the release of perforin and granzymes as well as the rapid production of Interferon (IFN)-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [3,4,5,6].
In humans, NK cells can be further subdivided into functionally distinct subsets based on the surface expression of CD56 and CD16 that are differently distributed in healthy or inflamed tissue [4,7,8,9,10].
Helper ILC1s, similarly to NK cells and Th1 cells, express T-bet, produce IFN-γ, and represent potent effectors against infections, but are generally poorly cytotoxic [11,12].
Notably, a CD56+ILC1-like cell population with cytotoxic properties and sharing features with both ILC1s and CD56bright NK cells has been recently described [13].
Similar to Th2 cells, ILC2s express high levels of GATA3 and are involved in the production of type 2 cytokines including interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13, in response to IL-25 and IL-33 produced by epithelial cells or other immune cells following parasite infections or allergen exposure [2,12,14]. In addition, ILC2s produce amphiregulin, a member of the epidermal growth factor that helps repairing damaged tissues [15].
ILC3s are RORγt+ lymphocytes, mainly resident in the gut lamina propria, but also localized in skin, lung, liver, and decidua, where they participate in tissue homeostasis at the steady state and in protective immune responses against extracellular bacteria and fungi by secreting Th17 cytokines [16,17].
In addition to ILC3s, also LTi cells are able to produce IL-22 and IL-17 to initiate protective immune responses against extracellular bacteria [18]. They are mainly involved in lymphoid organogenesis during embryogenesis, but LTi-like cells have also been found in post-natal life, where they participate in the development of T and B cells [19].
Among the innate lymphocytes, NK cells are undeniably the best-studied mediators of anti-tumor innate immune responses. Indeed, NK cells are the most abundant innate lymphocytes and usually their presence correlates with a better prognosis and a decreased metastatic potential in human cancers [20,21]. Moreover, their ability to recognize and eliminate nascent transformed cells is corroborated by the observation that individuals with a decreased natural cytotoxic activity have an increased cancer risk [22].
In addition to NK cells, several lines of evidence indicate that helper ILCs are increased at the tumor site [23]. However, while NK cells possess a clear tumor-suppressive role in several cancers, helper ILCs are emerging to have pro- and anti-tumor properties depending on the microenvironment, probably because of their high plasticity and heterogeneity [24].
Furthermore, tumor cells can render all ILCs inefficient in controlling cancer initiation and progression, by developing multiple mechanisms to favor immune evasion. Among them, the activation of immune checkpoint (IC) pathways, through the expression of ligands for inhibitory receptors and the modulation of inhibitory and activating receptor expression, represents one of the most attractive targetable tumor-escape mechanisms to restore anti-tumor immunity [23].
As a matter of fact, the development of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting inhibitory receptors, has provided an immense breakthrough in cancer therapy.
Herein, we review the current knowledge on inhibitory checkpoints expressed on NK cells and helper ILCs. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive overview on the recent insights to boost NK cells against cancer by using ICI, which can act directly, through the binding to the specific inhibitor receptor, or indirectly, by promoting antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) (Table 1).

2. NK Cells

2.1. PD-1

PD-1 is an inhibitory receptor originally discovered on T cells and playing an important role in maintaining peripheral tolerance and T-cell homeostasis. However, its interaction with PD-ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2), that may be expressed on tumor cells, can inhibit T-cell function, contributing to immune escape. For this reason, PD-1 has become one of the most investigated targets for cancer immunotherapy. Although most research has centered on inhibiting PD-1 on T cells, the interest in understanding its role also in NK cells is emerging.
Indeed, PD-1 is brightly expressed on a discrete subset of circulating and fully mature (KIR+NKG2A−CD57+) NK cells belonging to CD56dim and (if present) to CD56neg subsets, from one-fourth of healthy individuals (HDs) seropositive for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). Importantly, the analysis at different time points of the PD-1+ cell subset in given individuals indicated that this population remains stable over time [26].
As a matter of fact, higher proportions of PD-1+ CD56dim NK cells can be detected in patients affected by different tumors, including Kaposi sarcoma, peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), and ovarian cancer (OC) [26,27,28,29,30]. Moreover, PD1+ NK cells have been found in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but its expression is mainly confined to the CD56bright subset. The expression of PD-1 on NK cells has been also found to have a possible unfavorable prognostic role, being particularly increased in high-grade PC patients [31].
In addition to its surface expression, recent studies showed that human NK cells display an intracytoplasmic pool of PD-1-mRNA and PD-1-protein [48].
Of note, since the size of the PD-1+ NK cell subset is enriched in the tumor microenvironment, as compared to peripheral blood (PB) of the same patient, it is conceivable that, soluble factors and/or cells in the tumor microenvironment can induce PD-1 expression [26,49]. In this regard, a key role for HCMV in PD-1+ NK subset induction was suggested [26] and PD-1 expression in spleen NK cells was selectively induced by endogenous glucocorticoids in response to murine CMV infection [49]. Recently, a correlation between the presence of glucocorticoids together with high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18) and de novo expression of PD-1 on CD56bright NK cells has been established [50].
Importantly, the use of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 mAbs improves the anti-tumor activity of NK cells against PD-L1/2+ tumor cells [25,26,28,51]. This is clinically relevant for patients with tumors displaying a T-cell-resistant (i.e., HLA-I−) phenotype. In order to get an amplified and more effective response by both NK and T cells, several immunotherapeutic trials focused on the blockade of multiple ICs shared by these immune cells are ongoing (Table 1). In this regard, a combination of monalizumab (anti-NKG2A) and durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) has been evaluated in a first-in-human dose-escalation/dose-expansion phase I trial in patients with metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC). The rationale of this study was supported by preclinical models (https://www.innate-pharma.com/sites/default/files/180205asco_15poster_09.pdf) and was based on the hypothesis that the inhibition of NKG2A might improve the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1-disrupting agents. This study included 40 patients in the MSS-CRC expansion cohort. The treatment was well-tolerated; 3 responses and 11 disease stabilizations were observed, with a disease control rate of 24% at 16 weeks [32].

2.2. KIRs

Killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) can be divided into two categories depending on the number of extracellular Ig-like domains (two for the KIR2D and three for the KIR3D), and depending on the cytoplasmatic tail which dictates the function of the molecule into: Inhibitory KIRs (iKIR), with a long (L) cytoplasmic tail with two tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs); activating KIRs (aKIR), with a short (S) cytoplasmic tail containing a charged amino acidic residue associated to the KARAP/DAP12 adaptor molecule, bearing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activating motifs [52,53]. In humans, 13 genes and 2 pseudogenes coding for KIR molecules have been identified. An additional step of KIR heterogeneity is given by the high number of polymorphisms of these molecules (1110 different KIR polymorphisms currently identified in the IPD-KIR Database, release 2.9.0).
KIRs are clonally expressed on NK cells, meaning that each cell expresses a different set of KIRs, determined randomly. Only cells expressing at least one KIR (or the heterodimer CD94/NKG2A) that recognizes self-HLA undergo “education” and become licensed [54]. Indeed, the higher the binding of iKIRs to their ligands during NK-cell maturation is, the higher the cytotoxicity of the cell is. Conversely, a high binding of aKIRs to their ligands leads to a lower cytotoxicity [55]. Generally, NK cells recognize and kill cells that do not express or express low levels of ligands for their iKIRs. This mechanism is defined as “missing self-hypothesis” and it is the reason why NK cells are fundamental in tumor immunosurveillance.
Of note, the interaction between KIR and HLA-I may act as promoter (aKIR) or dampen (iKIR) for a phenotype change. In particular, the highly cytotoxic CD56dim KIR+ NK cells, can acquire surface CCR7 upon interaction with CCR7+ cells, becoming able to migrate in response to the secondary lymphoid-tissue chemokines CCL19/CCL21. This novel NK-cell ability occurs through a trogocytosis mechanism and precedes the NK-mediated cytolysis [56,57,58,59].
Specifically, NK cells are fundamental for recognizing tumors downregulating HLA-I molecules in order to escape from T cells [53] Reversely, for tumor cells that do not loose HLA-I, iKIRs can be considered as additional IC that aid the immunoevasion of the transformed cells. For this reason, numerous immunotherapies based on mAbs blocking iKIR-HLA interactions have been developed to unleash NK cells against HLA-I+ tumor cells, thus increasing the potential activity of these cytotoxic innate effectors (Table 1).
The first anti-pan-KIR2D developed, lirilumab (Innate Pharma) [34], is included in at least thirteen clinical trials (4 Phase-I, 5 Phase-II, 4 Phase-I/II) with two studies terminated [both Phase II trials, one was terminated because of the sponsor’s decision not to pursue the development of lirilumab for myeloid malignancies (NCT02599649), the other was terminated because of the response rates not meeting the anticipated minimum of 30% (NCT02399917)]. Of these studies six are on solid tumors, six on hematological malignancies and one is on all pediatric tumors. Although lirilumab is well tolerated for doses up to 10 mg/kg in monotherapy, unfortunately monotherapy with lirilumab did not show significative results, thus its effects are now mostly studied in combination with other ICIs, especially nivolumab (anti-PD-1, 7 clinical trials). A clinical trial, completed on 11 August 2020, studying the effect of lirilumab in combination with nivolumab and with nivolumab and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) in patients with advanced solid tumors, was presented in a press release. The combination of lirilumab and nivolumab in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and the neck (SCCHN) patients (n = 29) was well-tolerated and resulted in an objective response rate of 24%, with durable response (NCT03341936).
Lirilumab is currently under study also in combination with elotuzumab (anti-CS1, NCT02252263) or rituximab (anti-CD20, NCT02481297) in multiple myeloma (MM), and with nivolumab or lirilumab and ipilimumab, together with other drug combinations, in MM, HL, and non-Hodgkin (NHL) lymphomas (Phase I/II trial, NCT01592370).
In addition to mAbs targeting KIRs, alternative strategies to target the KIR/HLA-I axis are under investigation. As an example, a miRNA (miR146a-5p) targeting KIR2DL1/KIR2DL2 mRNA by abrogating their expression has been recently identified [60,61]. This result may be exploited to generate/increment the effect of NK-cell KIR-mismatching against HLA-I+ tumor cells and thus improve the NK-mediated anti-tumor activity.

2.3. NKG2A

NKG2A is an inhibitory receptor that, together with its activating counterpart NKG2C, belongs to the C-type lectin receptor family. It is expressed in association with CD94 on almost 50% of the NK cells in the PB [62].
The CD94/NKG2 complexes recognize the non-classical HLA-E molecule, expressed in most human tissues and displaying signal peptides derived from leader peptide sequences of other HLA-I molecules [63,64] or HCMV [65]. The engagement of CD94/NKG2A leads to the phosphorylation of their ITIM, resulting in an inhibitory signal that suppresses competing signals from NKG2C [63,66,67]. Under physiological conditions, this mechanism provides an important “self-signal” to allow self-tolerance and to prevent the destruction of self-bystander cells.
In human cancer, while classical HLA alleles are frequently lost to prevent T-cell recognition [68], HLA-E expression is even upregulated, as a protective mechanism of cancer cells against immune surveillance and elimination by cytotoxic lymphocytes [69]. Indeed, IFN-γ secreted by immune cells during anti-tumor immune responses upregulates the expression of HLA-E on tumor cells [70,71]. High levels of HLA-E have been reported in several cancer types, including NSCLC [72], glioblastoma [73], melanoma, breast (BC) [74], liver [75], kidney [76], gynecological [77], and colorectal cancers [78,79].
In turn, the overexpression of HLA-E on cancer cells drives the upregulation of CD94/NKG2A on cytotoxic lymphocytes, including NK cells, in both hematological and solid tumors [80]. In fact, tumor-infiltrating NK cells have higher expression of NKG2A than non-tumoral NK cells in NSCLC [81,82], BC [83], and OC [84]. Moreover, a direct correlation between levels of HLA-E expression and those of NKG2A and CD94 in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes has been observed [80].
The binding of CD94/NKG2A to HLA-E/peptide on tumor cells results in the inhibition of the effector-functions of NK cells [85] and of other cytotoxic lymphocytes, thus leading to a poor prognosis in various solid cancers [74,78]. Likewise, phenotypic abnormalities have been reported also in NK cells from patients affected by hematologic malignancies. Indeed, PB NK cells from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients show impaired effector functions and an upregulation of NKG2A accompanied by decreased expression of NKp46 [86].
These data highlight an important role of the NKG2A/HLA-E axis in preventing the activation of cytotoxic NK cells in the tumor microenvironment, thus making NKG2A a suitable targetable checkpoint to unleash NK-cell-mediated responses against HLA-E+ tumor cells.
As a matter of fact, a mAb against NKG2A (IPH2201, monalizumab) has been developed by Innate Pharma (Marseille, France) in partnership with AstraZeneca (Cambridge United Kingdom) [36] and it is now employed in various trials for the treatment of different tumors (reviewed in [87]). In this regard, a phase I clinical trial (NCT02459301) in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic gynaecologic cancers has been completed and shows that monalizumab administration leads to short-term stabilization with minimal treatment toxicities and excellent treatment tolerance [35].
Moreover, since preclinical studies showed that anti-NKG2A in combination with anti-PD-L1 mAbs has a synergistic effect on tumors expressing both HLA-E and PD-L1 [36], several clinical trials are now investigating the effectiveness of monalizumab in combination with other compounds, including anti-PD-L1 (NCT02643550, NCT03822351, NCT04145193, NCT03833440, NCT02671435, NCT03794544), anti-EGFR (NCT02643550), and anti-Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (NCT02557516) [5,88] (Table 1).
In the context of hematologic malignancies, we recently described in patients undergoing a haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) the early expansion of anergic donor-derived NK-cell subpopulation expressing high levels of NKG2A [10]. Ongoing studies are now investigating whether the administration of monalizumab, early after haplo-HSCT, can restore the NK-cell cytotoxicity thus improving engraftment and limiting the onset of opportunistic infections and the occurrence of acute graft versus host disease [87].
In addition to mAbs targeting NKG2A, alternative strategies to target the NKG2A/HLA-E axis are under investigation. As an example, a construct containing a fragment derived from an anti-NKG2A antibody linked to endoplasmic reticulum-retention domains, has been developed to abrogate NKG2A expression [80].

2.4. TIM-3

T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM-3) is an inhibitory receptor able to recognize several ligands. In particular, TIM-3 binds galectin-9, which is upregulated in various cancers and chronic infections [89,90,91,92,93,94], causing the apoptosis of Th1 cells [95]. The TIM-3 variable IgV domain has also been reported to bind high mobility group protein B1 and this binding compromises the activation of immune responses. In addition, TIM-3 recognizes phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) [89,90] and carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesionmolecule 1 (Ceacam-1). PtdSer is over-expressed in apoptotic cells and induces the clearing of apoptotic bodies and the reduction of antigen cross-presentation by dendritic cells (DCs) [74,96], while the interaction between TIM-3 and Ceacam-1 is involved in T-cell exhaustion promotion, thus suggesting that the inhibitory function of TIM-3 depends on Ceacam-1 co-expression [97].
TIM-3 expression is quite spread among immune cells, indeed CD4+, CD8+ and regulatory (Treg) T cells, B cells, NK cells, NKT cells, and myeloid cells may be TIM-3+ [90,98]. TIM-3 engagement with its ligands induces immune tolerance by exhausting T cells as well as NK cells [39,92,99,100].
Regarding NK cells, TIM-3 is highly expressed in resting NK cells as compared to the CD56+ NKT and CD56+ T cells [101]. Its expression is mainly restricted to the CD56dim subset and may be upregulated on CD56bright cells upon cytokine stimulation [101,102]. High frequencies of circulating and/or tumor infiltrating TIM-3+ NK cells have been found in different types of malignant tumors [38,40,103] including gastric cancer (GC) [38], lung adenocarcinoma [39], advanced melanoma [40], and bladder cancer [38,39,40,41]. Importantly, while the increased surface levels of TIM-3 on NK cells in cancers induce NK-cell impairment [41], the in vitro and ex vivo TIM-3 blockade results in increased NK-cell cytotoxicity [39,40,104]. Contrariwise, studies have also reported stimulatory functions of TIM-3 [105]. These divergent functions are likely associated with the existence of multiple and different TIM-3 ligands.
Co-expression of TIM-3 and PD-1 was shown to mediate the exhaustion of CD8+ T cells in various cancers and chronic viral infections [106,107,108,109,110]. On the contrary, clear data about a possible co-expression of TIM-3 and PD-1 on NK cells are not yet available. In this context, anti-TIM3 antibodies, including Sym023, cobolimab, LY3321367, BGB-A425, and MBG453, in combination with several anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, are under clinical investigation for their efficacy against various cancers. Sym023 has been developed and is being tested in phase I clinical trials, in patients with advanced and metastatic solid tumor malignancies or lymphomas refractory to currently available therapies, in monotherapy or in combination with anti-PD-1 or anti-LAG-3 antibodies (NCT03489343 and NCT03311412). Additional phase I studies of anti-TIM-3 antibodies have been initiated in patients with advanced solid tumors, as a monotherapy or in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody (NCT02817633, NCT03680508, NCT04139902, NCT03680508, NCT03744468). Relatlimab (BMS-986016 TSR-022, Tesaro Inc, Waltham, MA, United States) is under investigation in three clinical trials in advanced cancer alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 (NCT02817633, NCT03307785), and in primary liver cancer in combination with anti-PD-1 (NCT03680508). MBG453 (Novartis) is being evaluated as monotherapy or in combination with anti-PD-1 in patients with advanced malignancies (NCT02608268) and patients with AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (NCT03066648) (Table 1).

2.5. TIGIT

T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT) is an immune inhibitory receptor of T and activated NK cells. TIGIT competes with the activating receptor DNAM-1 for binding PVR and Nectin-2 [111]. Upregulation of both TIGIT and its ligands have been described in multiple cancer types. TIGIT expression on NK cells, and the consequent exhaustion of these cells, has recently been described in colon cancer patients and tumor models [42]. Moreover, the expression of PVR was shown to correlate with a diminished tumor infiltration and with increased VEGF expression and increased angiogenesis [112]. TIGIT expression was proven to suppress both NK and CD8+ T-cell function in CRC growth [42].
Conversely to CTLA-4 and PD-1, TIGIT was associated to NK-cell exhaustion in a mouse model of colon cancer and TIGIT blockade was capable of reverting the condition allowing NK cells to trigger an anti-tumor immune response. TIGIT blockade was proven to synergize with anti-PD-L1 antibody therapy helping memory immunity in tumor rechallenge models [42].
In hematological tumors, TIGIT was suggested as a biomarker in the context of allogeneic HSCT, because of its correlation with a diminished NK-cell count in the bone marrow (BM) after transplant. Thus, TIGIT blockade was suggested as a potent strategy to increase graft versus leukemia effect in allogeneic HSCT in AML [43].
Because of the rapid consolidation of TIGIT as an important player in immuno-escape, numerous anti-TIGIT mAbs are currently being tested for clinical use. In this regard, tiragolumab (Genetech/Roche, South San Francisco, CA, United States) is currently under investigation together with atezolizumab (anti-PD-1) on cervical cancer (NCT04300647), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NCT04543617), small cell lung cancer (NCT04256421), NSCLC (NCT04513925, NCT03563716), esophageal cancer (NCT04540211, NCT03281369), advanced liver cancer (together with the anti-VEGF bevacizumab, NCT04524871), urothelial carcinoma (NCT03869190), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NCT03193190), and advanced metastatic tumors (NCT02794571). Moreover, BMS-986207 (Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY, United States) is being tested as a single agent in MM (NCT04150965) and as a single agent or together with nivolumab on advanced solid tumors (NCT04570839).
Etigilimab (OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Redwood City, CA, United States) was tested together with nivolumab in a single trial that was terminated because of the decision of the sponsor (NCT03119428); AB154 (Arcus Bioscience, Hayward, CA, United States ) is being tested alone and together with zimberelimab (anti-PD-1) in advanced solid tumors (NCT03628677) and in lung cancer (NCT04262856) (Table 1).

2.6. LAG-3

Lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily receptors with inhibitory properties [113]. LAG-3 is a negative co-inhibitory receptor mainly expressed on T and NK cells, but also on other immune cells including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), Treg, iNKT cells, B cells, and DCs [89,114,115,116,117,118,119]. It recognizes MHC class II (MHC-II) molecules (with greater affinity than CD4) [113,120,121], the C-type lectin receptor LSECtin, and a fibrinogen-like protein1 (FGL1) on target cells [120,122,123].
Engagement of LAG-3 promotes T-cell exhaustion [124,125,126] and the suppressive activity of Treg [116,127]. In addition, LAG-3 synergizes with PD-1 in T-cell functional regulation to promote tumor immune escape [128]. LAG-3 has been shown to suppress immune responses in several tumors, including HL, GC, BC [111] and its blockade restores T-cell functions [125]. On the other hand, its specific role in regulating NK-cell function is still not fully clarified and recent findings suggest that LAG-3 is expressed on “adaptive” NK cells chronically exposed to HCMV rather than on activated NK cells [129,130].
Nevertheless, LAG-3 is currently considered a good target for immunotherapy in order to strengthen not only T-cell anti-tumor activity, but also the NK cell once probably through ADCC.
In this context, different anti-LAG-3 antibodies [i.e., relatlimab (BMS-986016)] are currently being used in phase I and phase II clinical trials as single drugs in metastatic cancers, solid tumors and lymphoma (NCT03489369), or in association with other ICIs, including, anti-TIGIT in MM (NCT04150965), with or without anti-PD-1 antibodies in treating patients with advanced NSLCC (NCT02658981), solid tumors (NCT01968109, NCT03470922, NCT02720068, NCT03250832, NCT02460224, NCT03365791), and hematologic malignancies (NCT03365791, NCT03598608), advanced malignancies (NCT03005782) including SCCHN (NCT04080804), triple-negative BC (NCT03499899), and metastatic melanoma (NCT03484923). A number of additional LAG-3 antibodies are currently in preclinical development (Table 1).
In addition, a soluble recombinant LAG-3-Ig fusion protein, Eftilagimod alpha (IMP321), has been used as an immunological adjuvant for vaccination against various infections and cancer. It has been employed as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy in cancer (NCT02676869) [45], in metastatic BC (NCT00349934), in patients with melanoma (NCT01308294) and with PD-1 in SCCHN (NCT03625323).
IMP321 was able to induce cytokine production (IFN-γ and/or TNF-α) by NK cells in PBMCs from HDs and, to a lower extent, in PBMCs from 21 untreated metastatic cancer patients in a short-term ex vivo assay [131]. In metastatic renal cancer patients, IMP321, in a dose-escalation study (P003), induced NK-cell activation as monotherapy [132]. In BC patients IMP321, associated with standard chemotherapy, induced an enhanced NK-cell activation for several months [133].
Hence, LAG-3 has the potential to activate T cells as well as NK cells and it can be further explored as a potential target for checkpoint inhibition.

3. Helper ILCs

NK cells being the innate counterparts of CD8+ T cells, helper ILCs are viewed as mirrors of CD4+ T helper cells. Despite many shared patterns, we and others also identified distinct regulatory circuits of ILC and T helper by comparing their transcriptomic profiles [134,135,136,137]. Of note, transcripts encoding for ICs are less abundant in human resting ILCs than in CD4+ T-helper cells, eventually contributing to their ability to swiftly respond to external stimuli in an antigen-independent manner. Upon activation, a dynamic modulation of inhibitory receptor expression occurs to ensure proper termination of the response and resolution of inflammation. However, while the role of checkpoint molecules has been largely explored in T-cell responses, only recent studies have started to uncover the involvement of ICs in tuning helper ILC-dependent immunity, including in anti-tumor responses.

3.1. PD-1

PD-1 was initially described as a marker of ILC progenitors [137,138]. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis on Lin-Flt3lo/−IL-7Rαlo/+α4β7+ BM cells revealed a cluster of ILCs expressing Pdcd1 (encoding for PD-1) together with Id2, Tcf7, Tox, and Gata3. Differently from T cells, the ILCs belonging to this cluster did not express other inhibitory or activation molecules. Isolated PD-1hi ILCs, transferred in vivo or individually seeded in vitro, differentiated in all the ILC subsets, without generating B or T cells, demonstrate that PD-1 expression identified unipotent and pluripotent ILC progenitors. A deeper analysis showed that only the PD-1hi ILCs, also positive for Bcl11b and IL-25R, were able to differentiate exclusively into ILC2s, defining IL-25R as a marker of early ILC2 progenitors in PD-1hi cells. However, also a certain percentage of peripheral terminally differentiated ILCs expressed PD-1 and, upon influenza infection or papain challenge, proliferated and secreted high amount of IL-13 and IL-5. On the contrary, Taylor et al. [139] showed that PD-1+KLRG1+ ILC2s had a proliferative disadvantage in comparison to PD-1−KLRG1+ ILC2s. This result, however, was not confirmed by Batyrova et al. [140], who reported no difference in KLRG1+ ILC2s between Rag1−/− and Pdcd1−/− xRag1−/− mice.
Some differences in the experimental models could explain the dichotomies observed in these first publications. First of all, Taylor et al. [139] used Pdcd1−/− mice that were not used by Yu et al. [137], and Batyrova et al. [140]. used Rag1−/− as background for all the experiments. Taylor et al. [139] and Batyrova et al. [140], moreover, focused on KLRG1+ ILC2s and helminth infection, differently from Yu et al. [137], that were not restricting their analysis to the ILC2s expressing KLRG1 and that were using influenza infection and papain challenge. In addition, while Taylor et al. [139] identified in IL-33 the trigger for PD-1 expression and Batyrova et al. [140] in PPAR-γ agonists, Yu et al. [137], did not determine the signals inducing the PD-1+ ILC progenitor. Another interesting point is that, in the model of Taylor, after 3 days of stimulation, ILC2s started to upregulate PD-L1. It is therefore possible that the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction on different ILC2s could influence their proliferation and function leading to different results overtime.
PD-1 expression on ILC2s is modulated by cytokines. A cascade involving TNFα-induced IL-33 secretion by pre-adipocytes was shown to induce PD-1 expression in adipose tissue ILC2s in obese mice. As a consequence, PD-L1highM1 macrophages triggered PD-1 on ILC2s in models of high-fat diet-induced obesity, leading to ILC2 dysfunction and limiting type-2 mediated tissue beiging. Therapeutic blockade of PD-1 in these animals partially restored ILC2 functions and ameliorated the metabolic homeostasis [141]. In line with these findings, Helou et al. [142] reported that PD-1 is inducible on pulmonary ILC2s upon intranasal IL-33 stimulation. By comparing the transcriptomic profiles of pulmonary ILC2s from WT and PD-1 knockout mice the authors highlight an in cis interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 in IL-33 activated ILC2s. This binding, as well as an in trans PD-1/PD-L2 engagement, is responsible for the impaired ILC2 cytokine secretion and survival that mechanistically occurs at least in part through a metabolic switch. Indeed, deficiency of PD-1 resulted in the upregulation of glycolysis-dependent genes and in the increase of amino acid degradation, showing for the first time a PD-1-dependent metabolic inhibition of ILC2 proliferation. By developing and testing a PD-1 agonist in a humanized mouse model of house dust mite-induced asthma the authors demonstrate the potential of PD-1 inhibition of ILC2s in asthma treatment.
Beside ILC2s, PD-1 is also expressed by human group 3 ILCs in the decidua [17]. During the first trimester of pregnancy, CD56+ ILC3s and CD56− ILC3s (also referred as lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi-like cells) expressed PD-1 and TIM-3 (see also below), but not LAG-3 and TIGIT. PD-1 expression limited the ILC3 cytokine production and decreased after the first trimester. Because intermediate extravillous trophoblast (iEVT) and decidual stromal cells express PD-L1, the presence of PD-1+ ILC3s during the first trimester could contribute to the feto-maternal tolerance. This speculation is supported by the fact that, in samples obtained from spontaneous abortion, PD-L1 expression in iEVT was much lower than in normal pregnancies. However, this new mechanism of immune-tolerance would need to be confirmed and analyzed in in vivo models.

3.2. PD-1 Expression on ILCs in Cancer

Salimi et al. were the first in documenting the expression of ICs (i.e., PD-1 and CTLA-4) in ILCs present in human tumor tissues [24]. They observed no difference in the expression of PD-1 in ILCs present in malignant versus benign BC tissues. However, the level of PD-1 in tumor-associated ILC2s was higher in comparison with the circulating ILCs. Interestingly, in gastrointestinal tumors, ILC2s and ILC3s express higher PD-1 than in the perilesional tissue. This phenotype was partially associated with an increase in HLA-DR, KLRG1, CD69, and CD44, and with a decrease in CCR7 expression. Whether PD-1+ILCs in tumor tissues are more activated or exhausted is yet to be determined.
Subsequently, the analysis of the innate cell compartment of patients presenting human-malignant pleural effusion revealed an infiltration by all the ILC subsets, with a prevalence of PD-1+ ILC3s [29]. By activating these cells through their natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCR, i.e., NKp30, NKp44 and NKp46), the authors showed that a small proportion (2.5–6% of NCR+ ILC3s) could produce IFN-γ and TNF-α. Interestingly, by using an anti-PD-1 antibody or a recombinant PD-L1 molecule, the production of IFN-γ and TNF-α was inhibited, suggesting that, in the tumor microenvironment, the anti-tumor activity of ILC3s could be repressed because of their PD-1 expression.
In another work, Wang et al. identified six ILC subsets by performing single-cell RNA sequencing to profile tumor-infiltrating ILCs in an azoxymethane/dextran sodium sulfate (AOM/DSS)-induced colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) model [33]. Among those, three subsets expressed ILC2 signature genes (ILC2-A, -B, and -C). The ILC2-C subpopulation expressed high PD-1 and HS3ST1 (heparan sulfate3-O-sulfotransferase 1). Because of several elegant experiments, among which are the transfer of PD-1highILC2s in B-NSG mice, the deletion of PD-1 and HS3ST1 from ILC2s by CRISPR-Cas9 technology, the generation of Hs3st1flox/floxId2-CreERT2 mice, the targeting of PD-1 with an anti-PD-1 antibody, Wang et al. demonstrated that PD-1+ and HS3ST1+ ILC2s are involved in CRC tumor progression.
Further, Moral and colleagues dissected a synergistic effect of anti-PD1 blockade targeting both anti-tumor ILC2s and CD8+ T cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [143]. The authors reported on abundant infiltration of human and murine PDAC by ILC2s. In mice, these cells were induced by in situ-secreted IL-33 to release CCL5, recruiting CD103+ DCs that in turn promoted the priming of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Of note, as previously reported by others, IL-33 induced PD-1 expression on ILC2s, and combined administration of recombinant IL-33 and anti-PD-1 antibodies acted synergistically in sustaining ILC2 anti-tumor functions and in restoring CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity. This resulted in significant tumor size reduction and prolonged animal survival. As a correlate, PD-1+ ILC2s were detected in human PDAC and IL-33 mRNA transcripts correlated with improved survival in patients with PDAC (Table 1).
Further work is needed to decipher the implication of PD-1 in pro- or anti-tumor functions of ILC2s in cancer and to define the impact of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy on ILC2s.

3.3. CTLA-4

In steady state conditions, CTLA-4 transcripts are poorly present in ILCs and cell surface protein is almost undetectable in human ILCs [135]. Salimi et al. reported the expression of CTLA-4 in tumor-associated ILC1s and ILC2s, being higher in comparison with the circulating ILCs, while no difference was observed in malignant versus benign BC tissues [24]. Gao and colleagues observed in different murine tumor models higher expression of CTLA-4 in intermediate ILC1s (intILC1s, being CD49a+CD49b+EOMES+), that are impaired in their ability to secrete IFN-γ but not TNF-α [144] (Table 1). The excess of TNF-α and the secretion of VEGF by ILC1s might be linked to pro-tumoral and pro-angiogenic phenomena. However, the mechanism(s) of regulation of cytokine secretion by CTLA-4 in ILCs remains to be elucidated.

3.4. TIGIT and CD96, and TGF-β

Beside their expression on conventional NK cells, TIGIT and CD96 are also found on ILC1s and splenic ILC3s [46]. While TIGIT targeting on NK cells, either alone or in combination with other ICs, leads to the restoration of anti-tumor activities [42], the functional consequence of TIGIT and/or CD96 blockade on ILCs remains unknown. Using different tumor mouse models, Gao et al. [144] reported that the intratumoral TGF-β mediates the conversion of anti-cancer NK cells into intermediate ILC1s (CD49a+CD49b+Eomes+) and ILC1s (CD49a+CD49b−Eomesint). This shift was accompanied by an upregulation of TIGIT and CD96, and concomitant reduction in DNAM-1 levels, thus creating a pro-tumor environment [144]. Besides its effect on NK-ILC1 plasticity, TGF-β signaling was also reported to drive ILC3 conversion into ILCs with a regulatory phenotype [33]. Indeed, Wang et al. [33] showed that during CRC progression, the proportion of ILC3s was decreased by concomitant expansion of Id3+ IL-10 secreting cells. Using either Tgfbr2flox/floxId2-CreERT2 mice to delete the TGF-β receptor on ILCs or a TGF-β inhibitor, the conversion was inhibited and the tumor growth suppressed. This data suggested that the interference with the TGF-β signaling could be considered as a targetable checkpoint to fire at tumor infiltrating ILCs [44] (Table 1).

3.5. KLRG1

The C-type lectin KLRG1 is expressed by a subset of ILC2s, in vivo expanded by IL-25 administration, involved in anti-helminth responses and called “inflammatory” ILC2s [145]. KLRG1 ligation to E-Cadherin in vitro leads to ILC2 functional impairment with decreased IL-5 and IL-13 secretion [47], while its in vivo relevance remains unexplored. Interestingly, KLRG1 was also found to be expressed in a small percentage in ILC3s present in lymphocytes isolated from first-trimester decidual tissues [17] (Table 1). However, the role of these KLRG1+ ILC3s has not been elucidated yet. In cancer, KLRG1 transcripts have been identified in ILC2s in lung and CRC [20].

3.6. TIM-3

TIM-3+ human ILC3s were found in the decidua, to be inhibited in their IL-22 production upon TIM-3 cross-linking [17] (Table 1). Differently from PD1+ ILC3s, TIM-3+ ILC3s did not decrease after the first-trimester of pregnancy. Also in this case, in vivo experiments in animal models could provide more insights into the role of TIM-3+ ILC3s present at the feto-maternal interface. Nothing is known to date on the role of this type 1 glycoprotein on ILCs in cancer settings.

