Next Article in Journal
The Economic Impact of Lower Protein Infant Formula for the Children of Overweight and Obese Mothers
Next Article in Special Issue
Phylloquinone and Menaquinone-4 Tissue Distribution at Different Life Stages in Male and Female Sprague–Dawley Rats Fed Different VK Levels Since Weaning or Subjected to a 40% Calorie Restriction since Adulthood
Previous Article in Journal
Low Calorie Beverage Consumption Is Associated with Energy and Nutrient Intakes and Diet Quality in British Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Insights into the Pros and Cons of the Clinical Use of Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)
Open AccessReview

Concepts and Controversies in Evaluating Vitamin K Status in Population-Based Studies

USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2016, 8(1), 8;
Received: 25 September 2015 / Revised: 4 December 2015 / Accepted: 9 December 2015 / Published: 2 January 2016
A better understanding of vitamin K’s role in health and disease requires the assessment of vitamin K nutritional status in population and clinical studies. This is primarily accomplished using dietary questionnaires and/or biomarkers. Because food composition databases in the US are most complete for phylloquinone (vitamin K1, the primary form in Western diets), emphasis has been on phylloquinone intakes and associations with chronic diseases. There is growing interest in menaquinone (vitamin K2) intakes for which the food composition databases need to be expanded. Phylloquinone is commonly measured in circulation, has robust quality control schemes and changes in response to phylloquinone intake. Conversely, menaquinones are generally not detected in circulation unless large quantities are consumed. The undercarboxylated fractions of three vitamin K-dependent proteins are measurable in circulation, change in response to vitamin K supplementation and are modestly correlated. Since different vitamin K dependent proteins are implicated in different diseases the appropriate vitamin K-dependent protein biomarker depends on the outcome under study. In contrast to other nutrients, there is no single biomarker that is considered a gold-standard measure of vitamin K status. Most studies have limited volume of specimens. Strategic decisions, guided by the research question, need to be made when deciding on choice of biomarkers. View Full-Text
Keywords: vitamin K; epidemiology; vitamin K intake; biomarkers; review vitamin K; epidemiology; vitamin K intake; biomarkers; review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shea, M.K.; Booth, S.L. Concepts and Controversies in Evaluating Vitamin K Status in Population-Based Studies. Nutrients 2016, 8, 8.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop