Next Article in Journal
Oncolytic Adenovirus in Cancer Immunotherapy
Previous Article in Journal
BH3 Mimetics for the Treatment of B-Cell Malignancies—Insights and Lessons from the Clinic
Previous Article in Special Issue
HOX Genes Family and Cancer: A Novel Role for Homeobox B9 in the Resistance to Anti-Angiogenic Therapies
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Physiological Roles of ERM Proteins and Transcriptional Regulators in Supporting Membrane Expression of Efflux Transporters as Factors of Drug Resistance in Cancer

Cancers 2020, 12(11), 3352; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113352
by Takuo Ogihara 1,*, Kenta Mizoi 2, Hiroki Kamioka 1 and Kentaro Yano 2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Cancers 2020, 12(11), 3352; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113352
Submission received: 20 October 2020 / Revised: 6 November 2020 / Accepted: 10 November 2020 / Published: 12 November 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper provides a review of the role of ERM proteins in the regulation of activity and cellular localization of ABC-family membrane transporters. The role of ERM proteins in the regulation of the activity of ABC proteins is not a very popular research topic, therefore the publication gives the impression that the authors do not go too deep into the description of the mechanisms. On the other hand, the work may inspire MDR researchers to focus their attention on the role of ERM proteins in the process of drug resistance. The work is written very clearly and it is easy to read. I believe the paper is a valuable source of knowledge and may be published in Cancers.

Author Response

Thank you for your input. Please refer to the opinions of other reviewers.

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript „Physiological Roles of ERM Proteins and Transcriptional Regulators in Supporting Membrane Expression of Efflux Transporters as Factors of Drug Resistance in Cancer” describes the role of three proteins, ezrin (Ezr), radixin (Rdx) and moesin (Msn) in function of ABC transporters. The other point of the manuscript is concentrated on desciption of contribution of EMT into P-gp activity. The manuscript is well written. I propose to include description of EZR proteins, ezrin, radixin and moesion in body text. If it will be possible the authors could summarize the role ERM in table. 

Author Response

Thank you for your comment. Following your suggestions, we have added several sentences, one reference and tables, so please check them.

 

P3L22-P4L7

The general role of the ERM proteins is to cross-link between proteins located on plasma membranes and cortical actin filaments. ERM proteins bind to integral membrane proteins, scaffold proteins, and Rho-related proteins (Table 1) [58].

Table 1  Proteins which bind to the FERM domains

Membrane proteins

 

CD44

 

CD43

 

CD95 (APO-1/Fas)

 

Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)

 

Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-2)

 

L-selectin

 

MRP2

 

Na+,H+-exchanger (NHE1)

 

Na+ K+ 2Cl-cotransporter (NKCC2)

 

P-gp

Scaffoerd proteins

 

NHERF1 (EBP-50)

 

NHERF2

 

NHERF3

Rho-relate3 proteins

 

Dbl

 

Rho-GDP-dissociation inhibitor (Rho-GDI)

This table is modified from Table 1 quoted in the paper [58].

 

P13L23-24

  1. Kawaguchi, K.; Yoshida, S.; Hatano, R.; Asano, S.; Pathophysiological Roles of Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin Proteins. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 40, 381-390.

 

Reviewer 3 Report

In this review article, the authors summarized recent findings of the role of ERM proteins and transcriptional regulators in cancer. In particular, they focused on the relationship between efflux transporters and scaffold proteins, and between ERM scaffold proteins and the transcriptional regulatory factors induce their expression. This review brings together a wide body of information that may be of use for researchers interested in this field. My specific comment for this manuscript is listed below.

1. In Table 1, the column name “Transporter” should be “Organs” or “Tissues”. It will help readers to understand their meanings at a glance.

Author Response

Thank you for your advice. We have amended the Table 1, so please check it.

Back to TopTop