3.7. LAG-3

Expression of LAG-3 in resting ILCs has not been reported yet. As compared to their adaptive counterparts Th17 cells, that express LAG-3 to some extent, ILC3 were reported to be LAG-3 negative [135]. However, ILC3 are involved in a 3-cell party regulation dependent on LAG-3+ Tregs. In that axis, LAG-3+ Tregs, interacting with MHC-II on CX3CR1+ intestinal tissue-resident macrophages, restrained their secretion of IL-23 and IL-1β. As a consequence, the lack of a supportive environment reduced ILC3 activation and secretion of IL-22, thus suppressing colitis [146].
Moreover, Gao et al. reported that upon conversion from NKs to ILC1s in tumors, several checkpoints were upregulated, among them LAG-3, reaching much higher levels than on conventional NKs [144] (Table 1).

3.8. NKG2A

Another checkpoint molecule expressed by ILCs is NKG2A. We showed that, in humans, a population of Lin-CD127+CD56+c-Kit− ILC1-like ILCs is present in HD and in AML patients [37]. In HDs, these cells are able to kill tumor cells in a KIR-independent manner, while in AML this ability was impaired. The ILC1-like ILCs isolated from AML patients expressed lower levels of TRAIL, NKp30, and NKp80 than the ones from HD. However, they expressed high levels of the CD94/NKG2A heterodimer (up to 80%) that, upon engagement with HLA-E on leukemic targets, resulted in decreased degranulation and impairment of ILC cytotoxic functions. Whether targeting NKG2A in AML patients with monalizumab would result in a more efficient killing of the leukemic target by the ILC1-like ILCs is still to be determined.
Additionally, along with the induction of LAG-3, KLRG1, and CTLA-4 on TGF-β-induced ILC1s, NKG2A is also overexpressed during the conversion from NK cells. Yet, its functionality has not been investigated, but decreased functionality of converted ILC1s is most likely due to checkpoint upregulation [144]. However, it remains to be determined if these cells express the CD94/NKG2A heterodimer able to deliver inhibitory signals upon HLA-E engagement, similarly to NK cells.

3.9. Metabolic Checkpoints

Beside the conventional IC presented above, a novel ILC2-dependent metabolic immune checkpoints has recently been uncovered [147]. The authors show that pre-existing type2 inflammation in the lung favors metastatic seeding, in an IL-33 and ILC2-dependent manner. ILC2s were driving the local IL-5-dependent eosinophil accumulation that correlated with impaired NK-cell activities. Mechanistically, eosinophils can suppress NK-cell functions by extracellular glucose deprivation and lactic acid increase, thus impairing the NK-cell glycolysis-dependent effector functions. In this context it has been shown that the NK/eosinophil cross-talk is regulated by the interaction of NCRs with eosinophil surface ligands [148]. Future work is needed to determine how to target these novel metabolic checkpoints to reinvigorate anti-tumor immunity, either alone or in combination with the conventional ICI.

4. Conclusions

It is now evident that ICI have provided an historical step forward in our multi-year effort to fight oncological diseases. Pioneer studies showed T cells as the main actors of these successes, but it is now clear that also NK cells may represent an excellent cancer immunotherapy tool because of their ability to kill malignant cells without toxicity toward healthy cells. This is clinically relevant for patients with tumors displaying a T-cell-resistant (HLA-Ineg) phenotype. In this context, the ICI specific for NK cells, such as monalizumab and lirilumab, aimed at NKG2A and KIR inhibitory receptors respectively, have been assessed as monotherapy, and have shown good safety profiles, but mild success in terms of prolonging progression-free survival. This result is not completely surprising, because of the complexity of immuno-regulatory mechanisms and the heterogeneity of malignancies. Thus, future clinical trials will have to reveal the potency of these NK-cell ICI in combination with other cancer treatment options. Importantly, the combinations of ICI, such as CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors, that are being tried for synergistic response targeting T cells could also be tried in the context of NK cells. In this regard, it has recently been shown that PD-1 receptor is not only expressed by NK cells, but it has been also demonstrated that PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are able to enhance NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity [26]. Similarly, the anti-NKG2A mAb monalizumab can boost CD8+ T-cell as well as NK-cell immunity. Hence, a combination of a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor and a NK-cell-specific checkpoint inhibitor (such as an anti-KIR or anti-NKG2A mAb), could be of value for combined checkpoint inhibition-based immunotherapy. Thus, an eye should be kept on the ongoing clinical trials exploiting this kind of new combinations.
It is also worth considering that despite all steps forward, immune checkpoint blockade therapies are not always effective, and even responding patients may subsequently relapse. Thus, the need of a deeper monitoring of cytotoxic lymphocytes (T and NK cells) in the tumor microenvironment and of their IC expression and interplay is needed to develop more effective treatments. In this regard, another strategy might be to call in our aid helper ILCs. Indeed, while the role of checkpoint molecules has been largely explored in cytotoxic lymphocytes, only recently studies have started to uncover the involvement of immune checkpoints in fine-tuning ILC-dependent immunity. In this context, several studies show that IC molecules may play an important role also in ILCs in anti-tumor responses. Although, as of today, there are no ILC therapies ongoing, we already know that targeting ILCs in AML using monalizumab would be beneficial to unleash the cytotoxicity of ILC1-like cells. Based on the pre-clinical observations of Moral et al. [143], PD-1 targeting on ILC2s might be beneficial in pancreas adenocarcinoma. Similarly, this strategy might activate ILC3s, as suggested by Tumino et al. [29]. In contrast to that, this same therapeutic strategy might be detrimental in settings where ILC2s exert pro-tumoral functions. Indeed, the administration of anti-PD-1 might favor ILC2 activity and increase the secretion of pro-tumoral Type-2 cytokines, supporting tumor growth [144]. Thus, additional studies on checkpoint expression in ILCs are needed to define optimal ILC targeting strategy.
Overall, we believe that, in our near future, immunotherapy protocols will need to be designed taking into account all ILCs, both cytotoxic (NK) and non-cytotoxic (helper ILCs) ones, and most importantly, ILC targeting should be tailored according to the disease (Figure 1).

Author Contributions

Writing-review and editing , S.P., S.T., C.D.V.; writing, figure and table preparation, M.G., V.O. F.G., P.M., M.B., M.C., E.Z.; review and editing, S.C., R.M.L.; writing-review, editing and supervision, C.J., D.M.; writing-review, editing, supervision and funding acquisition, E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Compagnia di San Paolo (2019.866) to RML, EM, SC, SP, MG, VO, FG, PM; Fondazione Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC 5 × 1000-21147 and AIRC IG) to EM, SC, SP, MG, VO; ROCHE 2017 to SP, EM, the Swiss National Science Foundation (PRIMA PR00P3_179727) to CJ, the Swiss Cancer League (KFS-4402-02-2018) to CJ, the Helmut Horten Stiftung Foundation to CJ, Fondazione Cariplo (2015/0603) to DM, Fondazione Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IG 2018-21567) to DM, and Intramural Research Funding of Istituto Clinico Humanitas to DM. EZ was a recipient of fellowships from the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (2018-20870, 2020-24051). CDV was a recipient of the post-doctoral fellowships from the Fondazione Umberto Veronesi (2017-1464, 2018-1974, 2019-2563).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klose, C.S.N.; Artis, D. Innate lymphoid cells as regulators of immunity, inflammation and tissue homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vivier, E.; Artis, D.; Colonna, M.; Diefenbach, A.; Di Santo, J.P.; Eberl, G.; Koyasu, S.; Locksley, R.M.; McKenzie, A.N.J.; Mebius, R.E.; et al. Innate Lymphoid Cells: 10 Years On. Cell 2018, 174, 1054–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Vivier, E.; Raulet, D.H.; Moretta, A.; Caligiuri, M.A.; Zitvogel, L.; Lanier, L.L.; Yokoyama, W.M.; Ugolini, S. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science 2011, 331, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Marcenaro, E.; Ferranti, B.; Moretta, A. NK-DC interaction: On the usefulness of auto-aggression. Autoimmun Rev. 2005, 4, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Di Vito, C.; Mikulak, J.; Zaghi, E.; Pesce, S.; Marcenaro, E.; Mavilio, D. NK cells to cure cancer. Semin. Immunol. 2019, 41, 101272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marcenaro, E.; Dondero, A.; Moretta, A. Multi-directional cross-regulation of NK cell function during innate immune responses. Transpl. Immunol. 2006, 17, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stabile, H.; Fionda, C.; Gismondi, A.; Santoni, A. Role of Distinct Natural Killer Cell Subsets in Anticancer Response. Front. Immun. 2017, 8, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lugli, E.; Marcenaro, E.; Mavilio, D. NK Cell Subset Redistribution during the Course of Viral Infections. Front. Immun. 2014, 5, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Marcenaro, E.; Notarangelo, L.D.; Orange, J.S.; Vivier, E. Editorial: NK Cell Subsets in Health and Disease: New Developments. Front. Immun. 2017, 8, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Roberto, A.; Di Vito, C.; Zaghi, E.; Mazza, E.M.C.; Capucetti, A.; Calvi, M.; Tentorio, P.; Zanon, V.; Sarina, B.; Mariotti, J.; et al. The early expansion of anergic NKG2A pos/CD56 dim/CD16 neg natural killer represents a therapeutic target in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 2018, 103, 1390–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Fuchs, A.; Vermi, W.; Lee, J.S.; Lonardi, S.; Gilfillan, S.; Newberry, R.D.; Cella, M.; Colonna, M. Intraepithelial Type 1 Innate Lymphoid Cells Are a Unique Subset of IL-12- and IL-15-Responsive IFN-γ-Producing Cells. Immunity 2013, 38, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Trabanelli, S.; Gomez-Cadena, A.; Salomé, B.; Michaud, K.; Mavilio, D.; Landis, B.N.; Jandus, P.; Jandus, C. Human innate lymphoid cells (ILCs): Toward a uniform immune-phenotyping: HILC PHENOTYPE. Cytometry 2018, 94, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Salomé, B.; Jandus, C. Innate lymphoid cells in antitumor immunity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2018, 103, 479–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Herbert, D.B.; Douglas, B.; Zullo, K. Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILC2): Type 2 Immunity and Helminth Immunity. IJMS 2019, 20, 2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Monticelli, L.A.; Osborne, L.C.; Noti, M.; Tran, S.V.; Zaiss, D.M.W.; Artis, D. IL-33 promotes an innate immune pathway of intestinal tissue protection dependent on amphiregulin–EGFR interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 10762–10767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Montaldo, E.; Juelke, K.; Romagnani, C. Group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s): Origin, differentiation, and plasticity in humans and mice: Highlights—(Mini-Review). Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 2171–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vacca, P.; Pesce, S.; Greppi, M.; Fulcheri, E.; Munari, E.; Olive, D.; Mingari, M.C.; Moretta, A.; Moretta, L.; Marcenaro, E. PD-1 is expressed by and regulates human group 3 innate lymphoid cells in human decidua. Mucosal Immunol. 2019, 12, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ishizuka, I.E.; Chea, S.; Gudjonson, H.; Constantinides, M.G.; Dinner, A.R.; Bendelac, A.; Golub, R. Single-cell analysis defines the divergence between the innate lymphoid cell lineage and lymphoid tissue–inducer cell lineage. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhong, C.; Zheng, M.; Zhu, J. Lymphoid tissue inducer—A divergent member of the ILC family. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2018, 42, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Simoni, Y.; Fehlings, M.; Kløverpris, H.N.; McGovern, N.; Koo, S.-L.; Loh, C.Y.; Lim, S.; Kurioka, A.; Fergusson, J.R.; Tang, C.-L.; et al. Human Innate Lymphoid Cell Subsets Possess Tissue-Type Based Heterogeneity in Phenotype and Frequency. Immunity 2017, 46, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. López-Soto, A.; Gonzalez, S.; Smyth, M.J.; Galluzzi, L. Control of Metastasis by NK Cells. Cancer Cell 2017, 32, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Imai, K.; Matsuyama, S.; Miyake, S.; Suga, K.; Nakachi, K. Natural cytotoxic activity of peripheral-blood lymphocytes and cancer incidence: An 11-year follow-up study of a general population. Lancet 2000, 356, 1795–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Crinier, A.; Vivier, E.; Bléry, M. Helper-like innate lymphoid cells and cancer immunotherapy. Semin. Immunol. 2019, 41, 101274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Salimi, M.; Wang, R.; Yao, X.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Chang, X.; Fan, P.; Dong, T.; Ogg, G. Activated innate lymphoid cell populations accumulate in human tumour tissues. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guo, L.; Wei, R.; Lin, Y.; Kwok, H.F. Clinical and Recent Patents Applications of PD-1/PD-L1 Targeting Immunotherapy in Cancer Treatment-Current Progress, Strategy, and Future Perspective. Front. Immun. 2020, 11, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pesce, S.; Greppi, M.; Tabellini, G.; Rampinelli, F.; Parolini, S.; Olive, D.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A.; Marcenaro, E. Identification of a subset of human natural killer cells expressing high levels of programmed death 1: A phenotypic and functional characterization. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 335–346.e333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Beldi-Ferchiou, A.; Lambert, M.; Dogniaux, S.; Vély, F.; Vivier, E.; Olive, D.; Dupuy, S.; Levasseur, F.; Zucman, D.; Lebbé, C.; et al. PD-1 mediates functional exhaustion of activated NK cells in patients with Kaposi sarcoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 72961–72977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Vari, F.; Arpon, D.; Keane, C.; Hertzberg, M.S.; Talaulikar, D.; Jain, S.; Cui, Q.; Han, E.; Tobin, J.; Bird, R.; et al. Immune evasion via PD-1/PD-L1 on NK cells and monocyte/macrophages is more prominent in Hodgkin lymphoma than DLBCL. Blood 2018, 131, 1809–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tumino, N.; Martini, S.; Munari, E.; Scordamaglia, F.; Besi, F.; Mariotti, F.R.; Bogina, G.; Mingari, M.C.; Vacca, P.; Moretta, L. Presence of innate lymphoid cells in pleural effusions of primary and metastatic tumors: Functional analysis and expression of PD-1 receptor. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 1660–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Niu, C.; Li, M.; Zhu, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, L.; Xu, D.; Xu, J.; Li, Z.; Li, W.; Cui, J. PD-1-positive Natural Killer Cells have a weaker antitumor function than that of PD-1-negative Natural Killer Cells in Lung Cancer. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17, 1964–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pesce, S.; Belgrano, V.; Greppi, M.; Carlomagno, S.; Squillario, M.; Barla, A.; Della Chiesa, M.; Di Domenico, S.; Mavilio, D.; Moretta, L.; et al. Different Features of Tumor-Associated NK Cells in Patients With Low-Grade or High-Grade Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Front. Immun. 2019, 10, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Segal, N.H.; Naidoo, J.; Curigliano, G.; Patel, S.; Sahebjam, S.; Papadopoulos, K.P.; Gordon, M.S.; Wang, D.; Gómez Rueda, A.; Song, X.; et al. First-in-human dose escalation of monalizumab plus durvalumab, with expansion in patients with metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer. JCO 2018, 36, 3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, S.; Qu, Y.; Xia, P.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, G.; Tian, Y.; Ying, J.; Fan, Z. Transdifferentiation of tumor infiltrating innate lymphoid cells during progression of colorectal cancer. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 610–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vey, N.; Karlin, L.; Sadot-Lebouvier, S.; Broussais, F.; Berton-Rigaud, D.; Rey, J.; Charbonnier, A.; Marie, D.; André, P.; Paturel, C.; et al. A phase 1 study of lirilumab (antibody against killer immunoglobulin-like receptor antibody KIR2D; IPH2102) in patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 17675–17688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Tinker, A.V.; Hirte, H.W.; Provencher, D.; Butler, M.; Ritter, H.; Tu, D.; Azim, H.A.; Paralejas, P.; Grenier, N.; Hahn, S.-A.; et al. Dose-Ranging and Cohort-Expansion Study of Monalizumab (IPH2201) in Patients with Advanced Gynecologic Malignancies: A Trial of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG): IND221. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 6052–6060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. André, P.; Denis, C.; Soulas, C.; Bourbon-Caillet, C.; Lopez, J.; Arnoux, T.; Bléry, M.; Bonnafous, C.; Gauthier, L.; Morel, A.; et al. Anti-NKG2A mAb Is a Checkpoint Inhibitor that Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity by Unleashing Both T and NK Cells. Cell 2018, 175, 1731–1743.e1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Salomé, B.; Gomez-Cadena, A.; Loyon, R.; Suffiotti, M.; Salvestrini, V.; Wyss, T.; Vanoni, G.; Ruan, D.F.; Rossi, M.; Tozzo, A.; et al. CD56 as a marker of an ILC1-like population with NK cell properties that is functionally impaired in AML. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 3674–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Gu, H.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhu, D.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, W. The Clinical Significance of Abnormal Tim-3 Expression on NK Cells from Patients with Gastric Cancer. Immunol. Investig. 2015, 44, 578–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, L.; Huang, Y.; Tan, L.; Yu, W.; Chen, D.; Lu, C.; He, J.; Wu, G.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y. Increased Tim-3 expression in peripheral NK cells predicts a poorer prognosis and Tim-3 blockade improves NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in human lung adenocarcinoma. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 29, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. da Silva, I.P.; Gallois, A.; Jimenez-Baranda, S.; Khan, S.; Anderson, A.C.; Kuchroo, V.K.; Osman, I.; Bhardwaj, N. Reversal of NK-cell exhaustion in advanced melanoma by Tim-3 blockade. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014, 2, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gallois, A.; Silva, I.; Osman, I.; Bhardwaj, N. Reversal of natural killer cell exhaustion by TIM-3 blockade. OncoImmunology 2014, 3, e946365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhang, Q.; Bi, J.; Zheng, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Wu, W.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Peng, H.; Wei, H.; et al. Blockade of the checkpoint receptor TIGIT prevents NK cell exhaustion and elicits potent anti-tumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hattori, N.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Sasaki, Y.; Shimada, S.; Murai, S.; Abe, M.; Baba, Y.; Watanuki, M.; Fujiwara, S.; Arai, N.; et al. Monitoring TIGIT/DNAM-1 and PVR/PVRL2 Immune Checkpoint Expression Levels in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019, 25, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fionda, C.; Stabile, H.; Cerboni, C.; Soriani, A.; Gismondi, A.; Cippitelli, M.; Santoni, A. Hitting More Birds with a Stone: Impact of TGF-β on ILC Activity in Cancer. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sierro, S.; Romero, P.; Speiser, D.E. The CD4-like molecule LAG-3, biology and therapeutic applications. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2011, 15, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Magri, G.; Miyajima, M.; Bascones, S.; Mortha, A.; Puga, I.; Cassis, L.; Barra, C.M.; Comerma, L.; Chudnovskiy, A.; Gentile, M.; et al. Innate lymphoid cells integrate stromal and immunological signals to enhance antibody production by splenic marginal zone B cells. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Salimi, M.; Barlow, J.L.; Saunders, S.P.; Xue, L.; Gutowska-Owsiak, D.; Wang, X.; Huang, L.-C.; Johnson, D.; Scanlon, S.T.; McKenzie, A.N.J.; et al. A role for IL-25 and IL-33-driven type-2 innate lymphoid cells in atopic dermatitis. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 2939–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mariotti, F.R.; Petrini, S.; Ingegnere, T.; Tumino, N.; Besi, F.; Scordamaglia, F.; Munari, E.; Pesce, S.; Marcenaro, E.; Moretta, A.; et al. PD-1 in human NK cells: Evidence of cytoplasmic mRNA and protein expression. OncoImmunology 2019, 8, 1557030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Quatrini, L.; Wieduwild, E.; Escaliere, B.; Filtjens, J.; Chasson, L.; Laprie, C.; Vivier, E.; Ugolini, S. Endogenous glucocorticoids control host resistance to viral infection through the tissue-specific regulation of PD-1 expression on NK cells. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 954–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Quatrini, L.; Vacca, P.; Tumino, N.; Besi, F.; Di Pace, A.L.; Scordamaglia, F.; Martini, S.; Munari, E.; Mingari, M.C.; Ugolini, S.; et al. Glucocorticoids and the cytokines IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 present in the tumor microenvironment induce PD-1 expression on human natural killer cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Trefny, M.P.; Kaiser, M.; Stanczak, M.A.; Herzig, P.; Savic, S.; Wiese, M.; Lardinois, D.; Läubli, H.; Uhlenbrock, F.; Zippelius, A. PD-1+ natural killer cells in human non-small cell lung cancer can be activated by PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2020, 69, 1505–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Moretta, A.; Bottino, C.; Pende, D.; Tripodi, G.; Tambussi, G.; Viale, O.; Orengo, A.; Barbaresi, M.; Merli, A.; Ciccone, E. Identification of four subsets of human CD3-CD16+ natural killer (NK) cells by the expression of clonally distributed functional surface molecules: Correlation between subset assignment of NK clones and ability to mediate specific alloantigen recognition. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 172, 1589–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Moretta, A.; Bottino, C.; Vitale, M.; Pende, D.; Biassoni, R.; Mingari, M.C.; Moretta, L. Receptors for HLA class-I molecules in human natural killer cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1996, 14, 619–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Elliott, J.M.; Yokoyama, W.M. Unifying concepts of MHC-dependent natural killer cell education. Trends Immunol. 2011, 32, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Fauriat, C.; Ivarsson, M.A.; Ljunggren, H.-G.; Malmberg, K.-J.; Michaëlsson, J. Education of human natural killer cells by activating killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors. Blood 2010, 115, 1166–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Marcenaro, E.; Cantoni, C.; Pesce, S.; Prato, C.; Pende, D.; Agaugué, S.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A. Uptake of CCR7 and acquisition of migratory properties by human KIR+ NK cells interacting with monocyte-derived DC or EBV cell lines: Regulation by KIR/HLA-class I interaction. Blood 2009, 114, 4108–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Marcenaro, E.; Pesce, S.; Sivori, S.; Carlomagno, S.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A. KIR2DS1-dependent acquisition of CCR7 and migratory properties by human NK cells interacting with allogeneic HLA-C2+ DCs or T-cell blasts. Blood 2013, 121, 3396–3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Pesce, S.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A.; Marcenaro, E. Human NK Cell Subsets Redistribution in Pathological Conditions: A Role for CCR7 Receptor. Front. Immun. 2016, 7, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pesce, S.; Carlomagno, S.; Moretta, A.; Sivori, S.; Marcenaro, E. Uptake of CCR7 by KIR2DS4⁺ NK cells is induced upon recognition of certain HLA-C alleles. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 754373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pesce, S.; Squillario, M.; Greppi, M.; Loiacono, F.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A.; Sivori, S.; Castagnola, P.; Barla, A.; Candiani, S.; et al. New miRNA Signature Heralds Human NK Cell Subsets at Different Maturation Steps: Involvement of miR-146a-5p in the Regulation of KIR Expression. Front. Immun. 2018, 9, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pesce, S.; Greppi, M.; Ferretti, E.; Obino, V.; Carlomagno, S.; Rutigliani, M.; Thoren, F.B.; Sivori, S.; Castagnola, P.; Candiani, S.; et al. miRNAs in NK Cell-Based Immune Responses and Cancer Immunotherapy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Godal, R.; Bachanova, V.; Gleason, M.; McCullar, V.; Yun, G.H.; Cooley, S.; Verneris, M.R.; McGlave, P.B.; Miller, J.S. Natural Killer Cell Killing of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Blasts by Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor–Negative Natural Killer Cells after NKG2A and LIR-1 Blockade. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010, 16, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Braud, V.M.; Allan, D.S.J.; O’Callaghan, C.A.; Söderström, K.; D’Andrea, A.; Ogg, G.S.; Lazetic, S.; Young, N.T.; Bell, J.I.; Phillips, J.H.; et al. HLA-E binds to natural killer cell receptors CD94/NKG2A, B and C. Nature 1998, 391, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lee, N.; Llano, M.; Carretero, M.; Ishitani, A.; Navarro, F.; Lopez-Botet, M.; Geraghty, D.E. HLA-E is a major ligand for the natural killer inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 5199–5204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ulbrecht, M.; Martinozzi, S.; Grzeschik, M.; Hengel, H.; Ellwart, J.W.; Pla, M.; Weiss, E.H. Cutting Edge: The Human Cytomegalovirus UL40 Gene Product Contains a Ligand for HLA-E and Prevents NK Cell-Mediated Lysis. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 5019–5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Haanen, J.B.; Cerundolo, V. NKG2A, a New Kid on the Immune Checkpoint Block. Cell 2018, 175, 1720–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Creelan, B.C.; Antonia, S.J. The NKG2A immune checkpoint—A new direction in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 16, 277–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. McGranahan, N.; Rosenthal, R.; Hiley, C.T.; Rowan, A.J.; Watkins, T.B.K.; Wilson, G.A.; Birkbak, N.J.; Veeriah, S.; Van Loo, P.; Herrero, J.; et al. Allele-Specific HLA Loss and Immune Escape in Lung Cancer Evolution. Cell 2017, 171, 1259–1271.e1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Algarra, I.; Garcia-Lora, A.; Cabrera, T.; Ruiz-Cabello, F.; Garrido, F. The selection of tumor variants with altered expression of classical and nonclassical MHC class I molecules: Implications for tumor immune escape. Cancer Immunol. Immunother 2004, 53, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Marchesi, M.; Andersson, E.; Villabona, L.; Seliger, B.; Lundqvist, A.; Kiessling, R.; Masucci, G.V. HLA-dependent tumour development: A role for tumour associate macrophages? J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Gustafson, K.S.; Ginder, G.D. Interferon-γ Induction of the Human Leukocyte Antigen-E Gene Is Mediated through Binding of a Complex Containing STAT1α to a Distinct Interferon-γ-responsive Element. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 20035–20046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Yazdi, M.T.; van Riet, S.; van Schadewijk, A.; Fiocco, M.; van Hall, T.; Taube, C.; Hiemstra, P.S.; van der burg, S.H. The positive prognostic effect of stromal CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells is restrained by the expression of HLA-E in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 3477–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Wolpert, F.; Roth, P.; Lamszus, K.; Tabatabai, G.; Weller, M.; Eisele, G. HLA-E contributes to an immune-inhibitory phenotype of glioblastoma stem-like cells. J. Neuroimmunol. 2012, 250, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. De Kruijf, E.M.; Sajet, A.; van Nes, J.G.H.; Natanov, R.; Putter, H.; Smit, V.T.H.B.M.; Liefers, G.J.; van den Elsen, P.J.; van de Velde, C.J.H.; Kuppen, P.J.K. HLA-E and HLA-G Expression in Classical HLA Class I-Negative Tumors Is of Prognostic Value for Clinical Outcome of Early Breast Cancer Patients. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 7452–7459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Sun, C.; Xu, J.; Huang, Q.; Huang, M.; Wen, H.; Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Song, J.; Zheng, M.; Sun, H.; et al. High NKG2A expression contributes to NK cell exhaustion and predicts a poor prognosis of patients with liver cancer. OncoImmunology 2017, 6, e1264562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Seliger, B.; Jasinski-Bergner, S.; Quandt, D.; Stoehr, C.; Bukur, J.; Wach, S.; Legal, W.; Taubert, H.; Wullich, B.; Hartmann, A. HLA-E expression and its clinical relevance in human renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 67360–67372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Gooden, M.; Lampen, M.; Jordanova, E.S.; Leffers, N.; Trimbos, J.B.; van der Burg, S.H.; Nijman, H.; van Hall, T. HLA-E expression by gynecological cancers restrains tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 10656–10661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Levy, E.M.; Bianchini, M.; Von Euw, E.M.; Barrio, M.M.; Bravo, A.I.; Furman, D.; Domenichini, E.; Macagno, C.; Pinsky, V.; Zucchini, C.; et al. Human leukocyte antigen-E protein is overexpressed in primary human colorectal cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2008, 32, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Borst, L.; van der Burg, S.H.; van Hall, T. The NKG2A–HLA-E Axis as a Novel Checkpoint in the Tumor Microenvironment. Clin. Cancer. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kamiya, T.; Seow, S.V.; Wong, D.; Robinson, M.; Campana, D. Blocking expression of inhibitory receptor NKG2A overcomes tumor resistance to NK cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 2094–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Werfel, T.A.; Elion, D.L.; Rahman, B.; Hicks, D.J.; Sanchez, V.; Gonzales-Ericsson, P.I.; Nixon, M.J.; James, J.L.; Balko, J.M.; Scherle, P.A.; et al. Treatment-Induced Tumor Cell Apoptosis and Secondary Necrosis Drive Tumor Progression in the Residual Tumor Microenvironment through MerTK and IDO1. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Gillard-Bocquet, M.; Caer, C.; Cagnard, N.; Crozet, L.; Perez, M.; Fridman, W.H.; Sautès-Fridman, C.; Cremer, I. Lung Tumor Microenvironment Induces Specific Gene Expression Signature in Intratumoral NK Cells. Front. Immun. 2013, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Mamessier, E.; Sylvain, A.; Thibult, M.-L.; Houvenaeghel, G.; Jacquemier, J.; Castellano, R.; Gonçalves, A.; André, P.; Romagné, F.; Thibault, G.; et al. Human breast cancer cells enhance self tolerance by promoting evasion from NK cell antitumor immunity. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 3609–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Pesce, S.; Tabellini, G.; Cantoni, C.; Patrizi, O.; Coltrini, D.; Rampinelli, F.; Matta, J.; Vivier, E.; Moretta, A.; Parolini, S.; et al. B7-H6-mediated downregulation of NKp30 in NK cells contributes to ovarian carcinoma immune escape. OncoImmunology 2015, 4, e1001224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Masilamani, M.; Nguyen, C.; Kabat, J.; Borrego, F.; Coligan, J.E. CD94/NKG2A Inhibits NK Cell Activation by Disrupting the Actin Network at the Immunological Synapse. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 3590–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Stringaris, K.; Sekine, T.; Khoder, A.; Alsuliman, A.; Razzaghi, B.; Sargeant, R.; Pavlu, J.; Brisley, G.; de Lavallade, H.; Sarvaria, A.; et al. Leukemia-induced phenotypic and functional defects in natural killer cells predict failure to achieve remission in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2014, 99, 836–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Zaghi, E.; Calvi, M.; Marcenaro, E.; Mavilio, D.; Di Vito, C. Targeting NKG2A to elucidate natural killer cell ontogenesis and to develop novel immune-therapeutic strategies in cancer therapy. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 105, 1243–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Khan, M.; Arooj, S.; Wang, H. NK Cell-Based Immune Checkpoint Inhibition. Front. Immun. 2020, 11, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Workman, C.J.; Dugger, K.J.; Vignali, D.A.A. Cutting edge: Molecular analysis of the negative regulatory function of lymphocyte activation gene-3. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 5392–5395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. He, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhao, C.; Li, X.; Zhou, C.; Hirsch, F.R. TIM-3, a promising target for cancer immunotherapy. Onco. Targets 2018, 11, 7005–7009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Folgiero, V.; Cifaldi, L.; Li Pira, G.; Goffredo, B.M.; Vinti, L.; Locatelli, F. TIM-3/Gal-9 interaction induces IFNγ-dependent IDO1 expression in acute myeloid leukemia blast cells. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2015, 8, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Li, H.; Wu, K.; Tao, K.; Chen, L.; Zheng, Q.; Lu, X.; Liu, J.; Shi, L.; Liu, C.; Wang, G.; et al. Tim-3/galectin-9 signaling pathway mediates T-cell dysfunction and predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2012, 56, 1342–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ji, P.; Chen, D.; Bian, J.; Xia, R.; Song, X.; Wen, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y. Up-regulation of TIM-3 on CD4+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes predicts poor prognosis in human non-small-cell lung cancer. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi 2015, 31, 808–811. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Nebbia, G.; Peppa, D.; Schurich, A.; Khanna, P.; Singh, H.D.; Cheng, Y.; Rosenberg, W.; Dusheiko, G.; Gilson, R.; ChinAleong, J.; et al. Upregulation of the Tim-3/galectin-9 pathway of T cell exhaustion in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhu, C.; Anderson, A.C.; Schubart, A.; Xiong, H.; Imitola, J.; Khoury, S.J.; Zheng, X.X.; Strom, T.B.; Kuchroo, V.K. The Tim-3 ligand galectin-9 negatively regulates T helper type 1 immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Nakayama, M.; Akiba, H.; Takeda, K.; Kojima, Y.; Hashiguchi, M.; Azuma, M.; Yagita, H.; Okumura, K. Tim-3 mediates phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and cross-presentation. Blood 2009, 113, 3821–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. DeKruyff, R.H.; Bu, X.; Ballesteros, A.; Santiago, C.; Chim, Y.-L.E.; Lee, H.-H.; Karisola, P.; Pichavant, M.; Kaplan, G.G.; Umetsu, D.T.; et al. T cell/transmembrane, Ig, and mucin-3 allelic variants differentially recognize phosphatidylserine and mediate phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 1918–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Gao, X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, G.; Huang, H.; Zhang, G.; Wang, F.; Sun, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Lu, B. TIM-3 expression characterizes regulatory T cells in tumor tissues and is associated with lung cancer progression. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Golden-Mason, L.; McMahan, R.H.; Strong, M.; Reisdorph, R.; Mahaffey, S.; Palmer, B.E.; Cheng, L.; Kulesza, C.; Hirashima, M.; Niki, T.; et al. Galectin-9 functionally impairs natural killer cells in humans and mice. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 4835–4845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Finney, C.A.M.; Ayi, K.; Wasmuth, J.D.; Sheth, P.M.; Kaul, R.; Loutfy, M.; Kain, K.C.; Serghides, L. HIV infection deregulates Tim-3 expression on innate cells: Combination antiretroviral therapy results in partial restoration. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2013, 63, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gleason, M.K.; Lenvik, T.R.; McCullar, V.; Felices, M.; O’Brien, M.S.; Cooley, S.A.; Verneris, M.R.; Cichocki, F.; Holman, C.J.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; et al. Tim-3 is an inducible human natural killer cell receptor that enhances interferon gamma production in response to galectin-9. Blood 2012, 119, 3064–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ndhlovu, L.C.; Lopez-Vergès, S.; Barbour, J.D.; Jones, R.B.; Jha, A.R.; Long, B.R.; Schoeffler, E.C.; Fujita, T.; Nixon, D.F.; Lanier, L.L. Tim-3 marks human natural killer cell maturation and suppresses cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Blood 2012, 119, 3734–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Komita, H.; Koido, S.; Hayashi, K.; Kan, S.; Ito, M.; Kamata, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Homma, S. Expression of immune checkpoint molecules of T cell immunoglobulin and mucin protein 3/galectin-9 for NK cell suppression in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 34, 2099–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ju, Y.; Hou, N.; Meng, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, L.; Sun, W.; et al. T cell immunoglobulin- and mucin-domain-containing molecule-3 (Tim-3) mediates natural killer cell suppression in chronic hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2010, 52, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. De Sousa Linhares, A.; Leitner, J.; Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, K.; Steinberger, P. Not All Immune Checkpoints Are Created Equal. Front. Immun. 2018, 9, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Jin, H.-T.; Anderson, A.C.; Tan, W.G.; West, E.E.; Ha, S.-J.; Araki, K.; Freeman, G.J.; Kuchroo, V.K.; Ahmed, R. Cooperation of Tim-3 and PD-1 in CD8 T-cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 14733–14738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Fourcade, J.; Sun, Z.; Benallaoua, M.; Guillaume, P.; Luescher, I.F.; Sander, C.; Kirkwood, J.M.; Kuchroo, V.; Zarour, H.M. Upregulation of Tim-3 and PD-1 expression is associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell dysfunction in melanoma patients. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 2175–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Linedale, R.; Schmidt, C.; King, B.T.; Ganko, A.G.; Simpson, F.; Panizza, B.J.; Leggatt, G.R. Elevated frequencies of CD8 T cells expressing PD-1, CTLA-4 and Tim-3 within tumour from perineural squamous cell carcinoma patients. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Liu, F.; Zeng, G.; Zhou, S.; He, X.; Sun, N.; Zhu, X.; Hu, A. Blocking Tim-3 or/and PD-1 reverses dysfunction of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Bull Cancer 2018, 105, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shen, H.; Sheng, H.; Lu, J.J.; Feng, C.; Yao, M.; Pan, H.; Xu, L.S.; Shen, J.F.; Zheng, Y.; Zhou, Y.L. Expression and distribution of programmed death receptor 1 and T cell immunoglobulin mucin 3 in breast cancer microenvironment and its relationship with clinicopathological features. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2018, 98, 1352–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Anderson, A.C.; Joller, N.; Kuchroo, V.K. Lag-3, Tim-3, and TIGIT: Co-inhibitory Receptors with Specialized Functions in Immune Regulation. Immunity 2016, 44, 989–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Nishiwada, S.; Sho, M.; Yasuda, S.; Shimada, K.; Yamato, I.; Akahori, T.; Kinoshita, S.; Nagai, M.; Konishi, N.; Nakajima, Y. Clinical significance of CD155 expression in human pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 2287–2297. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Triebel, F.; Jitsukawa, S.; Baixeras, E.; Roman-Roman, S.; Genevee, C.; Viegas-Pequignot, E.; Hercend, T. LAG-3, a novel lymphocyte activation gene closely related to CD4. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 171, 1393–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Wang, J.; Sanmamed, M.F.; Datar, I.; Su, T.T.; Ji, L.; Sun, J.; Chen, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, G.; Yin, W.; et al. Fibrinogen-like Protein 1 Is a Major Immune Inhibitory Ligand of LAG-3. Cell 2019, 176, 334–347.e312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Demeure, C.E.; Wolfers, J.; Martin-Garcia, N.; Gaulard, P.; Triebel, F. T Lymphocytes infiltrating various tumour types express the MHC class II ligand lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3): Role of LAG-3/MHC class II interactions in cell-cell contacts. Eur. J. Cancer 2001, 37, 1709–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Huang, C.-T.; Workman, C.J.; Flies, D.; Pan, X.; Marson, A.L.; Zhou, G.; Hipkiss, E.L.; Ravi, S.; Kowalski, J.; Levitsky, H.I.; et al. Role of LAG-3 in regulatory T cells. Immunity 2004, 21, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Juno, J.A.; Stalker, A.T.; Waruk, J.L.; Oyugi, J.; Kimani, M.; Plummer, F.A.; Kimani, J.; Fowke, K.R. Elevated expression of LAG-3, but not PD-1, is associated with impaired iNKT cytokine production during chronic HIV-1 infection and treatment. Retrovirology 2015, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Kisielow, M.; Kisielow, J.; Capoferri-Sollami, G.; Karjalainen, K. Expression of lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) on B cells is induced by T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005, 35, 2081–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Andreae, S.; Buisson, S.; Triebel, F. MHC class II signal transduction in human dendritic cells induced by a natural ligand, the LAG-3 protein (CD223). Blood 2003, 102, 2130–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Baixeras, E.; Huard, B.; Miossec, C.; Jitsukawa, S.; Martin, M.; Hercend, T.; Auffray, C.; Triebel, F.; Piatier-Tonneau, D. Characterization of the lymphocyte activation gene 3-encoded protein. A new ligand for human leukocyte antigen class II antigens. J. Exp. Med. 1992, 176, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Huard, B.; Prigent, P.; Tournier, M.; Bruniquel, D.; Triebel, F. CD4/major histocompatibility complex class II interaction analyzed with CD4- and lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3)-Ig fusion proteins. Eur. J. Immunol. 1995, 25, 2718–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Sun, H.; Sun, C.; Xiao, W. Expression regulation of co-inhibitory molecules on human natural killer cells in response to cytokine stimulations. Cytokine 2014, 65, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Xu, F.; Liu, J.; Liu, D.; Liu, B.; Wang, M.; Hu, Z.; Du, X.; Tang, L.; He, F. LSECtin expressed on melanoma cells promotes tumor progression by inhibiting antitumor T-cell responses. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 3418–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Bradshaw, W.E.; Holzapfel, C.M. Interaction between photoperiod, temperature, and chilling in dormant larvae of the tree-hole mosquito, Toxorhynchites rutilus Coq. Biol. Bull. 1977, 152, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Maçon-Lemaître, L.; Triebel, F. The negative regulatory function of the lymphocyte-activation gene-3 co-receptor (CD223) on human T cells. Immunology 2005, 115, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Blackburn, S.D.; Shin, H.; Haining, W.N.; Zou, T.; Workman, C.J.; Polley, A.; Betts, M.R.; Freeman, G.J.; Vignali, D.A.A.; Wherry, E.J. Coregulation of CD8+ T cell exhaustion by multiple inhibitory receptors during chronic viral infection. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Camisaschi, C.; Casati, C.; Rini, F.; Perego, M.; De Filippo, A.; Triebel, F.; Parmiani, G.; Belli, F.; Rivoltini, L.; Castelli, C. LAG-3 expression defines a subset of CD4(+)CD25(high)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells that are expanded at tumor sites. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 6545–6551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Woo, S.-R.; Turnis, M.E.; Goldberg, M.V.; Bankoti, J.; Selby, M.; Nirschl, C.J.; Bettini, M.L.; Gravano, D.M.; Vogel, P.; Liu, C.L.; et al. Immune inhibitory molecules LAG-3 and PD-1 synergistically regulate T-cell function to promote tumoral immune escape. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Lanuza, P.M.; Pesini, C.; Arias, M.A.; Calvo, C.; Ramirez-Labrada, A.; Pardo, J. Recalling the Biological Significance of Immune Checkpoints on NK Cells: A Chance to Overcome LAG3, PD1, and CTLA4 Inhibitory Pathways by Adoptive NK Cell Transfer? Front. Immun. 2020, 10, 3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Merino, A.; Zhang, B.; Dougherty, P.; Luo, X.; Wang, J.; Blazar, B.R.; Miller, J.S.; Cichocki, F. Chronic stimulation drives human NK cell dysfunction and epigenetic reprograming. J. Clin. Invest. 2019, 129, 3770–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Brignone, C.; Grygar, C.; Marcu, M.; Schäkel, K.; Triebel, F. A soluble form of lymphocyte activation gene-3 (IMP321) induces activation of a large range of human effector cytotoxic cells. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 4202–4211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Brignone, C.; Escudier, B.; Grygar, C.; Marcu, M.; Triebel, F. A phase I pharmacokinetic and biological correlative study of IMP321, a novel MHC class II agonist, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 6225–6231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Brignone, C.; Gutierrez, M.; Mefti, F.; Brain, E.; Jarcau, R.; Cvitkovic, F.; Bousetta, N.; Medioni, J.; Gligorov, J.; Grygar, C.; et al. First-line chemoimmunotherapy in metastatic breast carcinoma: Combination of paclitaxel and IMP321 (LAG-3Ig) enhances immune responses and antitumor activity. J. Transl. Med. 2010, 8, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Shih, H.-Y.; Sciumè, G.; Mikami, Y.; Guo, L.; Sun, H.-W.; Brooks, S.R.; Urban, J.F.; Davis, F.P.; Kanno, Y.; O’Shea, J.J. Developmental Acquisition of Regulomes Underlies Innate Lymphoid Cell Functionality. Cell 2016, 165, 1120–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Ercolano, G.; Wyss, T.; Salomé, B.; Romero, P.; Trabanelli, S.; Jandus, C. Distinct and shared gene expression for human innate versus adaptive helper lymphoid cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020, 108, 723–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Li, S.; Morita, H.; Sokolowska, M.; Tan, G.; Boonpiyathad, T.; Opitz, L.; Orimo, K.; Archer, S.K.; Jansen, K.; Tang, M.L.K.; et al. Gene expression signatures of circulating human type 1, 2, and 3 innate lymphoid cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 143, 2321–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Yu, Y.; Tsang, J.C.H.; Wang, C.; Clare, S.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Brandt, C.; Kane, L.; Campos, L.S.; Lu, L.; et al. Single-cell RNA-seq identifies a PD-1hi ILC progenitor and defines its development pathway. Nature 2016, 539, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Seillet, C.; Mielke, L.A.; Amann-Zalcenstein, D.B.; Su, S.; Gao, J.; Almeida, F.F.; Shi, W.; Ritchie, M.E.; Naik, S.H.; Huntington, N.D.; et al. Deciphering the Innate Lymphoid Cell Transcriptional Program. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Taylor, S.; Huang, Y.; Mallett, G.; Stathopoulou, C.; Felizardo, T.C.; Sun, M.-A.; Martin, E.L.; Zhu, N.; Woodward, E.L.; Elias, M.S.; et al. PD-1 regulates KLRG1+ group 2 innate lymphoid cells. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 1663–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Batyrova, B.; Luwaert, F.; Maravelia, P.; Miyabayashi, Y.; Vashist, N.; Stark, J.M.; Soori, S.Y.; Tibbitt, C.A.; Riese, P.; Coquet, J.M.; et al. PD-1 expression affects cytokine production by ILC2 and is influenced by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2020, 8, 8–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Oldenhove, G.; Boucquey, E.; Taquin, A.; Acolty, V.; Bonetti, L.; Ryffel, B.; Le Bert, M.; Englebert, K.; Boon, L.; Moser, M. PD-1 Is Involved in the Dysregulation of Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in a Murine Model of Obesity. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 2053–2060.e2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Helou, D.G.; Shafiei-Jahani, P.; Lo, R.; Howard, E.; Hurrell, B.P.; Galle-Treger, L.; Painter, J.D.; Lewis, G.; Soroosh, P.; Sharpe, A.H.; et al. PD-1 pathway regulates ILC2 metabolism and PD-1 agonist treatment ameliorates airway hyperreactivity. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Moral, J.A.; Leung, J.; Rojas, L.A.; Ruan, J.; Zhao, J.; Sethna, Z.; Ramnarain, A.; Gasmi, B.; Gururajan, M.; Redmond, D.; et al. ILC2s amplify PD-1 blockade by activating tissue-specific cancer immunity. Nature 2020, 579, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Gao, Y.; Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes, F.; Bald, T.; Ng, S.S.; Young, A.; Ngiow, S.F.; Rautela, J.; Straube, J.; Waddell, N.; Blake, S.J.; et al. Tumor immunoevasion by the conversion of effector NK cells into type 1 innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 1004–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Huang, Y.; Guo, L.; Qiu, J.; Chen, X.; Hu-Li, J.; Siebenlist, U.; Williamson, P.R.; Urban, J.F.; Paul, W.E. IL-25-responsive, lineage-negative KLRG1(hi) cells are multipotential ’inflammatory’ type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Bauché, D.; Joyce-Shaikh, B.; Jain, R.; Grein, J.; Ku, K.S.; Blumenschein, W.M.; Ganal-Vonarburg, S.C.; Wilson, D.C.; McClanahan, T.K.; Malefyt, R.D.W.; et al. LAG3+ Regulatory T Cells Restrain Interleukin-23-Producing CX3CR1+ Gut-Resident Macrophages during Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cell-Driven Colitis. Immunity 2018, 49, 342–352.e345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Schuijs, M.J.; Png, S.; Richard, A.C.; Tsyben, A.; Hamm, G.; Stockis, J.; Garcia, C.; Pinaud, S.; Nicholls, A.; Ros, X.R.; et al. ILC2-driven innate immune checkpoint mechanism antagonizes NK cell antimetastatic function in the lung. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 998–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Pesce, S.; Thoren, F.B.; Cantoni, C.; Prato, C.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A.; Marcenaro, E. The Innate Immune Cross Talk between NK Cells and Eosinophils Is Regulated by the Interaction of Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors with Eosinophil Surface Ligands. Front. Immun. 2017, 8, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cancers 12 03504 g001 550
Figure 1. IC expression on NK cells/ILCs in healthy and pathological conditions.
Figure 1. IC expression on NK cells/ILCs in healthy and pathological conditions.
Cancers 12 03504 g001
Table
Table 1. Current evidence of immune checkpoint expressed in innate lymphocytes and their involvement in cancer immunotherapy.
Table 1. Current evidence of immune checkpoint expressed in innate lymphocytes and their involvement in cancer immunotherapy.
ReceptorCell TypemAbs Used in Clinical TrialTissue/Tumor InvolvementClinical Trial Number/PhaseRecruitment Information
PD-1NKSeveral anti-PD-1 mAbs, reviewed in [25] Solid tumors, including Kaposi sarcoma, PC, ovarian and lung cancers [26,27,28,29,30], and HL [31]
Use of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 improves the anti-tumor activity of NK cells against PD-L1/2+ tumor cells [25,26,31,32]
ILC Decidual ILCs during pregnancy [17]
Tumor-associated ILC2s (>PD-1 than circulating ILCs) [33]
ILC2s and ILC3s in tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (>PD-1 than in the paralesional tissue)
ILC3s in human malignant pleural effusion [30]
ILC2s in colorectal cancer model [33]
KIRsNKMonotherapy with IPH2102 (lirilumab) Solid tumors, hematologic malignancies,
all pediatric tumor types [34]
IPH2102 combined with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab)Bladder cancerNCT03532451
phase 1		43 participants
(active)
SCCHN NCT03341936
phase 2		58 participants
(active/recruiting)
Advanced solid tumors NCT03203876
phase 1		21 participants
(active)
LeukemiaNCT02599649
phase 2		10 participants
(terminated/results)
HL, NHL, MMNCT01592370
Phase 1/2		375 participants
(active)
IPH2102 combined with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab)+
anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab)		Advanced solid tumorsNCT01714739
Phase 1/2		337 participants
(completed)
Advanced solid tumorsNCT03347123
Phase 1/2		11 participants
(active)
IPH2102 combined with anti-CS1 (elotuzumab)MMNCT02252263
Phase 1		44 participants
(completed)
IPH2102 combined with anti-CD20 (rituximab) CLLNCT02481297
phase 2		7 participants
(completed/results)
Monotherapy with
1-7F9		MMNCT00552396
phase 1		32 participants
(completed/results)
IPH2102 combined with azacytidineAMLNCT02399917
phase 2		36 participants
(terminated/results)
MDSNCT02599649
phase 2		10 participants
(terminated/results)
NKG2ANKMonotherapy with IPH2201 (monalizumab) [35]Gynecologic cancersNCT02459301
phase 1		59 participants
(completed)
IPH2201 combined with anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) [36]NSCLC NCT03822351
phase 2		189 participants
(active)
NSCLC NCT03833440
phase2		120 participants (recruiting)
NSCLC NCT03794544
phase 2		80 participants
(active)
MSS-CRCNCT04145193
phase 2		Withdrawn
Advanced solid tumorsNCT02671435
phase 1/2		383 participants
(active)
IPH2201 combined with anti-EGFR (cetuximab)
or with anti-EGFR +anti-PD-L1		SCCHNNCT02643550
phase 1/2		140 participants
(recruiting)
IPH2201 combined with anti-Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (ibrutinib)CLLNCT02557516
phase 1/2		22 participants
(terminated/results)
ILC AML [37]
TIM-3NK Gastric cancer [38]
Lung adenocarcinoma [39]
Advanced melanoma [40]
Bladder cancer [38,39,40,41]
Sym023Metastatic cancer, solid tumor, lymphomasNCT03489343
phase 1		24 participants
(completed)
Sym023 combined with anti-PD-1 or anti-LAG-3 NCT03311412
phase 1		102 participants
(recruiting)
TSR-022 combine with anti-PD-1Advanced solid tumorsNCT02817633
phase 1		369
participants (recruiting)
TSR-022 combine with anti-PD-1NCT04139902
phase 2		56 participants
(recruiting)
TSR-022 combine with anti-PD-1Primary liver cancerNCT03680508
phase 2		42 participants
(recruiting)
BMS-986016 (relatlimab) combined with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab)ChordomaNCT03623854
phase 2		20 participants
(recruiting)
Metastatic uveal melanoma NCT04552223
phase 2		27 participants
(recruiting)
MelanomaNCT03743766
phase 2		42 participants
(recruiting)
BGB-A425 combined with anti-PD-1Advanced or metastatic solid tumorsNCT03744468
phase 1/2		162 participants
(recruiting)
Monotherapy with MBG453Advanced malignanciesNCT02608268
phase 1/2		252 participants
(active)
AML or high risk MDSNCT03066648
phase 1		235 participants
(recruiting)
ILC TIM-3+ ILC3s were found in the decidua [17]
TIGITNK Colon cancer patients and tumor models [42]
TIGIT blocking was suggested as a potent strategy to increase graft versus leukemia effect in alloSCT in AML [43]
Tiragolumab combined with anti-PD-1 (atezolizumab)Cervical cancerNCT04300647
phase 2		160 participants
(recruiting)
Esophageal squamous cell carcinomaNCT04543617
phase 3		750 participants
(recruiting)
SCLCNCT04256421
phase 3		400 participants
(recruiting)
NSCLCNCT04513925
phase 3		800 participants
(recruiting)
NCT03563716 phase 2135 participants (active)
Esophageal CancerNCT04540211
phase 3		450 participants
(recruiting)
NCT03281369
phase 1/2		410 participants
(recruiting)
Urothelial carcinoma NCT03869190
phase 1/2		385 participants
(recruiting)
Pancreatic adenocarcinomaNCT03193190
phase 1/2		290 participants
(recruiting)
Advanced metastatic tumors NCT02794571
phase 1		400 participants
(recruiting)
Tiragolumab combined with anti-VEGF (bevacizumab)Advanced liver cancerNCT04524871
phase 1/2		100 participants
(recruiting)
Monotherapy with BMS-986207 or
combined with anti-LAG-3		MMNCT04150965
phase 1/2		104 participants
(recruiting)
BMS-986207 combined with nivolumabOvarian cancer, endometrial neoplasmas, solid tumorNCT04570839
phase 1/2		100 participants
(recruiting)
Monotherapy with OMP-313M32
or combined with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab)		Advanced and metastatic cancerNCT03119428
phase 1		33 participants
(terminated)
Monotherapy with AB154
or combined with anti-PD-1 (zimberelimab)		Advanced solid tumors NCT03628677
phase 1		66 participants
(recruiting)
Lung cancerNCT04262856
phase 2		150 participants
(recruiting)
ILC ILC1 and splenic ILC3 [44]
LAG-3NNK Monotherapy with Sym022Metastatic cancer, solid tumor, and lymphomaNCT03489369
phase 1		15 participants
(completed)
Monotherapy with BMS-986016 (relatlimab) or combined with anti-PD-1Brain neoplasms, glioblastoma, gliosarcoma NCT02658981
phase 1		63 participants
(active)
Solid tumorsNCT01968109
phase 1/2		1500 participants
(recruiting)
NCT03470922
phase 2/3		700 participants
(recruiting)
SCCHNNCT04080804
phase 2		60 participants
(recruiting)
MK-4280 combined with anti-PD-1Solid tumorsNCT02720068
phase 1		576 participants
(recruiting)
Hematologic malignanciesNCT03598608
phase 1/2		134 participants
(recruiting)
Monotherapy with TSR-033 or combined with anti-PD-1Advanced solid tumorsNCT03250832
phase 1		55 participants
(recruiting)
Monotherapy with LAG525 or combined with anti-PD-1Advanced solid tumors NCT02460224
phase 1/2		490 participants
(active)
NCT03499899 phase 288 participants (active)
NCT03484923
phase 2		195 participants
(recruiting)
Solid and hematologic malignancies NCT03365791
phase 2		76 participants
(completed)
Monotherapy with REGN3767 or combined with anti-PD-1Advanced malignancies NCT03005782
phase 1		669 participants
(recruiting)
Monotherapy with IMP321 (eftilagimod alpha) or combined with chemotherapy Melanoma [45] NCT02676869
phase 1		24 participants
(completed)
Metastatic breast cancer NCT00349934
phase 1		33 participants
(completed)
IMP321 (eftilagimod alpha) combined with anti-PD-1NSCLC and SCCHN NCT03625323
phase 2		109 participants
(recruiting)
ILC LAG-3 upregulated upon tumor conversion from NKs to ILC1s [46]
KLRG1ILC KLRG1 protein expressed from ILC3s isolated from first trimester decidual tissue [17] and in a subset of ILC2s in vivo expanded with IL-25 [47]
KLRG1 transcripts identified in ILC2s in lung and colorectal cancer [20]
CTLA-4ILC Expression of CTLA-4 in tumor associated ILC1s and ILC2s [33,46]
AML: acute myeloid leukemia; CLL: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; mAb: monoclonal antibody; MDS: myelodisplastic syndrome; MM: multiple myeloma; MSS-CRC: microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; PC: peritoneal carcinomatosis; SCCHN: squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; SCLC: small cell lung cancer.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pesce, S.; Trabanelli, S.; Di Vito, C.; Greppi, M.; Obino, V.; Guolo, F.; Minetto, P.; Bozzo, M.; Calvi, M.; Zaghi, E.; et al. Cancer Immunotherapy by Blocking Immune Checkpoints on Innate Lymphocytes. Cancers 2020, 12, 3504. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123504

AMA Style

Pesce S, Trabanelli S, Di Vito C, Greppi M, Obino V, Guolo F, Minetto P, Bozzo M, Calvi M, Zaghi E, et al. Cancer Immunotherapy by Blocking Immune Checkpoints on Innate Lymphocytes. Cancers. 2020; 12(12):3504. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pesce, Silvia, Sara Trabanelli, Clara Di Vito, Marco Greppi, Valentina Obino, Fabio Guolo, Paola Minetto, Matteo Bozzo, Michela Calvi, Elisa Zaghi, and et al. 2020. "Cancer Immunotherapy by Blocking Immune Checkpoints on Innate Lymphocytes" Cancers 12, no. 12: 3504. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop