Next Article in Journal
Seamless Micro-Electro-Mechanical System-Inertial Navigation System/Polarization Compass Navigation Method with Data and Model Dual-Driven Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Additives on Tribological Performance of Magnetorheological Fluids
Previous Article in Journal
Water-Immersible MEMS Mirror with a Large Optical Aperture
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Experimental Study on the Skyhook Control of a Magnetorheological Torsional Vibration Damper

Micromachines 2024, 15(2), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15020236
by Zhicheng Wang 1,2, Hongsheng Hu 2,*, Jiabin Yang 2, Jiajia Zheng 3, Wei Zhao 2 and Qing Ouyang 2,4,5,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Micromachines 2024, 15(2), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15020236
Submission received: 10 January 2024 / Revised: 29 January 2024 / Accepted: 30 January 2024 / Published: 2 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Magnetorheological Materials and Application Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors reported MRTVD construction, theoretical model and experimental results for it. The work is well written and organized. Publication could be considered if the authors carefully address the following comments:

1.     Page 2, line 59. It is written that “Numerous scholars have conducted relevant research and exploration on magnetorheological torsional vibration dampers”. Nevertheless, authors give just 4 references. It would be great if the authors added examples of other magnetorheological torsional vibration dampers.

2.     It is necessary to indicate the materials from which the damper elements are made.

3.     In my opinion Figure 2 should be divided into 2. It is also necessary to indicate how the given curves were measured.

4.     Page 9, line 281. It is written that “the excitation frequency was incrementally and uniformly raised, commencing from 0 Hz”. It is not clear, what is frequency 0 Hz?

5.     It is not clear, how results shown in Figure 10 were obtained.

6.     Why is the second mode of oscillation at a frequency of 50.9 Hz more pronounced than the first at a frequency of 11.8 Hz?

7.     Figure 12 shows the existence of some optimal current. It is advisable to give reasons in the text why a certain meaning exists.

8.     It is advisable to provide the errors in the results obtained.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop