Next Article in Journal
Ciguatera Fish Poisoning in the Caribbean Sea and Atlantic Ocean: Reconciling the Multiplicity of Ciguatoxins and Analytical Chemistry Approach for Public Health Safety
Previous Article in Journal
Discovering Venom-Derived Drug Candidates Using Differential Gene Expression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Study of Ochratoxin A Exposure through the Intake of Cereal Products in Two Climatic Moroccan Regions

1
Department of Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine (IAV), Rabat P.O. Box 6202, Morocco
2
BIOMARE Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences P.O. Box 20, Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida 24000, Morocco
3
CBQF—Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina—Laboratório Associado, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal
4
LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
5
ALiCE—Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
6
Risk Assessment Department, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 94701 Maisons-Alfort, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2023, 15(7), 452; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15070452
Submission received: 16 May 2023 / Revised: 3 July 2023 / Accepted: 7 July 2023 / Published: 9 July 2023

Abstract

:
The present study aims to compare ochratoxin A (OTA) exposure through the intake of three cereal derivative products (bread, pasta and semolina) in two different Moroccan climatic regions (littoral and continental). OTA weekly intakes from cereal products were calculated using a deterministic approach for each region. Results showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) of OTA exposure between the two regions. Indeed, the median OTA exposure was estimated at 48.97 ng/kg b.w./week in the littoral region, while it was estimated at 6.36 ng/kg b.w./week in the continental region. The probabilistic approach showed that, due to uncertainties, the 95th percentile of weekly OTA exposure associated with the three cereal products ranged from 66.18 to 137.79 (95% CI) with a median of 97.44 ng/kg body weight (b.w.)/week. Compared to the threshold of 100 ng/kg b.w./week, 95% of the cumulative distributions predicted an exceedance frequency between 0.42 and 17.30% (95% CI), with an exceedance frequency median of 4.43%. Results showed that cereal derivatives constitute an important vector of OTA exposure and cause a significant exceedance of toxicological reference value among large consumers in the littoral region, which suggests the urgency of reconsidering the maximum regulatory limit (MRL) set for OTA (3 µg/kg) in cereal derivatives by Moroccan authorities.
Key Contribution: Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin produced by toxigenic fungi on foods. The purpose of this work was to compare OTA exposure levels through the intake of three cereal products in two Moroccan areas. Results showed that cereal derivatives constitute an important vector of OTA exposure, which suggests the urgency of revising the maximum regulatory limit set for OTA by Moroccan authorities.

1. Introduction

Mycotoxins are chemical secondary metabolites of different fungi and are considered as natural contaminants of cereals, so their presence is often inevitable. The most common mycotoxins of concern to humans and livestock include aflatoxins, citrinin, ochratoxins, fumonisins, patulin, zearalenone, nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, fumonisins, and ergot alkaloids [1], and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is confirmed as carcinogenic to humans and animals [2].
Ochratoxins are among the worrying mycotoxins and are natural metabolites of toxigenic fungal species of the genus Aspergillus and Penicillium, mainly produced by Penicillium verrucossum in temperate climates and by Aspergillus ochraceus in warm regions [3]. Ochratoxin A (OTA) is the most toxic of the ochratoxins [4]. OTA was isolated in 1965 and chemically characterized [5]. Its chemical formula contains a molecule of 3-methyl-5-chloro-8 hydroxy-3,4 dihydroisocoumarin linked by a peptide bond, at the level of its C7 carboxyl group, to the amine group of L-β-phenylalanine [6]. Recent reports have stated that black Aspergilli species (A. niger aggregate and A. carbonarius), are sources of OTA in food products, especially cereals [7] and other dried foods, such as dried palm dates [8].
Toxicological studies on laboratory animals have shown that this toxin may have several potential effects, such as nephrotoxicity, genotoxicity, immunosuppression, teratogenicity, neurotoxicity and carcinogenicity [9]. Recent reports revealed a proven carcinogenic effect of OTA on the kidneys, liver and intestine in different laboratory animals [10]. Although OTA was associated for a long time to Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN) disease [11], recent evidence indicates that this pathology is due to aristolochic acid as the causative agent [12].
The genotoxicity of OTA is still debated and there is not enough strong evidence to establish its genotoxicity; some studies suggest that OTA carcinogenicity may be due to mechanisms other than direct DNA damage, such as oxidative stress or epigenetics changes [13]. It has been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a possible human carcinogenic in group 2B [14]. A provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) was set by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) for humans at 100 ng OTA/kg bodyweight (b.w.) per week (i.e., 14 ng/kg b.w./d), based on nephrotoxic effects observed in pigs in a 90-day sub-chronic toxicities study [15].
The European food safety authority (EFSA) derived a PTWI of 120 ng OTA kg body weight per week (i.e., 17 ng OTA/kg b.w./day) by adopting an approach based on the existence of a threshold of toxicity in the absence of conclusive evidence that OTA binds to DNA. The PTWI was derived based on the lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) of 8 µg/kg b.w./day for early markers of renal toxicity in pigs (the most sensitive animal species), and applying a composite uncertainty factor of 450 for uncertainties in the extrapolation of experimental data from animals to humans, as well as for intra-species variability [9]. More recently, based on new studies, the EFSA adopted a benchmark dose (BMDL10) of 4.73 µg/kg b.w./day calculated from the renal lesions observed in pigs for the characterization of non-neoplastic effects. For characterization of neoplastic effects, a BMDL10 of 14.5 µg/kg b.w./day was calculated from renal tumors observed in rats [16].
Humans are exposed to OTA through consumption of food products contaminated either during primary production or during storage [17]. OTA can be inhaled in dust particles or spores from contaminated grains and can present a risk for workers in the agricultural and agri-food industry. Although OTA can be absorbed through the skin, this exposure pathway is less common. OTA has been found mainly in cereals (wheat, corn, rice, rye and oats), coffee, cocoa, beans, peas, peanuts and dried fruits, and offal and meat from animals fed with contaminated feed [18]. Due to its thermal stability, OTA removal or reduction from contaminated processed cereals is very difficult. Consequently, humans are frequently exposed to OTA through cereal products intake [19]. Recently, several reports have been published on OTA exposure through food and cereal intake, especially from China [20], Ghana [7], Chile [21], Vietnam [22], Lebanon [23], and Tunisia [24] etc.
In Morocco, several studies have reported the occurrence of OTA in various food products including cereals and their derivatives [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Morocco’s food consumption model is still largely dominated by cereals, mainly soft wheat. The latter is consumed at every meal, as a side to the basic tajine dish, a vegetable and/or legume-based stew, with or without meat [33].
New regulations have been adopted by Moroccan authorities to set maximum regulatory limits (MRL) of certain mycotoxins in foodstuffs due to their associated health and economic negative impacts. These regulations have recently been repealed and modified by the annex of the Joint Decree n°2410-22 of 14 September 2022 [34]. Thus, Moroccan regulations have set the MRL for OTA at 5 and 3 µg/kg in raw cereals and cereal derivatives, respectively, which are similar to those previously adopted by the European Union in 2006 and repealed in 2023 [35].
More recently, the European Union has adopted new regulations (EC No 1370/2022) for OTA in foodstuffs for which no maximum level has been established yet, and which contribute to OTA human exposure. Thus, the MRL of OTA in bakery wares, cereal snacks and breakfast cereal has been lowered by European countries to 2 µg/kg, since these products are considered as major vectors of OTA human exposure [36].
On average, a Moroccan consumes 185 kg of cereals per year [37], compared to a world average of 152 kg [38]. A recent study of our research group showed that bread and cereal derivatives can constitute, under certain scenarios, an important vector of the human exposure to OTA [39]. However, this study focused on national average OTA contributions, and the regional contributions were not considered. As an extension, the regional factor was included in the present study since Morocco, a Mediterranean and North African country, is known for its climate with high-annual variations in temperature and recorded rainfall, and has several different climatic conditions that may influence mycotoxin levels in cereals and derivatives, resulting in an uneven distribution of risk between regions.
Fungal infection and colonization, as well as mycotoxin production, are affected by both biotic (grain maturity, pest damage, fungal species) and abiotic factors, such as temperature, water stress, relative humidity and water activity. These factors are responsible for infection and colonization of cereals by mycotoxigenic fungi, and further contamination with mycotoxins. It has been assumed that fungal growth and mycotoxin synthesis depend on the environmental and meteorological conditions which vary from year to year and region to region. This climatic variability can lead to the infection of cereal crops by toxigenic fungi, which then produce mycotoxins and influence the quality of the harvest [40].
Thus, the purpose of this study is to assess Moroccan adults’ exposure to OTA from the consumption of three cereal products (bread, pasta and semolina) collected in two different climatic areas (continental and littoral) in the country, and to check if these products, by their own, might lead to exceedances of the toxicological reference dose of JECFA (PTWI, 100 ng/Kg b.w./week) in the two Moroccan regions, where the climate differs considerably.

2. Results

2.1. Analytical Results

Results of OTA levels in analyzed samples of cereal products are provided in Table 1. As shown, the maximum OTA levels were registered in samples of semolina (14.13 µg/kg) and bread (7.2 µg/kg) collected from Tétouan (littoral) and Marrakech (continental), respectively.
In the littoral region, the mean contamination OTA level of bread was higher (1.32 ± 0.53 µg/kg) compared to semolina and pasta. While in the continental region, the mean OTA level in bread remains much lower (0.05 ± 0.03 µg/kg). In this region, semolina recorded the highest mean level of OTA contamination (0.61 ± 0.80 µg/kg). Overall, and apart from the type of cereal derivative, the Littoral region recorded an average OTA contamination of 0.82 ± 0.06 µg/kg, which is high compared to the continental one (0.36 ± 0.01 µg/kg). In this region, the percentage of contaminated samples remains low (16.1%), compared to 45.3% registered in the littoral.
Regarding the regulatory limits set for OTA in cereal derivatives, there were eight bread samples (7%) from the littoral area and two semolina samples (1.7%) from the continental area that exceeded the MRL of 3 µg/kg set by European legislation and Moroccan authorities [34].

2.2. Deterministic Approach

The EWI (Exposure Weekly Intake) was deterministically calculated for different percentiles of consumption as 25th percentile (P25), 50th percentile (P50), 75th percentile (P75) and 95th percentile (P95) for the two regions based on the obtained data (Table 2). The mean contamination was used in all exposure calculations as it represents a good estimate of long-term contamination, and because the objective is to assess chronic OTA exposure.
The estimated median exposure was 48.97 ng/kg b.w./week in the littoral region, which represents 48.97% of the PTWI. In the continental region, the observed median of exposure was estimated at 6.36 ng/kg b.w./week, equivalent to 6.36% of the PTWI. In the littoral region, cereal derivatives contribute significantly to OTA exposure, compared to the continental region, where this contribution remains much lower (more than seven times less).
At the highest percentile (P95), it is noted that the PTWI is exceeded among large consumers of cereal derivatives in the littoral region (114.3%). Bread alone contributes for 103.7%. This exceedance of the PTWI is observed even for low levels of consumption of semolina and pasta (P25). In contrast, in the continental region, the EWI remains, in the vast majority of cases, significantly lower than the EWI in the littoral region (p < 0.05).

2.3. Probabilistic Approach

The probabilistic calculation was carried out for the littoral region, where the PTWI was exceeded at the highest percentile (114.3 ng/kg b.w./week).
Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the distribution of weekly consumption of the three foods, as well as the observed OTA concentrations. Thus, it seems that the mean consumption of cereal derivatives in the littoral region is higher compared to the national average which is 0.03 kg/kg b.w./week. This is probably due to the fact that dietary habits and the standard of living in this region are where these products still constitute the basic ration. In addition, bread seems to be the most OTA-contaminated cereal derivative, compared to the other cereal products investigated in this study, namely semolina and pasta (Figure 2). This level of bread contamination observed in the littoral region is also higher than the national average contamination level (0.28 µg/kg) previously reported by Tabarani et al. [39].
Figure 3 shows the distribution of the average OTA concentrations for the three foods obtained with the 1000 draws with replacement, and illustrates both variability and uncertainty.
Figure 4 shows the cumulative distribution of OTA exposures associated with the consumption of the three foods. Indeed, in this figure, one can have the superposition of 1000 cumulative distributions, each illustrating the variability linked to the differences in the consumption of the three foods between individuals, whereas the differences between these thousand distributions illustrate the uncertainty associated with the sampling of individuals and analyzed food. The percentiles of the EWI were derived from the cumulative distributions shown in this figure.
Table 3 provides the P50, P75 and P95 of the probabilistic EWI with their confidence interval (representing the uncertainty). The 95th percentile of weekly OTA exposure associated with the three foods (ng/kg body weight) is estimated to be between 66.18 and 137.79 (95% CI), with a median of 97.44.
Compared to the PTWI of 100 ng/kg b.w./week, the frequency of exceedance is estimated between 0.42 and 17.30% (95% CI), with a median of exceedance frequency of 4.43%. The exceedance of the PTWI is essentially due to the consumption of bread. Indeed, the frequency of exceedance changes only very little when the exposures linked to the other two foods are eliminated.

3. Discussion

Cereal derivatives are the most important source of food for the Moroccan population and around the world, i.e., it represents a staple food. This population continues to grow with an increasing demand for these commodities. In the country, harvested or imported cereals are generally stored in specific conditions to guarantee a continuous supply throughout the year. During storage, economic losses can become very significant due to the reduction in grain quality. Grain spoilage caused by fungal contamination results in grain loss that can occur during storage, pre-harvest and post-harvest conditions, which are controlled by environmental factors such as water activity (aw), temperature and rainfall. The influence of climatic conditions and OTA production has been reported [41]. Furthermore, it has been shown that elevated CO2 concentration in the Mediterranean climate may result in an increased risk of OTA contamination [42]. Conversely, Cheng and Van der Fels-Klerx reported that the risk of OTA production in cereals may increase as a result of inadequate storage and transport conditions across changing climate zones [43].
The higher consumption of bread compared to pasta and semolina leads to increased exposure of the inhabitants of the littoral region to high levels of OTA. This exposure appears to be higher than that observed in other countries from similar products. Indeed, this exposure was observed at 0.30 ng/kg b.w./day in Portugal [44], at 0.36 ng/kg b.w./day in Germany [45], at 1.6 ng/kg b.w./day in Spain [46], at 1.63 ng/kg b.w./day in Canada [47] and at 5.0–24.9 ng/kg b.w./day in Tunisia, indicating a high degree of OTA exposure in the Tunisian population [24].
In Lebanon, where the climate is similar to Morocco, especially in the costal Mediterranean zones, the total OTA exposure in large consumers (95th percentile) was estimated from 47 food products at 13.6 ng/kg b.w./day [48], a value very close to the PTWI of JECFA (i.e., 14 ng/kg b.w./day). The percentage contribution of cereal derivatives to this exposure was 35.2%, or approximately 33 ng/kg b.w./week, which remains lower than that observed in the Moroccan coastal region. This could be attributed to the consumption level of cereal derivatives, which remains different in the two countries. Furthermore, the Joint FAO/WHO Committee (JECFA) has established in 2008, an exposure of 1.14–2.43 ng/kg b.w./day from the same products based on European data. Indeed, EFSA estimated a maximum OTA exposure from several foods that ranges from 2.53 to 17.79 ng/kg b.w./day. The largest contributors to this dietary exposure to OTA were canned meat, cheese, and cereals and cereal-based products [16].
The significantly high average OTA intakes in the littoral region seems to be partly linked to the OTA contamination level of bread, which remains the most consumed cereal derivative. The climate of this region seems to offer favorable conditions for a significant production of this mycotoxin. High-OTA levels were previously reported in bread collected from the region of Casablanca (coastal area), located on the Atlantic Ocean (13.6 µg/kg) by Zinedine et al. [29].
Bread seems to be the most important vector of exposure to OTA in the littoral region, where exceeding the PTWI was observed. This important contribution of bread to the exposure was also reported in the second total diet study conducted by ANSES [49], which showed that bread and dry bread products appear as the main contributor to OTA exposure (20 and 80%, respectively) in France.
For the estimation of exposure using the deterministic approach, it was assumed that the consumption of the three food products were independent, which is not the case. It is indeed unlikely that an individual will consume the maximum quantity of all the foodstuffs considered. This simplification leads to an overestimation of OTA exposure. The probabilistic approach considers the issue of overestimation, as it estimates the exposure on an individual-by-individual basis. In addition, the used probabilistic approach allowed the consideration of both variability and uncertainty. It should be clarified that the probabilistic approach of risk assessment remains a rigorous technique and its use provides the means to improve risk management decisions. However, given the increased analytical demands associated with the use of this technique, probabilistic risk assessment should only be used when the results will influence decision-making [50].
The estimated percentiles of exposure are lower than the one estimated with the deterministic approach. However, the probabilistic approach is based only on 24 h recall of food consumption and ignores the intra-individual variability that might still lead to a certain overestimation of the EWI.
Because bread is a daily staple food, it is expected that the intra-individual variability will not be very large. Consideration of intra-individual variability should not substantially reduce the estimated exposures. In any case, the results are rather robust with respect to the relevance of bread as a source of OTA exposure in the littoral region.
Overall, it is strongly recommended that measures be taken to prevent contamination of bread in this region through good agricultural practices, cereal storage practices, and hygiene and bread-making practices.
With a view to protect Moroccan consumers, we recommend that regulatory authorities should revise the national mycotoxin regulations to lower the MRL of OTA from 3 to 1 µg/kg in bakery products, in order to protect large consumers, especially in littoral regions where OTA exposure could be high. Consumption of bakery products, especially bread, is very important by Moroccan households. This downward revision should reduce the contribution of these products to human OTA exposure by 32% in large consumers of cereal derivatives in the country. The new OTA regulation EC No 1370/2022, adopted by European countries by lowering the MRL from 3 to 2 µg/kg in bakery products, was based specifically on new contamination data. The EFSA considered that it was not necessary to establish a guideline value for health protection for OTA, and that the tolerable weekly intake of 120 ng/kg b.w./week, as established in 2006, was no longer valid. It further concluded that the calculated margin of exposure (MOE) for the carcinogenic effects of OTA indicate that it could pose a health concern for certain groups of consumers [16].
Regarding the methodology for risk characterization associated with OTA exposure, and given that the genotoxic status of OTA is very controversial, it would be interesting to examine this aspect under the assumption that OTA is genotoxic and therefore acts without a toxicity threshold.
Indeed, EFSA [51], Barlow et al. [52] and Kuiper-Goodman et al. [47] claim that OTA should be regulated as a genotoxic substance. This remains valid in the case of substances which are carcinogenic but whose carcinogenic mode of action has not been identified. This is actually a default position based on a lack of other information.
We will thus propose that the present work should be analyzed according to an approach adapted to this new hypothesis, such as the MOE, which is applied for risk characterization associated with substances which act without a toxicity threshold. It would be interesting to check if the risk for the consumers remains unchanged in the two approaches or if an underestimation has been produced.
Finally, according to recent investigations, the presence of other components, mainly, the co-presence of mycotoxins in cereal derivatives, could affect the final bioavailability of mycotoxins, including OTA [53]. it would be interesting to evaluate the bioaccessibility and the bioavailability of OTA in order to estimate, by toxicokinetic data modeling (in vitro and in vivo models), the internal contributions of OTA that pass into the bloodstream and induce the harmful effects associated with this mycotoxin.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study shows that cereal derivatives constitute an important vector of exposure to ochratoxin A, particularly in coastal regions with humid and temperate climates. The risk of developing harmful effects of OTA would be higher in these regions compared to the Moroccan arid regions. Cereal products alone are capable of causing a significant overrun of the tolerance reference value among heavy consumers of these derivatives in coastal regions. In this regard, we underline the importance of reconsidering the maximum limits of OTA in cereal derivatives set by national regulations. The methodology used could be further refined to consider Moroccan dietary habits.

5. Materials and Methods

Estimating exposure to food contaminants is an activity that remains complex, and no single approach is suitable for all circumstances. The method chosen depends on the information available, the population group concerned, the evaluation of the acute or chronic effects of the contaminant and the intended use of the result [54].
Several methods are reported in the literature on the estimation of consumer exposure to food contaminants. The application of these methods requires: (1) Availability of contamination data reporting the levels of chemicals in the food vectors; (2) Availability of the official consumption data of foods by age groups or population groups; and (3) the use of an estimation method that combines contamination data with consumption data. The data combination can be carried out according to different approaches: (a) a deterministic approach; (b) a simple distribution; or (c) a probabilistic approach.
The present study included three Moroccan cereal products, namely: bread, pasta and semolina. These three products were taken from the local market in the two regions of Tétouan (littoral) and Marrakech (continental), where the climate considerably differs. The littoral region is a coastal and Mediterranean area located in North Morocco with a humid and temperate climate (annual mean temperature: 17.2 °C; precipitation: 585 mm; and annual humidity level: 54), and the continental region is located in the center of Morocco with a dry and arid climate (annual mean temperature: 18.5 °C, precipitations: 288 mm; and annual humidity level: 75).
The EWI of OTA from the three considered food products were calculated for consumers, according to the following Equation (1) [55,56]:
E W I = i = 1 3 C i × Q t e i B . W .
where:
EWI: the estimated weekly intake associated with the consumption of the three foods (i: 1: bread, 2: pasta, 3: semolina) in ng/kg of body weight/week (ng/kg b.w./week);
Ci: the observed mean of OTA concentration for each of the foods i in µg/Kg;
Qtei: a percentile or average of the average quantity of food consumed per week per individual in g; and
B.W.: the mean body weight of an individual in kg (70 kg).
The EWI was estimated according to the assumptions that OTA contamination level of the three cereal derivatives is relatively stable over time; individuals do not change their eating habits much and, therefore, the intra-individual variability in the consumption of cereal derivatives is relatively low; and, finally, consumption data for bread, pasta and semolina are independent.
The calculation of the EWI was determined among high consumers using the 95th percentiles of the consumption of the three considered foods. If the PTWI was exceeded, a probabilistic calculation was conducted by integrating both the variability between the consumption of individuals and the uncertainties linked to the sampling of foods and interviewed individuals on their consumption of the three foods (bread, semolina and pasta). The calculation followed the following steps:
A total of 1000 draws are made with replacement (replications) from all of the results obtained on different foods. At each of the replications, the mean of the concentrations is calculated. Thus, 1000 averages for each of the three elements are obtained;
The consumption table, which is made up of 474 rows (individuals) and 4 columns, and considers the weight of the individuals, means that the weekly consumption of bread, pasta and semolina was replicated 1000 times, each time carrying out 474 draws with replacement of each row of the table. A total table of 474,000 rows is obtained;
For each of the lines, the weekly exposure to OTA is calculated by summing the products of the weekly quantity of the food by its average concentration of OTA, then dividing this sum by the weight. The average of the OTA concentrations is chosen from among the 1000 values already calculated, with respect to the replication number (1 to 1000).
To characterize the risk of OTA, we compared the EWI to the PTWI set by JECFA at 100 ng/kg b.w./week (or 14 ng/kg b.w./day) [57]. JECFA derived the PTWI based on a nephrotoxicity study in pigs [11], the most sensitive species, using the lowest dose tested (8 µg OTA/kg b.w./day) and applying a safety factor of 500. At this date, there is no information available that JECFA has reviewed its opinion on the mechanisms of genotoxicity of OTA, unlike EFSA. According to JECFA, there is no conclusive evidence that OTA binds to DNA and there is suggestive evidence regarding the role of oxidative processes, such as lipid peroxidation. Several reports have reached a similar conclusion [16,58,59].

5.1. Contamination Data

A total of two hundred twenty-six (n = 226) samples of cereals derivatives, including bread (n = 90), pasta (n = 59) and semolina (n = 77), were randomly collected in different conditions from the continental (n = 118) and littoral (n = 108) regions. All samples were ground and thoroughly mixed to <1 mm, divided into subsamples of 100 g and stored at 4 °C until OTA analysis. OTA was extracted from cereal derivatives samples and analyzed by a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) system LC 1445 coupled with fluorescence detection (LC-FD), according to an internal validated method previously reported by Tabarani et al. [39]. The detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) limits that were reached by the employed method were 0.017 and 0.05 µg/kg, respectively. The contamination levels of the three cereal derivatives by OTA were estimated by applying the recommendations of GEMS/FOOD on left-censored data [60]. This estimation was made under the two usual assumptions:
A low hypothesis (Lower Bound: LB): the undetected concentrations (ND) are replaced by 0 and the unquantified ones (NQ) have been substituted by the detection limit (LOD).
A high hypothesis (Upper Bound: UB): the ND are replaced by the detection limit (LOD) and the NQs by the qualification limit (LOQ).

5.2. Consumption Data

The consumption data comes from a survey conducted using the 24 h recall method. A single 24 h recall was carried out on 474 subjects surveyed at the entrance of a supermarket during the weekend, located in the center-region. A consumer survey questionnaire has been developed for this purpose. Respondents were asked to recall the portions consumed of the three cereal derivatives studied during the day before the survey. Photographs illustrating different portions that can be consumed were used as a support to estimate consumption quantities. The frequencies of consumption of these products were also noted, which made it possible to estimate the quantities consumed during a whole week. The consumers were asked to provide an estimate of their body weight in kg.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.H.A. and A.Z.; methodology, A.T.; software, A.T. and M.S.; validation, E.H.A. and A.Z.; investigation, A.T.; resources, A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T.; writing—review and editing, A.Z., J.M.R. and M.S.; supervision, E.H.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by an internal grant from Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine (Morocco). The author A.T. is most grateful to IAV Institute for the facilities and technical assistance given.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this study are available in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the COST Action 18101 SOURDOMICS—Sourdough biotechnology network towards novel, healthier and sustainable food and bioprocesses (https://sourdomics.com/; https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA18101/, accessed on 15 May 2023), where the author A.Z. is member of the working groups 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8, and the author J.M.R. is the Chair and Grant Holder Scientific Representative and is supported by COST (European Co-operation in Science and Technology) (https://www.cost.eu/, accessed on 15 May 2023). COST is a funding agency for research and innovation networks. Author J.M.R. also acknowledges the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF—Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina—Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Porto, Portugal, as well as the support made by LA/P/0045/2020 (ALiCE) and UIDB/00511/2020-UIDP/00511/2020 (LEPABE) funded by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Awuchi, C.G.; Ondari, E.N.; Nwozo, S.; Odongo, G.A.; Eseoghene, I.J.; Twinomuhwezi, H.; Ogbonna, C.U.; Upadhyay, A.K.; Adeleye, A.O.; Okpala, C.O.R. Mycotoxins’ Toxicological Mechanisms Involving Humans, Livestock and Their Associated Health Concerns: A Review. Toxins 2022, 14, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhou, X.; Liu, M.; Zang, H.; Liu, X.; Shan, A.; Feng, X. Alleviation of Oral Exposure to Aflatoxin B1-Induced Renal Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Cell Apoptosis in Mice Kidney by Curcumin. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Amézqueta, S.; Schorr-Galindo, S.; Murillo-Arbizu, M.; González-Peñas, E.; López de Cerain, A.; Guiraud, J. OTA-producing fungi in foodstuffs. Food Control. 2012, 26, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Santos, L.; Marín, S.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J. Screening of mycotoxin multicontamination in medicinal and aromatic herbs sampled in Spain. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1802–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. van der Merwe, K.J.; Steyn, P.S.; Fourie, L.; Scott, D.B.; Theron, J.J. Ochratoxin A, a toxic metabolite produced by Aspergillus ochraceus Wilh. Nature 1965, 205, 1112–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Serra, R.; Abrunhosa, L.; Kozakiewicz, Z.; Venâncio, A. Black Aspergillus species as ochratoxin A producers in Portuguese wine grapes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 88, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kortei, N.K.; Oman Ayiku, P.; Nsor-Atindana, J.; Owusu Ansah, L.; Wiafe-Kwagyan, M.; Kyei-Baffour, V.; Kottoh, I.D.; Odamtten, G.T. Toxicogenic fungal profile, Ochratoxin A exposure and cancer risk characterization through maize (Zea mays) consumed by different age populations in the Volta region of Ghana. Toxicon 2023, 226, 107085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdallah, M.F.; Krska, R.; Sulyok, M. Occurrence of Ochratoxins, Fumonisin B2, Aflatoxins (B1 and B2), and Other Secondary Fungal Metabolites in Dried Date Palm Fruits from Egypt: A Mini-Survey. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the commission related to ochratoxin A in food. EFSA J. 2006, 365, 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  10. Stoev, S.D. New Evidences about the Carcinogenic Effects of Ochratoxin A and Possible Prevention by Target Feed Additives. Toxins 2022, 14, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krogh, P. Causal associations of mycotoxins nephropathy. Acta Pathol.Microbiol. Scand. 1978, 269, 28. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jadot, I.; Declèves, A.-E.; Nortier, J.; Caron, N. An Integrated View of Aristolochic Acid Nephropathy: Update of the Literature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Schlatter, C.; Studer-Rohr, J.; Rásonyi, T. Carcinogenicity and kinetic aspects of ochratoxin A. Food Addit. Contam. 1996, 13, 43–44. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans. Some Naturally Occurring Substances: Food Items and Constituent Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines and Mycotoxins; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  15. JECFA Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Safety Evaluation of Certain Mycotoxins in Food: 56th Meeting of the Food Additives Series N°47; Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schrenk, D.; Bodin, L.; Chipman, J.K.; del Mazo, J.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; Hogstrand, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Leblanc, J.; Nebbia, C.S.; Nielsen, E.; et al. Risk assessment of ochratoxin A in food. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e06113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iavicoli, I.; Brera, C.; Carelli, G.; Caputi, R.; Marinaccio, A.; Miraglia, M. External and internal dose in subjects occupationally exposed to ochratoxin A. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2002, 75, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Malir, F.; Ostry, V.; Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A.; Malir, J.; Toman, J. Ochratoxin A: 50 Years of Research. Toxins 2016, 8, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Longobardi, C.; Ferrara, G.; Andretta, E.; Montagnaro, S.; Damiano, S.; Ciarcia, R. Ochratoxin A and Kidney Oxidative Stress: The Role of Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine—A Review. Toxins 2022, 14, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, S.; Zhou, S.; Lyu, B.; Qiu, N.; Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Y. Dietary exposure to fumonisins and ochratoxins in the Chinese general population during 2007–2020: Results from three consecutive total diet studies. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 159, 112768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Foerster, C.; Monsalve, L.; Ríos-Gajardo, G. Mycotoxin Exposure in Children through Breakfast Cereal Consumption in Chile. Toxins 2022, 14, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Do, T.H.; Tran, S.C.; Le, C.D.; Nguyen, H.-B.T.; Le, P.-T.T.; Le, H.-H.T.; Le, T.D.; Thai-Nguyen, H.-T. Dietary exposure and health risk characterization of aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, fumonisin B1, and zearalenone in food from different provinces in Northern Vietnam. Food Control. 2020, 112, 107108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al Ayoubi, M.; Salman, M.; Gambacorta, L.; El Darra, N.; Solfrizzo, M. Assessment of Dietary Exposure to Ochratoxin A in Lebanese Students and Its Urinary Biomarker Analysis. Toxins 2021, 13, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zaied, C.; Bouaziz, C.; Azizi, I.; Bensassi, F.; Chour, A.; Bacha, H.; Abid, S. Presence of ochratoxin A in Tunisian blood nephropathy patients. Exposure level to OTA. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2011, 63, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zinedine, A. Ochratoxin A in Moroccan foods: Occurrence and legislation. Toxins 2010, 2, 1121–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zinedine, A.; Soriano, J.M.; Juan, C.; Mojemmi, B.; Moltó, J.C.; Bouklouze, A.; Cherrah, Y.; Idrissi, L.; El Aouad, R.; Mañes, J. Incidence of ochratoxin A in rice and dried fruits form Rabat and Salé area, Morocco. Food Addit. Contam. 2007, 24, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Juan, C.; Zinedine, A.; Idrissi, L.; Mañes, J. Ochratoxin A in rice on the Moroccan retail market. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 126, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zinedine, A.; Blesa, J.; Mahnine, N.; El Abidi, A.; Montesano, D.; Mañes, J. Pressurized liquid extraction coupled to liquid chromatography for the analysis of ochratoxin A in breakfast and infants cereals from Morocco. Food Control. 2010, 21, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zinedine, A.; Juan, C.; Idrissi, L.; Mañes, J. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in bread consumed in Morocco. Microchem. J. 2007, 87, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zinedine, A.; Fernández-Franzón, M.; Mañes, J.; Manyes, L. Multi-mycotoxin contamination of couscous semolina commercialized in Morocco. Food Chem. 2017, 214, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zinedine, A.; Brera, C.; Elakhdari, S.; Catano, C.; Debegnach, F.; Angelini, S.; De Santis, B.; Faid, M.; Benlemlih, M.; Minardi, V.; et al. Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in cereals and spices commercialized in Morocco. Food Control. 2006, 17, 868–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zinedine, A.; Mañes, J. Occurrence and legislation of mycotoxins in food and feed from Morocco. Food Control. 2009, 20, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Allali, F. Evolution des pratiques alimentaires au Maroc. Int. J. Med. Surg 2017, 4, 70–73. [Google Scholar]
  34. BO 2022. Arrêté Conjoint N°1643-16 Du 30 Mai 2016, Abrogé et Remplacé Par l’annexe à l’arrêté Conjoint N°2410-22 Du 17 Safar 1444 (14 Septembre 2022). Bulletin Officiel N°7136 du 20/10/2022. 2022; p. 1573. Available online: https://www.onssa.gov.ma/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ARR.1643-16.FR_.c2.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2023).
  35. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Food and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006. Official Journal of the European Union L 119/103 of 5.5.2023. 2023. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32023R0915 (accessed on 3 July 2023).
  36. European Commission. Commission regulation (EU) 2022/1370 of 5 August 2022 mending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of ochratoxin A in certain foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2022, L 206/11, 5–24. [Google Scholar]
  37. Haut Commissariat au Plan. Enquête Nationale sur la Consommation et des Dépenses des Ménages. Available online: https://www.hcp.ma/Enquete-nationale-sur-la-consommation-et-les-depenses-des-menages_a95.html (accessed on 3 July 2023).
  38. Food and Agriculture Organization. Perspectives de L’alimentation: Analyse des Marchés Mondiaux. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/al989f/al989f.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2023).
  39. Tabarani, A.; Zinedine, A.; Bouchriti, N.; Abdennebi, E.H. Exposure assessment to ochratoxin A through the intake of three cereal derivatives from the Moroccan market. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mannaa, M.; Kim, K.D. Influence of Temperature and Water Activity on Deleterious Fungi and Mycotoxin Production during Grain Storage. Mycobiology 2017, 45, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zingales, V.; Taroncher, M.; Martino, P.A.; Ruiz, M.-J.; Caloni, F. Climate Change and Effects on Molds and Mycotoxins. Toxins 2022, 14, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cervini, C.; Verheecke-Vaessen, C.; Ferrara, M.; García-Cela, E.; Magistà, D.; Medina, A.; Gallo, A.; Magan, N.; Perrone, G. Interacting climate change factors (CO2 and temperature cycles) effects on growth, secondary metabolite gene expression and phenotypic ochratoxin A production by Aspergillus carbonarius strains on a grape-based matrix. Fungal Biol. 2021, 125, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, C.; Van der Fels-Klerx, H.J. Quantitative Modeling of Climate Change Impacts on Mycotoxins in Cereals: A Review. Toxins 2021, 13, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Duarte, S.C.; Bento, J.M.V.; Pena, A.; Lino, C.M. Ochratoxin A exposure assessment of the inhabitants of Lisbon during winter 2007/2008 through bread and urine analysis. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2009, 26, 1411–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miraglia, M.; Brera, C. Assessment of dietary intake of ochratoxin A by the population of EU member states. Rep. Tasks Sci. Coop. Rep. 2002, 3, 77–78. [Google Scholar]
  46. González-Osnaya, L.; Soriano, J.M.; Moltó, J.C.; Mañes, J. Dietary intake of ochratoxin A from conventional and organic bread. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 118, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kuiper-Goodman, T.; Hilts, C.; Billiard, S.M.; Kiparissis, Y.; Richard, I.D.K.; Hayward, S. Health risk assessment of ochratoxin A for all age-sex strata in a market economy. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2010, 27, 212–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Raad, F.; Nasreddine, L.; Hilan, C.; Bartosik, M.; Parent-Massin, D. Dietary exposure to aflatoxins, ochratoxin A and deoxynivalenol from a total diet study in an adult urban Lebanese population. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 73, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. ANSES. Étude de L’alimentation Totale Française 2 (EAT 2) Tome 1—Contaminants inorganiques, Minéraux, Polluants Organiques Persistants, Mycotoxines et Phyto-Estrogènes. Anses, Agence Natl. sécurité Sanit. L’alimentation, l’environnement du Trav. 2011, 2006-SA-03, 346. [Google Scholar]
  50. Thompson, K.M.; Graham, J.D. Going beyond the single number: Using probabilistic risk assessment to improve risk management. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 1996, 2, 1008–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. EFSA. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to A Harmonised Approach for Risk Assessment of Substances Which are both Genotoxic and Carcinogenic. EFSA J. 2005, 3, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Barlow, S.; Renwick, A.G.; Kleiner, J.; Bridges, J.W.; Busk, L.; Dybing, E.; Edler, L.; Eisenbrand, G.; Fink-Gremmels, J.; Knaap, A.; et al. Risk assessment of substances that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 1636–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Llorens Castelló, P.; Juan-García, A.; Cortés, J.C.M.; Mañes Vinuesa, J.; Juan García, C. Application of an In Vitro Digestion Model for Wheat and Red Beetroot Bread to Assess the Bioaccessibility of Aflatoxin B1, Ochratoxin A and Zearalenone and Betalains. Toxins 2022, 14, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Parmar, B.; Miller, P.; Burt, R. Stepwise Approaches for Estimating the Intakes of Chemicals in Food. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1997, 26, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Exposure Assessment. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Exposure Assessment. Risk Assess. Forum 1992, 57, 22888–22938. Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=15263 (accessed on 3 July 2023).
  56. FAO/WHO. Dietary Exposure Assessment of Chemicals in Food: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Consultation; World Health Organization: Annapolis, MD, USA, 2005; pp. 1–88. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44027 (accessed on 3 July 2023).
  57. JECFA. Evaluation de Certains Additifs Alimentaires et Contaminants: Quarante-Quatrième Rapport du Comité Mixte FAO/OMS d’ Experts des Additifs Alimentaires; Organisation mondiale de la Santé: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995; p. 58 p. [Google Scholar]
  58. Haighton, L.A.; Lynch, B.S.; Magnuson, B.A.; Nestmann, E.R. A reassessment of risk associated with dietary intake of ochratoxin A based on a lifetime exposure model. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2012, 42, 147–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rached, E.; Hard, G.C.; Blumbach, K.; Weber, K.; Draheim, R.; Lutz, W.K.; Özden, S.; Steger, U.; Dekant, W.; Mally, A. Ochratoxin A: 13-Week Oral Toxicity and Cell Proliferation in Male F344/N Rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 97, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. GEMS/FOOD. GEMS/Food-EURO Second Workshop on Reliable Evaluation of Low-Level Contamination of Food Report on a Workshop in the Frame of GEMS / Food-EURO Kulmbach. 1999. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/GEMS-Food-EURO-Second-Workshop-on-Reliable-of-of-on/7d5162794a407ce3361458649750a63b6bda3381 (accessed on 3 July 2023).
Figure 1. Distribution of weekly consumption (Kg/kg b.w./week) of cereals derivatives observed in the littoral region.
Figure 1. Distribution of weekly consumption (Kg/kg b.w./week) of cereals derivatives observed in the littoral region.
Toxins 15 00452 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of OTA concentrations (ng/kg) observed in the littoral region.
Figure 2. Distribution of OTA concentrations (ng/kg) observed in the littoral region.
Toxins 15 00452 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of average OTA concentrations (ng/kg) for the three cereal derivatives obtained with the 1000 draws with presentation of the results observed in in the littoral region.
Figure 3. Distribution of average OTA concentrations (ng/kg) for the three cereal derivatives obtained with the 1000 draws with presentation of the results observed in in the littoral region.
Toxins 15 00452 g003
Figure 4. Cumulative distribution of EWI—Probabilistic approach.
Figure 4. Cumulative distribution of EWI—Probabilistic approach.
Toxins 15 00452 g004
Table 1. OTA levels (µg/Kg) in analyzed cereal derivatives samples.
Table 1. OTA levels (µg/Kg) in analyzed cereal derivatives samples.
Sampling AreaCereal ProductSample SizeMinimumMean UB 1Maximum
Littoral
Bread440.021.32 ± 0.537.2
Semolina320.020.64 ± 0.343
Pasta320.020.18 ± 0.121.1
0.82 ± 0.06 2,3
Continental
Bread460.020.05 ± 0.030.5
Semolina450.020.61 ± 0.8014.13
Pasta270.020.56 ± 0.262.1
0.36 ± 0.01 2,3
1 Mean contamination level obtained under a high hypothesis (Upper Bound: UB) was retained because no statistical difference was observed between mean UB and mean LB (Lower Bound). 2 Average contamination of the three cereal derivatives. 3 Significant difference (p-value = 0.0062) between the mean contamination levels (littoral versus continental).
Table 2. Exposure (in ng/kg b.w./week) for different percentiles of consumption.
Table 2. Exposure (in ng/kg b.w./week) for different percentiles of consumption.
Sampling AreaCereal DerivativeP25P50MeanP75P95
Bread37.7145.2652.3356.57103.7
LittoralSemolina1.403.203.956.408.69
Pasta0.260.510.700.901.93
Total EWI39.3748.9756.9863.87114.3
Bread1.431.711.982.143.93
ContinentalSemolina1.333.053.766.108.28
Pasta0.801.602.182.806.00
Total EWI3.566.367.9211.0418.21
p-value 1 0.00130.0090.0190.0170.027
1: p-value between littoral and continental EWI for the different percentiles (P25, P50, P75 and P95) and the mean.
Table 3. Exposure (in ng/kg b.w./week) according to the probabilistic approach for different percentiles of consumption.
Table 3. Exposure (in ng/kg b.w./week) according to the probabilistic approach for different percentiles of consumption.
ExposureCI(95%)Median
Mean[35.45–72.48]51.88
P50[32.60–67.38]48.22
P75[42.58–86.38]61.81
P95[66.18–137.79]97.44
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tabarani, A.; Zinedine, A.; Rocha, J.M.; Sanaa, M.; Abdennebi, E.H. Comparative Study of Ochratoxin A Exposure through the Intake of Cereal Products in Two Climatic Moroccan Regions. Toxins 2023, 15, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15070452

AMA Style

Tabarani A, Zinedine A, Rocha JM, Sanaa M, Abdennebi EH. Comparative Study of Ochratoxin A Exposure through the Intake of Cereal Products in Two Climatic Moroccan Regions. Toxins. 2023; 15(7):452. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15070452

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tabarani, Ahmed, Abdellah Zinedine, João Miguel Rocha, Moez Sanaa, and El Hassane Abdennebi. 2023. "Comparative Study of Ochratoxin A Exposure through the Intake of Cereal Products in Two Climatic Moroccan Regions" Toxins 15, no. 7: 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15070452

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop