Next Article in Journal
Correlated Time-0 and Hot-Carrier Stress Induced FinFET Parameter Variabilities: Modeling Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of Microspheres from High-Viscosity Bioink Using a Novel Microfluidic-Based 3D Bioprinting Nozzle
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Graphene Phononic Crystals for Heat Phonon Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suppression of Surface Waviness Error of Fresnel Micro-Structured Mold by Using Non-Integer Rotation Speed Ratio in Parallel Grinding Process
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rolling Nanoelectrode Lithography

1
Centre for Precision Manufacturing, DMEM, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK
2
Key Laboratory for Micro/Nano Technology and System of Liaoning Province, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2020, 11(7), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070656
Submission received: 20 May 2020 / Revised: 25 June 2020 / Accepted: 29 June 2020 / Published: 30 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ultra Precision Technologies for Micromachining)

Abstract

:
Non-uniformity and low throughput issues severely limit the application of nanoelectrode lithography for large area nanopatterning. This paper proposes, for the first time, a new rolling nanoelectrode lithography approach to overcome these challenges. A test-bed was developed to realize uniform pressure distribution over the whole contact area between the roller and the silicon specimen, so that the local oxidation process occurred uniformly over a large area of the specimen. In this work, a brass roller wrapped with a fabricated polycarbonate strip was used as a stamp to generate nanopatterns on a silicon surface. The experimental results show that a uniform pattern transfer for a large area can be achieved with this new rolling nanoelectrode lithography approach. The rolling speed and the applied bias voltage were identified as the primary control parameters for oxide growth. Furthermore, the pattern direction showed no significant influence on the oxide process. We therefore demonstrated that nanoelectrode lithography can be scaled up for large-area nanofabrication by incorporating a roller stamp.

1. Introduction

Nanofabrication over large areas paves the way for the commercial applications of nanotechnology [1]. Large-area nanofabrications are now being used to manufacture many devices and create innovative products for nanoelectronics, optoelectronics, nanophotonics, and other areas. Although conventional photolithography is currently the dominant method of patterning nanoscale features for the microelectronics industries, it has approached its ultimate limits [2,3]. In the last decade, extensive efforts have been devoted to alternative lithography techniques by various research laboratories. Some emerging and existing methods, such as Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography (EUVL) [4], Electron Beam Lithography (EBL) [5], Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) [6], Directed Self Assembly (DSA) [7] and Scanning Probe Lithography (SPL) [8], have demonstrated excellent potential as promising candidates for future industrial nanofabrication. Each technique has its own strengths and limitations. Although electron beam lithography methods have relatively higher resolution, they are limited by low throughput [9]. Similarly, scanning probe lithography techniques need to increase throughput, possibly using a matrix of tips for parallel writing [10,11]. Again, extreme ultraviolet lithography, nanoimprint lithography and directed self-assembly techniques are getting closer to industrial requirements [1]. However, all these technologies are in their development phases and still need further work to overcome some challenges. EUVL has already been installed in various fabs worldwide [12]. The EUVL infrastructure still requires significant improvement in source reliability, line edge roughness (LER), and defectivity [1]. In addition, overlay, defectivity, tool design and placement accuracy remain the main concerns for NIL and DSA technologies [1,13,14,15].
On the other hand, nanoelectrode nanolithography (NEL) has been developed in the laboratory and has been demonstrated as an efficient lithographic tool. This method is based on the spatial confinement of anodic oxidation between a conductive stamp and the specimen surface. When the conductive stamp touches the specimen, a voltage is applied between them. A water bridge is formed between the protrusive parts of the stamp and the specimen. Then the electrochemical reactions occur, which form an oxide film in the touched areas of the specimen. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of a NEL process. This method is robust, reliable, and flexible, and has already been effectively used to fabricate nanostructures on different specimens: silicon [16,17,18], GaAs [19,20] and pentacene layers [21]. However, the NEL process with a flat stamp is not suitable for large area nanopatterning as non-uniformity becomes an issue when they use large stamps. Firstly, it is difficult to achieve a uniform contact between the stamp and the specimen on a large-scale due to disuse of the resist materials [16]. Again, another critical challenge in the NEL process is to maintain uniform pressure over the whole contact area during oxidation. These challenges severely limit the application of NEL for large-area nanopatterning.
This paper aims to establish a new cost-effective nanoelectrode lithography technique and its test-bed for large-area nanofabrication. We propose a rolling nanoelectrode lithography (R-NEL) process, which could significantly improve the pattern transfer uniformity. This method can be advantageous as it enables continuous patterning and easy de-molding in large-area nanofabrication. The roller-based nanopatterning concepts are not new, they have been successfully utilized in thermal/UV nanoimprint lithography techniques for large-area nanofabrication [22,23,24,25,26]. These roller-based manufacturing methods have been recognized to be a high-throughput and low-cost technology. These methods can even fabricate continuous nanopatterns, which make them attractive for various industrial applications [27,28]. However, the application of a roller in NEL is rare due to the challenges in fabricating the conductive roller stamps. In this work, we will implement the proposed R-NEL system and perform the oxidation process on a Si (100) specimen. We will also investigate the influence of experimental parameters such as pattern direction, applied voltage, and rolling speed on the R-NEL process.

2. Experimental Methods

2.1. Description of the R-NEL Process

In the R-NEL system, the roller stamp rolls over the specimen while voltage is applied between the stamp and the specimen, which eventually produces continuous oxide patterns (Figure 2). The introduction of the roller is required to maintain uniform pressure over the whole area. Consequently, the local oxidation process can occur uniformly over a large area of the specimens.
A sequence of process steps was followed to develop a prototype of the R-NEL system (shown in Figure 3). The first step was to fabricate a roller with nano protrusions that can be obtained by several methods. One method is to create patterns directly on the roller surface by diamond turning or electron beam lithography processes. Another way is to wrap a belt or flexible flat stamp around a bare roller. This method is generally the easiest as the belt, or the flexible flat stamp, can easily be fabricated with various patterning techniques. However, wrapping a belt on a roller may leave a seam, which produces an inevitable joint error. In this research, we choose the latter method as it is typically more practical and cost-effective for research purposes. It is also worth noting that a seamless roller stamp should not yield any substantial technical differences, so long as the experimental parameters are the same.
In order to prepare the stamp, a cylindrical roller base was machined from brass materials on an ultra-precision diamond turning machine. The length and diameter of the roller base were selected as 100 mm and 13 mm, respectively. Then the roller base was first wrapped with a 2 mm thick and 10 mm wide layer of synthetic rubber (polyisobutylene and 2 mol% isoprene), which increases the elasticity of the stamp as well as the contact area (Figure 4a). After that, a polycarbonate strip (100 μm thick) was peeled from a DVD-R and cleaned with an ethanol solution (Figure 4b). The strip adhered to the rubber surface (Figure 4c). The polycarbonate strip was composed of spiral guide grooves with a periodicity of 780 nm, a 350 nm linewidth at half height, and a 100 nm depth. The strip was covered with a reflective metal layer of aluminum, which makes the stamp electrically conductive. The overall diameter and width of the nanostructured area of the roller became 17.2 mm and 10 mm, respectively. The atomic force microscope (AFM) image of the nanostructures showed no degradation after being peeled from the DVD and adhered to the roller (Figure 5).
In the next step, an air bushing (13.02 mm inner diameter) with the roller stamp was mounted on the Z-axis of a three-axis translational motion control system. The air bushing distributes compressed air through a tubular media containing millions of sub-micron holes, which holds the roller and enables it to rotate frictionlessly. The specimen was placed on a metal base that can move along the X and Y axes. The motions of these three axes were controlled by a computer, which allowed the correct positioning of the specimen relative to the roller stamp. The roller descended to make gentle contact with the specimen. When the specimen moved along the X-axis, the roller also rotated due to adhesive force at the contact between them. Thus, the roller rolled over the specimen and fabricated the whole specimen surface. A controller was used to maintain a constant airflow at the required pressure. A humidifier was used to maintain the relative humidity inside the enclosure. A hygrometer and a weighing scale were also used to measure the relative humidity and the force applied on the roller, respectively. Figure 6 shows an overview of the implemented R-NEL system.

2.2. Experimental Details

All the experiments were carried out at room temperature with a relative humidity of 80%. The pressure of the compressed air into the air bushing was maintained at 60 psi. An atomic force microscope (DI Dimension 3100) was used to inspect the nanostructures on the specimen surfaces. To run an experimental operation, the roller was moved towards the specimen first by using the jogging of the controller interface (Mach3) until the force reached the desired value. Then a simple program defined by a G Code was run to move the specimen in the x-direction at a specific speed.

2.3. Specimen Preparation

In these experiments, specimens of p-doped silicon (100) with resistivity ρ = 10–15 Ω-cm were used. These specimens were cleaned with ultrasound in an NH4OH/H2O2/H2O (1:1:5) solution for 10 min. The cleaning process was repeated thrice to achieve optimal cleaning with a low density of particles on the surface. After cleaning, the specimens were blown dry with a N2 gas jet.

2.4. Contact Area Calculation

Obtaining a precise contact area between the stamp and the specimen is crucial to determine the rolling speed needed for the oxidation process. The actual contact area during oxidation is only a line or a finite rectangular area along the roller stamp in contact with the specimen, as shown in Figure 7. The size of the contact area, which can be determined by the Hertz theory [29], depends upon some parameters such as the applied force, roller dimensions, and the properties of the roller and the specimen.
By using the Hertz theory, the half-width (b) of the rectangular contact area can be written as [30]:
b = 4 F R 1 v 1 2 E 1 + 1 v 2 2 E 2 π L
where E1 and E2 are the elastic moduli for the roller stamp, and the specimen and ν1 and ν2 are the Poisson’s ratios, respectively. R is the radius of the roller stamp, and L and F refer to the length of the contact area and the applied force, respectively.
The rolling speed can be calculated by using the following formula:
R o l l i n g   s p e e d = 2 b t
where t is the time required for the oxidation process.
The maximum limit for the rolling speed can be obtained by considering the minimum required time for the oxidation process. To evaluate the contact area, oxidation was performed with this roller stamp for one minute without any rotation of it. By careful visualization of the oxide area with the AFM, the value appeared to be ~1.1 mm, which is very close to the calculative value of 1.15 mm (calculations are available as Supporting Information). Hence, a rolling speed of 0.50 mm/min ensures an exposure time of ~2 min.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Patterning by R-NEL

The first experiment was carried out using the roller stamp, where the patterns were orthogonal to the moving specimen direction. Figure 8 shows the result of the oxidation after applying a 1 N force and a voltage of 36 V at a rolling speed of 0.50 mm/min. To characterize the surface morphology, we calculated the power spectral density (PSD) (shown in Figure 8c) and the roughness of the surface by using the characterization methodology proposed in [31]. The characteristic parameters are shown in Table 1. A uniform pattern transfer was achieved with an oxide mean height of 2.1 nm, a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 195 nm and a periodicity of 780 nm on an area of about 8 mm × 10 mm. The root mean square (RMS) roughness for the oxide lines and the spaces was found to be 217.44 pm and 179.34 pm respectively, while the skewness and the excess kurtosis were estimated as 0.8775 and 0.2828. These results indicate a significant improvement in pattern uniformity compared to the other results obtained with the conventional NEL process [32,33].
It is also worth mentioning that the seam of the roller used in the experiments restricts the length of the specimen area to be patterned. However, this should not make any qualitative technical differences, as mentioned before. Therefore, it is shown that the new R-NEL system can achieve uniform pattern replication, maintaining the same periodicity.

3.2. Influence of the Pattern Directions

The oxidation processes performed in the previous section used roller stamps where the patterns were orthogonal to the moving specimen direction (Figure 9a). It would be interesting to see how the orientation of patterns affects the oxidation process. To do this, an oxidation experiment was carried out with the same experimental parameters where the patterns were parallel to the moving specimen (Figure 9b). An oxide pattern of 2 nm height and 190 nm FWHM were achieved while maintaining the same periodicity (780 nm) (shown in Figure 10). These oxide patterns were very similar to the pattern obtained with the roller stamp, where the patterns were orthogonal to the moving specimen direction. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no significant influence of pattern directions on the oxidation process in the R-NEL system.

3.3. Effect of the Rolling Speed and the Bias Voltage

The rolling speed and the applied voltage are two major parameters that can be altered to optimize the R-NEL process. Hence, we studied the effect of bias voltage and rolling speed on oxide growth. Applying the constant voltage (36 V), Figure 11a–c show the topographic images of the specimens for three different rolling speeds (0.25, 0.50, and 1 mm/min). The height and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the oxides are represented concerning the rolling speeds where each point of the graph represents an average of a few values obtained from the same specimen (shown in Figure 11d). It is shown that the oxide patterns have a linear increase in height with a decrease in the rolling speed. It can be explained by the fact that, as the rolling speed increases, the exposure time for the contact area decreases. Previous studies show that the height of the oxides increases with the oxidation time [33]. However, D. Stievenard et al. showed that the oxide height varies as log(1/speed) with the tip writing speed in the AFM oxidation lithography process [34]. In the R-NEL process, it shows linear rather than logarithmic dependency on rolling speed.
Again, it can be seen from Figure 11d that the width (FWHM) increases with decreasing rolling speed. In other words, low rolling speeds made broader oxide patterns. The growth behavior of oxide width with the rolling speed can be explained considering two models proposed for AFM oxidation. Firstly, Kuramochi et al. suggested ionic diffusion as the main reason for the lateral oxide growth during the long exposure time [35]. Ionic diffusion takes place through the adsorbed water layer when the grown oxide starts preventing the current flow under the stamp protrusion (tip). In other research, Bloeß et al. showed that the size of the water bridge limits the lateral oxide growth [36]. Although the size of the water bridge is influenced by the electric field and the relative humidity, the size of the contact area remains the main factor. Therefore, it can be concluded that the oxide width increases with the exposure time due to ionic diffusion until a certain value determined by the size of the water bridge.
In order to investigate the effect of applied voltage, the oxidation was performed with a bias voltage ranging from 26 to 46 V at a rolling speed of 0.50 mm/min. Figure 12 shows that the oxide height increases linearly with the applied voltage. This outcome is also in good agreement with the results obtained in [37]. Additionally, the aspect ratio (height/width) of the oxide lines is one of the essential factors both in mask fabrication and lithography processes for the semiconductor industry. It was found that the aspect ratio also increases as the rolling speed decreases (from 0.0037 for 1 mm/min to 0.015 for 0.25 mm/min). Therefore, precise control of the aspect ratio of the oxide lines can be achieved by careful optimization of the experimental parameters, such as rolling speed and the applied voltage. Furthermore, the throughput can easily be increased by using a roller stamp with a higher radius.

4. Concluding Remarks

A rolling nanoelectrode lithography approach was proposed for the first time in this paper to fabricate nanostructures on silicon specimens. A prototype system was designed and implemented where a polycarbonate strip wrapped with a brass roller base was used as the stamp. This new system requires a much smaller force since it proceeds in a small area perpendicular to the specimen moving direction. A uniform pattern transfer for the large area was achieved with this new R-NEL system. The rolling speed and the applied bias voltage were identified as the primary control parameters for oxide growth. Experimental studies show the linear dependence of the oxide height as a function of the applied voltage, whereas the oxide height is inversely proportional to the rolling speed. The effect of the pattern direction was also identified, and shows no significant differences. These results show that the new R-NEL system allows the control of the parameters involved in the oxidation process, and this could enable the use of the nanoelectrode lithography process in large area fabrication and electronic device mass production.

Supplementary Information

The Supporting Information is available from the University of Strathclyde KnowledgeBase at https://doi.org/10.15129/10de90c2-f34d-4d18-ba4d-9dfc715cd12e.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S. and X.L.; methodology, R.M.M.H.; software, R.M.M.H.; validation, R.M.M.H., X.L. and J.S.; formal analysis, R.M.M.H.; investigation, R.M.M.H.; resources, R.M.M.H.; data curation, R.M.M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.M.H.; writing—review and editing, X.L.; visualization, R.M.M.H.; supervision, X.L.; project administration, X.L.; funding acquisition, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by EPSRC (EP/K018345/1, EP/T024844/1) and the Royal Society-NSFC international exchange program (IEC/NSFC/181474).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. Hasan, R.M.M.; Luo, X. Promising lithography techniques for next-generation logic devices. Nanomanuf. Metrol. 2018, 1, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Sun, S.; Leggett, G.L. Matching the resolution of electron beam lithography by scanning near-field photolithography. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1381–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, X.; Arce, G.R. Pixel-based simultaneous source and mask optimization for resolution enhancement in optical lithography. Opt. Express. 2009, 17, 5783–5793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wagner, C.; Harned, N. EUV lithography: Lithography gets extreme. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 24–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pala, N.; Karabiyik, M. Electron Beam Lithography (EBL). In Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology; Bhushan, B., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, L.J. Nanoimprint Lithography: Methods and material requirements. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 495–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Koo, K.; Ahn, H.; Kim, S.-W.; Ryu, D.Y.; Russell, T.P. Directed self-assembly of block copolymers in the extreme: Guiding microdomains from the small to the large. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 9059–9071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garcia, R.; Knoll, A.; Riedo, E. Advanced scanning probe lithography. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Biswas, A.; Bayer, I.S.; Biris, A.S.; Wang, T.; Dervishi, E.; Faupel, F. Advances in top–down and bottom–up surface nanofabrication: Techniques, applications & future prospects. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 170, 2–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Santschi, C.J.; Polesel-Maris, J.; Brugger, J.; Heinzelmann, H. Nanofabrication: Fundamentals and Applications; Tseng, A.A., Ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2008; pp. 65–126. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, X.F.; Liu, C. Multifunctional probe array for nano patterning and imaging. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1867–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Phillips, M.C. EUV Extendibility at 0.33 and 0.55NA. In Proceedings of the SPIE, International Conference on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography, Monterey, CA, USA, 16 October 2019; Volume 11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Resnick, J.; Choi, J. A review of nanoimprint lithography for high-volume semiconductor device manufacturing. Adv. Opt. Technol. 2017, 6, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pathangia, H.; Vaida, V.; Chana, B.T.; Vandenbroecka, N.; Lib, J.; Hongb, S.E.; Caob, Y.; Durairajb, B.; Linb, G.; Somervellc, M.; et al. Block co-polymer contributions to the defectivity and roughness performance of the 14nm half-pitch LiNe flow @ imec. In Proceedings of the SPIE, San Jose, CA, USA, 23–25 February 2016; pp. 9777–10015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Muramatsu, M.; Nishi, T.; You, G.; Ido, Y.; Kitano, T. Pattern defect reduction for chemo-epitaxy DSA process. In Proceedings of the Advances in Patterning Materials and Processes XXXVI, San Jose, CA, USA, 24–28 February 2019; Volume 10960, p. 109600W. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.F.; Chen, K.H.; Ootera, Y.; Toshiyoshi, H.; Fujita, H. Nanoelectrode lithography using flexible conductive molds. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2015, 121, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Albonetti, C.J.; Martinez, J.; Losilla, N.S.; Greco, P.; Cavallini, M.; Borgatti, F.; Montecchi, M.; Pasquali, L.; Garcia, R.; Biscarini, F. Parallel-local anodic oxidation of silicon surfaces by soft stamps. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 435303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Losilla, N.S.; Martínez, J.; García, R. Large area nanoscale patterning of silicon surfaces by parallel local oxidation. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yokoo, A.; Sasaki, S. Oxidation patterning of GaAs by nanoelectrode lithography. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1 Regul. Pap. Short Notes Rev. Pap. 2005, 44, 1119–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Okada, Y.; Iuchi, Y.; Kawabe, M.; Harris, S.J. Basic properties of GaAs oxide generated by scanning probe microscope tip-induced nano-oxidation process. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 88, 1136–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Losilla, N.S.; Martinez, J.; Bystrenova, E.; Greco, P.; Biscarini, F.; García, R. Patterning pentacene surfaces by local oxidation nanolithography. Ultramicroscopy 2010, 110, 729–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ahn, S.H.; Guo, L.J. Large-area roll-to-roll and roll-to-plate nanoimprint lithography: A step toward high-throughput application of continuous nanoimprinting. Acs Nano. Pap. 2009, 3, 2304–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lan, S.; Song, J.-H.; Lee, M.G.; Ni, J.; Lee, N.K.; Lee, H.-J. Continuous roll-to-flat thermal imprinting process for large area micro-pattern replication on polymer substrate, Microelectron. Eng. Vol. 2010, 87, 2596–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, J.-H.; Lee, H.-J.; Lan, S.; Lee, N.-K.; Lee, G.-A.; Lee, T.-J.; Choi, S.; Bae, S.-M. Development of the roll type incremental micro pattern imprint system for large area pattern replication. In Proceedings of the IPAS, Berlin, Germany, 14 February 2010; pp. 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Jeans, A.; Almanza-Workman, M.; Cobene, R.; Elder, R.; Garcia, R.; Gomez-Pancorbo, F.; Jackson, W.; Jam, M.; Kim, H.; Kwon, O.; et al. Advances in roll-to-roll imprint lithography for display applications. In Proceedings of the SPIE, San Jose, CA, USA, 21–25 February 2010; Volume 7637, p. 763719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhong, Z.W.; Shan, X.C. Microstructure formation via roll-to-roll UV embossing using a flexible mould made from a laminated polymer-copper film. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2012, 22, 085010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kooy, N.; Mohamed, K.; Pin, L.T.; Guan, O.S. A review of roll-to-roll nanoimprint lithography. Nano. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Huang, R.; Zhang, X.; Liu, K. Micromachining of Roller Mold for Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing. In Micro and Nano Fabrication Technology; Yan, J., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; Volume 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hertz, H. Über die berührung fester elastischer Körper (On the contact of rigid elastic solids). In Miscellaneous Papers Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 92; Schaott, J., Ed.; Macmillan: London, UK, 1896; p. 156. [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams, J. Contact between surfaces. In Engineering Tribology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005; pp. 73–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kontziampasis, D.V.; Constantoudis, V.; Gogolides, E. Plasma Directed organization of nanodots on polymers: Effects of polymer type and etching time on morphology and order. Plasma Process. Polym. 2012, 9, 866–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yokoo, A. Nanoelectrode lithography. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 2 Lett. 2003, 42, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cavallini, M.; Mei, P.; Biscarini, F.; García, R. Parallel writing by local oxidation nanolithography with submicrometer resolution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 5286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Stiévenard, D.; Fontaine, P.A.; Dubois, E. Nanooxidation using a scanning probe microscope: An analytical model based on field induced oxidation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 70, 3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kuramochi, H.; Ando, K.; Yokoyama, H. Effect of humidity on nano-oxidation of p-Si(0 0 1) surface. Surf. Sci. 2003, 542, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bloeß, H.; Staikov, G.; Schultze, J.W. AFM induced formation of SiO2 structures in the electrochemical nanocell. Electrochimica Acta 2001, 47, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hasan, R.M.M.; Politano, O.; Luo, X. ReaxFF Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of Nanoelectrode Lithography Oxidation Process on Silicon (100) Surface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 496, 143679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the nanoelectrode nanolithography (NEL) process on a silicon surface.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the nanoelectrode nanolithography (NEL) process on a silicon surface.
Micromachines 11 00656 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of the proposed rolling NEL system.
Figure 2. Schematic of the proposed rolling NEL system.
Micromachines 11 00656 g002
Figure 3. Process steps for the rolling NEL system.
Figure 3. Process steps for the rolling NEL system.
Micromachines 11 00656 g003
Figure 4. (a) roller with a rubber band. (b) peeled polycarbonate strip. (c) completed roller stamp.
Figure 4. (a) roller with a rubber band. (b) peeled polycarbonate strip. (c) completed roller stamp.
Micromachines 11 00656 g004
Figure 5. (a) Atomic force microscope (AFM) topographic image of the roller stamp. (b) Line profile of the AFM image.
Figure 5. (a) Atomic force microscope (AFM) topographic image of the roller stamp. (b) Line profile of the AFM image.
Micromachines 11 00656 g005
Figure 6. Overview of the implemented rolling nanoelectrode nanolithography (R-NEL) system.
Figure 6. Overview of the implemented rolling nanoelectrode nanolithography (R-NEL) system.
Micromachines 11 00656 g006
Figure 7. Contact area between the roller stamp and the specimen.
Figure 7. Contact area between the roller stamp and the specimen.
Micromachines 11 00656 g007
Figure 8. (a,b) Atomic force microscope (AFM) topography image of the oxide lines made by R-NEL. (c) Power spectral density (PSD) of the AFM image shown in (b). (d) Profile of the lines marked in the image (b).
Figure 8. (a,b) Atomic force microscope (AFM) topography image of the oxide lines made by R-NEL. (c) Power spectral density (PSD) of the AFM image shown in (b). (d) Profile of the lines marked in the image (b).
Micromachines 11 00656 g008
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of pattern directions. (a) Orthogonal direction; (b) Parallel direction.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of pattern directions. (a) Orthogonal direction; (b) Parallel direction.
Micromachines 11 00656 g009
Figure 10. Parallel pattern direction. (a) AFM topography image of the oxide lines. (b) Profile of the lines marked in the image (a).
Figure 10. Parallel pattern direction. (a) AFM topography image of the oxide lines. (b) Profile of the lines marked in the image (a).
Micromachines 11 00656 g010
Figure 11. (ac) AFM topographic images. (d) Relationship between the rolling speed and oxide height (left side of the graph) and full width at half maximum (FWHM) (right side of the graph).
Figure 11. (ac) AFM topographic images. (d) Relationship between the rolling speed and oxide height (left side of the graph) and full width at half maximum (FWHM) (right side of the graph).
Micromachines 11 00656 g011
Figure 12. Height of oxide lines at different applied bias voltages.
Figure 12. Height of oxide lines at different applied bias voltages.
Micromachines 11 00656 g012
Table 1. Metrological characteristics of the silicon surface after the NEL process.
Table 1. Metrological characteristics of the silicon surface after the NEL process.
ParametersValue
Peak Wavenumber (1/λ) (nm−1)0.001282
Periodicity (λ) (nm)780
Average Oxide Height (nm)2.1 ± 0.045
Average FWHM (nm)195 ± 35
RMS Roughness in Oxide Lines (pm)217.44 ± 33.34
RMS Roughness in Spaces (pm)179.34 ± 7.16
Skewness0.8775 ± 0.2854
Excess Kurtosis0.2828 ± 1.03

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hasan, R.M.M.; Luo, X.; Sun, J. Rolling Nanoelectrode Lithography. Micromachines 2020, 11, 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070656

AMA Style

Hasan RMM, Luo X, Sun J. Rolling Nanoelectrode Lithography. Micromachines. 2020; 11(7):656. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070656

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hasan, Rashed Md. Murad, Xichun Luo, and Jining Sun. 2020. "Rolling Nanoelectrode Lithography" Micromachines 11, no. 7: 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070656

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop