Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Lessons from Studies to Evaluate an Online 24-Hour Recall for Use with Children and Adults in Canada
Previous Article in Journal
Normal Bone Mineral Density Associates with Duodenal Mucosa Healing in Adult Patients with Celiac Disease on a Gluten-Free Diet
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterizing Early Adolescent Plate Waste Using the Mobile Food Record
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Nutrients 2017, 9(2), 99;

Comparing Computerised Dietary Analysis with a Ready Reckoner in a Real World Setting: Is Technology an Improvement?

Department of Nutrition, Dietetics & Food, Monash University, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Vic 3168, Australia
Allied Health Research Office, Eastern Health, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Vic 3128, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 November 2016 / Accepted: 28 January 2017 / Published: 31 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technology Based Approaches to Dietary Intake Assessment)
Full-Text   |   PDF [684 KB, uploaded 11 February 2017]   |  


Ready reckoners are used in the clinical setting as a tool for the estimation of nutrient intake. With increasing opportunities for nutrition research, ready reckoners may provide for a more rapid analysis of nutritional intake than computerised methods, often seen as the gold standard for nutritional analysis. This research aimed to determine the level of agreement between ready reckoner and computerised dietary analysis through a secondary analysis of clinical trial data. Participant food intakes were estimated by trained observers using the one-quarter method. Daily energy and protein intake were estimated by the healthcare network ready reckoner and computerised dietary analysis. Agreement between methods was tested using t-tests, correlations and Bland-Altman plots. A correlation between analysis methods was observed (r = 0.9086 energy, r = 0.8700 protein). Wide limits of agreement were observed for both energy and protein intake. Compared with the computerised method, ready reckoner analysis underestimated energy intake by 600 kJ and protein intake by 5 g. Mean energy and protein intake calculated by each method was significantly different (p < 0.0001 energy; p < 0.0001 protein). No time differences between analysis methods were observed. In the clinical setting, practitioners should be aware of the variability of a ready reckoner compared to computerised dietary analysis. Further investigation into the acceptability of ready reckoners as a reliable method of nutrient intake determination, particularly for analysis of nutrition research, is required. View Full-Text
Keywords: ready reckoner; computerized dietary analysis; nutritional analysis; Bland-Altman ready reckoner; computerized dietary analysis; nutritional analysis; Bland-Altman

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Paciepnik, J.; Porter, J. Comparing Computerised Dietary Analysis with a Ready Reckoner in a Real World Setting: Is Technology an Improvement? Nutrients 2017, 9, 99.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top