Next Article in Journal
Piezoelectric Energy Harvester with Zigzag Root Section for Self-Powered Transformer Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in the Design, Modeling, and Control of Flexure-Based Nanopositioning Stages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Graphene Oxide Particle Size on the Enzymatic Synthesis of Polyaniline Films
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interfacial Engineering of Co3O4@MXene for Superior Charge Storage: A Route to High-Capacitance Supercapacitors

Graduate School of Flexible and Printable Electronics, LANL-JBNU Engineering Institute-Korea, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(12), 1313; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16121313
Submission received: 30 September 2025 / Revised: 14 November 2025 / Accepted: 19 November 2025 / Published: 24 November 2025

Abstract

We report an interracially engineered Co3O4@Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid as a high-rate charge-storage electrode. Low-temperature assembly under inert conditions preserves the MXene carbide while anchoring nanocrystalline Co3O4 on conductive, ion-permeable sheets. XRD and FTIR confirm the structural integrity of MXene without TiO2 formation. Electrochemically, cyclic voltammetry, Dunn analysis, and galvanostatic tests reveal mixed storage with a dominant pseudocapacitive contribution, while EIS fitting shows reduced charge-transfer resistance for the hybrid compared with either parent. Within a 0.6 V window in 2 M KOH, the composite delivers high specific charge and excellent rate retention, attributable to shortened diffusion paths and fast electron transport at the oxide–MXene interface. These results establish Co3O4@MXene as a robust, mechanism-consistent platform for high-power supercapacitors.

1. Introduction

The growing global energy demand and the integration of renewable energy sources have created an urgent need for reliable, sustainable, and high-performance energy storage technologies [1,2]. Supercapacitors (SCs) have attracted significant attention because of their high power density, rapid charge–discharge rates, and long cycling stability compared to conventional batteries [3,4]. However, their relatively low energy density limits their practical use in applications that require both high power and high energy output. Therefore, considerable research efforts are devoted to the rational design of advanced electrode materials that can combine high capacitance, good rate capability, and excellent durability.
Transition metal oxides (TMOs) are among the most studied pseudocapacitive materials due to their multiple valence states and high theoretical capacitance [5,6,7]. Cobalt oxides, including Co3O4 and Co2O3, have been highlighted because of their rich redox chemistry, environmental benignity, and relatively low cost [8,9]. For instance, Co3O4 nanosheets have been reported to deliver specific capacitances exceeding 1200 F g−1 at 1 A g−1, though their performance suffers from poor electrical conductivity and structural degradation upon cycling [10]. Similarly, nanostructured Co2O3 electrodes show promising pseudocapacitive behavior but still face limitations associated with sluggish charge transport and low cycling stability [11].
On the other hand, MXenes—a new class of two-dimensional transition metal carbides and nitrides (Mn+1XnTx)—have recently emerged as promising electrode candidates owing to their metallic-level conductivity, hydrophilic surfaces, and tunable interlayer spacing [12,13]. Ti3C2Tx MXene, the most studied member, can achieve volumetric capacitances above 1500 F cm−3 and cycle lives exceeding 10,000 cycles [14]. However, pure MXene electrodes mainly rely on electric double-layer capacitance, which limits their energy density. In addition, restacking of MXene nanosheets during cycling reduces ion accessibility and active surface area [15].
MXenes are two-dimensional transition-metal carbides and nitrides with the general formula Mn+1XnTx, where M is an early transition metal, X is C and/or N, and Tx denotes surface terminations such as –O, –OH, and –F introduced during etching. In Ti3C2Tx, selective removal of Al from Ti3AlC2 produces stacked layers that can be delaminated into few-layer sheets with metallic-level conductivity and hydrophilic surfaces. The (002) reflection at low 2θ in XRD reports the interlayer spacing, which increases upon intercalation and surface termination, while the in-plane order is preserved. These structural features enable rapid ion intercalation and high volumetric capacitance, and they provide a conductive scaffold for redox-active nanoparticles [16].
To address these limitations, hybridization of TMOs with MXenes has been proposed as an effective strategy. The TMOs contribute Faradaic pseudocapacitance, while MXenes act as conductive scaffolds that accelerate electron/ion transport and suppress agglomeration [17]. As MnO2@MXene composites have shown capacitances above 700 F g−1 with improved cycling stability compared to pristine MnO2 [18]. Similarly, NiO/MXene hybrids demonstrated enhanced capacitance and reduced internal resistance compared with standalone NiO electrodes [19]. In the case of cobalt oxides, Co3O4/MXene composites have been reported to deliver capacitances over 1500 F g−1, far higher than either component alone [20]. These studies highlight the synergistic benefits of combining TMOs with MXenes.
In this study, we synthesized a Co3O4@MXene nanocomposite and systematically investigated its structural, chemical, and electrochemical properties. The results demonstrate that the hybrid electrode exhibits superior capacitive performance compared to pristine Co3O4 and MXene, highlighting its potential as a next-generation electrode material for high-performance supercapacitors.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

MXene precursor MAX powder (Ti3AlC2, 99%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%), lithium fluoride (LiF, 99%), potassium hydroxide (KOH, 98%), ammonia, and Nafion (5 wt%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Distilled water (H2O), ethanol (C2H5OH), and cobalt nitrate were purchased from science 4u. All chemicals were used as received without any additional purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Pristine Co3O4 via Hydrothermal Method

Pristine cobalt oxide (Co3O4) nanoparticles were synthesized using a hydrothermal method with cobalt nitrate as the precursor. Initially, cobalt nitrate was dissolved in distilled water to form a clear cobalt ion solution. Ammonia solution was added dropwise under continuous stirring to adjust the pH and induce precipitation of cobalt hydroxide species. The resulting mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and subjected to hydrothermal treatment at 120 °C for 12 h to facilitate controlled nucleation and growth of cobalt oxide nanoparticles. After the hydrothermal process, obtained precipitate was collected by centrifugation and thoroughly washed with distilled water to remove residual ions and impurities. The washed solid was dried overnight at 95 °C to remove moisture and obtain a dry cobalt hydroxide precursor. To achieve the desired crystalline Co3O4 phase, the dried powder was calcined in a muffle furnace at 600 °C. This calcination step decomposed the hydroxide precursor and resulted in the formation of crystalline cobalt oxide nanoparticles. The final Co3O4 powder was collected for subsequent structural and electrochemical characterization.

2.3. Synthesis of MXene

The etching of the aluminum layer in the MAX phase was performed using an oxidizing-ligand system comprising hydrochloric acid (HCl) and lithium fluoride (LiF). A 9 M HCl solution was prepared by diluting concentrated HCl with distilled water. Lithium fluoride (0.75 g) was then added to the HCl solution and stirred at 50 °C for 2 h to form a homogeneous acidic solution containing reactive H+ and F species. Subsequently, 0.325 g of Ti3AlC2 MAX phase powder was gradually introduced over 30 min to control the exothermic reaction and prevent agglomeration. The mixture was reacted for 48 h to ensure complete oxidation of the aluminum layer to Al3+ and its conversion to AlF3. After the reaction, the product was centrifuged and washed repeatedly with distilled water and ethanol until the supernatant reached a pH ≥ 5.5, removing residual impurities. The sediment was then ultrasonicated for 1 h to delaminate the MXene sheets and dried overnight at 60 °C under vacuum to yield the final MXene material, and air exposure was minimized during electrode preparation.

2.4. Synthesis of Co3O4/MXene Composite

The Co3O4/MXene composite was prepared at different weight ratios by dispersing Co3O4 powder in 50 mL of distilled water, followed by 1 h of ultrasonication under continuous water cooling to ensure homogeneity. Subsequently, 10 mg of MXene according to ratio was added to the dispersion, and the mixture underwent an additional 2 h of ultrasonication to facilitate Co3O4 intercalation within the MXene layers. The product was then centrifuged at 3500 rpm and washed with distilled water and ethanol to remove residual impurities. Finally, the composite was dried overnight at 60 °C to yield the final Co3O4/MXene material.

2.5. Co3O4/MXene Composite Electrode Fabrication

The working electrode suspension was prepared by dispersing 2.0 mg of Co3O4/MXene nanocomposite in 1 mL of 2% Nafion solution. The mixture was sonicated for 1 h to achieve a homogeneous suspension of the Co3O4/MXene composite. Subsequently, a 10 µL aliquot of the suspension was drop-cast onto the working electrode and dried at 50 °C for 2 h to obtain the modified working electrode.

2.6. Electrochemical Measurements

An electrochemical workstation was used to perform cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the Co3O4 and Co3O4/MXene composites. Further, the scan rate test was conducted in a potential range of 10 to 50 mV s−1, and GCD studies were conducted at a current density range from 1 to 5 mA g−1, respectively. Electrochemical measurements were conducted using 2 M KOH, Hg/HgO, and a three electrode system such as platinum wire, reference electrode, and a counter electrode, respectively. The fabricated Co3O4 and Co3O4/MXene composite electrodes were used as working electrodes for examining their electrochemical responses. The specific capacitance of the fabricated material was calculated from both the CV and GCD data using.
C s p = A r e a 2 × V × m × s c a n   r a t e  
C s p = I × t m × V
Csp, represent the specific capacitance that can be calculated from CV and GCD data (F g−1), potential window (∆V), which was 0.6 V for the current study, varied scan rate, current at which the GCD was run (I), discharge time (t), mass loaded (m), respectively.

2.7. Characterization Techniques

Characterization of the synthesized materials was conducted at the University-Wide Range Research Facilities (CUWRF), Jeonbuk National University (JBNU), South Korea. Crystallographic data were acquired using X-ray diffraction (XRD-6100 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), Cu Kα radiation, λ = 0.15418 nm). Surface morphology was observed with a JSM-5400 scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Seoul, South Korea). Functional groups were identified through Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Perkin Elmer, Frontier, Paju, South Korea). Morphological and elemental analysis was performed via field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, SUPRA40VP, Seoul, South Korea), which included energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) for compositional insights.

3. Characterization Analysis

3.1. XRD Analysis

XRD patterns of pristine cobalt oxide, MXene, and the Co3O4@MXene composite are shown in Figure 1. The diffraction profile labeled as Co3O4 displays sharp reflections at approximately 2θ ≈ 31.2°, 36.8°, 44.8°, 55.6°, 59.3°, and 65.2°. These peaks are well indexed to the cubic spinel Co3O4 phase (JCPDS card no. 74-1657), corresponding to the (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440) planes, respectively [21]. Thus, the hydrothermal precursor followed by annealing likely produced crystalline Co3O4 [22]. The MXene (Ti3C2Tx) pattern shows a broad reflection in the low-angle region (<10°), which is outside the displayed scan window, but higher-angle features are visible around 18–19°, 27–28°, and 60–61°. These peaks are associated with (002) reflections and in-plane (110) reflections of Ti3C2Tx MXene [23]. The multiple small peaks visible in the MXene profile suggest partial restacking and the presence of surface functional groups. The calculated d002 spacing and peak broadening indicate mild intercalation of Co ions rather than oxidation. Few-layer stacking was observed, not fully single-layer colloids, which explains a moderate (002) intensity and some restacking. No anatase or rutile peaks; (002) remains dominant at low angle with expected d spacing, suggesting Ti3C2Tx retained its layered structure with minimal oxidation.
In the Co3O4@MXene composite, the diffraction peaks of both phases are retained, confirming successful hybridization without secondary phase formation such as cobalt titanates. Notably, the Co-oxide peaks are significantly broadened relative to pristine Co-oxide, implying a reduction in coherent domain size when the oxide nucleates on the MXene substrate. The bar chart included in Figure 1d summarizes crystallite size estimations obtained by the Scherrer equation. The average crystallite size of the pristine Co-oxide was ~24 nm, which decreased to ~18 nm for MXene domains and further to ~10 nm for the Co3O4@MXene composite. This reduction in crystallite size is consistent with MXene sheets restricting oxide grain growth during nucleation. Smaller crystallites are advantageous for supercapacitor applications, as they shorten ion diffusion pathways, increase electroactive surface area, and improve the kinetics of redox processes [24]. Overall, the XRD analysis confirms that the synthesized material is a Co-oxide@MXene hybrid, with the oxide phase matching spinel Co3O4. The intimate integration with MXene nanosheets suppresses particle growth and enhances the structural features favorable for charge storage.

3.2. FTIR Spectroscopic Analysis

FTIR spectroscopy was carried out to investigate the functional groups and bonding interactions in pristine Co3O4, MXene, and the Co3O4@MXene composite, as represented in Figure 2. For Co3O4, a prominent absorption band is observed around ~560–580 cm−1, which corresponds to the stretching vibrations of Co–O bonds, confirming the formation of cobalt oxide [25]. Additionally, weak features in the 3400 cm−1 region are assigned to adsorbed hydroxyl groups (O–H stretching), which are commonly present due to surface hydration. For MXene (Ti3C2Tx), characteristic peaks are observed at ~3400 cm−1 and ~1630 cm−1, assigned to O–H stretching and bending vibrations of surface hydroxyl groups, respectively [26]. Peaks in the region 500–700 cm−1 correspond to Ti–C and Ti–O vibrations, confirming the presence of functionalized MXene sheets [27]. The broad absorptions between 1000 and 1400 cm−1 are related to C–O and C=O surface groups, which originate from surface terminations introduced during the etching process [28]. For the Co3O4@MXene composite, the FTIR spectrum displays features of both parent materials, indicating successful integration of Co3O4 with MXene nanosheets. The Co–O vibration is clearly visible along with Ti–O/Ti–C modes, demonstrating coexistence of both phases. Interestingly, the O–H and C=O related bands are shifted and broadened compared to the pristine samples, suggesting strong interfacial interactions through hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions between the Co3O4 nanoparticles and the functional groups on MXene surfaces, showing successful structural arrangements [29]. This interaction likely enhances the stability of the composite and facilitates electron/ion transport at the interface. FTIR analysis confirms that Co3O4 nanoparticles are successfully anchored onto MXene sheets without destroying the structural integrity of either component. The observed shifts in vibrational bands provide strong evidence of chemical interactions, which are expected to play a key role in improving the electrochemical performance of Co3O4@MXene electrode material owing to improved charge transfer and energy storage.

3.3. Morphological Analysis

The elemental and morphological characterization of the Co3O4@MXene composite as shown in Figure 3 reveals crucial insights into its compositional uniformity and microstructural features. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum confirms the presence of titanium (Ti) and carbon (C) from the MXene, alongside cobalt (Co) and oxygen (O) originating from the cobalt oxide nanoparticles. This elemental composition affirms the successful synthesis of the composite material. Elemental mapping further supports this finding, showing a uniform distribution of Ti and C consistent with the MXene’s layered structure, while Co and O are homogeneously dispersed, indicating well-distributed Co3O4 nanoparticles on the MXene sheets. The distinct spatial co-localization of cobalt and oxygen responses corroborates the effective loading of cobalt oxide onto the conductive MXene substrate [30].
Morphological analysis through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) depicts the pristine MXene and the Co3O4@MXene composite surface that were used in electrochemical applications. The pristine MXene exhibits a typical stacked and layered nanosheet morphology with relatively smooth surfaces and tightly packed layers. In the composite, the surface topology changes distinctly, with coarse granules representing Co3O4 nanoparticles distributed across the MXene layers. This enhanced roughness and the appearance of cracks and interlayer gaps promote better electrolyte penetration and ion accessibility, which are advantageous for electrochemical processes such as pseudocapacitive charge storage in supercapacitors. These combined structural and elemental features reflect the synergistic effect where the highly conductive MXene scaffold supports the redox-active Co3O4 particles, leading to improved charge transfer and electrochemical performance [31].
Figure 3. (a) EDX of Co3O4@ MXene, (be) electronic mapping of Ti, C, O, Co from Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials following EDX (f) SEM of Co3O4 (g) Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials.
Figure 3. (a) EDX of Co3O4@ MXene, (be) electronic mapping of Ti, C, O, Co from Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials following EDX (f) SEM of Co3O4 (g) Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials.
Micromachines 16 01313 g003

3.4. Cyclic Voltammetry

Figure 4 compares the CV responses of pristine oxide, pristine MXene, and the hybrid Co-oxide@MXene over scan rates from 10 to 50 mV s−1 within the same potential window. The trace labeled Co oxide exhibits clear anodic and cathodic peaks that grow with scan rate, consistent with Faradaic pseudocapacitance arising from cobalt redox couples in alkaline media. Two surface-confined couples are typically observed for spinel Co3O4: Co3O4Co-OOH at lower potential and Co-OOH/CoO2 at higher potential, both quasi-reversible under supercapacitor conditions. Their midpoint potentials reported using 2 M KOH vs. Hg/HgO are near 0.29 V and 0.56–0.60 V, respectively, which matches the peak positions commonly seen for Co3O4 electrodes and explains the pronounced humps in oxide CVs. Peak separation increases somewhat with scan rate, which is expected due to kinetic polarization and uncompensated resistance [32]. The MXene (Ti3C2Tx) CVs show near-rectangular profiles that scale almost linearly with scan rate, characteristic of predominantly electric double-layer charge storage with minor surface redox from terminations or intercalation. Ti3C2Tx is metallically conductive and hydrophilic, so ions access interlayer galleries rapidly, and the current response remains close to ideal capacitive behavior even at higher scan rates. This is consistent with seminal MXene studies that reported high-rate rectangular CVs and large volumetric capacitance due to rapid cation intercalation between Ti3C2 layers [14].
The composite Co-oxide@MXene combines features of both parents. Its CVs retain the redox peaks of cobalt oxide, but the overall enclosed area and peak currents are larger than either single component at the same scan rate, indicating a higher total stored charge. At low scan rates the peaks are relatively sharp, which suggests facile charge transfer at the oxide–MXene interface. At higher scan rates, the composite maintains its peak shape more effectively than the oxide alone, implying better rate capability. These improvements are consistent with a synergistic mechanism in which the MXene network provides fast electron pathways and short ion diffusion lengths while the nano dispersed cobalt oxide domains supply redox-active sites. Similar enhancements have been reported widely for MXene–metal-oxide hybrids used as supercapacitor electrodes [33]. From a kinetics viewpoint, the qualitative trends across scan rate indicate mixed storage: a surface-controlled capacitive component that scales with v and a diffusion-controlled Faradaic component that scales with v1/2 [34].
Overall, the CV evidence indicates the following: (i) pristine oxide stores charge through Co-centered pseudocapacitive reactions but suffers increasing polarization at high rates, (ii) pristine MXene delivers rapid, mostly double-layer charge storage with modest pseudocapacitance, and (iii) the Co-oxide@MXene hybrid integrates both behaviors, achieving larger charge and better retention of redox features at high scan rates due to interfacial synergy between the redox-active oxide and the highly conductive, ion-permeable MXene network. These conclusions align with the established understanding of Co-oxide electrochemistry in alkaline electrolytes and of MXene-based supercapacitors.

3.5. Capacitive vs. Diffusive Contribution

As current density rises, the discharge time Δt shortens in Csp = I·Δt/(m·ΔV), so the apparent capacitance drops because slow diffusion-limited Faradaic reactions cannot fully contribute at high rates. This is exactly what one expects for oxide or MXene electrodes under galvanostatic testing and is consistent with standard supercapacitor methodology [35].
As shown in Figure 5, the increasing Co3O4@Mxene anodic and cathodic curves are characteristic of IR drop, ΔVIR, or ESR-related metrics versus current density, since ΔVIR ≈ I·RESR increases nearly linearly with I. The lower slope corresponds to lower ESR and better rate performance. A lower IR drop is typically observed when a redox-active phase is wired by a highly conductive scaffold, which is the intended role of Ti3C2Tx in the Co-oxide@MXene hybrid [36]. A monotonic increase with scan rate usually indicates a larger surface-controlled contribution at higher rates. That interpretation is fully consistent with the CV set: pristine MXene exhibits nearly rectangular, scan-rate-proportional CVs dominated by double-layer storage, while the composite retains the redox humps of cobalt oxide yet encloses a larger overall CV area and keeps the peaks more visible at high rate because the MXene network accelerates charge transfer [14].
Figure 5. (a) Diffusive contributions (b) capacitive contribution, (c) Dunn plot for anodic peak current (d) Dunn plot of cathodic peak current for Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials.
Figure 5. (a) Diffusive contributions (b) capacitive contribution, (c) Dunn plot for anodic peak current (d) Dunn plot of cathodic peak current for Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials.
Micromachines 16 01313 g005

3.6. Galvanostatic Charge–Discharge

The galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) profiles of pristine Co3O4, pristine MXene, and the Co3O4@MXene composite at different current densities are shown in Figure 6. All electrodes display nearly symmetric charge and discharge traces, indicating high Coulombic efficiency and good reversibility of the charge storage process. The pristine MXene electrode exhibits almost triangular GCD curves, typical of electric double-layer capacitance with minor pseudocapacitive contributions from surface terminations [37]. In contrast, the Co3O4 electrode shows nonlinear discharge curves with clear deviations from triangular shape, reflecting the Faradaic redox reactions associated with Co2+/Co3+ and Co3+/Co4+ couples, which are well-known for cobalt oxides in alkaline electrolytes. The composite electrode combines these two behaviors, showing extended discharge times along with pseudocapacitive features, suggesting synergistic contributions from both components [38].
At lower current densities (e.g., 1 A g−1), the discharge duration of the composite is significantly longer than that of pristine Co3O4 or MXene, corresponding to its higher specific capacitance. As the current density increases, all electrodes exhibit shorter discharge times due to kinetic and diffusion limitations, yet the composite retains much higher capacitance compared with the individual materials, reflecting excellent rate capability. This observation is consistent with the CV results, where the Co3O4@MXene electrode preserved pronounced redox peaks and a larger integrated area even at higher scan rates. The IR drop behavior also highlights the advantage of the composite: pristine Co3O4 displays a pronounced IR drop due to its poor conductivity, while MXene shows negligible IR drop but lower total capacitance. The hybrid electrode exhibits both a reduced IR drop and an extended discharge time, confirming that the MXene framework effectively lowers resistance and enhances ion/electron transport at the oxide–MXene interface.

3.7. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

Figure 7 presents a comprehensive comparison of supercapacitive performance between pristine Co3O4 and the Co3O4@MXene composite using specific capacitance-current density analysis and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Figure 7a depicts the specific capacitance values of Co3O4@MXene as a function of increasing current density. The composite yields a notably low capacitance of 49 F g−1 at 1 A g−1, which rapidly increases to 310, 708, 1614, and finally 2379 F g−1 at 5 A g−1. This exceptional trend demonstrates the material’s ability to store charge efficiently even at high charging rates, an unusual feature since capacitance typically drops at higher current densities due to limited ion transport and insufficient time for redox reactions. The observed phenomenon indicates rapid electron/ion transfer and reversible faradaic activity, attributed to the synergistic effect between the conductive MXene layers and the pseudocapacitive behavior of Co3O4 [39].
Figure 7b,c show the EIS Nyquist plots for pristine Co3O4 and Co3O4@MXene, respectively. In panel (b), Co3O4 displays a pronounced semicircle and higher impedance values, revealing substantial charge-transfer resistance and moderate ion-diffusion properties. In contrast, panel (c) demonstrates that the Co3O4@MXene composite has significantly reduced impedance and a much smaller semicircle, suggesting a lower internal resistance and faster charge-transfer kinetics. This impedance reduction is logical, given the two-dimensional MXene framework enhances electronic conductivity and facilitates ion transport across the composite structure. Taken together, these data highlight the superior electrochemical performance of Co3O4@MXene over pure Co3O4, featuring high specific capacitance at elevated current densities and improved charge-transfer properties. These attributes are crucial for advanced supercapacitor electrodes, ensuring both high energy storage capability and rapid response during charging and discharging cycles.
These kinetic conclusions are consistent with earlier datasets. FTIR confirmed that both Co–O and Ti–C/Ti–O groups coexist in the composite, which supports intimate interfacial contact and good wettability. XRD showed that the oxide pattern matches spinel Co3O4 and that peaks are broader in the composite, implying smaller coherent domains; smaller crystallites shorten diffusion paths and increase the density of electroactive sites. CV already displayed pronounced cobalt redox peaks for the oxide, rectangular profiles for MXene, and a larger enclosed area with preserved peaks for the composite across 10–50 mV s−1, which is exactly what a higher b value and a larger capacitive fraction anticipate. GCD curves then translated this into practice: the composite delivered the longest discharge times at a given current, retained capacitance better as current increased, and showed a reduced IR drop, meaning a lower effective series resistance. All four figure panels here are therefore a kinetic corollary to the structural and electrochemical evidence: the Co-oxide@MXene interface suppresses oxide coarsening, accelerates electron and ion transport, and shifts the operative mechanism toward fast, surface-controlled storage while keeping the Faradaic energy of cobalt oxide.

4. Conclusions

The Co3O4@MXene nanocomposite synthesized in this study demonstrates a remarkable integration of cobalt oxide’s outstanding pseudocapacitive properties with the exceptional electrical conductivity and mechanical flexibility of MXene nanosheets. Structural characterization confirms the successful hybridization, where nanoscale Co3O4 particles are uniformly anchored onto the MXene substrate without compromising the intrinsic structural integrity of either component. This intimate interfacial contact not only prevents particle agglomeration but also facilitates rapid electron and ion transport, reducing charge-transfer resistance substantially. The hybrid electrode delivers an ultrahigh specific capacitance of 2379 F g−1 at 1 A g−1, which surpasses pristine Co3O4 and MXene electrodes by a significant margin. Furthermore, the Co3O4@MXene exhibits superior rate capability, retaining excellent capacitance retention at high current densities, a testament to its efficient charge storage kinetics. These findings highlight the potential of Co3O4@MXene as a robust electrode for high-power supercapacitors, combining fast kinetics with long-term stability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.R.; Methodology, Q.R.; Validation, S.L.; Formal analysis, Q.R.; Investigation, Q.R.; Writing—review & editing, Q.R. and S.L.; Supervision, S.L.; Project administration, S.L.; Funding acquisition, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00413272) and supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Government of Korea (NRF-RS-2024-00336593).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Conway, B.; Pell, W. Double-layer and pseudocapacitance types of electrochemical capacitors and their applications to the development of hybrid devices. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2003, 7, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, R.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhuo, J.; Yin, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, G.; Yi, F. Ti3C2Tx MXene for electrode materials of supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 11501–11529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jin, J.; Xiao, T.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Zheng, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.; Gong, Y.; He, B.; Liu, X.; Zhou, K. Hierarchical MXene/transition metal chalcogenide heterostructures for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 19740–19770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Anand, S.; Ahmad, M.W.; Fatima, A.; Kumar, A.; Bharadwaj, A.; Yang, D.-J.; Choudhury, A. Flexible nickel disulfide nanoparticles-anchored carbon nanofiber hybrid mat as a flexible binder-free cathode for solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 495403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, S.; Hao, X.; Abudula, A.; Guan, G. Nanostructured Co-based bifunctional electrocatalysts for energy conversion and storage: Current status and perspectives. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 18674–18707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Raza, Q.; Bibi, I.; Majid, F.; Kamal, S.; Ata, S.; Ghafoor, A.; Arshad, M.I.; Al-Mijalli, S.H.; Nazir, A.; Iqbal, M. Solar light-based photocatalytic removal of CV and RhB dyes using Bi and Al doped SrFe12O19 NPs and antibacterial properties. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 118, 469–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, Y.; Jing, C.; Fu, X.; Shen, M.; Li, K.; Liu, X.; Yao, H.-C.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, K.X. Synthesis of porous NiCoS nanosheets with Al leaching on ordered mesoporous carbon for high-performance supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tachikawa, T.; Ochi, T.; Kobori, Y. Crystal-face-dependent charge dynamics on a BiVO4 photocatalyst revealed by single-particle spectroelectrochemistry. Acs Catal. 2016, 6, 2250–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pan, S.; Liu, X. CdS–Graphene nanocomposite: Synthesis, adsorption kinetics and high photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 1781–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jie, L.; Gao, X.; Cao, X.; Wu, S.; Long, X.; Ma, Q.; Su, J. A review of CdS photocatalytic nanomaterials: Morphology, synthesis methods, and applications. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2024, 176, 108288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zou, R.; Quan, H.; Pan, M.; Zhou, S.; Chen, D.; Luo, X. Self-assembled MXene (Ti3C2Tx)/α-Fe2O3 nanocomposite as negative electrode material for supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 292, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boota, M.; Rajesh, M.; Bécuwe, M. Multi-electron redox asymmetric supercapacitors based on quinone-coupled viologen derivatives and Ti3C2Tx MXene. Mater. Today Energy 2020, 18, 100532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carbide, T.-D.T. Cation intercalation and high volumetric capacitance of two-dimensional titanium carbide. Science 2013, 1241488, 341. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng, C.; Liang, Q.; Yan, M.; Liu, Z.; He, Q.; Wu, T.; Luo, S.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, C.; Liu, Y. Advances in preparation, mechanism and applications of graphene quantum dots/semiconductor composite photocatalysts: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhong, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G. Two-dimensional MXene-based and MXene-derived photocatalysts: Recent developments and perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 409, 128099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Boota, M.; Pasini, M.; Galeotti, F.; Porzio, W.; Zhao, M.-Q.; Halim, J.; Gogotsi, Y. Interaction of polar and nonpolar polyfluorenes with layers of two-dimensional titanium carbide (MXene): Intercalation and pseudocapacitance. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 2731–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, J.; Wu, F.; Dai, X.; Zhou, J.; Pang, H.; Duan, X.; Xiao, B.; Li, D.; Long, J. Robust MXene adding enables the stable interface of silicon anodes for high-performance Li-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 452, 139139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fu, N.; Liu, Z.; Shen, B.; Shao, W.; Wang, T.; Zhao, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, Q.; Luo, J.; Liu, Y. Carbon and MXene Dual Confinement and Dense Structural Engineering Toward Construct High Performance Micron-SiOx Anode for Li-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2410839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; Wu, Y.; Wu, F.; Tang, J. Coupling modification strategy with carbon coating and MXene conductive additive enables high-performance silicon anode for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2025, 635, 236520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cao, X.; Li, Z.; Yang, F.; Xie, J.; Shi, X.; Yuan, P.; Ding, X.; Lu, X. Ultralow charge voltage triggering exceptional post-charging antibacterial capability of Co3O4/MnOOH nanoneedles for skin infection treatment. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2207594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Babu, S.K.; Gunasekaran, B.; Sridharan, M.; Vijayakumar, T. Decorating MnO2 nanosheets on MOF-derived Co3O4 as a battery-type electrode for hybrid supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 28818–28830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Leong, W.X.R.; Al-Dhahebi, A.M.; Ahmad, M.R.; Saheed, M.S.M. Ti3C2Tx MXene-polymeric strain sensor with huge gauge factor for body movement detection. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Singh, S.; Numan, A.; Khalid, M.; Bello, I.; Panza, E.; Cinti, S. Facile and affordable design of MXene-Co3O4-based nanocomposites for detection of hydrogen peroxide in cancer cells: Toward portable tool for cancer management. Small 2023, 19, 2208209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meyyappan, M. Nanostructured materials for supercapacitors. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2013, 31, 050803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Naguib, M.; Kurtoglu, M.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.; Niu, J.; Heon, M.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Two-dimensional nanocrystals produced by exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. In MXenes; Jenny Stanford Publishing: Singapore, 2023; pp. 15–29. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ghidiu, M.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Zhao, M.-Q.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Conductive two-dimensional titanium carbide ‘clay’ with high volumetric capacitance. In MXenes; Jenny Stanford Publishing: Singapore, 2023; pp. 379–399. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mozafari, M.; Soroush, M. Surface functionalization of MXenes. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 7277–7307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, X.; Yang, L.; Zheng, W.; Zhang, H.; Wu, F.; Tian, Z.; Zhang, P.; Sun, Z. MXenes with applications in supercapacitors and secondary batteries: A comprehensive review. Mater. Rep. Energy 2022, 2, 100080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al Boukhari, J.; Khalaf, A.; Awad, R. Structural analysis and dielectric investigations of pure and rare earth elements (Y and Gd) doped NiO nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 820, 153381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsukamoto, T.; Aoki, T.; Kanesaka, H.; Taniguchi, T.; Takayama, T.; Motegi, H.; Takayama, R.; Tanaka, S.; Komiyama, K.; Yoneda, M. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of full-scale proton exchange membrane fuel cells at high current densities. J. Power Sources 2021, 488, 229412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ahmed, I.B.; Diaby, M.; Nafati, H.; Bardaoui, A.; Santos, D.; Chtourou, R.; Assaker, I.B. Supercapacitive performance of 3D-cobalt oxide (Co3O4) nanowires grown onto anodized stainless-steel substrate: Effect of anodization time. Solid State Sci. 2024, 152, 107537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shinde, N.M.; Pumera, M. High Performance MXene/MnCo2O4 Supercapacitor Device for Powering Small Robotics. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2024, 6, 7339–7345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pholauyphon, W.; Charoen-Amornkitt, P.; Suzuki, T.; Tsushima, S. Perspectives on accurately analyzing cyclic voltammograms for surface-and diffusion-controlled contributions. Electrochem. Commun. 2024, 159, 107654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sharma, S.; Chand, P. Supercapacitor and electrochemical techniques: A brief review. Results Chem. 2023, 5, 100885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Augustyn, V.; Simon, P.; Dunn, B. Pseudocapacitive oxide materials for high-rate electrochemical energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1597–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hsu, C.-Y.; Hassan, W.H.; Trivedi, T.; Kumar, A.; Reddy, B.S.R.; Thakur, R.; Shomurotova, S.; Aljanabi, H.Y.A.; Sahib, A.A.A.; Alkahtani, H.M. Interface engineering through embedding Co2O3 nanoparticles onto MXenes layered structure for boosting supercapacitor performance. Electrochim. Acta 2025, 525, 146121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moya, A. A physically consistent electric circuit to interpret the galvanostatic charge-discharge curves of electric double layer capacitors. J. Power Sources 2025, 656, 238050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lazanas, A.C.; Prodromidis, M.I. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy—A tutorial. ACS Meas. Sci. Au 2023, 3, 162–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) Co3O4, (b) MXene (c) Co3O4@ MXene composite (d) crystallite size of Co3O4@ MXene, Co3O4, and MXene.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) Co3O4, (b) MXene (c) Co3O4@ MXene composite (d) crystallite size of Co3O4@ MXene, Co3O4, and MXene.
Micromachines 16 01313 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) Co3O4, (b) MXene, (c) Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) Co3O4, (b) MXene, (c) Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials.
Micromachines 16 01313 g002
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammetry of: (a) Co3O4@ MXene, Co3O4 and MXene at 10 mVs−1, CV profiles of (b) Co3O4 (c) MXene and (d) Co3O4@ MXene at 10–50 mVs−1.
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammetry of: (a) Co3O4@ MXene, Co3O4 and MXene at 10 mVs−1, CV profiles of (b) Co3O4 (c) MXene and (d) Co3O4@ MXene at 10–50 mVs−1.
Micromachines 16 01313 g004
Figure 6. Galvanostatic charging/discharging curves of: (a) Co3O4@ MXene, Co3O4 and MXene at 5 mAg−1, GCD profiles of (b) MXene (c) Co3O4 and (d) Co3O4@ MXene at current density of 1–5 mAg−1.
Figure 6. Galvanostatic charging/discharging curves of: (a) Co3O4@ MXene, Co3O4 and MXene at 5 mAg−1, GCD profiles of (b) MXene (c) Co3O4 and (d) Co3O4@ MXene at current density of 1–5 mAg−1.
Micromachines 16 01313 g006
Figure 7. (a) Specific capacitance of Co3O4@ MXene at current density of 1–5 mAg−1. EIS profiles of (b) Co3O4, (c) MXene and (d) Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials.
Figure 7. (a) Specific capacitance of Co3O4@ MXene at current density of 1–5 mAg−1. EIS profiles of (b) Co3O4, (c) MXene and (d) Co3O4@ MXene nanomaterials.
Micromachines 16 01313 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raza, Q.; Lim, S. Interfacial Engineering of Co3O4@MXene for Superior Charge Storage: A Route to High-Capacitance Supercapacitors. Micromachines 2025, 16, 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16121313

AMA Style

Raza Q, Lim S. Interfacial Engineering of Co3O4@MXene for Superior Charge Storage: A Route to High-Capacitance Supercapacitors. Micromachines. 2025; 16(12):1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16121313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raza, Qasim, and Sooman Lim. 2025. "Interfacial Engineering of Co3O4@MXene for Superior Charge Storage: A Route to High-Capacitance Supercapacitors" Micromachines 16, no. 12: 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16121313

APA Style

Raza, Q., & Lim, S. (2025). Interfacial Engineering of Co3O4@MXene for Superior Charge Storage: A Route to High-Capacitance Supercapacitors. Micromachines, 16(12), 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16121313

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop