Next Article in Journal
A New Data-Driven Control System for MEMSs Gyroscopes: Dynamics Estimation by Type-3 Fuzzy Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Erratum: Zhu, Y.; Pal, J. Low-Voltage and High-Reliability RF MEMS Switch with Combined Electrothermal and Electrostatic Actuation. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1237
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measurement of the Thermal Effect of Standing Surface Acoustic Waves in Microchannel by Fluoresence Intensity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acoustic Bessel Vortex Beam by Quasi-Three-Dimensional Reflected Metasurfaces

1
Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, School of Computer Science and Communication Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics, Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Acoustics, Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Micromachines 2021, 12(11), 1388; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111388
Submission received: 23 October 2021 / Revised: 9 November 2021 / Accepted: 9 November 2021 / Published: 12 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Acoustic Microfluidics)

Abstract

:
Vortex beams have a typical characteristic of orbital angular momentum, which provides a new degree of freedom for information processing in remote communication and a form of non-contact manipulation for trapping particles. In acoustics, vortex beams are generally observed on the surface of a metamaterial structure or in a waveguide with a hard boundary owing to the characteristic of easy diffusion in free space. The realization of an acoustic vortex beam with a long-distance propagation in free space still remains a challenge. To overcome this, we report a type of acoustic Bessel vortex (ABV) beam created by a quasi-three-dimensional reflected metasurface in free space based on phase modulation. By using the Bessel and vortex phase profiles, we can realize an ABV beam with the high performances of both Bessel and vortex beams, and its effective propagation distance is larger than 9.2λ in free space. Beyond that, we discuss the bandwidth and topological charge of the ABV beam in detail, and the fractional bandwidth can reach about 0.28. The proposed ABV beam has the advantages of a high-performance vortex, long-distance propagation, and broad bandwidth, which provide a new pathway for designing multifunctional vortex devices with promising applications.

1. Introduction

Recent years have witnessed the great development of acoustic vortex beams owing to their extensive applications in a wide range of fields, such as sound communication [1,2] and particle trapping [3,4,5]. The acoustic vortex beam can transfer different-order vortex wavefronts with orbital angular momentum, opening up a new degree of freedom for sound modulations [6,7,8,9,10]. Traditionally, by designing active sound arrays composed of phased sources [2,11,12,13], researchers have experimentally realized acoustic vortex beams to manipulate micro-particles underwater. However, the high cost and complex circuits of the active systems create some difficulties for their further applications.
To overcome these restrictions, the emergence of acoustic metamaterials [14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and metasurfaces [21,22,23,24,25,26,27] have provided alternative design schemes for passive acoustic lenses of vortex beams. As examples, by designing thickness-gradient structures [28,29] or an acoustic plate with a spiral shaped structure [30,31,32], the acoustic vortex beam can be observed around structure surfaces. However, their structures must satisfy the geometric characteristics of spiral distribution. On the other hand, by tailoring phase profiles of acoustic metasurfaces, sound energy can also be formed as an acoustic vortex beam based on phase modulation [33,34,35,36,37]. For instance, by designing phase profiles of Helmholtz resonators in a circular waveguide, acoustic vortex beams are also observed, and the sound energy of vortex beams can propagate in the waveguide with a hard boundary [34,37]. Furthermore, multifunctional vortex beams of sound can also be obtained by changing phase profiles, such as focusing vortices [38,39] and vortex beams with asymmetric propagation [40], which have potential special applications. Additionally, the finite element method based on the COMSOL Multiphysics software has been introduced to numerically design and optimize different types of acoustic vortex devices, such as unidirectional vortex beams through acoustic Weyl crystal with a topological lattice defect, and a vortex converter composed of an acoustic metagrating in a waveguide [10,37,40], and the corresponding simulated results agree well with the measured ones. However, these aforementioned vortex beams are generally observed on structure surfaces or in waveguides with a hard boundary owing to the characteristic of easy diffusion in free space. The realization of an acoustic vortex beam with long-distance propagation in free space still poses a great challenge.
In our work, we propose a type of quasi-three-dimensional (quasi-3D) reflected metasurface to realize an acoustic Bessel vortex (ABV) beam by phase modulation. Based on the Bessel and vortex phase profiles, we can realize an ABV beam with the advantages of both a high-performance vortex and long-distance propagation in free space, which overcomes the limitations of easy diffusion in free space. Moreover, we discuss the working bandwidth of the ABV beam in detail, and its fractional bandwidth can reach about 0.28, showing the characteristic of broad bandwidth. Finally, we design and realize ABV beams with different topological charges. The designed ABV beams with a high-performance vortex and long-distance propagation may lead to important advances in diverse applications.

2. Design and Methods

As schematically shown in Figure 1a, we propose a type of quasi-3D reflected unit composed of a cuboid solid with a groove on the upper side. The cross sections x-z and y-z of the unit are the same, and the structure parameters are selected as w = 1.0 cm, h = 2.5 cm, and d = 0.1 cm. The groove depth h0 is tunable to modulate reflected phase delays of sound. The incident wavelength λ of sound is selected as 3.8 cm (viz., frequency f0 = 9.0 kHz in air). Throughout this work, the characteristics of sound reflections are numerically simulated by the COMSOL Multiphysics software. Here, the pressure field is calculated in the acoustic–solid interaction module, and the solid structure is made of epoxy resin to satisfy the acoustic-structure boundary conditions. The material parameters are adopted as follows: the density ρ = 1180 kg/m3, the longitudinal wave velocity cl = 2720 m/s, and the transversal wave velocity ct = 1460 m/s for epoxy resin; ρ = 1.21 kg/m3 and the sound velocity c = 343 m/s for air.
Figure 1b shows the reflected phase delays of sound created by the quasi-3D units with different values of h0. We can see that, in the range 0.1 < h0 < 2.4 cm, the theoretical reflected phase delay (blue solid line) can cover the whole 2π range. Here, we select 16 discrete values of h0 (red open circles) to realize an equally spaced phase delay from 0 to 2π with a step of π/8.
Based on the selected 16 reflected phased units, we can design a type of planar quasi-3D reflected metasurface of the ABV beam by phase modulation. Figure 2a shows the normal incidence of an acoustic wave on the quasi-3D reflected metasurface, and the sound reflections are formed as an ABV beam. To design it, we introduce the phase profile of a vortex beam in free space, which is expressed as
φ s ( θ ) = n θ ,
where n is the topological charge of the vortex beam [31], and θ is the azimuth angle which is in the range from 0 to 2π in the x-y plane. To realize a vortex beam with long-distance propagation in free space, we here introduce a non-diffracting Bessel phase profile. Based on the 3D generalized Snell’s law [41] and Equation (1), the final phase profile of the designed quasi-3D reflected metasurface in the x-y plane is given as
φ = k sin α x 2 + y 2 + n θ ,
where k = 2πf/c is the wave number in air, and c and f are the sound velocity and the frequency, respectively. α is the base angle of the Bessel beam, and the parameter θ satisfies tan θ = x/y. Here, the parameters α and n are selected as 15° and 1, respectively, and the size of the quasi-3D metasurface in the x-y plane is 40 cm × 40 cm. Figure 2b,c show the theoretical continuous and discrete phase delays of the quasi-3D reflected metasurface in the x-y plane, respectively. It is worth noting that the phase distribution shows characteristics typical of a vortex beam, and both types of phase profiles agree well with each other.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Performance of ABV Beam

Based on the two types of phase profiles, we realized an ABV beam by designing a quasi-3D reflected metasurface. Figure 3a shows the simulated 3D reflected intensity distribution created by the designed quasi-3D metasurface composed of 16 types of phased units at 9.0 kHz. We observed that the sound reflections were concentrated into a long-distance hollow cylinder along the z direction, which can cover a range from 28 to 72 cm (|p|2 > 5.0 Pa2). On the other hand, the energy of the sound beam in the central region was almost zero, showing typical features of both Bessel and vortex beams. To further show the characteristics of the ABV beam, we also displayed the reflected acoustic intensity and phase distributions of the ABV beam at 5 selected cross sections (z = 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 cm), which are shown in Figure 3b,c, respectively. It is obvious that, with the increase of z, there existed a concentric ring-shaped region at the center of each cross section (Figure 3b), which was the same as that in Figure 3a. Beyond that, the sound energy in the ring-shaped region (|p|2 > 6.0 Pa2) was much larger than the central energy of sound (|p|2 ≈ 0) at the 5 cross sections owing to the existence of a phase singularity at the center (Figure 3c). The phase distributions in Figure 3c show the typical characteristics of the vortex beam with n = 1, further verifying that the ABV beam had both advantages of long-distance propagation and a high-performance vortex in free space. In addition to the aforementioned results, we simulated the acoustic intensity and phase distributions created by the theoretical continuous phase profile for comparison, which are shown in Figure 3d–f. We can see that the characteristics of the observed ABV beam matched well with those in Figure 3a–c, which further demonstrates the performance of the reflected ABV beam by the quasi-3D metasurface.
To quantify the performances of the ABV beam, we also display the simulated longitudinal and transverse intensity distributions of the ABV beam (the lines I–III in Figure 3a), which are shown in Figure 4. We observe that two acoustic energy peaks (|p|2 ≈ 12.0 Pa2) existed on both sides of x = 0, while the sound intensity at x = 0 was close to zero (Figure 4a). In addition, as shown in Figure 4b, the sound intensities along line II were much larger than those along line III (|p|2 ≈ 0), which arose from the existence of the phase singularity along line III. Moreover, the total width at half maximum of the sound intensity along line II reached about 35 cm (9.2λ), showing that the energy of the ABV beam can propagate a long distance in free space. Therefore, we further verified the high performances of both Bessel and vortex beams for the ABV beam created by the quasi-3D reflected metasurface.

3.2. Bandwidth of ABV Beam

Next, we discuss the bandwidth of the quasi-3D reflected metasurface of the ABV beam. Figure 5 shows the intensity and phase distributions created by the quasi-3D reflected metasurface at different frequencies, in which the other parameters remain unchanged. It is noted that, with the increase of frequency, the center position of the ABV beam moved along the +z direction gradually. However, the characteristics of the ABV beam stayed the same as those in Figure 3d–f. Moreover, we also simulated the intensity and phase distributions of the ABV beam at both edge frequencies (8.0 and 11.0 kHz), which are shown in Section Note 1 of the Supplementary Materials. Therefore, the working bandwidth of the designed ABV beam can exceed 2.5 kHz, and its fractional bandwidth is larger than 0.28, showing a broadband characteristic.

3.3. Design of ABV Beam with Different Values of n

Based on Equation (2), we designed the quasi-3D reflected metasurfaces of the ABV beam with different values of n, and their theoretical continuous and discrete phase delays in the x-y plane are shown in Section Note 2 of the Supplementary Materials. Here, we selected n = 2 as an example, and the simulated intensity and phase distributions created by the quasi-3D reflected metasurface at 9.0 kHz, which are shown in Figure 6a,b, respectively. We observe that the sound reflections were concentrated into a hollow cylinder region with a height of 9λ, and the characteristics of the ABS beam were similar to those in Figure 3d (n = 1). However, for the phase distribution in Figure 6b, we observe that the phase delay shifted from 0 to 2π twice around in a circle at 3 cross sections z = 20, 40 and 60 cm, which was different from that in Figure 3f (n = 1). Such a phenomenon is also obviously displayed in Figure 6c. Beyond that, we also designed a fractional ABV beam with values of n = 1.25, 1.5, and 1.75, which is shown in Section Note 3 of the Supplementary Materials. Therefore, by combining both phase profiles of Bessel and vertex beams, we realized an ABV beam with different topological charges.

3.4. Design of Underwater ABV Beam

Finally, we designed a type of planar quasi-3D reflected metasurface of an underwater ABV beam, and simulated the intensity distribution of the underwater ABV beam at 30 kHz, which is shown in Section Note 4 of the Supplementary Materials. The results show that the simulated underwater ABV beam also exhibited characteristics typical of a vortex beam, which can cover a range from 30 to 120 cm (|p|2 > 2.5 Pa2) along the z direction. The propagation distance of the underwater ABV beam (about 22λ) was larger than that (about 10λ) of the holographic algorithm [42]. The designed underwater ABV beam with long-distance propagation will be important for realizing advanced in vivo acoustic tweezers, as it can penetrate deeper into a lesion location, which can be potentially applied to removing broken bones, thrombus ablation, and nerve stimulation.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a quasi-3D reflected metasurface of an ABV beam. The results show that, by using the Bessel and vortex phase profiles, we realized an ABV beam with a high-performance vortex, and its effective propagation distance can exceed 9.2λ in free space, which overcomes the restriction of easy diffusion of vortex beams propagating in free space. Additionally, the designed ABV beam had the characteristic of broad bandwidth, and its fractional bandwidth reached about 0.28. Finally, by modulating the phase profile of the quasi-3D reflected metasurface, we observed ABV beams with different topological charges, where n = 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2. In contrast to the characteristics of acoustic vortex beams [31,34], the proposed ABV beam with the features of long-distance propagation, a high-performance vortex and broad bandwidth provides a novel methodology for sound manipulations and a fertile ground for designing multifunctional vortex devices, which also play an important role in the field of underwater structure measurement.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/mi12111388/s1, Note 1: Intensity and phase distributions of ABV beam at both edge frequencies. Note 2: Theoretical continuous and discrete phase delays of the quasi-3D reflected metasurface with different values of n. Note 3: Intensity and phase distributions of fractional reflected ABV beam. Note 4: Design of underwater ABV Beam

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W. and J.-P.X.; methodology, Y.W. and J.Q.; validation, Y.G.; formal analysis, H.-X.S. and Y.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, H.-X.S.; supervision, H.-X.S., S.-Q.Y. and X.-J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11774137, 11834008, 12174159, and 51779107), the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. KYCX20_3072), and the Undergraduate Practice Innovation Program of Industrial Center in Jiangsu University (Grant No. ZXJG2019105).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brunet, T.; Thomas, J.L.; Marchiano, R. Transverse shift of helical beams and subdiffraction imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 034301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Shi, C.; Dubois, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X. High-speed acoustic communication by multiplexing orbital angular momentum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 7250–7253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Baresch, D.; Thomas, J.L.; Marchiano, R. Observation of a single-beam gradient force acoustical trap for elastic particles: Acoustical tweezers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 024301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Marzo, A.; Ghobrial, A.; Cox, L.; Caleap, M.; Croxford, A.; Drinkwater, B.W. Realization of compact tractor beams using acoustic delay-lines. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 014102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ren, X.; Zhou, Q.; Xu, Z.; Liu, X. Particle trapping in arbitrary trajectories using first-order bessel-Like acoustic beams. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2021, 15, 054041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Strahan, S.E.; Oman, L.D.; Douglass, A.R.; Coy, L. Modulation of antarctic vortex composition by the quasi-biennial oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015, 42, 4216–4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gong, Z.; Baudoin, M. Particle assembly with synchronized acoustic tweezers. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 12, 024045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Guo, J.; Yang, H.; Han, L.; Yao, Y.; Wu, F. Tailoring of diversified sound vortices using curved impedance-matched acoustic metasurfaces. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 34, 2050121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, H.; Zhang, W.; Liao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, J.; Hu, G.; Zhang, X. Creation of acoustic vortex knots. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Q.; Ge, Y.; Sun, H.X.; Xue, H.R.; Jia, D.; Guan, Y.J.; Yuan, S.Q.; Zhang, B.L.; Chong, Y.D. Vortex states in an acoustic Weyl crystal with a topological lattice defect. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marchiano, R.; Thomas, J.-L. Synthesis and analysis of linear and nonlinear acoustical vortices. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 71, 066616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. DeMore, C.E.M.; Yang, Z.; Volovick, A.; Cochran, S.; MacDonald, M.; Spalding, G. Mechanical evidence of the orbital angular momentum to energy ratio of vortex beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 194301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Riaud, A.; Thomas, J.L.; Charron, E.; Bussonnière, A.; Matar, O.B.; Baudoin, M. Anisotropic swirling surface acoustic waves from inverse filtering for on-chip generation of acoustic vortices. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2015, 4, 034004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Liang, Z.; Li, J. Extreme acoustic metamaterial by coiling up space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 114301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cummer, S.A.; Christensen, J.; Alù, A. Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wu, Y.; Yang, M.; Sheng, P. Perspective: Acoustic metamaterials in transition. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 123, 090901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fan, X.D.; Zou, Z.; Zhang, L. Acoustic vortices in inhomogeneous media. Phys. Rev. Res. 2019, 1, 032014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Li, J.; Díaz-Rubio, A.; Shen, C.; Jia, Z.; Tretyakov, S.; Cummer, S. Highly efficient generation of angular momentum with cylindrical bianisotropic metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 024016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Cheng, Y.Z.; Li, W.Y.; Mao, X.S. Triple-band polarization angle independent 90° polarization rotator based on fermat’s spiral structure planar chiral metamaterial. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2019, 165, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ma, F.; Chen, J.; Wu, J.H. Experimental study on performance of time reversal focusing. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2019, 53, 055302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Liang, B.; Gu, Z.M.; Zou, X.Y.; Cheng, J.C. Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, srep02546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Mei, J.; Wu, Y. Controllable transmission and total reflection through an impedance-matched acoustic metasurface. New J. Phys. 2014, 16, 123007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xia, J.P.; Zhang, X.T.; Sun, H.X.; Yuan, S.Q.; Qian, J.; Ge, Y. Broadband tunable acoustic asymmetric focusing lens from dual-layer metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2018, 10, 014016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, N.; Lu, K. An underwater metamaterial for broadband acoustic absorption at low frequency. Appl. Acoust. 2020, 169, 107500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, H.T.; Fan, S.W.; Li, X.S.; Fu, W.X.; Wang, Y.F.; Wang, Y.S. Tunable arc-shaped acoustic metasurface carpet cloak. Smart Mater. Struct. 2020, 29, 065016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Allen, K.W.; Dykes, D.J.P.; Reid, D.R.; Lee, R.T. Multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization of frequency selective metasurfaces to engineer Ku-passband filter responses. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2020, 167, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiménez, N.; Groby, J.P.; Romero-García, V. Spiral sound-diffusing metasurfaces based on holographic vortices. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wunenburger, R.; Lozano, J.I.V.; Brasselet, E. Acoustic orbital angular momentum transfer to matter by chiral scattering. New J. Phys. 2015, 17, 103022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, X.; Shi, C.; Wang, Y.; Smalley, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, X. Nonresonant metasurface for fast decoding in acoustic communications. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020, 13, 014014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, T.; Ke, M.; Li, W.; Yang, Q.; Qiu, C.; Liu, Z. Particle manipulation with acoustic vortex beam induced by a brass plate with spiral shape structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 123506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jia, Y.R.; Wei, Q.; Wu, D.J.; Xu, Z.; Liu, X.J. Generation of fractional acoustic vortex with a discrete archimedean spiral structure plate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 173501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiménez, N.; Romero-García, V.; García-Raffi, L.M.; Camarena, F.; Staliunas, K. Sharp acoustic vortex focusing by Fresnel-spiral zone plates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 204101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ye, L.; Qiu, C.; Lu, J.; Tang, K.; Jia, H.; Ke, M.; Peng, S.; Liu, Z. Making sound vortices by metasurfaces. AIP Adv. 2016, 6, 085007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Jiang, X.; Li, Y.; Liang, B.; Cheng, J.C.; Zhang, L. Convert acoustic resonances to orbital angular momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 034301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Xie, B.; Liu, W.; Cheng, H.; Chen, S.; Tian, J. Anomalous reflection and vortex beam generation by multi-bit coding acoustic metasurfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 114, 091905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luo, Y.; Jia, Y.; Yao, J.; Wu, D.; Liu, X. Enhanced fractional acoustic vortices by an annulus acoustic metasurface with multi-layered rings. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 2000356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Long, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yang, C.; Ge, J.; Chen, H.; Ren, J. Realization of acoustic spin transport in metasurface waveguides. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, D.-C.; Zhou, Q.X.; Zhu, X.-F.; Xu, Z.; Wu, D.-J. Focused acoustic vortex by an artificial structure with two sets of discrete Archimedean spiral slits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 115, 083501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guo, S.; Guo, X.; Wang, X.; Du, X.; Wu, P.; Bouakaz, A.; Wan, M. Manipulation of nanodroplets via a nonuniform focused acoustic vortex. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020, 13, 034009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fu, Y.; Shen, C.; Zhu, X.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Cummer, S.A.; Xu, Y. Sound vortex diffraction via topological charge in phase gradient metagratings. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, 9876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qian, J.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, S.Q.; Sun, H.X.; Liu, X.J. Reflected acoustic wavefront manipulation by an ultrathin metasurface based on three-dimensional generalized Snell’s law. Appl. Phys. Express 2019, 12, 094001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, D.L.; Waag, R. Propagation and backpropagation for ultrasonic wavefront design. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 1997, 44, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Design of a quasi-3D reflected unit. (a) Schematic of a quasi-3D reflected unit and its x(y)-z cross section. (b) Reflected phase delays created by the quasi-3D reflected unit as a function of tunable depth h0.
Figure 1. Design of a quasi-3D reflected unit. (a) Schematic of a quasi-3D reflected unit and its x(y)-z cross section. (b) Reflected phase delays created by the quasi-3D reflected unit as a function of tunable depth h0.
Micromachines 12 01388 g001
Figure 2. Design of the reflected ABV beam. (a) Schematic of a quasi-3D reflected metasurface of ABV beam, and its (b) theoretical continuous and (c) discrete phase profiles.
Figure 2. Design of the reflected ABV beam. (a) Schematic of a quasi-3D reflected metasurface of ABV beam, and its (b) theoretical continuous and (c) discrete phase profiles.
Micromachines 12 01388 g002
Figure 3. The performance of the reflected ABV beam with n = 1 at 9.0 kHz. (a) Simulated 3D reflected intensity distribution of the ABV beam created by the quasi-3D metasurface, and its corresponding reflected (b) intensity and (c) phase distributions at 5 selected cross sections z = 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 cm. (d) Simulated 3D reflected intensity distribution of the ABV beam created by the theoretical continuous phase profile, and its corresponding reflected (e) intensity and (f) phase distributions at the 5 cross sections.
Figure 3. The performance of the reflected ABV beam with n = 1 at 9.0 kHz. (a) Simulated 3D reflected intensity distribution of the ABV beam created by the quasi-3D metasurface, and its corresponding reflected (b) intensity and (c) phase distributions at 5 selected cross sections z = 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 cm. (d) Simulated 3D reflected intensity distribution of the ABV beam created by the theoretical continuous phase profile, and its corresponding reflected (e) intensity and (f) phase distributions at the 5 cross sections.
Micromachines 12 01388 g003
Figure 4. Simulated acoustic intensity distributions through the ABV beam along lines (a) I, (b) II, and III in Figure 3d.
Figure 4. Simulated acoustic intensity distributions through the ABV beam along lines (a) I, (b) II, and III in Figure 3d.
Micromachines 12 01388 g004
Figure 5. Simulated 3D reflected intensity distributions of the ABV beam created by the quasi-3D metasurface at (a) 8.2, (b) 8.7, (c) 9.2, (d) 9.7, (e) 10.2, and (f) 10.7 kHz. Insets on the right side represent the phase and intensity distributions at a cross section z = 60 cm (red translucent planes).
Figure 5. Simulated 3D reflected intensity distributions of the ABV beam created by the quasi-3D metasurface at (a) 8.2, (b) 8.7, (c) 9.2, (d) 9.7, (e) 10.2, and (f) 10.7 kHz. Insets on the right side represent the phase and intensity distributions at a cross section z = 60 cm (red translucent planes).
Micromachines 12 01388 g005
Figure 6. The performance of the reflected ABV beam with n = 2 at 9.0 kHz. (a) Simulated 3D reflected intensity distribution of the ABV beam created by the quasi-3D metasurface, and its corresponding reflected (b) phase distribution at 3 cross sections z = 20, 40, and 60 cm. (c) Phase delays around in a circle with the radius of 6 cm (black open circles in (b)) as a function of θ at the 3 cross sections.
Figure 6. The performance of the reflected ABV beam with n = 2 at 9.0 kHz. (a) Simulated 3D reflected intensity distribution of the ABV beam created by the quasi-3D metasurface, and its corresponding reflected (b) phase distribution at 3 cross sections z = 20, 40, and 60 cm. (c) Phase delays around in a circle with the radius of 6 cm (black open circles in (b)) as a function of θ at the 3 cross sections.
Micromachines 12 01388 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Qian, J.; Xia, J.-P.; Ge, Y.; Yuan, S.-Q.; Sun, H.-X.; Liu, X.-J. Acoustic Bessel Vortex Beam by Quasi-Three-Dimensional Reflected Metasurfaces. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111388

AMA Style

Wang Y, Qian J, Xia J-P, Ge Y, Yuan S-Q, Sun H-X, Liu X-J. Acoustic Bessel Vortex Beam by Quasi-Three-Dimensional Reflected Metasurfaces. Micromachines. 2021; 12(11):1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yin, Jiao Qian, Jian-Ping Xia, Yong Ge, Shou-Qi Yuan, Hong-Xiang Sun, and Xiao-Jun Liu. 2021. "Acoustic Bessel Vortex Beam by Quasi-Three-Dimensional Reflected Metasurfaces" Micromachines 12, no. 11: 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111388

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop