Next Article in Journal
Yerba Maté (Ilex paraguariensis) Metabolic, Satiety, and Mood State Effects at Rest and during Prolonged Exercise
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Breakfast Cereals Available in the Mexican Market: Sodium and Sugar Content
Previous Article in Journal
Diet Quality Scores of Australian Adults Who Have Completed the Healthy Eating Quiz
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in Consumer Attitudes toward Broad-Based and Environment-Specific Sodium Policies—SummerStyles 2012 and 2015

The Healthy Eating Agenda in Australia. Is Salt a Priority for Manufacturers?

The Australian Health Policy Collaboration, College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, 300 Queen St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2017, 9(8), 881;
Received: 15 June 2017 / Revised: 7 August 2017 / Accepted: 10 August 2017 / Published: 15 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reducing Dietary Sodium and Improving Human Health)
Many nation states have endorsed and acted on the World Health Organization’s target of a 30% reduction in global salt consumption by 2025. In Australia, new government-led voluntary measures were initiated in 2009, consisting of public–private partnerships, front-of-pack labelling, and food reformulation targets (which include reduced salt). How Australia’s private sector has responded to this healthy eating agenda has been investigated in a limited way, particularly with regards to manufacturers which produce processed foods considered significant sources of sodium. In this study we asked: have Australia’s largest food manufacturers made “…positive (nutrition) changes to their product portfolios” as disclosed in their public policies, priorities, and communications? And, is salt reduction a priority for processed food manufacturers? A systematic search and critical content-analysis of grey literature published by food manufacturers was conducted. The results suggest half of the sample publically describe some salt reduction activities but the scale and efficacy of these changes is unclear from the available literature. The Australian Government’s Healthy Food Partnership could capitalise on current documented activities in salt reduction, and implement a more comprehensive healthy eating agenda moving forward. In light of the increasing rates of hypertension, population salt consumption and diet-related disease, more could be done. View Full-Text
Keywords: salt; food policy; food reformulation; food industry salt; food policy; food reformulation; food industry
MDPI and ACS Style

Lindberg, R.; Nichols, T.; Yam, C. The Healthy Eating Agenda in Australia. Is Salt a Priority for Manufacturers? Nutrients 2017, 9, 881.

AMA Style

Lindberg R, Nichols T, Yam C. The Healthy Eating Agenda in Australia. Is Salt a Priority for Manufacturers? Nutrients. 2017; 9(8):881.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lindberg, Rebecca, Tyler Nichols, and Chrystal Yam. 2017. "The Healthy Eating Agenda in Australia. Is Salt a Priority for Manufacturers?" Nutrients 9, no. 8: 881.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop