Next Article in Journal
Heat Transfer Performance of Gel Foam Layer with Nanoparticles Doping under a Radiative Heat Flux
Next Article in Special Issue
A 7.5-mV Input and 88%-Efficiency Single-Inductor Boost Converter with Self-Startup and MPPT for Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting
Previous Article in Journal
A High-Sensitivity Bowel Sound Electronic Monitor Based on Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cluster-ID-Based Throughput Improvement in Cognitive Radio Networks for 5G and Beyond-5G IoT Applications
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

A Review of Converter Circuits for Ambient Micro Energy Harvesting

Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2222; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122222
by Qian Lian 1,2, Peiqing Han 3 and Niansong Mei 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2222; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122222
Submission received: 5 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 14 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors have presented a review of converter circuits for ambient micro-energy harvesting. The work is useful. Following comments will be helpful to further improve the manuscript.

Figures are smaller in size. The size should be increased for better visibility to an adequate size.

It would be great to add more details/comments on potential applications to section 7 “Future Directions and Recommendations”

Check the manuscript carefully for grammatical errors and/or typos.

Overall, the work is useful and is well presented.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

The review provided in this paper is interesting and actual. However, please notice comments given below in order to upgrade your paper.

·         The converter losses mentioned in line 107 are semiconductor losses because the converter losses also comprise the losses of the passive components such as the inductor losses.

 

·         The sentence in line 116 is not clear, it shouldn’t start with [8]. Please correct and check entire text.

 

·         Symbols should be written in italic in Figs and text. For example, VTH in line 180. Please correct entire text.

 

·         P&O should be described in the first occurrence in the text.

 

·         Some sort of comparison of the considered methods based on simulations (e.g. Matlab Simulink) or in better case experiments should be shown.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

See attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I think the paper is now ready for the publication.

Reviewer 3 Report

accept

Back to TopTop